Search

AMEROTYPHLOPS MONTANUM SP. NOV. (FIG. 11; SUPPORTING INFORMATION, FIG. S4) Z o o b a n k r e g i s t r a t i o n: u r n: l s i d: z o o b a n k. org:act: BDB85DE5-C88C-4894-9197-60C3200FEC73 Holotype: An adult female, MZUSP 20065, (field number MTR 16379), collected by Augustín Camacho, José Cassimiro, Mauro Teixeira Jr., Miguel T. Rodrigues, Renata C. Amaro and Renato Recoder 6 March 2009 from Parque Nacional Serra das Lontras (15° 11 ′ 46.32 ′′ S, 39° 20 ′ 54.24 ′′ W; c. 234 m a.s.l.), municipality of Arataca, state of Bahia, Brazil (Fig. 11; Supporting Information, Fig. S4). Diagnosis: This species is distinguished from all other South American congeneric species by a unique combination of the following of characters: (1) nasal suture incomplete; (2) rostral scale oval; (3) supralabial scales four; (4) infralabial scales three; (5) rows scales around the body 20/20/18; (6) mid-dorsal scales 220; (7) ventral scales 217; (8) rows of dorsal scales dark brown 11; (9) rows of ventral scales yellowish cream and immaculate 7–9; (10) caudal spine dark brown; (11) subcaudal scales 11; (12) TTL 216 mm; (13) TL 5.32 mm; (14) contact between the nasal process of premaxilla and vertical laminae of the nasals restricted to the anterodorsal portion, with the central and posteroventral portions not in contact, leaving a large canal between the olfactory chambers; (15) smallsized palatine fossa on the lateral side of the maxilla; (16) maxilla with a straight medial border; (17) ventral pterygoid process of palatine straight; (18) ratio between length of ventral pterygoid process of palatine and skull length 0.06; (19) angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone close to 90°; and (20) dorsal surface of dentary bone without evident foramina. Amerotyphlops montanum differs from A. costaricensis, A. lehneri, A. microstomus, A. stadelmani, A. tasymicris, A. tenuis, A. trinitatus and A. tycherus by having an incomplete nasal suture (vs. complete nasal suture); from A. arenensis, A. caetanoi, A. amoipira, A. minuisquamus, A. paucisquamus and A. yonenagae by having20/20/18rowsscalesaroundthebody (vs.18/16/14, 18/18/14, 20/18/14 or 20/18/ 15 in A. minuisquamus and 18/18/ 18 in A. arenensis, A. caetanoi, A. amoipira, A. paucisquamus and A. yonenagae); from A. reticulatus by having highly pigmented cephalic scales with a dark brown dorsum and dorsum tail brown (vs. yellow and few pigmented cephalic scales, dorsum brown or black and dorsum tail black with cream or yellow spot); and from A. brongermianus by having a larger interorbital relative width (INORB/HWE) 0.725 mm (vs. smaller interorbital relative width, between 0.526 –0.705 mm). Table 1 shows additional morphometric characters and scale patterns found in A. montanum and in a morphologically similar species distributed in southeastern Brazil (A. brongermianus). Description of the holotype: Adult female, TTL 216 mm, TL 5.32 mm, MBD/(SVL-HR) 0.034 mm and TL/SVL 39.60 mm. Head slightly depressed dorsoventrally, not wider than ‘neck’. Snout round in dorsal and ventral views. Rostral oval, longer than wide, narrow at anteroposterior region and wider at medial region; visible in dorsal view, extending ventrodorsally without reaching the imaginary transverse line between anterior borders of eyes. Rostral contacting nasal (anterior and posterior) dorsolaterally, and first supralabial and anterior nasal scales ventrally. Nasal suture incomplete, only partially dividing the anterior and posterior portions of nasal scale. Suture begins in the upper edge of second supralabial, passes through nostril, but fails to reach rostral. Anterior nasal in contact with first infralabial and upper edge of second infralabial. Posterior nasal longer than wide, contacting upper margin of second supralabial and preocular. Supralabials four, fourth twice longer than third. Infralabials three, third largest. Eye diameter 1.03 mm; eyes not visible in ventral view, located dorsolaterally, close to suture between preocular and ocular scales, completely covered by ocular scale. Ocular scales contacting frontal. Body cylindrical and robust. Midbody diameter 7.12 mm. Dorsal and ventral scales cycloid, wider than long, highly imbricated and arranged in diagonal series; scale rows around the body 20/20/18. Mid-dorsal scales 220. Ventral scales 217. Cloacal plate rounded, bordered anteriorly by four rows of scales and posteriorly by five rows of scales. Subcaudal scales 11, excluding the terminal spine. Terminal spine large, stout base and dark brown. Skull osteology ( N = 1; MZUSP 20065): The length of the skull is 8.08 mm and the width is 4.14 mm. The snout region has a globular enlarged-shape and highly consolidated. The snout articulates with the braincase by the nasal and prefrontal sutures and with the frontal bone. The anteroventral region of the premaxilla has a short backward process.The midsagittal lamina separates both sides of the premaxilla (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla is confluent with the mid-dorsal laminae of the nasals and with the mid-dorsal ridges of the vomeronasal cupola of the septomaxillae (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla and the nasal laminae are restricted to the anterodorsal portion, with the central and posteroventral portions not in contact, leaving a large canal between the olfactory chambers (Fig. 5A). The medial side of the maxilla has a shallow depression (or fossa), where lodges the maxillary process of the palatine. The palatine fossa is on the lateral side of the maxilla, in the region of the articular fossa. The palatine fossa is small, with a diameter of 0.17 mm long (Fig. 5B). The medial border of the maxilla is straight (Fig. 6B). The ventral pterygoid process of the palatine is straight-shaped and ventrally directed (Fig. 7A). The retroarticular process projects in parallel to the horizontal plane of the articular. The angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone is close to 90° (Fig. 8A). The edentulous dentary is restricted to the distal end of the mandible, articulating mainly with the splenial. The dorsal side of the dentary is flat and without evident foramina (Fig. 9B). Coloration of the holotype in preserƲatiƲe: Dorsum (11/11/11 rows scales) dark brown, venter (9/9/7 rows scales) yellowish cream (Supporting Information, Fig. S4A, B). Dorsal portions of snout yellowish cream, with a dark brown spot, covering totally both rostral and nasal scales (Fig. 11A, B). Ventral portion of snout yellowish cream and few pigmented (Fig. 11C). Symphysial region yellowish cream and immaculate (Fig. 11C). Dorsal head scales (supraoculars, frontal, postfrontal, parietals and occipitals) and dorsal portions of lateral head scales (ocular, nasal and lower nasal) predominantly dark brown (Fig. 11A, B). Ventral portion of head scales (nasal and lower nasal) yellowish cream (Fig. 11A, C). Cloacal plate pale yellowish cream and terminal spine dark brown (Supporting Information, Fig. S4B). Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the neutral form of Latin adjective ‘ montanus ’. It is a reference to the type locality, a high elevational forest, located on the slopes of a hill summit in the Brazilian state of Bahia. Distribution and habitat: Amerotyphlops montanum is known from the Parque Nacional Serra das Lontras, situated at 10 km from the municipality of Arataca, in state of Bahia, Brazil, and from Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Serra do Teimoso, situated at 5 km from the municipality of Jussari, in state of Bahia, Brazil (Fig. 10B). These regions are known as part of the Serra das Lontras montane complex (Nacif et al., 2009), belonging to the Atlantic Forest morphoclimatic domain, in the Bahia Coastal forest ecoregion (Olson et al., 2001). The prevalent phytophysiognomy correspond to ombrophilous dense and semi-deciduous forests (Veloso et al., 1991;Amorim & epiphytes, with a well-established and preserved understory. The forest changes dramatically above 800 m, presenting stunted trees (10–15 m tall), covered with small bromeliads, heavy bryophyte and lichen growth (Veloso et al., 1991; Amorim & Matos, 2009; Reis & Fontoura, 2009). Additional data on the habitat of Serra das Lontras and Serra do Teimoso are, respectively, in Recoder et al. (2010) and Rodrigues et al. (2002). Remarks: In our phylogenetic analysis we included a sample from a specimen from the Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Serra do Teimoso, from the municipality of Jussari, in the state of Bahia, Brazil. Unfortunately, we did not have access to review this specimen, but we have recognized its molecular relationships with A. montanum. The tissue sample is currently stored in the genetic resource collection of Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo University (see Supporting Information, Table S2)., Published as part of Graboski, Roberta, Arredondo, Juan C., Grazziotin, Felipe G., Guerra-Fuentes, Ricardo Arturo, Da Silva, Ariane A. A., Prudente, Ana L. C., Pinto, Roberta R., Rodrigues, Miguel T., Bonatto, Sandro L. & Zaher, Hussam, 2023, Revealing the cryptic diversity of the widespread and poorly known South American blind snake genus Amerotyphlops (Typhlopidae: Scolecophidia) through integrative taxonomy, pp. 719-751 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 197 on pages 731-735, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac059, http://zenodo.org/record/7695978, {"references":["Nacif PGS, Costa OV, Araujo M, Santos PS. 