Search

With the aging of the hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patient cohort and the availability of highly effective and tolerable treatment regimens, an increasing number of elderly patients are now eligible for HCV therapy. This study investigated clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of elderly HCV-infected patients as well as the effectiveness and safety of available therapies. Patients were enrolled into the German Hepatitis C Registry (DHC-R), a prospective, multicenter, real-world cohort study. Patients were treated at the discretion of the physician, and data were collected by a web-based system. Of 7133 patients who initiated treatment, 686 (9.6%) were > 70 years of age. In patients > 70 years, intent-to-treat (ITT) SVR12 was 92.6% (514/555) compared to 90.7% (4521/4985) in patients ≤ 70 years of age. Overall, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 374 (54.5%) and 3435 patients (53.3%) > 70 or ≤ 70 years of age; 7.6% (52) and 3.6% (235) in the respective age groups had a serious AE. Twenty-two (3.2%) and 62 (1.0%) of the patients > 70 or ≤ 70 years discontinued treatment due to AEs. Death was reported in 34 patients, of whom eight were > 70 years of age. Frequent comorbidities in patients > 70 years of age were cardiac disease, renal disease and diabetes. Psychiatric disorders, substance abuse and viral co-infection were more frequent in younger patients. Direct-acting antiviral therapies were well tolerated in patients older than 70 years. SVR12 rates in the elderly patient group were similar to those observed in younger patients. Differences in the prevalence of comorbidities between age groups warrant individualized attention with respect to drug–drug interactions and therapy adherence. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00009717.

Background: Accurate assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic HBeAg-negative Hepatitis B is of crucial importance not only to predict the long-term clinical course, but also to evaluate antiviral therapy indication. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the utility of point shear wave elastography (pSWE) for longitudinal non-invasive fibrosis assessment in a large cohort of untreated patients with chronic HBeAg-negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Methods: 407 consecutive patients with HBeAg-negative HBV infection who underwent pSWE, transient elastography (TE) as well as laboratory fibrosis markers, including fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4), aspartate to platelet ratio index (APRI) and FibroTest, on the same day were prospectively followed up for six years. Patients were classified into one of the three groups: inactive carriers (IC, HBV-DNA &lt, 2000 IU/mL and ALT &lt, 40 U/L), grey zone group 1 (GZ-1, HBV DNA &lt, 2000 IU/mL and ALT &gt, grey zone group 2 (GZ-2, HBV-DNA &gt, 40 U/L). Results: pSWE results were significantly correlated with TE (r = 0.29, p &lt, 0.001) and APRI (r = 0.17, p = 0.005). Median pSWE values did not differ between IC, GZ-1 and GZ-2 patients (p = 0.82, p = 0.17, p = 0.34). During six years of follow-up, median pSWE and TE values did not differ significantly over time (TE: p = 0.27, pSWE: p = 0.05). Conclusion: Our data indicate that pSWE could be useful for non-invasive fibrosis assessment and follow-up in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection.

Supplemental material, DHCR_OST-Cannabis_Alcohol_supplementary_2018-10-30_xyz151015746ed84_3-converted for Alcohol and Cannabis Consumption Does Not Diminish Cure Rates in a Real-World Cohort of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infected Patients on Opioid Substitution Therapy—Data From the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R) by Stefan Christensen, Peter Buggisch, Stefan Mauss, Klaus HW Böker, Tobias Müller, Hartwig Klinker, Tim Zimmermann, Yvonne Serfert, Bernd Weber, Jens Reimer and Heiner Wedemeyer in Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment

Results (liver disease evolution) Description of data: Hepatic disease progression was assessed as a secondary objective in this study with optional data collection, and the limited data available are displayed in this additional file. (DOCX 17Â kb)

Table S1. Week-4 JNJ-56914845 pharmacokinetic parameters after administration in Panel 4. (DOCX 14 kb)

Further information on the methods of the study, including dosing rationale and protocol deviations are included. In addition, further virologic resistance testing and safety results are included. (DOCX 16 kb)

Figure S1. Mean (SD) plasma concentration versus time profile for: (a) simeprevir; (b) TMC647055; and (c) ritonavir in Panels 1â 4; and for (d) JNJ-56914845 in Panel 4. RBV ribavirin, RTV ritonavir, SD standard deviation, SMV simeprevir. (DOCX 564 kb)

Table S3. Week-4 TMC647055 pharmacokinetic parameters after administration in (a) Panels 1â 3 and (b) Panel 4. (DOCX 15 kb)

Table S4. Week-4 ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters after administration in (a) Panels 1â 3 and (b) Panel 4. (DOCX 15 kb)

Background & Aims: We investigated the efficacy and safety of simeprevir plus daclatasvir in treatment-naïve patients with chronic, genotype 1b hepatitis C virus infection and advanced liver disease, excluding patients with pre-defined NS5A resistance-associated substitutions. Methods: This phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicentre study included patients aged≥18years with advanced fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis (METAVIR F3/4). Patients with NS5A-Y93H or L31M/V resistance-associated substitutions at screening were excluded. Simeprevir (150mg)+daclatasvir (60mg) once daily was administered for 12 or 24weeks; treatment could be extended to 24 weeks prior to or at the Week 12 visit. Primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response 12weeks after the end of treatment. Results: A total of 106 patients were treated; 27% patients were aged >65years, 39% had cirrhosis, 53% had estimated glomerular filtration rate 30-89mL/min, 14% had diabetes, and 38% had arterial hypertension. Overall, 42/106 received 12weeks of treatment and 64/106 received 24weeks of treatment. Ninety-seven (92%) patients achieved a sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment. The reasons for failure were viral breakthrough (n=7) at weeks 4-16, early treatment discontinuation (n=1) and viral relapse (n=1). Seventy-four (70%) patients had ≥1 adverse event during treatment, including six (6%) patients with ≥1 serious adverse event. Three (3%) patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse events. Conclusions: Simeprevir+daclatasvir demonstrated strong antiviral activity and was well-tolerated in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection, advanced liver disease and a high prevalence of comorbidities. However, viral breakthrough occurred in seven patients, making this regimen unsatisfactory.