1. Qualitative Variation among Commercial Immunoassays for Detection of Measles-Specific IgG
- Author
-
Sun B. Sowers, Kevin B. Pannell, Donald R. Latner, Christine Badeau, Phili Wong, Kiana Anthony, Brandi M. Limbago, Carole J. Hickman, Heather Colley, Manisha Patel, Van Leung-Pineda, Cristina Interiano, Paul A. Rota, Yetunde F Fakile, and Jessica Coates
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Microbiology (medical) ,030106 microbiology ,Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ,Antibodies, Viral ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Measles ,Neutralization ,Measles virus ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Immune system ,Neutralization Tests ,Immunity ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Immunoassays ,Neutralizing antibody ,Immunoassay ,biology ,business.industry ,Gold standard (test) ,biology.organism_classification ,medicine.disease ,Immunoglobulin G ,Immunology ,biology.protein ,Antibody ,business - Abstract
Measurement of measles virus-specific IgG is used to assess presumptive evidence of immunity among immunocompetent individuals with uncertain immune or vaccination status. False-negative test results may lead to unnecessary quarantine and exclusion from activities such as employment, education, and travel or result in unnecessary revaccination. In contrast, false-positive results may fail to identify susceptible individuals and promote spread of disease by those who are exposed and unprotected. To better understand the performance characteristics of tests to detect measles IgG, we compared five widely used, commercially available measles IgG test platforms using a set of 223 well-characterized serum samples. Measles virus neutralizing antibodies were also measured by in vitro plaque reduction neutralization, the gold standard method, and compared to IgG test results. Discrepant results were observed for samples in the low-positive ranges of the most sensitive tests, but there was good agreement across platforms for IgG-negative sera and for samples with intermediate to high levels of IgG. False-negative test results occurred in approximately 11% of sera, which had low levels of neutralizing antibody.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF