1. Postspinal Headache in Taylor's Approach: A Comparison between 21- and 25-Gauge Needles in Orthopaedic Patients
- Author
-
F. S. Rucci, Doni L, R. Barbagli, P. Pippa, and M. Rabassini
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Postspinal headache ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Anesthesia, Spinal ,Spinal Puncture ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Humans ,Medicine ,In patient ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Midline approach ,business.industry ,Headache ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Middle Aged ,Surgery ,Orthopedics ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Mild symptoms ,Needles ,Anesthesia ,Orthopedic surgery ,Subarachnoid space ,business ,Lumbosacral joint - Abstract
A randomized study was carried out on 160 patients aged 30โ60 years with the aim of finding a method of preventing postdural puncture headache (PDPH). In Taylor's lumbosacral approach to the subarachnoid space, two different needle sizes were used (21-gauge versus 25-gauge) for injecting the anaesthetic solution. Our results show an overall incidence of PDPH in nearly 8% of patients, with no significant difference related to the size of the needle employed. Patients with PDPH showed mild symptoms which disappeared in a short time and none needed epidural blood patching. The possibility of using larger needles, facilitating the execution of the block without increasing PDPH incidence, renders this technique particularly attractive in patients where the midline approach is not feasible, or when pencil-point needles are not available.
- Published
- 1995
- Full Text
- View/download PDF