1. Thrombolysis after dabigatran reversal: A nation-wide Italian multicentre study, systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Michele Romoli, Eleonora Matteo, Ludovica Migliaccio, Mauro Gentile, Maria Giulia Mosconi, Giuseppe Maria Scura, Marcello Naccarato, Enrico Colangeli, Paolo Candelaresi, Vincenzo Andreone, Fabrizio Giammello, Rosa Fortunata Musolino, Cristina Dell’Aera, Federica Nicoletta Sepe, Edoardo Pronello, Leonardo Barbarini, Marcella Caggiula, Federica Rizzo, Marco Petruzzellis, Elisa Giorli, Maria Luisa Zedde, Sabrina Anticoli, Marilena Mangiardi, Mario Muto, Francesco Diana, Maria Vittoria De Angelis, Anna Digiovanni, Letizia Concari, Sara La Gioia, Maria Sessa, Sara Biguzzi, Francesco Cordici, Marco Longoni, Maria Ruggiero, Silvia Cenciarelli, Paolo Eusebi, Simona Sacco, Valeria Caso, Maurizio Paciaroni, Stefano Ricci, Andrea Zini, Danilo Toni, and David Giannandrea
- Subjects
Stroke ,thrombolysis ,thrombectomy ,Original Research Articles ,Neurology (clinical) ,antidote ,direct oral anticoagulants ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine - Abstract
Introduction: Recent anticoagulant intake represents a contraindication for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, potentially allowing for thrombolysis. This nation-wide observational cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis preceded by dabigatran-reversal in people with acute ischemic stroke. Patients and methods: We recruited people undergoing thrombolysis following dabigatran-reversal at 17 stroke centers in Italy (reversal-group), people on dabigatran treated with thrombolysis without reversal (no-reversal group), and age, sex, hypertension, stroke severity, and reperfusion treatment-matched controls in 1:7 ratio (control-group). We compared groups for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, main outcome), any brain hemorrhage, good functional outcome (mRS 0–2 at 3 months), and death. The systematic review followed a predefined protocol (CRD42017060274), and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis was implemented to compare groups. Results: Thirty-nine patients in dabigatran-reversal group and 300 matched controls were included. Reversal was associated with a non-significant increase in sICH (10.3% vs 6%, aOR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.39–4.52), death (17.9% vs 10%, aOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.12–4.93) and good functional outcome (64.1% vs 52.8%, aOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.63–3.19). No hemorrhagic events or deaths were registered in no-reversal group (n = 12). Pooling data from 3 studies after systematic review (n = 1879), reversal carried a non-significant trend for sICH (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.67–3.50), death (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.73–3.24) and good functional outcome (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 0.85–7.16). Discussion and conclusion: People treated with reperfusion strategies after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seem to have a marginal increase in the risk of sICH but comparable functional recovery to matched patients with stroke. Further studies are needed to define treatment cost-effectiveness and potential thresholds in plasma dabigatran concentration for reversal.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF