Search

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous systemic autoimmune disease with distinct subsets identified by specific autoantibodies. Some environmental agents might play a role in SSc pathogenesis, including silicone breast implants (SBI). This association has been controversial in previous literature and only few studies reported the auto-antibody status in these SSc women. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of SBI with SSc in a large cohort of Italian patients, classified according to their SSc-related autoantibodies and to their history of breast cancer.Three Italian referral centres retrospectively collected clinical and laboratory data of consecutive SSc women, that were included when fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria and when SSc specific auto-antibodies status was available (anti-centromere (ACA), anti-Topoisomerase I (anti-Topo I) and anti-RNA Polymerase III antibodies (anti-RNAP3)). Data regarding history of SBI, SBI rupture and breast cancer were recorded.Among 742 SSc women, a history of SBI was recorded in 12 patients (1.6%); in only 1 case the implantation occurred after SSc diagnosis. In SSc patients with anti- RNAP3+ a significantly higher frequency of SBI rupture and SBI rupture without breast cancer were observed, as compared to anti-RNAP3-negative patients. No association was noted for SBI without rupture.In this study we demonstrated a link between SBI rupture and induction of anti-RNAP3+ SSc; further studies are needed to better define the characteristics of this syndrome and the possible effects of SBI removal and immunosuppressive treatment.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate or severe disease activity. We analyzed data from the Italian biologics register Gruppo Italiano Studio Early Arthritides (GISEA) to investigate the rate of disease remission and functional improvement, based on the 28-Joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and the (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score in RA patients with moderate or severe disease activity beginning etanercept therapy. Disease was defined as severe (H-RA) with DAS28 ≥5.1 and moderate (M-RA) with DAS28 ≥3.2 to 5.1 at baseline. Patients were considered in remission if DAS28 was ≤2.6, and HAQ ≤0.5 defined normal function. We enrolled 953 RA patients, 320 with M-RA and 633 H-RA. Age and disease duration were similar in the two cohorts, but H-RA patients had significantly more comorbidities (p < 0.01) and took significantly more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (p < 0.001) than M-RA patients. After 1 year, the percentage of patients achieving disease remission and normal function (DAS28 ≤2.6 plus HAQ ≤0.5) was higher in M-RA (21.4 %) than in H-RA patients (14.8 %, p = 0.007), regardless of the disease duration. Additionally, female gender (p = 0.006) and H-RA class (p = 0.002) negatively predicted disease remission at 1 year. However, the drug survival rate did not differ between the two subsets. This study confirms that etanercept was effective in the treatment of active RA, but best response, in terms of disease remission and normal function ability, was greater and easier to attain in M-RA patients. These findings may aid clinicians to choose the best strategy to treat RA.

Introduction Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in association with methotrexate (MTX). Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX–MTX combination therapy compared with RTX alone in the treatment of RA. Methods We analyzed data from a prospective cohort study, the Italian biologic register GISEA, to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab. Moreover, the adverse events (AE) and the causes of discontinuation therapy were analyzed. Results We identified 338 RA patients, 162 treated with RTX and 176 with RTX–MTX. After 52 and 104 weeks of therapy the disease activity score in 28 joints and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Score were available in 168 patients (78 with RTX–MTX and 60 with RTX alone), showing significant reduction without differences among the two groups. AE were reported in 142 patients (42%), for a total of 368 recorded side effects. The majority (90.5%) of AE were mild to moderate in severity. Comparable percentages of severe AE were reported in the 2 groups (9.9% for RTX alone and 9.3% for RTX + MTX). A poor disease control was observed in 14.2% and 13.5% of patients treated with RTX + MTX and RTX, respectively; while 12 patients (4.5% in RTX + MTX, and 2.5% in RTX group) suspended therapy for AE. Conclusions RTX showed a good efficacy and safety profile in the real-life management of RA patients regardless of the association with MTX.