2009. Geomorfodinamica da Regiao do Complexo de Serras das Lontras. In: SAVE Brasil, IESB, BirdLife, eds. Complexo de Serras das Lontras e Una, Bahia: Elementos naturais e aspectos de sua conserVacao. Sao Paulo: SAVE Brasil, 9 - 14.","Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D'amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. BioScience 51: 933 - 938. Doi: 10.1641 / 0006 - 3568 (2001) 051 [0933: TEOTWA] 2.0. CO; 2.","Veloso HP, Rangel Filho ALR, Lima JCA. 1991. Classificacao da Vegetacao brasileira, adaptada a um sistema uniVersal. Rio de Janeiro: Ministerio da Economia, Fazenda e Planejamento, Fundacao Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, Diretoria de Geociencias, Departamento de Recursos Naturais e Estudos Ambientais.","Amorim AM, Matos FB. 2009. A vegetacao do complexo de Serra das Lontras. In: SAVE Brasil, IESB, BirdLife, eds. Complexo de Serras das Lontras e Una, Bahia: elementos naturais e aspectos de sua conserVacao. Sao Paulo: SAVE Brasil, 16 - 25.","Reis JRM, Fontoura T. 2009. Diversidade de bromelias epifitas na Reserva Particular do Patrimonio Natural Serra do Teimoso - Jussari, BA. Biota Neotropica 9: 73 - 79. Doi: 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032009000100009.","Recoder RS, Junior MT, Cassimiro J, Camacho A, Rodrigues MT. 2010. A new species of Dendrophryniscus (Amphibia, Anura, Bufonidae) from the Atlantic rainforest of southern Bahia, Brazil. Zootaxa 2642: 36 - 44. Doi: 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2642.1.3."]}

AMEROTYPHLOPS MARTIS SP. NOV. (FIG. 12; SUPPORTING INFORMATION, FIGS S5, S 6) Z o o b a n k r e g i s t r a t i o n: u r n: l s i d: z o o b a n k. org:act: 0FDB6570-F072-4B5E-BE52-0BF93785AC88 Holotype: An adult male, MNRJ 18744, collected by Ana C. C. Lourenço and Délio Baêta between 2 and 8 September 2009 from Praia das Neves (21° 16 ′ 45.59 ′′ S, 40° 57 ′ 47.86 ′′ W), municipality of Presidente Kennedy, state of Espírito Santo, Brazil (Fig. 12; Supporting Information, Fig. S5). Paratypes: Three male specimens, MNRJ 18743, MNRJ 18745 and MNRJ 18747, collected in the same locality of the holotype by Ana C. C. Lourenço and Délio Baêta between 2 and 8 September 2009 (Supporting Information, Fig. S6A–F). Matos, 2009; Reis & Fontoura, 2009), with an elevational gradient ranging from sea level to more than 1000 m a.s.l., with an annual average of temperature between 23.3 and 23.6 °C and rainfall between 1300 and 1600 mm (Silveira et al., 2005; Amorim & Matos, 2009; Nacif et al., 2009; Reis & Fontoura, 2009). These areas have different levels of successional forests according to elevational gradients. Areas between 400 and 800 m, presenting a high and dense forest, with large height trees (taller than 30 m), a well-defined canopy structure, with abundant Diagnosis: This species is distinguished from all other South American congeneric species by the unique combination of the following of characters: (1) nasal suture incomplete; (2) rostral scale oval; (3) supralabial scales four; (4) infralabial scales three; (5) rows scales around the body 20/20/18–20; (6) mid-dorsal scales 208– 217; (7) ventral scales 195–211; (8) rows of dorsal scales pale brown 12–13; (9) rows of ventral scales yellowish cream and immaculate four to five; (10) caudal spine pale brown; (11) subcaudal scales ten to 12; (12) maximum TTL 170 mm; (13) maximum TL 6.13 mm; (14) nasal process of premaxilla contacting the vertical laminae of the nasals in the anterodorsal and posteroventral portions, with the central portion not in contact, leaving a large round canal between the olfactory chambers; (15) large palatine fossa on the lateral side of the maxilla; (16) maxilla with a concave medial border; (17) ventral pterygoid process of palatine straight; (18) ratio between length of ventral pterygoid process of palatine and skull length 0.06; (19) angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone close to 90°; (20) Dorsal surface of dentary bone with two evident foramina; and (21) hemipenis single, with an additional structure in the apical cup, with a tissue projection in the form of a curved papilla. Amerotyphlops martis differs from A. costaricensis, A. lehneri, A. microstomus, A. stadelmani, A. tasymicris, A. tenuis, A. trinitatus and A. tycherus by having an incomplete nasal suture (vs. complete nasal suture); from A. arenensis, A. caetanoi, A. amoipira, A. minuisquamus, A. paucisquamus and A. yonenagae by having 20/20/18 or 20/20/20 rows scales around the body (vs. 18/16/14, 18/18/14, 20/18/14 or 20/18/ 15 in A. minuisquamus and 18/18/ 18 in A. arenensis, A. caetanoi, A. amoipira, A. paucisquamus and A. yonenagae); from A. reticulatus by having pigmented cephalic scales with a pale brown dorsum and tail (vs. a yellowish and few pigmented cephalic scales, dorsum brown or black and dorsum tail black with cream or yellow spot); from A. montanus by having a smaller total length (TTL), between 130 and 170 mm (vs. larger total length 216 mm); and from A. brongermianus by having a small midbody diameter (MBD), between 4.090 and 5.133 mm and a single hemipenis with an additional structure in the apical cup, a large papillae projected laterally from the tip that extends horizontally over the proximal portion of the apical cup (vs. robust midbody diameter, between 5.03 and 14.76 mm and a single hemipenis with an unornamented apical cup). Table 1 shows additional morphometric characters and scale patterns found in A. martis and morphologically similar species distributed in southern and north-eastern Brazil. Description of the holotype: Adult male, TTL 157 mm, TL 6.13 mm, MBD/(SVL-HR) 0.032 mm and TL/SVL 24.61 mm. Head slightly depressed dorsoventrally, not wider than ‘neck’. Snout round in dorsal and ventral views. Rostral oval, longer than wide, narrow at anteroposterior region and wider at medial region; visible in dorsal view, extending ventrodorsally without reaching the imaginary transverse line between anterior borders of eyes. Rostral contacting nasal (anterior and posterior) dorsolaterally and first supralabial and anterior nasal scales ventrally. Nasal suture incomplete, only partially dividing the anterior and posterior portions of nasal scale. Suture begins in the upper edge of second supralabial, passes through nostril, but fails to reach rostral. Anterior nasal in contact with first infralabial and upper edge of second infralabial. Posterior nasal longer than wide, contacting upper margin of second supralabial and preocular. Supralabials four, fourth twice longer than third. Infralabials three, third largest. Eye diameter 0.90 mm; eyes not visible in ventral view, located dorsolaterally, close to suture between preocular and ocular scales, completely covered by ocular scale. Ocular scales contacting frontal. Body cylindrical and robust. Midbody diameter 4.86 mm. Dorsal and ventral scales cycloid, wider than long, highly imbricated and arranged in diagonal series; scale rows around the body 20/20/18. Mid-dorsal scales 215. Ventral scales 211. Cloacal plate rounded, bordered anteriorly by three rows of scales and posteriorly by five rows of scales. Subcaudal scales 11, excluding the terminal spine. Skull osteology ( N = 1; MNRJ 18743): The length of the skull is 6.52 mm, the width is 2.96 mm. The snout region has a globular enlarged-shape and highly consolidated. The snout articulates with the braincase by the nasal and prefrontal sutures and with the frontal bone. The anteroventral region of the premaxilla has a short backward process. The midsagittal lamina separates both sides of the premaxilla (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla is confluent with the mid-dorsal laminae of the nasals and with the mid-dorsal ridges of the vomeronasal cupola of the septomaxillae (Fig. 5). The nasal process of premaxilla contacts the vertical laminae of the nasals in the anterodorsal and posteroventral portions, with the central portion not in contact, leaving a large round canal between the olfactory chambers (Fig. 5A). The medial side of the maxilla has a shallow depression (or fossa), where lodges the maxillary process of the palatine. The palatine fossa is on the lateral side of the maxilla, in the region of the articular fossa. The palatine fossa is large (Fig. 6A), with a diameter of 0.27 mm. The medial border of the maxilla is concaveshaped (Fig. 6C). The ventral pterygoid process of the palatine is straight-shaped and ventrally directed (Fig. 7A). The retroarticular process projects in parallel to the horizontal plane of the articular. The angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone is close to 90° (Fig. 8A). The edentulous dentary is restricted to the distal end of the mandible, articulating mainly with the splenial. The dorsal side of the dentary is flat and pierced by two foramina (Fig. 9A). H e m i p e n i a l m o r p h o l o g y ( N = 4; o r g a n s f u l l y eƲerted and inflated): Hemipenis single, with a long cylindrical body and conical in the distal region (apical cup) (Fig. 13A–D); a tissue sheet extends from the lateral surface of the apical cup, it folds and runs transversely forming a curved papilla (Fig. 13A); the region between this flounce and the lateral sheet is deeper, forming a pocket on the sulcate side (Fig. 13A); internal surfaces of the flounce and the conical termination covered with smooth and shallow striations (Fig. 13A, B); sulcus spermaticus single, protruding over the surface of the hemipenial body, originating on the medial surface of the basal region of the