1. Time-Opening Suprapubic Catheter versus Intermittent Catheter for Male Patients with Spinal Cord Injury (Spinal Level above Level C5)
- Author
-
JB Huang, Tianhai Huang, Keji Xie, Hui Chen, Qiuling Liu, J. W. Zeng, Ping Tang, Rubiao Ou, Chonghe Jiang, Maping Huang, and Qingqing Li
- Subjects
030506 rehabilitation ,Creatinine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Urethral stricture ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Urinary system ,Renal function ,urologic and male genital diseases ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Catheter ,0302 clinical medicine ,chemistry ,medicine ,Bladder stones ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Spinal cord injury ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Objective: To compare the short-time complications associated with time-opening suprapubic catheter (SPT) versus intermittent catheter (IC) in male patients with spinal cord injury (above level C5). Methods: A prospective review of records was carried out to identify SCI patients managed with SPT or IC between 2011 and 2016. The complications included renal function (Serum creatinine), urinary tract infection (UTI), bladder stones, urethral complications, scrotal, and gross hematuria. Patients were followed at week 4, 3 and 6 months; the urodynamic assessment was repeated at 6 months. Results: A total of 30 patients (11 SPT, 19 IC) were recruited in this trial. There is no significant difference between the two catheter groups for the entire out-come. Scrotal abscesses and urethral stricture were only seen in patients with IC. Conclusions: SPT has similar urological complication with IC for SCI patients (above level C5) except the incidence of scrotal abscesses and urethral stricture.
- Published
- 2016