Search

Aims Lung congestion in patients with heart failure (HF) has traditionally been treated using interventions that reduce pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure. The transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) channel regulates fluid transit across the pulmonary capillary-interface, and represents a novel target to reduce lung water, independent of pulmonary capillary hypertension. This pilot study examined the safety and potential efficacy of TRPV4 blockade as a novel treatment for HF. Methods and results In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover pilot trial, 11 subjects with chronic, compensated HF were treated with a novel TRPV4 antagonist (GSK2798745) or placebo. The primary endpoint was lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO ) after 7 days of treatment with GSK2798745 as compared to placebo. Secondary endpoints included additional diffusion parameters, spirometry and safety assessments. Compared to placebo, treatment with GSK2798745 resulted in a trend to improvement in DLCO (placebo: -0.336 mL/mmHg/min; GSK2798745: +0.458 mL/mmHg/min; treatment difference: +0.793 mL/mmHg/min; 95% confidence interval: -0.925 to 2.512) that was not statistically significant. GSK2798745 was well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. Conclusion In this pilot trial, GSK2798745 was found to be safe and well-tolerated, with a trend toward improved gas transfer. Further investigation is warranted in larger studies to determine whether treatment with TRPV4 antagonists or alternative treatments targeting capillary permeability might be effective to improve lung congestion, pulmonary gas transfer and clinical status in patients with acute or chronic HF.

Daprodustat, a small-molecule inhibitor of prolyl hydroxylases, prevents breakdown of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), leading to increased transcription of HIF-responsive genes. This randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a topical formulation of daprodustat in healthy volunteers (intact skin) and in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) following single and/or 14-day repeat-dose administration. In the diabetic patients, exploratory assessments of wound area, volume, and depth were made to qualitatively assess effectiveness. Systemic absorption via topical application was limited across doses up to 1.0% at 100 mg/cm2 for 14 days. Systemic pharmacokinetics were quantifiable in a few samples from a few patients. Because only sporadic concentrations were observed versus pharmacokinetic profiles, pharmacokinetic parameters were not determined. Wound area, depth, and volume showed consistent but weak improvements in the treatment arm; however, the variability in response and small sample size of the standard-of-care and placebo arms limited the ability to assess trends in wound healing compared with the daprodustat arm. Overall, topically applied daprodustat was well tolerated, raised no safety concerns, and provided limited to nonquantifiable systemic exposures. The healing of DFUs will need to be evaluated in studies designed to test this hypothesis over a longer treatment duration.