Search

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMT) are a widely expressed class of enzymes responsible for catalyzing arginine methylation on numerous protein substrates. Among them, type I PRMTs are responsible for generating asymmetric dimethylarginine. By controlling multiple basic cellular processes, such as DNA damage responses, transcriptional regulation, and mRNA splicing, type I PRMTs contribute to cancer initiation and progression. A type I PRMT inhibitor, GSK3368715, has been developed and has entered clinical trials for solid and hematologic malignancies. Although type I PRMTs have been reported to play roles in modulating immune cell function, the immunologic role of tumor-intrinsic pathways controlled by type I PRMTs remains uncharacterized. Here, our The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset analysis revealed that expression of type I PRMTs associated with poor clinical response and decreased immune infiltration in patients with melanoma. In cancer cell lines, inhibition of type I PRMTs induced an IFN gene signature, amplified responses to IFN and innate immune signaling, and decreased expression of the immunosuppressive cytokine VEGF. In immunocompetent mouse tumor models, including a model of T-cell exclusion that represents a common mechanism of anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) resistance in humans, type I PRMT inhibition increased T-cell infiltration, produced durable responses dependent on CD8+ T cells, and enhanced efficacy of anti–PD-1 therapy. These data indicate that type I PRMT inhibition exhibits immunomodulatory properties and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to induce durable antitumor responses in a T cell–dependent manner, suggesting that type I PRMT inhibition can potentiate an antitumor immunity in refractory settings.

Supplementary Figure from Inhibiting Type I Arginine Methyltransferase Activity Promotes T Cell–Mediated Antitumor Immune Responses

Supplementary Table from Inhibiting Type I Arginine Methyltransferase Activity Promotes T Cell–Mediated Antitumor Immune Responses

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMT) are a widely expressed class of enzymes responsible for catalyzing arginine methylation on numerous protein substrates. Among them, type I PRMTs are responsible for generating asymmetric dimethylarginine. By controlling multiple basic cellular processes, such as DNA damage responses, transcriptional regulation, and mRNA splicing, type I PRMTs contribute to cancer initiation and progression. A type I PRMT inhibitor, GSK3368715, has been developed and has entered clinical trials for solid and hematologic malignancies. Although type I PRMTs have been reported to play roles in modulating immune cell function, the immunologic role of tumor-intrinsic pathways controlled by type I PRMTs remains uncharacterized. Here, our The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset analysis revealed that expression of type I PRMTs associated with poor clinical response and decreased immune infiltration in patients with melanoma. In cancer cell lines, inhibition of type I PRMTs induced an IFN gene signature, amplified responses to IFN and innate immune signaling, and decreased expression of the immunosuppressive cytokine VEGF. In immunocompetent mouse tumor models, including a model of T-cell exclusion that represents a common mechanism of anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) resistance in humans, type I PRMT inhibition increased T-cell infiltration, produced durable responses dependent on CD8+ T cells, and enhanced efficacy of anti–PD-1 therapy. These data indicate that type I PRMT inhibition exhibits immunomodulatory properties and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to induce durable antitumor responses in a T cell–dependent manner, suggesting that type I PRMT inhibition can potentiate an antitumor immunity in refractory settings.

Supplementary Figures S1-S6

PDF file - 276K

Frequency of recurrent mutations in the AML cohort

GEO data sets

Oligonucleotide sequences

Drug response of sequenced patient-derived cases

Recent results from clinical trials with the BRAF inhibitors GSK2118436 (dabrafenib) and PLX4032 (vemurafenib) have shown encouraging response rates; however, the duration of response has been limited. To identify determinants of acquired resistance to GSK2118436 and strategies to overcome the resistance, we isolated GSK2118436 drug-resistant clones from the A375 BRAFV600E and the YUSIT1 BRAFV600K melanoma cell lines. These clones also showed reduced sensitivity to the allosteric mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal–regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor GSK1120212 (trametinib). Genetic characterization of these clones identified an in-frame deletion in MEK1 (MEK1K59del) or NRAS mutation (NRASQ61K and/or NRASA146T) with and without MEK1P387S in the BRAFV600E background and NRASQ61K in the BRAFV600K background. Stable knockdown of NRAS with short hairpin RNA partially restored GSK2118436 sensitivity in mutant NRAS clones, whereas expression of NRASQ61K or NRASA146T in the A375 parental cells decreased sensitivity to GSK2118436. Similarly, expression of MEK1K59del, but not MEK1P387S, decreased sensitivity of A375 cells to GSK2118436. The combination of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 effectively inhibited cell growth, decreased ERK phosphorylation, decreased cyclin D1 protein, and increased p27kip1 protein in the resistant clones. Moreover, the combination of GSK2118436 or GSK1120212 with the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mTOR inhibitor GSK2126458 enhanced cell growth inhibition and decreased S6 ribosomal protein phosphorylation in these clones. Our results show that NRAS and/or MEK mutations contribute to BRAF inhibitor resistance in vitro, and the combination of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 overcomes this resistance. In addition, these resistant clones respond to the combination of GSK2126458 with GSK2118436 or GSK1120212. Clinical trials are ongoing or planned to test these combinations. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(4); 909–20. ©2012 AACR.

Primary AML

Disruption of epigenetic regulation is a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but epigenetic therapy is complicated by the complexity of the epigenome. Herein, we developed a long-term primary AML ex vivo platform to determine whether targeting different epigenetic layers with 5-azacytidine and LSD1 inhibitors would yield improved efficacy. This combination was most effective in TET2mut AML, where it extinguished leukemia stem cells and particularly induced genes with both LSD1-bound enhancers and cytosine-methylated promoters. Functional studies indicated that derepression of genes such as GATA2 contributes to drug efficacy. Mechanistically, combination therapy increased enhancer–promoter looping and chromatin-activating marks at the GATA2 locus. CRISPRi of the LSD1-bound enhancer in patient-derived TET2mut AML was associated with dampening of therapeutic GATA2 induction. TET2 knockdown in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells induced loss of enhancer 5-hydroxymethylation and facilitated LSD1-mediated enhancer inactivation. Our data provide a basis for rational targeting of cooperating aberrant promoter and enhancer epigenetic marks driven by mutant epigenetic modifiers.Significance:Somatic mutations of genes encoding epigenetic modifiers are a hallmark of AML and potentially disrupt many components of the epigenome. Our study targets two different epigenetic layers at promoters and enhancers that cooperate to aberrant gene silencing, downstream of the actions of a mutant epigenetic regulator.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 813

Mutational frequency in patient-derived AML specimens

Disruption of epigenetic regulation is a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but epigenetic therapy is complicated by the complexity of the epigenome. Herein, we developed a long-term primary AML ex vivo platform to determine whether targeting different epigenetic layers with 5-azacytidine and LSD1 inhibitors would yield improved efficacy. This combination was most effective in TET2mut AML, where it extinguished leukemia stem cells and particularly induced genes with both LSD1-bound enhancers and cytosine-methylated promoters. Functional studies indicated that derepression of genes such as GATA2 contributes to drug efficacy. Mechanistically, combination therapy increased enhancer–promoter looping and chromatin-activating marks at the GATA2 locus. CRISPRi of the LSD1-bound enhancer in patient-derived TET2mut AML was associated with dampening of therapeutic GATA2 induction. TET2 knockdown in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells induced loss of enhancer 5-hydroxymethylation and facilitated LSD1-mediated enhancer inactivation. Our data provide a basis for rational targeting of cooperating aberrant promoter and enhancer epigenetic marks driven by mutant epigenetic modifiers. Significance: Somatic mutations of genes encoding epigenetic modifiers are a hallmark of AML and potentially disrupt many components of the epigenome. Our study targets two different epigenetic layers at promoters and enhancers that cooperate to aberrant gene silencing, downstream of the actions of a mutant epigenetic regulator. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 813

Epigenetic regulators are recurrently mutated and aberrantly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Targeted therapies designed to inhibit these chromatin-modifying enzymes, such as the histone demethylase lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) and the histone methyltransferase DOT1L, have been developed as novel treatment modalities for these often refractory diseases. A common feature of many of these targeted agents is their ability to induce myeloid differentiation, suggesting that multiple paths toward a myeloid gene expression program can be engaged to relieve the differentiation blockade that is uniformly seen in AML. We performed a comparative assessment of chromatin dynamics during the treatment of mixed lineage leukemia (MLL)-AF9-driven murine leukemias and MLL-rearranged patient-derived xenografts using 2 distinct but effective differentiation-inducing targeted epigenetic therapies, the LSD1 inhibitor GSK-LSD1 and the DOT1L inhibitor EPZ4777. Intriguingly, GSK-LSD1 treatment caused global gains in chromatin accessibility, whereas treatment with EPZ4777 caused global losses in accessibility. We captured PU.1 and C/EBPα motif signatures at LSD1 inhibitor-induced dynamic sites and chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing revealed co-occupancy of these myeloid transcription factors at these sites. Functionally, we confirmed that diminished expression of PU.1 or genetic deletion of C/EBPα in MLL-AF9 cells generates resistance of these leukemias to LSD1 inhibition. These findings reveal that pharmacologic inhibition of LSD1 represents a unique path to overcome the differentiation block in AML for therapeutic benefit.

Recent results from clinical trials with the BRAF inhibitors GSK2118436 (dabrafenib) and PLX4032 (vemurafenib) have shown encouraging response rates; however, the duration of response has been limited. To identify determinants of acquired resistance to GSK2118436 and strategies to overcome the resistance, we isolated GSK2118436 drug-resistant clones from the A375 BRAFV600E and the YUSIT1 BRAFV600K melanoma cell lines. These clones also showed reduced sensitivity to the allosteric mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal–regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor GSK1120212 (trametinib). Genetic characterization of these clones identified an in-frame deletion in MEK1 (MEK1K59del) or NRAS mutation (NRASQ61K and/or NRASA146T) with and without MEK1P387S in the BRAFV600E background and NRASQ61K in the BRAFV600K background. Stable knockdown of NRAS with short hairpin RNA partially restored GSK2118436 sensitivity in mutant NRAS clones, whereas expression of NRASQ61K or NRASA146T in the A375 parental cells decreased sensitivity to GSK2118436. Similarly, expression of MEK1K59del, but not MEK1P387S, decreased sensitivity of A375 cells to GSK2118436. The combination of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 effectively inhibited cell growth, decreased ERK phosphorylation, decreased cyclin D1 protein, and increased p27kip1 protein in the resistant clones. Moreover, the combination of GSK2118436 or GSK1120212 with the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mTOR inhibitor GSK2126458 enhanced cell growth inhibition and decreased S6 ribosomal protein phosphorylation in these clones. Our results show that NRAS and/or MEK mutations contribute to BRAF inhibitor resistance in vitro, and the combination of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 overcomes this resistance. In addition, these resistant clones respond to the combination of GSK2126458 with GSK2118436 or GSK1120212. Clinical trials are ongoing or planned to test these combinations. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(4); 909–20. ©2012 AACR.

A potent series of inhibitors against the B-RafV600E kinase have been developed that show excellent activity in cellular assays and good oral bioavailability in rats. The key structural features of the series are an arylsulfonamide headgroup, a thiazole core, and a fluorine ortho to the sulfonamide nitrogen.

SummaryEpigenetic dysregulation has emerged as an important mechanism in cancer. Alterations in epigenetic machinery have become a major focus for targeted therapies. The current report describes the discovery and biological activity of a cyclopropylamine containing inhibitor of Lysine Demethylase 1 (LSD1), GSK2879552. This small molecule is a potent, selective, orally bioavailable, mechanism-based irreversible inactivator of LSD1. A proliferation screen of cell lines representing a number of tumor types indicated that small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is sensitive to LSD1 inhibition. The subset of SCLC lines and primary samples that undergo growth inhibition in response to GSK2879552 exhibit DNA hypomethylation of a signature set of probes, suggesting this may be used as a predictive biomarker of activity.

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway activation has been implicated in many types of human cancer. BRAF mutations that constitutively activate MAPK signalling and bypass the need for upstream stimuli occur with high prevalence in melanoma, colorectal carcinoma, ovarian cancer, papillary thyroid carcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma. In this report we characterize the novel, potent, and selective BRAF inhibitor, dabrafenib (GSK2118436). Cellular inhibition of BRAF(V600E) kinase activity by dabrafenib resulted in decreased MEK and ERK phosphorylation and inhibition of cell proliferation through an initial G1 cell cycle arrest, followed by cell death. In a BRAF(V600E)-containing xenograft model of human melanoma, orally administered dabrafenib inhibited ERK activation, downregulated Ki67, and upregulated p27, leading to tumor growth inhibition. However, as reported for other BRAF inhibitors, dabrafenib also induced MAPK pathway activation in wild-type BRAF cells through CRAF (RAF1) signalling, potentially explaining the squamous cell carcinomas and keratoacanthomas arising in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. In addressing this issue, we showed that concomitant administration of BRAF and MEK inhibitors abrogated paradoxical BRAF inhibitor-induced MAPK signalling in cells, reduced the occurrence of skin lesions in rats, and enhanced the inhibition of human tumor xenograft growth in mouse models. Taken together, our findings offer preclinical proof of concept for dabrafenib as a specific and highly efficacious BRAF inhibitor and provide evidence for its potential clinical benefits when used in combination with a MEK inhibitor.

Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes, mediated by aberrant DNA hypermethylation and repressive histone modifications, is a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Novel epigenetic therapies are emerging, but single-agent approaches targeting only one category of epigenetic marks have limited therapeutic activity. We show that combinatorial treatment strategy targeting epigenetic modifications of both promoter and enhancer elements can improve therapeutic intervention. As current cell lines do not accurately represent the heterogeneous nature of AML, we established an ex vivo culturing system enabling us to propagate primary AML specimens long enough to test epigenetic therapeutics (48 specimens expanded 4-6 weeks; 6 specimens expanded >12 months; 39 specimen fail to expand). We tested 52 expandable primary AMLs with a combination therapy utilizing the DNA demethylating agent 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza) and a novel small molecule inhibitor against LSD1, a histone demethylase that removes enhancer-associated marks (mono-/di-methylated histone H3 lysine 4; H3K4me1/2). In order to avoid DNA damage-induced cytotoxicity, we applied a non-DNA damaging dose of 5-Aza (≤ 200 nM). 5-Aza treatment had modest inhibition of cell growth for the majority of cases, but did not appreciably alter cell viability. Treatment with the LSD1 inhibitor (LSD1i) substantially impaired cell growth and survival of ~80% (p To gain insight into mechanism, we performed a genome-wide integrative analysis of the DNA methylome (Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing), LSD1 occupancy sites (ChIP-sequencing) and gene expression profiling (RNA-sequencing) in a TET2mut patient-derived AML sample. Single-agent LSD1i treatment led to induction of genes associated with myeloid differentiation. Even though 5-Aza induced substantial hypomethylation, there was only a minor effect on gene expression. However, combination therapy did induce greater de-repression of genes, in particular those where 5-Aza induced hypomethylation at promoters and at LSD1-occupied enhancers. Combination treatment especially potentiated induction of differentiation genes, suggesting potential anti-leukemia stem cell effects. Accordingly, combination therapy resulted in impaired colony formation potential (p=0.007). Moreover, limiting dilution analysis in NSG mice demonstrated significant impairment of leukemia-initiating cells (p=0.0025) after 5-Aza+LSD1i combination therapy when compared to either drug alone. To determine what genes mediate the effect of combination therapy, we studied genes preferentially induced by 5-Aza+LSD1i. GATA2, a transcription factor involved in hematopoietic differentiation, was more potently induced by combination therapy in primary AML samples vs. either drug alone. We found LSD1 occupied at the GATA2 distal hematopoietic enhancer and verified by using quantitative ChIP analysis that inhibition of LSD1 induced an increase of H3K4me2 and H3K27ac, a mark that reflects enhancer activation. Overexpression of GATA2 using viral transduction in two patient-derived AML cases caused partial differentiation and attenuated leukemia growth. These results indicated that cellular responses to combination therapy are in part mediated by induction of GATA2. In summary, our results provide a novel link for therapeutic approaches targeting redundant epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressors via cooperative enhancer and enhancer-promoter activation. Disclosures Duy: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Mohammad:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Smitheman:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Guzman:Cellectis: Research Funding. Kruger:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Creasy:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Levine:Novartis: Consultancy; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Melnick:Janssen: Research Funding.

Trimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27me3) is a repressive posttranslational modification mediated by the histone methyltransferase EZH2. EZH2 is a component of the polycomb repressive complex 2 and is overexpressed in many cancers. In B-cell lymphomas, its substrate preference is frequently altered through somatic mutation of the EZH2 Y641 residue. Herein, we identify mutation of EZH2 A677 to a glycine (A677G) among lymphoma cell lines and primary tumor specimens. Similar to Y641 mutant cell lines, an A677G mutant cell line revealed aberrantly elevated H3K27me3 and decreased monomethylated H3K27 (H3K27me1) and dimethylated H3K27 (H3K27me2). A677G EZH2 possessed catalytic activity with a substrate specificity that was distinct from those of both WT EZH2 and Y641 mutants. Whereas WT EZH2 displayed a preference for substrates with less methylation [unmethylated H3K27 (H3K27me0):me1:me2 k cat / K m ratio = 9:6:1] and Y641 mutants preferred substrates with greater methylation (H3K27me0:me1:me2 k cat / K m ratio = 1:2:13), the A677G EZH2 demonstrated nearly equal efficiency for all three substrates (H3K27me0:me1:me2 k cat / K m ratio = 1.1:0.6:1). When transiently expressed in cells, A677G EZH2, but not WT EZH2, increased global H3K27me3 and decreased H3K27me2. Structural modeling of WT and mutant EZH2 suggested that the A677G mutation acquires the ability to methylate H3K27me2 through enlargement of the lysine tunnel while preserving activity with H3K27me0/me1 substrates through retention of the Y641 residue that is crucial for orientation of these smaller substrates. This mutation highlights the interplay between Y641 and A677 residues in the substrate specificity of EZH2 and identifies another lymphoma patient population that harbors an activating mutation of EZH2.

Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a histone H3K4me1/2 demethylase found in various transcriptional co-repressor complexes. LSD1 mediated H3K4 demethylation can result in a repressive chromatin environment that silences gene expression and has been shown to play a role in hematopoietic differentiation. LSD1 is also overexpressed in multiple tumor types. These studies implicate LSD1 as a key regulator of the epigenome that modulates gene expression through post-translational modification of histones and its presence in transcriptional complexes. The current study describes the anti-tumor effects of a novel, irreversible, GSK LSD1 inhibitor (GSK2879552) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). GSK2879552 is a potent, selective, mechanism-based inhibitor of LSD1. Screening of over 150 cancer cell lines revealed that AML and SCLC cells have a unique requirement for LSD1. While GSK2879552 treatment did not affect the global levels of H3K4me1 or H3K4me2, local changes in these histone marks were observed near transcriptional start sites of genes whose expression increased with LSD1 inhibition. Treatment of AML cell lines with GSK2879552 increased cell surface expression of CD11b and CD86, markers associated with a differentiated immunophenotype. Six days of GSK2879552 treatment resulted in potent anti-proliferative growth effects in 19 of 25 AML cell lines representing a range of AML subtypes. Treating for longer time periods revealed sensitivity in all AML cell lines. AML blast colony forming ability was also inhibited in 4 of 5 bone marrow samples derived from primary AML patient samples. The effects of LSD1 inhibition were further characterized in vivo using a mouse model of AML induced by transduction of mouse hematopoietic progenitor cells with a retrovirus encoding MLL-AF9 and GFP. Primary AML cells were transplanted into a cohort of secondary recipient mice and were treated upon engraftment. After 17 days of treatment, control mice had 80% GFP+ cells in the bone marrow whereas treated mice had only 2.8% GFP positive cells (p Growth inhibition was also observed in a subset of SCLC cell lines. GSK2879552 treatment of mice engrafted with SCLC lines resulted in greater than 80% tumor growth inhibition. Studies using patient derived primary SCLC showed similar efficacy demonstrating the growth inhibition of SCLC with an LSD1 inhibitor extended beyond cell lines. Together, these data demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of LSD1 may provide a promising treatment for AML and SCLC. A Phase I clinical trial using GSK2879552 was initiated in March, 2014. All studies were conducted in accordance with the GSK Policy on the Care, Welfare and Treatment of Laboratory Animals and were reviewed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee either at GSK or by the ethical review process at the institution where the work was performed. Citation Format: Kimberly Smitheman, Monica Cusan, Yan Liu, Michael Butticello, Melissa Pappalardi, James Foley, Kelly Federowicz, Glenn Van Aller, Jiri Kasparec, Xinrong Tian, Dominic Suarez, Jess Schneck, Jeff Carson, Patrick McDevitt, Thau Ho, Charles McHugh, William Miller, Scott Armstrong, Christine Hann, Neil Johnson, Ryan G. Kruger, Helai P. Mohammad, Shekhar Kamat. Inhibition of LSD1 for the treatment of cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3513. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3513

Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a histone H3K4me1/2 demethylase found in various transcriptional co-repressor complexes. These complexes include Histone Deacetylases (HDAC1/2) and Co-Repressor for Element-1-Silencing Transcription factor (CoREST). LSD1 mediated H3K4 demethylation can result in a repressive chromatin environment that silences gene expression. LSD1 has been shown to play a role in development in various contexts. LSD1 can interact with pluripotency factors in human embryonic stem cells and is important for decommissioning enhancers in stem cell differentiation. Beyond embryonic settings, LSD1 is also critical for hematopoietic differentiation. LSD1 is overexpressed in multiple cancer types and recent studies suggest inhibition of LSD1 reactivates the all-trans retinoic acid receptor pathway in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These studies implicate LSD1 as a key regulator of the epigenome that modulates gene expression through post-translational modification of histones and through its presence in transcriptional complexes. The current study describes the anti-tumor effects of a novel LSD1 inhibitor (GSK2879552) in AML. GSK2879552 is a potent, selective, mechanism-based, irreversible inhibitor of LSD1. Screening of over 150 cancer cell lines revealed that AML cells have a unique requirement for LSD1. While LSD1 inhibition did not affect the global levels of H3K4me1 or H3K4me2, local changes in these histone marks were observed near transcriptional start sites of putative LSD1 target genes. This increase in the transcriptionally activating histone modification correlated with a dose dependent increase in gene expression. Treatment with GSK2879552 promoted the expression of cell surface markers, including CD11b and CD86, associated with a differentiated immunophenotype in 12 of 13 AML cell lines. For example, in SKM-1 cells, increases in cell surface expression of CD86 and CD11b occurred after as early as one day of treatment with EC50 values of 13 and 7 nM respectively. In a separate study using an MV-4-11 engraftment model, increases in CD86 and CD11b were observed as early as 8 hours post dosing. GSK2879552 treatment resulted in a potent anti-proliferative growth effect in 19 of 25 AML cell lines (average EC50 = 38 nM), representing a range of AML subtypes. Potent growth inhibition was also observed on AML blast colony forming ability in 4 out of 5 bone marrow samples derived from primary AML patient samples (average EC50 = 205 nM). The effects of LSD1 inhibition were further characterized in an in vivo mouse model of AML induced by transduction of mouse hematopoietic progenitor cells with a retrovirus encoding MLL-AF9 and GFP. Primary AML cells were transplanted into a cohort of secondary recipient mice and upon engraftment, the mice were treated for 17 days. After 17 days of treatment, control treated mice had 80% GFP+ cells in the bone marrow whereas treated mice possessed 2.8% GFP positive cells (p Together, these data demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of LSD1 may provide a promising treatment for AML by promoting differentiation and subsequent growth inhibition of AML blasts. GSK2879552 is currently in late preclinical development and clinical trials are anticipated to start in 2014. All studies were conducted in accordance with the GSK Policy on the Care, Welfare and Treatment of Laboratory Animals and were reviewed the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee either at GSK or by the ethical review process at the institution where the work was performed. Disclosures: Kruger: GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Mohammad:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Smitheman:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Liu:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Pappalardi:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Federowicz:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Van Aller:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Kasparec:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Tian:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Suarez:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Rouse:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Schneck:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Carson:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. McDevitt:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Ho:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. McHugh:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Miller:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Johnson:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Armstrong:Epizyme Inc.: Has consulted for Epizyme Inc. Other. Tummino:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals: Employment.

Trimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27me3) is a repressive post-translational modification mediated by the histone methyltransferase EZH2. EZH2 is a component of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) and its expression and catalytic activity are dysregulated in cancers. While EZH2 may be over-expressed as a result of multiple mechanisms in tumors, only somatic mutation of the EZH2 Y641 residue has thus far been reported to alter its substrate preference and enhance its catalytic efficiency to generate H3K27me3. Herein, we report mutation of the A677 residue of EZH2 to a glycine (A677G) in a lymphoma cell line with aberrantly elevated H3K27me3 levels. Additional EZH2 sequence analysis in 41 primary lymphoma specimens identified another occurrence of this mutation. Biochemical evaluation of recombinant EZH2 complexes revealed that A677G EZH2 possesses catalytic activity with substrate specificity that is novel and distinct from those of wild-type and Y641 mutants. Whereas wild-type EZH2 displayed a preference for substrates with less methylation (i.e. H3K27me0>me1>me2), the Y641 mutants exhibited greatly decreased activity with H3K27me0 and increased activity with H3K27me2. The A677G EZH2, on the other hand, exhibited nearly equal efficiency for all three substrates. A677G EZH2, but not wild-type EZH2, was shown to be capable of significantly increasing global H3K27me3 when transiently expressed in an EZH2 wild-type cancer cell line. Finally, structural modeling suggests that the mutation results in a larger lysine tunnel capable of accommodating the H3K27me2 substrate while retaining the ability to properly orient H3K27me0 and H3K27me1 with the Y641 residue. In addition, functional and biochemical analyses are performed with reversible SAM-competitive EZH2 inhibitors. Therefore, this mutation appears to contribute to the aberrant epigenetic profile observed in certain lymphomas. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1057. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1057

Recent results from clinical trials with the BRAF inhibitors PLX4032 and GSK2118436 have shown encouraging clinical response rates; however, acquired resistance has limited response duration. In an effort to identify determinants of acquired resistance to GSK2118436 and strategies to overcome the resistance, we isolated nine GSK2118436 resistant clones derived from A375 BRAFV600E melanoma cell line (IC50=0.028μM). In three day cell growth assays, the resistant clones were insensitive to the BRAF inhibitors GSK2118436 (IC50>10μM) and PLX4032 (IC50>10μM). In addition, they displayed greater than 10-fold less sensitivity to an allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/2, GSK1120212 (IC50>0.06μM), as compared to the parental A375 cells (IC50=0.005μM). Genetic characterization of these clones by Sanger sequencing identified an in-frame deletion in MEK1 (MEK1K59del), or NRAS mutations (NRASQ61K and/or NRASA146T) with and without a MEK1P387S mutation. In addition, all clones retained the BRAFV600E mutation and no additional mutations were identified in BRAF, KRAS, HRAS, ARAF, CRAF or PTEN. Stable knockdown of NRAS by shRNA partially restored GSK2118436 sensitivity in the NRAS mutant clones. Expression of mutant NRAS in the parental cells decreased sensitivity to GSK2118436 similar to that observed in the NRAS mutant clones. Similarly, expression of MEK1K59del, but not MEK1P387S, decreased sensitivity of the parental cells to GSK2118436. In three day growth assays, treatment of the resistant clones with GSK2118436 in combination with GSK1120212 enhanced cell growth inhibition 19 to 50% at the IC50 of the combination and was ≥3-fold more potent than the most active single agent, GSK1120212. Sustained treatment of greater than ten days with this combination inhibited >90% of cell growth compared to 30–70% with GSK1120212 alone. By western blot analysis, the combination of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 effectively decreased ERK phosphorylation and cyclin D1 protein, and increased p27kip1 protein levels in all resistant clones. S6 ribosomal protein phosphorylation was not completely inhibited in all clones with this combination. In contrast, the combination of GSK2118436 or GSK1120212 with the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor GSK2126458 effectively blocked S6 ribosomal protein phosphorylation in the resistant clones. Decreases in ERK phosphorylation and cyclin D1 protein were similar to the combination of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212. The addition of GSK2118436 to GSK2126458 was slightly more potent (∼2-fold) than GSK2126458 alone and enhanced cell growth inhibition 12 to 35% at the IC50 for the combination in 5/7 clones with NRAS mutation and both MEK1K59del clones. The combination of GSK1120212 and GSK2126458 was >2-fold more potent than the most active single agent and enhanced cell growth inhibition by 23 to 33% in all the resistant clones. This combination was synergistic (combination index = 0.24–0.75) in 8/9 clones. Taken together these results demonstrate that mutation within NRAS or MEK contribute to resistance to BRAF inhibitors in BRAFV600E mutant melanoma. These resistant cells are responsive to the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, as well as BRAF or MEK inhibitors with PI3K/mTOR inhibitors. Clinical trials are ongoing or planned to test these combinations. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B71.

