Search

Sarophorus bidentatus Frolov & Scholtz, 2003: 187 Type locality: Namaqualand, Kamieskroon [30°12’S 17°56’E, Northern Cape, South Africa]. Distribution: South Africa (Frolov & Scholtz 2003; Davis et al. 2020)., Published as part of Strümpher, Werner P., Daniel, Gimo M. & Davis, Adrian L. V., 2022, Woody plant communities of southern South Africa and new distribution records for the rare dung beetle species Sarophorus punctatus Frolov & Scholtz, 2003 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae), pp. 396-400 in Zootaxa 5188 (4) on page 399, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5188.4.7, http://zenodo.org/record/7095688, {"references":["Frolov, A. V. & Scholtz, C. H. (2003) Revision of the Afrotropical dung beetle genus Sarophorus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). African Entomology, 11, 183 - 198.","Davis, A. L. V., Deschodt, C. M. & Scholtz, C. H. (2020) Conservation assessment of Scarabaeinae dung beetles in South Africa, Botswana and Namibia: IUCN Red List categories, atlas and ecological notes. Suricata 6. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Pretoria, 800 pp. [http: // opus. sanbi. org / handle / 20.500.12143 / 7672]"]}

Strümpher, Werner P., Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian L.V. (2022): Woody plant communities of southern South Africa and new distribution records for the rare dung beetle species Sarophorus punctatus Frolov & Scholtz, 2003 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Zootaxa 5188 (4): 396-400, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5188.4.7

Sarophorus tuberculatus (Laporte de Castelnau, 1840: 88) Type locality: Afrique [Africa]. Distribution: South Africa (Frolov & Scholtz 2003; Davis et al. 2020)., Published as part of Strümpher, Werner P., Daniel, Gimo M. & Davis, Adrian L. V., 2022, Woody plant communities of southern South Africa and new distribution records for the rare dung beetle species Sarophorus punctatus Frolov & Scholtz, 2003 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae), pp. 396-400 in Zootaxa 5188 (4) on page 399, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5188.4.7, http://zenodo.org/record/7095688, {"references":["Frolov, A. V. & Scholtz, C. H. (2003) Revision of the Afrotropical dung beetle genus Sarophorus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). African Entomology, 11, 183 - 198.","Davis, A. L. V., Deschodt, C. M. & Scholtz, C. H. (2020) Conservation assessment of Scarabaeinae dung beetles in South Africa, Botswana and Namibia: IUCN Red List categories, atlas and ecological notes. Suricata 6. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Pretoria, 800 pp. [http: // opus. sanbi. org / handle / 20.500.12143 / 7672]"]}

Sarophorus bidentatus Frolov & Scholtz, 2003: 187 Type locality: Namaqualand, Kamieskroon [30°12’S 17°56’E, Northern Cape, South Africa]. Distribution: South Africa (Frolov & Scholtz 2003; Davis et al. 2020).

Sarophorus frolovi Roets, 2017: 268 Type locality: Midlands, Weza forestry plantations, –30.61680[°] 29.683626[°] (KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa). Distribution: South Africa (Roets et al. 2017; Davis et al. 2020)., Published as part of Strümpher, Werner P., Daniel, Gimo M. & Davis, Adrian L. V., 2022, Woody plant communities of southern South Africa and new distribution records for the rare dung beetle species Sarophorus punctatus Frolov & Scholtz, 2003 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae), pp. 396-400 in Zootaxa 5188 (4) on page 399, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5188.4.7, http://zenodo.org/record/7095688, {"references":["Roets, F., Crous, C. & Pryke, J. (2017) Sarophorus diabolus sp. n. and Sarophorus frolovi sp. n. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from South Africa. African Entomology, 25 (1), 264 - 270. https: // doi. org / 10.4001 / 003.025.0264","Davis, A. L. V., Deschodt, C. M. & Scholtz, C. H. (2020) Conservation assessment of Scarabaeinae dung beetles in South Africa, Botswana and Namibia: IUCN Red List categories, atlas and ecological notes. Suricata 6. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Pretoria, 800 pp. [http: // opus. sanbi. org / handle / 20.500.12143 / 7672]"]}

Sarophorus carinatus Frolov & Scholtz, 2003: 187 Type locality: Lydenburg Distr., Ohrigstad [24°45’S 30°34’E, Mpumalanga, South Africa]. Distribution: South Africa (Frolov & Scholtz 2003; Davis et al. 2020)., Published as part of Strümpher, Werner P., Daniel, Gimo M. & Davis, Adrian L. V., 2022, Woody plant communities of southern South Africa and new distribution records for the rare dung beetle species Sarophorus punctatus Frolov & Scholtz, 2003 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae), pp. 396-400 in Zootaxa 5188 (4) on page 399, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5188.4.7, http://zenodo.org/record/7095688, {"references":["Frolov, A. V. & Scholtz, C. H. (2003) Revision of the Afrotropical dung beetle genus Sarophorus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). African Entomology, 11, 183 - 198.","Davis, A. L. V., Deschodt, C. M. & Scholtz, C. H. (2020) Conservation assessment of Scarabaeinae dung beetles in South Africa, Botswana and Namibia: IUCN Red List categories, atlas and ecological notes. Suricata 6. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Pretoria, 800 pp. [http: // opus. sanbi. org / handle / 20.500.12143 / 7672]"]}

Sarophorus diabolus Roets, 2017: 266 Type locality: Riebeeck-Kasteel, Porseleinberg, –33.45995[°], 18.88627[°] (Western Cape, South Africa). Distribution: South Africa (Roets et al. 2017; Davis et al. 2020)., Published as part of Strümpher, Werner P., Daniel, Gimo M. & Davis, Adrian L. V., 2022, Woody plant communities of southern South Africa and new distribution records for the rare dung beetle species Sarophorus punctatus Frolov & Scholtz, 2003 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae), pp. 396-400 in Zootaxa 5188 (4) on page 399, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5188.4.7, http://zenodo.org/record/7095688, {"references":["Roets, F., Crous, C. & Pryke, J. (2017) Sarophorus diabolus sp. n. and Sarophorus frolovi sp. n. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from South Africa. African Entomology, 25 (1), 264 - 270. https: // doi. org / 10.4001 / 003.025.0264","Davis, A. L. V., Deschodt, C. M. & Scholtz, C. H. (2020) Conservation assessment of Scarabaeinae dung beetles in South Africa, Botswana and Namibia: IUCN Red List categories, atlas and ecological notes. Suricata 6. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Pretoria, 800 pp. [http: // opus. sanbi. org / handle / 20.500.12143 / 7672]"]}

Genus Silvaphilus Roets & Oberlander, 2010 Type species: Silvaphilus oubosiensis Roets & Oberlander, 2010, by original designation. Silvaphilus Roets & Oberlander, 2010: 369; Davis et al. 2019: 139; Davis et al. 2020: 159., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Str��mpher, Werner P. & Deschodt, Christian M., 2022, An unexpected new flightless dung beetle species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Endroedyolini) from the Cederberg Mountains, South Africa, pp. 414-420 in Zootaxa 5093 (4) on page 415, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5093.4.2, http://zenodo.org/record/5912678, {"references":["Roets, F. & Oberlander, K. C. (2010) Silvaphilus: A new relict forest-endemic Canthonini dung beetle genus from the Western Cape Province of South Africa (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). African Entomology, 18, 369 - 373. https: // doi. org / 10.4001 / 003.018.0213","Davis, A. L. V., Deschodt, C. M. & Scholtz, C. H. (2019) Defining new dung beetle tribes to resolve discrepancies between phylogeny and tribal classification in the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Zootaxa, 4608 (1), 131 - 144. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4608.1.7","Davis, A. L. V., Deschodt, C. M. & Scholtz, C. H. (2020) Conservation assessment of Scarabaeine dung beetles in South Africa, Botswana and Namibia: IUCN Red List categories, atlas and ecological notes. Suricata 6. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, 800 pp."]}

Silvaphilus joselmae Daniel, Str��mpher & Deschodt, new species (Figs 1A���F, 2���3) Nomenclatural act: LSIDurn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: F290EEB4-901D-4A68-AD23-6F35EF90E7AC Type locality. 4 km SE of Algeria Forest Station (32��24���30���S 19��05���03���E), Cederberg Wilderness Area, Western Cape Province, South Africa (Figs 2���3). Type material. HOLOTYPE, ♂ (TMSA) (Figs 1A���F): ��� SOUTH AFRICA: Western Cape Prov., | Cederberg Wilderness Area, | 4 km SE of Algeria Forest Station,��� || ��� 7-9.viii.2021, altitude 790 m, | 32��24���30���S 19��05���03���E, | GM Daniel & WP Str��mpher��� || " SITE IV: 790 m, Shaded vegetation, | near stream, pitfall trap | baited with pig dung.��� || ��� HOLOTYPE | Silvaphilus joselmae | Daniel, Str��mpher & | Deschodt, 2021 [red cardstock]���. PARATYPES, 10♂♂, 18♀♀ (BMSA 4♂ 6♀; TMSA 5♂ 9♀; SANC 1♂; 3♀♀); same collection data as holotype. Description of holotype ( ♂). Size: Length: 3.4 mm. Width: 1.7 mm. Colour (Figs 1A���B): Black; mouthparts and antenna yellowish. Body surface covered with recurved tan setae. Body shape (Fig. 1A): Round (in dorsal view) and strongly convex (in lateral view). Head (Figs 1A���B): Rounded, surface densely and coarsely punctate with few scattered tan setae. Clypeus broadly rounded, somewhat depressed anterolaterally. Anterior clypeal margin bidentate; edge between denticles broadly W-shaped with small triangular medial denticle present; lateral clypeal margin continuous; fronto-clypeal suture indistinct. Clypeo-genal margin continuously rounded. Dorsal part of eyes elongated and curved. Antennae with nine antennomeres; mouthparts with few setae. Pronotum (Fig. 1A): Strongly convex, wider than long, coarsely punctate, some punctures bearing recurved tan setae; basal margin with single clear line of uniform elliptical punctures arranged in parallel; basal margin wider than apical; lateral margin somewhat explanate. Elytra (Figs 1A, D): Strongly convex, fused, with nine striae. Striae 1���7 formed by continuous row of double semi-circles; stria 8 with a carina on either side, modified as deep and obvious groove; stria 9 adjacent to epipleuron. Epipleuron surface smooth, well-defined, wider basally and narrower apically. Elytral interstriae with single row of recurved tan setae paralleling outer edge of each interval; seta spaced every four or five punctures. Medial edges impunctate; interstriae surface densely punctate on first basal half, while on second apical half punctate only on lateral edges. Elytral humerus and apical callosity absent. Metathoracic wings absent. Prosternum and propleuron (Fig. 1B): Surface dull, with few irregular sets of ocellate punctures. Ventrites (Fig. 1B): Mesepimere with few punctures; surface dull. Mesoventrite with surface shining; virtually glabrous; punctures almost touching and about twice larger than those on the metaventrite. Mesometaventral suture very slightly curving anteriorly. Metaventrite surface shining; surface completely punctate with punctures separated by almost one puncture diameter, glabrous anteriorly, setose posteriorly. Six abdominal ventrites visible, punctate laterally, last abdominal ventrite twice wider than others with single row of recurved setae. Pygidium (Fig. 1C): About twice as wide as high, surface shagreened with punctures, lateral edges with few punctures, each bearing tan seta. Complete and strongly marginate, marginal bead obtusely angulate at basal midline. Legs (Figs 1A���B): Profemora ventrally punctate, with some punctures bearing seta, surface micro-shagreened, shining; upper anterior and posterior edges strongly marginate; lower anterior edge weakly marginate; distinct pit on trochanterofemoral segments present. Protibiae, slender basally and stouter apically, truncate apically with three prominent teeth on outer margin; entire margin distinctly serrated, area between teeth serrate; apical tooth largest, medial tooth somewhat smaller than basal one. In dorsal view, a row of six-aligned setae running parallel to outer margin visible; outer margin carina present, extending from basal edge of tibia to basal tooth. In ventral view, median row of seven-aligned setae running in between inner and outer margin; shallowly carinate on basal half of outer margin. Protibial spur present. Protarsi with four visible tarsomeres and tiny pair of claws; protarsomeres 1���3 triangular and short; protarsomere 4 cylindrical at least twice longer than others, with pair of tiny apical claws. Meso- and metafemora ventrally sparsely, finely punctate hind edges, punctures bearing setae, surfaces microreticulate, shiny; anterior and posterior edges marginate. Meso- and metatibiae flattened, gradually expanded nearly to apex, with prominent spur on inner margin. Meso- and metatarsomeres with five tarsomeres, protarsomeres 1���4 triangular, short, covered with few stiff setae; protarsomere 5 cylindrical at least twice longer than others, with pair of very tiny apical claws. Aedeagus (Fig. 1E): Symmetrical, parameres with the apex tapered and inwardly curving. Morphological variation: Length: 3.3���3.8 mm. Width: 1.6���1. 9 mm. There is no clear sexual dimorphism, but females are slightly larger than males. Diagnosis: Silvaphilus joselmae new species can be distinguished from S. oubosiensis by the following combination of characters: males of the new species lack the lateral elytral spine which is present in males of S. oubosiensis. Silvaphilus oubosiensis shows a pronotal depression on the basal-medial edge, which is not present in the new species. Silvaphilus joselmae new species is much smaller in size than S. oubosiensis; in the former the medial width of its mesoventrite is twice wider and with two rows of punctures, in the latter the mesoventrite is narrower and with one row of punctures. Furthermore, the mesometaventral suture curves very slightly anteriorly in the new species, whereas it is rounded in S. oubosiensis. Lastly, the eighth stria in S. joselmae new species is modified to form a deep and obvious groove, but in S. oubosiensis it is formed of deep and clear elongated and connected punctures. Etymology: The new species is named after Joselma G. Pereira, the wife of the first author, Gimo M. Daniel, for her unconditional love and support in his entomological career. Distribution (Figs 2���3): Silvaphilus joselmae new species is known from a single locality in the Cederberg Mountains where it was recorded in Fynbos riparian vegetation (Aza 1; Mucina & Rutherford 2006) (Fig. 3). In the Cederberg area there are less than ten severely fragmented patches of the Fynbos riparian vegetation covering a total area of less than 50 km 2. Although the vegetation unit is well protected in the Cederberg Wilderness Area dedicated collecting in the area is required to determine if this species occurs in any of the other patches of riparian scrub vegetation or if it exhibits broader vegetation specialisation., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Str��mpher, Werner P. & Deschodt, Christian M., 2022, An unexpected new flightless dung beetle species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Endroedyolini) from the Cederberg Mountains, South Africa, pp. 414-420 in Zootaxa 5093 (4) on pages 415-417, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5093.4.2, http://zenodo.org/record/5912678, {"references":["Mucina, L. & Rutherford, M. C. (Eds.) (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzi. Vol. 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, 807 pp."]}

Identification key to Endroedyolini, adapted and modified from Deschodt et al. (2020). 1. Metaventrite anteriorly with deep fovea on each side of midline, pronotal disc on each side near posterior angle with short elevated carina................................................ Endroedyolus paradoxus Scholtz & Howden, 1987 - Metaventrite anteriorly without deep fovea on each side of midline, and pronotal disc with or without short elevated carina on each side near posterior angle........................................................................... 2 2. Pronotal disc with short elevated carina on each side near posterior angle................................................................................................... Aliuscanthoniola similaris Deschodt & Scholtz, 2008 - Pronotal disc without short, elevated carina on each side near posterior angle...................................... 3 3. Mesoventrite medially wide, or wide enough for, more than three irregular rows of punctures......................... 4 - Mesoventrite medially narrow, with at most two irregular rows of punctures (punctures sometimes absent in this area)..... 5 4. Mesometaventral suture angulate at anterior apex.................. Outenikwanus tomentosus Scholtz & Howden, 1987 - Mesometaventral suture rounded at anterior apex...................... Upsa centennial Deschodt, Sole & Scholtz, 2020 5. Elytron in lateral view with depression on lateral side......................................................... 6 - Elytron in lateral view without depression on posterolateral side................................................. 7 6. Pronotal depression on mid-basal edge present, mesometaventral suture rounded; lateral elytral spine in males present.................................................................. Silvaphilus oubosiensis Roets & Oberlander 2010 - Pronotal depression on mid-basal edge absent, mesometaventral suture curving very slightly anteriorly; lateral elytral spine in males absent....................................... Silvaphilus joselmae Daniel, Strümpher & Deschodt new species 7. Mesometaventral suture rounded at anterior apex............................................................ 8 - Mesometaventral suture angulate at anterior apex........................................................... 10 8. Protibial teeth 2 and 3 small, almost half the size of protibial tooth 1........... Peckolus parvus Scholtz & Howden, 1987 - Protibial teeth 2 and 3 minute, much less than half the size of protibial tooth 1..................................... 9 9. The recurved setae on the body almost half the length of the straight setae...... Peckolus alpinus Howden & Scholtz, 1988 - The recurved setae on the body barely discernible..................... Peckolus poenskopius Deschodt & Scholtz, 2008 10. Lateral part of mesometaventral suture (between mesocoxae) converging anteriorly........................................................................................... Parvuhowdenius harrisoni Deschodt & Scholtz, 2008 - Lateral part of mesometaventral suture (between mesocoxae) parallel........................................... 11 11. Punctures on mesoventrite large and clear, separated by less than one puncture diameter.......................................................................................... Nebulasilvius insularis Deschodt & Scholtz, 2008 - Punctures on mesoventrite small and separated by at least one puncture diameter.................................................................................................. Nebulasilvius johani Deschodt & Scholtz, 2008

Identification key to Endroedyolini, adapted and modified from Deschodt et al. (2020). 1. Metaventrite anteriorly with deep fovea on each side of midline, pronotal disc on each side near posterior angle with short elevated carina................................................ Endroedyolus paradoxus Scholtz & Howden, 1987 - Metaventrite anteriorly without deep fovea on each side of midline, and pronotal disc with or without short elevated carina on each side near posterior angle........................................................................... 2 2. Pronotal disc with short elevated carina on each side near posterior angle................................................................................................... Aliuscanthoniola similaris Deschodt & Scholtz, 2008 - Pronotal disc without short, elevated carina on each side near posterior angle...................................... 3 3. Mesoventrite medially wide, or wide enough for, more than three irregular rows of punctures......................... 4 - Mesoventrite medially narrow, with at most two irregular rows of punctures (punctures sometimes absent in this area)..... 5 4. Mesometaventral suture angulate at anterior apex.................. Outenikwanus tomentosus Scholtz & Howden, 1987 - Mesometaventral suture rounded at anterior apex...................... Upsa centennial Deschodt, Sole & Scholtz, 2020 5. Elytron in lateral view with depression on lateral side......................................................... 6 - Elytron in lateral view without depression on posterolateral side................................................. 7 6. Pronotal depression on mid-basal edge present, mesometaventral suture rounded; lateral elytral spine in males present.................................................................. Silvaphilus oubosiensis Roets & Oberlander 2010 - Pronotal depression on mid-basal edge absent, mesometaventral suture curving very slightly anteriorly; lateral elytral spine in males absent....................................... Silvaphilus joselmae Daniel, Str��mpher & Deschodt new species 7. Mesometaventral suture rounded at anterior apex............................................................ 8 - Mesometaventral suture angulate at anterior apex........................................................... 10 8. Protibial teeth 2 and 3 small, almost half the size of protibial tooth 1........... Peckolus parvus Scholtz & Howden, 1987 - Protibial teeth 2 and 3 minute, much less than half the size of protibial tooth 1..................................... 9 9. The recurved setae on the body almost half the length of the straight setae...... Peckolus alpinus Howden & Scholtz, 1988 - The recurved setae on the body barely discernible..................... Peckolus poenskopius Deschodt & Scholtz, 2008 10. Lateral part of mesometaventral suture (between mesocoxae) converging anteriorly........................................................................................... Parvuhowdenius harrisoni Deschodt & Scholtz, 2008 - Lateral part of mesometaventral suture (between mesocoxae) parallel........................................... 11 11. Punctures on mesoventrite large and clear, separated by less than one puncture diameter.......................................................................................... Nebulasilvius insularis Deschodt & Scholtz, 2008 - Punctures on mesoventrite small and separated by at least one puncture diameter.................................................................................................. Nebulasilvius johani Deschodt & Scholtz, 2008, Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Str��mpher, Werner P. & Deschodt, Christian M., 2022, An unexpected new flightless dung beetle species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Endroedyolini) from the Cederberg Mountains, South Africa, pp. 414-420 in Zootaxa 5093 (4) on page 419, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5093.4.2, http://zenodo.org/record/5912678, {"references":["Deschodt, C. M., Sole, C. L. & Scholtz, C. H. (2020) Upsa centennial, a new genus and species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Endroedyolini) from the Southern Mistbelt forest in South Africa: celebrating 100 years of entomology at the University of Pretoria. Zootaxa 4728, 357 - 362. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4728.3.4","Scholtz, C. H. & Howden, H. F. (1987) A revision of the African Cathonina (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa, 50, 75 - 119.","Deschodt, C. M. & Scholtz, C. H. (2008) Systematics of South African forest-endemic dung beetles: new genera and species of small Canthonini (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). African Entomology 16, 91 - 106. https: // doi. org / 10.4001 / 1021 - 3589 - 16.1.91","Roets, F. & Oberlander, K. C. (2010) Silvaphilus: A new relict forest-endemic Canthonini dung beetle genus from the Western Cape Province of South Africa (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). African Entomology, 18, 369 - 373. https: // doi. org / 10.4001 / 003.018.0213","Howden, H. & Scholtz, C. H. (1988) A second species of the African genus Peckolus Scholtz & Howden (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeini). Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 51, 133 - 136."]}

Daniel, Gimo M., Strümpher, Werner P., Deschodt, Christian M. (2022): An unexpected new flightless dung beetle species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Endroedyolini) from the Cederberg Mountains, South Africa. Zootaxa 5093 (4): 414-420, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5093.4.2

Genus Silvaphilus Roets & Oberlander, 2010 Type species: Silvaphilus oubosiensis Roets & Oberlander, 2010, by original designation. Silvaphilus Roets & Oberlander, 2010: 369; Davis et al. 2019: 139; Davis et al. 2020: 159.

Silvaphilus joselmae Daniel, Strümpher & Deschodt, new species (Figs 1A–F, 2–3) Nomenclatural act: LSIDurn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: F290EEB4-901D-4A68-AD23-6F35EF90E7AC Type locality. 4 km SE of Algeria Forest Station (32°24′30″S 19°05′03″E), Cederberg Wilderness Area, Western Cape Province, South Africa (Figs 2–3). Type material. HOLOTYPE, ♂ (TMSA) (Figs 1A–F): “ SOUTH AFRICA: Western Cape Prov., | Cederberg Wilderness Area, | 4 km SE of Algeria Forest Station,” || “ 7-9.viii.2021, altitude 790 m, | 32°24′30″S 19°05′03″E, | GM Daniel & WP Strümpher” || " SITE IV: 790 m, Shaded vegetation, | near stream, pitfall trap | baited with pig dung.” || “ HOLOTYPE | Silvaphilus joselmae | Daniel, Strümpher & | Deschodt, 2021 [red cardstock]”. PARATYPES, 10♂♂, 18♀♀ (BMSA 4♂ 6♀; TMSA 5♂ 9♀; SANC 1♂; 3♀♀); same collection data as holotype. Description of holotype ( ♂). Size: Length: 3.4 mm. Width: 1.7 mm. Colour (Figs 1A–B): Black; mouthparts and antenna yellowish. Body surface covered with recurved tan setae. Body shape (Fig. 1A): Round (in dorsal view) and strongly convex (in lateral view). Head (Figs 1A–B): Rounded, surface densely and coarsely punctate with few scattered tan setae. Clypeus broadly rounded, somewhat depressed anterolaterally. Anterior clypeal margin bidentate; edge between denticles broadly W-shaped with small triangular medial denticle present; lateral clypeal margin continuous; fronto-clypeal suture indistinct. Clypeo-genal margin continuously rounded. Dorsal part of eyes elongated and curved. Antennae with nine antennomeres; mouthparts with few setae. Pronotum (Fig. 1A): Strongly convex, wider than long, coarsely punctate, some punctures bearing recurved tan setae; basal margin with single clear line of uniform elliptical punctures arranged in parallel; basal margin wider than apical; lateral margin somewhat explanate. Elytra (Figs 1A, D): Strongly convex, fused, with nine striae. Striae 1–7 formed by continuous row of double semi-circles; stria 8 with a carina on either side, modified as deep and obvious groove; stria 9 adjacent to epipleuron. Epipleuron surface smooth, well-defined, wider basally and narrower apically. Elytral interstriae with single row of recurved tan setae paralleling outer edge of each interval; seta spaced every four or five punctures. Medial edges impunctate; interstriae surface densely punctate on first basal half, while on second apical half punctate only on lateral edges. Elytral humerus and apical callosity absent. Metathoracic wings absent. Prosternum and propleuron (Fig. 1B): Surface dull, with few irregular sets of ocellate punctures. Ventrites (Fig. 1B): Mesepimere with few punctures; surface dull. Mesoventrite with surface shining; virtually glabrous; punctures almost touching and about twice larger than those on the metaventrite. Mesometaventral suture very slightly curving anteriorly. Metaventrite surface shining; surface completely punctate with punctures separated by almost one puncture diameter, glabrous anteriorly, setose posteriorly. Six abdominal ventrites visible, punctate laterally, last abdominal ventrite twice wider than others with single row of recurved setae. Pygidium (Fig. 1C): About twice as wide as high, surface shagreened with punctures, lateral edges with few punctures, each bearing tan seta. Complete and strongly marginate, marginal bead obtusely angulate at basal midline. Legs (Figs 1A–B): Profemora ventrally punctate, with some punctures bearing seta, surface micro-shagreened, shining; upper anterior and posterior edges strongly marginate; lower anterior edge weakly marginate; distinct pit on trochanterofemoral segments present. Protibiae, slender basally and stouter apically, truncate apically with three prominent teeth on outer margin; entire margin distinctly serrated, area between teeth serrate; apical tooth largest, medial tooth somewhat smaller than basal one. In dorsal view, a row of six-aligned setae running parallel to outer margin visible; outer margin carina present, extending from basal edge of tibia to basal tooth. In ventral view, median row of seven-aligned setae running in between inner and outer margin; shallowly carinate on basal half of outer margin. Protibial spur present. Protarsi with four visible tarsomeres and tiny pair of claws; protarsomeres 1–3 triangular and short; protarsomere 4 cylindrical at least twice longer than others, with pair of tiny apical claws. Meso- and metafemora ventrally sparsely, finely punctate hind edges, punctures bearing setae, surfaces microreticulate, shiny; anterior and posterior edges marginate. Meso- and metatibiae flattened, gradually expanded nearly to apex, with prominent spur on inner margin. Meso- and metatarsomeres with five tarsomeres, protarsomeres 1–4 triangular, short, covered with few stiff setae; protarsomere 5 cylindrical at least twice longer than others, with pair of very tiny apical claws. Aedeagus (Fig. 1E): Symmetrical, parameres with the apex tapered and inwardly curving. Morphological variation: Length: 3.3–3.8 mm. Width: 1.6–1. 9 mm. There is no clear sexual dimorphism, but females are slightly larger than males. Diagnosis: Silvaphilus joselmae new species can be distinguished from S. oubosiensis by the following combination of characters: males of the new species lack the lateral elytral spine which is present in males of S. oubosiensis. Silvaphilus oubosiensis shows a pronotal depression on the basal-medial edge, which is not present in the new species. Silvaphilus joselmae new species is much smaller in size than S. oubosiensis; in the former the medial width of its mesoventrite is twice wider and with two rows of punctures, in the latter the mesoventrite is narrower and with one row of punctures. Furthermore, the mesometaventral suture curves very slightly anteriorly in the new species, whereas it is rounded in S. oubosiensis. Lastly, the eighth stria in S. joselmae new species is modified to form a deep and obvious groove, but in S. oubosiensis it is formed of deep and clear elongated and connected punctures. Etymology: The new species is named after Joselma G. Pereira, the wife of the first author, Gimo M. Daniel, for her unconditional love and support in his entomological career. Distribution (Figs 2–3): Silvaphilus joselmae new species is known from a single locality in the Cederberg Mountains where it was recorded in Fynbos riparian vegetation (Aza 1; Mucina & Rutherford 2006) (Fig. 3). In the Cederberg area there are less than ten severely fragmented patches of the Fynbos riparian vegetation covering a total area of less than 50 km 2. Although the vegetation unit is well protected in the Cederberg Wilderness Area dedicated collecting in the area is required to determine if this species occurs in any of the other patches of riparian scrub vegetation or if it exhibits broader vegetation specialisation.

Daniel, Gimo M., Strümpher, Werner P., Snäll, Stanislav (2022): ERRATUM A new species and new distributional records of Haroldius Boucomont, 1914 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from southern Africa. Zootaxa 5091 (4): 600-600, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5091.4.9

Haroldius lyleae Daniel, Str��mpher & Sn��ll, new species (Figs 1���13, 15) Type locality: Soetvlakte Farm [26��45���S 22��50���E], Northern Cape Province, South Africa (Fig. 15). Type material. HOLOTYPE (♂, TMSA, aedeagus extracted) (Figs 1���9): ��� S.Af. [South Africa]; Northern Cape [Province] | Soetvlakte Farm, 1027m | 26[��].45[�����]S ��� 22[��].50[���]E��� || ���17-19.2[February].2010; E-Y: 3873 | pitfall;Vaalbos in grassl [grassland] | leg. Robin Lyle ��� || ��� HOLOTYPE | Haroldius lyleae | Daniel, Str��mpher & | Sn��ll 2021 (red cardstock)���. PARATYPE (female, ESRC; https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/20160703) (Figs 10���13): ��� RSA: Gauteng pr [Province] | Springs 2.IX.2006 | 26��14���30���S, 28��30���22���E | Stanislav Sn��ll leg.��� || ��� PARATYPE | Haroldius lyleae | Daniel, Str��mpher & | Sn��ll, 2021 (red cardstock)���., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Str��mpher, Werner P. & Sn��ll, Stanislav, 2021, A new species and new distributional records of Haroldius Boucomont, 1914 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from southern Africa, pp. 34-42 in Zootaxa 5072 (1) on page 35, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/5728961

Genus Haroldius Boucomont, 1914 Haroldius Boucomont, 1914: 253. Type species: Haroldius rugatulus Boucomont, 1914, by subsequent designation (Arrow 1931: 413). = Cyclotrogus Wasmann, 1918: 2. Type species: Cyclotrogus heimi Wasmann, 1918, by original designation. Synonymised by Arrow (1931: 413). = Ponerotrogus Silvestri, 1924: 583. Type species: Ponerotrogus annandalei Silvestri, 1924, by original designation. Synonymised by Paulian (1985: 197). = Afroharoldius Janssens, 1949: 183. Type species: Afroharoldius ennearthrus Janssens, 1949, by original designation. Synonymised by Paulian (1985: 196). = Formicdubius Philips & Scholtz, 2000: 227. Type species: Formicdubius convexus Philips & Scholtz, 2000, by original designation. Synonymised by Krell & Philips (2010: 44)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Str��mpher, Werner P. & Sn��ll, Stanislav, 2021, A new species and new distributional records of Haroldius Boucomont, 1914 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from southern Africa, pp. 34-42 in Zootaxa 5072 (1) on page 35, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/5728961, {"references":["Arrow, G. J. (1931) The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, Coleoptera, Lamellicornia. Part III. (Coprinae).","Wasmann, E. (1918) Myrmecophile und termitophile Coleopteren aus Ostindien, hauptsachlich gesammelt von P. J. Assmuth S. J. II. Scarabaeidae. Wiener Entomologische Zeitung, 37, 1 - 33.","Silvestri, F. (1924) Description of a new genus of myrmecophilous Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera) of India. Records of the Indian Museum, 26, 583 - 586.","Paulian, R. (1985) Notes sur les coleopteres Scarabaeidae du Museum de Geneve. II. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 92, 189 - 193.","Philips, T. K & Scholtz, C. H. (2000) A new genus and species of trichome-bearing dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from South Africa. African Entomology, 8, 227 - 231.","Krell, F-T. & Philips, T. K (2010) Formicdubius Philips & Scholtz from South Africa,"]}

Stiptopodius muellerae Daniel & Deschodt, new species (Figs. 1C, 2 A���B, 3A, 3C, 4) Type locality: Caconda, Huila, Angola. Type material. Holotype, male: Angola, Huila Prov. | 75 km S Kacopnda [Caconda] | 13.24 S ��� 15. 28 E || 8.11.2011;E-Y: 3916 | sandy forest, 1643m | leg. Ruth M��ller || TM SOUTH AFRICA | TMSC13817 || HOLOTYPE: Stiptopodius | muellerae Daniel & Deschodt | 2020 (printed on red card) (TMSA). Description. Holotype, male. Length: 7.6 mm, width: 3.8 mm. Colour. Black. Head. Incision between medial clypeal teeth deeply concave, lateral clypeal edges not sinuate; external protrusion of genae sharply triangular; surface of head with green sheen; punctation varying from fine to large; setae well-developed except on glabrous anterior clypeal edge; clypeo-frontal carina visible; clypeo-genal suture present; vertex with small medial carina. Antennae with eight antennomeres; labium bears a few well-developed setae. Pronotum. Convex, wider than long; base of pronotum marginate; anterior margin wider than posterior; in lateral view, lateral edge strongly sinuate before postero-lateral angles, surface with green metallic sheen, ocellate punctation varying from fine to large, each side with small longitudinal tubercle; well-developed setae, except on glabrous central disc. Elytra. Lateral margin straight, somewhat convex distally and concave proximally, well-developed humeral umbone; striae sparsely and finely punctate. Interstriae punctate, fully setose. Pygidium. Convex and setose, punctation ocellate. Abdominal ventrites. Prosternum surface with well-developed setae, anterior angles of prosternum slanted forward and inward. Meso- and metaventrite dull, setose and densely punctate; metaventrite with long setae, surface impressed longitudinally at middle. Abdominal ventrites with ocellate punctures and strong setae arranged in rows laterally, glabrous medially; last abdominal ventrite narrowed medially (male character). Legs. Profemora sparsely punctate, bearing well-developed setae, external edge strongly marginate, internal margin slightly marginate. Meso- and metafemora with external and internal edges sparsely setigerous and punctate; surface between external and internal margin with few setigerous punctures, strongly marginate in both edges (external and internal). Protibiae crenulate with four teeth on external margin, line of setae around teeth in dorsal view; in ventral view, with two carinae, internally punctate and pilose. Protibial spur long and inward curving. Meso- and metatibiae triangular and strongly widened apically. Protarsi with five tarsomeres and clearly visible pair of claws; fifth protarsomere at least 2x longer than others (each individually). Meso- and metatarsomeres I���IV triangular, longer than wide, with internal line of strong setae on tarsomere I, strongly concave medially, bilobate distally, external lobe strong, internal lobe weak; tarsomere V rectangular and longer than others, followed by pair of very tiny apical claws. Aedeagus. Parameres symmetrical, elongate with tips acute (Figs. 2 A���B). Female. Unknown Distribution. The species is only known from the type locality, Caconda, Province of Huila, Angola. It was hand collected in sandy forest. Etymology. The specific name honours Ruth M��ller, a friend and curator in charge of Coleoptera at the Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, Gauteng, Pretoria, South Africa, who collected the holotype. Diagnosis. The new species is somewhat similar to S. singularis by having the basal half of the pronotal disc glabrous and frontal carina obsolete. However, S. singularis bears uniform punctation on the pronotum, with a brown metallic sheen, whereas S. muellerae new species has a distinctive green metallic sheen with punctures of variable sizes ranging from fine to large. The elytra of this new species are fully setose, while those of S. singularis are slightly setose posteriorly and glabrous anteriorly. The mesotibiae are sinuate externally in S. muellerae new species but not in S. singularis. The male genitalia differ between the two species by having the tips of the parameres sharp and projecting forward in the new species (Figs. 2 A-B), whereas in S. singularis they are short and blunt (Figs. 2 E-F). S. muellerae new species is also much larger than S. singularis. Remarks. This is the first record of a Stiptopodius species whose meso- and metatarsomeres I���IV are longer than wide (Figs. 3A, C). The first tarsomere is the longest, which is in contrast to the other 5-articulated species, where tarsomere V is longer than others. Furthermore, in S muellerae new species, meso- and metatarsomeres I���IV bear a weak lobe externally. Conservation status and potential threats. The forest at the type locality is surrounded by lands supporting agricultural and pastoral farming activities (R. M��ller, personal communication). It is therefore probably under severe pressure. As this species is only known from this locality, it may warrant the threat category of at least Vulnerable., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Deschodt, Christian M., Davis, Adrian L. V. & Sole, Catherine L., 2020, The enigmatic dung beetle genus Stiptopodius Harold, 1871 (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) revisited: new species descriptions from southern Africa, pp. 394-404 in Zootaxa 4763 (3) on pages 400-402, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4763.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/3759527, {"references":["Harold, E. von (1871) Verzeichniss der von Dr Beccari in Bogos gesammelten Coprophagen Lamellicornien. Coleopterologische Hefte, 8, 1 - 28. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / mmnd. 47918710229","Peringuey, L. (1901) Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa (Lucanidae and Scarabaeidae). Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society, 12, 1 - 920. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 21560382.1901.9525977"]}

