Search

Objective The provision of medicines through state public hospitals is comparatively restrictive compared with the federally funded Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Individual states are progressively moving towards statewide medicines formularies. Although a statewide formulary has existed in Queensland for some time. The effects of hospital formularies on medicines utilisation and policy in Australia has not been quantified. Thus, the aim of the present study was to quantify the effects of the Queensland Health List of Approved Medicines (LAM) on medicines utilisation in Queensland at a state and PBS-purchasing level and describe the implications for medicines policy. Methods This study used a quasi-experimental design with an interrupted time series (with control for PBS) examining utilisation effects of medicines within the therapeutic classes of proton pump inhibitors and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants with LAM listing or delisting. Results The LAM was demonstrated to be highly effective at controlling utilisation within Queensland Health purchasing. Effects on PBS utilisation were evident, resulting in increases in generic utilisation (where available) and associated reduced total costs both within Queensland Health and to the PBS. The full benefit is likely underestimated due to limitations in the PBS datasets. Conclusion The LAM is a highly effective state medicines policy tool with demonstrable effects on PBS utilisation. With increased use of statewide medicines formularies, this will be an increasingly relevant aspect of Australia’s overall medicines policy. What is known about the topic? State medicines policy is comparatively restrictive compared with the federal PBS. Most Australian states have, or are developing, statewide medicines formularies. What does this paper add? By examining several classes of medicines, a substantial quantitative effect of the Queensland state formulary on both state and PBS medicines utilisation can be demonstrated. Increased use of generic medicines and reduced costs are seen. What are the implications for practitioners? With increased use of state medicines formularies, state medicines formularies will become increasingly relevant to medicines policy makers and advocates at both the state and federal level.

Background and Purpose: Conditions associated with frailty are common in people experiencing stroke and may explain differences in outcomes. We assessed associations between a published, generic frailty risk score, derived from administrative data, and patient outcomes following stroke/transient ischemic attack; and its accuracy for stroke in predicting mortality compared with other measures of clinical status using coded data. Methods: Patient-level data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (2009–2013) were linked with hospital admissions data. We used International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes with a 5-year look-back period to calculate the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (termed Frailty Score hereafter) and summarized results into 4 groups: no-risk (0), low-risk (1–5), intermediate-risk (5–15), and high-risk (>15). Multilevel models, accounting for hospital clustering, were used to assess associations between the Frailty Score and outcomes, including mortality (Cox regression) and readmissions up to 90 days, prolonged acute length of stay (>20 days; logistic regression), and health-related quality of life at 90 to 180 days (quantile regression). The performance of the Frailty Score was then compared with the Charlson and Elixhauser Indices using multiple tests (eg, C statistics) for predicting 30-day mortality. Models were adjusted for covariates including sociodemographics and stroke-related factors. Results: Among 15 468 adult patients, 15% died ≤90 days. The frailty scores were 9% no risk; 23% low, 45% intermediate, and 22% high. A 1-point increase in frailty (continuous variable) was associated with greater length of stay (OR adjusted , 1.05 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.06), 90-day mortality (HR adjusted , 1.04 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.05]), readmissions (OR adjusted , 1.02 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.03]; and worse health-related quality of life (median difference, −0.010 [95% CI −0.012 to −0.010]). Adjusting for the Frailty Score provided a slightly better explanation of 30-day mortality (eg, larger C statistics) compared with other indices. Conclusions: Greater frailty was associated with worse outcomes following stroke/transient ischemic attack. The Frailty Score provides equivalent precision compared with the Charlson and Elixhauser indices for assessing risk-adjusted outcomes following stroke/transient ischemic attack.

