Search

Precise and timely detection of tuberculosis (TB) is crucial to reduce transmission. This study aims to assess the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on stool samples and systematically review the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra with different sample types by meta-analysis. Stool samples of smear-negative pulmonary TB (PTB), cervical lymph node TB, and abdominal TB patients were tested on the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra system. Meta-analysis was performed on a set of 44 studies. Data were grouped by sample type, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra were calculated. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra with stool samples was 100% for smear-negative PTB, 27.27% for cervical lymph node TB, and 50% for abdominal TB patients, with 100% specificity for all included TB groups. The summary estimate for all PTB samples showed 84.2% sensitivity and 94.5% specificity, and EPTB samples showed 88.6% sensitivity and 96.4% specificity. Among all sample types included in our meta-analysis, urine showed the best performance for EPTB diagnosis. This pilot study supports the use of stool as an alternative non-invasive sample on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for rapid testing, suitable for both PTB and EPTB diagnosis.

The Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rifampicin (MTB-RIF) is a technological innovation that presents precision and speed in the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). The study aimed to evaluate the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF in the TB diagnosis and compare its results with those of culture, species identification, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST), and rpoB gene sequencing of discordant results in AST, used for the diagnosis of TB in a reference laboratory.Cross-sectional descriptive study of pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples requesting Xpert MTB/RIF and culture for TB diagnosis from 2015 to 2019 at Adolfo Lutz Institute-São Paulo/Brazil. The analysis was performed with Epi-Info 7.2.1, presenting the distribution of frequencies and, for comparative analyses, Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used, considering P ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant. For variables agreement, the Kappa method was used.A total of 1575 pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples were analyzed using Xpert MTB/RIF and culture, of which 293 were positive for the MTB Complex in both methodologies with a sensitivity of 94.55%; specificity of 95.97%; accuracy 95.69%; positive predictive value 85.53%; negative predictive value 98.59%, substantial agreement by Kappa 0.87, and detection sensitivity even at lower levels of bacillary load (P0.05). The Xpert MTB/RIF and AST showed concordant results (P0.05).The study brings forward that the Xpert MTB/RIF shows substantial agreement with the results of culture and AST, contributing to the diagnosis of TB and the rapid detection of resistance. The sequencing of resistant cultures in Xpert MTB/RIF and sensitivity in AST identified the H526N mutation, characterized by a low level of resistance to RIF.

Objective To evaluate five examination techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoarticular tuberculosis (TB). Methods Microbiological samples were collected from a total of 284 patients during the period August 2017 to December 2019 in Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital. The specimens were examined by acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture, PCR, T-SPOT.TB, and X-pert MTB/RIF rapid molecular detection. Results The diagnostic sensitivity of the Xpert technology was 96.8% (116/120), specificity was 96.8% (58/60), the Youden index was 0.936, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.967. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR were 84.2% (104/128) and 95.2% (76/80), respectively; the area under the ROC curve was 0.881. T-SPOT.TB had a detection sensitivity of 75.0% (12/16) and specificity of 85.0% (17/20). AFB smear microscopy had a sensitivity of 60.0% (75/125) and specificity of 95.8% (152/159). TB culture sensitivity was 58.1% (72/124) and specificity was 96.2% (73/76). The sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF for detecting rifampicin resistance were 100% (2/2) and 97.3% (73/75), respectively. Conclusions The Xpert MTB/RIF technique was found to have a good diagnostic value. With an additional diagnosis of Rifampicin resistance, it was also useful in tuberculosis therapy.

This is the case of a 15-y-old boy who presented with fever and back pain with MRI features of spondylitis. A CT-guided vertebral biopsy showed acute and chronic inflammatory cells and grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa on aerobic culture. The child was treated for 2 wk with antibiotics with no response. Meanwhile, he developed new lung, liver, and splenic lesions on CT imaging. Empiric antitubercular therapy was then started and continued for 8 wk during which time there was progressive clinical deterioration. At this time the patient underwent bronchoscopy with lavage and endoscopic ultrasound-guided subcarinal lymph node and lung biopsy. The Xpert MTB/Rif ULTRA was "trace positive" in the bronchoscopic lavage with indeterminate rifampicin resistance, while it was negative in lymph node and lung biopsy. The lymph node and lung biopsy histopathology showed nonspecific inflammatory changes with no granulomas or malignant cells. In view of the positive Xpert ULTRA with indeterminate rifampicin resistance and no response to first-line drugs, treatment with second-line antitubercular drugs was initiated. The clinical condition continued to deteriorate; here the imaging findings were reviewed again and repeat aspiration cytology and biopsy from intra-abdominal nodes was carried out. This yielded the diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma. The patient had stage IVB disease. He responded well to standard chemotherapy and is currently in remission. The case illustrates the need to avoid empiric therapy, repeat invasive procedures if so needed, choose the site/method of biopsy appropriately and interpret results of investigations carefully when evaluating a patient with pyrexia of unknown origin.

Background Every year, at least one million children become ill with tuberculosis and around 200,000 children die. Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra are World Health Organization (WHO)‐recommended rapid molecular tests that simultaneously detect tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults and children with signs and symptoms of tuberculosis, at lower health system levels. To inform updated WHO guidelines on molecular assays, we performed a systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy of these tests in children presumed to have active tuberculosis. Objectives Primary objectives • To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra for (a) pulmonary tuberculosis in children presumed to have tuberculosis; (b) tuberculous meningitis in children presumed to have tuberculosis; (c) lymph node tuberculosis in children presumed to have tuberculosis; and (d) rifampicin resistance in children presumed to have tuberculosis ‐ For tuberculosis detection, index tests were used as the initial test, replacing standard practice (i.e. smear microscopy or culture) ‐ For detection of rifampicin resistance, index tests replaced culture‐based drug susceptibility testing as the initial test Secondary objectives • To compare the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra for each of the four target conditions • To investigate potential sources of heterogeneity in accuracy estimates ‐ For tuberculosis detection, we considered age, disease severity, smear‐test status, HIV status, clinical setting, specimen type, high tuberculosis burden, and high tuberculosis/HIV burden ‐ For detection of rifampicin resistance, we considered multi‐drug‐resistant tuberculosis burden • To compare multiple Xpert MTB/RIF or Xpert Ultra results (repeated testing) with the initial Xpert MTB/RIF or Xpert Ultra result Search methods We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) Registry up to 29 April 2019, without language restrictions. Selection criteria Randomized trials, cross‐sectional trials, and cohort studies evaluating Xpert MTB/RIF or Xpert Ultra in HIV‐positive and HIV‐negative children younger than 15 years. Reference standards comprised culture or a composite reference standard for tuberculosis and drug susceptibility testing or MTBDRplus (molecular assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance) for rifampicin resistance. We included studies evaluating sputum, gastric aspirate, stool, nasopharyngeal or bronchial lavage specimens (pulmonary tuberculosis), cerebrospinal fluid (tuberculous meningitis), fine needle aspirates, or surgical biopsy tissue (lymph node tuberculosis). Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy ‐ Revised (QUADAS‐2). For each target condition, we used the bivariate model to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We stratified all analyses by type of reference standard. We assessed certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Main results For pulmonary tuberculosis, 299 data sets (68,544 participants) were available for analysis; for tuberculous meningitis, 10 data sets (423 participants) were available; for lymph node tuberculosis, 10 data sets (318 participants) were available; and for rifampicin resistance, 14 data sets (326 participants) were available. Thirty‐nine studies (80%) took place in countries with high tuberculosis burden. Risk of bias was low except for the reference standard domain, for which risk of bias was unclear because many studies collected only one specimen for culture. Detection of pulmonary tuberculosis For sputum specimens, Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) verified by culture were 64.6% (55.3% to 72.9%) (23 studies, 493 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence) and 99.0% (98.1% to 99.5%) (23 studies, 6119 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). For other specimen types (nasopharyngeal aspirate, 4 studies; gastric aspirate, 14 studies; stool, 11 studies), Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity ranged between 45.7% and 73.0%, and pooled specificity ranged between 98.1% and 99.6%. For sputum specimens, Xpert Ultra pooled sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) verified by culture were 72.8% (64.7% to 79.6%) (3 studies, 136 participants; low‐certainty evidence) and 97.5% (95.8% to 98.5%) (3 studies, 551 participants; high‐certainty evidence). For nasopharyngeal specimens, Xpert Ultra sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) were 45.7% (28.9% to 63.3%) and 97.5% (93.7% to 99.3%) (1 study, 195 participants). For all specimen types, Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra sensitivity were lower against a composite reference standard than against culture. Detection of tuberculous meningitis For cerebrospinal fluid, Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity, verified by culture, were 54.0% (95% CI 27.8% to 78.2%) (6 studies, 28 participants; very low‐certainty evidence) and 93.8% (95% CI 84.5% to 97.6%) (6 studies, 213 participants; low‐certainty evidence). Detection of lymph node tuberculosis For lymph node aspirates or biopsies, Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity, verified by culture, were 90.4% (95% CI 55.7% to 98.6%) (6 studies, 68 participants; very low‐certainty evidence) and 89.8% (95% CI 71.5% to 96.8%) (6 studies, 142 participants; low‐certainty evidence). Detection of rifampicin resistance Xpert MTB/RIF pooled sensitivity and specificity were 90.0% (67.6% to 97.5%) (6 studies, 20 participants; low‐certainty evidence) and 98.3% (87.7% to 99.8%) (6 studies, 203 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). Authors' conclusions We found Xpert MTB/RIF sensitivity to vary by specimen type, with gastric aspirate specimens having the highest sensitivity followed by sputum and stool, and nasopharyngeal specimens the lowest; specificity in all specimens was > 98%. Compared with Xpert MTB/RIF, Xpert Ultra sensitivity in sputum was higher and specificity slightly lower. Xpert MTB/RIF was accurate for detection of rifampicin resistance. Xpert MTB/RIF was sensitive for diagnosing lymph node tuberculosis. For children with presumed tuberculous meningitis, treatment decisions should be based on the entirety of clinical information and treatment should not be withheld based solely on an Xpert MTB/RIF result. The small numbers of studies and participants, particularly for Xpert Ultra, limits our confidence in the precision of these estimates., Plain language summary Xpert tests for active tuberculosis in children Why is improving the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis important? In 2018, at least one million children became ill with tuberculosis and around 200,000 died. When detected early and effectively treated, tuberculosis is largely curable. Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra are World Health Organization‐recommended tests that simultaneously detect tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults and children with tuberculosis symptoms. Rifampicin is an important anti‐tuberculosis drug. Not recognizing tuberculosis early may result in delayed diagnosis and treatment, severe illness, and death. A false tuberculosis diagnosis may result in anxiety and unnecessary treatment. What is the aim of this review? To determine the accuracy of tests in symptomatic children for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis, tuberculous meningitis, lymph node tuberculosis, and rifampicin resistance. What was studied in this review? Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra, with results measured against culture and a composite reference standard (benchmarks), recognizing that neither reference is perfect in children. What are the main results in this review? A total of 49 studies were included. For pulmonary tuberculosis, we analysed 299 data sets including information describing nearly 70,000 children. For a population of 1000 children: Xpert MTB/RIF ‐ where 100 have pulmonary tuberculosis in sputum (by culture), 74 would be Xpert MTB/RIF‐positive, of whom 9 (12%) would not have tuberculosis (false‐positives); 926 would be Xpert MTB/RIF‐negative; and 35 (4%) would have tuberculosis (false‐negatives) ‐ where 100 have tuberculous meningitis (by culture), 86 would be Xpert MTB/RIF‐positive, of whom 59 (69%) would not have tuberculosis (false‐positives); 914 would be Xpert MTB/RIF‐negative; and 23 (3%) would have tuberculosis (false‐negatives) ‐ where 100 people have lymph node tuberculosis (by culture), 142 would be Xpert MTB/RIF‐positive, of whom 97 (68%) would not have lymph node tuberculosis (false‐positives); 858 would be Xpert MTB/RIF‐negative; and 5 (1%) would have lymph node TB (false‐negatives) ‐ where 100 have rifampicin resistance, 108 would have Xpert MTB/RIF‐rifampicin resistance detected, of whom 18 (17%) would not have rifampicin resistance (false‐positives); 892 would have Xpert MTB/RIF‐rifampicin resistance NOT detected; and 10 (1%) would have rifampicin resistance (false‐negatives) Xpert Ultra ‐ where 100 have pulmonary tuberculosis in sputum (by culture), 100 would be Xpert Ultra‐positive, of whom 27 (27%) would not have tuberculosis (false‐positives); 900 would be Xpert Ultra‐negative; and 27 (3%) would have tuberculosis (false‐negatives) How confident are we in the results of this review? We are confident. We included many studies from different countries and settings and used two reference standards. Some studies included only children at referral centres or did not report the setting. Therefore, we could not assess how the tests would work in a primary care setting. What children do the results of this review apply to? Children with presumed pulmonary tuberculosis, tuberculous meningitis, lymph node tuberculosis, or rifampicin resistance. What are the implications of this review? The results of the review suggest Xpert tests have the potential to be used to detect tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. ‐ The risk of missing a diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis confirmed by culture with Xpert MTB/RIF (in sputum) is low (4% of those whose Xpert MTB/RIF suggests they do not have tuberculosis) suggesting that only a small number of children with tuberculosis confirmed by culture will not receive treatment. The risk of wrongly diagnosing a child as having tuberculosis is slightly higher (12% of those whose Xpert MTB/RIF test suggests they do have tuberculosis). This may result in some of these children receiving unnecessary treatment. ‐ The risk of missing a diagnosis of rifampicin resistance with Xpert MTB/RIF is low (1% of those whose Xpert MTB/RIF suggests they do not have rifampicin resistance) suggesting that only a small number of children with tuberculosis will not receive the appropriate treatment. The risk of wrongly diagnosing a child as rifampicin resistance tuberculosis is higher (17% of those whose Xpert MTB/RIF test suggests they do have rifampicin resistance). This may result in some of these children receiving unnecessary treatment. How up‐to‐date is this review? To 29 April 2019.

Diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis (TB) is challenging. Xpert MTB/RIF and the new version Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) are molecular tests currently used to rapidly identify the infection. We reviewed the literature for the accuracy of Ultra assay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in children. We conducted a full search in PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Embase, and Scopus, up to April 2021. A bivariate random-effects model was used to determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity of Ultra, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), compared with culturing and the composite reference standard (CRS). In the ten included studies (2,427 participants), the pooled Ultra sensitivity and specificity, in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), were 78% (95% CI, 73-82) and 92% (95% CI, 91-94), respectively, against culture. Since a high heterogeneity was found between studies, we created subgroups based on different samples and ages. Ultra-pooled sensitivity was consistently lower against CRS (95% CI, 35%, 32-38). Compared to Xpert MTB/RIF, Ultra sensitivity tended toward higher values (Ultra: 73%, 67%-78% vs. Xpert MTB/RIF: 66%, 60%-72%), but specificity was lower (Ultra: 95%, 94%-96% vs. Xpert MTB/RIF: 99%, 98%-99%). Ultra has improved the definitive diagnosis of PTB, particularly in subjects with paucibacillary TB, including children. The lower specificity could be due to the fact that culture is an imperfect reference standard. Further studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of Ultra in the diagnosis of childhood TB.

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected people worldwide. Currently there are no studies examining the use of Rifabutin (RBN) and Dolutegravir (DTG) in co-infected persons. This is a case series of 4 co-infected patients receiving both agents who underwent Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. Methods and Results: This is a retrospective chart review study of four patients diagnosed with both HIV and TB, receiving RBN and DTG and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring. All 4 cases had lower than expected DTG concentrations at least once, including those on the current recommended dose of DTG with RBN, and even those receiving higher doses. Conclusions: Given the frequency of low DTG and RBN concentrations, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for these drugs is advisable. Prospective clinical studies are needed to further determine the PK interactions between RBN and DTG, and virologic response to treatment.

Due to the probability of decreased specificity, the practical value of performing the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) assay over the Xpert assay for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and rifampicin (RIF) resistance in a high TB burden setting was evaluated. Participants were recruited consecutively in three tertiary hospitals in China and allocated to the TB case detection and/or rifampicin (RIF) resistance detection group. Each sputum specimen was subjected to smear, MGIT960 liquid culture, and Xpert, and Xpert Ultra assay in parallel. Drug susceptibility testing was conducted for all recovered isolates in the RIF resistance detection group. In total, 1,079 patients were recruited to the case detection group and 450 to the RIF resistance detection group. Xpert Ultra had higher sensitivity than Xpert (92.26%, 322/349 versus 89.40%, 312/349

Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampin (MTB/RIF) Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) has shown better sensitivity in comparison with Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) in extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB), whereas the head-to-head comparison of these methods in TB lymphadenitis had barely been performed.Patients with undiagnosed lymphadenopathy were recruited prospectively and consecutively, and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy or lymph node tissue was collected. The specimen was subjected to smear, culture, Xpert, and Xpert-Ultra assays. Culture and/or smear for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) or AFB observed on histopathology were performed as a reference.A total of 106 participants were recruited, including 41 confirmed TB, 33 probable TB, and 32 non-TB lymphadenopathies. The head-to-head comparison for MTB detection showed that Xpert-Ultra produced the highest sensitivity when compared with smear, culture, and Xpert (75.7% vs 5.4 %, 13.5%, and 48.7%). When Xpert-Ultra outcomes were integrated for diagnosis, the percentage of confirmed TB lymphadenitis cases increased from 55.4% (41/74) to 85.1% (63/74). The sensitivities of Xpert-Ultra and Xpert on tissue were 73.6% (95% CI: 59.4-84.3) and 39.6% (95% CI: 26.8-54.0), respectively. The sensitivity of Xpert-Ultra on FNA samples (81.0%, 95% CI: 57.4-93.7) was higher than that of Xpert (71.4%, 95% CI: 47.7-87.8).Xpert-Ultra detected significantly more TB lymphadenitis cases than Xpert or culture. This superiority was particularly distinct using lymph node tissue than FNA detection.

Summary Objective To improve tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in prison, we evaluate the value of the XpertⓇMTB/RIF Ultra assay (Xpert) as point-of-care (POC) in a French prison hospital. Methods We first validated Xpert use on raw sputum at the referent laboratory. Secondly, trained physicians at the prison hospital performed Xpert tests for each patient presenting TB symptoms. The results were compared with Xpert, microscopic examination, culture and drug susceptibility testing on the corresponding decontaminated specimens. Results 76 inmates were included in 15 months and 21 were diagnosed with TB. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of Xpert were respectively: 92.3%, 100%, 100% and 98.7% on raw sputum. The efficiency of the molecular POC was confirmed by a concordance of 97% between Xpert findings from the prison hospital and culture results. Delay of microbiological diagnosis was reduced by about 18 days for 13 inmates with smear-negative sputum that avoid the mobilization of major means (escort, transport) to perform fibroscopic samples. Repeated Xpert negative results helped to speed the lifting of inmate isolation. Conclusions The implementation of Xpert in prison could optimize the management of incarcerated patients and thus limit the spread of TB among inmates, carers and other staff.

Objectives Anti-TB drugs-isoniazid and rifampicin induced hepatotoxicity present a significant clinical problem. We aimed to evaluate the beneficial effect of gallic acid in anti-TB drug-induced liver injury in vivo and for the mechanism of action, we explored the influence of gallic acid on Nrf2 and NF-κB pathways. Methods We assessed serum liver function tests and histopathological analysis for the preventive effect of gallic acid on liver injury. For exploring the beneficial mechanism, we studied Nrf2 and NF-κB signalling pathways using molecular assays. Subsequently, we conducted in vitro cytotoxicity assays with Nrf2(ML385) and NF-κB(BAY 11–7085) antagonists. Key findings Gallic acid co-administration attenuated the elevation of liver function enzymes, hepatic necrosis and inflammation compared to the anti-TB drug treatment alone. Mechanistic investigations reveal that gallic acid increased Nrf2 activation and induction of its downstream targets, preventing cytotoxicity by isoniazid and rifampicin. The protective effect of gallic acid diminished in the presence of Nrf2 antagonists in vitro. Furthermore, we found that gallic acid treatment inhibited NF-κB/TLR-4 axis upregulated by the anti-TB drugs. Conclusions Gallic acid is effective in preventing isoniazid and rifampicin induced hepatotoxicity in vivo by improving the redox homeostasis by activating Nrf2 and inhibiting NF-κB signalling pathways.

Tuberculous (TB) meningitis (TBM), accounting for 70-80% of cases of neurotuberculosis, is one of the most severe forms of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Two-thirds of new TB cases come from eight countries. Polymorphisms in toll-interleukin-1 receptor domain and in leukotriene A4 hydrolase (LTA4H) gene, affect the risk of inflammation in TBM. The common site of tuberculoma in children is cerebellum, and they may rarely develop tuberculous encephalopathy which has a high mortality. Young females with a high cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein have an increased predisposition to develop optochiasmatic arachnoiditis. Spinal TB meningitis may mimic transverse myelitis or Guillain-Barre syndrome. An extra-neural focus of TB should be sought clinically and radiologically as it may indicate safer and more accessible sites for diagnostic samplings. Cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test (CBNAAT), also known as Genexpert test, is a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method for detection of TB which also detects rifampicin resistance as it targets the rpob gene of mycobacteria. Line probe assays, based on PCR and reverse hybridization methods, identify mutations associated with drug resistance within a week. TBM being a paucibacillary disease, often evades a definite diagnosis and empirical treatment for a minimum of 9 months is warranted based on clinical judgement. All TBM patients should receive adjunctive corticosteroids, even those with HIV infection. Drug resistance is strongly associated with previous treatment and bedaquiline as well as delamanid have received approvals for multidrug resistant (MDR) TB. The key principle of managing MDR TB is never to add a single drug to a failing regimen. Correct combination and duration of most effective second line drugs in MDR TB require further modifications. Early shunting should be considered in those with hydrocephalus failing medical management. The single most important determinant of outcome is the stage of TBM at which treatment has been started.

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of stool-based Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay versus other assays for the detection of paediatric pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB).A prospective head-to-head comparative study was conducted from Dec 2017 to May 2019 in Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre. Samples were collected from children (15 years) with abnormal chest imaging (X-ray or CT scan) results for the following tests: Ultra on stool sample (Ultra-Stool), Ultra on respiratory tract sample (Ultra-RTS), Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) on RTS (Xpert-RTS), acid-fast bacilli smear on RTS (AFB-RTS), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) culture on RTS (Culture-RTS). The results were compared with a composite reference standard.A total of 126 cases with paired results were analysed. Against a composite reference standard, Ultra-RTS demonstrated the highest sensitivity (52%) and specificity (100%). Ultra-Stool showed 84.1% concordance with Ultra-RTS, demonstrating 45.5% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity (kappa = 0.65, 95% CI= 0.51-0.79). The sensitivity of Ultra-Stool was similar to Mtb culture (45.5%, p = 1.000) and higher than AFB-RTS (27.3%, p0.05). Assay positivity was associated with age and infiltration range in chest imaging.When RTS is difficult to obtain, stool sample-based Ultra is a comparable alternative.

We report the case of a 28-year-old resident doctor with no past history of having taken rifampicin, who presented with thrombocytoapaenic purpura occurring after the initiation of anti-tuberculosis therapy (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol) for tubercular lymphadenopathy.

Background A national drug resistance survey (DRS) was implemented for the first time in Timor-Leste (TL) in 2019. The primary objective of the survey was to assess the prevalence of drug resistance among new and previously treated pulmonary TB patients in the country. Methods This nation-wide cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2019 targeting all new and previously treated sputum smear-positive pulmonary TB patients. Sputum samples were submitted to the National TB Reference Laboratory for confirmation of TB and to determine resistance to rifampicin by Xpert MTB/RIF. Culture was performed on solid media, and culture isolates of confirmed TB cases were shipped to the WHO Supranational TB Reference Laboratory in Chennai, India for whole genome sequencing (WGS). Survey summary statistics, data cross-tabulations and analysis of potential risk factors of rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) were conducted using R statistical software (version 3.5.2). Results A total of 953 sputum-smear positive patients were enrolled, of which 917 were confirmed as positive for TB by either Xpert MTB/RIF or culture. An electronic web-based system was used for entry and storage of the data. Rifampicin resistance was detected among 0.6% (95% CI 0.2–1.3) of new cases and 2.7% (95% CI 0.5- 8.2) of previously treated cases. WGS was conducted for validation purposes on 65 randomly selected isolates (29% of RR-TB (2/7) and 7% of RS-TB (63/910) by Xpert MTB/RIF or pDST). The original test results agreed with the WGS validation results for 62/64 isolates (97%). Conclusion The prevalence of RR-TB in Timor-Leste is relatively low compared to the estimated proportions of RR-TB in the WHO South-East Asia Region (2.5% [95% CI 1.9–3.3] among new cases and 14% [95% CI 7.7–21] among previously treated cases). The rapid sputum collection and transportation mechanism implemented in the survey demonstrates its feasibility in low resource settings and should be replicated for routinely transporting TB specimens from microscopy labs to GeneXpert sites. Establishment of in-country capacity for rapid molecular diagnostics for both first- and second-line DST is an immediate need for achieving universal drug susceptibility testing (DST) to guide appropriate patient management.

Background\ud The World Health Organization (WHO) End TB Strategy stresses universal access to drug susceptibility testing (DST). DST determines whether Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria are susceptible or resistant to drugs. Xpert MTB/XDR is a rapid nucleic acid amplification test for detection of tuberculosis and drug resistance in one test suitable for use in peripheral and intermediate level laboratories. In specimens where tuberculosis is detected by Xpert MTB/XDR, Xpert MTB/XDR can also detect resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and amikacin.\ud \ud Objectives\ud To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/XDR for pulmonary tuberculosis in people with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis (having signs and symptoms suggestive of tuberculosis, including cough, fever, weight loss, night sweats).\ud \ud To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/XDR for resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and amikacin in people with tuberculosis detected by Xpert MTB/XDR, irrespective of rifampicin resistance (whether or not rifampicin resistance status was known) and with known rifampicin resistance.\ud \ud Search methods\ud We searched multiple databases to 23 September 2021. We limited searches to 2015 onwards as Xpert MTB/XDR was launched in 2020.\ud \ud Selection criteria\ud Diagnostic accuracy studies using sputum in adults with presumptive or confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis. Reference standards were culture (pulmonary tuberculosis detection); phenotypic DST (pDST), genotypic DST (gDST),composite (pDST and gDST) (drug resistance detection).\ud \ud Data collection and analysis\ud Two review authors independently reviewed reports for eligibility and extracted data using a standardized form. For multicentre studies, we anticipated variability in the type and frequency of mutations associated with resistance to a given drug at the different centres and considered each centre as an independent study cohort for quality assessment and analysis. We assessed methodological quality with QUADAS‐2, judging risk of bias separately for each target condition and reference standard. For pulmonary tuberculosis detection, owing to heterogeneity in participant characteristics and observed specificity estimates, we reported a range of sensitivity and specificity estimates and did not perform a meta‐analysis. For drug resistance detection, we performed meta‐analyses by reference standard using bivariate random‐effects models. Using GRADE, we assessed certainty of evidence of Xpert MTB/XDR accuracy for detection of resistance to isoniazid and fluoroquinolones in people irrespective of rifampicin resistance and to ethionamide and amikacin in people with known rifampicin resistance, reflecting real‐world situations. We used pDST, except for ethionamide resistance where we considered gDST a better reference standard.\ud \ud Main results\ud We included two multicentre studies from high multidrug‐resistant/rifampicin‐resistant tuberculosis burden countries, reporting on six independent study cohorts, involving 1228 participants for pulmonary tuberculosis detection and 1141 participants for drug resistance detection. The proportion of participants with rifampicin resistance in the two studies was 47.9% and 80.9%. For tuberculosis detection, we judged high risk of bias for patient selection owing to selective recruitment. For ethionamide resistance detection, we judged high risk of bias for the reference standard, both pDST and gDST, though we considered gDST a better reference standard.\ud \ud Pulmonary tuberculosis detection\ud \ud ‐ Xpert MTB/XDR sensitivity range, 98.3% (96.1 to 99.5) to 98.9% (96.2 to 99.9) and specificity range, 22.5% (14.3 to 32.6) to 100.0% (86.3 to 100.0); median prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis 91.3%, (interquartile range, 89.3% to 91.8%), (2 studies; 1 study reported on 2 cohorts, 1228 participants; very low‐certainty evidence, sensitivity and specificity).\ud \ud Drug resistance detection\ud \ud People irrespective of rifampicin resistance\ud \ud ‐ Isoniazid resistance: Xpert MTB/XDR summary sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval (CI)) were 94.2% (87.5 to 97.4) and 98.5% (92.6 to 99.7) against pDST, (6 cohorts, 1083 participants, moderate‐certainty evidence, sensitivity and specificity).\ud \ud ‐ Fluoroquinolone resistance: Xpert MTB/XDR summary sensitivity and specificity were 93.2% (88.1 to 96.2) and 98.0% (90.8 to 99.6) against pDST, (6 cohorts, 1021 participants; high‐certainty evidence, sensitivity; moderate‐certainty evidence, specificity).\ud \ud People with known rifampicin resistance\ud \ud ‐ Ethionamide resistance: Xpert MTB/XDR summary sensitivity and specificity were 98.0% (74.2 to 99.9) and 99.7% (83.5 to 100.0) against gDST, (4 cohorts, 434 participants; very low‐certainty evidence, sensitivity and specificity).\ud \ud ‐ Amikacin resistance: Xpert MTB/XDR summary sensitivity and specificity were 86.1% (75.0 to 92.7) and 98.9% (93.0 to 99.8) against pDST, (4 cohorts, 490 participants; low‐certainty evidence, sensitivity; high‐certainty evidence, specificity).\ud \ud Of 1000 people with pulmonary tuberculosis, detected as tuberculosis by Xpert MTB/XDR:\ud \ud ‐ where 50 have isoniazid resistance, 61 would have an Xpert MTB/XDR result indicating isoniazid resistance: of these, 14/61 (23%) would not have isoniazid resistance (FP); 939 (of 1000 people) would have a result indicating the absence of isoniazid resistance: of these, 3/939 (0%) would have isoniazid resistance (FN).\ud \ud ‐ where 50 have fluoroquinolone resistance, 66 would have an Xpert MTB/XDR result indicating fluoroquinolone resistance: of these, 19/66 (29%) would not have fluoroquinolone resistance (FP); 934 would have a result indicating the absence of fluoroquinolone resistance: of these, 3/934 (0%) would have fluoroquinolone resistance (FN).\ud \ud ‐ where 300 have ethionamide resistance, 296 would have an Xpert MTB/XDR result indicating ethionamide resistance: of these, 2/296 (1%) would not have ethionamide resistance (FP); 704 would have a result indicating the absence of ethionamide resistance: of these, 6/704 (1%) would have ethionamide resistance (FN).\ud \ud ‐ where 135 have amikacin resistance, 126 would have an Xpert MTB/XDR result indicating amikacin resistance: of these, 10/126 (8%) would not have amikacin resistance (FP); 874 would have a result indicating the absence of amikacin resistance: of these, 19/874 (2%) would have amikacin resistance (FN).\ud \ud Authors' conclusions\ud Review findings suggest that, in people determined by Xpert MTB/XDR to be tuberculosis‐positive, Xpert MTB/XDR provides accurate results for detection of isoniazid and fluoroquinolone resistance and can assist with selection of an optimised treatment regimen. Given that Xpert MTB/XDR targets a limited number of resistance variants in specific genes, the test may perform differently in different settings. Findings in this review should be interpreted with caution. Sensitivity for detection of ethionamide resistance was based only on Xpert MTB/XDR detection of mutations in the inhA promoter region, a known limitation. High risk of bias limits our confidence in Xpert MTB/XDR accuracy for pulmonary tuberculosis.\ud \ud Xpert MTB/XDR's impact will depend on its ability to detect tuberculosis (required for DST), prevalence of resistance to a given drug, health care infrastructure, and access to other tests.

Background Uganda introduced Xpert® MTB/RIF assay into its TB diagnostic algorithm in January 2012. In July 2018, this assay was replaced with Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra assay. We set out to compare the tests done and tuberculosis cases detected by Xpert® MTB/RIF and Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra assay in Uganda. Methods This was a before and after study, with the tests done and TB cases detected between Jan-June 2019 when using Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra assay compared to those done between Jan-June 2018 while using Xpert® MTB/RIF assay. This data was analyzed using Stata version 13, it was summarized into measures of central tendency and the comparison between Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra and Xpert® MTB/RIF was explored using a two-sided T-test which was considered significant if p Results One hundred and twelve (112) GeneXpert sites out of a possible 239 were included in the study. 128,476 (M: 1147.11, SD: 842.88) tests were performed with Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra assay, with 9693 drug-susceptible TB (DS-TB) cases detected (M: 86.54, SD: 62.12) and 144 (M: 1.28, SD: 3.42) Rifampicin Resistant TB cases (RR-TB). Whilst 107, 890 (M: 963.30, SD: 842.88) tests were performed with Xpert® MTB/RIF assay between, 8807 (M: 78.63, SD: 53.29) DS-TB cases were detected, and 147 (M: 1.31, SD: 2.39) RR-TB cases. The Number Need to Test (NNT) to get one TB case was 12 for Xpert® MTB/RIF and 13 for Xpert ®MTB/RIF Ultra. On comparing the two assays in terms of test performance (p = 0.75) and case detection both susceptible TB (p = 0.31) and RR-TB (p = 0.95) were not found statistically significant. Conclusions This study found no significant difference in test performance and overall detection of DS-TB and RR-TB when using Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra and Xpert® MTB/RIF assays. The health systems approach should be used to elucidate all the probable potential of Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra.

Prompt and accurate diagnosis of gastrointestinal tuberculosis (GITB) along with simultaneous detection of drug resistance is inevitable for tuberculosis elimination. Truenat MTB Plus (TruPlus), a chip-based real-time polymerase chain reaction assay, was evaluated for the first time for diagnosing GITB and detecting rifampicin resistance.Fifty ileocecal biopsy specimens (5 microbiologically confirmed GITB [culture-positive], 25 clinically confirmed GITB [culture-negative], and 20 control patients) processed in the Department of Microbiology between 2011 and 2021 were subjected to TruPlus assay, Xpert MTB RIF assay multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Their performance was evaluated against both culture and composite reference standard.The overall sensitivity and specificity of TruPlus in diagnosing GITB was 70% (21/30) and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity was 60% (3/5) for microbiologically confirmed cases and 72% (18/25) for clinically confirmed cases. Performance of TruPlus was superior to Xpert (sensitivity = 30%; P = 0.001) and comparable with MPCR (sensitivity = 83.33%; P = 0.13). Both TruPlus and MPCR had moderate agreement with reference standards, and MPCR detected additional three cases. Both TruPlus and Xpert correctly reported Rifampicin resistance in three cases.TruPlus, with its greater portability and higher sensitivity than Xpert, could serve as an important tool for diagnosing GITB and rifampicin resistance at outreach endemic areas.

A recent landmark trial showed a 4-month regimen of rifapentine, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin and isoniazid (PZMH) to be non-inferior to the 6-month standard of care. Here, two murine models of tuberculosis were used to test whether novel regimens replacing rifapentine and isoniazid with bedaquiline and another drug would maintain or increase the sterilizing activity of the regimen. In BALB/c mice, replacing rifapentine in the PZM backbone with bedaquiline (i.e., BZM) significantly reduced both lung CFU counts after 1 month and the proportion of mice relapsing within 3 months after completing 1.5 months of treatment. Addition of rifabutin to BZM (BZMRb) further increased the sterilizing activity. In the C3HeB/FeJ mouse model characterized by caseating lung lesions, treatment with BZMRb resulted in significantly fewer relapses than PZMH after 2 months of treatment. A regimen combining the new DprE1 inhibitor OPC-167832 and delamanid (BZOD) also had superior bactericidal and sterilizing activity compared to PZM in BALB/c mice and was similar in efficacy to PZMH in C3HeB/FeJ mice. Thus, BZM represents a promising backbone for treatment-shortening regimens. Given the prohibitive drug-drug interactions between bedaquiline and rifampin or rifapentine, the BZMRb regimen represents the best opportunity to combine, in one regimen, the treatment-shortening potential of the rifamycin class with that of BZM and deserves high priority for evaluation in clinical trials. Other 4-drug BZM-based regimens and BZOD represent promising opportunities for extending the spectrum of treatment-shortening regimens to rifamycin- and fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis.

This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF to detect tuberculous meningitis (TBM).PubMed and five other databases were systematically searched through March 2019. All studies evaluating diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were included. Reference standards were definitive or definite plus probable TBM. The quality of studies was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and calculated summary diagnostic statistics.We identified 30 studies (n = 3972 participants), including 5 cohort studies and 25 cross-sectional studies. Reference standards were definite TB (n = 28 studies) or definite plus probable TBM (n = 6 studies). The pooled Xpert MTB/RIF sensitivity was 85% (95% CI, 70-93%), and specificity was 98% (95% CI, 97-99%) with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.04-0.27) for definite TBM. For probable TBM cases, pooled sensitivity was 81% (95% CI, 66-90%), and specificity was 99% (95% CI, 97-99%). For both reference standard types, meta-analyses showed a C-statistic area under the curve of 0.98. The QUADAS-2 tool revealed low risk of bias as well as low concerns regarding applicability. Methodological heterogeneity was high among studies.Xpert MTB/RIF showed high accuracy for TBM diagnosis, but a negative Xpert MTB/RIF test does not rule out TBM. Repeat Xpert testing may be necessary. In clinical practice, Xpert MTB/RIF adds speed and sensitivity when compared to classic TBM diagnostic methods or previous commercial nucleic acid amplification techniques. More studies and better strategies for rapidly confirming a diagnosis of TBM in children are urgently needed.Cette revue systématique a évalué la précision diagnostique de Xpert MTB/RIF pour détecter la méningite tuberculeuse (MTB). MÉTHODES: PubMed et cinq autres bases de données ont fait l'objet d'une recherche systématique jusqu'en mars 2019. Toutes les études évaluant la précision du diagnostic de Xpert MTB/RIF sur des échantillons de liquide céphalo-rachidien (LCR) ont été incluses. Les étalons de référence étaient des MTB définitives ou définitives et probables. La qualité des études a été évaluée par l'outil QUADAS-2. Nous avons effectué une méta-analyse des effets aléatoires bivariés et calculé des statistiques de résumés diagnostiques. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons identifié 30 études (n = 3.972 participants), dont 5 études de cohorte et 25 études transversales. Les étalons de référence étaient la TB définitive (n = 28 études) ou la MTB définitive et probable (n = 6 études). La sensibilité poolée Xpert MTB/RIF était de 85% (IC95%: 70-93%) et la spécificité était de 98% (IC95%: 97-99%) avec un rapport de vraisemblance négatif de 0,15 (IC95%: 0,04-0,27) pour la MTB définitive. Pour les cas probables de la MTB, la sensibilité poolée était de 81% (IC95%: 66-90%) et la spécificité était de 99% (IC95%: 97-99%). Pour les deux types d'étalons de référence, les méta-analyses ont montré une aire statistique C sous la courbe de 0,98. L'outil QUADAS-2 a révélé un faible risque de biais ainsi que de faibles préoccupations concernant l'applicabilité. L'hétérogénéité méthodologique était élevée parmi les études.Xpert MTB/RIF a montré une grande précision pour le diagnostic de la MTB, mais un test Xpert MTB/RIF négatif n'exclut pas la MTB. La répétition du tests Xpert peut être nécessaire. Dans la pratique clinique, Xpert MTB/RIF ajoute vitesse et sensibilité par rapport aux méthodes de diagnostic classiques de la MTB ou aux précédentes techniques d'amplification d'acide nucléique commerciales. Des études supplémentaires et de meilleures stratégies pour confirmer rapidement un diagnostic de MTB chez les enfants sont nécessaires d'urgence.

The Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra is a recent advancement in molecular diagnostics of tuberculosis (TB) with higher sensitivity compared to its predecessor, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Prospective studies evaluating the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra in children with suspected TB are lacking. In this study, we evaluated the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in samples from 156 children, of which one was excluded from the analysis. Of the remaining 155 samples, 6·5% (10/155), 21·3% (33/155), 20% (31/155) and 21·9% (34/155) were positive by smear examination, MGIT culture, Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, respectively. The Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra had a similar overall sensitivity of 81·8% (95% CI: 64·5-93) and 84·8% (95% CI: 68·1-94·9), respectively. In suspected pediatric TB patients, the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra had higher sensitivity compared to the Xpert MTB/RIF (72·7 vs 63·6). The AUC (area under the curve) of 0·905 for the Xpert MTB/RIF and 0·893 for the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra indicate similar and good overall performance. Both Xpert assays were found to be equally efficient, however Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra showed better detection rate in suspected TB cases.

