1. Susceptibility to peer influence in adolescents with mild-to-borderline intellectual disability: Investigating links with inhibition, Theory of Mind and negative interpretation bias
- Author
-
Wagemaker, E., Dekkers, T.J., Bexkens, A., Salemink, E., Zadelaar, J.N., Huizenga, H.M., Experimental psychopathology, Leerstoel Engelhard, Experimental psychopathology, Leerstoel Engelhard, Methods and Statistics (RICDE, FMG), Ontwikkelingspsychologie (Psychologie, FMG), and Psychology Other Research (FMG)
- Subjects
peer influence ,IDENTIFICATION ,negative interpretation bias ,SOCIAL-ANXIETY ,PSYCHOPATHOLOGY ,Theory of Mind ,CHILDREN ,BEHAVIOR RATING INVENTORY ,RISK-TAKING ,inhibition ,Adolescence ,Education ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,PEOPLE ,intellectual disability ,STRENGTHS ,DIFFICULTIES QUESTIONNAIRE SDQ ,Psychology(all) ,METAANALYSIS ,General Psychology - Abstract
Background: Adolescents with mild-to-borderline intellectual disability (MBID) may be more susceptible to peer influence than typically developing (TD) adolescents.Aims: This preregistered study compares adolescents with MBID and TD adolescents on their susceptibility to peer influence and investigates links with three potential underlying mechanisms: inhibition, Theory of Mind (ToM) and negative interpretation bias.Methods and Procedures: We assessed 163 adolescents (111 MBID, 52 TD; 14-19 years; 63% boys) using experimental tasks and self- and/or teacher-reports.Outcomes and Results: Adolescents with MBID and TD adolescents did not differ in their susceptibility to peer influence, inhibition and negative interpretations. On two of the four ToM instruments, adolescents with MBID showed weaker ToM than TD adolescents. In a structural equation model, tested in the MBID group, the latent factors inhibition, ToM and negative interpretation bias were not related to susceptibility to peer influence.Conclusions and Implications: Using a multimethod approach, a structural equation model, and a large sample, this study revealed new insights in adolescents with MBID: they did not differ from TD adolescents in many domains and their inhibition, ToM and negative interpretation bias were not linked to their susceptibility to peer influence.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF