Search

Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) can significantly alter the quality of life of adolescents. Some of the available questionnaires in French measuring the quality of life in this population show weak psychometric properties. The newly developed Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) questionnaire promises better properties.To provide a French-Canadian version of the ISYQOL and to verify its psychometric characteristics.Prospective validation of a cross-cultural adaptation of the ISYQOL questionnaire.A total of 111 participants with idiopathic scoliosis (77.5% female, 10-18 years old, mean Cobb angle=28°) were included in the study.The French-Canadian version of the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL-F) questionnaire.The ISYQOL was translated into French using a forward-backward approach. We then verified the understanding of the translated items with two scoliosis experts and 10 adolescents. Afterward, 111 adolescents with IS were recruited by convenience at the scoliosis clinic and they completed the ISYQOL on three occasions (before seeing the specialist, 1 week, and 2 weeks after). Cronbach's alpha, intra-class (ICC), and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to respectively determine internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity with the SRS-22r and SF-12. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and 95% confidence minimal detectable change (MDCThe ISYQOL-F showed good internal consistency with a Cronbach alpha of 0.81 and 0.85 respectively for items 1-13 (n=55; ISYQOL-F mean score ± SD = 63.9±13.5) and 1-20 (n=56; ISYQOL-F mean score ± SD=60.7±10.3). Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICCThe internal consistency and reliability of ISYQOL-F are good. The total score correlates moderately with the SRS-22r and SF-12. Unlike SRS-22r, the ISYQOL-F does not appear to have a ceiling effect. The ISYQOL-F may thus be suitable to assess quality of life in a population of French-Canadian adolescents with IS.

ObjectivesThis study aims to translate and cross-culturally adapt the standard version of the World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) EPHect Endometriosis Patient Questionnaire (EPQ) into Danish and to ensure equivalence of a Danish electronic version.MethodsThe translation, cultural adaption, and electronic migration followed recommendations from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) and the Critical Path Institute. Ten women with endometriosis were enrolled for cognitive debriefing of the paper version (pEPQ) after translation and back translation. The questionnaire was then migrated into an electronic version (eEPQ) and subsequently tested for usability and measurement equivalence by five women with endometriosis.ResultsCross-cultural alterations were needed for medical terms, response options for ethnicity, the educational system, and measurement units. Thirteen questions were altered after back translation, while 21 underwent minor changes after cognitive debriefing. After testing the eEPQ, 13 questions were altered. Questions tested for measurement equivalence across the two modes of administration were found comparable. The median time-to-complete the pEPQ and eEPQ was 62 min (range: 29–110) and 63 min (range: 31–88), respectively. General comments included the questionnaire being relevant but long and repetitive.ConclusionsWe find the the Danish pEPQ and eEPQ similar and comparable to the original English instrument. However, attention must be drawn to questions regarding measurement units, ethnicity, and educational systems before cross-country comparison. The Danish pEPQ and eEPQ are suitable for obtaining subjective data on women with endometriosis.

Objective/Background: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common but often underestimated in children. The gold standard for assessing SDB is polysomnography, but it is expensive and time-consuming. The Paediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ/SRDB) is a validated screening tool for SDB, which represents an efficient and alternative tool for screening SDB among children. However, a translated and validated Danish version of the PSQ/SRDB is not available yet. Our aim was to cross-culturally translate the PSQ/SRDB into Danish language for use in clinical and research settings. Patients/Methods: The translation was carried out through forward-backward translation techniques performed by a panel of experts, and the cross-cultural adaptation was achieved by pretesting of the pre-final version. Internal consistency of the Danish PSQ/SRDB version was measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficients, while Cohen’s kappa was used to evaluate test-retest reliability. Construct validity was assessed by factor analysis of the principal components. Results: The Danish PSQ/SRDB was administered to the caregivers of 348 children. An overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.72 was found, confirming the survey’s consistency, with the results for the domains ranging 0.52–0.70. The Danish PSQ/SRDB showed moderate to perfect reliability for all items, except for one question (C14). Factor analysis performed on the Danish PSQ/SRDB showed that the predetermined four factors were similar with the original version of the PSQ/SRDB. Conclusions: The Danish version of the PSQ/SRDB has been successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted, suggesting that it can be used as an appropriate paediatric screening tool for SDB in Denmark.

This study tried to verify how the global competency and personality characteristics of expatriates have an effect on the expatriate's work engagement and cross-cultural adaptation in a reality where the role and job performance of overseas expatriates is growing in importance. In addition, in the relationship between global competency and personality traits on cross-cultural adaptation through work engagement, this study tried to examine how career vision acts as a moderated moderated-mediation effect. The specific hypothesis tested the mediation effect of work engagement in the relationship between global competency and cross-cultural adaptation, and whether there is a moderated-mediation effect through the interaction between conscientiousness and career vision in such mediating model. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, a survey was conducted on Korean expatriates, and the final data of 164 people were analyzed. As a result, the mediation effect of global competency increasing cross-cultural adaptation through work engagement was verified. When the career vision and the conscientiousness were high, it was found that expatriates with high global competency increased their work engagement and had a positive effect on cross-cultural adaptation. However, when the career vision was low and conscientiousness was high, it was found that expatriates with high global competency had relatively low work engagement and had a negative effect on cross-cultural adaptation. Based on these results, the meaning, implications, limitations, and future research of the study were discussed., 본 연구는 해외주재원의 역할과 직무수행에 대한 중요성이 높아지고 있는 현실에서, 주재원 개인의 글로벌 역량과 성격적 특성이 주재원의 직무열의와 이문화 적응에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 검증하고자 하였다. 또한 글로벌 역량과 성격 특성이 직무열의를 거쳐 이문화 적응에 미치는 영향의 관계에서, 커리어비전이 어떻게 조절된 조절-매개효과로서 작용하는지 검증하고자 하였다. 구체적 가설은 글로벌 역량과 이문화 적응의 관계에서 직무열의의 매개효과를 검증하였고, 그와 같은 매개모형에서 성실성과 커리어비전의 상호작용을 통한 조절된 조절-매개효과가 있는지를 검증하였다. 이와 같은 연구목적의 달성을 위해 한국인 주재원들을 대상으로 설문을 진행하였으며, 최종 164명의 데이터를 분석하였다. 그 결과, 글로벌 역량이 직무열의를 통해 이문화 적응을 높이는 매개효과가 검증되었다. 그리고 커리어비전이 높고 성실성도 높았을 때, 글로벌 역량이 높은 주재원은 직무열의가 높아지고 이문화 적응에도 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 하지만 커리어비전이 낮고 성실성이 높았을 때, 글로벌역량이 높은 주재원은 직무열의가 상대적으로 낮아지고 이문화 적응에도 부정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 결과를 바탕으로 연구의 의미와 시사점 그리고 한계점 및 향후 연구에 대해 논의하였다.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Addressing chronic low back pain (cLBP) from the point of view of representation allows better understanding the behaviors associated with it and thus improve its medical and socio-occupational management. The Quebec Questionnaire of Representations related to Work Disability (QRWoD) proposes an evaluation of 9 dimensions of the cLBP-related representation. OBJECTIVE: To translate and adapt the QRoWD to French language and assess its validity and reliability in French cLBP workers on prolonged sick leave. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from March 2017 to April 2018 in the Department of occupational health of the University Hospital of Angers, France. The QRWoD is a self-administered questionnaire (87 items) which assesses Identity, Acute/Chronic duration, Consequences, Personal Control, Treatment Control, Cyclical Timeline, Coherence, Emotional Representation and Causes dimensions. The Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and the convergent validity (Pearson correlations) in comparison to validated instruments for each dimension were assed. RESULTS: Fifty French workers (29 men, 43 +/- 9.1 years, 293.6 +/- 173.0 days of work absence) were included. The internal consistency (all alpha > 0.7) and the convergent validity (all r(2) > 0.25, p < 0.01) of each dimension were very satisfactory except for the Cyclical Timeline dimension. CONCLUSIONS: The French version of the QRoWD seems to be valid and relevant among the target population.

Aims The aim of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of Oxford Hip Score (OHS) to Indonesian, and to evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods We performed a cross-cultural adaptation of Oxford Hip Score into Indonesian language (OHS-ID) and determined its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, floor-ceiling effect, responsiveness, and construct validity by hypotheses testing of its correlation with Harris Hip Score (HHS), vsual analogue scale (VAS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Adults (> 17 years old) with chronic hip pain (osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis) were included. Results A total of 125 patients were included, including 50 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients with six months follow-up. The OHS questionnaire was translated into Indonesian and showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89) and good reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.98). The standard error of measurement value of 2.11 resulted in minimal detectable change score of 5.8. Ten out of ten (100%) a priori hypotheses were met, confirming the construct validity. A strong correlation was found with two subscales of SF-36 (pain and physical function), HHS (0.94), and VAS (-0.83). OHS-ID also showed good responsiveness for post-THA series. Floor and ceiling effect was not found. Conclusion The Indonesian version of OHS showed similar reliability and validity with the original OHS. This questionnaire will be suitable to assess chronic hip pain in Indonesian-speaking patients. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):765–772.

The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is a widely used scale for assessing the severity of ataxia in clinics, natural history studies, and treatment trials worldwide. However, no French translation with validated cross-cultural adaptation is available. This study aimed to translate and adapt the SARA into French. The translation process was conducted according to the ISPOR guidelines for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes. A total of five translators, an expert committee, and two physiotherapists took part in the process to assess and ensure comprehension and language equivalences of the final French version. A few misinterpretations were pointed out during the translation process and were changed accordingly by the translation team. The French version of the SARA is ready to be used in clinical and research settings with French-speaking populations living with ataxia.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Persons with concurrent mental health and substance use disorders often do not participate actively in society and remain marginalized. The promotion of social inclusion is important for the care of persons with concurrent disorders. To measure social inclusion, the Social and Communities Opportunities Profile (SCOPE) was developed, followed by its mini version for English-speaking people in Singapore. In Norway, there is no instrument available to measure social inclusion. Thus, the aim was crosscultural adaptation of SCOPE Mini for persons with concurrent disorders. The Norwegian adaptation was performed using the systematic approach recommended by Beaton et al. After a forward–backward translation, the Norwegian SCOPE-Mini was pretested among 30 persons with a concurrent mental health and substance use disorder in three areas to check its psychometric properties. To evaluate comprehensibility and applicability, participants were asked five open questions. The Norwegian crosscultural adaptation of SCOPE Mini showed acceptable psychometric properties and was considered comparable to the original version. The results of the pre-test showed no linguistic inconsistency, but some indications of the necessity of semantic adaptation regarding the cultural context and persons with concurrent disorders. The Norwegian SCOPE Mini may be a practical tool for health professionals, social workers, and researchers to measure social inclusion among a vulnerable group such as persons with a concurrent mental health and substance use disorder. However, given the relatively small sample size in our study, further research on the validity and reliability of the instrument is recommended.

In sports context, the motivational climate has been widely studied since 2000, when the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sports Questionnaire-2 (PMCSQ-2) was published. Evaluating athletes’ perceptions of the motivational climate created by the coach, this questionnaire has been validated and adapted for different countries, including Brazil. However, important psychometric properties of the Brazilian version present problems, such as poor fit indices and the almost exclusively male samples, make it unfeasible for use in future research. Thus, this study aimed to achieve a new process of cross-cultural adaptation, and search for validity evidence of the PMCSQ-2 for the Brazilian sports context to correct distortions, expand the sources of evidence of validity and ecological validity, and make it suitable for application in future research. The sample consisted of 501 athletes (349 males, 152 females) from different sports. The findings of the current study support the multidimensional hierarchical characteristic of the instrument, its factorial structure, and internal consistency. We concluded that the 33-item PMCSQ-2BR, distributed in two high-order scales (ego-involving and task-involving) with three subscales each, can be used to assess athletes’ perceived motivational climate in the Brazilian sports context.

Pesquisa sem auxílio de agências de fomento Trata-se de um estudo de tradução e validação qualitativa do instrumento The Observer Memory Questionnaire—Parent Form (OMQ-PF) para o Brasil, para avaliar aspectos específicos da memória que podem ser afetados pela Síndrome de Down. As etapas de tradução do instrumento OMQ-PF deram-se de acordo com as diretrizes internacionais de tradução de questionários. Cinco especialistas (três profissionais terapeutas ocupacionais, um fisioterapeuta e um médico) participaram desta etapa. Após a tradução realizamos dois grupos focais para a validação do instrumento. Um grupo foi composto por sete mães de pessoas com síndrome de Down entre 6 a 16 anos de idade, sem diagnóstico de demência, que frequentam uma instituição que atende crianças com deficiência na nossa cidade. O outro grupo foi composto por sete profissionais de saúde da área de reabilitação que trabalham com o público-alvo do instrumento em questão, ou seja, crianças e/ou adolescentes com síndrome de Down. A versão brasileira do OMQ-PF elaborada a partir do processo de tradução, adaptação cultural e validação resultou em um instrumento adaptado à cultura brasileira e confiável para o rastreio e avaliação das habilidades de memória de crianças com síndrome de Down. This is a study of translation and qualitative validation of the instrument The Observer Memory Questionnaire—Parent Form (OMQ-PF) for Brazil, to assess specific aspects of memory that can be affected by Down Syndrome. The translation steps of the OMQ-PF instrument were carried out in accordance with the international guidelines for the translation of questionnaires. Five specialists (three occupational therapists, a physical therapist and a physician) participated in this stage. After the translation, we carried out two focus groups to validate the instrument. One group was composed of seven mothers of people with Down syndrome between 6 and 16 years of age, without a diagnosis of dementia, who attend an institution that serves children with disabilities in our city. The other group was composed of seven health professionals of rehabilitation who work with the target audience of the instrument in question, that is, children and/or adolescents with Down syndrome. The Brazilian version of the OMQ-PF, elaborated from the process of translation, cultural adaptation, and validation, resulted in an instrument adapted to the Brazilian culture and reliable for screening and evaluating the memory skills of children with Down syndrome. Tese (Doutorado)

The Rejection Dis-Identification Model (RDIM) proposes that decreased national identification (and in turn, increased ethnic identification) mediates the effect of perceived discrimination on attitudes towards the out-group. This study tests the application of the Rejection Dis-Identification Model (RDIM) to cultural adaptation, by examining whether ethnic and national identification mediate the effect of perceived discrimination on cross-cultural adaptation. Furthermore, the study also aims at investigating whether four personality traits from the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire (MPQ), i.e., Emotional Stability, Social Initiative, Open-mindedness, and Cultural Empathy, interact with either perceived discrimination, or ethnic and national identification (or both).

Background Despite the criteria already established for the classification of knee osteoarthritis (OA), a radiographic and/or clinical knee OA diagnosis usually occurs in cases of fully manifest or more advanced disease, which can make health promotion, prevention, and functional rehabilitation in more advanced stages of the disease less effective. In addition, radiographic knee OA can generate more financial costs for health services. Therefore, developing and validating screening instruments to assess the probability of development and progression of knee OA would be of great value for both clinical practice and science. Objective To cross-culturally adapt and investigate the measurement properties of the Knee OA Pre-screening Questionnaire Brazilian version. Methods A total of 250 individuals of both sexes aged between 35 and 92 years [(mean (standard deviation): 63 (11) years old; 74.1 (15.1) kg; 1.59 (0.09) m; 29.38 (5.44) kg/m2] participated in this study. The cross-cultural adaptation and analyses of the measurement properties of the KOPS Brazilian version included: (1) assessment of conceptual and item equivalence; (2) assessment of semantic equivalence; (3) assessment of operational equivalence; and (4) assessment of measurement equivalence, reliability, and validity. Results Cronbach’s alpha for the internal consistency among the six components of the KOPS Brazilian version was 0.71. The test-retest 72 h apart for each component resulted in a coefficient correlation intraclass ranging from 0.74 to 1.00. The probability of an individual randomly chosen from the population having KL ≥ 1 and KOPS Brazilian version ≥ 21 points was 0.74 (area under the curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic – AUC of ROC); furthermore, the AUC for KL ≥ 2 and the KOPS Brazilian version ≥ 23 points was 0.77. Conclusion The KOPS Brazilian version is a reliable and valid instrument for early screening of knee OA in individuals aged 35 years and over in the Brazilian context.

Most scales developed to assess childhood developmental outcomes are western-based and are written in the English language. This study aimed at translating and cross-culturally adapting the CEDV scale from English to Swahili to meet the social-cultural context of Tanzania and to enable Tanzanian children to effectively associate their exposure to inter-parental violence. The study was conducted in Iringa, Southern Tanzania, involving a sample of 247 i.e., 236 children (9-12-year-olds) and 11 adult participants. The adults comprised seven trans-lators, a clinical psychologist, a childhood assessment expert, and two primary school teachers who were involved in translation work and adaptation evaluation workshops; selected using purposive and snowball techniques. Furthermore, a sub-final Swahili CEDV version was pretested with 10 purposively selected bilingual school-based child participants using cognitive interviews; while a survey with 210 randomly selected school children pilot tested a final CEDV Swahili measure. A 40-item Swahili CEDV scale, with good internal consistency (omega = 0.89) emerged. Further testing of the Swahili CEDV for its validity is warranted to allow researchers and clinicians to be availed a measurement scale that is culturally relevant, reliable and valid for assessing Swahili speaking children's exposures to inter-parental violence.

Background: Fibromyalgia (FM), a complex neurological disorder, has multiple consequences for the patient. To diagnose patients, healthcare practitioners use multiple diagnostic questionnaires. However, Arabic translated or validated tools are lacking. This study aimed to translate and validate the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) into the Arabic language. Methods: Forward and backward translations of the FiRST were conducted by two Arabic translators and two English-certified translators. The survey was piloted (n = 5) and subjected to cognitive interviews and psychometric analysis. Patients were recruited from a university hospital in Riyadh and an FM support group in Saudi Arabia. The internal consistency, factor analysis, and test–retest correlations were evaluated. Results: This study included 46 patients. The stepwise translation process resulted in minor edits related to the use of synonyms to the survey items. The translated survey had a good internal consistency and test–retest correlation, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.7 and Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.79 (p-value < 0.001), respectively. The survey was factorable into two themes: generalized symptoms and more specific sensations. Conclusions: The Arabic FiRST is a simple, valid, and reliable tool to diagnose patients with FM in different settings.

Introduction/Objective. This study aimed to translate the original disease-specific Malocclusion Impact Questionnaire (MIQ) into Serbian and validate the new version in the cohort of young Serbian orthodontic patients. Methods. At the university clinic, 154 patients filled out the MIQ in Serbian before the start of the orthodontic treatment; 112 participants filled out the same questionnaire four weeks later. The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need ? Dental Health Component (IOTN-DHC) and Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) pretreatment scores were recorded. Descriptive statistic, Cronbach?s ?, Spearman?s ?, and exploratory factor analysis, followed by parallel analysis for factor reduction, were calculated and analyzed. Results. One hundred forty-eight patients with no missing responses (51 male, 97 female), of the average age of 13.3 ? 2 years, had MIQ total scores mean of 10.14 ? 7.451. Internal reliability (? = 0.913), external reliability (? = 0.906; p = 0.000), construct validity tested by MIQ total scores and two global question scores? correlations (? = 0.682; p = 0.000 and ? = 0.366; p = 0.000), as well as clinical validity tested by correlations of MIQ total scores with PAR pretreatment scores (? = 0.181; p < 0.05), and IOTN-DHC scores (? = 0.192; p < 0.05) were positive and statistically significant. One item factor was extracted and it explained a large part of the cumulative variance. Conclusion. Reliability and validity of the translated and cross-culturally adapted MIQ in Serbian is satisfactory. It could be used for malocclusion-related quality of life assessments in young Serbian orthodontic patients.

he present study examines the social skills of Turkish students during their cross-cultural transition to the academic and social cultures of Japan. One of the purposes of this study is to partially fill the gap in the literature by exploring and identifying Turkish students’ social skills during their stay in Japan. Another purpose of the study is to differentiate social skills, particularly used in educational settings – such as the classroom environment – from those exhibited in other contexts. This study also aims to provide universities with potential solutions to design better support and provide aid to Turkish students through their transition stages. A semi-structured interview was selected as the primary data collection tool for the present research. A total of 21 students from Turkey who were in higher education or had already obtained a degree from a university in Japan volunteered to participate in this study. Each interview transcript was individually examined via qualitative analysis, aiming to identify and categorize cross-cultural social skills. The analysis produced separate hierarchical levels of categories related to both the academic and social cultures of Japan. The findings revealed that Turkish students tend to use different types of social skills in different settings which are labelled “social skills specific to academic culture in Japan” and “culture-specific social skills.” Additionally, the cross-cultural social skills of Turkish students are classified in respect of their use (i.e., acquired skills, avoided skills, and maintained skills), based on a previous study.

Background Homelessness is an increasing problem worldwide, and the origins of homelessness in high‐income countries are multifaceted. Due to stigma and discrimination, persons in homelessness delay seeking health care, resulting in avoidable illness and death. The Attitudes Towards Homelessness Inventory (ATHI) was developed to cover multiple dimensions of attitudes toward persons in homelessness and to detect changes in multiple segments of populations. It has, however, not previously been translated to Swedish. Aims The aim of the present study was to translate, cross‐culturally adapt, and psychometrically test the ATHI for use in a Swedish healthcare context. Methods The project used a traditional forward‐ and back‐translation process in six stages: (1) two simultaneous translations by bilingual experts; (2) expert review committee synthesis; (3) blind back‐translation; (4) expert review committee deliberations; (5) pre‐testing with cognitive interviews including registered nurses (n = 5), nursing students (n = 5), and women in homelessness (n = 5); and (6) psychometric evaluations. The final ATHI questionnaire was answered by 228 registered nurses and nursing students in the year 2019. Results The translation process was systematically conducted and entailed discussions regarding semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine if the collected data fitted the hypothesized four‐factor structure of the ATHI. Overall, it was found that the model had an acceptable fit and that the Swedish version of ATHI may be used in a Swedish healthcare context. Linking Evidence to Action The ATHI has been shown to be a psychometrically acceptable research instrument for use in a Swedish healthcare context. The systematic and rigorous process applied in this study, including experts with diverse competencies in translation proceedings and testing, improved the reliability and validity of the final Swedish version of the ATHI. The instrument may be used to investigate attitudes toward women in homelessness among nursing students and RNs in Sweden.

This study aimed to psychometrically evaluate the Turkish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire (MSISQ-15) in women with MS. The study included 130 women with MS. The Turkish linguistic validation process of the original English MSISQ-15 was performed according to standardized guidelines. Reliability analysis was evaluated with test-retest analysis and intra-class correlation (ICC). Internal consistency between the items was analyzed using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Item analysis results were used to assess the contribution of the items to the scale. In evaluating the validity of the scale, the relationship between the MSISQ and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire-54 (MSQOL-54), and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PSIQ-12) was investigated. Psychometric properties were analyzed using internal consistency, test-rest reliability, construct validity, and floor-ceiling effect. The internal consistency of the Turkish MSISQ-15 was strong in terms of both sub-dimension score and the total score (Cronbach's a coefficient > 0.80). The test-retest reliability of the scale was very strong (ICC > 0.90). A medium-high correlation was found between the MSISQ-15 and the MSQOL-54, the FSFI, and the PSIQ-12 (between r =-0.448 and r =-0.798, p < 0.001, respectively). The MSISQ-15 is a comprehensive, reliable, and valid inventory to obtain information about the cause of sexual dysfunction in Turkish women with MS and to evaluate the level of sexual dysfunction. In future studies, it is recommended to examine the sensitivity of the Turkish MSISQ-15 to treatment-related changes. Bozok University research Ethics Com-mittee [2017-KAEK 189_2021.07.07_08] Funding Information The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Bozok University research Ethics Com-mittee (Desicion number: 2017-KAEK 189_2021.07.07_08) for studies involving humans.

Background: In France, more than 20% of women require induction of labor (IOL), which can be psychologically and emotionally challenging for patients. It is important to assess how they feel about their IOL experiences. Our aim was to cross-culturally adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of a French version of the EXIT to assess women’s experiences of IOL. Methods: The EXIT was cross-culturally adapted by conducting forward and backward translations following international guidelines. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the ten French EXIT items: data completeness, factor analysis, internal consistency, score distribution, floor and ceiling effects, inter-subscale correlations, convergent validity, and test–retest reliability. Results: The EXIT was successfully cross-culturally adapted to the French context and any IOL method. The results obtained from 163 patients requiring IOL showed good acceptability. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution with subscales reflecting the experiential aspects of time taken to give birth, discomfort with IOL, and subsequent contractions. Good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha or Spearman correlation coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.84) and good test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.66 to 0.85) for the three identified subscales were found. Conclusions: The ten-item French EXIT is a valid and reliable instrument for the self-assessment of women’s experiences of IOL in the three weeks following delivery for any method of IOL used. As a patient-reported outcome measure, it would allow the comparison of experiential outcomes across IOL studies in order to include women’s preferences in decisions regarding their care.

Pap smear screening can detect cervical cancer early, but is underutilized. Motivational factors play a role in ensuring that women undergo Pap smear screening. This study was conducted to validate the adapted instrument, which was based on the protection motivation theory (PMT), into the Malay language to evaluate the motivational factors for Pap smear screening among women. The original 26-item PMT scale was developed based on seven constructs of the PMT framework. The adaptation involved translation by bilingual experts (n = 4), followed by synthesis (n = 6). Subsequently, we performed content validation (content validation index, CVI) among the health experts (n = 5) and face validation (face validation index, FVI) among women (n = 11). Reliability testing for internal consistency was determined via the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of women aged between 21 and 65 years (n = 150). One item was deleted based on the expert consensus, leaving a total of 25 items after the adaptation. The validation yielded a good CVI and FVI. Prior to CFA reliability testing, one item was deleted due to very low factor loading. The CFA indicated a good fit for 24 items. The factor loading (range: 0.45–0.98), average variance extracted (range: 0.44–0.90), and composite reliability (range: 0.69–0.97) indicated that the convergent validity for each construct was acceptable, except for the perceived vulnerability. However, the perceived vulnerability construct was accepted based on expert verification. We confirmed that the translation, cross-cultural, adaptation, and validation of the Malay-version PMT scale were valid and reliable. The scale contains 24 items that represent the seven constructs of the PMT framework.

Introduction The Internet Gaming Disorder Scale – Short Form (IGDS9-SF) assesses the severity, harmful effects and/or consequences of excessive online and offline gaming. Its conciseness and theoretical foundations on current diagnostic criteria of gaming disorders make it a useful resource for clinical and screening settings. Objective To describe the process of cross-cultural adaptation of the IGDS9-SF to the Brazilian context. Methods The cross-cultural adaptation involved the steps of independent translation of the instrument, synthesis version, back-translation, pre-test and elaboration of the final version. Content validity assessment was conducted by a multidisciplinary committee of experts and consisted of both a quantitative analysis (calculation of content validity coefficients – CVC) and a qualitative analysis (assessment of the experts’ comments and suggestions). The pre-test sample consisted of 30 gamers with variable sociodemographic characteristics. Results The cross-cultural adaptation of the scale followed the proposed protocol, and the CVC was satisfactory (≥ 0.83) for all the structures and equivalences assessed. Most of the suggestions made by the experts were accepted (mainly adjustments and language standardization). The gamers who participated in the pre-test judged the scale easy to understand and did not suggest changes. Discussion The Brazilian version of the IGDS9-SF showed adequate content validity and is available for researchers and clinicians, as well as for the investigation of additional psychometric characteristics.

Refugees are survivors of extreme, cumulative potentially-traumatic events (PTEs), which can violate their goals, beliefs and sense of purpose (i.e. global meaning) and cause significant psychological distress. Despite being disproportionately affected by PTEs, there are few psychological instruments available in refugees’ native languages, and which consider their cultural and traumatic diversity. Our aim is to describe the process of cross-cultural adaption of the Global Meaning Violation Scale (GMVS) for use with Arabic-speaking refugees in resettlement. Methods: Following the ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests, we engaged the assistance of psychometry, language, cultural and content experts to translate and adapt the GMVS to Arabic. Results: Experts based in Portugal, Jordan, US and Germany participated in the translation and adaptation process. The scale was considered straightforward and overall cohesive and, by addressing feelings rather than mental health issues, culturally-appropriate. Potential problems related to the complexity of the construct, cultural appropriateness of the “Intimacy (emotional closeness)” item, and use of a Likert Scale. Discussion: The overall process of translating and adapting the GMVS to Arabic was lengthy and resource-intensive. Researchers should carefully consider availability of resources when planning research with culturally diverse populations. يعتبر اللاجئون ناجين من أحداث قاسية، تراكمية، وذات قدرة على ترك صدمة (PTEs)، والتي بدورها قد تنتهك أهدافهم، معتقداتهم، وشعورهم بامتلاك هدف (أي المعنى العالمي) وتسبب لهم ضائقة نفسية بالغة. على الرغم من تأثرها بشكل غير متناسب بتلك الأحداث (PTEs)، هناك بضع أدوات نفسية متوفرة في اللغة الأم للاجئين التي تأخذ بعين الاعتبار تنوع ثقافتهم والصدمات التي تعرضوا لها. هدفنا هو توصيف عملية التكييف عابر الثقافات لمقياس الانتهاك بالمعنى العالمي للاستخدام مع اللاجئين الناطقين باللغة العربية في أماكن إعادة التوطين. المنهجية: وفقًا لإرشادات ITC لاختبارات الترجمة والتكييف، قمنا بإشراك مساعدة خبراء في القياس النفسي، اللغة، الثقافة، والمحتوى، لترجمة مقياس الانتهاك بالمعنى العالمي وتكييفه مع اللغة العربية. النتائج: خبراء في البرتغال، الأردن، الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية وألمانيا شاركوا في عملية الترجمة والتكييف. اعتُبر المقياس واضحاً ومترابط إجمالًا، وملائم ثقافياً من خلال تركيزه على المشاعر بدلًا من قضايا الصحة النفسية. المشاكل المحتملة تعلق بتعقيد بنية الدراسة، الملائمة الثقافية لموضوع "الحميمية (التقارب العاطفي)"، واستخدام مقياس likert. المناقشة: كانت العملية العامة لترجمة وتكييف مقياس الانتهاك بالمعنى العالمي للغة العربية عملية طويلة ومتطلبة للمصادر بشكل مكثف. يجب على الباحثين الأخذ بعين الاعتبار وبعناية توفر المصادر عند تخطيط بحث مع مجموعات متنوعة ثقافياً. Os refugiados são sobreviventes de múltiplos acontecimentos potencialmente traumáticos (PTEs), de caráter extremo, que podem desestruturar os seus objetivos, crenças e senso de propósito (i.e., sentido global) e causar distress psicológico significativo. Apesar de serem desproporcionalmente afetados por PTEs, há poucos instrumentos psicológicos que integram a diversidade cultural e traumática das populações refugiadas e que estão disponíveis nas suas línguas maternas. O nosso objetivo é descrever o processo de tradução e adaptação cultural da Global Meaning Violation Scale (GMVS) para refugiados falantes de árabe. Métodos: Seguindo as diretrizes da ITC para tradução e adaptação de testes, procedemos à adaptação transcultural da GMVS para árabe, através de um comité de especialistas em psicometria, conteúdo, língua e culturas árabes para traduzir e adaptar a GMVS. Resultados: Reunimos um conjunto de especialistas sediados em Portugal, Jordânia, EUA e Alemanha para traduzir e adaptar a GMVS. A escala foi considerada simples, globalmente coesa e, ao focar-se em sentimentos e não em questões de saúde mental, foi considerada culturalmente apropriada. Foram identificados potenciais problemas relativos à complexidade do construto, adequação cultural do item “Intimidade (proximidade emocional)” e utilização de escala de Likert. Discussão: O processo de tradução e adaptação da GMVS para árabe foi moroso e muito exigente em termos de recursos. É fundamental que os investigadores tenham especial atenção à disponibilidade e acesso a recursos, no trabalho com populações culturalmente diversas.

BackgroundMobile health (mHealth) apps have shown the advantages of improving medication compliance, saving time required for diagnosis and treatment, reducing medical expenses, etc. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that mHealth apps should be evaluated prior to their implementation to ensure their accuracy in data analysis.ObjectiveThis study aimed to translate the patient version of the interactive mHealth app usability questionnaire (MAUQ) into Chinese, and to conduct cross-cultural adaptation and reliability and validity tests.MethodsThe Brislin’s translation model was used in this study. The cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to experts’ comments and the results of prediction test. The convenience sampling method was utilized to investigate 346 patients who used the “Good Doctor” (“Good Doctor” is the most popular mHealth app in China), and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were evaluated as well.ResultsAfter translation and cross-cultural adaptation, there were a total of 21 items and 3 dimensions: usability and satisfaction (8 items), system information arrangement (6 items), and efficiency (7 items). The content validity index was determined to be 0.952, indicating that the 21 items used to evaluate the usability of the Chinese version of the MAUQ were well correlated. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.912, which revealed that the questionnaire had a high internal consistency. The values of test-retest reliability and split-half reliability of the Chinese version of the MAUQ were 0.869 and 0.701, respectively, representing that the questionnaire had a good stability.ConclusionThe translated questionnaire has good reliability and validity in the context of Chinese culture, and it could be used as a usability testing tool for the patient version of interactive mHealth apps.

This research was a qualitative exploration of seven graduate students’ lived experiences with the use of social media (SM) as a learning space. An integrated thematic analysis based on data provided via interviews, observations, and artifacts yielded 13 main themes, offering a rich description of participants’ experiences with using SM for advanced formal learning. The participants had varying ideas about definitions of SM, indicating that establishing clarity with respect to SM as a concept is important to both research and the practical integration of SM applications in advanced learning contexts. Regardless of conceptual inconsistencies, these graduate students primarily reported positive experiences with using SM for graduate studies: major source of learning and motivating and engaging emerged as main themes. Themes related to cross-cultural aspects also emerged in that SM facilitates cross-cultural adaptation and increases global/cross-cultural communication and interaction skills. Themes for the primary advantages of SM were convenience, collaboration/connection, and transcends geographical boundaries. The primary disadvantages were that SM could be overwhelming/boring, distracting/time consuming, and involve interpersonal challenges. The credibility of resources can also be an issue. Main themes for suggestions included recommendations for educators’ integration of social media (for classwork) and students’ management of social media. The study provides novel insight into the use of SM for learning from graduate students representing different geographic and cultural perspectives. Importantly, the findings provide rich qualitative data that provide convergent support for the generalizability of the findings from quantitative survey studies as well as providing insight into how varying conceptualizations of SM can influence participants’ responses in research and their actual use of various applications.

The study of adolescent dating violence is relevant for Public Health, given its predictive nature and the social impact of this variable on the coexistence of the adult population. Dating violence rating scales need to be validated to ensure the reliability and certainty of their results.Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties of the modified M-CTS conflict tactics scale in the context of dating violence among Ecuadorian adolescents.Materials and methods: This is a validation study through confirmatory factor analysis and analysis of linguistic and cultural variables, with probabilistic sampling (n = 1249) with ages between 12-20 years, who met the requirements of having or having had a dating relationship.Results: 6 questions were culturally modified, and the 4-factor structure of the questionnaire was verified (argumentation, psychological violence, mild physical and severe physical). Low reliability was found for the perpetrator argument (0.26) and victimization (026) items and good reliability for severe physical violence for both profiles (0.80 and 0.76).Main conclusions:The cultural adaptation of the M-CTS offered adequate validity for the diverse types of violence in the Ecuadorian adolescent population, allowing to compare the prevalence found in other countries that used this instrument based on the same theoretical and methodological perspectives. El estudio de la violencia en el noviazgo adolescente tiene relevancia para la Salud Pública, dado su carácter predictivo y el impacto social de esta variable en la convivencia de la población adulta. Las escalas de valoración de violencia en el noviazgo requieren ser validadas para asegurar la fiabilidad y la certeza de sus resultados. Objetivo: Analizar las propiedades psicométricas de la escala de tácticas de conflicto modificada M-CTS en el contexto de la violencia en el noviazgo de adolescentes ecuatorianos. Materiales y métodos: Se trata de un estudio de validación mediante análisis factorial confirmatorio y análisis de variables lingüísticas y culturales, con muestreo al probabilístico (n=1249) con edades comprendidas entre 13 y 19 años, que cumplieron los requisitos de tener o haber tenido una relación de noviazgo.Resultados: Fueron modificadas culturalmente 6 preguntas y fue verificada la estructura de 4 factores del cuestionario (argumentación, violencia psicológica, física leve y física severa). Se encontró una baja fiabilidad para el ítem argumentación perpetrador (0,26) y victimización (0,26) y buena fiabilidad para violencia física grave para los dos perfiles (0,80 y 0,76). Conclusiones principales: La adaptación cultural del M-CTS ofreció una validez adecuada para los diferentes tipos de violencia en población adolescente ecuatoriana permitiendo comparar las prevalencias encontradas con otros países que usaron este instrumento basado en las mismas perspectivas teóricas y metodológicas.

Purpose The aim of the study is to present the process of translation, adaptation and validation of the Client-Centred Rehabilitation Questionnaire (CCRQ) in the Spanish context. Methods The process integrates two sequential phases. Phase 1 consists of a questionnaire translation and back-translation process conducted by a panel of experts, and a pilot study. In phase 2, CCRQ-e (Spanish version) was administered to 305 rehabilitation inpatients to collect evidence on the reliability and validity of the instrument. Results The exploratory and confirmatory analysis confirmed seven original domains, eliminating four items from the original scale. CCRQ-e has a good internal consistency. Discriminative construct validity distinguished significant differences based on age, educational level, and severity of diagnosis. Criterion validity of the CCRQ and EQ-5D showed negative significant correlations between CCRQ-e and the general perception of health EQ-VAS, and a positive correlation between CCRQ-e and EQ pain and EQ anxiety (higher scores in CCRQ-e mean lower client-centered practice perceived). Conclusions The Spanish version of the CCRQ is suitable for evaluating person-centered rehabilitation from the person's perspective. It includes aspects related to the comfort, decision-making, and participation of the client, as well as questions about the provision of service and the environment. Implications for rehabilitation The original seven domains of the CCRQ could be replicated in the sample of patients from Spanish rehabilitation services. By eliminating four items from the original scale, the validated scale, known as the CCRQ-e (Spanish version), was obtained. The CCRQ-e allows a reliable and valid evaluation of the perception of the person-centeredness of the Spanish rehabilitation services. The CCRQ-e is the first self-reported measure in Spanish of an individual's experience during the rehabilitation service. DDEUIT

Purpose The evaluation of measurement properties such as reliability, measurement error, construct validity, and responsiveness provides information on the quality of the scale as a whole, rather than on an item level. We aimed to synthesize the measurement properties referring to reliability, measurement error, construct validity, and responsiveness of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment questionnaires (Achilles tendon—VISA-A, greater trochanteric pain syndrome—VISA-G, proximal hamstring tendinopathy—VISA-H, patellar tendon—VISA-P). Methods A systematic review was conducted according to Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments methodology (COSMIN). PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, SportsDiscus, grey literature, and reference lists were searched. Studies assessing the measurement properties concerning reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the VISA questionnaires in patients with lower limb tendinopathies were included. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of studies assessing reliability, validity, and responsiveness using the COSMIN guidelines and the evidence for these measurement properties. A modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was applied to the evidence synthesis. Results There is moderate-quality evidence for sufficient VISA-A, VISA-G, and VISA-P reliability. There is moderate-quality evidence for sufficient VISA-G and VISA-P measurement error, and high-quality evidence for sufficient construct validity for all the VISA questionnaires. Furthermore, high-quality evidence exists with regard to VISA-A for sufficient responsiveness in patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy following conservative interventions. Conclusions Sufficient reliability, measurement error, construct validity and responsiveness were found for the VISA questionnaires with variable quality of evidence except for VISA-A which displayed insufficient measurement error. Level of evidence IV. Registration details Prospero (CRD42018107671); PROSPERO reference—CRD42019126595.Other Information Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0See article on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06557-0

Archives of Allied Health Sciences, 34, 1, Ahead of print

The Positive Body Image among Adolescents Scale (PBIAS) explores the factors that bolster and interfere with developing and maintaining a positive body image during adolescence. The aim of this study was to translate, adapt, and validate the PBIAS into Spanish and Catalan. A cross-sectional study was conducted for the instrument’s translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation. A process of translation, back-translation, expert consultation, and piloting was followed. The reliability and statistical validity were evaluated. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.95 in both the Spanish and Catalan versions. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were statistically significant (r > 0.087) for all items analyzed. The resulting values of the Spanish and Catalan versions indicate a good level of concordance (p < 0.001) with the original questionnaire, the comparative fit index being 0.914 and 0.913, the Tucker–Lewis index being 0.893 and 0.892, the root mean square error of approximation being 1.31 and 1.28, and the standardized root mean square residual being 0.051 and 0.060, respectively. The instrument presents a good level of internal consistency, a high level of reliability, and statistical validity compared to the original instrument. The PBIAS in Spanish and Catalan can be a useful assessment instrument for educators and health professionals in the context of adolescent mental health literacy. This work contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals (Goal 3) of the United Nations 2030 Agenda.

This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of Graded Chronic Pain Scale 2.0 (GCPS 2.0) and Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20) of the Malaysian English version of Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (M-English DC/TMD). GCPS 2.0 and JFLS-20 underwent psychometric analysis involving content, face, criterion, and construct (exploratory factor analysis (EFA), convergent, discriminant, known group) validity including internal and test-retest reliability on 208 samples. The construct validity was assessed against 14 hypotheses and non-parametric statistics were used to assess the data. The GCPS 2.0 and JFLS-20 had high internal consistencies (α = 0.85 and 0.96) with an intraclass correlation coefficient value of 0.95 and 0.97, respectively. The content validity index for GCPS 2.0 and JFLS-20 were 0.87 and 0.95, respectively. The EFA of GCPS 2.0 identified one factor whereas three factors were identified for JFLS-20. Both instruments had moderate to strong positive correlation with other instruments when assessing for concurrent (r = 0.75–0.80, p < 0.01) and convergent (r = 0.58–0.70, p < 0.01) validity, while moderate to high negative correlation (r = −0.86–−0.68, p < 0.01) against the global self-rating oral health items. Based on the study, GCPS 2.0 and JFLS-20 of the M-English DC/TMD proven to be reliable and valid for use in the Malaysian population with TMD.

Aim: The high heterogeneity in the definitions of low back pain encountered in the literature has led to the development of standardized definitions of this condition called “Delphi definitions of low back pain prevalence (Delphi DOLBaPP)” by a group of international researchers. In order to be widely used, these definitions need to be adapted according to the cultural and linguistic context. The aim of this work was to perform the cross-cultural adaptation of the Delphi DOLBaPP definitions in Quebecc French and to pre-test them among French-speaking adults. Methods: In order to enable practical use of the Delphi DOLBaPP definitions in different contexts, their presentation was adapted in the form of a questionnaire (referred to as the “Delphi DOLBaPP questionnaire”). The process of cross-cultural adaptation of the Delphi DOLBaPP questionnaire in French was conducted according to the most recognized recommendations for the cultural adaptation of measuring instruments. The resulting questionnaire and an evaluation form were then submitted to a sample of 82 adults. Results: A total of 41 participants (50.0%) reported low back pain. A high proportion of participants (89.0%) stated that it took them less than 5 minutes to complete the questionnaire. More than 62.0% of them did not find any question poorly worded or confusing. Nearly 80.0% of the participants found the questionnaire easy to understand. The cross-cultural adaptation process suggested minor modifications to the original Delphi DOLBaPP questionnaire. Conclusions: This study has produced a cross-cultural adaptation of the Delphi DOLBaPP questionnaire in Quebec French that will enable French-speaking populations to share the benefits of using standardized definitions of low back pain in epidemiological studies.

Background Early identification of patients who require palliative and supportive care at the general palliative care level is challenging. The Supportive & Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) might provide a helpful framework for this process. Aim To translate, culturally adapt and content validate SPICT™-DK in hospital, primary care, and general practice and within the broader Danish health care context. Methods SPICT™-DK was translated and cross-culturally validated by using the TRAPD-model (Translation, Review, adjudication, pretesting, and documentation) as well as the EORTC- translation guide (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer). In the pre-(pilot) testing phase, six focus group interviews and five individual interviews were conducted involving n = 29 health care professionals from general practice, primary care, and hospital. The qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis and the SPICT™-DK was then revised and published. Results The interviews revealed that SPICT™-DK can be used to identify people with palliative care needs. Three themes were derived from the analysis and showed SPICT™-DK provides a linguistic framework but must be used as an interdisciplinary tool as that SPICT™-DK requires competencies and collaboration. Conclusion SPICT™-DK is now translated and culturally validated in a Danish healthcare setting. The tool is useful to identify people with palliative care needs but must be implemented as an interdisciplinary collaborative intervention. SPICT™ -DK cannot be used by all healthcare professionals as it requires disease-specific competencies. However, it provides a common language for early palliative care interventions which can form the basis for interdisciplinary planning of future treatment and care.

Aim The aim of this study is to explore the use of the Questionnaire Appraisal System with a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in cognitive interviewing for cross‐cultural adaptation. Design This is a descriptive methodological study. Methods Using the Mandarin version of the Post‐Stroke Checklist as an example, cognitive interviews were conducted with 27 stroke survivors in Guangzhou between November 2020 and February 2021. The Questionnaire Appraisal System was applied as a codebook in focus group discussions to perform quantitative data collections and quantitative content analysis. Results Thirty‐eight problems were proposed in focus group discussions and identified all but four of the 30 questions that emerged in the cognitive interviews. A new item was added to the Questionnaire Appraisal System for better categorization. Four categories and six subcategories of problems in the checklist were revealed.