hemipenis and running distally sinuously, reaching the flounce and draining to the pocket of the sulcate side (Fig. 13C); proximal region of the asulcate side of the hemipenial body with a transversal groove (Fig. 13D); medial region of the sulcate and asulcate sides (including the sulcus walls) covered with smooth and shallow striations (Fig. 13C, D). Coloration of the holotype in preserƲatiƲe: Dorsum (13/11/13 rows scales) pale brown. In the dorsal part of the body up to the tail, a fine darker brown reticulum, particularly concentrated in the central part of dorsal scales (Supporting Information, Fig. S5A). Venter (7/9/5 rows scales) pale cream (Supporting Information, Fig. S5B). Dorsal portions of snout pale cream, with a few light brown spots, covering partially both rostral and nasal scales (Fig. 12A, B). The ventral portion of snout pale cream and immaculate (Fig. 12C). Symphysial region pale cream and immaculate (Fig. 12C). Dorsal head scales (supraoculars, frontal, postfrontal, parietals and occipitals) and dorsal portions of lateral head scales (ocular, nasal and lower nasal) predominantly pale cream with few pale brown spots (Fig. 12A, B) and ventral portions pale cream (Fig. 12C). Cloacal plate pale cream and terminal spine creamy pale brown (Supporting Information, Fig. S5B). Variation of paratypes: Number of subcaudal scales ten to 12 (mean = 11, SD = 1, N = 3). Tail length 2.95– 3.20% of TTL (N = 3). Largest male with 170 mm TTL. MBD 4.09–5.13 mm (mean = 4.61, SD = 0.52, N = 3); number of mid-dorsal scales 208–217 (mean = 212.3, SD = 4.50, N = 3); number of ventral scales 195–208 (mean = 201.0, SD = 6.55, N = 3); and number of scale rows around the body 20/20/18 (N = 2) or 20/20/20 (N = 1). The colour patterns of the paratypes are similar to that found in the holotype (Supporting Information, Fig. S6A–F). Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the Latin name ‘ Mars ’, in allusion to the Mars symbol, used to represent the male gender. The choice of the name is a reference to the distinct hemipenial morphology of this species that differs from all other species of Amerotyphlops. Distribution and habitat: Amerotyphlops martis is only known from Praia das Neves, situated at 20 km from the municipality of Presidente Kennedy, state of Espírito Santo, Brazil (Fig. 10B). This region is considered as part of the Atlantic Forest morphoclimatic domain, in the Atlantic Coast Restingas ecoregion, a sandy plain located along to the coast of Brazil (Olson et al., 2001). The prevalent phytophysiognomy in Praia das Neves is heterogeneous, presenting an herbaceous, shrubs and arboreous forest usually distributed in parallels ridges to the shoreline (Braz et al., 2013), with an annual average of temperature and rainfall of 20 °C and 1561 mm, respectively (Peel et al., 2007). Praia das Neves has several different levels of successional vegetation, with areas close to the beach line presenting herbaceous and shrubby vegetation, with stretches of graminoid beach communities, changing the vegetation in the interior, where presenting a fragmented Ridge forest, with medium height trees (between 15 and 20 m), with lianas, epiphytes and herbaceous understory (Braz et al., 2013).

AMEROTYPHLOPS MARTIS SP. NOV. (FIG. 12; SUPPORTING INFORMATION, FIGS S5, S 6) Z o o b a n k r e g i s t r a t i o n: u r n: l s i d: z o o b a n k. org:act: 0FDB6570-F072-4B5E-BE52-0BF93785AC88 Holotype: An adult male, MNRJ 18744, collected by Ana C. C. Lourenço and Délio Baêta between 2 and 8 September 2009 from Praia das Neves (21° 16 ′ 45.59 ′′ S, 40° 57 ′ 47.86 ′′ W), municipality of Presidente Kennedy, state of Espírito Santo, Brazil (Fig. 12; Supporting Information, Fig. S5). Paratypes: Three male specimens, MNRJ 18743, MNRJ 18745 and MNRJ 18747, collected in the same locality of the holotype by Ana C. C. Lourenço and Délio Baêta between 2 and 8 September 2009 (Supporting Information, Fig. S6A–F). Matos, 2009; Reis & Fontoura, 2009), with an elevational gradient ranging from sea level to more than 1000 m a.s.l., with an annual average of temperature between 23.3 and 23.6 °C and rainfall between 1300 and 1600 mm (Silveira et al., 2005; Amorim & Matos, 2009; Nacif et al., 2009; Reis & Fontoura, 2009). These areas have different levels of successional forests according to elevational gradients. Areas between 400 and 800 m, presenting a high and dense forest, with large height trees (taller than 30 m), a well-defined canopy structure, with abundant Diagnosis: This species is distinguished from all other South American congeneric species by the unique combination of the following of characters: (1) nasal suture incomplete; (2) rostral scale oval; (3) supralabial scales four; (4) infralabial scales three; (5) rows scales around the body 20/20/18–20; (6) mid-dorsal scales 208– 217; (7) ventral scales 195–211; (8) rows of dorsal scales pale brown 12–13; (9) rows of ventral scales yellowish cream and immaculate four to five; (10) caudal spine pale brown; (11) subcaudal scales ten to 12; (12) maximum TTL 170 mm; (13) maximum TL 6.13 mm; (14) nasal process of premaxilla contacting the vertical laminae of the nasals in the anterodorsal and posteroventral portions, with the central portion not in contact, leaving a large round canal between the olfactory chambers; (15) large palatine fossa on the lateral side of the maxilla; (16) maxilla with a concave medial border; (17) ventral pterygoid process of palatine straight; (18) ratio between length of ventral pterygoid process of palatine and skull length 0.06; (19) angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone close to 90°; (20) Dorsal surface of dentary bone with two evident foramina; and (21) hemipenis single, with an additional structure in the apical cup, with a tissue projection in the form of a curved papilla. Amerotyphlops martis differs from A. costaricensis, A. lehneri, A. microstomus, A. stadelmani, A. tasymicris, A. tenuis, A. trinitatus and A. tycherus by having an incomplete nasal suture (vs. complete nasal suture); from A. arenensis, A. caetanoi, A. amoipira, A. minuisquamus, A. paucisquamus and A. yonenagae by having 20/20/18 or 20/20/20 rows scales around the body (vs. 18/16/14, 18/18/14, 20/18/14 or 20/18/ 15 in A. minuisquamus and 18/18/ 18 in A. arenensis, A. caetanoi, A. amoipira, A. paucisquamus and A. yonenagae); from A. reticulatus by having pigmented cephalic scales with a pale brown dorsum and tail (vs. a yellowish and few pigmented cephalic scales, dorsum brown or black and dorsum tail black with cream or yellow spot); from A. montanus by having a smaller total length (TTL), between 130 and 170 mm (vs. larger total length 216 mm); and from A. brongermianus by having a small midbody diameter (MBD), between 4.090 and 5.133 mm and a single hemipenis with an additional structure in the apical cup, a large papillae projected laterally from the tip that extends horizontally over the proximal portion of the apical cup (vs. robust midbody diameter, between 5.03 and 14.76 mm and a single hemipenis with an unornamented apical cup). Table 1 shows additional morphometric characters and scale patterns found in A. martis and morphologically similar species distributed in southern and north-eastern Brazil. Description of the holotype: Adult male, TTL 157 mm, TL 6.13 mm, MBD/(SVL-HR) 0.032 mm and TL/SVL 24.61 mm. Head slightly depressed dorsoventrally, not wider than ‘neck’. Snout round in dorsal and ventral views. Rostral oval, longer than wide, narrow at anteroposterior region and wider at medial region; visible in dorsal view, extending ventrodorsally without reaching the imaginary transverse line between anterior borders of eyes. Rostral contacting nasal (anterior and posterior) dorsolaterally and first supralabial and anterior nasal scales ventrally. Nasal suture incomplete, only partially dividing the anterior and posterior portions of nasal scale. Suture begins in the upper edge of second supralabial, passes through nostril, but fails to reach rostral. Anterior nasal in contact with first infralabial and upper edge of second infralabial. Posterior nasal longer than wide, contacting upper margin of second supralabial and preocular. Supralabials four, fourth twice longer than third. Infralabials three, third largest. Eye diameter 0.90 mm; eyes not visible in ventral view, located dorsolaterally, close to suture between preocular and ocular scales, completely covered by ocular scale. Ocular scales contacting frontal. Body cylindrical and robust. Midbody diameter 4.86 mm. Dorsal and ventral scales cycloid, wider than long, highly imbricated and arranged in diagonal series; scale rows around the body 20/20/18. Mid-dorsal scales 215. Ventral scales 211. Cloacal plate rounded, bordered anteriorly by three rows of scales and posteriorly by five rows of scales. Subcaudal scales 11, excluding the terminal spine. Skull osteology ( N = 1; MNRJ 18743): The length of the skull is 6.52 mm, the width is 2.96 mm. The snout region has a globular enlarged-shape and highly consolidated. The snout articulates with the braincase by the nasal and prefrontal sutures and with the frontal bone. The anteroventral region of the premaxilla has a short backward process. The midsagittal lamina separates both sides of the premaxilla (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla is confluent with the mid-dorsal laminae of the nasals and with the mid-dorsal ridges of the vomeronasal cupola of the septomaxillae (Fig. 5). The nasal process of premaxilla contacts the vertical