1. Predictors of success for Brugada syndrome epicardial ablation
- Author
-
Francesca Bianchi, A. Sibona Masi, Giuseppe Musumeci, Alessandro Blandino, Stefano Grossi, and C Pintor
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Internal medicine ,Epicardial ablation ,Cardiology ,medicine ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,medicine.disease ,business ,Brugada syndrome - Abstract
Epicardial right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) ablation has been described for the treatement of Brugada syndrome (BrS) high risk patients. Purpose Success evaluation of epicardial ablation for BrS. Methods Type 1 ECG was defined as spontaneous if recorded in absence of drugs and/or specific conditions. BrS patients were scheduled for ablation if presented at least one of: spontaneous type 1 ECG, syncope, ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Programmed electrical stimulation (PES) was performed (2 extrastimuli, 2 sites) in basal conditions and after ajmaline infusion. Epicardial subxifoid access and electroanatomical endo-epicardial maps were obtained during sinus rhythm. Delayed fragmented/low-frequency, low-voltage electrograms (EGM) were targeted: substrate area measured in basal conditions and after ajmaline. Epicardial ablation Radiofrequency (RF) was delivered (50 W power control mode) till complete elimination of targeted EGM and BrS-ECG pattern after ajmaline. Eventually PES repeated: if positive a repeated PES scheduled at follow-up (fu). Success was defined as absence of type 1 ECG either spontaneous or with ajmaline challenge at 3 month. Recurrences were scheduled to redo ablation. Results 55 patients were submitted to 58 ablation procedures. 38 spontaneous type 1 ECG: 18 symptomatic for syncope/polimorphic VT/VF or appropriate ICD shock; 13 had VA induction at PES. 4 patients with ajmaline-type 1 ECG had VA induction. 36% of the symptomatic patients and 26% of asymptomatic had PES-VA induction. In all patients abnormal EGM area (cm2) was detected in epicardial RVOT (table 1). Acute success: No patient had ECG type 1 with ajmaline. 5 patients had PES induction of VA. Complications: 1 cardiac tamponade, 16 mild pericarditis. At FU of 1,1±0,6 yrs no patient had spontaneous ECG type 1 nor arrhythmic events. 50 had negative ajmaline challenge (90% success rate after single procedure), 3 underwent redo: 2 had negative ajmaline challenge at FU, 1 had persistence type 1-ajmaline induction; 2 are scheduled for redo. No patient had VT induction at PES. Multivariate analysis: Single procedure success was not related either to history (symptoms, VA, type 1 ECG) or to procedural findings (PES results, substrate area). Conclusion Epicardial substrate ablation was safe end effective in BrS. No clinical or procedural findings were related to success Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF