1. Diagnosis of 'cribriform' prostatic adenocarcinoma: an interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists with recommendations
- Author
-
Shah, Rajal B., Qi Cai, Manju Aron, Berney, Daniel M., Cheville, John C., Fang-Ming Deng, Jonathan Epstein, Fine, Samson W., Genega, Elizabeth M., Hirsch, Michelle S., Humphrey, Peter A., Jennifer Gordetsky, Glen Kristiansen, Kunju, Lakshmi P., Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Nilesh Gupta, George Netto, Osunkoya, Adeboye O., Robinson, Brian D., Kiril Trpkov, True, Lawrence D., Patricia Troncoso, Murali Varma, Thomas Wheeler, Williamson, Sean R., Angela Wu, and Ming Zhou
- Subjects
Original Article - Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of cribriform Gleason pattern 4 (CrP4) prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) is important due to its independent association with adverse clinical outcomes and as a growing body of evidence suggests that it impacts clinical decision making in PCa management. To identify reproducible features for diagnosis of CrP4, we assessed interobserver agreement among 27 experienced urologic pathologists of 60 digital images from 44 radical prostatectomies (RP) that represented a broad spectrum of potential CrP4. The following morphologic features were correlated with the consensus diagnosis (defined as 75% agreement) for each image: partial vs. transluminal glandular bridging, intraglandular stroma, 50% of luminal space) vs. loose, and regular vs. irregular contour. Interobserver reproducibility for the overall diagnostic agreement was fair (k=0.40). Large CrP4 had better agreement (k=0.49) compared to small CrP4 (k=0.40). Transluminal bridging, dense cellular proliferation, a clear luminal space along the periphery of gland occupying 50% of the glandular circumference were associated with consensus against CrP4. In summary, we identified reproducible morphological features for and against CrP4 diagnosis, which could be used to refine and standardize the diagnostic criteria for CrP4.
- Published
- 2021