Search

Frailty is a clinical syndrome associated with slow recovery after vascular surgery. However, the degree and length of functional impairment frail patients experience after surgery is unclear. The objective of this study was to prospectively measure changes in functional status among frail and non-frail patients undergoing a spectrum of different vascular surgery procedures.Patients consented to undergo elective minor and major vascular surgery procedures at an academic medical center between May 2018 and March 2019 were prospectively identified. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent provider assessment of frailty using the validated Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), as well as baseline assessment of functional status using the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) index and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL) index. These same instruments were used to evaluate each patient's functional status at 2-weeks, 1-month, 1-year, and 2-year time points following surgery. Changes in iADL and ADL scores among frail (CFS ≥5) and non-frail patients were compared using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and logistic regression models.A total of 126 patients were assessed before and after minor (55%) and major (45%) vascular procedures, of which 43 patients (34%) were determined to be frail prior to surgery. Frail patients were older and more likely than non-frail patients to have medical comorbidities including chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or diabetes (all P .05). When compared with the non-frail cohort, frail patients had significantly lower ADL and iADL scores before surgery and experienced a greater decline in ability to independently complete ADL and iADL activities after surgery that was sustained at 2 years (P .05 and P .001, respectively). After risk-adjustment, frailty was associated with an increased likelihood of decline in ADLs (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-15.4; P .05) and iADLs (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-15.1; P .001) at 2 years following surgery.Frail patients experience a significant decline in ability to perform ADL and iADLs that persists 2 years following vascular surgery. These data highlight the degree of functional decline occurring immediately following surgery, as well as risk for long-term, sustained impairment that should be shared with frail patients before undergoing a procedure.

Program directors in surgical disciplines need more tools from the ACGME to help them use Milestone ratings to improve trainees' performance. This is especially true in competencies that are notoriously difficult to measure, such as professionalism (PROF) and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS). It is now widely understood that skills in these two areas have direct impact on patient care outcomes. This study investigated the potential for generating early predictors of final Milestone ratings within the PROF and ICS competency categories.This retrospective cohort study utilized Milestone ratings from all ACGME-accredited vascular surgery training programs, covering residents and fellows who completed training in June 2019. The outcome measure studied was the rate of achieving the recommended graduation target of Milestone Level 4 (possible range: 1-5), while the predictors were the Milestone ratings attained at earlier stages of training. Predictive probability values (PPVs) were calculated for each of the 3 PROF and two ICS sub-competencies to estimate the probability of trainees not reaching the recommended graduation target based on their previous Milestone ratings.All ACGME-accredited vascular surgery training programs within the United States.All trainees completing a 2 year vascular surgery fellowship (VSF) in June 2019 (n = 119) or a 5 year integrated vascular surgery residency (IVSR) in June 2019 (n = 52) were included in the analyses.The overall rate of failing to achieve the recommended graduation target across all PROF and ICS sub-competencies ranged from 7.7% to 21.8% of all trainees. For trainees with a Milestone rating at ≤ 2.5 with 1 year remaining in their training program, the predictive probability of not achieving the recommended graduation target ranged from 37.0% to 71.5% across sub-competencies, with the highest risks observed under PROF for "Administrative Tasks" (71.5%) and under ICS for "Communication with the Healthcare Team" (56.7%).As many as 1 in 4 vascular surgery trainees did not achieve the ACGME vascular surgery Milestones targets for graduation in at least one of the PROF and ICS sub-competencies. Biannual ACGME Milestone assessment ratings of PROF and ICS during early training can be used to predict achievement of competency targets at time of graduation. Early clues to problems in PROF and ICS enable programs to address potential deficits early in training to ensure competency in these essential non-technical skills prior to entering unsupervised practice.

The quality and effectiveness of vascular surgery education should be evaluated based on patient care outcomes. To investigate predictive associations between trainee performance and subsequent patient outcomes, a critical first step is to determine the conceptual alignment of educational competencies with clinical outcomes in practice. We sought to generate expert consensus on the conceptual alignment of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Vascular Surgery subcompetencies with patient care outcomes across different Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registries.A national panel of vascular surgeons with expertise in both clinical care and education were recruited to participate in a modified Delphi expert consensus building process to map ACGME Vascular Surgery subcompetencies (educational markers of resident performance) to VQI clinical modules (patient outcomes). A master list of items for rating was created, including the 31 ACGME Vascular Surgery subcompetencies and 8 VQI clinical registries (endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, open abdominal aortic aneurysm, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stent, infrainguinal, suprainguinal, and peripheral vascular intervention). These items were entered into an iterative Delphi process. Positive consensus was reached when 75% or more of the participants ranked an item as mandatory. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used to evaluate consistency between experts for each Delphi round.A total of 13 experts who contributed to the development of the Vascular Surgery Milestones participated; 12 experts (92%) participated in both rounds of the Delphi process. Two rounds of Delphi were conducted, as suggested by excellent expert agreement (round 1, ICC = 0.79 [95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.84]; round 2, ICC = 0.97 [95% confidence interval, 0.960-.98]). Using the predetermined consensus cutoff threshold, the Delphi process reduced the number of subcompetencies mapped to patient care outcomes from 31 to a range of 9 to 15 across the 8 VQI clinical registries. Practice-based learning and improvement, and professionalism subcompetencies were identified as less relevant to patient outcome variables captured by the VQI registries after the final round, and the only the systems-based practice subcompetency that was identified as relevant was radiation safety in two of the endovascular registries.A national panel of vascular surgeon experts reported a high degree of agreement on the relevance of ACGME subcompetencies to patient care outcomes as captured in the VQI clinical registry. Systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, and professionalism competencies were identified as less relevant to patient outcomes after specific surgical procedures.

Vascular surgery is facing an impending workforce shortage as the population ages and the demand for vascular surgical services increases. The integrated vascular surgery residency (0+5) paradigm is well-established and provides a mechanism to increase the number of board-certified vascular surgeons. Recruitment of medical students to these programs has proven challenging with unfilled positions in each of the past 2 years. The aim of this study is to explore factors that influence medical students' interest in vascular surgery and their decision to ultimately pursue a career in the field.Medical students listed on the Society for Vascular Surgery "Find a VSIG (Vascular Surgery Interest Group)" webpage were contacted via email to participate in the study. A snowball sampling technique was employed to recruit additional participants, including recent medical school graduates who had matched into a 0+5 program. Fifteen students participated in 5 focus groups. Directed content analysis was employed to qualitatively analyze focus group transcripts.Five domains were identified as influencing students' decision to pursue vascular surgery. Experiential learning facilitated early exploration of the field. The intellectuality of the specialty was a feature that attracted students to vascular surgery. In addition, the professional identify of vascular surgeons as comprehensive care providers was appealing. Students identified with their mentors' relationships as observed during clinical encounters. Long-term mentorship was important in sustaining students' interest.Medical students pursue a career in vascular surgery based on early exposure to the specialty, experiential learning through hands-on VSIG events, clinical experiences, and longitudinal faculty mentorship. The unique aspects of the specialty, including professional identity and intellectuality, should be highlighted to both attract and maintain students' interest in the field. These findings can be used by national vascular surgery leaders, practicing vascular surgeons, and faculty and student leadership of VSIGs to optimize recruitment programs and increase the vascular surgery workforce.

Transitioning from trainee to attending surgeon requires learners to become educators. The purpose of this study is to evaluate educational strategies utilized by surgeons, define gaps in preparation for operative teaching, and identify opportunities to support this transition.A web-based, Association of Surgical Education approved survey was distributed to attending surgeons.There were 153 respondents. Narrating actions was the most frequently reported educational model, utilized by 74% of junior faculty [JF] (0-5yrs) and 63% of senior faculty [SF] (6yrs). Other models used included educational time-outs (29% JF, 27% SF), BID teaching model (36% JF, 51% SF), and Zwisch model (13% JF, 25% SF). Compared with 91% JF, 65% SF reported struggling with instruction (p 0.001). Five themes emerged as presenting difficulty during the resident to attending transition: lack of relationships, ongoing learning, systems-based, cognitive load, impression management.Our results represent a needs assessment in the transition from learner to educator in the OR.

Background Surgeons provide patient care in complex health care systems and must be able to participate in improving both personal performance and the performance of the system. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Vascular Surgery Milestones are utilized to assess vascular surgery fellows’ (VSF) achievement of graduation targets in the competencies of Systems Based Practice (SBP) and Practice Based Learning and Improvement (PBLI). We investigate the predictive value of semiannual milestones ratings for final achievement within these competencies at the time of graduation. Methods National ACGME milestones data were utilized for analysis. All trainees entering the 2-year vascular surgery fellowship programs in July 2016 were included in the analysis (n = 122). Predictive probability values (PPVs) were obtained for each SBP and PBLI sub-competencies by biannual review periods, to estimate the probability of VSFs not reaching the recommended graduation target based on their previous milestones ratings. Results The rate of nonachievement of the graduation target level 4.0 on the SBP and PBLI sub-competencies at the time of graduation for VSFs was 13.1–25.4%. At the first time point of assessment, 6 months into the fellowship program, the PPV of the SBP and PBLI milestones for nonachievement of level 4.0 upon graduation ranged from 16.3–60.2%. Six months prior to graduation, the PPVs across the 6 sub-competencies ranged from 14.6–82.9%. Conclusions A significant percentage of VSFs do not achieve the ACGME Vascular Surgery Milestone targets for graduation in the competencies of SBP and PBLI, suggesting a need to improve curricula and assessment strategies in these domains across vascular surgery fellowship programs. Reported milestones levels across all time point are predictive of ultimate achievement upon graduation and should be utilized to provide targeted feedback and individualized learning plans to ensure graduates are prepared to engage in personal and health care system improvement once in unsupervised practice.

The use of a robotic surgical platform has become common place in thoracic surgery programs throughout the United States. Formal training paradigms need to be reevaluated to allow for effective and efficient training of thoracic surgery residents and fellows. The utilization of video-based coaching and simulation are effective adjuncts in robotics training.

Background Academic institutions have increasingly focused on educating physicians and surgeons in concepts of value-based care, including quality improvement (QI). The extent to which QI curricular competencies are addressed in specialty surgical residency training is unclear. Methods A survey instrument was developed by content experts and sent to Vascular Surgery and Urology residents electronically. Descriptive statistics and bivariate associations were calculated using StataMP 13.1. Results Vascular Surgery and Urology residents reported exposure to similar types of QI curriculum. Fewer than half of residents reported achieving targets for graduation (Vascular 31%, Urology 42%) related to QI, and few residents in either group felt very well-prepared to lead a QI initiative (Vascular 13%, Urology 8%). Conclusion QI education in surgical specialty training amongst Vascular Surgery and Urology residencies is similar and insufficient. Surgical specialties may benefit from collaborative efforts to improve the quality of QI education.

Objective:The aim of this study is to describe the current state of robotic surgery training among Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residency programs in the United States.Methods:This is a national survey study among OHNS residents. All OHNS residency programs were identified via the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. A total of 64/127 (50.3%) of OHNS programs were selected based on a random number generator. The main outcome measure was the number of OHNS residents with access to robotic surgery training and assessment of operative experience in robotic surgery among those residents.Results:A total of 140 OHNS residents participated in the survey, of which 59.3% (n = 83) were male. Response rate was 40.2%. Respondents came from middle 50.0% (n = 70), southern 17.8% (n = 25), western 17.8% (n = 25), and eastern sections 14.3% (n = 20). Most respondents (94.3%, n = 132) reported that their institution utilized a robot for head and neck surgery. Resident experience at the bedside increased in the junior years of training and console experience increased across the years particularly for more senior residents. However, 63.4% of residents reported no operative experience at the console. Only 11.4% of programs have a structured robotics training program.Conclusion:This survey indicated that nearly all OHNS residencies utilize robotic surgery in their clinical practice with residents receiving little formal education in robotics or experience at the console. OHNS residencies should aim to increase access to training opportunities in order to increase resident competency.Level of Evidence:IV

Background The ACGME mandates that residency programs provide training related to high value care (HVC). The purpose of this study was to explore HVC education in general surgery residency programs. Methods An electronic survey was distributed to general surgery residents in geographically diverse programs. Results The response rate was 29% (181/619). Residents reported various HVC components in their curricula. Less than half felt HVC is very important for their future practice (44%) and only 15% felt confident they could lead a QI initiative in practice. Only 20% of residents reported participating in a root cause analysis and less than one-third of residents (30%) were frequently exposed to cost considerations. Conclusion Few residents feel prepared to lead quality improvement initiatives, have participated in patient safety processes, or are aware of patients’ costs of care. This underscores the need for improved scope and quality of HVC education and establishment of formal curricula.

Background Frailty is a syndrome where the ability to cope with acute physiological stress is compromised, although it is unclear what impact this stress has on long-term outcomes. Vascular-Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity is a validated method for calculating levels of stress associated with vascular procedures. We designed this study to evaluate the long-term impact of different levels of surgical stress among frail older patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures. Methods We identified all independently living patients who underwent prospective frailty assessment followed by an elective vascular surgery procedure captured in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry (endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm [AAA] repair, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, suprainguinal and infrainguinal bypass, peripheral vascular intervention, carotid endarterectomy, and open AAA) at an academic institution between January 2016 and July 2018. Patient- and procedure-level data were obtained from our institutional data warehouse and Vascular Quality Initiative database, and used to calculate Vascular-Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity scores. The association between frailty and composite outcome of any major complications (surgical site infection; graft thrombectomy; major amputation; adverse cardiac, pulmonary, or neurologic event; acute renal insufficiency; and/or reoperation related to the index procedure), nonhome living status, or death within 1 year after low-, medium-, and high-stress vascular procedures was evaluated using bivariate and logistic regression models. Results A total of 163 patients were identified (70% male, mean age 67.8 years) who underwent open AAA repair (6%), endovascular AAA repair (21%), thoracic endovascular aortic repair (7%), suprainguinal bypass (5%), infrainguinal bypass (18%), carotid endarterectomy (18%), or peripheral vascular interventions (25%), which included 44 (27%) patients diagnosed with frailty before surgery. Overall, frail patients had significantly higher rates of the 1-year composite outcome (48% frail versus 27% nonfrail; P = 0.012) when compared with nonfrail patients, with a significant dose-dependent effect as the level of stress increased. In comparison, increasing levels of surgical stress had a negligible effect on long-term outcomes among nonfrail patients. The interaction between frailty and high surgical stress was found in adjusted regression models to be a significant predictor of adverse outcomes within 1 year after vascular surgery (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3–8.6; P Conclusions Frail patients who undergo high-stress vascular procedures have a significantly higher rate of complications leading to loss of functional independence and mortality within the year after their surgery. These data suggest that estimates of surgical stress should be incorporated into clinical decision making for frail older patients before and after surgery.

Background High value care (HVC), maximizing quality while minimizing cost, has become a major focus of surgical practice. Effective education in healthcare value concepts is critical during residency to ensure graduates are able to deliver high value surgical care and participate in interprofessional teams to improve the system. Study Design An HVC curriculum was implemented at a single academic medical center. Sixty-six residents from general surgery, plastic surgery, otolaryngology, and urology completed the curriculum over 3 academic years (2016 to 2019). The 1-year curriculum taught residents the concepts of HVC before participating in a value improvement project the following year. Residents’ knowledge of value was assessed pre- and post-participation using a validated assessment tool, the Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R), and a curriculum-specific assessment tool. The overall success of the program was evaluated by assessing residents’ skills in completing value improvement projects using a novel scoring rubric. Results After completing the program, residents expressed improved confidence in their ability to complete a value improvement project. Residents also demonstrated improved knowledge on the curriculum-specific assessment (4.7/13 to 10.9/13) and the scenario assessment using the QIKAT-R tool (8.5/27 to 16.4/27). As the program underwent iterative improvements each year, the quality of the residents’ projects also improved, as assessed by the novel scoring rubric. Conclusions Multimodal assessment demonstrated improvement in residents’ objective knowledge of HVC principles, residents’ ability to design and lead clinical value improvement projects, and residents’ confidence they could use HVC principles in their current and future practice.

Vascular surgery integrated residency (VSIR) programs are highly competitive; however, criteria for resident selection remain opaque and non-standardized. The already unclear selection criteria will be further impacted by the impending transition of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 from numeric scores to a binary pass/fail outcome. The purpose of this study was to investigate the historical and anticipated selection criteria of VSIR applicants.This was a cross-sectional, nationwide, 59-item survey that was sent to all VSIR program directors (PDs). Data was analyzed using the Fisher exact test if categorical and the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test if ordinal.Forty of 69 PDs (58%) responded to the survey. University-based programs constituted 85% of responders. Most VSIR PDs (65%) reported reviewing between 101 to 150 applications for 1 to 2 positions annually. Forty-two percent of the responding PDs reported sole responsibility for inviting applicants to interview, whereas 50% had a team of faculty responsible for reviewing applications. On a five-point Likert scale, letters of recommendation (LOR) from vascular surgeons or colleagues (a person the PD knows) were the most important objective criteria. Work within a team structure was rated highest among subjective criteria. The majority of respondents (72%) currently use the Step 1 score as a primary method to screen applicants. Regional differences in use of Step 1 score as a primary screening method were: Midwest (100%), Northeast (76%), South (43%), and West (40%) (P = .01). PDs responded that that they will use USMLE Step 2 score (42%) and LOR (10%) to replace USMLE Step 1 score. The current top ranked selection criteria are letters from a vascular surgeon, USMLE Step 1 score and overall LOR. The proposed top ranked selection criteria after transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail include LOR overall followed by Step 2 score.This is the first study to evaluate the selection criteria used by PDs for VSIR. The landscape of VSIR selection criteria is shifting and increasing transparency is essential to applicants' understanding of the selection process. The transition of USMLE Step 1 to a pass/fail report will shift the attention to Step 2 scores and elevate the importance of other relatively more subjective criteria. Defining VSIR program selection criteria is an important first step toward establishing holistic review processes that are transparent and equitable.

Statins are considered standard-of-care medical therapy for patients undergoing lower extremity bypass (LEB) procedures for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). It is unclear, however, whether up-titrating and maintaining patients on higher-intensity statin medications following LEB improves limb salvage outcomes. This study was designed to evaluate whether high-intensity statin therapy impacts the risk of amputation and reintervention following LEB for patients with CLTI.The IBM MarketScan database was used to identify adult patients (18-99 years old) who underwent a LEB for CLTI between 2008 and 2017. Patients lacking insurance covering drug reimbursement or those who already had undergone amputation before time of bypass were excluded. Using pharmacy claims and national drug codes to define statin intensity, patients were stratified into three groups: high-intensity, low-intensity, and limited statin therapy. The association between intensity of statin therapy and need for reintervention and/or major amputation after LEB was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models.A total of 25,907 patients who underwent LEB for CLTI were identified, of which 6696 (26%) were maintained on high-dose statins, 9297 (36%) were on low-dose statins, and 9914 (38%) had inconsistent pharmacy claims for statin therapy after surgery. Patients on high-intensity statins were, on average, younger and more likely to be male with comorbid disease (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, renal insufficiency, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and tobacco abuse) than patients on low-intensity statins or limited statin therapy (P .001 for all comparisons). Following LEB, 6649 patients (25.6%) required a reintervention, and 2550 patients (9.8%) went on to have a major amputation during follow-up. Patients maintained on high-intensity statins after LEB had a significantly lower likelihood of requiring a reintervention (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.51; P .001) or amputation (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.24-0.30; P .001) as compared with patients on limited statin therapy. Further, there was a dose-dependent effect for these outcomes relative to patients on low-intensity statins in risk-adjusted models, and it was independent of whether an autologous vein graft was used for the LEB. Finally, among patients who underwent a reintervention, high-dose statin therapy also significantly reduced the HR for subsequent amputation (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.18-0.25; P .001).Patients with CLTI on high-intensity therapy following LEB had a significantly lower risk of requiring subsequent reintervention and amputation when compared with patients on low-intensity statins or with limited statin use. These data suggest that patients with CLTI should be up-titrated and/or maintained on high-intensity statins following revascularization whenever possible.

Background In-training examinations (ITEs) are intended for low-stakes, formative assessment of residents' knowledge, but are increasingly used for high-stake purposes, such as to predict board examination failures. Objective The aim of this review was to investigate the relationship between performance on ITEs and board examination performance across medical specialties. Methods A search of the literature for studies assessing the strength of the relationship between ITE and board examination performance from January 2000 to March 2019 was completed. Results were categorized based on the type of statistical analysis used to determine the relationship between ITE performance and board examination performance. Results Of 1407 articles initially identified, 89 articles underwent full-text review, and 32 articles were included in this review. There was a moderate-strong relationship between ITE and board examination performance, and ITE scores significantly predict board examination scores for the majority of studies. Performing well on an ITE predicts a passing outcome for the board examination, but there is less evidence that performing poorly on an ITE will result in failing the associated specialty board examination. Conclusions There is a moderate to strong correlation between ITE performance and subsequent performance on board examinations. That the predictive value for passing the board examination is stronger than the predictive value for failing calls into question the “common wisdom” that ITE scores can be used to identify “at risk” residents. The graduate medical education community should continue to exercise caution and restraint in using ITE scores for moderate to high-stakes decisions.

Objective To determine the quality improvement (QI) experiences of urology residents in the United States. Materials and Methods An Institutional Review Board approved national survey of Urology residents was administered in June 2019. The survey instrument sought to understand QI curricular methods and experiences of urology residents as well as their knowledge of QI fundamentals. Results Of 465 invited residents, 159 (34%) responded. Respondents represented all 8 AUA sections. The majority of respondents self-identified as white (66%). Females made up 30% of respondents. Less than 1/3 of residents (32%) report use of online modules, whereas nearly 2/3 (63%) report lecture-based didactics. Fifteen percent of residents report no QI curriculum. While nearly 2/3 of residents report receiving training in QI principles (64%), far less report receiving training in how to apply QI methodology (44%). Only 29% of residents report being required to lead a QI project. No differences were seen by training level. Only 3 respondents had heard of the Institute of Medicine's aims for quality improvement. Respondents had better knowledge of process, balancing and outcome measures, but less than half of respondents (49%) were able to correctly identify all 3. Having any QI curriculum is associated with correctly answering knowledge questions (P = .03). Conclusion From a resident perspective, urology residency programs currently provide QI curricula that are inadequate to ensure residents achieve Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestones. It is imperative the urology community as a whole address these curricular gaps to ensure graduates are prepared to deliver high-quality, cost-conscious care to their patients once in practice.

Objective Over one third of general surgery residents interrupt their clinical training to pursue dedicated research time (DRT), which has financial implications for programs and residents. Studies have examined the impact of DRT on academic outcomes, but little is known about why residents pursue DRT. Therefore, this study aimed to examine resident motivations regarding DRT in order to gain an understanding of resident goals and challenges surrounding this phase of training. Design Surgical residents currently participating in DRT and residents considering completing DRT were recruited to participate. Members of the research team at each institution conducted interviews and focus groups, which were recorded and transcribed. Data was analyzed using the qualitative method of open and focused coding. Identified themes guided the development of a conceptual framework. Setting Interviews and focus groups were held at three geographically diverse US academic health centers. Participants Twenty-one surgery residents participated. Results Reasons for pursuing DRT fell into 1 of 3 themes: strategic career planning, professional development, and personal rejuvenation. Residents described the perceived need for publications or networking to enhance future competitiveness for desired fellowships or academic appointments. Residents also expressed the desire to have time for career exploration and to cultivate mentorship for their professional career. The need to take time off for more personal reasons, including burnout, was pervasive. Additionally, many in DRT felt under-supported in developing their research skills and expressed a desire for more formal instruction and guidance from mentors. Conclusions General surgery residents’ motivations to pursue DRT are multifactorial. Professional development is a pervasive motivation and includes learning skills that can be applied to future research. Current DRT programs may be inadequate in supporting residents to achieve this goal. These results can be used to inform programmatic efforts to optimize DRT for residents and mentors alike.

Background Integrated vascular surgery residency, or “0+5,” programs provide education in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies of Systems-Based Practice (SBP) and Practice-Based Learning and Improvement (PBLI), which include milestones related to quality improvement (QI). It is unclear what QI curricula are in place in 0+5 programs nationally or how 0+5 residents perceive the importance of QI. Objective The purpose of this study is to assess current 0+5 residents’ knowledge, experiences with, and attitudes about QI. Design A survey was developed using the ACGME Common Program Requirements and Milestones pertaining to QI. All 0+5 residents from 2017 to 2018 academic year were emailed an electronic link to the survey. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations were calculated using Stata/MP version 13.1. Setting All 0+5 vascular surgery residency programs in the United State (n = 52). Participants The survey was completed by 35% (n = 90/257) of 0+5 residents, representing 75% of 0+5 programs in the United States (n = 39/52). Results Forty-one percent of respondents felt that applying QI methods is very important and 33% felt that QI education is very important for their future work, however, just 13% felt very prepared to lead a QI initiative. Residents’ perceptions of preparedness to lead QI projects and the importance they attached to QI education were significantly influenced by their participation in a QI project (p = 0.003 and p = 0.038 respectively). Finally, just 8% (n = 6) of residents responded correctly to all 13 knowledge-based questions and these residents felt better prepared to lead a QI initiative compared to those who answered incorrectly (p = 0.002). Conclusions Most 0+5 residents report participation in a QI project during residency, however, few feel prepared to lead a QI initiative in practice. Furthermore, only half of PGY5 0+5 residents report achieving specific ACGME targets for graduation pertaining to QI. Current QI curricula in 0+5 programs may be inadequate in teaching fundamental QI concepts and achieving ACGME competency targets for graduation.

Psychological safety is known to improve team performance and organizational learning. The related concept of "educational safety" has recently emerged to describe an environment in which learners can unreservedly focus on learning and professional growth, without worrying about the potential repercussions of interpersonal risk-taking. Educational safety is crucial for optimal learning in clinical environments, and yet is difficult to establish due to constant performance assessment, fear of failure, and pervasive hierarchies. In this perspective, we propose a framework for conceptualizing educational safety in surgical learning environments, and explore current threats to educational safety. We also discuss strategies for combating these threats, as well as the importance of further research to evaluate the impact of educational safety on surgical learning outcomes.

This study aims to investigate at-risk scores of semiannual Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestone ratings for vascular surgical trainees' final achievement of competency targets.ACGME Milestones assessments have been collected since 2015 for Vascular Surgery. It is unclear whether milestone ratings throughout training predict achievement of recommended performance targets upon graduation.National ACGME Milestones data were utilized for analyses. All trainees completing 2-year vascular surgery fellowships in June 2018 and 5-year integrated vascular surgery residencies in June 2019 were included. A generalized estimating equations model was used to obtain at-risk scores for each of the 31 sub-competencies by semiannual review periods, to estimate the probability of trainees achieving the recommended graduation target based on their previous ratings.122 VSFs (95.3%) and 52 IVSRs (100%) were included. VSFs and IVSRs did not achieve level 4.0 competency targets at a rate of 1.6-25.4% across sub-competencies, which was not significantly different between the two groups for any of the sub-competencies (p=0.161-0.999). Trainees were found to be at greater risk of not achieving competency targets when lower milestone ratings were assigned, and at later time-points in training. At a milestone rating of ≤ 2.5, with one year remaining prior to graduation, the at-risk score for not achieving the target level 4.0 milestone ranged from 2.9% - 77.9% for VSFs and 33.3% - 75.0% for IVSRs.The ACGME Milestones provide early diagnostic and predictive information for vascular surgery trainees' achievement of competence at completion of training.

It is unclear whether shortened training of integrated vascular surgery residencies (IVSR) has detrimental effects on graduates' performance. We sought to investigate whether there is a difference in frail patient outcomes based on the training paradigm completed by their surgeon.IVSR and vascular surgery fellowship (VSF)-trained surgeons were identified in the American Board of Surgery database and linked to the Vascular Quality Initiative registry (2013-2019) to evaluate provider-specific patient outcomes for frail patients following vascular procedures using mixed-effects logistic regression.105 IVSR graduates (31%) and 233 VSF graduates (69%) were included. Composite 1-year outcomes of frail patients were comparable between IVSR and VSF-trained surgeons following carotid endarterectomy (16%-IVSR vs 25%-VSF; p = 0.76), lower extremity revascularization (37%-IVSR vs 36%-VSF; p = 0.83), and aortic aneurysm repair (25%-IVSR vs 23%-VSF; p = 0.89).The type of training paradigm completed by vascular surgeons was not associated with differences in their post-operative outcomes in frail patients.

Value is defined as health outcomes important to patients relative to cost of achieving those outcomes: Value = Quality/Cost. For inguinal hernia repair, Level 1 evidence shows no differences in long-term functional status or recurrence rates when comparing surgical approaches. Differences in value reside within differences in cost. The aim of this study is to compare the value of different surgical approaches to inguinal hernia repair: Open (Open-IH), Laparoscopic (Lap-IH), and Robotic (R-TAPP).Variable and fixed hospital costs were compared among consecutive Open-IH, Lap-IH, and R-TAPP repairs (100 each) performed in a university hospital. Variable costs (VC) including direct materials, labor, and variable overhead ($/min operating room [OR] time) were evaluated using Value Driven Outcomes, an internal activity-based costing methodology. Variable and fixed costs were allocated using full absorption costing to evaluate the impact of surgical approach on value. As cost data is proprietary, differences in cost were normalized to Open-IH cost.Compared to Open-IH, VC for Lap-IH were 1.02X higher (including a 0.81X reduction in cost for operating room [OR] time). For R-TAPP, VC were 2.11X higher (including 1.36X increased costs for OR time). With allocation of fixed cost, a Lap-IH was 1.03X more costly, whereas R-TAPP was 3.18X more costly than Open-IH. Using equivalent recurrence as the quality metric in the value equation, Lap-IH decreases value by 3% and R-TAPP by 69% compared to Open-IH.Use of higher cost technology to repair inguinal hernias reduces value. Incremental health benefits must be realized to justify increased costs. We expect payors and patients will incorporate value into payment decisions.

OBJECTIVE To assess the current barriers in robotic surgery training for general surgery residents. DESIGN Multi-institutional web-based survey. SETTING 9 academic medical centers with a general surgery residency. PARTICIPANTS General surgery residents of at least PGY-3 training level. RESULTS 163 general surgery residents were contacted with 80 responses (49.1%). The most common responders were PGY-3s (38.8%) followed by PGY-5s (27.5%). The Northeast represented 42.5% of responses. Colorectal cases were the most common robotic case residents were involved in (51.3%). Residents’ typical roles were assisting at the bedside (31.3%) and splitting time between assisting at the bedside and operating at the surgeon console (31.3%). 43% report to be either extremely or somewhat dissatisfied with their robotic surgery experience. 62.5% report they do not intend to integrate robotic surgery into their future practice. 93.8% of residents have a standardized robotic curriculum. 47.5% report using the simulator only during required didactic time with 52.5% having the robotic simulator conveniently located. The majority of residents report that the presence of dual consoles and first-assists in robotic cases enhance their robotic training (93% - 62%, respectively). 72.5% felt like they had more autonomy during laparoscopic cases and 96.8% of residents felt that an attendings’ lack of experience impacted their time operating at the surgeon console. CONCLUSIONS General surgery residents report lack of effective OR teaching, real clinical experience, and simulated experience as main barriers in their robotic surgery training. Dual consoles and first-assistants are favorably looked upon. Lack of attending experience and comfort were universally negatively associated with resident participation. For residents interested in robotic surgery, advocating for more robust investment in dual consoles, first-assistants, and faculty development would likely improve their robotic surgery training experience. However, residency programs should consider whether robotic surgery should be a core competency of an already time restricted training paradigm.

OBJECTIVE Value is defined as health outcomes important to patients relative to cost of achieving those outcomes: Value = Quality/Cost. For inguinal hernia repair, Level 1 evidence shows no differences in long-term functional status or recurrence rates when comparing surgical approaches. Differences in value reside within differences in cost. The aim of this study is to compare the value of different surgical approaches to inguinal hernia repair: Open (Open-IH), Laparoscopic (Lap-IH), and Robotic (R-TAPP). METHODS Variable and fixed hospital costs were compared among consecutive Open-IH, Lap-IH, and R-TAPP repairs (100 each) performed in a university hospital. Variable costs (VC) including direct materials, labor, and variable overhead ($/min operating room [OR] time) were evaluated using Value Driven Outcomes, an internal activity-based costing methodology. Variable and fixed costs were allocated using full absorption costing to evaluate the impact of surgical approach on value. As cost data is proprietary, differences in cost were normalized to Open-IH cost. RESULTS Compared to Open-IH, VC for Lap-IH were 1.02X higher (including a 0.81X reduction in cost for operating room [OR] time). For R-TAPP, VC were 2.11X higher (including 1.36X increased costs for OR time). With allocation of fixed cost, a Lap-IH was 1.03X more costly, whereas R-TAPP was 3.18X more costly than Open-IH. Using equivalent recurrence as the quality metric in the value equation, Lap-IH decreases value by 3% and R-TAPP by 69% compared to Open-IH. CONCLUSIONS Use of higher cost technology to repair inguinal hernias reduces value. Incremental health benefits must be realized to justify increased costs. We expect payors and patients will incorporate value into payment decisions.

Frailty and sarcopenia are related but independent conditions commonly diagnosed in older patients that can be used to assess their ability to tolerate the stress of major vascular surgery. For surgical decision-making, however, it is important to know the prognostic implications associated with each of these conditions. The study was designed to assess the association of frailty and sarcopenia phenotypes with long-term survival of patients undergoing surgical and nonsurgical management of vascular disease.We retrospectively reviewed all patients presenting to the vascular surgery clinic at an academic hospital between December 2015 and August 2017 who underwent prospective frailty assessment with the Clinical Frailty Scale and who had abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans performed within the preceding 12 months. A single axial CT image at the caudal end of the third lumbar vertebra was assessed to measure cross-sectional areas of skeletal muscle. Sarcopenia was defined by established criteria specific for male and female patients. After patients were stratified by frailty and sarcopenia diagnoses along with comorbidities, the association with all-cause mortality was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models.A total of 415 patients underwent both frailty and sarcopenia assessment, of whom 112 (27%) met sarcopenia criteria alone, 48 (12%) met only frailty criteria, and 56 (13%) met criteria for both phenotypes. There were 199 (48%) controls who met neither criterion. Vascular operations were performed in 167 (40%) patients after frailty and sarcopenia assessment, whereas 248 (60%) patients were managed nonoperatively with median (interquartile range) follow-up after CT imaging of 1.5 (1.1-2.2) years. Patients diagnosed with either phenotype were older (mean, 65 years vs 59 years; P .001) and more likely to be male (69% vs 54%; P .001) compared with patients without sarcopenia or frailty. Long-term survival was significantly decreased for patients diagnosed with either frailty alone or frailty and sarcopenia who underwent surgical or nonsurgical management (log-rank, P .001 for both comparisons). In multivariate regression models, however, frailty was the only independent variable (hazard ratio, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-18.7; P .001) that predicted mortality.Frailty and sarcopenia overlap to varying degrees in patients presenting to vascular surgery clinics and can be used alone or in combination to predict long-term survival of older patients. However, our data indicate that it was only the diagnosis of frailty that was an independent predictor of mortality and had the strongest prognostic significance in patients undergoing both surgical and nonoperative management.

