Search

INTRODUCTION: Spasticity is a medical problem with a high incidence that significantly impact on the quality of life of patients and their families. AIM: To analyze and to answer different questions about the use of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) in our clinical practice. DEVELOPMENT: A group of experts in neurology develop a list of topics related with the use of BTA. Two big groups were considered: spasticity in adults and in children with cerebral palsy. A literature search at PubMed for English, French, and Spanish language articles published up to June 2016 was performed. The manuscript was structured as a questionnaire that includes those questions that, according to the panel opinion, could generate more controversy or doubt. The initial draft was reviewed by the expert panel members to allow for modifications, and after subsequent revisions for achieving the highest degree of consensus, the final text was then validated. Different questions about diverse aspects of spasticity in adults, such as methods for evaluating spasticity, infiltration techniques, doses, number of infiltration points, etc. Regarding spasticity in children with cerebral palsy, the document included questions about minimum age of infiltration, methods of analgesia, etc. CONCLUSIONS: This review is a tool for continuous training for neurologist and rehabilitation specialist and residents of both specialties, about different specific areas of the management of BTA.

Concentrations of soluble CD44 standard (sCD44std) and CD44 variant 6 (sCD44v6) isoforms were determined in the sera of 59 patients with distant metastasis from breast cancer receiving second line hormone- or chemotherapy, in comparison to 46 breast cancer patients without detectable recurrent disease and 21 healthy blood donors. The sera of non-metastatic breast cancer, patients contained sCD44std and sCD44v6 concentrations similiar to those of healthy blood donors. In sera of patients with distant metastasis from recurrent breast cancer the median values of sCD44std and sCD44v6 were significantly higher (sCD44std: 502 ng/ml, p=0.03; sCD44v6: 193 ng/ml, p = 0.002) in comparison to healthy blood donors and patients with non-metastatic disease (p0.001 for both parameters). A significant correlation was observed between sCD44v6 serum concentrations and the number of metastasized organs (p=0.0018), serum LDH concentrations (p0.0001), tumor grading (p=0.025) and the presence of hepatic metastasis (p=0.028). Furthermore, sCD44v6 expression was associated with the patient's responsiveness to second line hormone- or chemotherapy. Non-responders had significantly higher sCD44v6 levels compared with the responder group (median: 447 ng/ml vs 171 ng/ml; p=0.0007). Logistic regression analysis indicated that sCD44v6 serum levels above 250 ng/ml (p =0.033) and the presence of hepatic metastasis (p=0.009) were independent factors predicting an unfavourable response to therapy.