Search

Circle graphs are intersection graphs of chords of a circle. In this paper, we present a new algorithm for the circle graph isomorphism problem running in time $O((n+m)\alpha(n+m))$ where $n$ is the number of vertices, $m$ is the number of edges and $\alpha$ is the inverse Ackermann function. Our algorithm is based on the minimal split decomposition [Cunnigham, 1982] and uses the state-of-art circle graph recognition algorithm [Gioan, Paul, Tedder, Corneil, 2014] in the same running time. It improves the running time $O(nm)$ of the previous algorithm [Hsu, 1995] based on a similar approach.

Comparability graphs are graphs which have transitive orientations. The dimension of a poset is the least number of linear orders whose intersection gives this poset. The dimension ${\rm dim}(X)$ of a comparability graph $X$ is the dimension of any transitive orientation of X, and by $k$-DIM we denote the class of comparability graphs $X$ with ${\rm dim}(X) \le k$. It is known that the complements of comparability graphs are exactly function graphs and permutation graphs equal 2-DIM. In this paper, we characterize the automorphism groups of permutation graphs similarly to Jordan's characterization for trees (1869). For permutation graphs, there is an extra operation, so there are some extra groups not realized by trees. For $k \ge 4$, we show that every finite group can be realized as the automorphism group of some graph in $k$-DIM, and testing graph isomorphism for $k$-DIM is GI-complete.

A graph $G$ covers a graph $H$ if there exists a locally bijective homomorphism from $G$ to $H$. We deal with regular covers in which this locally bijective homomorphism is prescribed by an action of a subgroup of ${\rm Aut}(G)$. Regular covers have many applications in constructions and studies of big objects all over mathematics and computer science. We study computational aspects of regular covers that have not been addressed before. The decision problem RegularCover asks for two given graphs $G$ and $H$ whether $G$ regularly covers $H$. When $|H|=1$, this problem becomes Cayley graph recognition for which the complexity is still unresolved. Another special case arises for $|G| = |H|$ when it becomes the graph isomorphism problem. Therefore, we restrict ourselves to graph classes with polynomially solvable graph isomorphism. Inspired by Negami, we apply the structural results used by Babai in the 1970's to study automorphism groups of graphs. Our main result is the following FPT meta-algorithm: Let $\cal C$ be a class of graphs such that the structure of automorphism groups of 3-connected graphs in $\cal C$ is simple. Then we can solve RegularCover for $\cal C$-inputs $G$ in time $O^*(2^{e(H)/2})$ where $e(H)$ denotes the number of the edges of $H$. As one example of $\cal C$, this meta-algorithm applies to planar graphs. In comparison, testing general graph covers is known to be NP-complete for planar inputs $G$ even for small fixed graphs $H$ such as $K_4$ or $K_5$. Most of our results also apply to general graphs, in particular the complete structural understanding of regular covers for 2-cuts., Comment: The conference version accepted to ICALP 2014

Klavik et al. [arXiv:1207.6960] recently introduced a generalization of recognition called the bounded representation problem which we study for the classes of interval and proper interval graphs. The input gives a graph G and in addition for each vertex v two intervals L_v and R_v called bounds. We ask whether there exists a bounded representation in which each interval I_v has its left endpoint in L_v and its right endpoint in R_v. We show that the problem can be solved in linear time for interval graphs and in quadratic time for proper interval graphs. Robert's Theorem states that the classes of proper interval graphs and unit interval graphs are equal. Surprisingly the bounded representation problem is polynomially solvable for proper interval graphs and NP-complete for unit interval graphs [Klav\'{\i}k et al., arxiv:1207.6960]. So unless P = NP, the proper and unit interval representations behave very differently. The bounded representation problem belongs to a wider class of restricted representation problems. These problems are generalizations of the well-understood recognition problem, and they ask whether there exists a representation of G satisfying some additional constraints. The bounded representation problems generalize many of these problems.

We study the computational complexity of graph planarization via edge contraction. The problem CONTRACT asks whether there exists a set $S$ of at most $k$ edges that when contracted produces a planar graph. We work with a more general problem called $P$-RESTRICTEDCONTRACT in which $S$, in addition, is required to satisfy a fixed MSOL formula $P(S,G)$. We give an FPT algorithm in time $O(n^2 f(k))$ which solves $P$-RESTRICTEDCONTRACT, where $P(S,G)$ is (i) inclusion-closed and (ii) inert contraction-closed (where inert edges are the edges non-incident to any inclusion minimal solution $S$). As a specific example, we can solve the $\ell$-subgraph contractibility problem in which the edges of a set $S$ are required to form disjoint connected subgraphs of size at most $\ell$. This problem can be solved in time $O(n^2 f'(k,\ell))$ using the general algorithm. We also show that for $\ell \ge 2$ the problem is NP-complete.

The problem Cover(H) asks whether an input graph G covers a fixed graph H (i.e., whether there exists a homomorphism G to H which locally preserves the structure of the graphs). Complexity of this problem has been intensively studied. In this paper, we consider the problem PlanarCover(H) which restricts the input graph G to be planar. PlanarCover(H) is polynomially solvable if Cover(H) belongs to P, and it is even trivially solvable if H has no planar cover. Thus the interesting cases are when H admits a planar cover, but Cover(H) is NP-complete. This also relates the problem to the long-standing Negami Conjecture which aims to describe all graphs having a planar cover. Kratochvil asked whether there are non-trivial graphs for which Cover(H) is NP-complete but PlanarCover(H) belongs to P. We examine the first nontrivial cases of graphs H for which Cover(H) is NP-complete and which admit a planar cover. We prove NP-completeness of PlanarCover(H) in these cases., Comment: Full version (including Appendix) of a paper from the conference WG 2011