1. Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones
- Author
-
Misako Tsubouchi, Kouhei Tsuchida, Mari Iwasaki, Tsunehiro Suzuki, Naoto Yoshitake, Hideyuki Hiraishi, Chieko Tsuchida, and Takako Sasai
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Lithotripsy ,Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic ,Postoperative Complications ,Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation ,Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Common bile duct stone ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ,Common bile duct ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Bile duct ,business.industry ,Gastroenterology ,food and beverages ,General Medicine ,Hepatology ,medicine.disease ,Combined Modality Therapy ,Dilatation ,Surgery ,Choledocholithiasis ,Treatment Outcome ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Balloon dilation ,Pancreatitis ,Female ,Complication ,business ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (≥3) or large (≥15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (≥3) or large (≥15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques. Methods Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, ≥15 mm) or ≥ 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups. Results The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF