Search

Lawsuits related to defects in apartment buildings involve a range of legal issues, based on which the current subjective judgment system has been established. This study aims to organize the judgment system by stage of lawsuit from a legal perspective by reviewing the factors dealt with in precedent research. The main issues at hand include assignment of obligation, the day on which the computation of exclusion period begins and the day on which the defect repair is completed. The rationality of the current subjective judgment system could be determined by reviewing the recent cases. Based on the findings of the review, the following are suggestions for improvements and complements of the system. First, the process of assignment of obligation should be systemized, and the guarantee insurance system that provides a warranty deed should be improved as well. In addition, improvements and systemization should be made to clarify the responsibilities for any defect arising from the agreements that are not stipulated on the contract, computation of abatement rate of compensation and the system by which the responsibility for the defects is completed when residents acquire ownership from rental status.

Under the law of Management of Apartment Complexes, the Apartment Supplier should satisfy the demands of residents for the repair of defects found in Apartment Housing. But in the cost of defect repair, the expense of resident complaints is not included, and only the actual defect repair expense is counted. So in this study, the actual use state of defect deposits for 3 years after moving in is analyzed based on the actual use data of 39 apartment complexes. The study shows that more than 50% of defect repair deposits are spent to satisfy expenses arising from complaints by residents. This is not only caused by irrational demands of residents, but also by the adoption of a stopgap policy by Apartment Suppliers.

본 논문에서는 OECD 국가별 패널자료를 이용하여 지니계수 등으로 측정되는 소득불평등 정도가 소비·투자·수출의 부문별 총수요에 미치는 영향을 실증 분석하였다. 특히 상위 10%의 소득 비중을 대안적인 불평등 지표로서 설명변수에 추가하여, 동 지표와 지니계수의 총수요 효과를 비교하였다. 분석 결과, 소득불평등 지표의 종류에 따라 불평등의 총수요 효과가 상반되게 나타났다. 상위 10%의 소득 비중을 불평등 지표로 사용한 경우 소득불평등 증대가 투자와 수출을 중심으로 총수요에 전반적으로 긍정적인 영향을 미친 반면, 지니계수를 불평등 지표로 사용한 경우에는 소비와 투자에 부정적 영향, 수출에는 긍정적 영향을 주는 등 효과의 방향이 혼재하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 불평등 지표의 종류에 따른 총수요 효과의 차이는 소득불평등 증대가 대내적으로 교육에 대한 투자 감소 등을 통해 소비 및 물적자본 투자를 저해하는 반면, 대외적으로는 노동소득분배율 하락과 이로 인한 가격경쟁력 강화를 통해 수출과 투자에 긍정적 영향을 줄 수 있다는 선행연구의 이론적 논의에 근거하여 설명할 수 있다.