6 results on '"Krueger RF"'
Search Results
2. Profiling pathological narcissism according to DSM–5 domains and traits: A study on consecutively admitted Italian psychotherapy patients
- Author
-
Kristian E. Markon, Serena Borroni, Robert F. Krueger, Antonella Somma, Andrea Fossati, Aaron L. Pincus, Fossati, A, Somma, A, Borroni, S, Pincus, Al, Markon, Ke, and Krueger, Rf
- Subjects
050103 clinical psychology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Psychotherapist ,Dark triad ,Narcissistic Personality Inventory ,media_common.quotation_subject ,05 social sciences ,Sadistic personality disorder ,050109 social psychology ,medicine.disease ,Personality disorders ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Clinical Psychology ,Narcissistic personality disorder ,medicine ,Narcissism ,Personality ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,medicine.symptom ,Personality Assessment Inventory ,Psychology ,Psychiatry ,Clinical psychology ,media_common - Abstract
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 29(11) of Psychological Assessment (see record 2016-56886-001). In the article, several values were reversed and the mean was misreported in Table 2. The corrected table is present in the erratum.] Pathological narcissism represents a clinically relevant, albeit controversial personality construct, with multiple conceptualizations that are operationalized by different measures. Even in the recently published Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5), 2 different views of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) are formulated (i.e., Section II and Section III). The DSM-5 Section III alternative PD model diagnosis of NPD is based on self and interpersonal dysfunction (Criterion A) and a profile of maladaptive personality traits (Criterion B), specifically elevated scores on Attention Seeking and Grandiosity. Given the diversity of conceptualizations of pathological narcissism, we evaluated the convergences and divergences in DSM-5 trait profiles characterizing multiple measures of narcissism in a clinical sample of 278 consecutively admitted Italian psychotherapy patients. Patients were administered the Italian versions of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) and 4 measures of NPD, (a) the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI); (b) the NPD scale of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+; (c) the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis II Personality Disorders, Version 2.0 (SCID-II) as an observer-rated measure of NPD; and (d) the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI). Multiple regression analyses showed that PID-5 traits explained from 13% to more than 60% of the variance in the different NPD measures. Attention Seeking was consistently associated with all measures of NPD, whereas Grandiosity was associated with some of the NPD measures. All measures of NPD were also significantly related to additional DSM-5 maladaptive traits. (PsycINFO Database Record
- Published
- 2017
3. Testing relationships between DSM–5 Section III maladaptive traits and measures of self and interpersonal impairment in Italian community dwelling adults
- Author
-
Kristian E. Markon, Serena Borroni, Robert F. Krueger, Andrea Fossati, Antonella Somma, Fossati, Andrea, Borroni, Serena, Somma, A, Markon, Ke, and Krueger, Rf
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,050103 clinical psychology ,Coping (psychology) ,Personality Inventory ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Personality Disorders ,DSM-5 ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Adaptation, Psychological ,Criterion validity ,Humans ,Personality ,Interpersonal Relations ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Cooperative Behavior ,Big Five personality traits ,media_common ,Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ,05 social sciences ,Cooperativeness ,Middle Aged ,030227 psychiatry ,Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Clinical Psychology ,Italy ,Trait ,Female ,Self Report ,Personality Assessment Inventory ,Psychology ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
In order to study the relationships between DSM-5 Section III maladaptive personality traits and personality dysfunction, 312 Italian community dwelling adults completed the Italian translations of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) and the Measure of Disordered Personality Functioning Scale (MDPF); participants were also administered the Iowa Personality Disorder Screen (IPDS). Consistent with previous findings, 22 (88.0%) PID-5 maladaptive trait scales showed moderate and significant correlations with MDPF Non Coping (median r value = .32), and Non Cooperativeness, (median r value = .24) scales. Regression analyses showed that PID-5 trait scales explained roughly 59% and 35% of the variance in MDPF Non Coping and Non Cooperativeness scales, respectively. PID-5 traits were significantly associated also with the IPDS total score, adjusted R2 = .45, p < .001. As a whole, our data seemed to indicate that the wide majority of the PID-5 scales showed significant relationships of at least moderate size with a self-report measure of personality dysfunction, lending further support to the criterion validity of the PID-5. (PsycINFO Database Record
- Published
- 2017
4. Genetic variants linked to education predict longevity
- Author
-
Chris Power, Gail Davies, Ilaria Gandin, Panagiotis Deloukas, Jennifer E. Huffman, Pascal Timshel, Albert V. Smith, A. Kong, Paul Lichtenstein, Joseph K. Pickrell, Philipp Koellinger, P. L. De Jager, Reedik Mägi, G. B. Chen, Neil Pendleton, B. V. Halldórsson, George Dedoussis, Antti-Pekka Sarin, Natalia Pervjakova, Veikko Salomaa, Simona Vaccargiu, Ozren Polasek, K. H. Jöckel, Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Y. Milaneschi, Jessica D. Faul, Patricia A. Boyle, Patrik K. E. Magnusson, Igor Rudan, Christopher P. Nelson, Vilmundur Gudnason, John Attia, Jürgen Wellmann, Kristi Läll, Konstantin Strauch, Stuart J. Ritchie, Markus Perola, Nicola Pirastu, Klaus Bønnelykke, Robert Karlsson, R. de Vlaming, Liisa Keltigangas-Jarvinen, Thomas Meitinger, Riccardo E. Marioni, Anu Loukola, Barbera Franke, Reinhold Schmidt, Maël Lebreton, Sven Oskarsson, E. Mihailov, Harm-Jan Westra, David R. Weir, Aldi T. Kraja, Niek Verweij, Peter M. Visscher, Hans-Jörgen Grabe, Johannes H. Brandsma, Mark Adams, R. J. Scott, G. Thorleifsson, Tõnu Esko, Mika Kähönen, Saskia P. Hagenaars, Patrick Turley, Johannes Waage, Peter Lichtner, Dragana Vuckovic, Antonietta Robino, Henry Völzke, Lydia Quaye, C. de Leeuw, Marika Kaakinen, Wei Zhao, Abdel Abdellaoui, Reka Nagy, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Johan G. Eriksson, Alan F. Wright, Andres Metspalu, Lavinia Paternoster, Momoko Horikoshi, Jan A. Staessen, Tarunveer S. Ahluwalia, Tian Liu, Martin Kroh, Aldo Rustichini, Giorgia Girotto, Cristina Venturini, Lili Milani, Jennifer A. Smith, Ginevra Biino, Tessel E. Galesloot, Michael A. Horan, Gerardus A. Meddens, James F. Wilson, Francesco Cucca, Peter Vollenweider, Erika Salvi, P. J. van der Most, Jari Lahti, Campbell A, David Laibson, Andrew Bakshi, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Tomi Mäki-Opas, Andreas J. Forstner, C M van Duijn, Nicholas G. Martin, Jonathan Marten, Ute Bültmann, Olli T. Raitakari, David A. Bennett, A.G. Uitterlinden, J. E. De Neve, Ingrid B. Borecki, WD Hill, Bo Jacobsson, Antti Latvala, Katri Räikkönen, Michael B. Miller, Jonathan P. Beauchamp, S. J. van der Lee, Ilja Demuth, Stavroula Kanoni, Veronique Vitart, Elina Hyppönen, N. Eklund, Francesco P. Cappuccio, Robert F. Krueger, Maria Pina Concas, Jaime Derringer, F. J.A. Van Rooij, Helena Schmidt, Patrick J. F. Groenen, Valur Emilsson, Rico Rueedi, Aysu Okbay, Georg Homuth, Edith Hofer, W. E. R. Ollier, Hannah Campbell, Paolo Gasparini, Mark Alan Fontana, Magnus Johannesson, Seppo Koskinen, Christopher F. Chabris, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Christine Meisinger, Kari Stefansson, Jun Ding, Tia Sorensen, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx, Michelle N. Meyer, James J. Lee, Diego Vozzi, Gonneke Willemsen, K. Petrovic, Sarah E. Medland, Mary F. Feitosa, Henning Tiemeier, L. J. Launer, William G. Iacono, Massimo Mangino, Tune H. Pers, S. E. Baumeister, Christopher Oldmeadow, Grant W. Montgomery, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Jaakko Kaprio, Catharine R. Gale, S.F.W. Meddens, Kevin Thom, Klaus Berger, Pablo V. Gejman, Lude Franke, Gyda Bjornsdottir, Daniel J. Benjamin, Steven F. Lehrer, Krista Fischer, Alan R. Sanders, S. Ulivi, Katharina E. Schraut, Tim D. Spector, Amy Hofman, Matt McGue, Terho Lehtimäki, D. C. Liewald, Hans Bisgaard, L. Eisele, Astanand Jugessur, George Davey Smith, T.B. Harris, A.R. Thurik, Cornelius A. Rietveld, David Schlessinger, Z. Kutalik, David J. Porteous, Lynne J. Hocking, N J Timpson, A. Palotie, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Ian J. Deary, Sharon L.R. Kardia, Peter K. Joshi, Nilesh J. Samani, Michael A. Province, Börge Schmidt, Richa Gupta, Carmen Amador, Erin B. Ware, Joyce Y. Tung, Ioanna-Panagiota Kalafati, Lars Bertram, Caroline Hayward, P. van der Harst, Penelope A. Lind, Kadri Kaasik, N.A. Furlotte, Sarah E. Harris, B. St Pourcain, Susan M. Ring, Zhihong Zhu, Alexander Teumer, Behrooz Z. Alizadeh, Judith M. Vonk, Blair H. Smith, A Payton, Wouter J. Peyrot, Jacob Gratten, Douglas F. Levinson, C Gieger, Leanne M. Hall, Andrew Heath, Mario Pirastu, Peter Eibich, Nancy L. Pedersen, Ronny Myhre, Antonio Terracciano, David M. Evans, Raymond A. Poot, Uwe Völker, Dorret I. Boomsma, Clemens Baumbach, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Ivana Kolcic, Jia-Shu Yang, Dalton Conley, A. A. Vinkhuyzen, Danielle Posthuma, Karl-Oskar Lindgren, Olga Rostapshova, Jonas Bacelis, Daniele Cusi, Yong Qian, Bjarni Gunnarsson, George McMahon, Elizabeth G. Holliday, Pamela A. F. Madden, David A. Hinds, David Cesarini, Jianxin Shi, Najaf Amin, Dale R. Nyholt, Applied Economics, Epidemiology, Real World Studies in PharmacoEpidemiology, -Genetics, -Economics and -Therapy (PEGET), Groningen Institute for Gastro Intestinal Genetics and Immunology (3GI), Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Aletta Jacobs School of Public Health, Public Health Research (PHR), Stem Cell Aging Leukemia and Lymphoma (SALL), Cardiovascular Centre (CVC), Amsterdam Neuroscience - Complex Trait Genetics, Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience - Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Stress & Sleep, EMGO - Mental health, Complex Trait Genetics, Biological Psychology, Marioni, RE, Ritchie, SJ, Joshi, PK, Hagenaars, SP, Hypponen, E, Benjamin, DJ, Social Science Genetic Association Consortium, Marioni, Re, Ritchie, Sj, Joshi, Pk, Hagenaars, Sp, Okbay, A, Fischer, K, Adams, Mj, Hill, Wd, Davies, G, Nagy, R, Amador, C, Läll, K, Metspalu, A, Liewald, Dc, Campbell, A, Wilson, Jf, Hayward, C, Esko, T, Porteous, Dj, Gale, Cr, Deary, Ij, Beauchamp, Jp, Fontana, Ma, Lee, Jj, Pers, Th, Rietveld, Ca, Turley, P, Chen, Gb, Emilsson, V, Meddens, Sf, Oskarsson, S, Pickrell, Jk, Thom, K, Timshel, P, de Vlaming, R, Abdellaoui, A, Ahluwalia, T, Bacelis, J, Baumbach, C, Bjornsdottir, G, Brandsma, Jh, Concas, MARIA PINA, Derringer, J, Furlotte, Na, Galesloot, Te, Girotto, Giorgia, Gupta, R, Hall, Lm, Harris, Se, Hofer, E, Horikoshi, M, Huffman, Je, Kaasik, K, Kalafati, Ip, Karlsson, R, Kong, A, Lahti, J, van der Lee, Sj, de Leeuw, C, Lind, Pa, Lindgren, Ko, Liu, T, Mangino, M, Marten, J, Mihailov, E, Miller, Mb, van der Most, Pj, Oldmeadow, C, Payton, A, Pervjakova, N, Peyrot, Wj, Qian, Y, Raitakari, O, Rueedi, R, Salvi, E, Schmidt, B, Schraut, Ke, Shi, J, Smith, Av, Poot, Ra, St Pourcain, B, Teumer, A, Thorleifsson, G, Verweij, N, Vuckovic, Dragana, Wellmann, J, Westra, Hj, Yang, J, Zhao, W, Zhu, Z, Alizadeh, Bz, Amin, N, Bakshi, A, Baumeister, Se, Biino, G, Bønnelykke, K, Boyle, Pa, Campbell, H, Cappuccio, Fp, De Neve, Je, Deloukas, P, Demuth, I, Ding, J, Eibich, P, Eisele, L, Eklund, N, Evans, Dm, Faul, Jd, Feitosa, Mf, Forstner, Aj, Gandin, Ilaria, Gunnarsson, B, Halldórsson, Bv, Harris, Tb, Heath, Ac, Hocking, Lj, Holliday, Eg, Homuth, G, Horan, Ma, Hottenga, Jj, de Jager, Pl, Jugessur, A, Kaakinen, Ma, Kähönen, M, Kanoni, S, Keltigangas Järvinen, L, Kiemeney, La, Kolcic, I, Koskinen, S, Kraja, At, Kroh, M, Kutalik, Z, Latvala, A, Launer, Lj, Lebreton, Mp, Levinson, Df, Lichtenstein, P, Lichtner, P, Loukola, A, Madden, Pa, Mägi, R, Mäki Opas, T, Marques Vidal, P, Meddens, Ga, Mcmahon, G, Meisinger, C, Meitinger, T, Milaneschi, Y, Milani, L, Montgomery, Gw, Myhre, R, Nelson, Cp, Nyholt, Dr, Ollier, We, Palotie, A, Paternoster, L, Pedersen, Nl, Petrovic, Ke, Räikkönen, K, Ring, Sm, Robino, Antonietta, Rostapshova, O, Rudan, I, Rustichini, A, Salomaa, V, Sanders, Ar, Sarin, Ap, Schmidt, H, Scott, Rj, Smith, Bh, Smith, Ja, Staessen, Ja, Steinhagen Thiessen, E, Strauch, K, Terracciano, A, Tobin, Md, Ulivi, Sheila, Vaccargiu, S, Quaye, L, van Rooij, Fj, Venturini, C, Vinkhuyzen, Aa, Völker, U, Völzke, H, Vonk, Jm, Vozzi, Diego, Waage, J, Ware, Eb, Willemsen, G, Attia, Jr, Bennett, Da, Berger, K, Bertram, L, Bisgaard, H, Boomsma, Di, Borecki, Ib, Bultmann, U, Chabris, Cf, Cucca, F, Cusi, D, Dedoussis, Gv, van Duijn, Cm, Eriksson, Jg, Franke, B, Franke, L, Gasparini, Paolo, Gejman, Pv, Gieger, C, Grabe, Hj, Gratten, J, Groenen, Pj, Gudnason, V, van der Harst, P, Hinds, Da, Hoffmann, W, Iacono, Wg, Jacobsson, B, Järvelin, Mr, Jöckel, Kh, Kaprio, J, Kardia, Sl, Lehtimäki, T, Lehrer, Sf, Magnusson, Pk, Martin, Ng, Mcgue, M, Pendleton, N, Penninx, Bw, Perola, M, Pirastu, Nicola, Pirastu, M, Polasek, O, Posthuma, D, Power, C, Province, Ma, Samani, Nj, Schlessinger, D, Schmidt, R, Sørensen, Ti, Spector, Td, Stefansson, K, Thorsteinsdottir, U, Thurik, Ar, Timpson, Nj, Tiemeier, H, Tung, Jy, Uitterlinden, Ag, Vitart, V, Vollenweider, P, Weir, Dr, Wright, Af, Conley, Dc, Krueger, Rf, Smith, Gd, Hofman, A, Laibson, Di, Medland, Se, Meyer, Mn, Johannesson, M, Visscher, Pm, Koellinger, Pd, Cesarini, D, and Benjamin, Dj
- Subjects
Netherlands Twin Register (NTR) ,0301 basic medicine ,Male ,Parents ,education: longevity: prediction: polygenic score [genetics] ,Multifactorial Inheritance ,polygenic ,Lebenserwartung ,Cohort Studies ,0302 clinical medicine ,Databases, Genetic ,Medicine ,genetics ,polygenic score ,longevity, education, gene ,Soziales und Gesundheit ,media_common ,Aged, 80 and over ,education ,Multidisciplinary ,Longevity ,Middle Aged ,Biobank ,humanities ,3. Good health ,Urological cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 15] ,Cohort ,Educational Status ,Female ,Cohort study ,Estonia ,education, longevity, polygenic ,Offspring ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Kultursektor ,Prognose ,Lernen ,Lower risk ,Education ,03 medical and health sciences ,longevity ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Commentaries ,Polygenic score ,Journal Article ,Genetics ,Humans ,Non-Profit-Sektor ,Genetic Association Studies ,Aged ,Neurodevelopmental disorders Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 7] ,business.industry ,ta1184 ,Genetic Variation ,prediction ,Educational attainment ,United Kingdom ,Gesundheitsstatistik ,030104 developmental biology ,Genetic epidemiology ,Scotland ,Gesundheitszustand ,Genetische Forschung ,business ,Prediction ,Bildung ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Demography - Abstract
Educational attainment is associated with many health outcomes, including longevity. It is also known to be substantially heritable. Here, we used data from three large genetic epidemiology cohort studies (Generation Scotland, n = ∼17,000; UK Biobank, n = ∼115,000; and the Estonian Biobank, n = ∼6,000) to test whether education-linked genetic variants can predict lifespan length. We did so by using cohort members' polygenic profile score for education to predict their parents' longevity. Across the three cohorts, meta-analysis showed that a 1 SD higher polygenic education score was associated with ∼2.7% lower mortality risk for both mothers (total n deaths = 79,702) and ∼2.4% lower risk for fathers (total n deaths = 97,630). On average, the parents of offspring in the upper third of the polygenic score distribution lived 0.55 y longer compared with those of offspring in the lower third. Overall, these results indicate that the genetic contributions to educational attainment are useful in the prediction of human longevity. Marioni RE, Ritchie SJ, Joshi PK, Hagenaars SP, Okbay A, Fischer K, Adams MJ, Hill WD, Davies G, Social Science Genetic Association Consortium, Nagy R, Amador C, Läll K, Metspalu A, Liewald DC, Campbell A, Wilson JF, Hayward C, Esko T, Porteous DJ, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, vol. 113, no. 47, pp. 13366-13371, 2016 Refereed/Peer-reviewed
- Published
- 2016