Objective: To evaluate Gene Xpert MTB/RIF and Multiplex PCRfor detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Rifampicin resistance comparing with gold standard MGIT 960. It was cross sectional validation study. Methods: This study had been carried out at Department of Microbiology Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), Rawalpindi Pakistan from March 2018 to October 2018.MGIT 960 culture system MTB positive Rifampicin (RIF) resistant and RIF susceptible (negative control) samples were taken. Gene Xpert MTB / RIF assay and Multiplex PCR were applied simultaneously and compared with gold standard MGIT 960. Results: Out of 192 samples evaluated, 84(44%) were culture positive RIF resistant and 108(56%) were culture positive RIF susceptible as negative control. Out of total culture positive RIF resistant, all 84 were found positive for MTB by Gene Xpert MTB /RIF assay and Multiplex PCR method. Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay detected all 84 RIF culture resistant samples for Rif resistance. Multiplex PCR detected only 44 RIF culture resistant, while remaining 40 did not showed resistance to rpoB gene codon 531 region. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV and NPV of Gene Xpert MTB/RIF were 100% each respectively. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV and NPV of Multiplex PCR for detection of RIF resistance were 52%, 100%, 100%, 72% respectively. Conclusion: Molecular detection of MTB and RIF resistant by Gene Xpert MTB/ RIF and Multiplex PCR simultaneously is rapid and cost effective method. Both methods can help clinician to initiate early empirical therapy to patient in resource limited region. Keywords: RIF, Gene Xpert MTB/ RIF, Multiplex PCR.

Considering the current recommendation of the World Health Organization to replace sputum smear microscopy with Xpert MTB/RIF as an initial diagnostic test for tuberculosis (TB), and that culture takes time to provide results, the cycle threshold (CT) of the Xpert test may be the only way to assess bacillary load. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association of bacillary load, measured by the Xpert CT, with the TB treatment outcomes. In cohort study, Xpert CT values were evaluated in cured and non-cured (failure and death) patients. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate if CT is independently associated with TB treatment outcomes. During this study period, 155 patients (84 cured and 71 non-cured) met the inclusion and were included in the analysis. The mean CT value for Xpert MTB/RIF test was 20.7 ± 5.6 in cured patients and 17.1 ± 5.6 in non-cured patients (p

Significance We previously reported that hibernation of 70S ribosomes in mycobacteria is induced as a response to zinc starvation. Because zinc limitation also induces ribosome remodeling, our findings raise questions about the conditions for ribosome remodeling and hibernation. Here, we show that the two processes are induced at different concentrations of zinc and that the caseinolytic protease system plays a crucial role in zinc-dependent inhibition of hibernation during remodeling. The findings offer insights into the molecular pathway underlying the transition from remodeling of ribosomes to hibernation in response to progressive zinc depletion in mycobacteria. This study is also a demonstration of reactivation of hibernating ribosomes by zinc. Finally, this study correlates ribosome hibernation with streptomycin tolerance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis during infection., Zinc starvation in mycobacteria leads to remodeling of ribosomes, in which multiple ribosomal (r-) proteins containing the zinc-binding CXXC motif are replaced by their motif-free paralogues, collectively called C− r-proteins. We previously reported that the 70S C− ribosome is exclusively targeted for hibernation by mycobacterial-specific protein Y (Mpy), which binds to the decoding center and stabilizes the ribosome in an inactive and drug-resistant state. In this study, we delineate the conditions for ribosome remodeling and hibernation and provide further insight into how zinc depletion induces Mpy recruitment to C− ribosomes. Specifically, we show that ribosome hibernation in a batch culture is induced at an approximately two-fold lower cellular zinc concentration than remodeling. We further identify a growth phase in which the C− ribosome remains active, while its hibernation is inhibited by the caseinolytic protease (Clp) system in a zinc-dependent manner. The Clp protease system destabilizes a zinc-bound form of Mpy recruitment factor (Mrf), which is stabilized upon further depletion of zinc, presumably in a zinc-free form. Stabilized Mrf binds to the 30S subunit and recruits Mpy to the ribosome. Replenishment of zinc to cells harboring hibernating ribosomes restores Mrf instability and dissociates Mpy from the ribosome. Finally, we demonstrate zinc-responsive binding of Mpy to ribosomes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and show Mpy-dependent antibiotic tolerance of Mtb in mouse lungs. Together, we propose that ribosome hibernation is a specific and conserved response to zinc depletion in both environmental and pathogenic mycobacteria.

Mycobacterium avium (Mav) causes chronic infections in immunocompromised patients that require long-term antibiotic treatment. We have previously shown that Mav takes residence in host Mϕs and establishes a compartment (MavC) in which it is hidden from host defenses. Failure to establish the MavC traps Mav in Lamp1+ phagolysosomes where growth is prevented, and inflammatory signaling activated through TLRs 7/8. To elucidate how antibiotic treatment affects mycobacterial trafficking and host defenses, we infected human primary Mϕs with Mav for 4 days prior to treatment with a macrolide, aminoglycoside, and ethambutol. We show that Mav is killed and the MavC fuses with Lamp1+ lysosomes following antibiotic treatment. However, this does not result in nuclear translocation of NF-κB or production of inflammatory cytokines, suggesting different Lamp1+ lysosomal compartments can form that differ in their innate signaling capabilities. Thus, we show that upon antibiotic treatment of a chronic infection, Mav is quietly disposed of by Mϕs.

Drug induced degradation of a target protein is a novel concept in drug discovery. Traditionally drugs modulate activity, as opposed to abundance, of their targets. Degradation inducing ligands act catalytically. Thus, one advantage of target degradation over the classical on-target mechanism is that lower drug concentration may be sufficient to cause the desired cellular effects. The first promoters of target degradation were discovered unintentionally: it turned out that some drugs ‘accidentally’ promote degradation of their target by the cellular proteolytic machinery. Elegant methods were developed to target specific proteins of interest for degradation, thus enabling the rational discovery of degradation inducers. The application of targeted degradation has so far been limited to human cells. Recently, we discovered that an antibacterial drug, the anti-tuberculosis antibiotic pyrazinamide, functions as a promotor of degradation of its bacterial target. Increasing antimicrobial resistance makes the discovery of novel antibiotics more urgent than ever. Can rational target degradation be applied for the discovery of anti-bacterials? Here, we first discuss briefly some historic examples and then recent approaches in rational target degradation for human diseases. Then, we describe how the first anti-bacterial target degradation promoter pyrazinamide triggers removal of its target. Efforts are under way to exploit this specific mechanistic knowledge for the discovery of next generation pyrazinamide. We end with the big - and open - question whether targeted protein degradation as an approach to anti-bacterial drug discovery can be generalized, similar to what has been achieved in the area of drug discovery for human diseases.

Tuberculosis represents a major global health problem for which improved approaches are needed to shorten the course of treatment and to combat the emergence of resistant strains. The development of effective and safe nanobead-based interventions can be particularly relevant for increasing the concentrations of antitubercular agents within the infected site and reducing the concentrations in the general circulation, thereby avoiding off-target toxic effects. In this work, rifampicin, a first-line antitubercular agent, was encapsulated into biocompatible and biodegradable polyester-based nanoparticles. In a well-established BALB/c mouse model of pulmonary tuberculosis, the nanoparticles provided improved pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The nanoparticles were well tolerated and much more efficient than an equivalent amount of free rifampicin.

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) may be different in the East compared to the West due to differing disease prevalence, prescribing patterns and pharmacogenetic profiles. To review existing literature on causative agents of DILI in the East compared to the West, a comprehensive literature search was performed on electronic databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure without language restrictions. Studies which involve patients having DILI and reported the frequency of causative agents were included. A random effects model was applied to synthesize the current evidence using prevalence of class-specific and agent-specific causative drugs with 95% confidence intervals. Of 6,914 articles found, 12 showed the distribution of drugs implicated in DILI in the East with a total of 33,294 patients and 16 in the West with a total of 26,069 DILI cases. In the East, the most common agents by class were anti-tuberculosis drugs (26.6%), herbal and alternative medications (25.3%), and antibiotics (15.7%), while in the West, antibiotics (34.9%), cardiovascular agents (17.3%), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (12.5%) were the commonest. For individual agents, the most common agents in the East were isoniazid-rifampicin-pyrazinamide (25.4%), phenytoin (3.5%), and cephalosporin (2.9%) while in the West, amoxicillin-potassium clavulanate combination acid (11.3%), nimesulide (6.3%), and ibuprofen (6.1%) were the commonest. There was significant heterogeneity due to variability in single-centre compared to multi-centre studies. Differences in DILI in the East versus the West both in drug classes and individual agents are important for clinicians to recognize. (Clin Mol Hepatol 2020;26:142-154)

Background Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus are both important global health problems now. Previous studies have drawn different conclusions about the impact of diabetes on drug resistance in patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis. Methods We conducted a systematic search in four databases: PubMed, EMBSE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The relative risk (RR) was applied to assess the association of diabetes with drug resistance and the STATA version 12.0 was used for data synthesis. Results A total of 13 studies involving 33,747 patients were included in our study. The pooled results revealed that presence of diabetes was significantly associated with isoniazid resistance (RR =1.22, 95% CI: 1.04-1.43) in patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis. However, no significant impact of diabetes on rifampicin resistance (RR =0.67, 95% CI: 0.41-1.11) or multi-drug resistance (MDR) (RR =1.28, 95% CI: 0.93-1.75) was observed. The results of subgroup analysis were similar to the pooled results. No significant publication bias for the results of MDR was found. Conclusions In patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis, diabetes is associated with isoniazid resistance. However, there is no significant impact of diabetes on the rifampicin resistance or MDR. However, these findings still need to be verified in the future.

BACKGROUND: India accounts for quarter of global rifampin-resistant/multi-drug resistant-tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB). Knowledge on risk-factors and distribution of MDR-TB at district level is limited. OBJECTIVE: Study prevalence and risk factors of MDR-TB in tuberculosis patients in hilly districts of Himachal Pradesh, India. METHODS: Between July 2012-June 2013, TB patients registered under the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program in Kangra and Una districts suspected of MDR-TB were referred for Xpert(®) MTB/RIF testing at the Delek Hospital, Dharamsala by the district TB Office. RESULTS: Of 378 patients enrolled (median age: 45 years; 85% males), 18% (n=68) were rifampin-resistant. Among Xpert positives (n=305), distributions of RR-TB were: 10% (n=9/89) for recurrent cases who had received TB treatment for

To address the most appropriate endogenous biomarker for drug–drug interaction risk assessment, eight healthy subjects received an organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B (OATP1B) inhibitor (rifampicin, 150, 300, and 600 mg), and a probe drug cocktail (atorvastatin, pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, and valsartan). In addition to coproporphyrin I, a widely studied OATP1B biomarker, we identified at least 4 out of 28 compounds (direct bilirubin, glycochenodeoxycholate‐3‐glucuronide, glycochenodeoxycholate‐3‐sulfate, and hexadecanedioate) that presented good sensitivity and dynamic range in terms of the rifampicin dose‐dependent change in area under the plasma concentration‐time curve ratio (AUCR). Their suitability as OATP1B biomarkers was also supported by the good correlation of AUC0‐24h between the endogenous compounds and the probe drugs, and by nonlinear regression analysis (AUCR−1 vs. rifampicin plasma Cmax (maximum total concentration in plasma)) to yield an estimate of the inhibition constant of rifampicin. These endogenous substrates can complement existing OATP1B‐mediated drug–drug interaction risk assessment approaches based on agency guidelines in early clinical trials.

A significant drop in tuberculosis (TB) case-finding has been widely reported during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. To address a decrease in TB notification, Belarus introduced laboratory TB testing in patients with the laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a secondary analysis of health records among 844 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis who were admitted to repurposed departments at TB hospitals and who were tested by Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in five Belarus regions between April and October 2021. Quantitative analysis followed by 13 individual interviews with health managers, physicians, and nurses participating in the intervention. Most patients were male (64%) and mean age was 43.5 ± 16 years. One in twenty (n = 47, 5.6%) patients were co-infected with active pulmonary TB, and over one-third of them (n = 18) had rifampicin resistance. In-hospital mortality was comparable in patients with and without TB co-infection (2.1% and 2.3% respectively, p > 0.99). Laboratory TB testing among patients with COVID-19 at repurposed departments of TB hospitals is feasible in Belarus and may improve TB case-finding.

Objective We compared diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) assays for diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), through systematic review and comparative meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed and Embase databases for publications reporting diagnostic accuracy of Xpert or Ultra for TPE. We used bivariate random-effects modeling to summarize diagnostic accuracy information from individual studies using either mycobacterial culture or composite criteria as reference standard. We performed meta-regression through hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) modeling to evaluate comparative performance of the two tests from studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of both in the same study population. Results We retrieved 1097 publications, and included 74 for review. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity for Xpert were 0.52 (95% CI 0.43–0.60, I2 82.1%) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–0.99, I2 85.1%), respectively, using culture-based reference standard; and 0.21 (95% CI 0.17–0.26, I2 81.5%) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.99–1.00, I2 37.6%), respectively, using composite reference standard. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity for Ultra were 0.68 (95% CI 0.55–0.79, I2 80.0%) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.97–0.99, I2 92.1%), respectively, using culture-based reference standard; and 0.47 (95% CI 0.40–0.55, I2 64.1%) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.95–0.99, I2 54.8%), respectively, using composite reference standard. HSROC meta-regression yielded relative diagnostic odds ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 0.65–2.50) and 1.80 (95% CI 0.41–7.84) respectively in favor of Ultra, using culture and composite criteria as reference standard. Conclusion Ultra provides superior diagnostic accuracy over Xpert for diagnosing TPE, mainly because of its higher sensitivity.

Background: Posterior oropharyngeal saliva (POS) is increasingly recognized as an alternative specimen for detecting respiratory pathogens. The accuracy of Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (X-Ultra), when performed on POS obtained from patients with paucibacillary pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is unclear. Methods: We consecutively recruited adults with symptoms suggestive of pulmonary TB who were negative by both smear microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF (X-Classic). Each participant was required to provide one bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and one POS specimen, respectively. Diagnostic performances of X-Ultra and X-Classic on POS were compared against clinical and mycobacterial reference standards. Findings: 686 participants meeting inclusion criteria were consecutively enrolled into the study. The overall diagnostic sensitivities of X-Ultra and X-Classic on POS samples were 78.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 72.8–83.8] and 56.4% (95% CI: 49.7–62.9), respectively; the specificities were 96.6% (95% CI: 94.3–98.1) for X-Ultra and 97.6 (95CI: 95.5–98.8) for X-Classic in POS specimens. Notably, the sensitivity of X-Ultra on POS was as sensitive as X-Classic on BALF against microbiological reference standard (78.9% VS 73.1%). Against clinical diagnosis as a reference standard, the sensitivities of X-Ultra and X-Classic on POS were 55.9% (95% CI: 50.5–61.2; 193/345) and 40.0% (95% CI: 34.8–45.4; 138/345), respectively. The risk of negative results with POS was dramatically increased with decreasing bacterial loads. Conclusions: The testing of POS using X-Ultra shows promise as a tool to identify patients with paucibacillary TB. Considering that bronchoscopy is a semi-invasive procedure, POS testing ahead of bronchoscopy, may decrease the need for bronchoscopic procedures, and the cost of care.

The imidazodiazepine, (5‐(8‐ethynyl‐6‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐4H‐benzo [f]imidazole[1,5‐α] [1,4]diazepin‐3‐yl) oxazole or KRM‐II‐81) is a new α2/3‐selective GABAkine (gamma aminobutyric acid A receptor potentiator) with anticonvulsant, anxiolytic, and antinociceptive activity in preclinical models. Reducing metabolism was utilized as a means of potentially extending the half‐life of KRM‐II‐81. In vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to evaluate metabolic liabilities. Incubation of KRM‐II‐81 in hepatocytes revealed sites of potential metabolism on the oxazole and the diazepine rings. These sites were targeted in the design of a deuterated analog (D5‐KRM‐II‐ 81) that could be evaluated as a potentially longer‐acting analog. In contrast to computer predictions, peak plasma concentrations of D5‐KRM‐II‐81 in rats were not significantly greater than those produced by KRM‐II‐81 after oral administra- tion. Furthermore, brain disposition of KRM‐II‐81 was higher than that of D5‐KRM‐ II‐81. The half‐life of the two compounds in either plasma or brain did not statis- tically differ from one another but the tmax for D5‐KRM‐II‐81 occurred slightly earlier than for KRM‐II‐81. Non‐metabolic considerations might be relevant to the lack of increases in exposure by D5‐KRM‐II‐81. Alternative sites of metabolism on KRM‐II‐81, not targeted by the current deuteration process, are also possible. Despite its lack of augmented exposure, D5‐KRM‐II‐81, like KRM‐II‐81, significantly prevented seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol when given orally. The present findings introduce a new orally active anticonvulsant GABAkine, D5‐KRM‐II‐81.

