1. Towards standards for human fecal sample processing in metagenomic studies
- Author
-
Rajna Hercog, Paul W. O'Toole, Melanie Tramontano, Thomas Carton, Michael Blaut, Muriel Derrien, John Penders, Ruth Ann Luna, Karen P. Scott, Milena Popova, Jillian R.M. Brown, Volker Mai, Francisco Guarner, Adriana Alberti, Nicolas Pons, Anne Druesne, Kiran Raosaheb Patil, Bhagirath Singh, Delphine M. Saulnier, Kathleen Slezak, Georg Zeller, Joël Doré, Clémentine Mery, Jennifer C. Martin, Jana Junick, Masahira Hattori, Harry J. Flint, Eric Pelletier, Florence Levenez, Liping Zhao, James Versalovic, Ingeborg Klymiuk, Jens Roat Kultima, Matthew R. Hayward, Shinichi Sunagawa, Søren Persson, Hans G.H.J. Heilig, Ferris Elias Jung, S. Dusko Ehrlich, Patrick Veiga, Anne Salonen, Stéphanie Cools-Portier, Chaysavanh Manichanh, Laurie Bertrand, Willem M. de Vos, Luis Pedro Coelho, B. Brett Finlay, Michelle C. Daigneault, Paul I. Costea, Céline Orvain, Philippe Langella, Johan E. T. van Hylckama Vlieg, Marja Driessen, Erwin G. Zoetendal, Emma Allen-Vercoe, Peer Bork, Hidetoshi Morita, Institut de Biologie François JACOB (JACOB), Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Génomique métabolique (UMR 8030), Genoscope - Centre national de séquençage [Evry] (GENOSCOPE), Université Paris-Saclay-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne (UEVE)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), MetaGenoPolis, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), European Community's Seventh Framework Programme via International Human Microbiome Standards [HEALTH-F4-2010-261376], Scottish Government Rural and Environmental Science and Analytical Services, EMBL, European Project: 261376,EC:FP7:HEALTH,FP7-HEALTH-2010-single-stage,IHMS(2011), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne (UEVE), MetaGénoPolis, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne (UEVE)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Med Microbiol, Infect Dis & Infect Prev, RS: CAPHRI - R4 - Health Inequities and Societal Participation, RS: NUTRIM - R2 - Liver and digestive health, and RS: NUTRIM - R2 - Gut-liver homeostasis
- Subjects
Quality Control ,0301 basic medicine ,[SDV.BIO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biotechnology ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Sample (material) ,030106 microbiology ,Sample processing ,Biomedical Engineering ,bacterial-dna ,Bioengineering ,Chemical Fractionation ,Biology ,Microbiology ,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology ,diversity ,dna-extraction methods ,Feces ,03 medical and health sciences ,Human gut ,Species Specificity ,Microbiologie ,human gut microbiota ,Biological variation ,Humans ,Life Science ,Microbiome ,VLAG ,disease ,Bacteria ,business.industry ,Computational Biology ,DNA ,DNA extraction ,Biotechnology ,030104 developmental biology ,Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases ,Metagenomics ,Molecular Medicine ,business - Abstract
International audience; Technical variation in metagenomic analysis must be minimized to confidently assess the contributions of microbiota to human health. Here we tested 21 representative DNA extraction protocols on the same fecal samples and quantified differences in observed microbial community composition. We compared them with differences due to library preparation and sample storage, which we contrasted with observed biological variation within the same specimen or within an individual over time. We found that DNA extraction had the largest effect on the outcome of metagenomic analysis. To rank DNA extraction protocols, we considered resulting DNA quantity and quality, and we ascertained biases in estimates of community diversity and the ratio between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. We recommend a standardized DNA extraction method for human fecal samples, for which transferability across labs was established and which was further benchmarked using a mock community of known composition. Its adoption will improve comparability of human gut microbiome studies and facilitate meta-analyses.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF