Search

In November 2006, a panel of experts participated in a teleconference to discuss the issue of adherence to antihypertensive therapy. The panel was chaired by JoAnne M. Foody, MD, of the Yale University School of Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, New Haven, CT. Also participating were Joshua S. Benner, PharmD, ScD, ValueMedics Research, Falls Church, VA, and William Frishman, MD, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY.

BackgroundThere has been a paradigm shift in the definition of timing of early invasive strategy (EIS) for patients admitted with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in the last decade. Data on trends of EIS for NSTEMI and associated in-hospital outcomes are limited. Our aim is to analyze temporal trends in the incidence, utilization of early invasive strategy, and in-hospital outcomes of NSTEMI in the United States.Methods and resultsWe analyzed the 2002-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases to identify all patients ≥40 years of age with the principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and NSTEMI. Logistic regression was used for overall, age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-stratified trend analysis. From 2002 to 2011, we identified 6 512 372 patients with AMI. Of these, 3 981 119 (61.1%) had NSTEMI. The proportion of patients with NSTEMI increased from 52.8% in 2002 to 68.6% in 2011 (adjusted odds ratio [OR; per year], 1.055; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.054 to 1.056) in the overall cohort. Similar trends were observed in age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-stratified groups. From 2002 to 2011, utilization of EIS at day 0 increased from 14.9% to 21.8% (Ptrend