EZH2 is the catalytic subunit of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) responsible for methylating histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27) and repressing transcription of target genes. PRC2 activity is essential for maintaining the self-renewal capacity of embryonic and adult stem cells and the dynamic regulation of this activity is critical for proper development and differentiation. Dysregulation of H3K27 methylation is implicated in tumorigenesis and occurs through multiple mechanisms. Elevated levels of EZH2 are known to correlate with poor prognosis in a number of solid tumors including prostate and breast. Inactivating mutations in UTX, an H3K27 demethylase which acts in opposition to EZH2, have been described in several tumor types including multiple myeloma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma. More recently, somatic mutations in EZH2 were identified in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), follicular lymphoma (FL), and GCB diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While the mutations in MDS are often homozygous and encompass missense, nonsense, and frame shift mutations at multiple regions of the protein, the mutations in DLBCL and FL are heterozygous and occur at a single residue (Y641) suggesting that the effect of these mutations on PRC2 activity could be quite different between MDS and lymphoma. Utilizing a biochemical approach with recombinant PRC2 containing either wild-type or mutant EZH2, we demonstrate that Y641 mutants exhibit an altered substrate preference. In contrast to wild-type EZH2 which prefers an unmodified or mono-methylated K27 residue, Y641 mutants act primarily on a di-methylated H3K27 with little activity for unmodified or mono-methylated K27. Consistent with these biochemical data, we find that when compared to wild-type lymphoma cell lines those harboring Y641 mutations have elevated levels of H3K27me3 and reduced H3K27me2. To further characterize the substrate specificity of PRC2 complexes containing either WT or mutant EZH2, we utilized an epigenetic peptide library which contained unmodified and modified peptides from histone H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. In addition, we have conducted cell-based studies to understand the effect of these mutations on H3 methylation and the regulation of EZH2 target genes. These data and the implications of these findings for the treatment of FL and DLBCL will be discussed. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-186. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-LB-186

Activation of the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK pathway has been implicated in a large range of human cancers. Growth factor receptor stimulation by extracellular ligands activates Ras, which then sets in motion a signal transduction cascade through the Raf, MEK and ERK serine/threonine kinases. Mutation of the B-Raf kinase constitutively activates MAPK signalling, thus bypassing the need for upstream stimuli. This has been genetically associated with several human cancers, especially occurrence of the B-RafV600E mutant and its high prevalence in melanoma, colorectal carcinoma, ovarian cancer, papillary thyroid carcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma. The ability to selectively and potently inhibit B-Raf should provide a potential therapy for patients with mutant B-Raf tumors, for which addictive dependency on this pathway is observed. We have identified a novel, potent, and selective Raf kinase inhibitor that is capable of inhibiting the kinase activity of wild-type B-Raf, B-RafV600E and c-Raf with IC50 values of 3.2, 0.8, and 5.0 nM, respectively. Kinase panel screening for over 270 kinases has indicated that this inhibitor is selective for Raf kinase, with ∼400 fold selectivity towards B-Raf over 91% of the other kinases tested. Specific cellular inhibition of B-RafV600E kinase by this inhibitor leads to decreased ERK phosphorylation and inhibition of cell proliferation by an initial arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, followed by cell death. This inhibition is selective for cancer cells that specifically encode the mutation for B-RafV600E. Oral compound administration inhibits the growth of B-RafV600E mutant melanoma (A375P) and colon cancer (Colo205) human tumor xenografts, growing subcutaneously in immuno-compromised mice. This cell-specific B-RafV600E inhibitor is currently being evaluated in a human Phase I clinical trial. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):B88.