Background The position of Vice Chair of Education (VCE) is increasingly common in Surgery Departments. The role remains ill-defined. The purpose of this study was to explore perceptions of Department Chairs (DCs) and Other Education Stakeholders (OESs) regarding the VCE role. Methods DCs and OESs at institutions with a VCE were surveyed. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations were calculated (SAS V9.4). Results The overall response rate was 25% (166/666). There were significant differences in whether DCs and OESs agree that the VCE supports others in fulfilling educational roles (95.2% vs 49.5%, p = 0.0002), is critical in achieving education missions (90.5% vs 56.6%, p = 0.0032), enhances the quality of education (95.3% vs 65.7%, p = 0.0174), and is important to education teams (95.0% vs 68.7%, p = 0.0464). Conclusions DCs value the VCE role more so than OESs, whom VCEs support. In order for VCEs to be effective educational leaders in Departments of Surgery, the needs of key stakeholders deserve further clarification.

Introduction Surgical faculty and residents are responsible for the clinical education of medical students during their core surgical clerkship, sub-internships, and clinical electives. Much attention has been paid to faculty development in teaching, as well as residents-as-teachers programs, to enhance student learning in the surgical environment. This focus to “train the trainers” has not addressed what medical students can do to take ownership of and improve their own learning, as partners in educational interactions. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate how medical students’ attitudes and actions can enhance clinical teaching interactions during surgical rotations. Methods Previously collected data from a multiple case study that explored the learning environment at a single academic medical center was analyzed to understand the roles that students play in their learning. The data includes transcriptions from semi-structured interviews with four 4th year mediacl students, three general surgery residents, and four surgery attendings, and focus groups with two sets of 3rd year medical students. Two authors employed thematic analysis to code the data. Results Findings were organized into five themes: eagerness, humility, confidence, team player, and adaptability. Each attitudinal theme was associated with specific actions that students adopted to encourage teaching behaviors from resident and faculty surgeons during their surgery rotations. Participants discussed the importance of students “seek[ing] out opportunities” for learning (eagerness) and being “willing to be wrong” (humility). Student expressions of confidence in their knowledge and skills were marked by following “steps that I know,” which signaled to teachers that they could be entrusted to participate in patient care. Students categorized as team players “follow[ed] up on information without specifically being told.” Finally, students categorized as adaptable responded to “immediate feedback” by making “adjustments.” Conclusions Medical students are important stakeholders and contributors to teaching interactions and are likely to impact their own learning experience through the adoption of key attitudes and associated actions.

Frailty, a clinical syndrome associated with loss of metabolic reserves, is prevalent among patients who present to vascular surgery clinics for evaluation. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a rapid assessment method shown to be highly specific for identifying frail patients. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether the preoperative CFS score could be used to predict loss of independence after major vascular procedures.We identified all patients living independently at home who were prospectively assessed using the CFS before undergoing an elective major vascular surgery procedure (admitted for24 hours) at an academic medical center between December 2015 and December 2017. Patient- and procedure-level clinical data were obtained from our institutional Vascular Quality Initiative registry database. The composite outcome of discharge to a nonhome location or 30-day mortality was evaluated using bivariate and multivariate regression models.A total of 134 independent patients were assessed using the CFS before they underwent elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (8%), endovascular aneurysm repair (26%), thoracic endovascular aortic repair (6%), suprainguinal bypass (6%), infrainguinal bypass (16%), carotid endarterectomy (19%), or peripheral vascular intervention (20%). Among 39 (29%) individuals categorized as being frail using the CFS, there was no significant difference in age or American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status compared with nonfrail patients. However, frail patients were significantly more likely to need mobility assistance after surgery (62% frail vs 22% nonfrail; P .01) and to be discharged to a nonhome location (22% frail vs 6% nonfrail; P = .01) or to die within 30 days after surgery (8% frail vs 0% nonfrail; P .01). Preoperative frailty was associated with a12-fold higher risk (odds ratio, 12.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.17-66.96; P .01) of 30-day mortality or loss of independence, independent of the vascular procedure undertaken.The CFS is a practical tool for assessing preoperative frailty among patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery and can be used to predict likelihood of requiring discharge to a nursing facility or death after surgery. The identification of frail patients before major surgery can help manage postoperative expectations and optimize transitions of care.

Arteriovenous (AV) fistulas are the preferred hemodialysis access for patients with end-stage renal disease, although multiple interventions are typically needed to maintain patency. When AV fistulas thrombose, however, there is debate as to whether open thrombectomy should be attempted, particularly for salvage of upper arm fistulas. This study was designed to evaluate outcomes after open thrombectomy of upper arm and forearm AV fistulas compared with AV grafts.We identified all patients who underwent an open thrombectomy procedure for a thrombosed AV fistula or graft at a single academic medical center between January 2006 and March 2017. The specific type of AV fistula or graft was evaluated, as were the patients' demographics, comorbidities, medications, adjunctive procedures during thrombectomy, and secondary interventions. The primary outcome measures, postintervention primary patency and postintervention secondary patency, were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models for risk adjustment.During the study period, 209 open thrombectomy procedures were performed in 139 patients; 73 (35%) were undertaken in AV fistulas and 136 (65%) in grafts. Patients with upper arm fistulas (n = 52; 54% brachiocephalic, 46% brachiobasilic) and forearm fistulas (n = 16) were more likely to be male but less likely to have cerebrovascular disease or ischemic heart disease and to be receiving anticoagulation therapy compared with graft patients. After thrombectomy, the majority of patients underwent dialysis successfully (70% upper arm fistulas, 56% forearm fistulas, 63% grafts; P.05), and 1-year survival rates were similar in all three cohorts. Postintervention primary patency at 1 year was significantly higher for AV fistulas vs grafts (33% for upper arm fistulas and 25% for forearm fistulas vs 9% for grafts; P .05), which was confirmed in multivariate analysis, where upper arm AV fistulas had a 46% lower risk of recurrent thrombosis or secondary intervention (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.85; P .05). Postintervention secondary patency at 1 year was similar between AV fistulas and grafts (44% for upper arm fistulas vs 43% for forearm fistulas vs 31% for grafts; P = .16), but in multivariate analysis, upper arm fistulas were significantly less likely to fail (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.00; P = .05).Our data suggest that AV fistula thrombectomy is successful in up to 70% of cases, with significantly improved risk-adjusted 1-year primary and secondary patency rates for upper arm fistulas compared with grafts. Whereas the risk of access failure is high after thrombectomy, efforts to salvage upper arm AV fistulas are effective in most patients and should be undertaken when feasible.

Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandates scheduled didactics for residency programs but allows flexibility in implementation. Work-hour restrictions, patient care duties, and operative schedules create barriers to attendance for surgical trainees. We explored vascular surgery trainees and faculty perceptions on trainees operative preparation and participation, and overall fund of knowledge after implementing an academic half day conference (AHD) schedule. Methods The vascular surgery conference at a single academic institution was changed from three 1-hour conferences weekly, to a single protected, 3-hour conference once weekly. Faculty and trainees were surveyed before and 5 months after implementing the new AHD schedule. Results Overall satisfaction improved after initiating the AHD (4 of 4 trainees, 3 of 4 faculty). All trainees (n = 4) and faculty (n = 4) believed the AHD conference format was worthwhile. Most trainees believed the AHD format improved their Vascular Surgery in Service Training Exam preparation (3 of 4), fund of knowledge (4 of 4), and operative preparation (3 of 4). More trainees than faculty tended to feel that the AHD interfered with operative participation (3 of 4 trainees vs 1 of 4 faculty). Neither group agreed that the conference was optimally scheduled. Conclusion This single-institution, pilot study suggests a positive association in the attitudes of most vascular surgery trainees and faculty regarding preparation for the Vascular Surgery In-Training Exam and overall fund of knowledge after implementing a protected AHD schedule. Further research is needed to understand the impact of the AHD conference on operative experience and training exam scores.

Frailty assessment can help vascular surgeons predict perioperative risk and long-term mortality for their patients. Unfortunately, comprehensive frailty assessments take too long to integrate into clinic workflow. This study was designed to evaluate 2 rapid methods for assessing frailty during vascular clinics-a short patient-reported survey and a provider-reported frailty scale.We prospectively enrolled 159 patients presenting to an academic medical center vascular surgery clinic between May and November 2016. Patients underwent frailty assessment using 2 rapid methods: (1) the Frail Nondisabled (FiND) survey (5 questions) and (2) the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS; 9-point scale from robust to severely frail). These were followed by administering the Fried Index, a validated frailty assessment method with 5 measures (weight loss, exhaustion, grip strength, walking speed, and activity level). The correlation between Fried scores (reference standard) with frailty diagnoses derived from FiND and CFS was analyzed using the Spearman-rank test, Cohen's kappa, sensitivity/specificity tests, and receiver operating curves.The evaluated cohort included 87 (55%) females, a mean age of 61 years, 126 (79%) preoperative patients, and 32 (20%) categorized as frail using the Fried Index criteria. The FiND survey was very sensitive (91%) but less specific for diagnosing frailty. In comparison, the CFS was highly specific (96%) for diagnosing frailty and exhibited high inter-rater reliability between surgeon and medical assistant scores (kappa: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.72-0.87; P 0.001). There was moderate correlation between frailty assigned using the Fried Index and the CFS (rho: 0.41-0.44).Frailty can be quickly and effectively assessed during vascular surgery clinic using a combination of patient-reported (FiND) and provider-reported (CFS) methods to improve diagnostic accuracy. Implementing routine frailty assessment into clinic workflow can be a valuable tool for risk prediction and surgical decision-making.

The optimization of surgical care for traumatic vascular injuries has come under scrutiny. Important questions regarding the impact of endovascular techniques, as well as residency and fellowship training paradigms on the preparedness of acute care, trauma and vascular surgeons have been raised. Inter-specialty collaboration is critical to address these issues.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the cancelling of in-person testing across the country We sought to understand the feasibility of conducting virtual oral examinations as well as opinions of vascular surgery program directors regarding the use of virtual platforms to conduct both mock and the “real” virtual certifying examinations(CE) Methods: Forty-four senior vascular trainees from 17 institutions took part in a virtual mock oral examination conducted by 38 practicing vascular surgeons via zoom Each examination lasted 30 minutes with four clinical scenarios An anonymous survey pertaining to conduct of the examination and opinions on feasibility of using virtual examinations for the vascular surgery CE was sent to all examiners and examinees A similar survey was sent to all vascular surgery program directors (PD) Results: Overall pass rate was 82% with no correlation with training paradigm 32/44 (73%) of trainees, 29/38 (76%) of examiners and 49/103 (48%) PD completed the surveys All groups thought the experience was (would be) beneficial (Table) While the majority of trainees and examiners believed they were able to communicate and express (or evaluate) knowledge and confidence as easily virtually as in person, PD were less likely to agree confidence could be assessed virtually The majority of respondents thought the certifying examination of the Vascular Surgery Board could be offered virtually, although no groups thought virtual exams were superior to in person examinations While cost benefit was perceived in virtual examinations, security of examination was a concern Conclusions: Performing virtual mock oral examinations for vascular trainees is feasible Both vascular surgery trainees as well as program directors feel that virtual certifying examinations should be considered by the Vascular Surgery Board [Formula presented]