Search

The Radiology Research Alliance (RRA) of the Association of University Radiologists (AUR) convenes Task Forces to address current topics in radiology. In this article, the AUR-RRA Task Force on Academic-Industry Partnerships for Artificial Intelligence, considered issues of importance to academic radiology departments contemplating industry partnerships in artificial intelligence (AI) development, testing and evaluation. Our goal was to create a framework encompassing the domains of clinical, technical, regulatory, legal and financial considerations that impact the arrangement and success of such partnerships.

Objective The Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 requires clinicians to consult Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) when ordering advanced imaging procedures. Free-text order indications are available when there is no applicable structured indication but are unscored by the AUC. We determined the proportion of free-text indications among all advanced imaging orders and the proportion of free-text indications that could be mapped to a single structured indication. Methods All outpatient advanced diagnostic imaging orders placed in a large multisite health system were recorded after initial AUC deployment (November 20, 2017, to December 19, 2017). Clinicians were prompted upon order entry to select a structured indication or enter a free-text indication. We manually reviewed the two imaging examinations with the highest rate of free-text indications: enhanced CT abdomen/pelvis and unenhanced CT head. Regression analysis examined differences in patient-, imaging-, context-, and provider-level characteristics between scored and unscored examinations. Results Among all 39,533 orders for advanced imaging procedures, 59% (23,267 of 39,533) were unscored by the system. The regression model c-statistic (0.50-0.55) demonstrated poor model fit to evaluate for differences between scored and unscored examinations. Free-text indications were found in 71% (16,440 of 23,267) of unscored examinations and 42% (16,440 of 39,533) of all examinations. Manual review of all 1,693 CT abdomen/pelvis and 1,527 CT head examinations with free-text indications revealed that 3,132 free-text indications (97%) could be mapped to a single existing structured indication. Discussion Of all initially placed outpatient advanced imaging procedure orders, 42% included free-text indications and 97% of manually reviewed free-text indications could be mapped to a single structured indication.

Purpose To determine whether inclusion of an epidemiologic statement in radiology reports of lumbar magnetic resonance (MR) imaging influences downstream health care utilization in the primary care population. Materials and Methods Beginning July 1, 2013, a validated epidemiologic statement regarding prevalence of common findings in asymptomatic patients was included in all lumbar MR imaging reports at a tertiary academic medical center. Data were collected from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2014, and retrospective analysis was completed in September 2016. The electronic medical record was reviewed to capture health care utilization rates in patients for 1 year after index MR imaging. Of 4527 eligible adult patients with low back pain referred for lumbar spine MR imaging during the study period, 375 patients had their studies ordered by in-network primary care providers, did not have findings other than degenerative disease, and had at least one follow-up encounter within the system within 1 year of index MR imaging. In the before-and-after study design, a pre-statement-implementation cohort was compared with a post-statement-implementation cohort by using univariate and multivariate statistical models to evaluate treatment utilization rates in these groups. Results Patients in the statement group were 12% less likely to be referred to a spine specialist (137 of 187 [73%] vs 159 of 188 [85%]; P = .007) and were 7% less likely to undergo repeat imaging (seven of 187 [4%] vs 20 of 188 [11%]; P = .01) compared with patients in the nonstatement group. The intervention was not associated with any change in narcotic prescription (53 of 188 [28%] vs 54 of 187 [29%]; P = .88) or with the rate of low back surgery (24 of 188 [13%] vs 16 of 187 [9%]; P = .19). Conclusion In this study, inclusion of a simple epidemiologic statement in lumbar MR imaging reports was associated with decreased utilization in high-cost domains of low back pain management. © RSNA, 2018.

To evaluate clinical outcomes following percutaneous rupture of symptomatic lumbar facet synovial cysts (LFSCs) with intra-articular steroid injection.In this retrospective review, 44 consecutive patients with symptomatic LFSCs received primary treatment with CT-guided synovial cyst rupture with intra-articular steroid injection. Outcomes questionnaires were obtained before and 1, 4, 26, and 52 weeks after LFSC rupture. Assessment included pain medication use and numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 12-item short form health survey (SF-12) physical and mental composite scores (PCS and MCS). Clinical endpoint was 52-week survey response or surgery.LFSC rupture was technically successful in 84% (37/44) of cases. Clinical endpoint was reached in 68% (30/44) of patients with 82% overall 1-year follow-up. Lumbar spine surgery was performed in 25% (11/44) of patients within 1 year after procedure. Mean NRS, ODI, and SF-12 PCS demonstrated significant improvement at all follow-up time points (P.001). At 52-week follow-up, NRS decreased from 8.1 to 3.7 (P.001), ODI improved from 35 to 24 (P = .006), and SF-12 PCS improved from 31 to 42 (P.001). Daily pain medication decreased from 71% (31/44) of patients before procedure to 29% (9/26) at 52-week follow-up (P = .012). History of prior lumbar intervention was associated with poorer LFSC rupture success (P = .025) and ODI (P = .047).NRS, ODI, and SF-12 PCS indices improved and pain medication use decreased significantly at all time points over 1-year follow-up after percutaneous rupture of symptomatic LFSCs with intra-articular steroid injection.

Rationale and ObjectivesIn flipped learning, medical students independently learn facts and concepts outside the classroom, and then participate in interactive classes to learn to apply these facts. Although there are recent calls for medical education reform using flipped learning, little has been published on its effectiveness. Our study compares the effects of flipped learning to traditional didactic instruction on students' academic achievement, task value, and achievement emotions.Materials and MethodsAt three institutions, we alternated flipped learning with traditional didactic lectures during radiology clerkships, with 175 medical students completing a pretest on general diagnostic imaging knowledge to assess baseline cohort comparability. Following instruction, posttests and survey examinations of task value and achievement emotions were administered. Linear mixed effects analysis was used to examine the relationship between test scores and instruction type. Survey responses were modeled using ordinal category logistic regression. Instructor surveys were also collected.ResultsThere were no baseline differences in test scores. Mean posttest minus pretest scores were 10.5% higher in the flipped learning group than in the didactic instruction group (P = 0.013). Assessment of task value and achievement emotions showed greater task value, increased enjoyment, and decreased boredom with flipped learning (all P

Renal imaging has become a fundamental part of clinical care for patients with kidney disease. Imaging strategies for the kidney have been evolving during the past hundred years and have been even more rapidly changing during the past couple of decades due to the development of modern computed tomographic techniques, magnetic resonance imaging, and more sophisticated ultrasonographic techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Applying the correct radiologic study for the clinical situation maximizes the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging, and a judicious choice between techniques helps limit radiation dose and potential adverse events. This Core Curriculum outlines the imaging modalities currently in use in radiology departments and is divided into 3 sections: (1) a review of the development of renal imaging and an outline of modalities available to the nephrologist, (2) imaging strategies for select clinical situations, and (3) a discussion of some potential adverse events from imaging, including effects of iodinated contrast on kidney function, risks of gadolinium-based contrast agents in kidney failure, and potential risks of imaging techniques that use ionizing radiation.

e18307 Background: Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) and symptomatic brain metastases (mets) are potential emergencies that demand coordinated multidisciplinary management. Patients (pts) with concerning symptoms are often referred to the Emergency Department (ED) for expedited imaging, but most do not require subsequent ED or inpatient management. Unnecessary ED visits incur substantial cost to the health system and patients, and cause psychosocial stress for patients often near the end-of-life. To improve access to expedited outpatient imaging for high-risk pts and reduce unnecessary ED visits, we developed outpatient rapid MRI protocols and pathways to rule out MSCC and brain mets. Methods: Tailored abbreviated MRI protocols were developed to allow rapid acquisition of brain ( < 13 minutes) and full spine ( < 25 minutes) exams. Dedicated appointments were reserved on the daily MRI schedule. Exams were immediately interpreted and reported by Radiology to the ordering clinician. This pathway was piloted within the Thoracic Oncology group beginning in 10/2018. Results: Referring specialties included Radiation Oncology (50%), Medical Oncology (36%), Pulmonology (7%), and Surgery (7%). For 6 pts who had outpatient rapid brain imaging, median time from order to exam start was 4.3 h (1.8-31) and order to final report 6.8 h (3.2-34.1). Brain mets were found in 4/6 patients. Only 1/4 positive studies required subsequent ED management. For 8 pts referred for rapid spine imaging, median time from order to exam start was 14.4 h (2.2-72.5) and order to final report 16.7 h (4.0-74.4). Only 1 patient was found to have cord compression and required ED/inpatient management. Overall, 86% of patients did not require ED or inpatient admission. 3 pts (all with negative imaging) died a median 13.4 d (1.4-28.3) after order placement. Conclusions: Outpatient rapid MRI protocols facilitate same-day imaging, interpretation, and management, improving care for thoracic oncology pts with new concerning neurologic symptoms and reducing unnecessary ED visits. Future work will expand access beyond Thoracic Oncology and further quantify improvements in cost savings and patient quality of life.