Background In the context of demographic aging, active aging must be encouraged. In addition, the increase in life expectancy requires specific care for the elderly. Therefore, it is important to ensure appropriate training and education to caregivers. Educational institutions put value in positively influencing the attitudes and behaviours towards elderly people in order to ensure the quality of patient care in the future. Questionnaires are often used to assess attitudes. Among them, the University of California, Los Angeles Geriatrics Attitudes Scale (UCLA-GAS) was developed to assess attitudes towards older people and caring for older patients. This scale has been used to evaluate attitude of healthcare professionals and students including undergraduate physiotherapy students. To our knowledge, there is no scale that assesses the same concept in French. Therefore, this study aimed to translate and adapt the UCLA-GAS into French and to test its psychometric properties. Methods We conducted this study in two phases. First, we translated and adapted the UCLA-GAS from English into French following the five recommended stages of cross-cultural adaptation. Second, we validated the French version of the scale with undergraduate physiotherapy students. One hundred nineteen students participated from the first to the third academic years. We estimated reliability and validity of the scale. We performed correlation analyses between the French version of the UCLA-GAS (UCLA-GAS-F) with the Aging Stereotypes and Exercise Scale (ASES) and the Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire (AAQ). Results The scale was translated and adapted into French. Results of the validation phase showed that the UCLA-GAS-F had high test-retest reliability (ICC 0.83, 95%CI 0.74–0.89), but internal consistency below 0.7 (Cronbach’s alpha 0.49 to 0.57). The scale showed no ceiling or floor effect. As expected, the French version showed a weak correlation to the ASES (r = 0.28, p = .003) and to the AAQ (r = 0.32, p = .001). Conclusions Despite low internal consistency, the French version of the UCLA-GAS showed appropriate psychometric properties. Further validation should include healthcare professionals and other healthcare students.

This study aimed to test the validity of the cross-cultural adapted Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument for Brazilians (NLit-Br). An observational cross-sectional study was performed in chronic disease clinics from the Brazilian Public Health System in two phases: (1) linguistic and cultural adaptation and (2) validity testing. Six registered dietitians and thirty adult patients diagnosed with at least one chronic disease participated in the study using the nutrition literacy assessment instrument (NLit-Br) and the short assessment of health literacy for Portuguese-speaking adults (SAHLPA-18). Sample descriptive variables: age, sex, race, income, education, and occupation. To adapt the instrument to the Brazilian Portuguese and Brazilian culture, we tested cognitive interviewing and the Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) with a group of dietitians and patients. To test the tool’s validity, health literacy (SAHLPA-18) was used as a construct that presents similarities and differences with nutrition literacy (NLit-Br). The correlation of NLit-Br and the SAHLPA-18 was tested (Spearman’s Rho). Internal consistency was measured by Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20). The NLit-Br content validity (S-CVI = 0.85) and internal consistency (KR-20 = 0.868) were confirmed. Additionally, NLit-Br presented a significant and robust correlation with SAHLPA-18 (r = 0.665, p < 0.001). Therefore, the NLit-Br was considered a linguistic, cultural, and valid instrument to measure Brazilian’s nutrition literacy.

The literature on measure translation tends to hold, overtly or covertly, a questionable assumption about the possibility of exact translation and almost completely ignores issues of within language variation. Equally, psychometric methods used to assess cross-cultural validity after translation focus on large sample tests of cross-sectional measurement invariance. Such invariance is often not found and is of dubious pertinence to change/outcome measures usually used in psychotherapy research. We present a sequential process of three substudies using quantitative and qualitative procedures to explore whether an outcome measure needs to be changed when used across language variation. Qualitative data confirmed that an item was not ideal in the new context. However, quantitative exploration showed that, although statistically significant and affected by gender and item order, the impact of changing the item in the overall score was small, allowing retention of the existing Spanish translation. We argue that the myth of perfect translation and over-reliance on large-sample psychometric testing pursuing measurement invariance limit exploration of language effects. We recommend that these be used in the companion of user-based, sequential, mixed-method exploration to support the development of a richer field of understanding of outcomes and change self-report measures across languages and cultures and both across and within languages.

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment is considered among the most relevant outcome measures following conservative and surgical interventions for various spinal conditions. Several questions are available to evaluate HRQOL in these conditions. A more recent Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) questionnaire was developed for this purpose and showed high validity in measuring HRQOL. To translate and adapt the ISYQOL questionnaire into Arabic language (ISYQOL-Ar) and evaluate its validity and reliability, and to correlate it with the validated revised Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r)'s Arabic questionnaire in a cross-sectional multicenter study. The ISYQOL was translated, back-translated, and reviewed by an expert committee. Reliability assessment for the questionnaire domains was performed using Cronbach's alpha. For construct validation, the Pearson's correlation coefficient was used. A total of 115 patients were enrolled in the study and completed the ISYQOL-Ar and Arabic SRS-22r questionnaires. A total of 72 patients (63%) completed the first set of questionnaires, and 2 weeks later, 63 patients (55%) completed both sets of questionnaires, with 15.8 a mean age, 39.5° mean Cobb angle of 88.9% females. ISYQOL-Ar showed excellent validity, good reliability, and internal consistency for spine health and brace wear, with Cronbach's alpha > 0.6, similar to SRS-22r in the same cohort. The correlation was significant between ISYQOL-Ar and Arabic SRS-22r (Pearson's coefficient = 0.708, P

Background The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire—MHQ—is a well-known self-assessment questionnaire, where patients’ own perception in terms of recovery, pain and the ability to return to activities of daily living is assessed. The purpose of the study was to translate and culturally adapt the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire to Swedish and to test the validity and reliability in patients with surgically treated distal radius fractures. Methods The cross-cultural adaptation and the translation process were conducted according to predefined guidelines. Seventy-eight patients with surgically treated distal radius fractures completed the translated version of the questionnaire on their six-week follow-up visit. Results The translation and cross-cultural adaptation process revealed no major linguistic or cultural issues. The internal consistency of the MHQ-Swe ranged from 0.77 to 0.94 at test 1 and from 0.81 to 0.96 at test 2 for all subscales, which indicates good internal consistency in the subscales. The hand function subscale revealed the lowest results and work performance the highest. The ICCs showed excellent test-retest reliability, ranging from 0.77 to 0.90 on all MHQ subscales and 0.92 on total score. The highest results for the ICC were seen in the satisfaction subscale (ICC = 0.90), while the lowest were seen in the aesthetic subscale (ICC = 0.77). The correlation analysis between the MHQ-Swe, PRWE and VAS showed a generally moderate to high correlation for all the subscales. Conclusions The Swedish version of the MHQ, the MHQ-Swe, showed good validity and reliability and it is therefore an appropriate and relevant questionnaire for use in patients with surgically treated distal radius fractures. Trial registration FoU i VGR, Projectnumber: 208491, registered December 9, 2015.

Background Biomechanical risk factors have been identified as the main predisposing factor of chronic low back pain (CLBP), especially in Army personnel. The Job Requirements and Physical Demands (JRPD) questionnaire has been developed to assess the biomechanical exposures related to CLBP. Examining the biomechanical risk factors could prevent CLBP. This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the JRPD into Persian and assess its psychometric properties among Iranian male Army personnel with CLBP. Methods In this cross-sectional study, the content validation of the JRPD was assessed after translating to Persian. The Persian JRPD was administered to 198 male Army personnel with CLBP, with an interval of 7 days, to assess test-retest reliability, including Cronbach’s α, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change at 95% confidence interval (MDC95%). Scores of the Persian JRPD were correlated with the scores of visual analog scale (VAS), Borg’s category-ratio (CR10) scale, general health questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28), and physical functioning (PF1 and PF2) subscale of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) to assess convergent validity using Spearman correlation for a priori hypotheses. Results The Persian JRPD had good content validity evidenced by the higher content validity index (> 0.70). The questionnaire had a significant positive negligible to weak correlation with the VAS (rho = 0.27; p p = 0.009), and the total score of GHQ-28 and its domains (rho ≤0.34; p 2 (rho = − 0.27; p 1 (rho = − 0.35; p α = 0.91; ICC = 0.80) were highly adequate, with SEM and MDC95% of 7.91 and 21.3 respectively. Conclusions The JRPD was successfully adapted into Persian and had adequate psychometric properties in terms of content and convergent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. The questionnaire is found useable to assess the CLBP-related biomechanical exposures in Iranian male Army personnel.

To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) into Vietnamese.We followed the guideline by Beaton et al. (20002007). Stage I: two translators (informed and uninformed) translated the questionnaires. Stage II: the translations were synthesised. Stage III: back translation was performed by two translators fluent in both Vietnamese and English but naïve to the outcome measurement. Stage IV: seven experts reached consensus on the pre-final Vietnamese version (BIPQ-V and BMQ-V). Stage V: field test of the questionnaires on 16 twelve-year-old students and 31 Vietnamese patients. In addition, we determined the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the questionnaires in 34 Vietnamese patients with acute coronary syndrome.All experts agreed that there was semantic, idiomatic, experiential and conceptual equivalence between the original and pre-final Vietnamese versions of the BIPQ and BMQ. Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the internal consistency were acceptable for the BMQ-V Specific-Necessity (0.64), BMQ-V Specific-Concerns (0.62) and BMQ-V General-Harm (0.60), with the exception of BMQ-V General-Overuse (0.27). Intra-class correlation coefficients of the test-retest reliability were acceptable for the subscales of BMQ-V (range: 0.77-0.86), and BIPQ-V items (range: 0.62-0.85) with the exception of BIPQ-V 1 (0.44, 95% CI -014 to 0.72) and BIPQ-V 4 (0.57, 95% CI 0.22-0.81).The Vietnamese version of BIPQ and BMQ are reliable tools to assess illness perceptions and beliefs about medicines of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Psychometric properties of these questionnaires should be tested in different patient populations.Traduire en vietnamien et adapter culturellement le Bref Questionnaire sur la Perception de la Maladie (BIPQ) et le Questionnaire sur les Croyances relatives aux Médicaments (BMQ). MÉTHODES: Nous avons suivi les directives de Beaton et al. (2000 et 2007). Etape I: deux traducteurs (informés et non informés) ont traduit les questionnaires. Etape II: les traductions ont été synthétisées. Etape III: une re-traduction a été effectuée par deux traducteurs parlant couramment le vietnamien et l’anglais mais naïfs sur la mesure des résultats. Etape IV: sept experts sont parvenus à un consensus sur la version vietnamienne pré-finale (BIPQ-V et BMQ-V). Etape V: test sur le terrain des questionnaires sur 16 étudiants de 12 ans et 31 patients vietnamiens. En outre, nous avons déterminé la cohérence interne et la fiabilité du test/re-test des questionnaires chez 34 patients vietnamiens atteints de syndrome coronarien aigu. RÉSULTATS: Tous les experts ont convenu qu'il existait une équivalence sémantique, idiomatique, expérientielle et conceptuelle entre les versions originales et pré-finale vietnamiennes du BIPQ et du BMQ. Les coefficients alpha de cohérence interne de Cronbach étaient acceptables pour la nécessité spécifique du BMQ-V (0,64), les préoccupations spécifiques du BMQ-V (0,62) et la nocivité générale du BMQ-V (0,60), à l'exception de la qualité générale du BMQ-V (0,27). Les coefficients de corrélation intra-classe de la fiabilité du test/re-test étaient acceptables pour les sous-échelles de BMQ-V (plage: 0,77-0,86) et les éléments du BIPQ-V (plage: 0,62-0,85) à l'exception du BIPQ-V 1 (0,44; IC95%: −014-0,72) et du BIPQ-V 4 (0,57; IC95%: 0,22-0,81).Les versions vietnamiennes du BIPQ et du BMQ constituent des outils fiables pour évaluer les perceptions relatives à la maladie et les croyances concernant les médicaments destinés aux patients atteints du syndrome coronarien aigu. Les propriétés psychométriques de ces questionnaires doivent être testées dans différentes populations de patients.

Made available in DSpace on 2019-10-03T17:32:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2019. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2019-10-04T16:21:08Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 S2237-60892019005004105.pdf: 138281 bytes, checksum: 82ee0a3bfc7eb2097d959f9248faf11a (MD5) ResumoObjetivoApresentar o processo de adaptação transcultural do Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) para o contexto brasileiro.MétodoA adaptação transcultural envolveu as etapas de tradução independente, versão síntese e retrotradução. A validade de conteúdo foi realizada por um comitê multidisciplinar de especialistas, com avaliação quantitativa dos índices de concordância. Por fim, o pré-teste foi conduzido com a população-alvo.ResultadoTodos os estágios da adaptação transcultural foram seguidos, e na maioria das estruturas avaliadas, os valores de concordância foram satisfatórios (≥ 4.75). Grande parte das sugestões de modificações feitas pelos especialistas foram acatadas, sendo as principais relacionadas a ajustes no tempo e concordância verbal e a inclusão de letras e palavras para permitir a flexão de gênero. No pré-teste nenhuma sugestão foi apresentada e o instrumento foi considerado compreensível.ConclusãoA versão brasileira do PID-5 mostrou-se adequada ao contexto brasileiro sob as perspectivas semântica, idiomática, cultural e conceitual. A versão brasileira avaliada é de uso livre, foi aprovada pelas editoras responsáveis pelos direitos autorais do instrumento e é considerada oficial. Novos estudos estão sendo conduzidos para aprimorar a busca por evidencias de validade e confiabilidade. AbstractObjectiveTo describe the process of cross-cultural adaptation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) to the Brazilian context.MethodCross-cultural adaptation involved the steps of independent translation of the instrument, synthesis version, and back-translation. Analysis of content validity was conducted by a multidisciplinary expert committee and consisted of quantitative assessment of agreement indicators. The test was then applied to a target population.ResultAll the steps required for a cross-cultural adaptation were followed and satisfactory agreement values (≥ 4.75) were reached for most of the structures assessed. Most of the changes suggested by the experts were followed; these changes consisted primarily of adjustments to verb tense and agreement and the inclusion of letters and words to allow gender inflection. In the pre-test, no suggestions were made and the instrument was considered comprehensible.ConclusionThe Brazilian version of the PID-5 was found to be adequate to the Brazilian context from semantic, idiomatic, cultural, and conceptual perspectives. The Brazilian version assessed here can be freely used, was approved by the publishers who hold the copyright on the instrument, and is considered the official version of the instrument. New studies are underway to determine the validity and reliability of the PID-5. Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Departamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Departamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria Faculdade Pio Décimo Universidade Federal de São Carlos Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Departamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria

To cross-culturally adapt the Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) into Portuguese and investigate its psychometric properties in patients with chronic low back pain. Cross-cultural adaptation was carried out according to published guidelines. Along with measures for pain and disability, GPES was administered at baseline, 48-h later and post-intervention. To estimate test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was used. The validity was examined through the correlation between the GPES and the Patient Global Improvement Change Scale and the contribution of baseline status to GPES scores. Responsiveness was assessed by analyzing hypotheses regarding areas under the curve and correlations with changes in other measures. The test-retest reliability, the convergent validity and the contribution of the baseline status to GPES scores were demonstrated. The EPES correlated strongly with global perception of change (r = 0.677), and moderately with pain and disability changes (r = 0.457 and r = 0.452, respectively). Areas under the curve values of 0.71(95% CI = 0.607–0.825) and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.749–922) were found. The GPES demonstrated adequate psychometric properties. This study’s findings supported its use in clinical and research studies with patients with chronic low back pain.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe European Portuguese version of the Global Perceived Effect Scale demonstrated adequate reliability, validity and responsiveness. This instrument is suitable to evaluate meaningful changes in patients with chronic low back pain.The contribution of baseline status to GPES scores was confirmed by specific and recommended methods. The use of the GPES as external criterion of change in clinimetric studies was supported.The minimum important change was 2.5 points out of 11 of the GPES. Only improvements above this point should be considered as relevant to patients with chronic low back pain undergoing physiotherapy. The European Portuguese version of the Global Perceived Effect Scale demonstrated adequate reliability, validity and responsiveness. This instrument is suitable to evaluate meaningful changes in patients with chronic low back pain. The contribution of baseline status to GPES scores was confirmed by specific and recommended methods. The use of the GPES as external criterion of change in clinimetric studies was supported. The minimum important change was 2.5 points out of 11 of the GPES. Only improvements above this point should be considered as relevant to patients with chronic low back pain undergoing physiotherapy.

Objective To follow the guidelines of intercultural adaptation provided by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons’ (AAOS) Evidence-Based Medicine Committee, translating the original scale and evaluating the reliability and validity, and then to compile the Chinese version of the Management of Aggression and Violence Attitude Scale (MAVAS) for nurses in emergency room in the mainland of China. Methods This study consists of two phases of testing: (1) translation: forward translation, synthesis, back translation, expert committee review, and pretesting; (2) psychometric properties: content and construct validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability. Results The Chinese version of MAVAS and the original version showed excellent similarities and equivalence. The average Scale-level Content Validity Index was 0.904, and the Item-level Content Validity Index ranged from 0.80 to 1.00. The construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis by LISREL 8.7; χ2/df of the scale was 4.7810.90, indicating that the scale’s factor structure model fitted better. The internal consistency was satisfactory (scale, Cronbach’s α=0.94; subscales, Cronbach’s α=0.74–0.90), and the test–retest reliability over 2 weeks was good (scale, Pearson’s coefficient=0.996; subscales, Pearson’s coefficient=0.801–0.963). Conclusions The Chinese version of MAVAS had an excellent feasibility. It was found to be a valid and reliable tool to assess nurses’ attitude toward patients’ violence in emergency department.

International audience; Background: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), including obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, is often underestimated because it requires a burdensome test (ie, polysomnography) to ensure diagnosis. To improve polysomnography referral, it is of utmost importance to validate efficient alternative screening tools. This study aimed to provide a translation and a cross-cultural validation of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) into French to obtain an easy-to-use and reliable screening tool. The psychometric properties of the French version were also determined.Methods: The process of cross-cultural adaptation was carried out following these steps: forward-backward translation, evaluation by an expert committee, and pretesting of the pre-final version. Reliability of the French-PSQ version was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficients and Spearman's correlation on a convenient sample of 201 children (aged between 2 and 17 years). Construct validity was determined by factor analysis of principal components.Results: Internal consistency was within an adequate range for all subscales: 0.711 for snoring, 0.559 for sleepiness, 0.682 for behavioral problems, and 0.776 for the whole questionnaire. Spearman's correlation analysis comparing questionnaires administered two weeks apart showed good correlation coefficients for all subscales (snoring: 0.642, sleepiness: 0.846, behavioral problems: 0.780, and entire SRBD scale: 0.835). Factor analysis performed to assess the structure of the French-SRBD scale confirmed the same four factors described in the original questionnaire ("breathing," "behavior," "sleepiness," and "other").Conclusion: The French version of the PSQ has been successfully cross-culturally adapted and showed good psychometric properties, suggesting that it is useful as a tool to screen sleep-disordered breathing in French-speaking children.

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (T-PRWHE) questionnaire for use in the Turkish patient population. Moreover, we aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the T-PRWHE questionnaire. Materials and methods: A total of 166 patients with hand and wrist problems were included in the study. They completed the T-PRWHE, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at baseline and at the 3rd month of the study. Reliability was evaluated by analyzing internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficient) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient). To analyze validity, factor analysis of the T-PRWHE and correlation coefficients between the T-PRWHE, DASH, and SF-36 were obtained.Results: Reliability of the T-PRWHE in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficients for T-PRWHE were found to be 0.85) was excellent. Intraclass correlation coefficients were over 0.90. The T-PRWHE has three factors and the correlations between the T-PRWHE and DASH and SF-36 were statistically significant.Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, the Turkish version of the PRWHE questionnaire was found to be a valid and reliable scale and it is recommended for the evaluation of patient-based pain and disability level in routine clinical practice.

Objective: To assess test–retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA-NL) in patients who sustained acute physical trauma. Design: A longitudinal cohort study. Setting: A level 1 trauma center in The Netherlands. Subjects: Patients who required hospital admission after sustaining an acute physical trauma. Intervention: Patients completed the SMFA-NL at six weeks, eight weeks and six months post-injury. Main measure: The measures used were The Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment. Test–retest reliability (between six and eight weeks post-injury) using intraclass correlation coefficients, the smallest detectable change and Bland and Altman plots. Construct validity (six weeks post-injury) and responsiveness (between six weeks and six months post-injury) were evaluated using the hypothesis testing method. Results: A total of 248 patients (mean age: 46.5, SD: 13.4) participated, 145 patients completed the retest questionnaires (eight weeks) and 160 patients completed the responsiveness questionnaires (six months). The intraclass correlation coefficients indicated good to excellent reliability on all subscales (0.80 to 0.98). The smallest detectable change was 17.4 for the Upper Extremity Dysfunction subscale, 11.0 for the Lower Extremity Dysfunction subscales, 13.9 for the Problems with Daily Activities subscale and 16.5 for the Mental and Emotional Problems subscale. At group level, the smallest detectable change ranged from 1.48 to 1.96. A total of 86% of the construct validity hypotheses and 79% of the responsiveness hypotheses were confirmed. Conclusion: This study showed that the SMFA-NL has good to excellent reliability, sufficient construct validity and is able to detect change in physical function over time.

Resumen El objetivo del presente estudio instrumental fue adaptar y analizar la validez y la fiabilidad de la “Escala de Evaluación del Estado de Crisis” (Crisis State Assessment Scale, CSAS; Lewis, 2005) en una muestra de 648 estudiantes colombianos en formación técnica o universitaria. La traducción y adaptación de la escala se realizó mediante la técnica de doble traducción, la versión en español resultante fue sometida a un estudio instrumental exploratorio con 129 participantes. Se obtuvo un alfa Cronbach total de 0,84 indicando una buena consistencia interna del instrumento adaptado, por lo que se procedió a la fase de validación factorial. El instrumento evalúa los siguientes tres constructos psicológicos: la intensidad del estado de crisis psicológica, la percepción del evento estresante y la percepción de los problemas de afrontamiento. El coeficiente alfa de Cronbach en la muestra de validación fue de .88 (n = 648), indicando una adecuada exactitud en la medida instrumental. El análisis factorial exploratorio de ejes principales con rotación promax arrojó una estructura bifactorial bien definida que explica el 60% de la varianza común. En el análisis factorial confirmatorio, los mejores índices de ajuste entre los datos empíricos y los modelos teóricos probados, corresponde al modelo que postula que existen dos factores de primer orden, Percepción del Evento Estresante “PEE” y Problemas Percibidos de Afrontamiento “PPA”, y que están explicados por un factor emergente de segundo orden que correspondería al constructo del Estado de Crisis “EEEC”. Los datos anteriores soportan una validez de constructo congruente con la teoría transaccional del estrés de Lazarus y Folkman (1984). Las correlaciones de Pearson entre el puntaje total y la “Escalade Estrés Percibido” fue de .70, apoyando la validez concurrente. En conclusión, estos resultados sugieren que la versión adaptada al español de la “Escala de Evaluación del Estado de Crisis” (EEEC) posee propiedades psicométricas satisfactorias para ser utilizada en la población colombiana y que los ítems que la componen son comprendidos sin problemas de adecuación cultural. Abstract The objective of the present instrumental study was to adapt and analyze the validity and reliability of the “Crisis State Assessment Scale” (“CSAS”, Lewis, 2005) in a sample of 648 Colombian students in technical or university training. The translation and adaptation of the scale were done through the translation back technique; the resulting Spanish version was subjected to an exploratory instrumental study with 129 participants. A total Cronbach´s alpha coefficient of 0.84 was obtained, indicating a good internal consistency for the adapted instrument, then we proceeded to the factorial validation phase. The instrument evaluates the following three psychological constructs: the intensity of the psychological crisis state, the perception of the stressful event and the perception of the problems of coping. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in the validation sample was 0.88 (n = 648), indicating adequate accuracy in the instrumental measurement. The exploratory factor analysis of principal axes with promax rotation yielded a well-defined bifactorial structure that explains 60% of the common variance. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the best fit indexes between the empirical data and the theoretical models tested correspond to the model that postulates that there are two factors in first order, Perception of the Stressful Event “PSE” and Perceived Problems in Coping “PPC”, and that they are explained by a second-order emergent factor that corresponds to the construct of the Crisis State “CS”, The above data support a construct validity congruent with the transactional theory of stress of Lazarus and Folkman, (1984). Pearson’s correlations between the total score and the “Perceived Stress Scale” was 0.70, supporting concurrent validity. In conclusion, these results suggest that the adapted to Spanish version of the “Crisis State Assessment Scale” (“CSAS”) has satisfactory psychometric properties to be used in the Colombian population and that the ítems that compose it are understood without problems of cultural adaptation.

Purpose Shared decision-making is currently not widely implemented in breast cancer care. Encounter decision aids support shared decision-making by helping patients and physicians compare treatment options. So far, little was known about adaptation needs for translated encounter decision aids, and encounter decision aids for breast cancer treatments were not available in Germany. This study aimed to adapt and evaluate the implementation of two encounter decision aids on breast cancer treatments in routine care. Methods We conducted a multi-phase qualitative study: (1) translation of two breast cancer Option Grid™ decision aids; comparison to national clinical standards; cognitive interviews to test patients’ understanding; (2) focus groups to assess acceptability; (3) testing in routine care using participant observation. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Physicians and patients reacted positively to the idea of encounter decision aids, and reported being interested in using them; patients were most receptive. Several adaptation cycles were necessary. Uncertainty about feasibility of using encounter decision aids in clinical settings was the main physician-reported barrier. During real-world testing (N = 77 encounters), physicians used encounter decision aids in one-third of potentially relevant encounters. However, they did not use the encounter decision aids to stimulate dialogue, which is contrary to their original scope and purpose. Conclusions The idea of using encounter decision aids was welcomed, but more by patients than by physicians. Adaptation was a complex process and required resources. Clinicians did not follow suggested strategies for using encounter decision aids. Our study indicates that production of encounter decision aids alone will not lead to successful implementation, and has to be accompanied by training of health care providers. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-018-5035-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the questionnaires belonging to the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy-2 (CAPL-2) into Spanish and to explore the reliability for its use in children and adolescents aged from 8 to 12 years. Methods: The CAPL-2 questionnaires were translated using the translation–back-translation methodology into Spanish and adapted to the Spanish context. The test–retest reliability and internal consistency of the CAPL-2 questionnaires of this Spanish version were analysed in 57 schoolchildren from a school in the region of Extremadura (Spain). Results: High internal consistency (α = 0.730 to 0.970) and test–retest reliabilities ranging from moderate to almost perfect in the knowledge and understanding domain (ICC = 0.486 to 0.888); from substantial to almost perfect in the motivation and confidence domain (ICC = 0.720 to 0.981); and almost perfect in the daily activity domain (ICC = 0.975) were found. The test–retest correlation was significantly weak to strong (r = 0.266 to 0.815) in both the motivation and confidence and knowledge and understanding domains, except for the third predilection item and the muscular endurance question. Significant test–retest differences were observed in the first intrinsic motivation item (p = 0.027) and the knowledge and understanding domain total score (p = 0.014). Conclusion: The Spanish version of the CAPL-2 questionnaires, translated and adapted to the context, are reliable measurement tools, serving to complete the full adaptation of the CAPL-2 test battery for use in children aged 8 to 12 years.

(1) Background: The Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) is an English-language questionnaire specifically designed to assess health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with musculoskeletal disorders. This scoring system has been translated into several languages. Given the lack of an Italian version of the PODCI, this study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and assess the psychometric properties of the PODCI score in the Italian pediatric population. (2) Methods: The PODCI questionnaire was culturally adapted to Italian patients in accordance with the literature guidelines. The study included 59 participants from a single orthopedic institution who underwent orthopedic surgery for various skeletal conditions. The questionnaire was administered to participants at multiple time-points (T0, T1, T2). Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. Reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between T0 and T1 assessment. Criterion validity was assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients between PODCI and the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS). Responsiveness was evaluated by the difference between T0 and T2 using the effect size (ES) and the standardized response mean (SRM) calculation. (3) Results: Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable in both the self- and parent-reported versions with values of 0.78 (0.68–0.90) and 0.84 (0.60–0.92), respectively. The ICC fluctuated between 0.31 and 0.89 for self-reported and 0.49 to 0.87 for pediatrics. The Spearman’s r showed a moderate correlation between HSS Pedi-FABS and the “Sport & Physical Functioning” and “Global Functioning” domains. ES and SRM varied from small to moderate across all the domains. (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the Italian version of the PODCI, translated following the international standardized guidelines, is reliable, valid, and responsive in pediatric patients who underwent orthopedic surgery.