Identification key to Stiptopodius species modified from Branco (2009) 1 Sides of pronotum (lateral view) weakly sinuate before postero-lateral angle (S. doriae species group).................. 2 ��� Sides of pronotum (lateral view) strongly sinuate before postero-lateral angle (S. singularis species group).............. 4 2 Body elongate, parallel-sided. Pronotum quadrate, much shorter than elytra. Head with two oblique tubercles on the vertex, often obsolete. Length 3.9 - 5.7 mm. Ethiopia, Somalia, Kenya, Sudan, Uganda, Chad, Niger, Nigeria, Mali, Burkina Faso........................................................................... Stiptopodius doriae Harold, 1871 ��� Body short and wide. Pronotum with sides arcuate, only slightly shorter than elytra Head with two transversely-aligned weak tubercles on vertex.................................................................................... 3 3 Pronotal disc brown with metallic sheen. Meso- and metatarsi with five tarsomeres and apical pair of claws, meso- and metatarsomeres I to IV triangular and wider than long. (male; female unknown). Length 4.0 mm. South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal, Richards Bay)........................................... Stiptopodius peringueyi Daniel & Deschodt, new species ��� Pronotal disc dull. Meso- and metatarsi clawless with three tarsomeres, meso and metatarsomeres I and II much longer than wide, tarsomere III small and not bilobate. Length 4.5���5.2 mm. Kenya, Tanzania.... Stiptopodius longipedis Branco, 1991 4 Head with two clearly separated tubercles on vertex. Clypeo-frontal carina present................................. 5 ��� Head with carina on vertex, entire or slightly interrupted in the middle, but never divided into two separated small tubercles. Clypeo-frontal carina absent............................................................................ 6 5 Cephalic tubercles approximately equidistant from each other and the inner edge of eyes; space between tubercles flat or very slightly depressed. Length 5.4���7.6 mm. Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania..................................................................................................... Stiptopodius patrizii Boucomont, 1923 ��� Cephalic tubercles much closer to inner edge of eyes than to each other; space between tubercles strongly depressed (male; female unknown). Length 7.3 mm. Kenya...................................... Stiptopodius krausei Branco, 1991 6 Clypeal surface not granular, punctation varies from small, simple punctures to large and ocellate..................... 7 ��� Clypeal surface at least partly granular and punctate........................................................ 12 7 Second elytral interstria with punctation aligned alongside the striae, middle of interstria apunctate. Head and pronotum of metallic colour or with a metallic sheen................................................................... 8 ��� Second elytral interstria with punctation irregularly distributed over entire surface. Head and pronotum black or brown, without metallic sheen...................................................................................... 10 8 Disc of pronotum glabrous at basal half, densely punctate. Frontal carina most often obsolete........................ 9 ��� Disc of pronotum pilose at basal half, with sparsely set double punctation, the larger punctures setiferous. Frontal carina most often strong. Length 5.3���6.6 mm. Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi................... Stiptopodius nitidus (Boucomont, 1923) 9 Pronotum with uniform, dense and medium-sized punctation. Elytra sparsely setose posteriorly. Mesotibiae not sinuate externally. Parameres short, with blunt tips. Length 4.5���6.0 mm. Tanzania, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia, Zimbabwe, South Africa (Limpopo, Gauteng and Natal), Angola................................... Stiptopodius singularis (P��ringuey, 1901) ��� Pronotum with punctures of mixed size from fine to large. Elytra fully setose. Mesotibiae sinuate externally. Parameres with tips sharp and projecting forward (male; female unknown). Length 7.6. mm. Angola....................................................................................... Stiptopodius muellerae Daniel & Deschodt, new species, 10 Disc of pronotum glabrous, with uniform punctation, punctures of fine to medium-size. Elytral interstriae either pilose or glabrous............................................................................................. 11 ��� Disc of pronotum pilose, with double punctation, the larger punctures fairly strong, ocellate and setigerous. Elytra always entirely pilose. Length 6.5���7.3 mm. Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon.................. Stiptopodius gaillardi (Boucomont, 1923) 11 Frontal carina strong. Upper surface of the body entirely glabrous, except sometimes on sides of pronotum and on the eighth elytral interstria. Length 6.0��� 7.2 mm. Sudan..................................... Stiptopodius glaber Branco, 1992 ��� Frontal carina obsolete. Upper surface of the body either pilose or glabrous. Pronotum always pilose on the sides; the eighth elytral interstriae varies from pilose or glabrous. Length 4.8���6.5 mm. Nigeria, Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Senegal.......................................................................... Stiptopodius nodieri (Boucomont, 1923) 12 Clypeal surface only partly granular; genae and vertex not granulose. Integument of pronotum not rugose.............. 13 ��� Head entirely granular. Integument of pronotum strongly rugose laterally. Length 4.9���5.0 mm. Zambia....................................................................................... Stiptopodius granulosus Branco, 2009 13 Head and pronotum of bronze colour. Length 4.5���5.9 mm. Somalia............... Stiptopodius glabricollis M��ller, 1942 ��� Head and pronotum of black colour (female; male unknown). Length 4.3 mm. Botswana (Savuti)................................................................................ Stiptopodius savuti Daniel & Deschodt, new species, Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Deschodt, Christian M., Davis, Adrian L. V. & Sole, Catherine L., 2020, The enigmatic dung beetle genus Stiptopodius Harold, 1871 (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) revisited: new species descriptions from southern Africa, pp. 394-404 in Zootaxa 4763 (3) on pages 403-404, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4763.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/3759527, {"references":["Branco, T. (2009) Notes on \" Stiptopodius \" Harold, 1871: number of tarsal segments of S. longipedis Branco, 1991, and description of a new species from Zambia (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Boletin Sociedad Entomologica Aragonesa, 44, 87 - 91.","Harold, E. von (1871) Verzeichniss der von Dr Beccari in Bogos gesammelten Coprophagen Lamellicornien. Coleopterologische Hefte, 8, 1 - 28. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / mmnd. 47918710229","Branco, T. (1991) Revision des genres du \" groupe \" Stiptopodius: Les genres Stiptopodius Harold et Stiptotarsus Branco (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, Nouvelle Serie, 27, 265 - 285.","Peringuey, L. (1901) Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa (Lucanidae and Scarabaeidae). Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society, 12, 1 - 920. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 21560382.1901.9525977","Branco, T. (1992) Revision des genres du \" groupe \" Stiptopodius: Donnes complementaires (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, Nouvelle Serie, 28, 101 - 108."]}

Stiptopodius savuti Daniel & Deschodt, new species (Figs. 1B, 4) Type locality: Savuti, North West, Botswana. Type material. Holotype, female: Savuti [Botswana, North West], Site 4 | S18.53092 [��]; E24.08378 [��] | 15.xii. 2005 | Deschodt & Tshikae | Carrion pitfall trap || HOLOTYPE: Stiptopodius | savuti Daniel & Deschodt | 2020 [printed on the red card] (TMSA). Description. Holotype, female. Length: 4.3 mm, width: 1.9 mm. Colour. Dorsally black; lateral edge of clypeus, legs, and last abdominal ventrite brown; setae yellowish. Head. Incision between medial clypeal teeth deeply concave; latero-clypeal edges not sinuate; genae with external protrusion sharply triangular; surface of the head smooth and punctate; ocellate punctures sparse on the middle of vertex; some large punctures with outer edges moderately raised on clypeus, otherwise, finely punctate; clypeo-frontal carina not visible; clypeal-genal suture present; vertex with carina occupying half the space between eyes, carina interrupted in the middle clearly forming two small cephalic tubercles. Antennae with eight antennomeres, labium setose. Pronotum. Convex, wider than long; base of pronotum marginate; anterior margin wider than posterior edge; in lateral view, lateral edge strongly sinuate before postero-lateral angles, central disc glabrous; punctation ocellate with sparse, short setae antero-laterally that emanate from centres of punctures. Elytra. Laterally straight, somewhat convex distally and concave proximally; sparsely and finely punctate in external-most four striae, the rest apunctate; interstriae with sparse, short setae visible basally, only interstriae V���VIII punctate. Pygidium. Convex with dense ocellate punctation bearing setae emanating from centres of punctures. Abdominal ventrites. Prosternum with anterior angles slanted forward and inwards, surface somewhat excavated. Mesoventrite dull, setose and punctate. Metaventrite shiny with long setae anteriorly, glabrous mid-posteriorly. Abdominal ventrites glabrous medially, shiny laterally, setigerous with ocellate punctures, setae arranged in lateral rows; last ventrites wider medially than others (female character). Legs. External and internal margins of profemora punctate, with well-developed setae, central area apunctate and glabrous; external and internal edges strongly and slightly marginate, respectively. Meso- and metafemora with external and internal edges sparsely punctate, all punctures bearing setae (shorter than those in profemora), surface between external and internal edges glabrous, strongly marginate internally. Protibiae crenulate with four teeth on external margin, a line of setae around teeth in dorsal view; in ventral view, protibiae with two carinae, internally punctate and pilose. Protibial spur long and inward curving. Meso- and metatibiae triangular and strongly widened apically. Protarsi broken off in both legs. Meso- and metatarsomeres I���IV triangular, widened apically, wider than long, strongly concave medially, external and internal edges with distal lobe; meso- and metatarsomere V rectangular and longer than others, with pair of very tiny apical claws. Male. Unknown. Distribution. This species is only known from the type locality Savuti in Botswana. Etymology. The specific name, a noun in apposition, refers to the name of the type locality. Diagnosis. Stiptopodius savuti new species is morphologically similar to S. granulosus. However, S. savuti new species can be distinguished by having the dorsal cephalic and pronotal surface smooth while in S. granulosus they are densely rugose. The new species bears a carina which is interrupted medially and clearly forms two small cephalic tubercles, unlike S. granulosus, whose cephalic carina does not form tubercles. Furthermore, the head of the new species is glabrous, whereas in S. granulosus it is setigerous. Remarks: The Afrotropical Stiptopodius savuti new species seems to be similar to the brown Somalian species of Stiptopodius glabricollis M��ller, 1942. Our knowledge on Afrotropical dung beetle biogeographical distribution patterns suggests that it is very unlikely that the inland species from Botswana could be a sub-population of the coastal eastern horn of Africa species, S. glabricollis (see also a similar case in G��nier & Josso 2017: 338). As such a wide and disjunct distribution is very rare among Afrotropical Scarabaeinae, we therefore consider the specimen from Savuti (Botswana) as a new species. Stiptopodius granulosus (from Zambia) is morphologically similar to the new species. Since both species occur in neighbour countries, there is a huge potential of misidentification between them, that���s why the diagnosis of the new species is compared to the closest species in southern Africa. Conservation status and potential threats. This species was recorded from the well-protected Savuti area of Chobe National Park in northern Botswana. The vegetation consists of somewhat open to dense stands of Philenoptera nelsii (Schinz) Schrire. The trees are about one to two meters tall with about 30% canopy cover (CMD, personal observation). Although it is protected at Savuti, the extent of occurrence of this species is not known and it should thus be assessed as Data Deficient., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Deschodt, Christian M., Davis, Adrian L. V. & Sole, Catherine L., 2020, The enigmatic dung beetle genus Stiptopodius Harold, 1871 (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) revisited: new species descriptions from southern Africa, pp. 394-404 in Zootaxa 4763 (3) on pages 399-400, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4763.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/3759527, {"references":["Genier, F. & Josso, J. F. (2016) Notes on Afrotropical Catharsius species described by Edgar von Harold (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae). Zootaxa, 4072 (3), 333 - 342. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4072.3.3"]}

Stiptopodius doriae species group Differential diagnosis. The Stiptopodius doriae species group differs from the Stiptopodius singularis species group by having the sides of the pronotum weakly sinuate before the postero-lateral angle in lateral view., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Deschodt, Christian M., Davis, Adrian L. V. & Sole, Catherine L., 2020, The enigmatic dung beetle genus Stiptopodius Harold, 1871 (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) revisited: new species descriptions from southern Africa, pp. 394-404 in Zootaxa 4763 (3) on page 395, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4763.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/3759527

Stiptopodius muellerae Daniel & Deschodt, new species (Figs. 1C, 2 A–B, 3A, 3C, 4) Type locality: Caconda, Huila, Angola. Type material. Holotype, male: Angola, Huila Prov. | 75 km S Kacopnda [Caconda] | 13.24 S – 15. 28 E || 8.11.2011;E-Y: 3916 | sandy forest, 1643m | leg. Ruth Müller || TM SOUTH AFRICA | TMSC13817 || HOLOTYPE: Stiptopodius | muellerae Daniel & Deschodt | 2020 (printed on red card) (TMSA). Description. Holotype, male. Length: 7.6 mm, width: 3.8 mm. Colour. Black. Head. Incision between medial clypeal teeth deeply concave, lateral clypeal edges not sinuate; external protrusion of genae sharply triangular; surface of head with green sheen; punctation varying from fine to large; setae well-developed except on glabrous anterior clypeal edge; clypeo-frontal carina visible; clypeo-genal suture present; vertex with small medial carina. Antennae with eight antennomeres; labium bears a few well-developed setae. Pronotum. Convex, wider than long; base of pronotum marginate; anterior margin wider than posterior; in lateral view, lateral edge strongly sinuate before postero-lateral angles, surface with green metallic sheen, ocellate punctation varying from fine to large, each side with small longitudinal tubercle; well-developed setae, except on glabrous central disc. Elytra. Lateral margin straight, somewhat convex distally and concave proximally, well-developed humeral umbone; striae sparsely and finely punctate. Interstriae punctate, fully setose. Pygidium. Convex and setose, punctation ocellate. Abdominal ventrites. Prosternum surface with well-developed setae, anterior angles of prosternum slanted forward and inward. Meso- and metaventrite dull, setose and densely punctate; metaventrite with long setae, surface impressed longitudinally at middle. Abdominal ventrites with ocellate punctures and strong setae arranged in rows laterally, glabrous medially; last abdominal ventrite narrowed medially (male character). Legs. Profemora sparsely punctate, bearing well-developed setae, external edge strongly marginate, internal margin slightly marginate. Meso- and metafemora with external and internal edges sparsely setigerous and punctate; surface between external and internal margin with few setigerous punctures, strongly marginate in both edges (external and internal). Protibiae crenulate with four teeth on external margin, line of setae around teeth in dorsal view; in ventral view, with two carinae, internally punctate and pilose. Protibial spur long and inward curving. Meso- and metatibiae triangular and strongly widened apically. Protarsi with five tarsomeres and clearly visible pair of claws; fifth protarsomere at least 2x longer than others (each individually). Meso- and metatarsomeres I–IV triangular, longer than wide, with internal line of strong setae on tarsomere I, strongly concave medially, bilobate distally, external lobe strong, internal lobe weak; tarsomere V rectangular and longer than others, followed by pair of very tiny apical claws. Aedeagus. Parameres symmetrical, elongate with tips acute (Figs. 2 A–B). Female. Unknown Distribution. The species is only known from the type locality, Caconda, Province of Huila, Angola. It was hand collected in sandy forest. Etymology. The specific name honours Ruth Müller, a friend and curator in charge of Coleoptera at the Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, Gauteng, Pretoria, South Africa, who collected the holotype. Diagnosis. The new species is somewhat similar to S. singularis by having the basal half of the pronotal disc glabrous and frontal carina obsolete. However, S. singularis bears uniform punctation on the pronotum, with a brown metallic sheen, whereas S. muellerae new species has a distinctive green metallic sheen with punctures of variable sizes ranging from fine to large. The elytra of this new species are fully setose, while those of S. singularis are slightly setose posteriorly and glabrous anteriorly. The mesotibiae are sinuate externally in S. muellerae new species but not in S. singularis. The male genitalia differ between the two species by having the tips of the parameres sharp and projecting forward in the new species (Figs. 2 A-B), whereas in S. singularis they are short and blunt (Figs. 2 E-F). S. muellerae new species is also much larger than S. singularis. Remarks. This is the first record of a Stiptopodius species whose meso- and metatarsomeres I–IV are longer than wide (Figs. 3A, C). The first tarsomere is the longest, which is in contrast to the other 5-articulated species, where tarsomere V is longer than others. Furthermore, in S muellerae new species, meso- and metatarsomeres I–IV bear a weak lobe externally. Conservation status and potential threats. The forest at the type locality is surrounded by lands supporting agricultural and pastoral farming activities (R. Müller, personal communication). It is therefore probably under severe pressure. As this species is only known from this locality, it may warrant the threat category of at least Vulnerable.

Stiptopodius singularis species group Differential diagnosis. The Stiptopodius singularis species group differs from the Stiptopodius doriae species by having the sides of the pronotum strongly sinuate before the postero-lateral angle in lateral view., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Deschodt, Christian M., Davis, Adrian L. V. & Sole, Catherine L., 2020, The enigmatic dung beetle genus Stiptopodius Harold, 1871 (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) revisited: new species descriptions from southern Africa, pp. 394-404 in Zootaxa 4763 (3) on page 399, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4763.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/3759527

Stiptopodius savuti Daniel & Deschodt, new species (Figs. 1B, 4) Type locality: Savuti, North West, Botswana. Type material. Holotype, female: Savuti [Botswana, North West], Site 4 | S18.53092 [°]; E24.08378 [°] | 15.xii. 2005 | Deschodt & Tshikae | Carrion pitfall trap || HOLOTYPE: Stiptopodius | savuti Daniel & Deschodt | 2020 [printed on the red card] (TMSA). Description. Holotype, female. Length: 4.3 mm, width: 1.9 mm. Colour. Dorsally black; lateral edge of clypeus, legs, and last abdominal ventrite brown; setae yellowish. Head. Incision between medial clypeal teeth deeply concave; latero-clypeal edges not sinuate; genae with external protrusion sharply triangular; surface of the head smooth and punctate; ocellate punctures sparse on the middle of vertex; some large punctures with outer edges moderately raised on clypeus, otherwise, finely punctate; clypeo-frontal carina not visible; clypeal-genal suture present; vertex with carina occupying half the space between eyes, carina interrupted in the middle clearly forming two small cephalic tubercles. Antennae with eight antennomeres, labium setose. Pronotum. Convex, wider than long; base of pronotum marginate; anterior margin wider than posterior edge; in lateral view, lateral edge strongly sinuate before postero-lateral angles, central disc glabrous; punctation ocellate with sparse, short setae antero-laterally that emanate from centres of punctures. Elytra. Laterally straight, somewhat convex distally and concave proximally; sparsely and finely punctate in external-most four striae, the rest apunctate; interstriae with sparse, short setae visible basally, only interstriae V–VIII punctate. Pygidium. Convex with dense ocellate punctation bearing setae emanating from centres of punctures. Abdominal ventrites. Prosternum with anterior angles slanted forward and inwards, surface somewhat excavated. Mesoventrite dull, setose and punctate. Metaventrite shiny with long setae anteriorly, glabrous mid-posteriorly. Abdominal ventrites glabrous medially, shiny laterally, setigerous with ocellate punctures, setae arranged in lateral rows; last ventrites wider medially than others (female character). Legs. External and internal margins of profemora punctate, with well-developed setae, central area apunctate and glabrous; external and internal edges strongly and slightly marginate, respectively. Meso- and metafemora with external and internal edges sparsely punctate, all punctures bearing setae (shorter than those in profemora), surface between external and internal edges glabrous, strongly marginate internally. Protibiae crenulate with four teeth on external margin, a line of setae around teeth in dorsal view; in ventral view, protibiae with two carinae, internally punctate and pilose. Protibial spur long and inward curving. Meso- and metatibiae triangular and strongly widened apically. Protarsi broken off in both legs. Meso- and metatarsomeres I–IV triangular, widened apically, wider than long, strongly concave medially, external and internal edges with distal lobe; meso- and metatarsomere V rectangular and longer than others, with pair of very tiny apical claws. Male. Unknown. Distribution. This species is only known from the type locality Savuti in Botswana. Etymology. The specific name, a noun in apposition, refers to the name of the type locality. Diagnosis. Stiptopodius savuti new species is morphologically similar to S. granulosus. However, S. savuti new species can be distinguished by having the dorsal cephalic and pronotal surface smooth while in S. granulosus they are densely rugose. The new species bears a carina which is interrupted medially and clearly forms two small cephalic tubercles, unlike S. granulosus, whose cephalic carina does not form tubercles. Furthermore, the head of the new species is glabrous, whereas in S. granulosus it is setigerous. Remarks: The Afrotropical Stiptopodius savuti new species seems to be similar to the brown Somalian species of Stiptopodius glabricollis Müller, 1942. Our knowledge on Afrotropical dung beetle biogeographical distribution patterns suggests that it is very unlikely that the inland species from Botswana could be a sub-population of the coastal eastern horn of Africa species, S. glabricollis (see also a similar case in Génier & Josso 2017: 338). As such a wide and disjunct distribution is very rare among Afrotropical Scarabaeinae, we therefore consider the specimen from Savuti (Botswana) as a new species. Stiptopodius granulosus (from Zambia) is morphologically similar to the new species. Since both species occur in neighbour countries, there is a huge potential of misidentification between them, that’s why the diagnosis of the new species is compared to the closest species in southern Africa. Conservation status and potential threats. This species was recorded from the well-protected Savuti area of Chobe National Park in northern Botswana. The vegetation consists of somewhat open to dense stands of Philenoptera nelsii (Schinz) Schrire. The trees are about one to two meters tall with about 30% canopy cover (CMD, personal observation). Although it is protected at Savuti, the extent of occurrence of this species is not known and it should thus be assessed as Data Deficient.

Sisyphus inconspicuus Daniel & Davis sp. n. (Figs. 11, 12D). ZooBank: http://zoobank.org/ A8C95127-D39B-4DC7-A564-0F77CCA4AB14 Diagnosis: Sisyphus inconspicuus sp. n. is similar to S. costatus; both bear inconspicuous ocellate punctation on the dorsal surface of the clypeus and frons, however, the vertex bears scattered ocellate punctures in S. costatus and dense ocellate points in the new species. Sisyphus inconspicuus sp. n. has a straight margin between the medial clypeal teeth and the anterior margins of the genae are arcuate. In S. costatus, the dorsal clypeal margin is distinctly concave and curved upwards between medial teeth whereas the genal margin is virtually straight (Figs. 11G, I). Additionally, the new species bears setae that are uniformly arranged on the elytra whereas, in S. costatus, the setae on the elytral interstriae alternate between rows that are dense or less dense. Description: Male holotype: Size. Length: 7 mm; width: 3.9 mm. Colour. Body and setae brown; meso- and metasternum black; antennae brown. Head. Medial teeth on the clypeus separated by a straight margin; shallowly notched edge between medial and lateral teeth; genal margin arcuate anteriorly. Dorsal surface of the clypeus and frons inconspicuously punctate (Fig. 11I); epicranial suture clearly visible; vertex setigerous with dense ocellate punctation. Pronotum. Convex; maximum length equal to maximum width; dorsal surface finely setose with ocellate punctation; setae on the antero-lateral projection well-developed. Complete lateral prothoracic ridge between the prothoracic disc and prothoracic episternum. Elytra. Wider and ovoid proximally, narrow posteriorly; elytral striae minutely punctate and crenulate, characterized by a distinct crenulate double line, which is interrupted by fine, ocellate strial puctures. Granulation and notches basally on elytral striae 1���4; setae evenly distributed on the interstriae. Hind wings and venation fully developed. Pygidium. Setigerous with ocellate punctation arranged in a U-shape. Sternites. Abdominal sternites finely crenulate, setigerous with ocellate punctation; setae arranged in rows laterally; meso-metasternal suture visible, acute laterally; meso- and metasternum densely punctate and setose; a punctate depression present on the postero-medial surface of the metasternum. Legs. In ventral view, antero-lateral carina of profemur punctate, internally pubescent with a lateral row of fine and well developed setae; meso- and metafemur with granulation, densely punctate and setose; meso- and metatrochanter contiguous with femur, metatrochanter slightly projected backwards; metacoxa punctate and shagreened ventroanteriorly; protibia with three teeth and single terminal spine; mesotibia punctate and setose with two terminal spines; metatibia densely setose, serrated laterally with two spurs; pro- meso- and metatarsi five segmented with two claws, setose laterally; first tarsal segment of the meso- and meta-thoracic legs with a row of strong setae on the external edge. Aedeagus. Paremeres simple, symmetric; truncated basally (Fig. 12D). Morphological variation Size: Male: length: 8.2���6.0 mm; width: 3.8���4.1 mm; Female: 8.0���6.0 mm; width: 3.0��� 3.6 mm. Head: In some populations, mainly from the Eastern Cape (The Haven): lateral side of the clypeus is completely smooth as far as the clypeo-genal suture in some specimens; the lateral margin of the genae tends to be less convex; the surface of the clypeus is less setigerous. Colour: Inland populations are black and brown whilst the majority of the coastal population is black although two specimens from Pomene (Mozambique) are brown. Male: Meta- and mesotibia curved (Fig. 1H); last abdominal sternite narrowed medially (Fig. 1A). Female: Meta- and mesotibia almost straight (Fig. 1G); last visible abdominal sternite not constricted medially (Fig. 1B). Examined type material Holotype: (♂ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Ithala Game Reserve, Ngubu; Dense woodland 27��32���55���S 31��13���32���E. 13.i.1999, dung baited pitfall; leg: Chown, McGeogh & Davis. Paratypes: (6♂, 2♀ SANC): with the same data as the holotype. (12♂, 9♀ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Ithala Game Reserve 27��31���S 31��14���E, 12���14.i.1999, dung baited pitfall, leg: Davis. (3♂, 3♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, E. Transvaal, B Blyde River Canyon 24��35���S 30�� 48���E, 28.xi.1991, dung baited pitfall, leg: Klimaszewski. (3♂, 3♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Transvaal, 20 km NE Thabazimbi 24.32��S 27.24��E, 23���24.iii.1985, leg: Vans. (1♂, 1♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, N. Transvaal, Waterberg, Farm 223; 24.11��S 27.50��E, 28.xi.1991, leg: Strydom. (1♂, 1♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, E. Transvaal, Barberton 16 km N, 25.44��S 30.59��E, 28.xi.1991, dung baited pitfall, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Transvaal, Nelspruit, Nat. Res. Dry valley, 25.29��S 30.55��E, 09.ii.1987, dung baited pitfall, groundtraps 53 days, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂ TMSA; 1♂ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, Transvaal, 20 km NE of Pretoria, Farm Roodeplaat, dung baited pitfall, 14���15.xi.1983, leg: Davis. (1♂, 1♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, E. Transvaal, Klaserie, 23.59��S 31.02��E. 3.v.1981, dung baited pitfall, leg: Endr��dy- Younga. (2♂, 2♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Transvaal, Nelspruit, 18 km 25.37��S 30.58��E. 24.ix.1986, dung baited pitfall, groundtraps 31 days, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂, ♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, E. Transvaal, Nelspruit district, Farm de Hoop E, 24.ix.1986, dung baited pitfall, groundtraps, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂, 1♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, E. Transvaal, Mariepskop, 24.35��S 30.50��E, 2.v.1986, dung baited pitfall, groundtraps 5days, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, E. Transvaal, Nerina Nat. Res. 23.42��S 30.16��E, 2.v.1986, dung baited pitfall, groundtraps 50 days, leg: Breytenbanch. (1♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Transvaal, Langjan Nature Res, 22.52��S 29.14��E, 10���20.i.1980, leg: Prinsloo. (13♂, 17♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Kruger National Park, Sukuza, 1 km NW, 24.59��S 31.37��E, 22.i.1995, dung baited pitfall, groundtraps, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (3♂, 5♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Kruger National Park, Pafuri res. Camp, 22.25��S 31.12��E, 31.i.1994, dung baited pitfall, groundtraps 10 days, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂, 2♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, Kruger National Park, Sukuza, 1 km NW, 24.59��S 31.37��E. 22.i.1999, cattle dung, leg: Inward. (1♂, 2♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Kruger National Park, Punda Maria, 22.38��S 30.59��E, 11.ii.1994, elephant dung, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Kruger National Park, Sukuza, 24.00��S, 31.00��E, xii.1977, cattle dung, leg: Scholtz. (10♂, 13♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, N. Transvaal, Mmabolela Estates, 22.40��S 28.15��E, 10.iii.1973, groundtraps, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, Sodwana Bay 10 km NW, 27.32��S 32.37��E, 24.xi.1992, groundtraps 5days, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (7♂, 8♀ TMSA) SOUTH AF- RICA, Zululand, Ndumu Game Reserve, 26.54��S 32.17��E. 24.xi.1992, white rhino dung, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KwaZulu Natal, Ngome State Forest, 27.48��S 31.25��E, 12���17.xi.1995, white rhino dung, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (4♂, 6♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Mkuze Game Reserve, 24.xi.1981, legs: Doube, MacQueen, Davis & Flanagan. (4♂, 5♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, St. Lucia Estuary, 26.viii.1978, leg: Bornemissza. (1♂, 3♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Hluhluwe Game Reserve (Inzimane), 24.xi.1982, leg: Doube. (4♂, 3♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, St. Lucia Est. Nat. Res, forest, 23.i.1979, leg: Aschenborn. (9♂, 7♀ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Ntshondwe, 27��43���S 31��15���E, 24.i.1999, leg: Davis. (2♂, 2♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Limpopo, 17 km N Thabazimbi, Kransberg, 20.xii.2009, leg: Beyers. (1♂, 1♀ TMSA) MOZAMBIQUE, Pomene, 22.59��S 35.35��E, 02.v.1974, leg: Strydom. (1♂ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Gauteng, Roodeplaat Nat. Res, 25��37-39���S 28��20-21���E. 13���14.xii.2001, leg: Davis & Deschodt. (1♂ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Northwest Province, Rustenburg, 25��43���S 27��10���E. 27.ii.1999, leg: Wagemaker. (1♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, Mtubatuba, 28.22��S 32.19��E, 3.iv.1974, fruit trap, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, S. Natal, Weza, Ingeri Forest, 30.32��S, 29.41��E, 23.xi.1989, leg: Endr��dy-Younga & Klimaszew. (1♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, Limpopo, Murmelende Waters Farm, Kampersrus, Mariepskop 24��32���S 30��17���E, 08���11.iv.1992, leg: Stals. (1♂, 1♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Limpopo Prov, Lajuma, southern slope, 900 m, 16.i.2016, leg: Colin Schoeman. (1♂, 1♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, Natal, Umfolozi, 1���7.x.1970, legs: Bornemissza & Aschenborn. (1♂, 1♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, Cape Province, Avontuur (20 km S), 2.ii.1977, leg: Bornemissza. (3♂, 6♀ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, Eastern Cape, Transkei, The Haven, 32.15��S 28.55��E, 09.xii.1979, E-Y: 1696, groundtraps, 7 days, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (2♂, 2♀ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, Eastern Cape, Transkei, Coast Dwesa forest, 32.17��S 28.50��E, 5.iii.1985, zebra dung, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, Lake Bangazi, 28.07��S, 32.31��E, 12.xii.1975, groundtraps, 5 days, leg: Endr��dy- Younga. (12♂, 8♀ UPSA): SOUTH AFRICA, NW Province, Mooinooi, Maretlwane Bush Camp (near to river) 25��47���07���S 27��34���37���E, 1274 m, 12���14.ii.2016, leg: Daniel. (1♂, 1♀ SANC) MOZAMBIQUE, Sofala, Beira (15 mi N), 19.i.1972, leg: Bornemissza & Kirk. (2♂, 2♀ UPSA) MOZAMBIQUE, Sofala, Gorongosa National Park (Cheringoma), near Claud���s waterfall Camp 19��01���43���S; 34��40���24���W, 1���3.v.2013, leg: B de Medeiros. (5♂, 6♀ UPSA) MOZAMBIQUE, Sofala, Gorongosa National Park (near Chitengo) Sandforest 18��57���24���S 34��20���24���E, 26 m, 14.vi.2014, pitfall, h. dung, leg: GM Daniel (1♂, 1♀ SANC): MOZAMBIQUE, Sofala, Dondo 19��37���S 34��45���E. 19.i.1972, leg: Bornemissza & Kirk. Etymology: The species name reflects the inconspicuous punctures on the frons. Distribution: Sisyphus inconspicuus sp. n. occurs in South Africa and Mozambique. It has been recorded from moist savanna or dense woodland and riverine vegetation. It has also been collected in dry shaded vegetation along the coastline, in sand forest, and in dry, dense savanna from KwaZulu Natal (South Africa) to Sofala Bay (Mozambique) (Fig. 13)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 32-35, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629

Sisyphus bicuariensis Daniel & Davis sp. n. (Fig. 3A). ZooBank: http://zoobank.org/ E02CDE50-8BB1-45D9-87A9-610A7C3713A0 Diagnosis: S. bicuariensis sp. n. resembles S. trichodichromicus Montreuil, 2015. Both bear bicoloured setae. However, S. trichodichromicus bears a shallow notch separating the medial teeth from the blunt lateral teeth; the clypeo-genal suture shows an obtusely angled cleft; and the genae are simple and arcuate. This differs to S. bicuariensis sp. n., where a markedly deep notch separates the medial teeth from the sharp lateral teeth; the clypeo-genal suture shows a rectangular cleft; and the genae are long and virtually parallel. Additionally, the shapes of the parameres are different in both species. Description: Male holotype: Size. Length: 4.2 mm; width: 2.2 mm. Colour. Black body with grey and black setae (Fig. 5G); clypeus shiny brown antero-laterally; meso- and metasternum black with brown and white setae; antennal club brown. Head. Clypeus upcurved antero-laterally; margin between medial teeth straight; a deep notch between medial and lateral teeth. Clypeo-genal suture with a rectangular cleft; genae long and virtually straight. Frons and vertex with dorsal ocellate punctation and setation. Frons declivous dorso-medially; epicranial suture visible; vertex with a few granules antero-medially. Pronotum. Convex with maximum width longer than maximum length; disc bearing three depressions and ocellate punctation; setae black and grey medially on the central disc, grey laterally; setae on pro-episternum grey, well-developed antero-laterally. A complete lateral prothoracic ridge between the pronotal disc and pro-episternum. Elytra. Narrow posteriorly bearing thicker black setae alternating with thin and thick grey setae either in equal proportion (1:1) or with less grey setae; weakly developed tufts of setae protrude from the epipleurae below the edge of the elytra (Hind wing. Wing and venation fully developed. Pygidium. Bearing scattered setae and ocellate punctation; narrow basally. Sternites. Margin between abdominal sternites finely crenulate; setation well-developed laterally, less so medially; punctation dense laterally and sparse medially; meso-metasternal suture visible; meso- and metasternum densely punctate with matted setae antero-laterally; metasternum with a punctate depression postero-medially. Mesepimerum and metepisternum finely punctate and setose. Legs. In ventral view, profemur punctate and pubescent, carinate antero-laterally with a lateral row of fine and well-developed setae; in lateral view, meso- and metafemur with granulation, also densely punctate and setose; meso- and metatrochanter contiguous with femur, metatrochanter larger and slightly projected backwards; metacoxa punctate and shagreened ventro-anteriorly; protibia with three teeth and a single terminal spine; mesotibia punctate and setose with two terminal spines; metatibia densely setose, serrated laterally with two spurs; pro-, meso- and metatarsus five-segmented, with two claws, setose laterally; first tarsal segment of meso- and metathoracic legs with a row of dense setae on the external margin. Aedeagus. Phallobase slightly curved. Median lobe clearly visible. Parameres (Fig. 6A). Morphological variation Size: Male: length: 5.0–4.0 mm; width: 2.6–2.0 mm; Female: length: 4.9– 4.1 mm, width 2.7–2.0 mm. Male. Meta- and mesotibia curved; with a carina on the dorso-posterior edge of the meta- and mesofemur; last abdominal sternite narrowed medially (Fig. 1A). Female. Meta- and mesotibia almost straight; lacking a carina on the dorso-posterior margin of the meta- and mesofemur; last visible abdominal sternite two times wider than in males (Fig. 1B). Examined type material Holotype: (♂ SANC) ANGOLA, Bicuari NP (15.375173°S 14.752320°E) (2 km N Camp); 18.xii.1974; leg: Davis & Temby /1671/, / Ex coll. CSIRO, Div. Entomology, South Africa Station /. Paratypes: (20♂, 16♀ SANC) with the same data as the holotype. (10♂, 6♀ SANC) ANGOLA, Caconda (37 & 30 km SW); 21.xii.1974; leg: Davis & Temby; / 1678/, / Ex coll. CSIRO, Div. Entomology, South Africa Station /. (2♂, 3♀ SANC) ANGOLA, Sá da Bandeira (11 & 3 km W), 29.xii.1974; leg: Davis & Temby /1691/, / Ex coll. CSIRO, Div. Entomology, South Africa Station /. (2♂, 2♀ SANC) ANGOLA, Paiva Coucero (50 & 45 km E); 18.xii.1974; leg: Davis & Temby, /1671/, / Ex coll. CSIRO, Div. Entomology, South Africa Station /. (1♂, 1♀ SANC) ANGOLA, Huila; 22.xii.1974, leg: Davis & Temby /1683/, / Ex coll. CSIRO, Div. Entomology, South Africa Station /. Additional examined type and non-type material: S. trichodichromicus (Holotype: MHNH, through photograph without locality data); (3♂, 4♀ TMSA) ZAMBIA, Liuwa Plains; 14.643259°S 22.626423°E, 29–30.xi.2003, 1050 m, leg: Deschodt & Groenewald. (2♂, 4♀ SANC) ZAMBIA, idem; (2♂, 2♀ UPSA) ZAMBIA, with the same data. Etymology: Patronym is a noun in apposition, which reflects the name of the area in which the majority of type specimens were collected: Bicuari National Park, South Angola. Distribution: The new species may be associated with unshaded vegetation and open woodland in southern Angola (Fig. 7).

Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L., Scholtz, Clarke H. (2020): Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions. Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1): 1-61, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195

Neosisyphus tembyi Daniel & Davis sp. n. (Figs. 7, 8C) ZooBank: http://zoobank.org/ 476EBD87-13C2-4DE0-A31E-883EEC69DA66 Diagnosis: N. tembyi sp. n. is similar to Neosisyphus jossoi Montreuil, 2015. Both species are roughly the same size and lack sharp spines on the posterior margin of the metafemur. However, N. tembyi sp. n. bears a small angled protuberance on the midposterior margin of the metafemur in males. The metatrochanter projection in major males of the new species is ½ of the total length of the metafemur and is somewhat inwardly projected at the tip. Unlike in N. jossoi, in which the metatrochanter projection is ¾ of the total length of the metafemur in major males and strongly inwardly projected. Southern African specimens of N. setiger Roth (1851) differ from the new species by bearing a shorter metatrochanter in males, which is ¼ of the total length of the metafemur. Furthermore, the metatrochanter in Southern African N. setiger projects straight and is never bent on the tip. The phallobase and parameres of all of the above species are distinctly different. Description: Male Holotype: Size. Male: length: 7.3 mm; width: 4.5 mm. Colour. Black body with brown setae; meso- and metasternum black; antennal club brown. Head. Anterior edge of clypeus with shallow sinuosity between medial teeth; lateral extreme of clypeal margin simply arcuate. Clypeo-genal suture markedly cleft; genae elongate. Frons and vertex dorsally granular, setose and minutely punctate, epicranial suture clearly visible. Pronotum. Convex with a sheen on dorsal surface; maximum width as long as the maximum length; setae inserted between ocellate punctures. Incomplete lateral prothoracic ridge between pronotal disc and prothoracic episternum. Elytra. Broad proximally and narrow posteriorly; well-spaced setae on interstriae; elytral surface shiny, distinct antero-lateral humeral callus; striae fine with double marginal lines interrupted by smooth ocellate strial punctures; granulation basally on elytral striae 4–7. Pygidium. Bearing U-shaped, ocellate punctation, a metallic sheen and setation. Sternites. Margins between abdominal sternites setigerous laterally, and glabrous medially with minute ocellate punctation; meso-metasternal suture visible; meso- and metasternum finely punctate and setose; metasternum with a punctate depression on the postero-medial edge. Mesepimeron and metepisternum finely punctate and setose. Legs. In ventral view, profemur carinate antero-laterally, punctate and internally pubescent with a lateral row of fine and well-developed setae; mesofemur finely punctate and setose, lacking any projection posteriorly; metafemur with an angled-protuberance mid-posteriorly with fine punctation and setae; metatrochanter projected backwards almost reaching top of angled protuberance; tip of metatrochanter slightly project- ed inward, but always parallel with metafemur. Metacoxa punctate and shagreened ventro-anteriorly. Protibia with three teeth and single terminal spine; meso-metatibia densely setose, serrated laterally, with two terminal spines on mesotibia, and two terminal spurs on metatibia; pro-, meso- and metatarsus five-segmented, with two claws; mostly setose. Aedeagus. Parameres separated by visible dorsal membranous portion extending nearly to the middle; arciform ridge bordering the membrane laterally, deeply notched medially; inwardly curved on the apex (Fig. 18C). Morphological variation Males bear a backwardly projected metatrochanter that is curved inwardly at the tip; this projection is absent in females where the metatrochanter is contiguous with the metafemur. The pronotum in males is larger than in females. Examined type material Holotype: (1♂ SANC) / Angola, Paiva Coucero (14.816667°S 15.55°E) (50 & 45 km E), 18.xii.1974, leg: Davis & Temby /, / Ex coll CSIRO, Div. Entomology S. African Station /. Paratypes: (1♀ SANC) same data as holotype. Distribution: The species is only known from woodland vegetation in southern Angola (Paiva Coucero) (Fig. 19). Etymology: The patronym is named after Ian Temby, a former researcher at the CSIRO, Division of Entomology, South African station; who was one of the collectors of the type material.

Sisyphus manni Montreuil, 2015 (Fig. 2E). Montreuil 2015c: 2���3 Type locality: Limpopo, Kruger National Park. Size: Male: length: 5.5���4.0 mm; width: 2.5���2.0 mm. Female: length: 5.5���4.0 mm, width 2.5���2.0 mm. Diagnosis: In S. manni, proximal elytral setae are primarily distributed uniformly becoming arranged in sparse tufts mid-basally and posteriorly, unlike in S. perissinottoi where dense tufts of setae occur across the entire elytra. S. manni bears three depressions on the pronotal disc, which are lacking in S. perissinottoi. Examined type material Holotype: (MHNH, through photograph without locality data). Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: S. manni is only known from South Africa. The species is associated with upland to highland grassland and open woodland in Gauteng (cited as S. alveatus by Davis et al. 2005), KwaZulu Natal, Mpumalanga and Northwest Provinces. It has also been collected in unshaded riverine vegetation in Limpopo (Fig. 4)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 15-16, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Montreuil, O. (2015 a) Nouveaux Sisyphus Latreille d'afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 120 (1): 91 - 102.","Montreuil, O. (2015 c) Premiers cas de brachypterisme dans le genre Sisyphus Latreille (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Annales de la Societe entomologique de France, 51 (4): 281 - 293.","Davis, A. L. V., Scholtz, C. H., & Deschodt, C. (2005) A dung beetle survey of selected Gauteng nature reserves: implications for conservation of the provincial scarabaeine fauna. African entomology, 13 (1): 1 - 16."]}

Sisyphus oralensis Daniel & Davis, 2016 (Figs. 14B, E; 15A). Daniel et al. 2016: 70 Size: Male: length: 3.4���4.8 mm, width: 2.1���2.5 mm. Female: length: 3.9���4.7 mm, width: 2.1���2.5 mm. Type locality: Richard���s Bay (KwaZulu Natal, South Africa) Diagnosis: S. oralensis resembles Sisyphus auricomus sp. n. However, it differs by the less dense cover of long yellow setae on the pronotal disc that are not distributed uniformly, but, mostly arranged in a linear pattern separated by bare patches (Fig. 14E). Furthermore, parameres of S. oralensis are notched dorso-transversally (Fig. 15A). Examined type material Holotype: (♂ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Richard���s Bay 28��39���29.1���S 32��15���19.2���E, 27.i.2000, leg: Davis & Delport. Paratypes: (5♂, 8♀ UPSA): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN Richard���s Bay 28��39���S 32��15���E, 26���27.i.2000, leg: Davis & Delport. (4♀ UPSA; 3♂, 2♀ SANC): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Thembe Elephant Park 27��01���S 32��24���E, 17.xii.1996, leg: B.J. Van Rensburg. (9♂, 8♀ UPSA): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Thembe Elephant Park 27��01���S 32��24���E, 17.vii.1995, leg: B.J. Van Rensburg. (2♂, 3♀ UPSA): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN Thembe Elephant Park 26��55���S 32��23���E, 15���30.x.2008, leg: B.J. Van Rensburg. (2♂ SANC, 1♀ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Umfolozi 28��15���S 31�� 55���E, 25.viii.1971, leg: Bornemissza & Insley. (1♂, 10♀ SANC): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN St Lucia Est. Nat. Reserve, Dune Forest 28��13���S 32��21���E, 27.x.1978, leg: Bornemissza. (1♀ SANC): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN Ntl Kosi Bay Nature Res 26��34���S 32��28���E, 8���11.ii.1990, leg: B. Grobbelaar. (1♀ SANC): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Near Richards Bay, 28��36���52���S 32��17���34���E, 27.x.1978, leg: Bornemissza. (1♂ SANC): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Thembe Elephant Park 27��01���S 32��24���E, 01���49. ii.1996, leg: Stals. (5♂, 6♀ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Ntl Kosi Bay Nature Res 26��34���S 32��28���E, 14.xi.2002, leg: Burger, Harrison & Muller. (7♂, 8♀ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, Sodwana Bay 5km, 27��21���S 32��23���E, 23.xi.1992, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (8♂, 8♀ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, N Zululand, Ndumu Game Reserve 26��32���S 32��10���E, 1.xii.1992, leg: Endr��dy- Younga. (30♂, 42♀ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, N Zululand, Lake Bangazi 28��04���S 32��18���E, 12.xii.1992, leg: Endrodi-Younga. (1♂, 2♀ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, St. L��cia. Mission Rock 28��13���S 32��21���E, 23.xi.1992, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (1♂, 2♀ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, Natal, Cape Vidal, Forest litter 28��8���S 32��33���E, 23.i.1990, leg: J. Klimaszewski. (1♂, 2♀ TMSA): SOUTH AFRICA, N Zululand, Hluhluwe Game Reserve. 28��03���S 32��02���E, 20.xi.1992. leg: Endr��dy-Younga. (12♂, 30♀ SANC); SOUTH AFRICA, KZN St Lucia Est. Nat. Reserve, Forest 28��13���S 32��21���E, 24���23.i.1979, leg: NH Aschenborn. (1♂, 2♀ TMSA): MOZAMBIQUE, Inhambane, Pomene, 22��35���S 35��21���E, 04.v.1974, leg: A. Strydom. (5♂, 5♀ UPSA): MOZAMBIQUE, Maputo Elephant Reserve 26��39���S 32��43���E, 10���16.xi.2007, leg: W. Str��mpher & C. Deschodt. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: S. oralensis is a coastal and sandforest endemic (Jacobs et al. 2010; Daniel et al. 2016). It has been observed in dense coastal woodlands and forest from Maputaland, north-east South Africa, to south-east Mozambique (Maputo Elephant Reserve and Pomene) (Fig. 16). Furthermore, recently, we found new distribution records from uMkhuze Game Reserve in South Africa (see Supplementary information). The species was collected in shaded deep sand vegetation, under pitfalls baited by dead diplopods. Remarks: Revision of S. oralensis type material has revealed that specimens from Mozambique (Dondo, Beira and Gorongosa) with distinct golden hair on the pronotum belong to a new species of the seminulum species-group that is described below. In addition, it should be noted that in the original description of S. oralensis (Daniel et al. 2016), three specimens (a male and two females) from Ithala Game Reserve (Kwa- Zulu Natal, South Africa) were cited in error as paratypes of S. oralensis. These same three specimens were also cited correctly as paratypes of S. umbraphilus in the same publication., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 37-38, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Daniel, G. M., Davis, A. L. V, & Scholtz, C. H. (2016) Three new Sisyphus species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from shaded vegetation in southern Africa. Zootaxa, 4147 (1): 67 - 74.","Jacobs, C. T., Scholtz, C. H., Escobar, F., & Davis, A. L. V. (2010) How might intensification of farming influence dung beetle diversity (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Maputo Special Reserve (Mozambique)? Journal of Insect Conservation, 14 (4): 389 - 399."]}

Sisyphus costatus (Thunberg, 1818) (Figs. 11, 12B). Peringu��y 1901:100; Gillet 1912:22; Arrow 1927:458; Haaf 1955:355���6; Ferreira 1972: 794���5; Harold 1869:984 Ateuchus costatus Thunberg, 1818 Thunberg 1818:412 Size: Male: length: 5.3��� 4.8 mm, width: 3.0���2.0 mm. Female: length: 5.3��� 4.2 mm, width: 2.6��� 2 mm. Type locality: (Cape of Good Hope) South Africa Diagnosis: S. costatus is close in appearance to S. australis sp. n. In both species, the elytral interstriae bear alternating rows of well-developed or less-developed setae (Fig. 11F). However, S. costatus is distinguished by an upcurved anterior clypeal edge and a concavity between the medial clypeal teeth. In addition, it lacks a carina between the clypeus and the frons (Fig. 11G). Examined type material (1♀ SMNH) Lectotype (designated here): Red label / Uppsala University Zoology Museum; Thunberg, saml.nr. 3206., Ateuchus costatus, Cap. minutus. F. TYP/ / Lectotype, det. GM Daniel, 2016 /. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: S. costatus has been recorded in moist upland savanna and highland grassland (Davis et al. 1999, Davis et al. 2005) from the Eastern Cape to the north of South Africa (Fig. 13). Remarks: The species was described by Thunberg (1818) as Ateuchus costatus. Gillet (1912) transferred Thunberg���s species to the genus Sisyphus., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 29-30, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Thunberg, C. P. (1818) Coleoptera Capensia, Antennis Lamellatis, sive, clava fissili instructa, descripta, memoires de l'Acad. T. VI.","Peringuey, L. (1901) Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa. Transactions of the South African philosophical Society. Cape Town, 12: 1 - 563 (13 - 368).","Arrow, G. J. (1927) Notes on the Coleopterous genus Sisyphus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, 9 (19): 456 - 465.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088.","Harold, E. von (1869). Scarabaeidae. Gemminger, M. and Harold, E. Catalogus Coleopterorum. bucusque descriptorum, synonymicus et systematics, autotribus, 4: 976 - 1346. http: // www. iucnredlist. org / static / categories _ criteria _ 3 _ 1 access on 2017.03. 23.","Daniel, G. M., Davis, A. L. V, & Scholtz, C. H. (2016) Three new Sisyphus species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from shaded vegetation in southern Africa. Zootaxa, 4147 (1): 67 - 74.","Davis, A. L. V., Scholtz, C. H., & Chown, S. L. (1999) Species turnover, community boundaries and biogeographical composition of dung beetle assemblages across an altitudinal gradient in South Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 26 (5): 1039 - 1055.","Davis, A. L. V., Scholtz, C. H., & Deschodt, C. (2005) A dung beetle survey of selected Gauteng nature reserves: implications for conservation of the provincial scarabaeine fauna. African entomology, 13 (1): 1 - 16."]}

Sisyphus genierorum Montreuil, 2015 (Figs. 5, 6C). Montreuil 2015a: 91, 93, 99���100 Type locality: Quirimbas National Park, Mareja (Cabo Delgado, Mo��ambique) Size: Male: length: 10���8.0 mm, width: 5.5��� 5 mm. Female: length: 9.5��� 8.5 mm, width: 5.0��� 4.7 mm. Diagnosis: S. genierorum resembles S. sordidus. In both species, tufts of epipleural setae are visible from above at the outer margin of the elytra (Fig. 5H); also, pronotal setae arise from the centre of ocellate punctures. However, S. genierorum differs by the much finer and uniformly arranged setae on the elytral interstriae. It is also much larger than S. sordidus. Examined type material Paratypes: (2♀ CMN) MOZAMBIQUE: / Cabo Delgado, Taratibu (site 3), P.N. Quirimbas, 340 m; 12��48���02���S 39��41���49���E, 8.i.2013, eastern Miombo woodlands, dung trap 24 h. F & S. G��nier. 2013-47 /; /World Scarab database WSD00024494/, Sisyphus genierorum n. sp.; O. Montreuil d��t. 2014. (1♀, 3♂ CMN) MOZAMBIQUE: / Cabo Delgado, Mareja (site 2), P.N. Quirimbas, 200 m; 12��51���41���S 40��09���31���E, 24.xii.2012, eastern Miombo woodlands, dung trap (shaded), leg: F & S. G��nier. 2012-08 /; /World Scarab database WSD00024355/, / Sisyphus genierorum n. sp.; O. Montreuil d��t. 2014/. Distribution: S. genierorum is currently only known from Quirimbas National Park (Cabo Delgado, Mozambique) (Fig. 7), where it is associated with the Eastern Miombo Woodlands ecoregion of Olson et al. (2001)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on page 22, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Montreuil, O. (2015 a) Nouveaux Sisyphus Latreille d'afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 120 (1): 91 - 102.","Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V., Underwood, E. C., & Loucks, C. J. (2001) Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience, 51 (11): 933 - 938."]}

Sisyphus caffer Boheman, 1857 (Figs. 5, 6B). Boheman 1857: 195���6; Harold 1869: 984; P��ringuey 1902: 106���7; Haaf 1955: 362���4; Ferreira 1972: 82, Sch��fer & Fischer 1992:121; Sch��fer & Fischer 2001:53 Size: Male: length: 7.8��� 6.9 mm, width: 4.4��� 3.5 mm. Female: length: 7.6��� 7.1 mm, width: 4.5���3.0 mm. Type locality: Caffraria (South Africa). Diagnosis: S. caffer is close in appearance to S. sordidus Boheman, 1857. However, they can be separated morphologically by the following features: S. caffer bears much finer elytral setae, which are distributed in single rows; S. sordidus bears thicker elytral setae, which are distributed in non-single rows forming bunches. In S. caffer, pronotal setae are inserted between ocellate punctures (Fig. 5F), whereas in S. sordidus, the setae originate from the centre of ocellate punctures (Fig. 5H). Furthermore, S. sordidus occurs in unshaded lowland vegetation associated with warm temperatures whereas S. caffer is associated with highland grassland under cooler conditions. Examined type material Holotype (photograph): (1♂ NHRS): /type/; /Caffraria/; /leg: J.Wahlb /; /309; 72/; /244; 73/; / S. caffer Bohm /; red label: /typus/; white label (handwritten): /TYPE Sisyphus caffer BOHEMAN, det. J. Ferrer /; /Naturhistoriska, Riksmuseet Stockholm; loan 37/90/; /9385 E92+/; /NHRS-SRAH 000000221/. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: S. caffer occurs in South Africa, Namibia, Lesotho and Bostwana. The species has been recorded in upland and highland grasslands under cooler conditions (Davis et. al. 2005) in both South Africa and Lesotho (29.7��S 27.4��E). In South Africa, the localities extend northwards from the Eastern Cape and eastern Free State to the latitude of Pretoria (28.19��E 25.80��S) and also along the eastern escarpment of KwaZulu Natal and Mpumalanga. The lowlands beyond the northern Gauteng Mountains of the Witwatersrand (24.54��S 27.08��E) may act as barriers, although the species is also found in isolated uplands further to the northwest, such as the Blouberg. S. caffer has also been recorded in unshaded vegetation at the margins of its range in Kneneng (Botswana) (23.78��S 25.27��E) and in a dry upland outlier in the north of Namibia (Kaoko Otavi) (Fig. 7). Kaoko Otavi represents a disjunction in the distribution of S. caffer from its main range on the Highveld of South Africa. It is noteworthy that N. macrorubrus and Proagoderus lanista (Castelnau, 1840) also show similar disjunct occurrences on the South African Highveld and as rarities in north Namibia (Davis 1997). Remarks: We cannot confirm or refute the validity of S. crispatus because the type specimen has been lost. Furthermore, the original description and image presented by Gory (1833) are imprecise and insufficient to determine the identity of the species. S. crispatus was described from the same imprecise type locality (Caffraria) as two other species (S. caffer and S. sordidus). Under these circumstances, we are not confident to state which of the two species might be a junior synonym of S. crispatus. According to the ICZN, article 75.5 ���when an author considers that the taxonomic identity of a nominal species-group taxon cannot be determined from its existing name-bearing type, its name is a nomen dubium ���. Therefore, we propose S. crispatus as a nomen dubium., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 20-21, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Boheman, C. H. (1857) Insecta Caffrariae annis 1838 - 1845 a JA Wahlberg collecta. Pars. II. Coleoptera (Scarabaeides). Holmiae: Offieina Nordstedtiana. - 395 pp, 1.","Harold, E. von (1869). Scarabaeidae. Gemminger, M. and Harold, E. Catalogus Coleopterorum. bucusque descriptorum, synonymicus et systematics, autotribus, 4: 976 - 1346. http: // www. iucnredlist. org / static / categories _ criteria _ 3 _ 1 access on 2017.03. 23.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088.","Schafer, P., & Fischer, E. (1992) Zur Scarabaeiden-Fauna Rwandas, Zentralafrika. Sisyphini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Lamellicornia). Senckenbergiana biologica, 72 (1 - 3), 119 - 137.","Schafer, P. & Fischer, E. (2001) Zur Scarabaeidenfauna Rwandas, Zentralafrika 2, Gymnopleurini und nachtrag Sisyphini, Mitteilungen des internationalen entomologischen Vereins supplement 9: 1 - 93.","Davis, A. L. V. (1997) Climatic and biogeographical associations of southern African dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae s. str.). african Journal of ecology, 35 (1): 10 - 38.","Gory, M. (1833) Monographie du genre Sisyphe. Mequignon-Marvis pere et fils, Paris. 1 - 15 p."]}

Sisyphus Latreille 1807 Latreille 1807: 79; Gory 1833: 1���15; Kolbe 1914: 317; Harold 1869: 984���5; P��ringuey 1901: 98���108; Gillet 1911: 22���25; Arrow 1909: 517���519; Arrow 1927: 456���465; Haaf 1955: 341���381; Balthasar 1968: 954, Ferreira 1972: 789���844; Paschalidis 1974b: 299���303; Endr��di 1983: 207���210; Sch��fer & Fischer 1992: 119���137; Sch��fer & Fischer 2001: 1���93; Montreuil 2014: 177���180; Montreuil 2015a: 91���100; Montreuil 2015b: 1���2; Montreuil 2015c: 1���13; Montreuil 2016: 167���174; Daniel et al. 2016: 67���74; Montreuil 2017: 1���22, Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on page 11, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Latreille, P. A. (1807) Genera Crustaceorum et Insectorum; Secundum ordinem Naturalem in familias disposita, inconubus exemplisque Plurimis Explicata. Tomus secundus Parisiis at Argentorati, apud Amand Konig, Bibliopolam, 1 - 280 pp.","Gory, M. (1833) Monographie du genre Sisyphe. Mequignon-Marvis pere et fils, Paris. 1 - 15 p.","Kolbe, H. J. (1914) Lieferung 3: Scarabaeiden. In: Shubotz, H. (Ed.), Wissenschaftliches Ergebnisse der Deutschen Zentral-Afrika-Expedition 1907 unter Fuhrung Adolf Friedrichs, Herzog zu Mecklenburg. Zoologie III, 5. Klinkhardt & Biermann, Leipzig, Germany, pp. 261 - 416.","Harold, E. von (1869). Scarabaeidae. Gemminger, M. and Harold, E. Catalogus Coleopterorum. bucusque descriptorum, synonymicus et systematics, autotribus, 4: 976 - 1346. http: // www. iucnredlist. org / static / categories _ criteria _ 3 _ 1 access on 2017.03. 23.","Peringuey, L. (1901) Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa. Transactions of the South African philosophical Society. Cape Town, 12: 1 - 563 (13 - 368).","Gillet, J. J. E. (1911) Scarabaeidae: Coprinae I. Coleopterorum Catalogus, 38: 1 - 263.","Arrow, G. J. (1909) On some new species of Coleoptera from Rhodesia and adjacent territories. The Annals and Magazine of natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology. London 8 (3): 517 - 523.","Arrow, G. J. (1927) Notes on the Coleopterous genus Sisyphus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, 9 (19): 456 - 465.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Balthasar, V. (1968) Neue Scarabaeiden-Arten, 129. Beitrag zur kenntnis der Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera). Beitrage zur Entomologie, 18: 953 - 958.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088.","Paschalidis, K. M. (1974 b) The identity of two species in the genus Sisyphus (Coleoptera: Scarbaeidae). Journal of Entomology of Southern Africa. 37 (2): 299 - 303.","Endrodi, S. (1983) Sisyphus bornemisszanus sp. n. from South Africa (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae): Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationali S Hungarici (74): 207 - 210.","Schafer, P., & Fischer, E. (1992) Zur Scarabaeiden-Fauna Rwandas, Zentralafrika. Sisyphini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Lamellicornia). Senckenbergiana biologica, 72 (1 - 3), 119 - 137.","Schafer, P. & Fischer, E. (2001) Zur Scarabaeidenfauna Rwandas, Zentralafrika 2, Gymnopleurini und nachtrag Sisyphini, Mitteilungen des internationalen entomologischen Vereins supplement 9: 1 - 93.","Montreuil, O. (2014) Deux nouveaux Sisyphus Latreille de Tanzanie (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 119 (2): 177 - 180.","Montreuil, O. (2015 a) Nouveaux Sisyphus Latreille d'afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 120 (1): 91 - 102.","Montreuil, O. (2015 b) Le genre Neosisyphus Muller em Afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Catharsius La Revue, 12 (1): 1 - 36.","Montreuil, O. (2015 c) Premiers cas de brachypterisme dans le genre Sisyphus Latreille (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Annales de la Societe entomologique de France, 51 (4): 281 - 293.","Montreuil, O. (2016) Nouveaux Sisyphus Latreille, 1807, du groupe seminulum: le complexe arboreus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 121 (2): 167 - 174.","Daniel, G. M., Davis, A. L. V, & Scholtz, C. H. (2016) Three new Sisyphus species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from shaded vegetation in southern Africa. Zootaxa, 4147 (1): 67 - 74.","Montreuil, O. (2017) Nouveaux Sisyphus Latreille africains du groupe seminulum: les complexes seminulum, desaegeri et ocellatus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini), Catharsius La Revue, 14: 1 - 22."]}

Sisyphus neobornemisszanus Daniel & Davis, 2016 (Fig. 2, 3B). Daniel et. al. 2016: 67, 71, 73 Type locality: Zululand, St. Lucia (South Africa). Size: Male: length: 9.7– 7.6 mm, width: 5.6– 4.6 mm. Female: length: 10.0–8.0 mm, width 5.62– 4.4 mm. Diagnosis: S. neobornemisszanus resembles S. muricatus. However, it may be distinguished by the following combination of features: inconspicuous punctation on the pronotum; interstriae 1, 3, 5, and 7 with rows of black setae arranged in tufts; interstriae 2, 4, and 6 with sparsely arranged single setae. Examined type material (♂ TMSA) Holotype: SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, St. Lucia 28°13’12”S 32°15’00”E, 7.xii.1975, leg: Endrödy-Younga. Paratypes: (1♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, Mission Rock, 28°15’36”S 32°17’24”E, 7.xii.1975, legs: Endrödy-Younga. (2♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, St. Lucia 28°13’12”S 32°15’00”E, 28.viii.1971. leg. GF. Bornemissza. (2♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, St. Lucia, Estuary. 28.viii.1971, leg: GF. Bornemissza. (15♂, 13♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, Sodwana Bay, 5 km, 27°21’0”S 32°23’24”E, 2.xi.1992, leg. Endrödy-Younga. (1♀ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN. Richard’s Bay, 28°37’39”S 32°17’24”E, 27.i.2000, leg: Davis & Delport. (2♀, 6♂ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Richard’s Bay, 28°43’28”S 32°10’52”E, 27.i.2000, leg: Davis & Delport. (5♀, 2♂ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN. Sileza Nature Reserve 27°06’S 32°36’E, 03.iv.1996, leg: Van Rensburg. (1♀ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Sodwana, 27°32’S 32°41’E, 07.iv.1989, leg: Mansfield. (2♀, 5♂ UPSA) MOZAMBIQUE, Maputo, Elephant Maputo Reserve, 26°22’30”S 33°47’50”E, 14–16.i.2003, leg: Scholtz & Holter. (2♀ UPSA) MOZAM- BIQUE, Maputo, Elephant Maputo Reserve, 26°39’S 32°43’E, 10–16.xi.2007, pitfall trap, leg: Strümpher & Deschodt. (2♂ TMSA) MOZAMBIQUE, Inhambane, Inharrime, 24°28’37”S 35°01’49”E, 1974, leg: Moor. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: S. neobornemisszanus is an endemic, east coastal, dune forest species (Davis et al. 2002b). It has been recorded in the Maputaland Coastal Forest Mosaic (Olson et al. 2001) from KwaZulu Natal to southern Mozambique (Endrödi, 1983, Davis et al. 2002; Daniel et al. 2016) (Fig. 4).

Neosisyphus fortuitus (P��ringuey, 1901) (Figs. 20, 21A) Sisyphus fortuitus P��ringuey, 1901 P��ringuey 1901: 103; Arrow 1927: 464; Gillet 1911: 23; Haaf 1955: 371; Ferreira 1972: 819; Montreuil 2015b: 9. Type locality: Durban, Natal (South Africa) Size: Male: length: 11.1���9.0 mm; width: 5.7���5.0 mm. Female: length: 11.5���9.0 mm; width: 6.0��� 4.4 mm. Diagnosis: Neosisyphus fortuitus is distinguished from other members of the spinipes species group in southern Africa by lacking a spine or projection on the mid-posterior edge of the metafemur. In addition, the projecting metatrochanter is almost �� of the length of the metafemur in major males. The parameres are distinctly different to those of the other two species within the group (Fig. 21A). Examined type material Lectotype: (1♂ SAM) /Natal, Durban/ (red label) / S. fortuitus P��r, Lectotype, det. E. Haaf, 1954/. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: N. fortuitus occurs in shaded vegetation in southern (South Africa, Mozambique, Zimbabwe) and East Africa (Kenya) (Fig. 22)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 47-48, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Peringuey, L. (1901) Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa. Transactions of the South African philosophical Society. Cape Town, 12: 1 - 563 (13 - 368).","Arrow, G. J. (1927) Notes on the Coleopterous genus Sisyphus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, 9 (19): 456 - 465.","Gillet, J. J. E. (1911) Scarabaeidae: Coprinae I. Coleopterorum Catalogus, 38: 1 - 263.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088.","Montreuil, O. (2015 b) Le genre Neosisyphus Muller em Afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Catharsius La Revue, 12 (1): 1 - 36."]}

Sisyphus goryi Harold 1859 (Figs. 5, 6D). Harold 1859:224; Harold 1869:984; P��ringuey 1902:106���7; Kolbe 1914: 317; Arrow 1927:460; Haaf 1955:362���3; Ferreira 1972:797; Sch��fer & Fischer 2001:53���4; Sch��fer & Fischer 1992:121���2. Sisyphus hirtus Wiedeman, 1823 Wiedeman 1823:21; Gory 1833:14; Harold 1869:984; Arrow 1909:518���9; 1927:460; Haaf 1995:362���3; Sch��fer & Fischer 2001:53���4; Sch��fer & Fischer 1992:121���2. S. pygmaeus Dejean, 1837 Dejean 1837: 151; Klug, 1862:219; Harold 1869:984; Haaf 1955:362���3. Type locality: Senegal Size: Male: length: 7���4.0 mm, width: 3.4��� 2.2 mm. Female: Length: 7.0��� 3.9 mm, width: 3.1��� 2.4 mm. Diagnosis: S. goryi is similar to Sisyphus bicuariensis sp. n. However, it differs by the uniform brown colour of the setae compared to the bicoloured setae in S. bicuariensis sp. n. The male genitalia of both species differ (Figs. 6 A, D). Furthermore, it should be noted that larger S. goryi specimens resemble those of S. caffer. However, S. goryi bears well-developed tufts of setae, which emanate from below the abdominal epipleurae (Fig. 5H) (>10 single setae), which differ to those in S. caffer where the tufts consist of few single setae (Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Morphological variation Head. Antennal club varies in colour between brown or black. Clypeus. In some specimens, especially old ones, the lateral edge of the clypeus is worn completely smooth; the third indentation is absent; and the medial surface bears a metallic sheen. Sternites. Some populations are completely hairless on the latero-posterior edge of the mesosternum. Pygidium. Setae are evenly distributed in some individuals whereas in others they are arranged in a trident pattern. Populations from highlands and areas of shaded vegetation, such as Inyanga (Zimbabwe), Manyara (Tanzania) and Meru (Kenya) are distinctly larger in size and may, in some cases, resemble S. caffer. Distribution: S. goryi is widespread in the Afrotropical region and is associated with a great range of habitats from shaded to open vegetation. Moreover, it has been recorded at a range of different altitudes (Fig. 7). The geographical distribution and morphological variation suggest a species complex. However, as we could not access the type material of S. goryi, the putative species complex currently remains undetermined pending further study. Remarks: The original name of Sisyphus hirtus Gory, 1833, is preoccupied by Sisyphus hirtus Wiedmann, 1825 (Indian species). Gory���s junior homonym was, therefore, renamed as Sisyphus goryi Harold, 1859. Subsequently, P��ringuey (1901) synonymized S. caffer Boheman, 1857, and S. sordidus Boheman, 1857, with S. goryi, whereas, Haaf (1955) and Ferreira (1972) synonymized S. goryi with S. crispatus Gory, 1833. Based on morphological and biogeographical evidence we have, here, revalidated S. caffer, S. sordidus and S. goryi following the unpublished revision of Paschalidis (1974)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on page 23, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Harold, E. von (1859) Beitrage zur Kenntniss einiger coprophagen Lamellicornien. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 3 (2 - 3), 193 - 224.","Harold, E. von (1869). Scarabaeidae. Gemminger, M. and Harold, E. Catalogus Coleopterorum. bucusque descriptorum, synonymicus et systematics, autotribus, 4: 976 - 1346. http: // www. iucnredlist. org / static / categories _ criteria _ 3 _ 1 access on 2017.03. 23.","Kolbe, H. J. (1914) Lieferung 3: Scarabaeiden. In: Shubotz, H. (Ed.), Wissenschaftliches Ergebnisse der Deutschen Zentral-Afrika-Expedition 1907 unter Fuhrung Adolf Friedrichs, Herzog zu Mecklenburg. Zoologie III, 5. Klinkhardt & Biermann, Leipzig, Germany, pp. 261 - 416.","Arrow, G. J. (1927) Notes on the Coleopterous genus Sisyphus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, 9 (19): 456 - 465.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088.","Schafer, P. & Fischer, E. (2001) Zur Scarabaeidenfauna Rwandas, Zentralafrika 2, Gymnopleurini und nachtrag Sisyphini, Mitteilungen des internationalen entomologischen Vereins supplement 9: 1 - 93.","Schafer, P., & Fischer, E. (1992) Zur Scarabaeiden-Fauna Rwandas, Zentralafrika. Sisyphini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Lamellicornia). Senckenbergiana biologica, 72 (1 - 3), 119 - 137.","Wiedemann, C. K. W. (1823) Zweihundert neue Kafer von Java, Bengalen und dem Vorgebirge der guten Hoffnung. Zoologisches Magazin, 2 (1): 3 - 133.","Gory, M. (1833) Monographie du genre Sisyphe. Mequignon-Marvis pere et fils, Paris. 1 - 15 p.","Arrow, G. J. (1909) On some new species of Coleoptera from Rhodesia and adjacent territories. The Annals and Magazine of natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology. London 8 (3): 517 - 523.","Dejean, P. F. (1837) Catalogue des Coleopteres de la collection de M. le Comte Dejean. Mequignon-Marvis.","Peringuey, L. (1901) Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa. Transactions of the South African philosophical Society. Cape Town, 12: 1 - 563 (13 - 368).","Boheman, C. H. (1857) Insecta Caffrariae annis 1838 - 1845 a JA Wahlberg collecta. Pars. II. Coleoptera (Scarabaeides). Holmiae: Offieina Nordstedtiana. - 395 pp, 1.","Paschalidis, K. M. (1974 a) The genus Sisyphus Latr. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Southern Africa. MSc. Thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa, 183 pp."]}

Sisyphus gazanus Arrow, 1909 (Figs. 11, 12C). Arrow 1909: 518; Gillet 1911: 23; Arrow 1927: 461; Haaf 1955: 361; Ferreira 1972: 799; Sch��fer & Fischer 1992: 129. Type locality: Chirinda, Mashonaland (Zimbabwe) Size: Male: length: 5��� 4.5 mm; width: 3.1��� 2.5 mm; Female: length: 5��� 4.4 mm, width 3.1��� 2.4 mm. Diagnosis: S. gazanus is relatively close in appearance to S. inconspicuus sp. n. However, it is easily distinguished by a combination of features as follows: S. gazanus has a somewhat shallow depression dorsally on the genae; the dorsal surface of the head (vertex and frons) is entirely covered by distinct ocellate punctures (Fig. 11J); the pronotal disc shows a patchwork of bald areas and sparse short setae. In addition, the parameres of both species are distinctly different (Figs. 12 C���D). Examined type material Lectotype: (♂ NHML): ZIMBABWE, Mashonaland, Chirinda, 05.x.1908. Leg: Marshall (handwritten Sisyphus gazanus Arrow 1909), lectotype det: Bacchus, 1976 / violet label /. Paralectotype: (♂ NHML): ZIMBABWE, Mashonaland, Mt. Chirinda, 01.xii.1908, leg: Marshall (handwritten Sisyphus gazanus Arrow 1909), lectotype det: Bacchus, 1976; /blue label/. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: Sisyphus gazanus is associated with cooler conditions in highland forest in Zimbabwe and Malawi. It was described from Mount Chirinda (Zimbabwe) at the southern end of the Inyanga Highlands and Chimanimani Mountains. This range may have acted as a corridor into Malawi where the species has also been recorded from Mount Mulanje and Mount Gomoloti (Fig. 13). So far, it has not been recorded under cooler, shaded conditions on the intervening Muchinga Mountains (Manica, Mozambique) or Mount Binga (19.78��S 33.30��E)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 30-31, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Arrow, G. J. (1909) On some new species of Coleoptera from Rhodesia and adjacent territories. The Annals and Magazine of natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology. London 8 (3): 517 - 523.","Gillet, J. J. E. (1911) Scarabaeidae: Coprinae I. Coleopterorum Catalogus, 38: 1 - 263.","Arrow, G. J. (1927) Notes on the Coleopterous genus Sisyphus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, 9 (19): 456 - 465.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088.","Schafer, P., & Fischer, E. (1992) Zur Scarabaeiden-Fauna Rwandas, Zentralafrika. Sisyphini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Lamellicornia). Senckenbergiana biologica, 72 (1 - 3), 119 - 137."]}

Neosisyphus calcaratus (Klug, 1855) (Figs. 17, 18B) Montreuil 2015b: 15 Sisyphus calcaratus Klug, 1855 Klug 1855: 651; Harold 1869: 984; Arrow 1927: 464; Boucomont 1933: 3; Haaf 1955: 377, Ferreira 1972: 829. Sisyphus rubripes Boheman, 1857 Boheman 1857:193 Size: Male: length: 7.1��� 6.6 mm; width: 4.5���3.0 mm. Female: length: 7.0��� 6.5 mm; width: 4.0��� 3.8 mm. Type locality: Sena (Sofala, Mozambique). Diagnosis: N. calcaratus is similar to N. barbarossa. Males of both species bear a sharp pointed spine on the mid-posterior edge of the metafemur, which is absent in the female. However, the elytra of N. calcaratus bear black setae that are bent over at the tip whilst the elytra of N. barbarossa are covered by brown setae. Furthermore, compared to N. barbarossa, major males of N. calcaratus are smaller but the projection of the metatrochanter is twice as long. Examined type material Sisyphus rubripes Boheman, 1857 : (1♀ NHRS): / Caffraria /, / Typus /; / rubripes Bohem /; / Sisyphus rubripes Boh =armatus Gory, det. E. Haaf, 1954/; / Sisyphus calcarutus Klug, det. KM, Paschalidis 1975/; /NHRS_JLKB: 000025221. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: N. calcaratus has been recorded in dry lowland savanna and mixed woodland in the lowveld of South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe and Swaziland. It has also been observed on the coastal plain and interior of southern central Mozambique (Fig. 19)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on page 44, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Klug, J. C. F. (1855) Diagnosen neuer Coleoptera aus Mossambique. Bericht uber die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Koniglichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 643 - 660.","Montreuil, O. (2015 b) Le genre Neosisyphus Muller em Afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Catharsius La Revue, 12 (1): 1 - 36.","Harold, E. von (1869). Scarabaeidae. Gemminger, M. and Harold, E. Catalogus Coleopterorum. bucusque descriptorum, synonymicus et systematics, autotribus, 4: 976 - 1346. http: // www. iucnredlist. org / static / categories _ criteria _ 3 _ 1 access on 2017.03. 23.","Arrow, G. J. (1927) Notes on the Coleopterous genus Sisyphus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, 9 (19): 456 - 465.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088.","Boheman, C. H. (1857) Insecta Caffrariae annis 1838 - 1845 a JA Wahlberg collecta. Pars. II. Coleoptera (Scarabaeides). Holmiae: Offieina Nordstedtiana. - 395 pp, 1."]}

Sisyphus fasciculatus Boheman 1857 (Figs. 2, 3C) Boheman 1857: 192; Harold 1869: 984; P��ringuey 1902: 101���106, Arrow 1927: 465; Haaf 1955: 376; Ferreira 1972: 799; Davis et al, 2008: 154; Montreuil 2015c: 3, 11. Type locality: Caffraria Size: Male: length: 9.4��� 7 mm, width: 5.7��� 3.5 mm. Female: length: 9.0���7.0 mm, width 5.6��� 3.5 mm. Diagnosis: S. fasciculatus is similar to S. muricatus and S. neobornemisszanus, but differs from these two species by bearing tufts of dense setae on the pronotum, which alternate with bare patches of short setae. Examined type material Holotype (photograph): (♀ NHRS): / Caffraria /, / J. Wahlb /, / type /, brown label, handwritten / fasciculatus Bohem /; red label / Typus: Sisyphus fasciculatus, det. Dr. E. Haaf, 1954/, /311:72/, /247:73/; /9415 E92 +/, brown label, handwritten / fasciculatus Boh /, /NHRS-SRAH 000000228/. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: S. fasciculatus occurs in South Africa and Swaziland where it is a shade specialist (Davis et al. 1999). It is associated with riverine and lower hillside forest to dense partially shaded woodland thickets, particularly, on the eastern escarpment of Limpopo, Mpumalanga, west KwaZulu Natal and Swaziland. However, it also occurs in the warmer inland parts of the Maputaland Coastal Forest Mosaic ecoregion of Olson et al. (2001) southwards to the northernmost extent of the KwaZulu-Pondoland Coastal Forest Mosaic (Fig. 4). Conservation status: Although currently assessed as Least Concern (LC), S. fasciculatus is a potentially threatened species, due to the loss of forest and shaded woodland across its fairly restricted range (Davis 2013a). However, the species has been recorded in reserves where shaded vegetation is protected, such as in Hluhluwe, Umfolozi and Ithala Game Reserves (KwaZulu Natal) as well as Mlawula Nature Reserve (Swaziland). Because of this protection, it can be locally abundant in both coastal reserves and along the lower part of the northern escarpment of the Drakensberg., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 13-15, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Boheman, C. H. (1857) Insecta Caffrariae annis 1838 - 1845 a JA Wahlberg collecta. Pars. II. Coleoptera (Scarabaeides). Holmiae: Offieina Nordstedtiana. - 395 pp, 1.","Harold, E. von (1869). Scarabaeidae. Gemminger, M. and Harold, E. Catalogus Coleopterorum. bucusque descriptorum, synonymicus et systematics, autotribus, 4: 976 - 1346. http: // www. iucnredlist. org / static / categories _ criteria _ 3 _ 1 access on 2017.03. 23.","Arrow, G. J. (1927) Notes on the Coleopterous genus Sisyphus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, 9 (19): 456 - 465.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088.","Davis, A. L. V., Frolov, A. V., & Scholtz, C. H. (2008) The African dung beetle genera. Protea Book House. 148 - 155 pp.","Montreuil, O. (2015 c) Premiers cas de brachypterisme dans le genre Sisyphus Latreille (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Annales de la Societe entomologique de France, 51 (4): 281 - 293.","Davis, A. L. V., Scholtz, C. H., & Chown, S. L. (1999) Species turnover, community boundaries and biogeographical composition of dung beetle assemblages across an altitudinal gradient in South Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 26 (5): 1039 - 1055.","Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V., Underwood, E. C., & Loucks, C. J. (2001) Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience, 51 (11): 933 - 938.","Davis, A. L. V. (2013 a) Sisyphus fasciculatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e. T 137250 A 522146. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.2305 / IUCN. UK. 20132. RLTS. T 137250 A 522146. en. (accessed 07 September 2016)."]}

Neosisyphus rubrus (Paschalidis, 1974) (Figs. 29, 30B) Montreuil 2015b: 20, 28 Sisyphus rubrus Paschalidis 1974 Paschalidis, 1974b: 299 Type locality: Castle Gorge (South Africa) Size: Male: length: 9.0���6.0 mm; width: 4.1���3.0 mm. Female: length: 8.7���6.0 mm; width: 4.0���3.0 mm. Diagnosis: N. rubrus closely resembles N. macrorubrus (Paschalidis 1974). However, the species can be distinguished by the lateral protrusions at the apices of the parameres in N. rubrus (Fig. 30B), which are lacking in N. macrorubrus. Examined type material Holotype: (♂ SANC) / SOUTH AFRICA, TVL, Castle Gorge (42 mi W Pretoria), 15.v.1971, leg: Bornemissza & Insley /; /283a/, /ex coll. CSIRO, Div. Entomology; S. African Station /; red label / Holotype ♂, Sisyphus rubrus spec. nov, det. KM Paschalidis, 1974 /, white label / SANC TYPH 00723/. Paratypes: (5 ♂, 1 ♀ SAM) / RHODESIA, Sebakwe /, / Sisyphus rubripes P��r, det. Dr. Haaf, 1954/. (15♂, 15 ♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, TVL, Castle Gorge (42 mi W Pretoria), 15.v.1971, leg: Bornemissza & Insley. (2♂, 1 ♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, OFS, Vredefort (20 mi S), 03.xi.1971, leg: Bornemissza & Kirk. (3♂, 5 ♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, CP, Mafeking, 22.v.1972, leg: Davis. (2♂, 1 ♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, SE. TVL, Bergen, 1.v.1972, leg: Kirk. (1♂, 5 ♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRI- CA, N. TVL, Louis Trichardt (11 mi N), 14.xii.1971, leg: Olsen. (2♂, 1 ♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, CP, Aliwal North (22 mi S), 4.iii.1971, leg: Aschenborn, (50♂, 47 ♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, E. TVL, Bosbokrand (5 mi N), 6.ii.1971, leg: Olsen. (2♂, 3♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, Transkei, Umtata (10 mi N), 19.v.1971, leg: Aschenborn. (1♂, 2♀ SANC) MOZAMBIQUE, Vila Pery, (5 mi E), 10.iv.1971, leg: Bornemissza & Aschenborn. (1♂ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, Vryburg, N. CP, (15 mi E, Leeuwrand Farm), 7.x.1972, leg: Kluge. Sisyphus rubripes P��ringuey, 1901 : Lectotype: (♂ SAM) /Natal, Durban/; / Sisyphus rubripes P��r, det. Dr. Haaf, 1954/; red label / Sisyphus rubripes P��r, Lectotype, det: E. Haaf, 1954/. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: N. rubrus is distributed in upland and coastal, moist grassland and savanna (Davis et al. 1999) in southeast Africa (Fig. 31). Conservation status: N. macrorubrus and N. rubrus are listed as Least Concern species on the IUCN Red Data List (Davis 2013 e, f). Remarks: It has been suggested that on grounds of gender, the spelling of N. rubrus and N. macrorubrus should be changed to N. ruber and N. macroruber respectively (Davis et. al. 1999; Davis et al. 2008, Davis 2013 e, f). It should be noted that; ��� ruber ��� is a masculine classical adjective, which has been used in a rare case as an alternative form of ��� rubrus ��� (Brown, 1954). However, the original description of each species does not specify the etymological meaning of the specific name ��� rubrus ��� (Paschalidis, 1974 b). According to ICZN (article: 31.2.2) ���Where the author of a species-group name did not indicate whether he or she regarded it as a noun or as an adjective, and where it may be regarded as either and the evidence of usage is not decisive, it is to be treated as a noun in apposition to the name of its genus���. Therefore, rubrus and macrorubrus must be treated as indeclinable names., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 56-57, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Paschalidis, K. M. (1974 a) The genus Sisyphus Latr. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Southern Africa. MSc. Thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa, 183 pp.","Montreuil, O. (2015 b) Le genre Neosisyphus Muller em Afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Catharsius La Revue, 12 (1): 1 - 36.","Paschalidis, K. M. (1974 b) The identity of two species in the genus Sisyphus (Coleoptera: Scarbaeidae). Journal of Entomology of Southern Africa. 37 (2): 299 - 303.","Peringuey, L. (1901) Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa. Transactions of the South African philosophical Society. Cape Town, 12: 1 - 563 (13 - 368).","Davis, A. L. V., Scholtz, C. H., & Chown, S. L. (1999) Species turnover, community boundaries and biogeographical composition of dung beetle assemblages across an altitudinal gradient in South Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 26 (5): 1039 - 1055.","Davis, A. L. V. (2013 e) Neosisyphus rubrus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e. T 137480 A 525709. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.2305 / IUCN. UK. 20132. RLTS. T 137480 A 525709. en. (accessed 07 September 2016).","Davis, A. L. V., Frolov, A. V., & Scholtz, C. H. (2008) The African dung beetle genera. Protea Book House. 148 - 155 pp."]}

Sisyphus neobornemisszanus Daniel & Davis, 2016 (Fig. 2, 3B). Daniel et. al. 2016: 67, 71, 73 Type locality: Zululand, St. Lucia (South Africa). Size: Male: length: 9.7��� 7.6 mm, width: 5.6��� 4.6 mm. Female: length: 10.0���8.0 mm, width 5.62��� 4.4 mm. Diagnosis: S. neobornemisszanus resembles S. muricatus. However, it may be distinguished by the following combination of features: inconspicuous punctation on the pronotum; interstriae 1, 3, 5, and 7 with rows of black setae arranged in tufts; interstriae 2, 4, and 6 with sparsely arranged single setae. Examined type material (♂ TMSA) Holotype: SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, St. Lucia 28��13���12���S 32��15���00���E, 7.xii.1975, leg: Endr��dy-Younga. Paratypes: (1♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, Mission Rock, 28��15���36���S 32��17���24���E, 7.xii.1975, legs: Endr��dy-Younga. (2♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, St. Lucia 28��13���12���S 32��15���00���E, 28.viii.1971. leg. GF. Bornemissza. (2♂ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, St. Lucia, Estuary. 28.viii.1971, leg: GF. Bornemissza. (15♂, 13♀ TMSA) SOUTH AFRICA, Zululand, Sodwana Bay, 5 km, 27��21���0���S 32��23���24���E, 2.xi.1992, leg. Endr��dy-Younga. (1♀ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN. Richard���s Bay, 28��37���39���S 32��17���24���E, 27.i.2000, leg: Davis & Delport. (2♀, 6♂ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Richard���s Bay, 28��43���28���S 32��10���52���E, 27.i.2000, leg: Davis & Delport. (5♀, 2♂ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN. Sileza Nature Reserve 27��06���S 32��36���E, 03.iv.1996, leg: Van Rensburg. (1♀ UPSA) SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Sodwana, 27��32���S 32��41���E, 07.iv.1989, leg: Mansfield. (2♀, 5♂ UPSA) MOZAMBIQUE, Maputo, Elephant Maputo Reserve, 26��22���30���S 33��47���50���E, 14���16.i.2003, leg: Scholtz & Holter. (2♀ UPSA) MOZAM- BIQUE, Maputo, Elephant Maputo Reserve, 26��39���S 32��43���E, 10���16.xi.2007, pitfall trap, leg: Str��mpher & Deschodt. (2♂ TMSA) MOZAMBIQUE, Inhambane, Inharrime, 24��28���37���S 35��01���49���E, 1974, leg: Moor. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: S. neobornemisszanus is an endemic, east coastal, dune forest species (Davis et al. 2002b). It has been recorded in the Maputaland Coastal Forest Mosaic (Olson et al. 2001) from KwaZulu Natal to southern Mozambique (Endr��di, 1983, Davis et al. 2002; Daniel et al. 2016) (Fig. 4)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 12-13, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Daniel, G. M., Davis, A. L. V, & Scholtz, C. H. (2016) Three new Sisyphus species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from shaded vegetation in southern Africa. Zootaxa, 4147 (1): 67 - 74.","Davis, A. L. V., Van Aarde, R. J., Scholtz, C. H., & Delport, J. H. (2002 b). Increasing representation of localized dung beetles across a chronosequence of regenerating vegetation and natural dune forest in South Africa. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11 (3): 191 - 209.","Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V., Underwood, E. C., & Loucks, C. J. (2001) Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience, 51 (11): 933 - 938.","Endrodi, S. (1983) Sisyphus bornemisszanus sp. n. from South Africa (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae): Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationali S Hungarici (74): 207 - 210.","Davis, A. L. V., Scholtz, C. H., & Philips, T. K. (2002 a) Historical biogeography of scarabaeine dung beetles. Journal of Biogeography, 29 (9): 1217 - 1256."]}

Identification key for males of southern African sisyphine species 1. Lateral ridge on the pronotal disc extends from the posterior margin without reaching the lateral margin (Fig. 1F); strong setae absent on the external margin of the first meso- and metatarsal segments (Fig. 1D)........................ Neosisyphus (2) ��� Lateral prothoracic ridge between pronotal disc and prothoracic episternum complete (Fig. 1E); first tarsal segments of the meso- and meta-thoracic legs with a row of dense setae in a straight line on the external edge (Fig. 1C)........................................................................................................................... Sisyphus (13) 2. Mesotibia strongly modified by indentations and protrusions; a large spine distally on the posterior margin of the mesofemur. Completely black, pygidium simple and lacking a pair of distinct tubercles. Eastern coastal forests of South Africa and South Mozambique................................................................................................................(tibialis species-group; Neosisyphus mirabilis (Arrow,1927) (Figs. 23, 24A) ��� Mesotibia simple, without any spine projected distally on the posterior margin of the mesofemur.................................................................................................(3) 3. Femur and tibia of mesolegs without cuticular projections on the posterior margin............................................. barbarossa species-group (Figs. 17 A���D) (4) ��� Femur and tibia of mesolegs with cuticular projections on the posterior margin...(7) 4. Metafemur with sharp pointed spine on the mid-posterior margin (Figs. 17 A���B)........................................................................................................................(5) ��� Metafemur with angled-protuberance on the mid-posterior margin (Figs. 17 C���D)........................................................................................................................(6) 5. Projecting metatrochanter longer than �� of the metafemur length in major males and �� of the metafemur length in minor males. In major males the metatrochant- er is slightly inwardly-curved at the tip and straight in minor males; setae on the elytra black, recurved at the apex. Lowland dry savannas in southern Africa.................................................. Neosisyphus calcaratus (Klug, 1855) (Figs. 17, 18B) ��� Projecting metatrochanter shorter in minor males ( Neosisyphus barbarossa (Wiedemann, 1823) (Figs. 17, 18A) 6. Projecting metatrochanter relatively short; four times shorter than total length of metafemur. Lowland and upland moist vegetation from northeast to southern Africa..................................... Neosisyphus setiger (Roth, 1851) (Figs. 17, 18D) ��� Metatrochanter slighty inwardly-projected at the apex, metatrochanter projection is �� the length of the metafemur. Upland woodland in southern Angola............................................. Neosisyphus tembyi Daniel & Davis sp. n (Figs. 17, 18C) 7. Posterior margin of the mesoleg with spine or projection distally on mesofemur and basally on mesotibia; first quarter of mesotibia from femoro-tibial joint abruptly narrowed................................ spinipes species-group (Figs. 20 A���C) (8) ��� Mesotibial spine projecting posteriorly and gradually narrowing distally........(10) 8. Spine present on the mid-posterior margin of the metafemur; metatrochanter relatively short, �� of the metafemur length........................................................... (9) ��� Spine absent on posterior margin of the metafemur; metatrochanter is �� the length of the metafemur in major males. Shaded vegetation and thickets from east to southern Africa........ Neosisyphus fortuitus (P��ringuey, 1901) (Figs. 20, 21A) 9. Distinct triangular shaped projection present on the basal posterior margin of the mesotibia. Parameres not curved at the apex (Fig. 21C). Moist upland and coastal grassland from east to southern Africa............................................................................................................. Neosisyphus spinipes (Thunberg, 1818) (Fig. 20C) ��� Lacking a triangular protuberance on the basal posterior margin of the mesotibia in minor males. There is a slight sinuosity in major males. Parameres curved downward apically (Fig. 21B). Lowland dry savanna from east to southern Africa................................................. Neosisyphus infuscatus (Klug, 1855) (Fig. 20B) 10. Basal posterior spine on mesotibia projecting perpendicularly; body uniformly brown; size of beetles 6.0��� 10 mm......... rubrus species-group (Figs. 29 A���B) (11) ��� Basal posterior spine on mesotibia not projecting perpendicularly to the ventral apical margin of the femur; colour is not uniform overall, size of beetles 11.0��� 13.5 mm...................................... quadricollis species-group (Figs. 25 A���B) (12) 11. Parameres with protrusion apical-laterally (Fig. 30B). Upland and coastal moist grassland and savanna in southern Africa......................................................................................................... Neosisyphus rubrus (Paschalidis, 1974) (Fig. 29B) ��� Parameres simple (Fig. 30A). Cool, dry savanna, karoo and grassland in South Africa (Northern Cape and Free State) and Namibia (Etosha Pan, Okaukuejo)..................................... Neosisyphus macrorubrus (Paschalidis, 1974) (Fig. 29A) 12. Lateral margin of elytra emarginate; concavity of margin distinctly deep in the middle; short projecting metatrochanter in males (1/3 of metafemur length); metafemur lacking spines. Deep sands and shrubland of southwest coast, and karoo in the Eastern Cape (South Africa)................................................................................................... Neosisyphus quadricollis (Gory, 1833) (Figs. 26, 27A) ��� Margin of elytra with regular shape; a protuberance distally on the posterior margin of the metafemur, the metatrochanter exceeds �� the length of the metafemur in males. Moist highland grassland in South Africa............................................................................................. Neosisyphus kuehni (Haaf, 1955) (Figs. 26, 27B) 13. Setae on the elytral interstriae arranged in tufts............................................................................................................. muricatus species-group (Figs. 2 A���F) (14) ��� Setae on the elytral interstriae evenly distributed, not grouped in tufts.......... (20) 14. Setae arranged in tufts on the pronotum, which alternate with depressed bare patches.......................................................................................................... (15) ��� Setae on the pronotum not arranged in tufts................................................. (17) 15. Concave and upwardly curved margin between the anterior medial teeth of the clypeus; macropterous (Fig. 2I). Woodland thickets and forest in north South Africa and Swaziland.......... Sisyphus fasciculatus Boheman, 1857 (Figs. 2, 3C) ��� Anterior margin between medial clypeal teeth not upcurved; hind wings reduced or completely brachypterous (Figs. 2 H���J).....................................................(16) 16. Anterior margin between medial clypeal teeth concave; pronotum wider anteriorly than posteriorly. Parameres (Fig. 3F). Only known from Swaziland........................................................................ Sisyphus swazi Daniel & Davis sp. n (Fig. 2F) ��� Straight edge between medial teeth of clypeus; width of pronotum uniform from anterior to posterior margins. Parameres (Fig. 3G). Popa Falls forest (Namibia), Central Mozambique and East Africa.................................................................................................................... Sisyphus alveatus Boucomont, 1935 (Fig. 2G) 17. Very strong lateral emargination and distinct shiny punctation on pronotum. Cooler southern forest and montane grassland in South Africa............................................................................ Sisyphus muricatus (Olivier, 1789) (Figs. 2, 3A) ��� No distinct lateral emargination on the pronotum.........................................(18) 18. Punctation on the pronotum unclear; interstriae 1, 3, 5, and 7 with rows of black setae arranged in tufts, interstriae 2, 4, and 6 with sparsely arranged single setae. Coastal sand forest of northeast South Africa and southeast Mozambique................................ Sisyphus neobornemisszanus Daniel & Davis, 2016 (Figs. 2, 3B) ��� Punctation on the pronotum conspicuous; setae on pronotal disc arise from the centre of ocellate punctures (Fig. 5H)............................................................(19) 19. Proximal elytral setae evenly arranged; mid-basal elytral setae arranged in tufts of scattered individual setae. Pronotal disc with three prominent round depressions. Parameres (Fig. 3E). Primarily upland and highland grassland in Gauteng, Kwa- Zulu Natal, Limpopo, Mpumalanga and Northwest Province..................................................................................... Sisyphus manni Montreuil, 2015 (Fig. 2E) ��� Elytra entirely covered in tufts of setae, each tuft dense and compact; depressions on the pronotal disc absent; body larger than S. manni and oval. Parameres (Fig. 3D). Unshaded vegetation in the Eastern Cape......................................................................................... Sisyphus perissinottoi Montreuil, 2015 (Fig. 2D) 20. Well-developed tufts of epipleural setae (Fig. 5H); edge between medial teeth almost straight; setae on the pronotum evenly distributed........................................................................................................ goryi species-group (Figs. 5 A���E) (22) ��� Weak tufts of epipleural setae; margin between medial teeth V-shaped)................................................................................................. umbraphilus species-group 21. Pronotal disc with setae interspersed with bald patches. Dense woodland and thicket in KwaZulu Natal, Gauteng and North West Provinces (South Africa)......................................... Sisyphus umbraphilus Daniel & Davis, 2016 (Fig. 8A) ��� Pronotal disc without clear setae interspersed with bald patches.................... (26) 22. Setae on the pronotum inserted between or on the posterior margin of ocellate punctures (Fig. 5F)........................................................................................ (23) ��� Setae on the pronotum inserted centrally on ocellate punctures.................................................................................................................................. (Fig. 5G) (25) 23. Fine setae on elytra arranged in single rows, epipleural tufts containing few setae ( Sisyphus caffer Boheman, 1857 (Figs. 5, 6B) ��� Much finer setae on elytra, distributed in single rows; epipleural tufts containing many setae (>10); elongate body shape..........................................................(24) 24. Setae on the pronotum and elytra of uniform colour and regularly arranged. Parameres (Fig. 6D). Widespread woodland species in sub-Saharan Africa................................................................................ Sisyphus goryi Harold, 1859 (Fig. 5D) ��� Setae on pronotum and elytra bicoloured (black and gray). Parameres (Fig. 6A). Open woodland in southern Angola........................................................................................................... Sisyphus bicuariensis Daniel & Davis, sp. n (Fig. 5A) 25. Elytral setae thick, arranged in non-single rows and forming bunches; body size: 6.6��� 4.4 mm. Open lowland vegetation in South Africa, Mozambique, and Zimbabwe....................................... Sisyphus sordidus Boheman, 1857 (Figs. 5, 6E) ��� Elytral setae fine, regularly arranged on interstriae; body size: 10���8.0 mm. East African miombo woodland; known only from Quirimbas National Park (Northern Mozambique)..................... Sisyphus genierorum Montreuil, 2015 (Figs. 5, 6C) 26. Setae on outer margin of elytra not arranged in tufts; margin between medial teeth concave or straight; very large ocellate punctures on dorsal surface of pronotal disc...................................................... costatus species-group (Figs. 11 A���E) (27) ��� Setae on outer margin of elytra not arranged in tufts; margin between medial teeth narrowed (almost V-shaped); very fine ocellate punctures on dorsal surface of pronotal disc......................................... seminulum species-group (Figs. 6 A���C) (30) 27. Dorsal surface of the clypeus and frons with inconspicuous ocellate punctation, but more visible on the vertex (Figs. 11 G���I).................................................. (28) ��� Dorsal surface of the head (clypeus, frons and vertex) with distinct ocellate punctation (Figure11J).......................................................................................... (30) 28. Vertex with dense ocellate punctation, margin between medial teeth straight; genae convex anteriorly (Fig. 11I); elytral setae fine and uniformly arranged. Moist savanna or dense woodland and riverine vegetation in the interior of South Africa. Shaded vegetation on coastline from Sofala Bay (Mozambique) to Eastern Cape (South Africa)................ Sisyphus inconspicuus Daniel & Davis, sp. n (Fig. 5B) ��� Vertex with scattered ocellate punctation (Fig. 11 G���H), elytral setae thicker, alternating on the interstriae between rows of well-developed and less developed setae (Fig. 11F)......................................................................................................(29) 29. Margin between medial teeth distinctly concave and upcurved; lacking carinae on the frons; genae virtually straight laterally (Fig. 11G). Parameres (Fig. 12B). Highland grassland in South Africa....................................................................................................................... Sisyphus costatus (Thunberg, 1818) (Fig. 11B) ��� Edge between medial teeth straight; well-defined clypeo-frontal carina; genal margin virtually convex (Fig. 11H). Parameres (Fig. 12E). Shaded vegetation from Western and Eastern Cape Provinces, South Africa.......................................................................................... Sisyphus australis Daniel & Davis sp. n (Fig. 11E) 30. Small-bodied; genae with shallow depression dorsally; pronotal disc showing distinct pattern of bare patches amongst sparse short setae; metafemur simple. Highland forest under cooler conditions in Zimbabwe and Malawi........................................................................ Sisyphus gazanus Arrow, 1907 (Figs. 11, 12C) ��� Large-bodied; genal depression absent; setae arranged regularly on pronotal disc; anvil- shaped projection on mid-posterior margin of metafemur. Lowland shaded Savanna from east to southern Africa..................................................................................................... Sisyphus impressipennis Lansberge, 1886 (Figs. 11, 12A) 31. Relatively large-bodied; pronotal disc with conspicuous metallic sheen; open woodland in north of Namibia and south of Angola............................................................................................ Sisyphus splendidus Montreuil, 2015 (Fig. 14A) ��� Relatively small to medium-bodied................................................................ (32) 32. Very small-sized body (3.0��� 3.8 mm); pronotal disc dull bearing some depressions. Shaded vegetation in eastern and southern Africa....................................................................................... Sisyphus nanniscus P��ringuey, 1901 (Figs. 14C, 15B) ��� Medium-sized body (3.9���5.0 mm)................................................................ (33) 33. Pronotal disc bears sparse, long and fine yellow setae, separated by linear bare patches (Fig. 14E); parameres notched dorsally (Fig. 15A). Dense coastal woodlands and forest from northeast South Africa to southern Mozambique........................................................ Sisyphus oralensis Daniel & Davis, 2016 (Fig. 14B) ��� Pronotum bears thick and short golden setae; directional projection of the setae well-defined (Fig. 14F); parameres without excavation dorsally, attenuating sharply at the apex (Fig. 15C). Forest and dense woodland species in central Mozambique................... Sisyphus auricomus Daniel & Davis sp. n (Fig. 14D), Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 5-9, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Arrow, G. J. (1927) Notes on the Coleopterous genus Sisyphus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, 9 (19): 456 - 465.","Klug, J. C. F. (1855) Diagnosen neuer Coleoptera aus Mossambique. Bericht uber die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Koniglichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 643 - 660.","Wiedemann, C. K. W. (1823) Zweihundert neue Kafer von Java, Bengalen und dem Vorgebirge der guten Hoffnung. Zoologisches Magazin, 2 (1): 3 - 133.","Peringuey, L. (1901) Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa. Transactions of the South African philosophical Society. Cape Town, 12: 1 - 563 (13 - 368).","Thunberg, C. P. (1818) Coleoptera Capensia, Antennis Lamellatis, sive, clava fissili instructa, descripta, memoires de l'Acad. T. VI.","Paschalidis, K. M. (1974 a) The genus Sisyphus Latr. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Southern Africa. MSc. Thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa, 183 pp.","Gory, M. (1833) Monographie du genre Sisyphe. Mequignon-Marvis pere et fils, Paris. 1 - 15 p.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Boheman, C. H. (1857) Insecta Caffrariae annis 1838 - 1845 a JA Wahlberg collecta. Pars. II. Coleoptera (Scarabaeides). Holmiae: Offieina Nordstedtiana. - 395 pp, 1.","Boucomont, A. (1935) Coleoptera. VI. Scarabaeidae Scarabaeini. In: Jeannel, R. (Ed.), Mission Scientifique de l'Omo. Tome 2 Zoologie, Fascicule 16. Paul Chevalier & Fils, Paris, France, pp. 279 - 290.","Olivier, M. (1789) Entomologie, Histoire Naturelle des Insectes, Avec leurs caracteres generiques et specifiques, leur description, leur synonymie, et leur figure enluminee. Coleopteres, Tome premier, Paris, 1 - 455 pp.","Daniel, G. M., Davis, A. L. V, & Scholtz, C. H. (2016) Three new Sisyphus species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from shaded vegetation in southern Africa. Zootaxa, 4147 (1): 67 - 74.","Montreuil, O. (2015 a) Nouveaux Sisyphus Latreille d'afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 120 (1): 91 - 102.","Harold, E. von (1859) Beitrage zur Kenntniss einiger coprophagen Lamellicornien. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 3 (2 - 3), 193 - 224.","Lansberge, J. W. (1886) Scarabaeides, Buprestides et Cerambycides de l'afrique occidentale. Notes from Leyden Museum, 8 (2): 69 - 120."]}

Neosisyphus macrorubrus (Paschalidis, 1974) (Figs. 29, 30A) Montreuil 2015b: 20, 28 Sisyphus macrorubrus Paschalidis 1974 Paschalidis, 1974b: 300 Size: Males: length: 10.2��� 7.5 mm; width: 4.5���3.0 mm. Females: length: 10.5���7.0 mm; width: 4.5���3.0 mm. Type locality: Vanstandensrus, OFS (Free State, South Africa) Diagnosis: N. macrorubrus is very close in appearance to N. rubrus. However, it shows simple parameres (Fig. 30A) that lack the lateral protrusions, which typify N. rubrus. It also shows a different geographical distribution pattern and minimal overlap with N. rubrus. Examined type material Holotype: (♂ SANC) / SOUTH AFRICA, OFS, Vanstadensrus, 10.xii.1971, leg: Kirk /, /457/1/, /ex coll. CSIRO, Div. Entomology; S. African Station /; red label / Holotype ♂, Sisyphus marcorubrus spec. nov, det. KM Paschalidis, 1974 /, white label /SANC TYPH 00724/ Paratypes: (4♂, 4♀ SANC; 1♂, 1♀ SAM) SOUTH AFRICA, OFS, Ladybrand (Maseru Rd), 27.xi.1971, leg: Bornemissza & Aschenborn. (3♂, 3♀ SANC; 1♂, 1♀ SAM) SOUTH AFRICA, OFS, Zastron (21 mi N), 12.v.1972, leg: Olsen. (2♂, 1♀ SANC; 1♂, 1♀ SAM) SOUTH AFRICA, OFS, Caledon River (3 mi W Maseru), 2.iii.1971, leg: Aschenborn. (9♂, 6♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, CP, Aliwal North (North), 3.iii.1971, leg: Aschenborn. (3♂, 3♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, OFS, Wepener (22 mi N), 11.v.1971, leg: Aschenborn. (4♂, 3♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, CP, Kimberley (25 mi S), 14.iii.1971, leg: Bornemissza & Kirk. (2♂, 1♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, OFS, Rouxville, 01.xi.1971, leg: Bornemissza & Kirk. (1♂, 2♀ SANC) SOUTH AFRICA, OFS, Bloemfontein (11 mi N), 03.xi.1971, leg: Bornemissza & Kirk. (1♂, 3♀ SANC) SW.AFRICA (NAMIBIA), Outjo (15 kms N), 10.iv.1974, leg: Aschenborn. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: N. macrorubrus is distributed in dry savanna, karoo and grassland, un- der cooler conditions in South Africa (Northern Cape and Free State), Namibia (Etosha Pan Okaukuejo) and Botswana (near Kanye) (Fig. 31). Remarks: The type series of S. rubripes Boheman 1857 contained specimens belonging to two different species. P��ringuey (1901) described one of Boheman���s type specimens under the name S. rubripes. However, the characters which P��ringuey discussed did not match those of the holotype of S. rubripes (Arrow 1927), which means that, P��ringuey was describing an unnamed species. The P��ringuey species was recognized as new by Haaf (1955), Ferreira (1972), and later, Paschalidis (1974b) who proposed the current official name for the species., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 54-55, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Paschalidis, K. M. (1974 a) The genus Sisyphus Latr. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Southern Africa. MSc. Thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa, 183 pp.","Montreuil, O. (2015 b) Le genre Neosisyphus Muller em Afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Catharsius La Revue, 12 (1): 1 - 36.","Paschalidis, K. M. (1974 b) The identity of two species in the genus Sisyphus (Coleoptera: Scarbaeidae). Journal of Entomology of Southern Africa. 37 (2): 299 - 303.","Boheman, C. H. (1857) Insecta Caffrariae annis 1838 - 1845 a JA Wahlberg collecta. Pars. II. Coleoptera (Scarabaeides). Holmiae: Offieina Nordstedtiana. - 395 pp, 1.","Peringuey, L. (1901) Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa. Transactions of the South African philosophical Society. Cape Town, 12: 1 - 563 (13 - 368).","Arrow, G. J. (1927) Notes on the Coleopterous genus Sisyphus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, 9 (19): 456 - 465.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088."]}

Neosisyphus tembyi Daniel & Davis sp. n. (Figs. 7, 8C) ZooBank: http://zoobank.org/ 476EBD87-13C2-4DE0-A31E-883EEC69DA66 Diagnosis: N. tembyi sp. n. is similar to Neosisyphus jossoi Montreuil, 2015. Both species are roughly the same size and lack sharp spines on the posterior margin of the metafemur. However, N. tembyi sp. n. bears a small angled protuberance on the midposterior margin of the metafemur in males. The metatrochanter projection in major males of the new species is �� of the total length of the metafemur and is somewhat inwardly projected at the tip. Unlike in N. jossoi, in which the metatrochanter projection is �� of the total length of the metafemur in major males and strongly inwardly projected. Southern African specimens of N. setiger Roth (1851) differ from the new species by bearing a shorter metatrochanter in males, which is �� of the total length of the metafemur. Furthermore, the metatrochanter in Southern African N. setiger projects straight and is never bent on the tip. The phallobase and parameres of all of the above species are distinctly different. Description: Male Holotype: Size. Male: length: 7.3 mm; width: 4.5 mm. Colour. Black body with brown setae; meso- and metasternum black; antennal club brown. Head. Anterior edge of clypeus with shallow sinuosity between medial teeth; lateral extreme of clypeal margin simply arcuate. Clypeo-genal suture markedly cleft; genae elongate. Frons and vertex dorsally granular, setose and minutely punctate, epicranial suture clearly visible. Pronotum. Convex with a sheen on dorsal surface; maximum width as long as the maximum length; setae inserted between ocellate punctures. Incomplete lateral prothoracic ridge between pronotal disc and prothoracic episternum. Elytra. Broad proximally and narrow posteriorly; well-spaced setae on interstriae; elytral surface shiny, distinct antero-lateral humeral callus; striae fine with double marginal lines interrupted by smooth ocellate strial punctures; granulation basally on elytral striae 4���7. Pygidium. Bearing U-shaped, ocellate punctation, a metallic sheen and setation. Sternites. Margins between abdominal sternites setigerous laterally, and glabrous medially with minute ocellate punctation; meso-metasternal suture visible; meso- and metasternum finely punctate and setose; metasternum with a punctate depression on the postero-medial edge. Mesepimeron and metepisternum finely punctate and setose. Legs. In ventral view, profemur carinate antero-laterally, punctate and internally pubescent with a lateral row of fine and well-developed setae; mesofemur finely punctate and setose, lacking any projection posteriorly; metafemur with an angled-protuberance mid-posteriorly with fine punctation and setae; metatrochanter projected backwards almost reaching top of angled protuberance; tip of metatrochanter slightly project- ed inward, but always parallel with metafemur. Metacoxa punctate and shagreened ventro-anteriorly. Protibia with three teeth and single terminal spine; meso-metatibia densely setose, serrated laterally, with two terminal spines on mesotibia, and two terminal spurs on metatibia; pro-, meso- and metatarsus five-segmented, with two claws; mostly setose. Aedeagus. Parameres separated by visible dorsal membranous portion extending nearly to the middle; arciform ridge bordering the membrane laterally, deeply notched medially; inwardly curved on the apex (Fig. 18C). Morphological variation Males bear a backwardly projected metatrochanter that is curved inwardly at the tip; this projection is absent in females where the metatrochanter is contiguous with the metafemur. The pronotum in males is larger than in females. Examined type material Holotype: (1♂ SANC) / Angola, Paiva Coucero (14.816667��S 15.55��E) (50 & 45 km E), 18.xii.1974, leg: Davis & Temby /, / Ex coll CSIRO, Div. Entomology S. African Station /. Paratypes: (1♀ SANC) same data as holotype. Distribution: The species is only known from woodland vegetation in southern Angola (Paiva Coucero) (Fig. 19). Etymology: The patronym is named after Ian Temby, a former researcher at the CSIRO, Division of Entomology, South African station; who was one of the collectors of the type material., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 44-46, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Montreuil, O. (2015 a) Nouveaux Sisyphus Latreille d'afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 120 (1): 91 - 102."]}

Neosisyphus infuscatus (Klug, 1855) (Figs. 20, 21B) Montreuil 2015b: 10; Sisyphus infuscatus Klug, 1855 Klug 1855: 651; Harold 1869: 984; Gillet 1911: 23; Arrow 1927: 464; Haaf 1955: 344; Ferreira 1972: 811. Size: Male: length: 8.1��� 7.1 mm; width: 4.8���3.6. Female: length: 8.0���7.0 mm; width: 4.5���3.0 mm Type locality: Sena, Sofala, Mozambique Diagnosis: N. infuscatus bears a sharp mid-posterior metafemoral spine as opposed to the more obtuse spine in N. spinipes. N. infuscatus also differs by lacking the prominent sharp-angled protrusion on the basal-posterior edge of the mesotibia. Parameres of N. infuscatus are distinctly bent inwards at the apex (Fig. 21B). Examined type material Paralectotype (designated here): (♂ SAM) /Sena/, Sisyphus fortuitus, PJ/, red label / Type SAM, 2677 / spinipes Thunb, det. Haaf 1954/, / Sisyphus infuscatus Klug, det. KM. Paschalidis 1975/, / Paralectotype, det: GM, Daniel, 2016 /. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: N. infuscatus is an East to southern African species, associated with lowland dry savanna (Fig. 22)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on page 49, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Klug, J. C. F. (1855) Diagnosen neuer Coleoptera aus Mossambique. Bericht uber die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Koniglichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 643 - 660.","Montreuil, O. (2015 b) Le genre Neosisyphus Muller em Afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Catharsius La Revue, 12 (1): 1 - 36.","Harold, E. von (1869). Scarabaeidae. Gemminger, M. and Harold, E. Catalogus Coleopterorum. bucusque descriptorum, synonymicus et systematics, autotribus, 4: 976 - 1346. http: // www. iucnredlist. org / static / categories _ criteria _ 3 _ 1 access on 2017.03. 23.","Gillet, J. J. E. (1911) Scarabaeidae: Coprinae I. Coleopterorum Catalogus, 38: 1 - 263.","Arrow, G. J. (1927) Notes on the Coleopterous genus Sisyphus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, 9 (19): 456 - 465.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088.","Daniel, G. M., Davis, A. L. V, & Scholtz, C. H. (2016) Three new Sisyphus species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from shaded vegetation in southern Africa. Zootaxa, 4147 (1): 67 - 74."]}

Neosisyphus kuehni (Haaf, 1955) (Figs. 26, 27B) Montreuil 2015: 28. Sisyphus kuehni Haaf, 1955 Haaf 1955: 345; Montreuil 2015: 28. Type locality: Natal (Griqualand), South Africa. Size: Male: length: 13.5���10; width: 6.5���5.5; Female: length: 13.0���11; width: 6.5���5.6. Diagnosis: N. kuehni bears a gibbosity apically on the metafemur, which is lacking in the closely-related N. quadricollis. The projecting metatrochanter in males of N. kuehni is also longer, comprising over half of the total length of the metafemur. Unlike in N. quadricollis, the elytra in N. kuehni are not laterally emarginate. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: N. kuehni occurs in highland grassland under the moist to wet conditions of the eastern escarpment of South Africa (Eastern Cape, KwaZulu Natal and Mpumalanga) (Fig. 28). Conservation status: N. kuehni was assessed as a Data Deficient species for the IUCN Red Date List (Davis 2013g). Further collecting and monitoring is required to accurately assess the conservation status of this species., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 53-54, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Montreuil, O. (2015 a) Nouveaux Sisyphus Latreille d'afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 120 (1): 91 - 102.","Davis, A. L. V. (2013 g) Neosisyphus kuhni. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e. T 138156 A 537143. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.2305 / IUCN. UK. 20132. RLTS. T 138156 A 537143. en. (accessed 14 October 2016)."]}

Sisyphus umbraphilus Daniel & Davis, 2016 (Figs. 8, 9A) Daniel et al. 2016: 67���69 Size: Male: length: 5.1���7.1 mm, width: 2.9���4.2 mm; Female: length: 5.4���7.4 mm, width 3.2���4.2 mm. Type locality: Umfolozi, KwaZulu Natal (South Africa) Diagnosis: S. umbraphilus belongs to its own species-group. However, it is somewhat similar to S. oralensis. In this case, S. umbraphilus is distinguished by having tufts of epipleural setae. It bears relatively small ocellate punctures on the pronotum. Furthemore, In S. umbraphilus, the parameres are simple and attenuated towards the apex (Fig. 9A) whereas, in S. oralensis they are somewhat obtuse and truncated towards the apex (Fig. 14A). Examined type material Holotype: (♂ SANC): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Umfolozi 28��15���S 31��55���E, 1���7.x. 1970, leg: Bornemissza & Aschenborn. Paratypes: (3♂, 9♀ SANC) with the same data as holotype. (1♂, 2♀ UPSA): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Ithala Game Reserve 27��27���53.6���S 31��15���36.1���E, 13.i.1999, leg: Chown, McGeogh & Davis. (2♂ SANC): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Jozini 27��26���0���S 32��4���0���E, 15.x.1978, leg: Bornemissza & Aschenborn. (7♂, 14♀ SANC): SOUTH AFRICA, Gauteng, Pretoria, 35 km NE of Pretoria Farm 25��42���0���S 28��13���0���E, 12���13.xii.1983, leg: Davis. (1♂ SANC): SOUTH AFRICA, KZN, Weke-Weke Stream, Shongweni Farm 29��48���S 30��43���E, 11.xi.2010, leg: AJ Armstrong & G Van Bassouw. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: S. umbraphilus has been recorded in patches of dense woodland and thicket in KwaZulu Natal (Daniel et al. 2016) as well as in dense riverine woodland in North West Province (South Africa). In Gauteng, it has been collected from shaded vegetation on deep sands (Davis 1996) (Fig. 10)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on pages 26-27, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Daniel, G. M., Davis, A. L. V, & Scholtz, C. H. (2016) Three new Sisyphus species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) from shaded vegetation in southern Africa. Zootaxa, 4147 (1): 67 - 74.","Davis, A. L. V. (1996) Habitat associations in a South African, summer rainfall, dung beetle community (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Aphodiidae, Staphylinidae, Histeridae, Hydrophilidae). Pedobiologia, 40 (3): 260 - 280."]}

Neosisyphus M��ller, 1942 M��ller 1942: 86; Haaf 1955: 346; Ferreira 1972: 810���844; Schaefer & Fisher 1992: 130; Montreuil 2015b: 1���44 Type species: Neosisyphus spinipes (Thunberg, 1818), Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on page 42, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Muller, G. (1942) Nuovi coleotteri dell'Africa Orientale (2 a serie) Atti del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Trieste, 15 (3): 63 - 86.","Haaf, E. (1955) Uber die Gattung Sisyphus Latr. (Col. Scarab.). Entomologische Arbeitenaus dem Museum G. Frey, 6 (1): 341 - 381.","Ferreira, M. C. (1972) Os Escarabideos de Africa (sul do Saara). Revista de Entomologia de Mocambique, 11 (1968 - 1969): 5 - 1088.","Schafer, P., & Fischer, E. (1992) Zur Scarabaeiden-Fauna Rwandas, Zentralafrika. Sisyphini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Lamellicornia). Senckenbergiana biologica, 72 (1 - 3), 119 - 137.","Montreuil, O. (2015 b) Le genre Neosisyphus Muller em Afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Catharsius La Revue, 12 (1): 1 - 36.","Thunberg, C. P. (1818) Coleoptera Capensia, Antennis Lamellatis, sive, clava fissili instructa, descripta, memoires de l'Acad. T. VI."]}

seminulum species-group (Figs. 14 A���D, 15A���C). Sisyphus splendidus Montreuil 2015 (Fig. 14A). Montreuil 2015a: 91���102 Type locality: Otavi mts, Farm Gauss (Namibia) Size: Female: length: 4.5 mm, width: 2.5 mm. Diagnosis: S. splendidus may be separated from other members of the seminulum species-group by the distinct metallic sheen on the pronotal disc. Examined non-type material: See Supplementary information. Distribution: Sisyphus splendidus is found in unshaded vegetation of northern Namibia and southern Angola (Fig. 16)., Published as part of Daniel, Gimo M., Davis, Adrian Lv., Sole, Catherine L. & Scholtz, Clarke H., 2020, Taxonomic review of the tribe Sisyphini sensu stricto Mulsant, 1842 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in southern Africa, including new species descriptions, pp. 1-61 in Insect Systematics & Evolution 51 (1) on page 37, DOI: 10.1163/1876312X-00002195, http://zenodo.org/record/3786629, {"references":["Montreuil, O. (2015 a) Nouveaux Sisyphus Latreille d'afrique (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sisyphini). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 120 (1): 91 - 102."]}