1. Impact of Surgical Margin Width and Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy on Long-Term Outcomes for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
- Author
-
Chen Yifan, Cheng Shi, Lin Lianku, Li Fuyu, Li Jingdong, Cheng Zhangjun, Zheng Yamin, Guo Wei, Zeng Yongyi, Wang Jianming, Wang Jian, Ding Lei, Bi Xinyu, Liu Hongzhi, Lin Ziguo, Zhou Weiping, Lou Jianying, Zheng Shuguo, and Huang Qizhen
- Subjects
Surgical margin ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Propensity score matching ,Adjuvant therapy ,Long term outcomes ,Medicine ,business ,Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ,Surgery - Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to investigate the survival outcomes of surgical margin width in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), and evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy (p-AT) in ICC patients underwent narrow-margin hepatectomy (NMH).METHODS Between November 2011 and August 2017, patients who underwent hepatectomy for ICC were collected from 13 major hepatopancreatobiliary centers in China. The survival outcomes for patients who underwent wide margin hepatectomy (WMH) were compared with those who underwent NMH using the 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). For patients who underwent NMH, the relationship between p-AT and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. RESULTS Among 478 included patients, 195(40.8%) underwent WMH whereas 283(59.2%) underwent NMH. PSM yielded 79 matched patients with similar baseline characteristics. Patients underwent WMH had a significant better OS and DFS compared with those underwent NMH (before PSM: Median OS 27 vs. 17 months, P 0.05; Stage III: OS, DFS, P >0.05). For patient underwent NMH, p-AT following NMH showed a better OS and RFS when compared to those who underwent NMH alone (OS, P = 0.05; DFS, p
- Published
- 2020