Search

Background: Targeting constitutively active mutant kinases with selective small molecule inhibitors is a key therapeutic pillar of precision oncology. Phosphatidylinositol-4,5bisphosphate-3 kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations leading to oncogenic activation of PI3Kα represent the largest opportunity for this approach in solid tumors. However, there is no selective inhibitor that targets mutant PI3Kα in the clinic. Toxicity related to non-selective inhibition of WT PI3Kα (hyperglycemia) and other PI3K isoforms limits the tolerability, dosing and efficacy of the orthosteric inhibitor, alpelisib, the only approved solid tumor PI3K inhibitor. RLY-2608, a novel oral allosteric PI3Kα inhibitor, is uniquely designed to overcome these limitations via mutant- and isoform-selective PI3Kα inhibition for greater target coverage, improved tolerability and antitumor activity. We initiated a first-in-human (FIH), study to evaluate the clinical activity of RLY-2608 as a single agent in advanced solid tumor patients (pts) with PI3KCA mutations and in combination with fulvestrant in pts with PIK3CA mutant, HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This is a global, multi-center, dose escalation/expansion study (NCT05216432) of RLY2608 as a single agent in adults who have advanced solid tumors and are refractory, intolerant, or declined standard therapy and RLY-2608 in combination with fulvestrant in previously treated pts with HR+/HER2- MBC. Eligibility criteria include presence of PI3KCA mutation (blood or tumor) per local assessment, ECOG performance status 0-1, measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1 and no prior PI3K inhibitor (except combination group 2). RLY-2608 is administered on a continuous schedule with 4-week cycles. Adverse events (AEs) per CTCAE v5, PK, biomarkers (mutant ctDNAs and insulin pathway markers) and anti-tumor activity are assessed serially. Dose escalation employs a Bayesian Optimal Interval design to identify MTD and RP2D. Following dose escalation, pts will be treated with RLY-2608 at the MTD/RP2D in a monotherapy dose expansion with 5 groups (N=75, 15 each): 1. Clear cell ovarian carcinoma 2. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma 3. Cervical cancer 4. Other solid tumors 5. PI3KCA double mutations. In addition, two expansion cohorts will enroll patients with HR+/HER2- MBC treated with RLY-2608 and fulvestrant combination (N = 30, 15 each): 1. No prior PI3K therapy 2. Intolerant to PI3K inhibitors. The primary endpoints are MTD/RP2D and AE profile for single agent and combination; key secondary endpoints are PI3KCA genotype in blood and tumor, PK, biomarkers, and overall response rate. US enrollment began December 2021 and ex-USA startup is under way. Citation Format: Andreas Varkaris, Erika Hamilton, Jason Henry, Alexander I. Spira, Alison M. Schram, Julia E. McGuinness, Gege Tan, Xiaoyan Li, Tamieka Hunter, Ramin Samadani, Alison Timm, Djuro Karanovic, Vivek Subbiah, Cesar A. Perez. First-in-human global multi-center study of RLY-2608, a pan mutant and isoform selective PI3Kα inhibitor, as a single agent in advanced solid tumor patients and in combination with fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-22-01.

Background: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a highly potent topoisomerase I (Topo I) inhibitor payload via a stable, tumor-selective, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Dato-DXd demonstrated compelling single-agent antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative BC (Krop, SABCS 2021). This is the first report of results from the TROPION-PanTumor01 study in pts with unresectable or metastatic hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−; including HER2-low and HER2-zero) BC. Methods: TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) is a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, 2-part dose-escalation/expansion study evaluating Dato-DXd in previously treated pts with solid tumors. Based on previous clinical findings and exposure-response results from pts with NSCLC, Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV Q3W is being evaluated in pts with unresectable or metastatic HR+/HER2− BC that progressed on standard therapies. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Tumor responses, including ORR (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and DCR (CR + PR + stable disease [SD]), were assessed per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Results: As of the April 29, 2022, data cutoff, 41 pts had received Dato-DXd (median follow-up, 10.9 mo [range, 7-13]); 9 pts were ongoing. The primary cause of treatment discontinuation was disease progression (63%; progressive disease [PD] or clinical progression). Median age was 57 y (range, 33-75); 54% had de novo metastatic disease. Pts were heavily pretreated (Table) with a median of 5 (range, 3-10) prior regimens in the advanced setting; 95% had prior CDK4/6i (adjuvant/metastatic). Median time from initial treatment for metastatic disease to the first dose of Dato-DXd was 42.7 mo (range, 10.2-131.1). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; all cause) were observed in 98% (any grade) and 41% (grade ≥3) of pts. Most common TEAEs (any grade, grade ≥3) were stomatitis (80%, 10%), nausea (56%, 0%), fatigue (46%, 2%), and alopecia (37%, 0%). Serious TEAEs were observed in 6 pts (15%); 1 pt died due to dyspnea, which was not considered to be treatment related. Dose reductions occurred in 5 pts due to stomatitis (n=3), fatigue (n=2), keratitis (n=1), and decreased appetite (n=1) (>1 AE per pt); 14 pts had treatment delayed due to stomatitis (n=8), retinopathy (n=1), dysphagia (n=1), fatigue (n=1), malaise (n=1), COVID-19 (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), urinary tract infection (n=1), decreased lymphocyte count (n=1), and nasal congestion (n=1; >1 AE per pt). Three pts discontinued treatment due to keratitis (n=1) and pneumonitis (n=2); 1 case of pneumonitis was adjudicated as grade 2 drug-related interstitial lung disease. The ORR was 29% (11 confirmed PRs; 1 pending confirmation), the DCR was 85% (35/41), and the clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD ≥6 mo) was 41% (17/41). Conclusions: Dato-DXd demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity, with high disease control in heavily pretreated pts, the majority having received prior CDK4/6i. Based on these findings, the TROPION-Breast01 (NCT05104866) randomized phase 3 study comparing 2L+ Dato-DXd vs investigator’s choice chemotherapy is currently enrolling pts with HR+/HER2− BC. Prior Therapies in the Adjuvant or Metastatic Setting Citation Format: Funda Meric-Bernstam, Ian Krop, Dejan Juric, Takahiro Kogawa, Erika Hamilton, Alexander I. Spira, Toru Mukohara, Takuya Tsunoda, Senthil Damodaran, Jonathan Greenberg, Wen Gu, Fumiaki Kobayashi, Hong Zebger-Gong, Yui Kawasaki, Rie Wong, Aditya Bardia. PD13-08 Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study Evaluating Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Unresectable or Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2–Negative Breast Cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-08.

Background: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 mAb covalently linked to a highly potent topoisomerase I (Topo I) inhibitor payload via a stable, tumor selective, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Dato-DXd has previously shown encouraging activity in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic TNBC (Krop, SABCS 2021). Here we report updated results from the TROPION-PanTumor01 study in pts with advanced/metastatic TNBC. Methods: TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) is a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, 2-part dose-escalation/expansion study evaluating Dato-DXd in previously treated pts with solid tumors. Based on previous clinical and exposure-response results from pts with NSCLC, Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV Q3W is being evaluated in pts with advanced TNBC that relapsed/progressed on standard therapies; 2 pts received 8 mg/kg prior to selection of 6 mg/kg. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Tumor responses, including objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + stable disease [SD]), were assessed per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review. Results: As of April 29, 2022, 44 pts received Dato-DXd (median follow-up, 16.6 mo [range, 13-22]) at the time of data cutoff. The primary cause of treatment discontinuation was disease progression (86%; PD or clinical progression), and 4 pts are still receiving therapy. Median age was 53 y (range, 32-82); 32% had de novo metastatic disease. Pts were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 (range, 1-10) prior regimens in the metastatic setting. Prior treatments included taxanes (91%), anthracyclines (75%), capecitabine (61%), platinum (52%), immunotherapy (43%), Topo I inhibitor–based ADC therapy (32%), and PARPi (18%). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; all cause) occurred in 100% (any grade) and 50% (grade ≥3) of pts, respectively. Most common TEAEs (any grade, grade ≥3) were stomatitis (73%, 11%), nausea (66%, 2%), vomiting (39%, 5%), fatigue (34%, 7%), and alopecia (36%, 0%). One pt had grade 3 decreased neutrophil count; no cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD) or grade ≥3 diarrhea were observed. Serious TEAEs were reported in 9 pts (20%); no deaths associated with adverse events (AEs) were observed. Dose reductions occurred in 8 pts (18%) due to stomatitis (n=3), fatigue (n=2), dry eye (n=1), retinal exudates (n=1), and dysgeusia (n=1); 12 pts (27%) delayed treatment due to stomatitis (n=5), dry eye (n=1), keratitis (n=1), blurred vision (n=1), fatigue (n=1), bronchitis (n=1), skin infection (n=1), musculoskeletal chest pain (n=1), dysgeusia (n=1), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=1), and dyspnea (n=1; >1 AE per pt). One pt (2%) discontinued treatment due to grade 1 pneumonitis (which was centrally adjudicated as not ILD). ORR in all pts was 32% (1 CR, 13 PRs), DCR was 80% (35/44), and clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD ≥6 mo) was 34% (15/44). Median duration of response was not yet reached; median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.3 mo (95% CI, 3.0-7.3), and median overall survival (mOS) was 12.9 mo (95% CI, 10.1-14.7). In the subset of pts without prior Topo I inhibitor–based ADC therapy and with measurable disease at baseline, ORR was 44% (12/27). Among all pts without prior Topo I inhibitor–based ADC therapy (n=30), mPFS was 7.3 mo (95% CI, 3.0-NE), and mOS was 14.3 mo (95% CI, 10.5-NE). Conclusions: Dato-DXd continues to demonstrate encouraging and durable antitumor activity, along with a manageable safety profile, in heavily pretreated pts with metastatic TNBC. Based on these findings, the phase 3 randomized TROPION-Breast02 (NCT05374512) trial comparing Dato-DXd vs chemotherapy as 1L therapy for pts with metastatic TNBC is currently underway. Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Ian Krop, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Anthony W. Tolcher, Toru Mukohara, Aaron Lisberg, Toshio Shimizu, Erika Hamilton, Alexander I. Spira, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos, Jonathan Greenberg, Wen Gu, Fumiaki Kobayashi, Hong Zebger-Gong, Yui Kawasaki, Rie Wong, Takahiro Kogawa. Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Updated Results From the Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-03.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase; First line; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor Cinasa del linfoma anaplásico; Primera línea; Inhibidor de la tirosina quinasa Quinasa del limfoma anaplàsic; Primera línia; Inhibidor de la tirosina quinasa Background Brigatinib is a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in locally advanced and metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in crizotinib-refractory and ALK inhibitor-naive settings. This analysis assessed brigatinib in Asian vs. non-Asian patients from the first-line ALTA-1L trial. Patients and Methods This was a subgroup analysis from the phase III ALTA-1L trial of brigatinib vs. crizotinib in ALK inhibitor–naive ALK+ NSCLC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC). Secondary endpoints included confirmed objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) in the overall population and BIRC-assessed intracranial ORR and PFS in patients with brain metastases. Results Of the 275 randomized patients, 108 were Asian. Brigatinib showed consistent superiority in BIRC-assessed PFS vs. crizotinib in Asian (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.20-0.59]; log-rank P = .0001; median 24.0 vs. 11.1 months) and non-Asian (HR: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.38-0.84]; log-rank P = .0041; median 24.7 vs. 9.4 months) patients. Results were consistent with investigator-assessed PFS and BIRC-assessed intracranial PFS. Brigatinib was well tolerated. Toxicity profiles and dose modification rates were similar between Asian and non-Asian patients. Conclusion Efficacy with brigatinib was consistently better than with crizotinib in Asian and non-Asian patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK inhibitor-naive ALK-+ NSCLC. There were no clinically notable differences in overall safety in Asian vs. non-Asian patients. This study was supported by ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. The sponsor designed and conducted the study and collected the data together with the authors. The sponsor managed and analyzed the data. Data were interpreted by the authors and the sponsor. The sponsor together with the authors prepared, reviewed, and approved the manuscript and made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Background: Addition of PI3K/mTOR inhibitor after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) can potentially restore sensitivity to CDK4/6i and prevent adaptive activation of the PI3K/mTOR pathway. To evaluate this hypothesis, we conducted a Phase Ib study of gedatolisib (G), a dual inhibitor of PI3K/mTOR, palbociclib (P) a CDK4/6i, and ET (with letrozole [LET] or fulvestrant [FUL]) in women with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). Manageable toxicity and preliminary antitumor activity were observed in 35 patients(pts) enrolled in the dose escalation portion of the study (Forero-Torres, ASCO 2018) and 103 pts enrolled in the expansion portion of the study (Layman, SABCS 2021). Here, we report updated efficacy and safety data and sub-group analysis by PIK3CA mutation status in the four expansion study arms with a March 3, 2022, data cut-off. Methods: Pts with HR+/HER2- ABC were treated in four expansion arms: A) G+P+LET as first-line treatment, B) G+P+FUL as 2nd line treatment in pts without prior CDK4/6i; C & D) G+P+FUL as 2nd or 3rd line therapy in pts with prior CDK4/6i. P, LET, and FUL were administered at standard doses. G 180 mg was intravenously administered weekly in Arms A, B, and C and three weeks on/one week off in Arm D. The primary endpoint was investigator assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety, duration of response and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Of the 103 pts treated with G+P+ ET in the expansion arms (A-D), 100% had measurable disease at baseline, 71% (73/103) lacked PIK3CA mutations (wild type; WT), 27% (28/103) had PIK3CA-mutations (MT), 70% (72/103) had evidence of bone metastases, and 59% (61/103) had liver metastases. The most frequent grade 3 and 4 treatment related AEs (TRAE) with G+P+ET included neutropenia (63%), stomatitis (27%), rash (20%), fatigue (11%) and hyperglycemia (7%). Treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs was 6.5% in Arm A, 15.4% in Arm B, 9.4% in Arm C and 3.7% in Arm D. Efficacy data for each arm is presented in Table 1. Promising ORR and PFS were seen in all arms regardless of PIK3CA mutation status. In Arm D, ORR was 63% overall, 73% in PIK3CA-MT pts, and 60% in PIK3CA-WT pts. Median PFS in Arm D was 12.9 months with a median follow up of 29 months. 60% and 48% of pts in the PIK3CA-MT and PIK3CA-WT Arm D sub-groups, respectively, were progression free at 12 months. Conclusions: These preliminary data demonstrate promising activity of G+P+ET combination in pts who were CDK4/6i-naïve and in those whose disease progressed on or after CDK4/6i therapy regardless of PIK3CA mutation status. Encouraging results in CDK4/6i treatment naïve patients warrant further evaluation of gedatolisib in combination with CDK4/6i treatment in the front-line setting. Arm D results provide a strong basis for the initiated Phase 3 study (VIKTORIA-1) in pts whose disease progressed on or after CDK4/6i therapy. Table 1. Efficacy Data by Expansion Arms Citation Format: Robert Wesolowski, Hope Rugo, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Hyo S. Han, Jennifer M. Specht, E. Claire Dees, Peter Kabos, Ulka Vaishampayan, Seth A. Wander, Janice Lu, Keerthi Gogineni, Alexander I. Spira, Anne F. Schott, Maysa Abu-Khalaf, Pratima Nayak, Brian F. Sullivan, Igor Gorbatchevsky, AND Rachel M. Layman. PD13-05 Updated results of a Phase 1b study of gedatolisib plus palbociclib and endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer: Subgroup analysis by PIK3CA mutation status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-05.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and one of the leading causes of cancer death in women. Despite significant therapeutic advances, the majority of patients with unresectable or recurrent/metastatic disease eventually develop resistance to available standard of care (SOC) therapies. B7-H4 is a poor prognostic factor and is overexpressed in several cancers including endometrial, ovarian, and breast. As a member of the CD28/B7 family of cell surface proteins, it promotes tumorigenesis by suppressing anti-tumor immunity. XMT-1660 is a B7-H4-targeted Dolasynthen antibody drug conjugate with a precise, optimized drug-to-antibody ratio and a DolaLock microtubule inhibitor payload with controlled bystander effect. In the preclinical setting, XMT-1660 has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in TNBC and ER+/HER2- patient-derived xenograft mouse models, which included tumors from heavily pre-treated patients (Collins et al, AACR 2022). Increased anti-tumor activity tended to be more frequent in models with higher B7-H4 expression, providing rationale for a Ph1 clinical trial. Methods: The Ph1 trial includes a first-in-human open-label dose escalation (DES) portion followed by dose expansion (EXP) evaluating XMT-1660 in patients with BC, EC, and OC following progression on SOC as applicable (i.e., CDK4/6i + ET; platinum-based chemotherapy). In the DES, Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design will be used to determine the MTD. Patients will receive XMT-1660 IV Q3 weeks. Primary endpoints in DES are to assess safety and determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and assessment of preliminary efficacy as a secondary endpoint. In the EXP portion, cohorts enrolling TNBC, ER+/HER2- BC, EC/OC are planned and additional patients may be enrolled based on emerging data. The primary endpoint of EXP is to assess safety and tolerability, overall response rate, disease control rate, and duration of response. Secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetic analysis and antidrug antibodies. Patients are not selected by B7-H4 status, but baseline tumors samples are collected for retrospective tumor tissue evaluation. The trial is currently enrolling patients. NCT05377996 Citation Format: Erika Hamilton, Arvind Chaudhry, Alexander I. Spira, Sylvia Adams, Nour Abuhadra, Antonio Giordano, Ritesh Parajuli, Hyo S. Han, Amy Weise, Aubri Marchesani, Kate Josephs, Chu Ri Shin, Kevin Kalinsky. XMT-1660: A Phase 1b trial of a B7-H4 targeted Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC) in Breast, Endometrial, and Ovarian Cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-01.

PURPOSE Adagrasib, a KRASG12C inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with KRASG12C-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). KRASG12C mutations occur rarely in other solid tumor types. We report evaluation of the clinical activity and safety of adagrasib in patients with other solid tumors harboring a KRASG12C mutation. METHODS In this phase II cohort of the KRYSTAL-1 study (NCT03785249; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03785249 ; phase Ib cohort), we evaluated adagrasib (600 mg orally twice daily) in patients with KRASG12C-mutated advanced solid tumors (excluding NSCLC and CRC). The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS As of October 1, 2022, 64 patients with KRASG12C-mutated solid tumors were enrolled and 63 patients treated (median follow-up, 16.8 months). The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 2. Among 57 patients with measurable disease at baseline, objective responses were observed in 20 (35.1%) patients (all partial responses), including 7/21 (33.3%) responses in pancreatic and 5/12 (41.7%) in biliary tract cancers. The median duration of response was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 7.3) and median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 8.6). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade were observed in 96.8% of patients and grade 3 to 4 in 27.0%; there were no grade 5 TRAEs. TRAEs did not lead to treatment discontinuation in any patients. CONCLUSION Adagrasib demonstrates encouraging clinical activity and is well tolerated in this rare cohort of pretreated patients with KRASG12C-mutated solid tumors.

Mobocertinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor targeting EGFR gene mutations, including exon 20 insertions (EGFRex20ins), in non–small cell lung cancer, was evaluated in a phase I/II dose-escalation/expansion trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02716116). Dose escalation identified 160 mg/d as the recommended phase 2 dose and maximum tolerated dose. Among 136 patients treated with 160 mg/d, the most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAE; >25%) were diarrhea (83%), nausea (43%), rash (33%), and vomiting (26%), with diarrhea (21%) the only grade ≥3 TRAE >5%. Among 28 EGFRex20ins patients treated at 160 mg/d, the investigator-assessed confirmed response rate was 43% (12/28; 95% confidence interval, 24%–63%) with median duration of response of 14 months (5.0–not reached) and median progression-free survival of 7.3 months (4.4–15.6). Mobocertinib demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with diverse EGFRex20ins variants with a safety profile consistent with other EGFR inhibitors.Significance:No oral EGFR-targeted therapies are currently approved for patients with EGFRex20ins NSCLC. Mobocertinib demonstrated antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced EGFRex20ins NSCLC in this study, supporting additional development of mobocertinib in this patient population.See related commentary by Pacheco, p. 1617.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1601

PURPOSE:People with cancer are at increased risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. ASCO's COVID-19 registry promotes systematic data collection across US oncology practices.METHODS:Participating practices enter data on patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer treatment. In this analysis, we focus on all patients with hematologic or regional or metastatic solid tumor malignancies. Primary outcomes are 30- and 90-day mortality rates and change over time.RESULTS:Thirty-eight practices provided data for 453 patients from April to October 2020. Sixty-two percent had regional or metastatic solid tumors. Median age was 64 years. Forty-three percent were current or previous cigarette users. Patients with B-cell malignancies age 61-70 years had twice mortality risk (hazard ratio = 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3 to 3.3]) and those age > 70 years had 4.5 times mortality risk (95% CI, 1.8 to 11.1) compared with patients age ≤ 60 years. Association between survival and age was not significant in patients with metastatic solid tumors ( P = .12). Tobacco users had 30-day mortality estimate of 21% compared with 11% for never users (log-rank P = .005). Patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 before June 2020 had 30-day mortality rate of 20% (95% CI, 14% to 25%) compared with 13% (8% to 18%) for those diagnosed in or after June 2020 ( P = .08). The 90-day mortality rate for pre-June patients was 28% (21% to 34%) compared with 21% (13% to 28%; P = .20).CONCLUSION:Older patients with B-cell malignancies were at increased risk for death (unlike older patients with metastatic solid tumors), as were all patients with cancer who smoke tobacco. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 later in 2020 was associated with more favorable 30- and 90-day mortality, likely related to more asymptomatic cases and improved clinical management.

Supplementary Table S2 shows LRRC15 IHC expression in tumor and stroma of patients with sarcoma treated ABBV-085 monotherapy at 3.6 or 4.2 mg/kg

Supplementary Tables and Figure

Supplemental Table S7. Primary PK parameters for spartalizumab

Figure S1 from Detection of NRG1 Gene Fusions in Solid Tumors

Purpose:The Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is a master regulator of mitosis and overexpressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We conducted a phase Ib study of the PLK1 inhibitor, onvansertib, in combination with either low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) or decitabine in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML.Patients and Methods:Onvansertib was administered orally, in escalating doses, on days 1–5 in combination with either LDAC (20 mg/m2; days 1–10) or decitabine (20 mg/m2; days 1–5) in a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was to evaluate first-cycle dose-limiting toxicities and the MTD. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics, antileukemic activity, and response biomarkers.Results:Forty patients were treated with onvansertib (12–90 mg/m2) in combination with LDAC (n = 17) or decitabine (n = 23). Onvansertib was well tolerated with most grades 3 and 4 adverse events related to myelosuppression. In the decitabine arm, the MTD was established at 60 mg/m2, and 5 (24%) of the 21 evaluable patients achieved complete remission with or without hematologic count recovery. Decrease in mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during the first cycle of therapy was associated with clinical response. Engagement of the PLK1 target, TCTP, was measured in circulating blasts and was associated with greater decrease in bone marrow blasts.Conclusions:The onvansertib and decitabine combination was well tolerated and had antileukemic activity particularly in patients with target engagement and decreased mutant ctDNA following treatment. This combination will be further investigated in the ongoing phase II trial.

Correlative biomarker analysis: 4A, Shift in balance of tumoral myeloid cells correlates with response. 4B, Baseline circulating AMC and ANC correlate with PFS 4C, High baseline circulating AMC:ALC is associated with disease progression and resistance to immunotherapy 4D, Baseline circulating PMN-MDSC in IOF and ION

Consort diagram

Supplemental Figure S2. Adverse events in crossover group

Supplemental Table S2. Chemotherapy regimens given to patients in the chemotherapy arm

Supplementary Figure S1 shows the study design.

Table S1. Descriptions of NRG1 Fusions Identified. *Novel fusion. Abbreviations: NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; GBC, gallbladder cancer (cholangiocarcinoma); CRC, colorectal cancer. RCC, renal cell carcinoma; NET, neuroendocrine tumor.

Supplementary Figure S2 shows LRRC15 RNA data from NanoString and clinical response in nonresponder (n=19) and responder (n=5) patients with sarcoma

Published manuscripts supporting 23 of the 26 approvals were retrieved (as of March 2020) and the eligibility criteria specifics for each trial were extracted from each manuscript.

PK/PD: Mean pepinemab serum concentrations for all patients dosed with 10mg/kg are presented in comparison to mean cellular SEMA4D levels (2A), total soluble SEMA4D levels (2B), and cellular SEMA4D receptor occupancy / saturation (2C). Cmax (2D) and AUC0-t (2E) is shown for each dose group as well as trough pepinemab levels at each 2 week Cycle (2F). PK parameters in D-F are reported as mean +/- SEM.

Supplementary Table S3 shows patient demographics and baseline characteristics

Supplemental Table S5. Adverse events ({greater than or equal to} 15% incidence of all grades events in any of the patient treatment arms)

Purpose:The CLASSICAL-Lung clinical trial tested the combination of pepinemab, an IgG4 humanized mAb targeting semaphorin 4D, with the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab to assess the effects of coupling increased T-cell infiltration and reversal of immune suppression via pepinemab with sustained T-cell activation via checkpoint inhibition.Patients and Methods:This phase Ib/II, single-arm study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pepinemab in combination with avelumab in 62 patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including immunotherapy-naïve (ION) patients and patients whose tumors progressed following anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy (IOF). The main objectives were to evaluate safety/tolerability, establish a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), obtain a preliminary evaluation of antitumor activity, and investigate candidate biomarker activity.Results:The combination was well tolerated with no major safety signals identified. Pepinemab, 10 mg/kg with avelumab, 10 mg/kg, every 2 weeks, was selected as the RP2D. Among 21 evaluable ION patients, 5 patients experienced partial responses (PR), 4 patients evidenced clinical benefit ≥1 year, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 81%. Notably, overall response rate with the combination therapy was higher than previously reported for single-agent avelumab in the PD-L1-negative/low population. Among 29 evaluable IOF patients, the combination resulted in a DCR of 59%, including 2 PR and 7 patients with durable clinical benefit of ≥23 weeks. Biomarker analysis of biopsies demonstrated increased CD8 T-cell density correlating with RECIST response criteria.Conclusions:The combination of pepinemab with avelumab was well tolerated in NSCLC and showed signs of antitumor activity in immunotherapy-resistant and PD-L1-negative/low tumors.

Purpose:In clinical research, eligibility criteria promote patient safety and optimize the evidence generated from clinical trials. However, overly stringent eligibility criteria, including laboratory requirements, may limit enrollment, resulting in delayed trial completion and potentially limiting applicability of trial results to a general practice population.Experimental Design:Starting in 2018, a working group consisting of experts in direct patient care, the FDA, industry, and patient advocacy developed recommendations to guide the optimal use of laboratory reference ranges and testing intervals in clinical trial eligibility criteria and study procedures. The working group evaluated current eligibility criteria across different clinical trial phases and performed a literature review to evaluate the impact of and justification for laboratory test eligibility requirements and testing intervals in clinical trials. Recommendations were developed on the basis of the goals of promoting safety and optimizing the evidence generated, while also expanding eligibility and applicability, and minimizing excess burden of trial participation.Results:In general, we found little variation over time and trial phase in laboratory test requirements, suggesting that these eligibility criteria are not refined according to ongoing clinical experience. We propose recommendations to optimize the use of laboratory tests when considering eligibility criteria.Conclusions:Tailoring the use of laboratory test requirements and testing intervals may increase the number and diversity of patients in clinical trials and provide clinical data that more closely represent the general practice populations.See related commentary by Giantonio, p. 2369

Supplement

Change from baseline in target lesion diameters: 3A, Spider plot of the change in the sum of target lesion diameters from baseline over time for evaluable immunotherapy naive patients (n=21). The lines are color coded based on best response; * pretracheal LN measured 8 mm at last scan resulting in a response of CR in the target lesion, but overall response of PR due to presence of non-target lesion. 3B, Spider plot of the change in the sum of target lesion diameters from baseline over time for evaluable immunotherapy failure patients (n=29). The lines are color coded based on best response.

Supplementary Table S1 shows inclusion and exclusion criteria for each treatment arm that enrolled patients

Figure S3 from Detection of NRG1 Gene Fusions in Solid Tumors

Detailed list of variants identified by targeted-NGS

Supplemental Table S6. Adverse events of special interest (patients treated with spartalizumab)

Purpose:No standard treatment exists for platinum-refractory, recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). This phase II study (NCT02605967) evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) of spartalizumab, an antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, versus chemotherapy, in NPC.Patients and Methods:Patients with nonkeratinizing recurrent/metastatic NPC who progressed on/after platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Spartalizumab was dosed 400 mg once every 4 weeks, and chemotherapy was received per investigator's choice.Results:Patients were randomized to receive either spartalizumab (82 patients) or chemotherapy (40 patients). The most common spartalizumab treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (10.3%) and pruritus (9.3%). Median PFS in the spartalizumab arm was 1.9 months versus 6.6 months in the chemotherapy arm (P = 0.915). The overall response rate in the spartalizumab arm was 17.1% versus 35.0% in the chemotherapy arm. Median duration of response was 10.2 versus 5.7 months in the spartalizumab versus chemotherapy arms, respectively. Median overall survival was 25.2 and 15.5 months in the spartalizumab and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Tumor RNA sequencing showed a correlation between response to spartalizumab and IFNγ, LAG-3, and TIM-3 gene expression.Conclusions:Spartalizumab demonstrated a safety profile consistent with other anti–PD-1 antibodies. The primary endpoint of median PFS was not met; however, median overall survival and median duration of response were longer with spartalizumab compared with chemotherapy.

Purpose:NRG1 gene fusions are rare but potentially actionable oncogenic drivers that are present in some solid tumors. Details regarding the incidence of these gene rearrangements are lacking. Here, we assessed the incidence of NRG1 fusions across multiple tumor types and described fusion partners.Experimental Design:Tumor specimens submitted for molecular profiling at a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)–certified genomics laboratory and that underwent fusion testing by anchored multiplex PCR for targeted RNA sequencing were retrospectively identified. The overall and tumor-specific incidence was noted, as was the specific fusion partner.Results:Out of 21,858 tumor specimens profiled from September 2015 to December 2018, 41 cases (0.2%) harbored an NRG1 fusion. Multiple fusion partners were identified. Fusion events were seen across tumor types. The greatest incidence was in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 25), though this represented only 0.3% of NSCLC cases tested. Other tumor types harboring an NRG1 fusion included gallbladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, neuroendocrine tumor, sarcoma, and colorectal cancer.Conclusions:NRG1 fusions can be detected at a low incidence across multiple tumor types with significant heterogeneity in fusion partner.See related commentary by Dimou and Camidge, p. 4865