Background:\ud Rapid molecular methods such as the line probe assay (LPA) and Xpert® MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) have been recommended by the World Health Organization for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) diagnosis. We conducted an interventional trial in DR-TB reference centers in Brazil to evaluate the impact of the use of LPA and Xpert.\ud \ud Methods:\ud Patients with DR-TB were eligible if their drug susceptibility testing results were available to the treating physician at the time of consultation. The standard reference MGITTM 960 was compared with Xpert (arm 1) and LPA (arm 2). Effectiveness was considered as the start of the appropriate TB regimen that matched drug susceptibility testing (DST) and the proportions of culture conversion and favorable treatment outcomes after 6 months.\ud \ud Results:\ud A higher rate of empirical treatment was observed with MGIT alone than with the Xpert assay (97.0% vs. 45.0%) and LPA (98.2% vs. 67.5%). Patients started appropriate TB treatment more quickly than those in the MGIT group (median 15.0 vs. 40.5 days; p

Non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection has increased significantly in recent years, especially in emerging countries. We present the case of a 25-year-old male patient, immunocompetent, with cervical lymphadenopathy, identifying Mycobacterium kumamotonense, a rare species in extrapulmonary forms and with a high drug resistance index.

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by the

Background Assessing associated factors of pretreatment attrition and treatment delays among rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) patients could serve as a valuable tool to control and prevent its community spread. We assessed the factors associated with pretreatment attrition and treatment initiation delays among RR-TB patients in Lagos, Nigeria. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving secondary program data of RR-TB patients diagnosed using the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and initiated on treatment between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 in Lagos. Factors associated with pretreatment attrition and treatment initiation delay were determined using logistic regression. Results Of the 606 RR-TB patients diagnosed during the review period, 135 (22.3%) had pretreatment attrition. Previously treated TB patients had a 2.4-fold greater chance of having pretreatment attrition than new RR-TB patients (adjusted odds ratio 2.4 [95% confidence interval 1.2–5.0]). The median time to treatment initiation was 29 d (interquartile range [IQR] 18–49). It was longer for new RR-TB patients (49 d [IQR 36–59]) than previously treated TB patients (28 d [IQR 17–44]). A total of 47% had long treatment delays. Being newly diagnosed with RR-TB was associated with long treatment delays. Conclusions The pretreatment attrition rate and proportion of RR-TB patients with treatment delays were high. Pragmatic approaches to address the high pretreatment attrition and treatment delays in Lagos, Nigeria, are urgently needed.

Background There is limited research assessing the utility of the Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampin (MTB/RIF) assay for the analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in Chinese patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Thus, our objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and evaluate its utility for the determination of rifampicin resistance. Methods We retrospectively analyzed BALF from 214 patients with suspected PTB between January 2018 and March 2019. Using mycobacterial culture or final clinical diagnosis as the reference standard, the diagnostic accuracy of the smear microscopy (SM), tuberculosis bacillus DNA (TB‐DNA), Xpert MTB/RIF assay, and the determination of rifampicin resistance based on the Xpert MTB/RIF assay were compared. Results As compared to mycobacterial culture, the sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, SM, and TB‐DNA were 85.5% (74.2%–93.1%), 38.7% (26.6%–51.9%), and 67.7% (54.7%–79.1%), respectively. As compared to the final diagnosis, the specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, SM, and TB‐DNA were 100.0% (95.9%–100.0%), 94.3% (87.1%–98.1%), and 98.9% (93.8%–100.0%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the rifampicin resistance detection using the Xpert MTB/RIF assay were 100% and 98.0%, respectively, with liquid culture as the reference. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the analysis of BALF with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay provides a rapid and accurate tool for the early diagnosis of PTB. The accuracy of diagnosis was superior compared with the SM and TB‐DNA. Moreover, Xpert is a quick and accurate method for the diagnosis of rifampicin‐resistant tuberculosis and can also provide more effective guidance for the treatment of PTB or multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB)., The analysis of BALF with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay provides a rapid and accurate tool for the early diagnosis of PTB. The accuracy of diagnosis was superior compared to SM and TB‐DNA. Moreover, Xpert is a quick and accurate method for the diagnosis of rifampicin‐resistant tuberculosis and can also provide more effective guidance for the treatment of PTB or multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB).

Background Globally rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis disease affects around 460,000 people each year. Currently recommended regimens are 9–24 months duration, have poor efficacy and carry significant toxicity. A shorter, less toxic and more efficacious regimen would improve outcomes for people with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Methods TB-PRACTECAL is an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase II/III non-inferiority trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of 24-week regimens containing bedaquiline and pretomanid to treat rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Conducted in Uzbekistan, South Africa and Belarus, patients aged 15 and above with rifampicin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis and requiring a new course of therapy were eligible for inclusion irrespective of HIV status. In the first stage, equivalent to a phase IIB trial, patients were randomly assigned one of four regimens, stratified by site. Investigational regimens include oral bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid. Additionally, two of the regimens also included moxifloxacin (arm 1) and clofazimine (arm 2) respectively. Treatment was administered under direct observation for 24 weeks in investigational arms and 36 to 96 weeks in the standard of care arm. The second stage of the study was equivalent to a phase III trial, investigating the safety and efficacy of the most promising regimen/s. The primary outcome was the percentage of unfavourable outcomes at 72 weeks post-randomisation. This was a composite of early treatment discontinuation, treatment failure, recurrence, lost-to-follow-up and death. The study is being conducted in accordance with ICH-GCP and full ethical approval was obtained from Médecins sans Frontières ethical review board, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine ethical review board as well as ERBs and regulatory authorities at each site. Discussion TB-PRACTECAL is an ambitious trial using adaptive design to accelerate regimen assessment and bring novel treatments that are effective and safe to patients quicker. The trial took a patient-centred approach, adapting to best practice guidelines throughout recruitment. The implementation faced significant challenges from the COVID-19 pandemic. The trial was terminated early for efficacy on the advice of the DSMB and will report on data collected up to the end of recruitment and, additionally, the planned final analysis at 72 weeks after the end of recruitment. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02589782. Registered on 28 October 2015.

Diabetes mellitus has a negative impact on the treatment outcome of tuberculosis, increasing the incidence of treatment failure and relapse. There is a scarcity of knowledge concerning the impact of diabetes mellitus on the pharmacokinetics of rifampicin. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on the pharmacokinetics of rifampicin among patients with tuberculosis.We explored the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Scopus databases for articles that reported the pharmacokinetic parameters of rifampicin in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with tuberculosis published until September 2020. Based on the presence or absence of heterogeneity, pooled estimates were calculated using a random or fixed effect model.Seven studies were relevant and included in this study. The Tmax of rifampicin increased in diabetic patients with tuberculosis compared with nondiabetic patients with tuberculosis (MD 0.84, 95% CI (0.32, 1.35), p = 0.002). No significant differences were detected in rifampicin Cmax (MD 0.18, 95% CI (-0.52, 0.88), p = 0.61), AUC0-24 (SMD -0.02, 95% CI (-0.34, 0.30), p = 0.90), Vd (MD -3.89, 95% CI (-11.17, 3.38), p = 0.29), CL (MD -0.13, 95%CI (-0.88, 0.61), p = 0.72), and MRT (MD 1.89, 95% CI (-0.03, 3.81), p = 0.05) between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with tuberculosis.Diabetes mellitus increased the Tmax of rifampicin without further impact on other rifampicin pharmacokinetic parameters such as Cmax, AUC0-24, Vd, CL and MRT. Early therapeutic drug monitoring of rifampicin is necessary for diabetic tuberculosis patients.

Background Tuberculosis represents a public health problem, with extrapulmonary disease occurring in 15% of incident cases annually. Early diagnosis is a challenge due to its paucibacillary nature. Recently, a molecular real-time semi-quantitative assay (GeneXpert Ultra) was developed to overcome limitations of the previous assay version (Xpert MTB/RF). Objective The objective of the study was to assess the usefulness of the novel next-generation GeneXpert assay in extrapulmonary samples from different anatomic sites under routine diagnostic conditions at a university medical center. Methods A total of 519 samples from patients with presumptive diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB were subjected to smear microscopy, culture, and molecular assay. Univariate analyses for demographic and microbiological characteristics were performed. The sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa index with a 95% confidence interval were determined. Results Molecular assay was positive in 53 samples (10.2%), of which 38 (71.6%) belonged to the "low" and "trace" semi-quantitative categories. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 86.4% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 74.1-98.8) and 95.6% (95% CI: 93.7-97.6), respectively. Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing for rifampin was 100% concordant. Conclusions Molecular assay showed significant results when compared to other standard tests, making it a useful tool that could lead in the improvement to a rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary disease.