Background Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is used for many off-label indications without high quality evidence to support its efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine indications for use of off-label rFVIIa, efficacy and safety, and adherence to institutional guidelines. Methods We performed a retrospective review of off-label rFVIIa at two tertiary hospitals from 2007 to 2010. Results One hundred forty-five administrations were identified and analysed. Haemorrhage associated with cardiac surgery made up one-third of all rFVIIa usage, with trauma (20%) and other surgery (11%) the next most frequent indications. Compared with all others, cardiac surgery patients were older (60.0 years versus 47.4 years, P < 0.001) and had lower pre-rFVIIa transfusion requirements, a higher subjective response rate (88% versus 46%, P < 0.001) and lower mortality rates (6.1% versus 33%, P < 0.001), but higher rates of arterial thrombormbolic events (16.7% versus 2.1%, P = 0.002). Most patients received only one or two doses (n = 137; 95%), with no subject receiving a third or subsequent dose having an appreciable reduction in bleeding. Only a small number of patients (n = 15; 10.3%) had rFVIIa administered in accordance with our institutions' guidelines. Conclusion Patients administered rFVIIa for haemorrhage not associated with cardiac surgery were severely unwell. Despite lack of evidence, administration of rFVIIa may be justified by the high mortality rate, but more than two doses are unlikely to provide further benefit. The high rate of arterial thromboembolism in cardiac surgical patients raises riskbenefit considerations. Adherence to our institutions' guidelines was poor.

Objective: Recent changes to therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of gentamicin have been advocated in Australia. It remains uncertain whether these will have an effect on hard clinical endpoints. The aim of this study was to determine clinical outcomes in patients with gram-negative infections treated with gentamicin. Methods: Microbiology results of patients with confirmed gram-negative cultures were retrospectively reviewed and those treated with gentamicin included. Medical records were reviewed and patient demographics, diagnosis, renal function, comorbidities, gentamicin doses, duration, monitoring, concomitant antibiotics, antimicrobial sensitivity and clinical and microbiological outcomes recorded. Results: A total of 100 patients were included in the study: 52% were male, median age 64 years (17–97). Total body weight was recorded in 56% (median 74.5 kg, range 35–134 kg). Most patients had two or more important comorbidities. A total of 72% received empiric and 28% directed treatment. The organism was identified on blood culture in 45%, urine culture in 43% and aspiration of liver abscess in 12%; 95% of organisms were sensitive to gentamicin. Baseline renal function was normal in 62%. Mean gentamicin dose was 3.9 ± 0.9 mg/kg and mean duration 2.9 ± 2.5 days. Only 21% had optimal TDM. Clinical outcome was favourable in 90%. There were no cases of preventable serious toxicity. Conclusions: Despite the modest doses of gentamicin used in an elderly population with comorbidities, as well as the absence of optimal TDM, outcomes were favourable without preventable serious toxicity.

Codeine is a weak opioid analgesic. It has to be converted to morphine, but there is significant inter-individual...

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is used for many off-label indications without high quality evidence to support its efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine indications for use of off-label rFVIIa, efficacy and safety, and adherence to institutional guidelines.We performed a retrospective review of off-label rFVIIa at two tertiary hospitals from 2007 to 2010.One hundred forty-five administrations were identified and analysed. Haemorrhage associated with cardiac surgery made up one-third of all rFVIIa usage, with trauma (20%) and other surgery (11%) the next most frequent indications. Compared with all others, cardiac surgery patients were older (60.0 years versus 47.4 years, P0.001) and had lower pre-rFVIIa transfusion requirements, a higher subjective response rate (88% versus 46%, P0.001) and lower mortality rates (6.1% versus 33%, P0.001), but higher rates of arterial thrombormbolic events (16.7% versus 2.1%, P = 0.002). Most patients received only one or two doses (n = 137; 95%), with no subject receiving a third or subsequent dose having an appreciable reduction in bleeding. Only a small number of patients (n = 15; 10.3%) had rFVIIa administered in accordance with our institutions' guidelines.Patients administered rFVIIa for haemorrhage not associated with cardiac surgery were severely unwell. Despite lack of evidence, administration of rFVIIa may be justified by the high mortality rate, but more than two doses are unlikely to provide further benefit. The high rate of arterial thromboembolism in cardiac surgical patients raises risk-benefit considerations. Adherence to our institutions' guidelines was poor.

The interaction between voriconazole and simvastatin is not adequately described in commonly available references.

There are reports of adverse drug events associated with dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor approved for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.