Search

Purpose: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) aberrations have been identified in pediatric-type infant gliomas, but their occurrence across age groups, functional effects, and treatment response has not been broadly established. Experimental Design: We performed a comprehensive analysis of ALK expression and genomic aberrations in both newly generated and retrospective data from 371 glioblastomas (156 adult, 205 infant/pediatric, and 10 congenital) with in vitro and in vivo validation of aberrations. Results: ALK aberrations at the protein or genomic level were detected in 12% of gliomas (45/371) in a wide age range (0–80 years). Recurrent as well as novel ALK fusions (LRRFIP1–ALK, DCTN1–ALK, PRKD3–ALK) were present in 50% (5/10) of congenital/infant, 1.4% (3/205) of pediatric, and 1.9% (3/156) of adult GBMs. ALK fusions were present as the only candidate driver in congenital/infant GBMs and were sometimes focally amplified. In contrast, adult ALK fusions co-occurred with other oncogenic drivers. No activating ALK mutations were identified in any age group. Novel and recurrent ALK rearrangements promoted STAT3 and ERK1/2 pathways and transformation in vitro and in vivo. ALK-fused GBM cellular and mouse models were responsive to ALK inhibitors, including in patient cells derived from a congenital GBM. Relevant to the treatment of infant gliomas, we showed that ALK protein appears minimally expressed in the forebrain at perinatal stages, and no gross effects on perinatal brain development were seen in pregnant mice treated with the ALK inhibitor ceritinib. Conclusions: These findings support use of brain-penetrant ALK inhibitors in clinical trials across infant, pediatric, and adult GBMs.

Supplementary Figure 3: PPP1CB-ALK fusion is oncogenic and sensitive to targeted therapy. A. Immunoblot analysis of ALK downstream signaling proteins in cortical mNSC (CTX#6) and brainstem mNSC (BS#3) expressing PPP1CB-ALK. Cells were treated for 4 hours with ceritinib and lorlatinib at the indicated concentrations.B. Left panel: Soft agar colony-forming assay using stable mNSC PPP1CB-ALK demonstrated colony formation with dose-dependent inhibition by ceritinib. mNSC KRAS did not respond to ceritinib validating the drug specificity. Right panel: Quantification of colony formation under targeted drug inhibition using CellProfiler. Values represent colony counts relative to the untreated group ± s.d. The mean of three independent replicates is shown. Significance between treatments determined by the Mann-Whitney test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.C. Cell viability of ceritinib-treated PPP1CB-ALK NIH-3T3 relative to eGFP-positive cells by CellTiterGlo.D. Relative viability of the ALK wild-type GBM line (BT164) and BT1857 lorlatinib-treated cells versus DMSO control.E. Relative viability of BT164 and BT1857 ceritinib-treated cells versus DMSO control.F. Relative viability of BT164 and BT1857 cells treated with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib.G. Pharmacodynamic analysis of NIH 3T3-PPP1CB-ALK s.c. tumors treated with vehicle or ceritinib at 30mg/kg for 5 days. Representative H&E stain, ALK, pSTAT3, pAKT S473 and Ki-67 IHC.H. Quantification of Ki-67-positive cells in vehicle and ceritinib-treated tumors using CellProfiler software. Error bars show standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05.I. Quantification of pSTAT3-positive cells in vehicle and ceritinib-treated tumors using CellProfiler software. Error bars show standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05.J. Tumor growth following subcutaneous implantation of PPP1CB-ALK and eGFP-expressing fibroblasts.K. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of SCID mice injected subcutaneously with mNSC CTX-PPP1CB-ALK (red, n = 5) or mNSC CTX-eGFP (black, n = 4) and treated with ceritinib at 30mg/kg/d for 15 days. Mice were euthanized at endpoint (tumor volume of 2000mm3). The grey area represents the treatment period.L. Vehicle or ceritinib-treated mouse weights at start and end of treatment.

Supplementary Figure 5: Single-cell RNA Sequencing and IHC examination of ALK in human neural development and immature neural cells. A. 2D representation of human brain cell subtypes (48 samples) during cortex development using a single cell RNA-seq atlas (cortex-dev.cells.ucsc.edu) shows that ALK transcript appears to be enriched in a certain cell type. Color-coded by ALK gene expression (beige to red) and age in weeks (rainbow).B. ALK-stained sagittal section of normal human cerebellum at 15 postconceptional weeks (pcw).C. ALK-stained sagittal section of human fetal neural stem cell pellets at 13 postconceptional weeks (pcw).D. ALK-stained sagittal section of human fetal neural stem cell pellets at 15 postconceptional weeks (pcw).

