Search

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-gpi-10.1177_13684302221079220 for Remembrance of contact past: When intergroup contact metacognitions decrease outgroup tolerance by Lisbeth Drury, Mich��le D. Birtel, Georgina Randsley de Moura and Richard J. Crisp in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-jcc-10.1177_00220221211065108 for Perceptions of Emotional Functionality: Similarities and Differences Among Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultures by Angela T. Maitner, Jamie DeCoster, Per A. Andersson, Kimmo Eriksson, Sara Sherbaji, Roger Giner-Sorolla, Diane M. Mackie, Mark Aveyard, Heather M. Claypool, Richard J. Crisp, Vladimir Gritskov, Kristina Habjan, Andree Hartanto, Toko Kiyonari, Anna O. Kuzminska, Zoi Manesi, Catherine Molho, Anudhi Munasinghe, Leonard S. Peperkoorn, Victor Shiramizu, Rachel Smallman, Natalia Soboleva, Adam W. Stivers, Amy Summerville, Baopei Wu and Junhui Wu in Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-jcc-10.1177_00220221211065108 for Perceptions of Emotional Functionality: Similarities and Differences Among Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultures by Angela T. Maitner, Jamie DeCoster, Per A. Andersson, Kimmo Eriksson, Sara Sherbaji, Roger Giner-Sorolla, Diane M. Mackie, Mark Aveyard, Heather M. Claypool, Richard J. Crisp, Vladimir Gritskov, Kristina Habjan, Andree Hartanto, Toko Kiyonari, Anna O. Kuzminska, Zoi Manesi, Catherine Molho, Anudhi Munasinghe, Leonard S. Peperkoorn, Victor Shiramizu, Rachel Smallman, Natalia Soboleva, Adam W. Stivers, Amy Summerville, Baopei Wu and Junhui Wu in Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-gpi-10.1177_13684302221079220 for Remembrance of contact past: When intergroup contact metacognitions decrease outgroup tolerance by Lisbeth Drury, Mich��le D. Birtel, Georgina Randsley de Moura and Richard J. Crisp in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Previous theorizing and research has linked exposure to counter-stereotypical diversity (e.g., an Oxford-educated bricklayer) to enhanced cognitive performance and creativity. However, it is unclear whether people’s motivation to cognitively engage with the counter-stereotypical information (i.e., need for cognition [NFC]) influences this effect. Across three experiments ( N = 887) we found consistent support for the idea that exposure to counter-stereotypes (CSTs) promotes cognitive reflection for people low in NFC ( d+ = .34). In contrast, people high in NFC showed decreased cognitive reflection after being exposed to CSTs ( d+ = −.18), although the evidence for the latter effect was weak. These findings suggest that exposure to CSTs can promote cognitive reflection unless people have a strong desire to understand and predict outcomes and events, in which case exposure to CSTs may backfire. Taken together, we conclude that motivation to engage in cognitive activity may be an important consideration for research and interventions involving social and cultural diversity.

The European Union referendum result in England focused increasing political attention on 'left behind' places sidelined in the ‘post-regeneration’ (Matthews and O'Brien, 2015) era of 2010 onwards. This shift creates space for thinking anew about reviving and reconfiguring regeneration policies to address enduring forms of place-based disadvantage. To this end, this chapter takes a close look at the 'New' Labour approach to urban regeneration from 1997 to 2010 and what can be learned from it. It offers a new conceptual analysis of how the New Labour years were characterised by a tension between 'ameliorative' and 'transformative' policy logics; with valuable ameliorative outcomes around improving neighbourhood conditions eventually reassessed as failure through the lens of transformative objectives around wholesale economic regeneration. We conclude these tensions and contestations need to be acknowledged and resolved in less binary and divisive ways than in recent policy history within any new round of regeneration policy.

Supplemental material, Appendices-REVISED-August-2018 for Diversity may help the uninterested: Evidence that exposure to counter-stereotypes promotes cognitive reflection for people low (but not high) in need for cognition by Ekaterina Damer, Thomas L. Webb and Richard J. Crisp in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Previous theorizing and research has linked exposure to counter-stereotypical diversity (e.g., an Oxford-educated bricklayer) to enhanced cognitive performance and creativity. However, it is unclear to what extent people’s motivation to cognitively engage with the counter-stereotypical information (i.e., need for cognition, NFC) influences this effect. Across three experiments (N = 887) we found consistent support for the hypothesis that exposure to CSTs promotes cognitive reflection for people low in NFC (d+ = .36). In contrast, people high in NFC showed decreased cognitive reflection after being exposed to CSTs (d+ = -.21). This research suggests that a low level of cognitive motivation may be sufficient to enable cognitive reflection after exposure to CSTs. However, the findings also indicate that too much cognitive motivation can backfire. Taken together, we conclude that motivation to engage in cognitive activity may be an important consideration for research and interventions involving expectancy-violating diversity experiences.

The present research investigated linguistic description as a moderator of biased evaluations of counterstereotypical individuals. Members of an online participant pool (N = 237) indicated their liking for stereotypical and counterstereotypical individuals who were described using adjectives or behaviors. There was a significant interaction between target typicality and linguistic description: People liked counterstereotypical individuals more than stereotypical individuals when target individuals were described using adjectives. In contrast, they showed no bias or a negative bias against counterstereotypical individuals who were described using behaviors. This interaction effect generalized across gender targets (men/women) and sexuality targets (gay/straight), and it was partially mediated by subjective processing fluency. Implications for the backlash effect and prejudice reduction are discussed.

Prototypicality is an important factor for judgments and evaluations of group members and leadership selection. We tested whether these prototypicality perceptions vary as a function of individual differences in cognitive processing preferences. Participants’ need for a structured, stable environment was measured before we independently manipulated the group prototypicality of a leadership candidate. Results revealed that participants’ preference for prototypical leaders, and dislike for nonprototypical leaders, was accentuated for those who preferred structured, stable environments. Participants tolerant of less cognitive structure did not show this bias for prototypical leaders and against nonprototypical leaders. These findings suggest that individual differences in cognitive processing tendencies may moderate how group prototypicality is perceived and used, and can consequently affect the type of leaders people prefer.