Search

BackgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and associated social, economic, and clinical disruption have been widely speculated to affect pregnancy decision-making and outcomes. While a few US-based studies have examined subnational changes in fertility, preterm birth, and stillbirth, there remains limited knowledge of how the pandemic impacted childbearing and a broader set of perinatal health indicators at the national-level throughout 2020. Here, we use recently released national-level data to fill this gap. Importantly, we, unlike earlier work, use time-series methods to account for strong temporal patterning (e.g., seasonality, trend) that could otherwise lead to spurious findings.MethodsFor the years 2015 to 2020, we obtained national monthly counts of births and rates (per 100 births) for six perinatal indicators: preterm birth (ResultsFor total births as well as five of the six indicators (i.e., all but the rate of cesarean delivery), observed values fall well below expected levels (pDiscussionOur findings provide some of the first national evidence of substantial reductions in live births and adverse perinatal outcomes during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Only cesarean delivery appeared unaffected. These declines were not uniform across the pandemic, suggesting that several mechanisms, which require further study, may explain these patterns.

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of preventive measures on the risk of being bitten by a tick and of suffering from borreliosis in children attending so-called 'forest kindergartens' (nurseries located in forested areas where children spend all-season full-time outdoors), compared to children attending regular kindergartens. In addition, we aimed to analyse sources of information and the risk of being bitten more than once. Methods: 53 kindergartens (25 forest kindergartens, 28 regular kindergartens) in the state of Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany participated in this study and protective parental behaviour was recorded. In a prospective cohort study, the numbers of tick bites and cases of borreliosis were recorded monthly (March to October 2004) using a questionnaire. The influence of preventive measures was estimated using multivariate log-binomial regression. Results: Altogether, 1707 children of'forest kindergartens' (506 children) and regular kindergartens (1201 children) were included. Parental protective behaviour was significantly better in forest kindergartens compared to regular kindergartens. There were no substantial differences between effect estimates after stratification for parental protective behaviour. For children attending a 'forest kindergarten, the adjusted risk ratio of being tick bitten was 2.6 (3.3-3.0) which was only slightly different from the unadjusted risk, ratio. Conclusion: Although protective parental behaviour in 'forest kindergarten' children was significantly better compared to regular kindergarten, children in forest kindergartens are at a considerable risk of tick bites and borreliosis. Implementing effective preventive measures against borreliosis represents a public health challenge.

The Working Group III (WGIII) contribution to the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) assesses literature on the scientific, technological, environmental, economic and social aspects of mitigation of climate change. It builds upon the WGIII contribution to the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), the Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (SRREN) and previous reports and incorporates subsequent new findings and research. Throughout, the focus is on the implications of its findings for policy, without being prescriptive about the particular policies that governments and other important participants in the policy process should adopt. In light of the IPCC's mandate, authors in WGIII were guided by several principles when assembling this assessment: (1) to be explicit about mitigation options, (2) to be explicit about their costs and about their risks and opportunities vis-a-vis other development priorities, (3) and to be explicit about the underlying criteria, concepts, and methods for evaluating alternative policies. This summary offers the main findings of the report.

The Working Group III contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (WGIII AR5) provides a comprehensive assessment of all relevant options for mitigating climate change through limiting or preventing greenhouse gas emissions, as well as activities that remove them from the atmosphere. It draws on scientific literature accepted for publication prior to 4 October 2013. The WGIII Summary for Policymakers was approved at the Twelfth Session of Working Group III, held in Berlin, Germany, from 7 to 11 April, 2014. During the session, the IPCC plenary also accepted the underlying scientific and technical assessment, which stands at 2000 pages, including more than 700 pages of references.