laminae of the nasals in the anterodorsal and posteroventral portions, with the central portion not in contact, leaving a large round canal between the olfactory chambers (Fig. 5A). The medial side of the maxilla has a shallow depression (or fossa), where lodges the maxillary process of the palatine. The palatine fossa is on the lateral side of the maxilla, in the region of the articular fossa. The palatine fossa is large (Fig. 6A), with a diameter of 0.27 mm. The medial border of the maxilla is concaveshaped (Fig. 6C). The ventral pterygoid process of the palatine is straight-shaped and ventrally directed (Fig. 7A). The retroarticular process projects in parallel to the horizontal plane of the articular. The angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone is close to 90° (Fig. 8A). The edentulous dentary is restricted to the distal end of the mandible, articulating mainly with the splenial. The dorsal side of the dentary is flat and pierced by two foramina (Fig. 9A). H e m i p e n i a l m o r p h o l o g y ( N = 4; o r g a n s f u l l y eƲerted and inflated): Hemipenis single, with a long cylindrical body and conical in the distal region (apical cup) (Fig. 13A–D); a tissue sheet extends from the lateral surface of the apical cup, it folds and runs transversely forming a curved papilla (Fig. 13A); the region between this flounce and the lateral sheet is deeper, forming a pocket on the sulcate side (Fig. 13A); internal surfaces of the flounce and the conical termination covered with smooth and shallow striations (Fig. 13A, B); sulcus spermaticus single, protruding over the surface of the hemipenial body, originating on the medial surface of the basal region of the hemipenis and running distally sinuously, reaching the flounce and draining to the pocket of the sulcate side (Fig. 13C); proximal region of the asulcate side of the hemipenial body with a transversal groove (Fig. 13D); medial region of the sulcate and asulcate sides (including the sulcus walls) covered with smooth and shallow striations (Fig. 13C, D). Coloration of the holotype in preserƲatiƲe: Dorsum (13/11/13 rows scales) pale brown. In the dorsal part of the body up to the tail, a fine darker brown reticulum, particularly concentrated in the central part of dorsal scales (Supporting Information, Fig. S5A). Venter (7/9/5 rows scales) pale cream (Supporting Information, Fig. S5B). Dorsal portions of snout pale cream, with a few light brown spots, covering partially both rostral and nasal scales (Fig. 12A, B). The ventral portion of snout pale cream and immaculate (Fig. 12C). Symphysial region pale cream and immaculate (Fig. 12C). Dorsal head scales (supraoculars, frontal, postfrontal, parietals and occipitals) and dorsal portions of lateral head scales (ocular, nasal and lower nasal) predominantly pale cream with few pale brown spots (Fig. 12A, B) and ventral portions pale cream (Fig. 12C). Cloacal plate pale cream and terminal spine creamy pale brown (Supporting Information, Fig. S5B). Variation of paratypes: Number of subcaudal scales ten to 12 (mean = 11, SD = 1, N = 3). Tail length 2.95– 3.20% of TTL (N = 3). Largest male with 170 mm TTL. MBD 4.09–5.13 mm (mean = 4.61, SD = 0.52, N = 3); number of mid-dorsal scales 208–217 (mean = 212.3, SD = 4.50, N = 3); number of ventral scales 195–208 (mean = 201.0, SD = 6.55, N = 3); and number of scale rows around the body 20/20/18 (N = 2) or 20/20/20 (N = 1). The colour patterns of the paratypes are similar to that found in the holotype (Supporting Information, Fig. S6A–F). Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the Latin name ‘ Mars ’, in allusion to the Mars symbol, used to represent the male gender. The choice of the name is a reference to the distinct hemipenial morphology of this species that differs from all other species of Amerotyphlops. Distribution and habitat: Amerotyphlops martis is only known from Praia das Neves, situated at 20 km from the municipality of Presidente Kennedy, state of Espírito Santo, Brazil (Fig. 10B). This region is considered as part of the Atlantic Forest morphoclimatic domain, in the Atlantic Coast Restingas ecoregion, a sandy plain located along to the coast of Brazil (Olson et al., 2001). The prevalent phytophysiognomy in Praia das Neves is heterogeneous, presenting an herbaceous, shrubs and arboreous forest usually distributed in parallels ridges to the shoreline (Braz et al., 2013), with an annual average of temperature and rainfall of 20 °C and 1561 mm, respectively (Peel et al., 2007). Praia das Neves has several different levels of successional vegetation, with areas close to the beach line presenting herbaceous and shrubby vegetation, with stretches of graminoid beach communities, changing the vegetation in the interior, where presenting a fragmented Ridge forest, with medium height trees (between 15 and 20 m), with lianas, epiphytes and herbaceous understory (Braz et al., 2013)., Published as part of Graboski, Roberta, Arredondo, Juan C., Grazziotin, Felipe G., Guerra-Fuentes, Ricardo Arturo, Da Silva, Ariane A. A., Prudente, Ana L. C., Pinto, Roberta R., Rodrigues, Miguel T., Bonatto, Sandro L. & Zaher, Hussam, 2023, Revealing the cryptic diversity of the widespread and poorly known South American blind snake genus Amerotyphlops (Typhlopidae: Scolecophidia) through integrative taxonomy, pp. 719-751 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 197 on pages 735-738, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac059, http://zenodo.org/record/7695978, {"references":["Reis JRM, Fontoura T. 2009. Diversidade de bromelias epifitas na Reserva Particular do Patrimonio Natural Serra do Teimoso - Jussari, BA. Biota Neotropica 9: 73 - 79. Doi: 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032009000100009.","Silveira LF, Develey PF, Pacheco JF, Whitney BM. 2005. Avifauna of the Serra das Lontras - Javi montane complex, Bahia, Brazil. Cotinga 24: 45 - 54.","Amorim AM, Matos FB. 2009. A vegetacao do complexo de Serra das Lontras. In: SAVE Brasil, IESB, BirdLife, eds. Complexo de Serras das Lontras e Una, Bahia: elementos naturais e aspectos de sua conserVacao. Sao Paulo: SAVE Brasil, 16 - 25.","Nacif PGS, Costa OV, Araujo M, Santos PS. 2009. Geomorfodinamica da Regiao do Complexo de Serras das Lontras. In: SAVE Brasil, IESB, BirdLife, eds. Complexo de Serras das Lontras e Una, Bahia: Elementos naturais e aspectos de sua conserVacao. Sao Paulo: SAVE Brasil, 9 - 14.","Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D'amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. BioScience 51: 933 - 938. Doi: 10.1641 / 0006 - 3568 (2001) 051 [0933: TEOTWA] 2.0. CO; 2.","Braz DM, Jacques EL, Somner GV, Sylvestre LS, Rosa MMT, Pereira-Moura MVL, Germano Filho P, Couto AVS, Amorim TA. 2013. Restinga de Praia das Neves, ES, Brasil: caracterizacao fitofisionomica, floristica e conservacao. Biota Neotropica 13: 315 - 331. Doi: 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032013000300032.","Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. 2007. Updated world map of the Koppen - Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11: 1633 - 1644. Doi: 10.5194 / hess- 11 - 1633 - 2007."]}

AMEROTYPHLOPS CAETANOI SP. NOV. (FIG. 4; SUPPORTING INFORMATION, FIG. S3) Z o o b a n k r e g i s t r a t i o n: L S I D u r n:l s i d:z o o b a n k. org:act: BA5C7CBF-7391-4797-8CEC-DF201B294A73 Holotype: An adult female, MZUSP S-023380, (field number MTR 19921), collected by Ana C. Q. Carnaval, José C. Silva, Marco A. Sena, Mauro Teixeira Jr., Miguel T. Rodrigues, Renata C. Amaro and Renato Recoder on 15 December 2010 from Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina, on BR 144 Road, municipality Lençóis (12° 32 ′ 44.682 ′′ S, 41° 21 ′ 50.364 ′′ W; c. 493 m a.s.l.), state of Bahia, Brazil (Fig. 4; Supporting Information, Fig. S3). Diagnosis: This species is distinguished from all other congeneric species by the unique combination of the following of characters: (1) nasal suture incomplete; (2) rostral scale oval; (3) supralabial scales four; (4) infralabial scales three; (5) rows scales around the body 18/18/18; (6) mid-dorsal scales 212; (7) ventral scales 202; (8) rows of dorsal scales dark brown 13; (9) rows of ventral scales yellowish cream and immaculate 5; (10) caudal spine dark brown; (11) subcaudal scales 9; (12) TTL 176 mm; (13) TL 4.33 mm; (14) broad contact between the lamina of the premaxilla and the vertical laminae of the nasals, forming a continuous bony septum separating the olfactory chambers; (15) large palatine fossa on the lateral side of the maxilla; (16) maxilla with a straight medial border; (17) ventral pterygoid process of palatine straight; (18) ratio between length of ventral pterygoid process of palatine and skull length 0.25; (19) angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone close to 90°; and (20) dorsal surface of dentary bone with two evident foramina. The new species differs from Amerotyphlops costaricensis, A. lehneri, A. microstomus, A. stadelmani, A. tasymicris, A. tenuis, A. trinitatus and A. tycherus, by having an incomplete nasal suture (vs. complete nasal suture); from A. brongersmianus, A. reticulatus and A. minuisquamus by having 18/18/18 rows scales around the body (vs. 18/16/14, 18/18/14, 20/18/14 or 20/18/ 15 in A. minuisquamus; 20/20/18 or 20/20/ 20 in A. brongersmianus and A. reticulatus); from A. brongersmianus by having an angle close to 90° between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone (vs. an angle of 135°); from A. yonenagae by having less than 250 mid-dorsal scales (vs. more than 250 mid-dorsal); from A. amoipira by having highly pigmented cephalic scales with a dark brown dorsum (vs. few pigmented cephalic scales, creamy brown dorsum with a fine darker brown paravertebral line concentrated in the anterior part of the body); from A. paucisquamus by having a largest number of mid-dorsal, 212 (vs. fewer number of mid-dorsal, between 162 and 209); and from A. arenensis by having a smaller rostral width (RW1) at dorsal portion, 1.29 mm (vs. larger rostral width at dorsal portion (RW1), between 1.44 and 2.13 mm). Table 1 shows additional morphometric characters and scale patterns found in A. caetanoi and morphologically similar species distributed in southern and north-eastern Brazil. Description of the holotype: Adult female, TTL 176 mm, TL 4.33 mm, MBD/(SVL-HR) 0.036 mm, and TL/SVL 39.72 mm. Head slightly depressed dorsoventrally, not wider than ‘neck’. Snout round in dorsal and ventral views. Rostral oval, longer than wide, narrow at anteroposterior region and wider at medial region; visible in dorsal view, extending ventrodorsally without reaching the imaginary transverse line between anterior borders of eyes. Rostral contacting nasal (anterior and posterior) dorsolaterally, and first supralabial and anterior nasal scales ventrally. Nasal suture incomplete, only partially dividing the anterior and posterior portions of nasal scale. Suture begins in the upper edge of second supralabial, passes through nostril, but fails to reach rostral. Anterior nasal in contact with first infralabial and upper edge of second infralabial. Posterior nasal longer than wide, contacting upper margin of second supralabial and preocular. Supralabials four, fourth twice longer than third. Infralabials three, third largest. Eye diameter 0.56 mm; eyes not visible in ventral view, located dorsolaterally, close to suture between preocular and ocular scales, completely covered by ocular scale. Ocular scales contacting frontal. Body cylindrical and robust. Midbody diameter 6.21 mm. Dorsal and ventral scales cycloid, wider than long, highly imbricated and arranged in diagonal series; scale rows around the body 18/18/18. Mid-dorsal scales 212. Ventral scales 202. Cloacal plate rounded, bordered anteriorly by four rows of scales and posteriorly by five rows of scales. Subcaudal scales nine, excluding the terminal spine. Terminal spine large, stout base and dark brown. Abbreviations: ED, eye diameter; HR, head radius; HWE, head width; IN, internasal distance; INORB, interorbital distance; RL, rostral length; RW1, rostral width; MBD, midbody diameter. Skull osteology ( N = 1; MZUSP S-023380): The length of the skull is 6.15 mm, the width is 2.92 mm. The snout region has a globular enlarged-shape and highly consolidated. The snout articulates with the braincase by the nasal and prefrontal sutures and with the frontal bone. The anteroventral region of the premaxilla has a short backward process. The midsagittal lamina separates both sides of the premaxilla (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla is confluent with the mid-dorsal laminae of the nasals and with the mid-dorsal ridges of the vomeronasal cupola of the septomaxillae (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla and the nasal laminae are in contact, forming a continuous bony septum separating the olfactory chambers (Fig. 5B). The medial side of the maxilla has a shallow depression (or fossa), where lodges the maxillary process of the palatine. The palatine fossa is on the lateral side of the maxilla, in the region of the articular fossa. The palatine fossa is large with a diameter of 0.25 mm long (Fig. 6A). The medial border of the maxilla is straight (Fig. 6A). The ventral pterygoid process of the palatine is straight and ventrally directed (Fig. 7A). The retroarticular process projects in parallel to the horizontal plane of the articular. The angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone is close to 90° (Fig. 8A). The edentulous dentary is restricted to the distal end of the mandible, articulating mainly with the splenial. The dorsal side of the dentary is flat and pierced by two foramina (Fig. 9A). Coloration of the holotype in preserƲatiƲe: Dorsum (13/13/13 row scales) dark brown (Supporting Information, Fig. S3A), venter (5/5/5 rows scales) yellowish cream (Supporting Information, Fig. S3B). Dorsal portions of snout yellowish cream, with a dark brown spot, covering both rostral and nasal scales (two-thirds of snout) (Fig. 4A, B). Ventral portions of snout yellowish cream and few pigmented (Fig. 4C). Symphysial region yellowish cream and immaculate (Fig. 4C). Dorsal head scales (supraoculars, frontal, postfrontal, parietals and occipitals) dark brown. Dorsal portions of lateral head scales (ocular, nasal and lower nasal) and ventral portions yellowish cream with dark brown spots. Cloacal plate pale yellowish cream and terminal spine dark brown (Fig. 4A–C). Etymology: The name is a homage to Brazilian composer, singer and political activist Caetano Emanuel Viana Telles Veloso, better known as Caetano Veloso. Caetano is one of the most famous Brazilians born in the state of Bahia (in 1942), the same state in which the new species occurs. He became known for his participation in the Brazilian musical movement ‘ Tropicalismo ’ that encompassed theatre, poetry and music in the 1960s, at the beginning of the Brazilian military dictatorship. Veloso is also a well-known conservationist, acting to give voice to the preservation of the Brazilian natural environments and to indigenous resilience. Distribution and habitat: Amerotyphlops caetanoi is known only from Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina, in the BR 144 Road, situated at 2 km from the municipality of Lençóis, state of Bahia, Brazil (Fig. 10B). This region is one of the largest upland Atlantic dry forest enclaves of the east-central Bahia state (Veloso et al., 1991). The phytophysiognomy corresponds to a submontane seasonal semi-deciduous forest (Couto et al., 2011; Braz et al., 2013), ranging from 400 to 600 m a.s.l., with an annual average of temperature and rainfall of 20 °C and 100 mm, respectively (Funch et al., 2009). This area presents a non-continuous canopy, consisting of tall trees (approximately 10–16 m), and a subcanopy, consisting of medium-height trees (approximately 6–9 m), with a well-established and preserved understory (Couto et al., 2011).

AMEROTYPHLOPS MONTANUM SP. NOV. (FIG. 11; SUPPORTING INFORMATION, FIG. S4) Z o o b a n k r e g i s t r a t i o n: u r n: l s i d: z o o b a n k. org:act: BDB85DE5-C88C-4894-9197-60C3200FEC73 Holotype: An adult female, MZUSP 20065, (field number MTR 16379), collected by Augustín Camacho, José Cassimiro, Mauro Teixeira Jr., Miguel T. Rodrigues, Renata C. Amaro and Renato Recoder 6 March 2009 from Parque Nacional Serra das Lontras (15° 11 ′ 46.32 ′′ S, 39° 20 ′ 54.24 ′′ W; c. 234 m a.s.l.), municipality of Arataca, state of Bahia, Brazil (Fig. 11; Supporting Information, Fig. S4). Diagnosis: This species is distinguished from all other South American congeneric species by a unique combination of the following of characters: (1) nasal suture incomplete; (2) rostral scale oval; (3) supralabial scales four; (4) infralabial scales three; (5) rows scales around the body 20/20/18; (6) mid-dorsal scales 220; (7) ventral scales 217; (8) rows of dorsal scales dark brown 11; (9) rows of ventral scales yellowish cream and immaculate 7–9; (10) caudal spine dark brown; (11) subcaudal scales 11; (12) TTL 216 mm; (13) TL 5.32 mm; (14) contact between the nasal process of premaxilla and vertical laminae of the nasals restricted to the anterodorsal portion, with the central and posteroventral portions not in contact, leaving a large canal between the olfactory chambers; (15) smallsized palatine fossa on the lateral side of the maxilla; (16) maxilla with a straight medial border; (17) ventral pterygoid process of palatine straight; (18) ratio between length of ventral pterygoid process of palatine and skull length 0.06; (19) angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone close to 90°; and (20) dorsal surface of dentary bone without evident foramina. Amerotyphlops montanum differs from A. costaricensis, A. lehneri, A. microstomus, A. stadelmani, A. tasymicris, A. tenuis, A. trinitatus and A. tycherus by having an incomplete nasal suture (vs. complete nasal suture); from A. arenensis, A. caetanoi, A. amoipira, A. minuisquamus, A. paucisquamus and A. yonenagae by having20/20/18rowsscalesaroundthebody (vs.18/16/14, 18/18/14, 20/18/14 or 20/18/ 15 in A. minuisquamus and 18/18/ 18 in A. arenensis, A. caetanoi, A. amoipira, A. paucisquamus and A. yonenagae); from A. reticulatus by having highly pigmented cephalic scales with a dark brown dorsum and dorsum tail brown (vs. yellow and few pigmented cephalic scales, dorsum brown or black and dorsum tail black with cream or yellow spot); and from A. brongermianus by having a larger interorbital relative width (INORB/HWE) 0.725 mm (vs. smaller interorbital relative width, between 0.526 –0.705 mm). Table 1 shows additional morphometric characters and scale patterns found in A. montanum and in a morphologically similar species distributed in southeastern Brazil (A. brongermianus). Description of the holotype: Adult female, TTL 216 mm, TL 5.32 mm, MBD/(SVL-HR) 0.034 mm and TL/SVL 39.60 mm. Head slightly depressed dorsoventrally, not wider than ‘neck’. Snout round in dorsal and ventral