Purpose:Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) aberrations have been identified in pediatric-type infant gliomas, but their occurrence across age groups, functional effects, and treatment response has not been broadly established.Experimental Design:We performed a comprehensive analysis of ALK expression and genomic aberrations in both newly generated and retrospective data from 371 glioblastomas (156 adult, 205 infant/pediatric, and 10 congenital) with in vitro and in vivo validation of aberrations.Results:ALK aberrations at the protein or genomic level were detected in 12% of gliomas (45/371) in a wide age range (0–80 years). Recurrent as well as novel ALK fusions (LRRFIP1–ALK, DCTN1–ALK, PRKD3–ALK) were present in 50% (5/10) of congenital/infant, 1.4% (3/205) of pediatric, and 1.9% (3/156) of adult GBMs. ALK fusions were present as the only candidate driver in congenital/infant GBMs and were sometimes focally amplified. In contrast, adult ALK fusions co-occurred with other oncogenic drivers. No activating ALK mutations were identified in any age group. Novel and recurrent ALK rearrangements promoted STAT3 and ERK1/2 pathways and transformation in vitro and in vivo. ALK-fused GBM cellular and mouse models were responsive to ALK inhibitors, including in patient cells derived from a congenital GBM. Relevant to the treatment of infant gliomas, we showed that ALK protein appears minimally expressed in the forebrain at perinatal stages, and no gross effects on perinatal brain development were seen in pregnant mice treated with the ALK inhibitor ceritinib.Conclusions:These findings support use of brain-penetrant ALK inhibitors in clinical trials across infant, pediatric, and adult GBMs.

Supplementary Figure 6: Single cell RNA sequencing comparison of ALK expression and other infant/pediatric glioma kinase drivers in developing human and mouse brain. A. 2D representation of human brain cell subtypes (48 samples) during cortex development using a single cell RNA-seq atlas (http://cells.ucsc.edu/?ds=cortex-dev) shows that ALK positive cells make up less than 1% of all cells in the dataset and aren't localized within a specific cluster.B. Cluster-level summary of the human scRNA dataset shows that ALK expression (TPM) is decreased compared to EGFR, NTRK2, and NTRK3, and ALK positive cells make up a much lower percentage of each cluster compared to those 3 genes.C. 2D representation of developmental mouse forebrain (E12.5 – P6) in a single cell RNA-seq atlas (http://cc-shiny-01.functionalgenomics.ca/braindex/clusters) shows similar results as seen in the human scRNA Nowakowski dataset.D. Cluster-level summary of the mouse scRNA dataset corroborates results seen in the Nowkowski scRNA dataset; that Alk expression (log-normalized) is decreased, and less prevalent than EGFR, NTRK2, and NTRK3.E. 2D representation of RNA sequencing data for NTRK1-3 genes in the Nowakowski developing human cortex dataset. Compared to ALK expression, the NTRK genes have increased expression levels, increased prevalence in the dataset, and show increased localization to specific cluster.F. Similar to (E), the 2D representation of Ntrk genes in the developing mouse scRNA dataset shows increased expression and prevalence compared to Alk.

Supplementary Figure 2: T1 post-contrast axial and sagittal images of ALK-fused and non ALK-altered GBMs and ALK staining in ALK-fused congenital GBMs. A. Example images from patients with ALK aberrations (76, 89, 116, 197)B. In contrast to those without ALK aberrations (right columns). Contrast is gadolinium for those where applicable and show enhancement within both the tumor categories.C. Representative H&E and ALK IHCs of congenital GBM harboring an ALK fusion.

Supplementary Figure 4: Characterization of the lung cancer recurrent DCTN1-ALK fusion identified in cGBM (case ALK.232). A. Integrative Genomic Viewer (IGV) screenshot of the DCTN1-ALK variant.B. Predicted sequence of DCTN1-ALK fusion (DCTN1 exon 1-26, ALK exon 20-29 conserved).C. PDX DCTN1-ALK sub-renal capsule engraftment confimed by IHC.C. Relative viability of the ALK wild-type GBM line (BT164) and BT1857 ceritinib-treated cells versus DMSO control.D. Relative viability of BT164 and BT1857 lorlatinib-treated cells versus DMSO control.E. Relative viability of BT164 and BT1857 cells treated with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib.F. PDX DCTN1-ALK sub-renal capsule engraftment confirmed by IHC.

Supplementary Figure 1: Characterization of the novel LRRFIP1-ALK fusion (case ALK.223) A. Visualization of the read coverage at the fusion sites in ALK and LRRFIP1 genes using Integrative Genomic Viewer.B. Pile-up plot generated by SvABA using whole-genome sequencing data shows the breakpoint coordinates.C. Copy number ratio profile by WGS showing no somatic copy number alterations anywhere in the genome. The x-axis represents the chromosomes.D. Copy number ratio profile on chromosome 2 showing no copy number change of ALK and LRRFIP1 genes.E. Two RT-PCR products of 186bp (variant 1) and 189bp (variant 3) were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis with total RNA from tumor specimen ALK.223.F. Primer sequences of ALK-LRRFIP1 (variants 1 and 2) and LRRFIP1-ALK (variant 3) and the predicted DNA product size.G. Western Blot analysis of ALK signaling pathway in subcutaneous tumors treated with vehicle or lorlatinib. Normal brain was used as control.H. Representative 40x images and CellProfiler quantification of Cleaved Caspase 3- and Ki-67- stained subcutaneous tumors.

Additional information tables 1 to 8.

Purpose: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) aberrations have been identified in pediatric type infant gliomas, but their occurrence across age groups, functional effects, and treatment response have not been broadly established. Experimental Design: We performed a comprehensive analysis of ALK expression and genomic aberrations in both newly-generated and retrospective data from 371 glioblastomas (156 adult, 205 infant/pediatric and 10 congenital) with in vitro and in vivo validation of aberrations. Results: ALK aberrations at the protein or genomic level were detected in 12% of gliomas (45/371) in a wide age range (0-80 years). Recurrent as well as novel ALK fusions (LRRFIP1-ALK, DCTN1-ALK, PRKD3-ALK) were present in 50% (5/10) of congenital/infant, 1.4% (3/205) of pediatric, and 1.9% (3/156) of adult GBMs. ALK fusions were present as the only candidate driver in congenital/infant GBMs, and were sometimes focally amplified. In contrast, adult ALK fusions co-occurred with other oncogenic drivers. No activating ALK mutations were identified in any age group. Novel and recurrent ALK rearrangements promoted STAT3 and ERK1/2 pathways and transformation in vitro and in vivo. ALK-fused GBM cellular and mouse models were responsive to ALK inhibitors, including in patient cells derived from a congenital GBM. Relevant to treatment of infant gliomas, we showed that ALK protein appears minimally expressed in the forebrain at perinatal stages and no gross effects on perinatal brain development was seen in pregnant mice treated with the ALK inhibitor ceritinib. Conclusions: These findings support expanded evaluation of brain-penetrant ALK inhibitors in clinical trials across infant, pediatric, and adult GBMs. Citation Format: Anne-Florence Blandin, Ross Giglio, Maya Srikanth Graham, Guadalupe Garcia, Seth Malinowski, Jared K. Woods, Shakti Ramkissoon, Lori Ramkissoon, Frank Dubois, Kate Schoolcraft, Jessica W. Tsai, Dayle K. Wang, Robert Jones, Jayne Vogelzang, Kristine Pelton, Sarah Becker, Fiona Watkinson, Claire Sinai, Elizabeth Cohen, Matthew Booker, Michael Tolstorukov, Veerle Haemels, Liliana Goumnerova, Karen Wright, Mark Kieran, Katie Fehnel, David Reardon, Arnault Tauziede-Espariat, Rishi Lulla, Benjamin Carcamo, Stanley Chaleff, Alain Charest, Frederik De Smet, Azra H. Ligon, Adrian Dubuc, Melanie Pagès, Pascale Varlet, Patrick Wen, Brian Alexander, Susan Chi, Sanda Alexandrescu, Ralf Kittler, Robert Bachoo, Rameen Beroukhim, Pratiti Bandopadhayay, Keith L. Ligon. ALK amplification and rearrangements are recurrent targetable events in congenital and adult glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1201.

INTRODUCTION: Choroid plexus tumors (CPT) are rare, potentially aggressive CNS tumors with defined histologic criteria for grading. In recent years, several patients within our practice have demonstrated discordance between histological diagnosis and clinical behavior. DNA methylation profiling has emerged as a potential diagnostic adjunct for aiding clinical planning and treatment approach. In this study, we sought to retrospectively evaluate the clinical utility of DNA methylation profiling within our cohort of patients with CPT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with choroid plexus tumors treated at Dana-Farber / Boston’s Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center between 1990-2021, evaluating the histology, treatment approach, and clinical outcome. Available tissue samples were sent to the National Institute of Health for DNA methylation profiling. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with CPT were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 1.8 years (range: 0.4-27.7). Histologic diagnosis included choroid plexus papilloma (CPP; n=4), atypical choroid plexus papilloma (aCPP; n=5), and choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC, n=8). DNA methylation in an initial subset placed these tumors with the pediatric type A (n=5), pediatric type B (n=6), and adult (n=1) subgroups. For one patient, methylation profiling returned as unclassifiable (possibly representing an alternative diagnosis). Discrepancies with the histologic grade were noted in several cases: one patient diagnosed with CPP grouped with pediatric type B CPT on methylation analysis, had rapid recurrence, and a diagnosis of CPC was made on a re-resection specimen; another patient with aCPP with concerning features was classified as pediatric type A by methylation, and is without evidence of disease after initial complete resection. Survival outcomes based on histologic diagnosis and molecular subgroups are compared and reported. CONCLUSION: DNA methylation profiling is a useful tool for the diagnosis of CPT and may have the potential to guide clinical planning and management.