Supplemental Figure S3. Best percentage change from baseline in sum of diameters of target lesions for patients treated with spartalizumab (A) and chemotherapy (B)

Figure S2 from Detection of NRG1 Gene Fusions in Solid Tumors

Supplementary Figure S3 shows T-cell infiltration in patients with breast cancer

Supplemental Table S1. Patient disposition

Purpose:Although PD-(L)1 inhibitors have shown efficacy in advanced/metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many patients do not respond to this treatment and more effective combinations with acceptable toxicities are needed. To assess the potential benefit of combining localized innate immune stimulation with checkpoint blockade, the TLR9 agonist DV281 was combined with nivolumab in a phase Ib study.Patients and Methods:Patients after one or two prior lines of systemic therapy were enrolled in a dose-escalation study with a 3+3 design. DV281 was administered via inhalation in five dose cohorts at 1 to 25 mg; nivolumab 240 mg was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. Safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and response to treatment were assessed.Results:Twenty-six patients with advanced NSCLC enrolled. Baseline programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was present in 16 patients (61.5%); 21 (80.7%) had received previous anti–PD-1/PD-L1. Thirteen patients (50%) had stable disease, nine (34.6%) had progressive disease, and four (15.4%) were not evaluable. Median duration of disease control was 124 days. Adverse events were seen in 16 patients (61.5%), mostly grade 1/2 chills, fatigue, flu-like symptoms, diarrhea, and rash; there was only one grade 3 adverse event (dyspnea). Pharmacodynamic assessment, measured by IFN- inducible gene expression, showed target engagement in all dose cohorts. Systemic pharmacodynamic responses plateaued in the 2 highest dose cohorts.Conclusions:DV281 with nivolumab was well tolerated with target engagement observed at every dose. Pharmacodynamic advantages at doses above 10 mg were unclear. The long duration of disease control in 50% of patients suggests clinically relevant activity in this population of heavily pretreated patients.

Supplemental Figure S1. CONSORT diagram

Background Loncastuximab tesirine has shown antitumor activity with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who were relapsed or refractory after ≥2 prior therapies, including activity in patients with high-risk disease characteristics. This analysis examined health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms, and tolerability in patients receiving loncastuximab tesirine for relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Patients and Methods The single-arm, open-label phase II LOTIS-2 study (ADCT-402-201; NCT03589469) enrolled 145 patients aged ≥18 years. Patients received loncastuximab tesirine as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using EQ-5D and FACT-Lym at baseline, day 1 of each cycle, and the end-of-treatment visit. Results During the course of treatment, EQ VAS overall health score was improved over time. The adjusted improvement was 0.65 per cycle (95% CI, 0.26-1.04; P = .001), and the adjusted mean change from baseline score was 5.00 (95% CI, 1.75-8.25; P = .003) at cycle 9, day 1. FACT-Lym total scores remained stable during treatment. More patients reported improvement compared to baseline in pain, lumps/swelling, and losing weight for a majority of visits. More than 60% of patients reported being "not at all" or "a little bit" bothered by treatment side effects for all treatment visits. Findings in elderly patients were similar to the population as whole. Conclusion The findings on HRQoL, symptoms, and tolerability further support the clinical use of loncastuximab tesirine for the treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Funding This work was funded by ADC Therapeutics SA. Authors affiliated with ADC Therapeutics SA participated in designing the study; in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting the data; in writing the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as osimertinib, have demonstrated efficacy in patients withPlain language summary Osimertinib is the standard-of-care treatment for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer caused by mutations in the EGFR. However, patients will eventually see their disease return because their tumors will develop new mutations that are resistant to osimertinib treatment. Amivantamab is a new antibody treatment that blocks the EGFR and another receptor called the MET receptor, to stop the growth of lung tumor cells. In an ongoing clinical trial, called the CHRYSALIS study, when amivantamab was given with lazertinib (another drug that blocks the EGFR), lung tumors shrank in patients whose lung cancer had not been previously treated. A new clinical trial called the MARIPOSA study (NCT04487080) aims to compare the antitumor activity and safety of the amivantamab + lazertinib combination versus osimertinib alone in patients with

Objectives Berzosertib (formerly M6620, VX-970) is an intravenous, highly potent and selective, first-in-class ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinase inhibitor. We assessed the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of berzosertib plus gemcitabine in an expansion cohort of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The association of efficacy with TP53 status and other tumor markers was also explored. Materials and Methods Adult patients with advanced histologically confirmed NSCLC received berzosertib 210 mg/m2 (days 2 and 9) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) at the recommended phase 2 dose established in the dose escalation part of the study. Results Thirty-eight patients received at least one dose of study treatment. The most common treatment–emergent adverse events were fatigue (55.3%), anemia (52.6%), and nausea (39.5%). Gemcitabine had no apparent effect on the PK of berzosertib. The objective response rate (ORR) was 10.5% (4/38, 90% confidence interval [CI] 3.7–22.5). In the exploratory analysis, the ORR was 30.0% (3/10, CI: 9.0–61.0%) in patients with high loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and 11.0% (1/9, 90% CI: 1.0–43.0%) in patients with low LOH. The ORR was 33.0% (2/6, CI: 6.0–73.0%) in patients with high tumor mutational burden (TMB), 12.5% (2/16, 90% CI: 2.0–34.0%) in patients with intermediate TMB, and 0% (0/3, 90% CI: 0.0–53.6%) in patients with low TMB. Conclusions Berzosertib plus gemcitabine was well tolerated in patients with advanced, pre-treated NSCLC. Based on the observed clinical efficacy, future clinical trials should involve genomically selected patients.

Background HER2 alteration (mutation and/or amplification) is associated with poor survival in NSCLC and can mediate resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Methods We retrospectively analyzed de-identified molecular information from 12,946 NSCLC samples that underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) with Caris Life Sciences. The objectives were to determine the prevalence and type of HER2 alterations with and without EGFR as a co-mutation. Insurance claims were utilized to obtain outcomes data. Results Three hundred and twenty-one patients (2.5%) had HER2 alteration: mutation in 197 patients and amplification in 134. Median age was 65 years and 62% were female. A total of 84% were adenocarcinoma. HER2 exon 20 insertion was most common (69%). A total of 1551 (12%) patients had EGFR mutations. Among samples with EGFR mutations, 24 (1.5%) had concurrent HER2 alteration (8 with HER2 mutation and 16 with amplification). Among 8 patients who had both EGFR and HER2 mutations, 3 had EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 8 HER2 mutation (S310F). One-third of the patients (7/21) with HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) mutation had co-occurring EGFR mutations. All 7 were S310. Patients with concurrent EGFR mutation and HER2 amplification had longer median time on treatment with EGFR TKI(s) than those with EGFR mutation without HER2 amplification (HR 2.284, P =.004). Conclusion A minority of NSCLC samples with EGFR mutations had HER2 alterations. In patients with both mutations, exon 21 mutations for EGFR and exon 8 mutations for HER2 were common. It will be critical to continue to accumulate valuable clinical data for further real-world outcomes analysis.

ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor; Brigatinib; Non–small cell lung cancer Inhibidor de la tirosina quinasa ALK; Brigatinib; Cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas Inhibidor de la tirosina cinasa ALK; Brigatinib; Càncer de pulmó de cèl·lules no petites Introduction In the phase 3 study entitled ALK in Lung cancer Trial of brigAtinib in 1st Line (ALTA-1L), which is a study of brigatinib in ALK inhibitor–naive advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, brigatinib exhibited superior progression-free survival (PFS) versus crizotinib in the two planned interim analyses. Here, we report the final efficacy, safety, and exploratory results. Methods Patients were randomized to brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-d lead-in at 90 mg once daily) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was a blinded independent review committee–assessed PFS. Genetic alterations in plasma cell-free DNA were assessed in relation to clinical efficacy. Results A total of 275 patients were enrolled (brigatinib, n = 137; crizotinib, n = 138). At study end, (brigatinib median follow-up = 40.4 mo), the 3-year PFS by blinded independent review committee was 43% (brigatinib) versus 19% (crizotinib; median = 24.0 versus 11.1 mo, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35–0.66). The median overall survival was not reached in either group (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.53–1.22). Posthoc analyses suggested an overall survival benefit for brigatinib in patients with baseline brain metastases (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21–0.89). Detectable baseline EML4-ALK fusion variant 3 and TP53 mutation in plasma were associated with poor PFS. Brigatinib exhibited superior efficacy compared with crizotinib regardless of EML4-ALK variant and TP53 mutation. Emerging secondary ALK mutations were rare in patients progressing on brigatinib. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions In the ALTA-1L final analysis, with longer follow-up, brigatinib continued to exhibit superior efficacy and tolerability versus crizotinib in patients with or without poor prognostic biomarkers. The suggested survival benefit with brigatinib in patients with brain metastases warrants future study.

PURPOSE Non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) exon 20 insertion (Exon20ins) mutations exhibits inherent resistance to approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell–directing activity, binds to each receptor's extracellular domain, bypassing resistance at the tyrosine kinase inhibitor binding site. METHODS CHRYSALIS is a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study, which included a population with EGFR Exon20ins NSCLC. The primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity and overall response rate. We report findings from the postplatinum EGFR Exon20ins NSCLC population treated at the recommended phase II dose of 1,050 mg amivantamab (1,400 mg, ≥ 80 kg) given once weekly for the first 4 weeks and then once every 2 weeks starting at week 5. RESULTS In the efficacy population (n = 81), the median age was 62 years (range, 42-84 years); 40 patients (49%) were Asian, and the median number of previous lines of therapy was two (range, 1-7). The overall response rate was 40% (95% CI, 29 to 51), including three complete responses, with a median duration of response of 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.9 to not reached). The median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.5 to 10.9). In the safety population (n = 114), the most common adverse events were rash in 98 patients (86%), infusion-related reactions in 75 (66%), and paronychia in 51 (45%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypokalemia in six patients (5%) and rash, pulmonary embolism, diarrhea, and neutropenia in four (4%) each. Treatment-related dose reductions and discontinuations were reported in 13% and 4% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Amivantamab, via its novel mechanism of action, yielded robust and durable responses with tolerable safety in patients with EGFR Exon20ins mutations after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy.