Search

Glycopyrronium (GLY) is a pharmacological maintenance treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, its effectiveness and tolerability for COPD patients in routine clinical practice have not been well-investigated. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of GLY on health-related quality of life and its safety in patients with COPD in a routine clinical care setting. This multi-center, prospective, six-month observational study recruited patients diagnosed with COPD and treated with GLY at three medical centers in central Taiwan. The full analysis set (n = 102) had a significant improvement in the Clinical COPD Questionnaire total (mean ± SD = −0.39 ± 0.90, p = 0.002), symptoms (mean ± SD = −0.61 ± 0.90, p < 0.001) and mental state scores (mean ± SD = −0.54 ± 1.72, p = 0.021) but not the functional state score (mean ± SD = −0.10 ± 1.15, p = 0.529). During the observational period, 58 patients (52.73%) experienced adverse events; only one adverse event (dizziness) was suspected to be related to the study drug. Three patients (2.73%) discontinued the study and GLY treatment because of an adverse event. One patient (0.91%) died during the study period because of a cerebral infarction, which was judged to be not associated with GLY treatment. In conclusion, GLY could be effective in improving the health status and is safe for patients with COPD in a real-life setting.

Background Patients with COPD need to cope with a disabling disease, which leads to health status impairment. Aim To investigate the long term change of health status in subjects with mild to moderate airflow obstruction and to compare this to subjects without airflow obstruction, with and without a smoking history. Second, to investigate the factors potentially associated to rapid health status decline in our total cohort. Methods Two hundred and one subjects were included. Generic [Short form 36 health survey (SF36) and EuroQol - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D)] and disease specific [Clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT)] health status questionnaires were regularly repeated over a six years period. Other functional outcomes comprised measures of lung function, physical fitness, physical activity and emotional state. Results On average, health status decline did not differ between groups with the exception of the EQ-5D index, which deteriorated faster in subjects with airflow obstruction compared to the never smoking control group [− 0.018(0.008) versus 0.00006(0.003), p = 0.03]. Subjects presenting at least one exacerbation had faster rate of deterioration measured with CAT [0.91(0.21) versus − 0.26(0.25), p

Objectives Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) are used as fixed numbers in the interpretation of clinical trials. Little is known about its dynamics. This study aims to explore the impact of baseline score, study setting, and patient characteristics on health status MCIDs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Study Design and Setting Baseline and follow-up data on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were retrospectively analyzed from pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and routine clinical practice (RCP). Anchor- and distribution-based MCID estimates were calculated and tested between settings, gender, age, Global initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification, comorbidities, and baseline health status. Results In total, 658 patients were included with 2,299 change score measurements. MCID estimates for improvement and deterioration ranged for all subgroups 0.50–6.30 (CAT), 0.10–0.84 (CCQ), and 0.33–12.86 (SGRQ). Larger MCID estimates for improvement and smaller ones for deterioration were noted in patients with worse baseline health status, females, elderly, GOLD I/II patients, and patients with less comorbidities. Estimates from PR were larger. Conclusion Baseline health status and setting affected MCID estimates of COPD health status questionnaires. Patterns were observed for gender, age, spirometry classification, and comorbidity levels. These outcomes would advocate the need for tailored MCIDs.

Introduction Anxiety and depression are important but often under-diagnosed co-morbid conditions in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) which may affect the functional capacity of the patients. Aim To find out the proportion of depression and anxiety among stable COPD patients using a validated questionnaire suitable for use in clinic and the factors affecting their reduced functional capability as assessed by six-minute walk test. Materials and methods This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. Seventy five patients diagnosed with stable COPD in outpatient Department of Pulmonary Medicine in a tertiary care hospital, satisfying all inclusion criteria, were included in the study. They were examined clinically, categorized as per Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) severity assessment guideline and interviewed by designated interviewer using validated questionnaire for depression (Hamilton depression rating scale, HAM-D) and anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI). The functional exercise capacity of the patient was assessed by six-minute walk test. Statistical analysis was performed using Minitab software (version16.1). Results Among 75 stable COPD patients (68 male, 7 female), majority (32 out of 75) had both depression and anxiety, while only anxiety or depression was present in 9 each. The patients with depression had no significant difference in six-minute walk distance, change in heart rate and respiratory rate (p = 0.4186, 0.219 and 0.41 respectively) as compared to those without depression, but were found to be more dyspnoeic at the end of the test (p= 0.003). There was also no significant difference in walk distance in patients with high STAI score as compared to those with low STAI score (p= 0.276). Conclusion Both anxiety and depression were present in majority of the stable COPD patients. The presence of these co-morbid conditions had no significant effect on the functional status of the patients in the form of reduced six-minute walk distance, though they were more symptomatic than those without these co-morbidities.

The clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) has been developed to measure the health status of COPD patients. The aim of this study was to translate CCQ into the Persian language and assess the validity and reliability of the translated version. We used a forward-backward procedure to translate the questionnaire. In a cross-sectional study 100 COPD patients and 50 healthy subjects over 40 years old were selected to assess the reliability and construct validity of the instrument. The face and content validity were used for the questionnaire validity. Validity was examined in a population of patients with COPD, using the Persian validated version of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (PSGRQ). In order to assess the questionnaire’s reliability, the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha were calculated. Test-retest reliability was tested by re-administering the Persian version of the CCQ (PCCQ) after 1 week. Test-retest carry out of data demonstrates that the PCCQ has excellent reliability (ICC for all 3 domains were higher than 0.9). Internal consistency was found by Cronbach’s alpha to be 0.96, 0.94, 0.97, and 0.98 for the symptom, mental state, functional state and total scores respectively. In addition, the correlation between the components of PCCQ and PSGRQ showed satisfactory construct validity. Analyzing the data from healthy subjects and patients divulged that the PCCQ has acceptable discriminant validity. In general, the PCCQ had satisfactory reliability and validity for assessing health-related quality of life status of Iranian COPD patients.

Background: COPD is a major public health problem. Health status has become an important tool in its diagnostics and management with CCQ, CAT and SGRQ as the main instruments. Important is to what extent a change in its score is clinically relevant. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) defines this. Current MCIDs are 0.4 (CCQ), 2.0 (CAT) and 4.0 (SGRQ). This study investigated the MCID of these tools using multiple approaches, since existing evidence is limited. Methods: In total 316 patients participated in a 3-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme (63% male, 51%FEV1pred., 41 mean packyears, 58 years mean age, 2/50/38/10% GOLD stage I/II/III/IV). Anchor-based approaches, including patient-referencing, criterion-referencing and questionnaire-referencing, and the distribution-based methods SEM and 0.5SD were used to determine the MCID. Results: Discussion: This study showed that the MCID of a tool might differ depending on which method is used. Estimates ranged from 0.30 to 0.51 for CCQ, from 2.17 to 3.50 for CAT and from 6.17 to 7.92 for SGRQ. The current published MCID of the CCQ fits well in this range, however the MCID of the CAT and SGRQ in the literature is below the range found. (Table Presented).