views. Rostral oval, longer than wide, narrow at anteroposterior region and wider at medial region; visible in dorsal view, extending ventrodorsally without reaching the imaginary transverse line between anterior borders of eyes. Rostral contacting nasal (anterior and posterior) dorsolaterally, and first supralabial and anterior nasal scales ventrally. Nasal suture incomplete, only partially dividing the anterior and posterior portions of nasal scale. Suture begins in the upper edge of second supralabial, passes through nostril, but fails to reach rostral. Anterior nasal in contact with first infralabial and upper edge of second infralabial. Posterior nasal longer than wide, contacting upper margin of second supralabial and preocular. Supralabials four, fourth twice longer than third. Infralabials three, third largest. Eye diameter 1.03 mm; eyes not visible in ventral view, located dorsolaterally, close to suture between preocular and ocular scales, completely covered by ocular scale. Ocular scales contacting frontal. Body cylindrical and robust. Midbody diameter 7.12 mm. Dorsal and ventral scales cycloid, wider than long, highly imbricated and arranged in diagonal series; scale rows around the body 20/20/18. Mid-dorsal scales 220. Ventral scales 217. Cloacal plate rounded, bordered anteriorly by four rows of scales and posteriorly by five rows of scales. Subcaudal scales 11, excluding the terminal spine. Terminal spine large, stout base and dark brown. Skull osteology ( N = 1; MZUSP 20065): The length of the skull is 8.08 mm and the width is 4.14 mm. The snout region has a globular enlarged-shape and highly consolidated. The snout articulates with the braincase by the nasal and prefrontal sutures and with the frontal bone. The anteroventral region of the premaxilla has a short backward process.The midsagittal lamina separates both sides of the premaxilla (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla is confluent with the mid-dorsal laminae of the nasals and with the mid-dorsal ridges of the vomeronasal cupola of the septomaxillae (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla and the nasal laminae are restricted to the anterodorsal portion, with the central and posteroventral portions not in contact, leaving a large canal between the olfactory chambers (Fig. 5A). The medial side of the maxilla has a shallow depression (or fossa), where lodges the maxillary process of the palatine. The palatine fossa is on the lateral side of the maxilla, in the region of the articular fossa. The palatine fossa is small, with a diameter of 0.17 mm long (Fig. 5B). The medial border of the maxilla is straight (Fig. 6B). The ventral pterygoid process of the palatine is straight-shaped and ventrally directed (Fig. 7A). The retroarticular process projects in parallel to the horizontal plane of the articular. The angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone is close to 90° (Fig. 8A). The edentulous dentary is restricted to the distal end of the mandible, articulating mainly with the splenial. The dorsal side of the dentary is flat and without evident foramina (Fig. 9B). Coloration of the holotype in preserƲatiƲe: Dorsum (11/11/11 rows scales) dark brown, venter (9/9/7 rows scales) yellowish cream (Supporting Information, Fig. S4A, B). Dorsal portions of snout yellowish cream, with a dark brown spot, covering totally both rostral and nasal scales (Fig. 11A, B). Ventral portion of snout yellowish cream and few pigmented (Fig. 11C). Symphysial region yellowish cream and immaculate (Fig. 11C). Dorsal head scales (supraoculars, frontal, postfrontal, parietals and occipitals) and dorsal portions of lateral head scales (ocular, nasal and lower nasal) predominantly dark brown (Fig. 11A, B). Ventral portion of head scales (nasal and lower nasal) yellowish cream (Fig. 11A, C). Cloacal plate pale yellowish cream and terminal spine dark brown (Supporting Information, Fig. S4B). Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the neutral form of Latin adjective ‘ montanus ’. It is a reference to the type locality, a high elevational forest, located on the slopes of a hill summit in the Brazilian state of Bahia. Distribution and habitat: Amerotyphlops montanum is known from the Parque Nacional Serra das Lontras, situated at 10 km from the municipality of Arataca, in state of Bahia, Brazil, and from Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Serra do Teimoso, situated at 5 km from the municipality of Jussari, in state of Bahia, Brazil (Fig. 10B). These regions are known as part of the Serra das Lontras montane complex (Nacif et al., 2009), belonging to the Atlantic Forest morphoclimatic domain, in the Bahia Coastal forest ecoregion (Olson et al., 2001). The prevalent phytophysiognomy correspond to ombrophilous dense and semi-deciduous forests (Veloso et al., 1991;Amorim & epiphytes, with a well-established and preserved understory. The forest changes dramatically above 800 m, presenting stunted trees (10–15 m tall), covered with small bromeliads, heavy bryophyte and lichen growth (Veloso et al., 1991; Amorim & Matos, 2009; Reis & Fontoura, 2009). Additional data on the habitat of Serra das Lontras and Serra do Teimoso are, respectively, in Recoder et al. (2010) and Rodrigues et al. (2002). Remarks: In our phylogenetic analysis we included a sample from a specimen from the Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Serra do Teimoso, from the municipality of Jussari, in the state of Bahia, Brazil. Unfortunately, we did not have access to review this specimen, but we have recognized its molecular relationships with A. montanum. The tissue sample is currently stored in the genetic resource collection of Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo University (see Supporting Information, Table S2).

AMEROTYPHLOPS ILLUSORIUM SP. NOV. (FIG. 14; SUPPORTING INFORMATION, FIGS S7, S 8) Z o o b a n k r e g i s t r a t i o n: u r n: l s i d: z o o b a n k. org:act: AF7FA356-4412-4C70-AA6D-8C4D24D81966 Holotype: An adult female, MZUSP 18787, (field number MTR 13542), collected by Miguel T. Rodrigues and collaborators on 26 March 2007 from Fazenda Nova Alegria (16° 31 ′ 50.7 ′′ S, 39° 07 ′ 06.7 ′′ W, c. 30 m a.s.l.), municipality of Trancoso, state of Bahia, Brazil (Fig. 14; Supporting Information, Fig. S7). Paratypes: Two male specimens, MNRJ 19614 and MNRJ 19613, collected by Tiago S. Soares between 6 and 15 June 2010 from Praia de Porto Seguro, municipality of Trancoso, state of Bahia, Brazil (Supporting Information, Fig. S8A–D). Diagnosis: This species is distinguished from all other South American congeneric species by the unique combination of the following of characters: (1) nasal suture incomplete; (2) rostral scale oval; (3) supralabial scales four; (4) infralabial scales three; (5) rows scales around the body 20/20/18; (6) mid-dorsal scales 221–230; (7) ventral scales 210–219; (8) rows of dorsal scales dark brown 13–15; (9) rows of ventral scales yellowish cream and immaculate five to seven; (10) caudal spine dark brown; (11) subcaudal scales ten to 12; (12) maximum TTL 229 mm; (13) maximum TL 6 mm; (14) nasal process of premaxilla contacting the vertical laminae of the nasals in the anterodorsal and posteroventral portions, with the central portion not in contact, leaving a large round canal between the olfactory chambers; (15) large palatine fossa on the lateral side of the maxilla; (16) maxilla with a straight medial border; (17) ventral pterygoid process of palatine straight; (18) ratio between length of ventral pterygoid process of palatine and skull length 0.06; (19) angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone close to 90°; and (20) dorsal surface of dentary bone with one to two evident foramina. Amerotyphlops illusorium differs from A. costaricensis, A. lehneri, A. microstomus, A. stadelmani, A. tasymicris, A. tenuis, A. trinitatus and A. tycherus by having an incomplete nasal suture (vs. complete nasal suture); from A. arenensis, A. caetanoi, A. amoipira, A. minuisquamus, A. paucisquamus and A. yonenagae by having 20/20/18 rows scales around the body (vs. 18/16/14, 18/18/14, 20/18/14 or 20/18/ 15 in A. minuisquamus and 18/18/ 18 in A. arenensis, A. caetanoi, A. amoipira, A. paucisquamus and A. yonenagae); from A. reticulatus by having highly pigmented cephalic scales with a dark brown dorsum and dorsum tail brown (vs. yellow and few pigmented cephalic scales, dorsum brown or black and dorsum tail black with cream or yellow spot); from A. montanum by having a smaller rostral width (RW1) at the dorsal portion, between 1.22 and 1.54 mm (vs. a larger rostral width at the dorsal portion 1.88 mm); from A. martis by having a largest number of mid-dorsal scales, between 221 and 230 (vs. fewer number of mid-dorsal scales, between 208 and 217); and from A. brongermianus by having the ventral portion of the pterygoid process of palatine straight (vs. ventral pterygoid process of palatine curved). Table 1 shows additional morphometric characters and scale patterns found in A. illusorium and morphologically similar species distributed in southern and north-eastern Brazil. Description of the holotype: Adult female, TTL 229 mm, TL 6 mm, MBD/(SVL-HR) 0.037 mm and TL/SVL 37.16 mm. Head slightly depressed dorsoventrally, not wider than ‘neck’. Snout round in dorsal and ventral views. Rostral oval, longer than wide, narrow at anteroposterior region and wider at medial region; visible in dorsal view, extending ventrodorsally without reaching the imaginary transverse line between anterior borders of eyes. Rostral contacting nasal (anterior and posterior) dorsolaterally and first supralabial and anterior nasal scales ventrally. Nasal suture incomplete, only partially dividing the anterior and posterior portions of nasal scale. Suture begins in the upper edge of second supralabial, passes through nostril, but fails to reach rostral. Anterior nasal in contact with first infralabial and upper edge of second infralabial. Posterior nasal longer than wide, contacting upper margin of second supralabial and preocular. Supralabials four, fourth twice longer than third. Infralabials three, third largest. Eye diameter 0.77 mm; eyes not visible in ventral view, located dorsolaterally, close to suture between preocular and ocular scales, completely covered by ocular scale. Ocular scales contacting frontal. Body cylindrical and robust. Midbody diameter 8.28 mm. Dorsal and ventral scales cycloid, wider than long, highly imbricated and arranged in diagonal series; scale rows around the body 20/20/18. Mid-dorsal scales 221. Ventral scales 218. Cloacal plate rounded, bordered anteriorly by three rows of scales and posteriorly by five rows of scales. Subcaudal scales ten, excluding the terminal spine. Terminal spine large, stout base and dark brown. Skull osteology ( N = 2; MZUSP 18787 and MNRJ 19613): Length of the skull 7.03–8.22 mm, and skull width 3.46–3.99 mm. The snout region has a globular enlarged-shape and highly consolidated. The snout articulates with the braincase by the nasal and prefrontal sutures and with the frontal bone. The anteroventral region of the premaxilla has a short backward process. The midsagittal lamina separates both sides of the premaxilla (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla is confluent with the mid-dorsal laminae of the nasals and with the mid-dorsal ridges of the vomeronasal cupola of the septomaxillae (Fig. 5). The nasal process of premaxilla contacting the vertical laminae of the nasals in the anterodorsal and posteroventral portions, with the central portion not in contact, leaving a large round canal between the olfactory chambers (Fig. 5A). The medial side of the maxilla has a shallow depression (or fossa), where lodges the maxillary process of the palatine. The palatine fossa is on the lateral side of the maxilla, in the region of the articular fossa. The palatine fossa is large (Fig. 6A), with diameters between 0.24 and 0.29 mm long. The medial border of the maxilla is straight-shaped (Fig. 6A). The pterygoid process of the palatine is straight-shaped and ventrally directed (Fig. 7A). The retroarticular process projects in parallel to the horizontal plane of the articular. The angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone is close to 90° (Fig. 8A). The edentulous dentary is restricted to the distal end of the mandible, articulating mainly with the splenial. The dorsal side of the dentary is flat and pierced by one or two foramina (Fig. 9A). Coloration of the holotype in preserƲatiƲe: Dorsum (13/13/13 rows scales) dark brown, venter (7/7/5 rows scales) yellowish cream (Fig. S7A, B). Dorsal portions of snout yellowish cream, with a dark brown spot, covering both rostral and nasal scales (Fig. 14A, B). Ventral portion of snout yellowish cream and immaculate (Fig. 14C). Symphysial region yellowish cream and immaculate (Fig. 14C). Dorsal head scales (supraoculars, frontal, postfrontal, parietals and occipitals) and dorsal portions of lateral head scales (ocular, nasal, and lower nasal) predominantly dark brown (Fig. 14A, B) and ventral portions yellowish cream (Fig. 14C). Cloacal plate pale yellowish cream and terminal spine dark brown (Fig. S7B). Variation of paratypes: Number of subcaudal scales 11–12 (mean = 11.5, SD = 0.7, N = 2). Tail length 2.58– 3.0 % of TTL (N = 2). Largest male with 207 mm TTL. MBD 4.91–5.11 mm (mean = 5.01, SD = 0.13, N = 2); number of mid-dorsal scales 226–230 (mean = 228.0, SD = 2.82, N = 2); number of ventral scales 210–219 (mean = 214.0, SD = 6.36, N = 2); and number of scale rows around the body 20/20/18. The colour patterns of the paratypes are similar to that found in the holotype (Supporting Information, Fig. S8A–D). Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the Latin adjective illusorius, illusory or ironic, in reference to the external morphology that challenges its identification when compared to Amerotyphlops brongersmianus. Distribution and habitat: Amerotyphlops illusorium is known from Fazenda Nova Alegria, situated at 6 km from the municipality of Trancoso, in the state of Bahia, Brazil (Fig. 10B). This region is considered as part of the Atlantic Forest morphoclimatic domain, in the Bahia Coastal forest ecoregion, along the northeastern coast of Brazil (Olson et al., 2001) The prevalent phytophysiognomy in Trancoso presenting a restinga and ombrophilous dense lowland forests (Veloso et al., 1991; Rizzini, 1997; Assis et al., 2011), with an elevational gradient ranging from sea level to 50 m a.s.l., with an annual average of temperature of 24.4 °C and rainfall between 1300 and 1600 mm, respectively (Veloso et al., 1991; Rizzini, 1997; Assis et al., 2011; Santos, 2013). This region has several different levels of successional vegetation, with areas close to the sandplain with herbaceous, shrubs and arboreous forest and areas at the beginning of piedmont, with lowland forests, with medium height trees (approximately 20 m), with epiphytes and herbaceous understory (Santos, 2013)., Published as part of Graboski, Roberta, Arredondo, Juan C., Grazziotin, Felipe G., Guerra-Fuentes, Ricardo Arturo, Da Silva, Ariane A. A., Prudente, Ana L. C., Pinto, Roberta R., Rodrigues, Miguel T., Bonatto, Sandro L. & Zaher, Hussam, 2023, Revealing the cryptic diversity of the widespread and poorly known South American blind snake genus Amerotyphlops (Typhlopidae: Scolecophidia) through integrative taxonomy, pp. 719-751 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 197 on pages 738-740, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac059, http://zenodo.org/record/7695978, {"references":["Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D'amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. BioScience 51: 933 - 938. Doi: 10.1641 / 0006 - 3568 (2001) 051 [0933: TEOTWA] 2.0. CO; 2.","Veloso HP, Rangel Filho ALR, Lima JCA. 1991. Classificacao da Vegetacao brasileira, adaptada a um sistema uniVersal. Rio de Janeiro: Ministerio da Economia, Fazenda e Planejamento, Fundacao Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, Diretoria de Geociencias, Departamento de Recursos Naturais e Estudos Ambientais.","Rizzini CT. 1997. Tratado de fitogeografia do Brasil: aspectos ecologicos, sociologicos e floristicos. Rio de Janeiro: Ambito Cultural.","Assis MA, Prata EMB, Pedroni F, Sanchez M, Eisenlohr PV, Martins FR, Santos FAM, Tamashiro JY, Alves LF, Vieira SA, Piccolo MC, Martins SC, Camargo PB, Carmo JB, Simoes E, Martinelli LA, Joly CA. 2011. Florestas de restinga e de terras baixas na planicie costeira do sudeste do Brasil: vegetacao e heterogeneidade ambiental. Biota Neotropica 11: 103 - 121. Doi: 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032011000200012.","Santos VDJ. 2013. Restingas do estado da Bahia: riqueza, diVersidade e estrutura. Unpublished DPhil, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco."]}

AMEROTYPHLOPS CAETANOI SP. NOV. (FIG. 4; SUPPORTING INFORMATION, FIG. S3) Z o o b a n k r e g i s t r a t i o n: L S I D u r n:l s i d:z o o b a n k. org:act: BA5C7CBF-7391-4797-8CEC-DF201B294A73 Holotype: An adult female, MZUSP S-023380, (field number MTR 19921), collected by Ana C. Q. Carnaval, José C. Silva, Marco A. Sena, Mauro Teixeira Jr., Miguel T. Rodrigues, Renata C. Amaro and Renato Recoder on 15 December 2010 from Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina, on BR 144 Road, municipality Lençóis (12° 32 ′ 44.682 ′′ S, 41° 21 ′ 50.364 ′′ W; c. 493 m a.s.l.), state of Bahia, Brazil (Fig. 4; Supporting Information, Fig. S3). Diagnosis: This species is distinguished from all other congeneric species by the unique combination of the following of characters: (1) nasal suture incomplete; (2) rostral scale oval; (3) supralabial scales four; (4) infralabial scales three; (5) rows scales around the body 18/18/18; (6) mid-dorsal scales 212; (7) ventral scales 202; (8) rows of dorsal scales dark brown 13; (9) rows of ventral scales yellowish cream and immaculate 5; (10) caudal spine dark brown; (11) subcaudal scales 9; (12) TTL 176 mm; (13) TL 4.33 mm; (14) broad contact between the lamina of the premaxilla and the vertical laminae of the nasals, forming a continuous bony septum separating the olfactory chambers; (15) large palatine fossa on the lateral side of the maxilla; (16) maxilla with a straight medial border; (17) ventral pterygoid process of palatine straight; (18) ratio between length of ventral pterygoid process of palatine and skull length 0.25; (19) angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone close to 90°; and (20) dorsal surface of dentary bone with two evident foramina. The new species differs from Amerotyphlops costaricensis, A. lehneri, A. microstomus, A. stadelmani, A. tasymicris, A. tenuis, A. trinitatus and A. tycherus, by having an incomplete nasal suture (vs. complete nasal suture); from A. brongersmianus, A. reticulatus and A. minuisquamus by having 18/18/18 rows scales around the body (vs. 18/16/14, 18/18/14, 20/18/14 or 20/18/ 15 in A. minuisquamus; 20/20/18 or 20/20/ 20 in A. brongersmianus and A. reticulatus); from A. brongersmianus by having an angle close to 90° between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone (vs. an angle of 135°); from A. yonenagae by having less than 250 mid-dorsal scales (vs. more than 250 mid-dorsal); from A. amoipira by having highly pigmented cephalic scales with a dark brown dorsum (vs. few pigmented cephalic scales, creamy brown dorsum with a fine darker brown paravertebral line concentrated in the anterior part of the body); from A. paucisquamus by having a largest number of mid-dorsal, 212 (vs. fewer number of mid-dorsal, between 162 and 209); and from A. arenensis by having a smaller rostral width (RW1) at dorsal portion, 1.29 mm (vs. larger rostral width at dorsal portion (RW1), between 1.44 and 2.13 mm). Table 1 shows additional morphometric characters and scale patterns found in A. caetanoi and morphologically similar species distributed in southern and north-eastern Brazil. Description of the holotype: Adult female, TTL 176 mm, TL 4.33 mm, MBD/(SVL-HR) 0.036 mm, and TL/SVL 39.72 mm. Head slightly depressed dorsoventrally, not wider than ‘neck’. Snout round in dorsal and ventral views. Rostral oval, longer than wide, narrow at anteroposterior region and wider at medial region; visible in dorsal view, extending ventrodorsally without reaching the imaginary transverse line between anterior borders of eyes. Rostral contacting nasal (anterior and posterior) dorsolaterally, and first supralabial and anterior nasal scales ventrally. Nasal suture incomplete, only partially dividing the anterior and posterior portions of nasal scale. Suture begins in the upper edge of second supralabial, passes through nostril, but fails to reach rostral. Anterior nasal in contact with first infralabial and upper edge of second infralabial. Posterior nasal longer than wide, contacting upper margin of second supralabial and preocular. Supralabials four, fourth twice longer than third. Infralabials three, third largest. Eye diameter 0.56 mm; eyes not visible in ventral view, located dorsolaterally, close to suture between preocular and ocular scales, completely covered by ocular scale. Ocular scales contacting frontal. Body cylindrical and robust. Midbody diameter 6.21 mm. Dorsal and ventral scales cycloid, wider than long, highly imbricated and arranged in diagonal series; scale rows around the body 18/18/18. Mid-dorsal scales 212. Ventral scales 202. Cloacal plate rounded, bordered anteriorly by four rows of scales and posteriorly by five rows of scales. Subcaudal scales nine, excluding the terminal spine. Terminal spine large, stout base and dark brown. Abbreviations: ED, eye diameter; HR, head radius; HWE, head width; IN, internasal distance; INORB, interorbital distance; RL, rostral length; RW1, rostral width; MBD, midbody diameter. Skull osteology ( N = 1; MZUSP S-023380): The length of the skull is 6.15 mm, the width is 2.92 mm. The snout region has a globular enlarged-shape and highly consolidated. The snout articulates with the braincase by the nasal and prefrontal sutures and with the frontal bone. The anteroventral region of the premaxilla has a short backward process. The midsagittal lamina separates both sides of the premaxilla (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla is confluent with the mid-dorsal laminae of the nasals and with the mid-dorsal ridges of the vomeronasal cupola of the septomaxillae (Fig. 5). The lamina of the premaxilla and the nasal laminae are in contact, forming a continuous bony septum separating the olfactory chambers (Fig. 5B). The medial side of the maxilla has a shallow depression (or fossa), where lodges the maxillary process of the palatine. The palatine fossa is on the lateral side of the maxilla, in the region of the articular fossa. The palatine fossa is large with a diameter of 0.25 mm long (Fig. 6A). The medial border of the maxilla is straight (Fig. 6A). The ventral pterygoid process of the palatine is straight and ventrally directed (Fig. 7A). The retroarticular process projects in parallel to the horizontal plane of the articular. The angle between mandibular condyle articulation and the retroarticular process of the compound bone is close to 90° (Fig. 8A). The edentulous dentary is restricted to the distal end of the mandible, articulating mainly with the splenial. The dorsal side of the dentary is flat and pierced by two foramina (Fig. 9A). Coloration of the holotype in preserƲatiƲe: Dorsum (13/13/13 row scales) dark brown (Supporting Information, Fig. S3A), venter (5/5/5 rows scales) yellowish cream (Supporting Information, Fig. S3B). Dorsal portions of snout yellowish cream, with a dark brown spot, covering both rostral and nasal scales (two-thirds of snout) (Fig. 4A, B). Ventral portions of snout yellowish cream and few pigmented (Fig. 4C). Symphysial region yellowish cream and immaculate (Fig. 4C). Dorsal head scales (supraoculars, frontal, postfrontal, parietals and occipitals) dark brown. Dorsal portions of lateral head scales (ocular, nasal and lower nasal) and ventral portions yellowish cream with dark brown spots. Cloacal plate pale yellowish cream and terminal spine dark brown (Fig. 4A–C). Etymology: The name is a homage to Brazilian composer, singer and political activist Caetano Emanuel Viana Telles Veloso, better known as Caetano Veloso. Caetano is one of the most famous Brazilians born in the state of Bahia (in 1942), the same state in which the new species occurs. He became known for his participation in the Brazilian musical movement ‘ Tropicalismo ’ that encompassed theatre, poetry and music in the 1960s, at the beginning of the Brazilian military dictatorship. Veloso is also a well-known conservationist, acting to give voice to the preservation of the Brazilian natural environments and to indigenous resilience. Distribution and habitat: Amerotyphlops caetanoi is known only from Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina, in the BR 144 Road, situated at 2 km from the municipality of Lençóis, state of Bahia, Brazil (Fig. 10B). This region is one of the largest upland Atlantic dry forest enclaves of the east-central Bahia state (Veloso et al., 1991). The phytophysiognomy corresponds to a submontane seasonal semi-deciduous forest (Couto et al., 2011; Braz et al., 2013), ranging from 400 to 600 m a.s.l., with an annual average of temperature and rainfall of 20 °C and 100 mm, respectively (Funch et al., 2009). This area presents a non-continuous canopy, consisting of tall trees (approximately 10–16 m), and a subcanopy, consisting of medium-height trees (approximately 6–9 m), with a well-established and preserved understory (Couto et al., 2011)., Published as part of Graboski, Roberta, Arredondo, Juan C., Grazziotin, Felipe G., Guerra-Fuentes, Ricardo Arturo, Da Silva, Ariane A. A., Prudente, Ana L. C., Pinto, Roberta R., Rodrigues, Miguel T., Bonatto, Sandro L. & Zaher, Hussam, 2023, Revealing the cryptic diversity of the widespread and poorly known South American blind snake genus Amerotyphlops (Typhlopidae: Scolecophidia) through integrative taxonomy, pp. 719-751 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 197 on pages 726-730, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac059, http://zenodo.org/record/7695978, {"references":["Veloso HP, Rangel Filho ALR, Lima JCA. 1991. Classificacao da Vegetacao brasileira, adaptada a um sistema uniVersal. Rio de Janeiro: Ministerio da Economia, Fazenda e Planejamento, Fundacao Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, Diretoria de Geociencias, Departamento de Recursos Naturais e Estudos Ambientais.","Couto APL, Funch LS, Conceicao AA. 2011. Composicao floristica e fisionomia de floresta estacional semidecidua submontana na Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brasil. Rodriguesia 62: 391 - 405. Doi: 10.1590 / 2175 - 7860201162213.","Braz DM, Jacques EL, Somner GV, Sylvestre LS, Rosa MMT, Pereira-Moura MVL, Germano Filho P, Couto AVS, Amorim TA. 2013. Restinga de Praia das Neves, ES, Brasil: caracterizacao fitofisionomica, floristica e conservacao. Biota Neotropica 13: 315 - 331. Doi: 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032013000300032.","Funch RR, Harley RM, Funch LS. 2009. Mapping and evaluation of the state of conservation of the vegetation in and surrounding the Chapada Diamantina National Park, NE Brazil. Biota Neotropica 9: 21 - 30. Doi: 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032009000200001."]}

Chromobacterium violaceumis one of millions of species of free-living microorganisms that populate the soil and water in the extant areas of tropical biodiversity around the world. Its complete genome sequence reveals (i) extensive alternative pathways for energy generation, (ii) ≈500 ORFs for transport-related proteins, (iii) complex and extensive systems for stress adaptation and motility, and (iv) widespread utilization of quorum sensing for control of inducible systems, all of which underpin the versatility and adaptability of the organism. The genome also contains extensive but incomplete arrays of ORFs coding for proteins associated with mammalian pathogenicity, possibly involved in the occasional but often fatal cases of humanC. violaceuminfection. There is, in addition, a series of previously unknown but important enzymes and secondary metabolites including paraquat-inducible proteins, drug and heavy-metal-resistance proteins, multiple chitinases, and proteins for the detoxification of xenobiotics that may have biotechnological applications.