5. A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) With the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) in Predicting the General Level of Personality Pathology Among Community Dwelling Subjects
- Author
-
Antonella Somma, Kristian E. Markon, Serena Borroni, Andrea Fossati, Cesare Maffei, Robert F. Krueger, Fossati, A, Somma, A, Borroni, S, Maffei, C, Markon, Ke, and Krueger, Rf
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,050103 clinical psychology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Personality Inventory ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Personality Disorders ,DSM-5 ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Self-report inventory ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,Personality ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Psychiatry ,media_common ,05 social sciences ,Multilevel model ,Personality pathology ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Personality disorders ,Iowa ,030227 psychiatry ,Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Clinical Psychology ,Trait ,Female ,Independent Living ,Self Report ,Personality Assessment Inventory ,Psychology - Abstract
In order to evaluate if measures of DSM-5 Alternative PD Model domains predicted interview-based scores of general personality pathology when compared to self-report measures of DSM-IV Axis II/DSM-5 Section II PD criteria, 300 Italian community adults were administered the Iowa Personality Disorder Screen (IPDS) interview, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), and the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+). Multiple regression analyses showed that the five PID-5 domain scales collectively explained an adequate rate of the variance of the IPDS interview total score. This result was slightly lower than the amount of variance in the IPDS total score explained by the 10 PDQ-4+ scales. The PID-5 traits scales performed better than the PDQ-4+, although the difference was marginal. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that the PID-5 domain and trait scales provided a moderate, but significant increase in the prediction of the general level of personality pathology above and beyond the PDQ-4+ scales.
- Published
- 2016
6. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form: Evidence for Reliability and Construct Validity in a Sample of Community-Dwelling Italian Adolescents
- Author
-
Kristian E. Markon, Andrea Fossati, Robert F. Krueger, Serena Borroni, Antonella Somma, Fossati, Andrea, Somma, A, Borroni, S, Markon, Ke, and Krueger, Rf
- Subjects
Male ,050103 clinical psychology ,Psychometrics ,Adolescent ,Personality Inventory ,050109 social psychology ,Sample (statistics) ,Test validity ,Personality Disorders ,DSM-5 ,Developmental psychology ,Adjustment Disorders ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Applied Psychology ,Reliability (statistics) ,Adolescent psychology ,05 social sciences ,Construct validity ,Reproducibility of Results ,Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ,Clinical Psychology ,Italy ,Regression Analysis ,Female ,Personality Assessment Inventory ,Psychology - Abstract
To assess the reliability and construct validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) among adolescents, 877 Italian high school students were administered the PID-5-BF. Participants were administered also the Measure of Disordered Personality Functioning (MDPF) as a criterion measure. In the full sample, Cronbach’s alpha values for the PID-5-BF scales ranged from .59 (Detachment) to .77 (Psychoticism); in addition, all PID-5-BF scales showed mean interitem correlation values in the .22 to .40 range. Cronbach’s alpha values for the PID-5-BF total score was .83 (mean interitem r = .16). Although 2-month test–retest reliability could be assessed only in a small ( n = 42) subsample of participants, all PID-5-BF scale scores showed adequate temporal stability, as indexed by intraclass r values ranging from .78 (Negative Affectivity) to .97 (Detachment), all ps 2 = .17, p < .001, and Non-Coping scales, adjusted R2 = .32, p < .001. Similarly, the PID-5-BF total score was a significant predictor of both MDPF Non-Coping, and Non-Cooperativeness scales.
- Published
- 2015
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.