Search

BACKGROUNDDietary methyl donors might influence DNA methylation during carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, whether the influence of methyl donor intake is modified by polymorphisms in such epigenetic regulators is still unclear.AIMTo improve the current understanding of the molecular basis of CRC.METHODSA literature search in the Medline database, Reference Citation Analysis (https:// www.referencecitationanalysis.com/), and manual reference screening were performed to identify observational studies published from inception to May 2022.RESULTSA total of fourteen case-control studies and five cohort studies were identified. These studies included information on dietary methyl donors, dietary components that potentially modulate the bioavailability of methyl groups, genetic variants of methyl metabolizing enzymes, and/or markers of CpG island methylator phenotype and/or microsatellite instability, and their possible interactions on CRC risk.CONCLUSIONSeveral studies have suggested interactions between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms, methyl donor nutrients (such as folate) and alcohol on CRC risk. Moreover, vitamin B-6, niacin, and alcohol may affect CRC risk through not only genetic but also epigenetic regulation. Identification of specific mechanisms in these interactions associated with CRC may assist in developing targeted prevention strategies for individuals at the highest risk of developing CRC. Supported by The Basque Government (BIOMICs Research Group, MICROFLUIDICs & BIOMICs Cluster of the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU), No. IT1633-22.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological disease in developed countries. Although it is considered an indolent disease, advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinomas are characterized by poor prognosis. In the metastatic setting, after the failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, patients have limited therapeutic options. However, endometrial cancer should not be considered as a single entity but as a group of heterogeneous diseases with specific genomic, molecular, and biological features by suggested the analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Accumulating data highlighted the effectiveness and safety of the adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for several types of solid tumors. In particular, immunotherapy showed promising results in MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors. Endometrial cancer is not an exception. Endometrial cancer has the highest prevalence of MSI across human cancer types, and approximately 30% of primary endometrial cancers are MSI-H/dMMR and 13% to 30% of recurrent endometrial cancers are MSI-H/dMMR. The preliminary results of the KEYNOTE-158, the Australian NCT03015129 and the GARNET trial strongly supported the adoption of ICIs as monotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, after the failure of first-line treatments. Unfortunately, those impressive results are not achieved in patients with MMR proficient disease. Hence, other combinations were tested. In particular, the adoption of ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) showed very compelling results. Recently, the updated results of the KEYNOTE-775 showed that pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib led to significantly longer progression-free and overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with advanced endometrial cancer, irrespective of MMR status. After EMA approval, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib represents the new standard second-line treatment in endometrial cancer patients, regardless MMR status. Further studies are investigating the role of ICIs and TKIs in the first line and are testing new combinations (e.g. ICIs plus PARP inhibitors).

PURPOSE In patients with resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, surgery plus perioperative platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care. Perioperative chemotherapy remains debatable for gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H). PATIENTS AND METHODS NEONIPIGA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04006262 ) phase II study evaluated neoadjuvant nivolumab 240 mg once every two weeks ×6 and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every six weeks ×2, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab 480 mg once every four weeks (nine injections) in patients with locally advanced resectable dMMR/MSI-H, clinical (c) tumor (T)2-T4 node (N)x metastasis (M)0 gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary end point was a pathological complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS Between October 2019 and June 2021, 32 patients with dMMR/MSI-H gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled. The median age was 65.5 years (range, 40-80). Clinical stages were cT2-T3N0 (n = 9), cT2-T3N1 (n = 22), and cT3N1M1 (n = 1, wrongly included). With a median follow-up of 14.9 months (95% CI, 10.6 to 17.6), 32 patients received neoadjuvant immunotherapy (27 patients completed all cycles). Neoadjuvant therapy-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in six patients (19%). Twenty-nine patients underwent surgery; three did not have surgery and had complete endoscopic response with tumor-free biopsies and a normal computed tomography scan (two refused surgery and one had metastasis at inclusion). The rate of surgical morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification) was 55% (one postoperative death occurred). All 29 patients had an R0 resection, and 17 (58.6%; 90% CI, 41.8 to 74.1) had pCR (pathological T0N0). Becker tumor regression grades 1a, 1b, 2, and 3 were observed in 17 patients, three (including two pathological T0N1), two, and seven patients, respectively. Of the 29 patients with surgery, 23 received adjuvant nivolumab. At database lock, no patient had relapse and one died without relapse. CONCLUSION Nivolumab and ipilimumab-based neoadjuvant therapy is feasible and associated with no unexpected toxicity and a high pCR rate in patients with dMMR/MSI-H resectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Data on outcomes of microsatellite instable and/or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR/MSI) digestive non-colorectal tumors are limited.To evaluate overall survival (OS) of patients with dMMR/MSI digestive non-colorectal tumor.All consecutive patients with a dMMR/MSI digestive non-colorectal tumor were included in this French retrospective multicenter study.One hundred and sixteen patients were included with a mean age of 63.6 years and 32.6% with a Lynch syndrome. Most tumors were oesophago-gastric (54.3%) or small bowel (32.8%) adenocarcinomas and at a localized stage at diagnosis (86.7%). In patients with localized tumors and R0 resection, median OS was 134.0 ± 64.2 months. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 100.3 ± 65.7 months. Considering oesophago-gastric tumors, median DFS was improved when chemotherapy was added to surgery (not reached versus 22.8 ± 10.0 months, p = 0.03). In patients with advanced tumors treated by chemotherapy, median OS was 14.2 ± 1.9 months and median progression-free survival was 7.4 ± 1.6 months.dMMR/MSI digestive non-colorectal tumors are mostly diagnosed at a non-metastatic stage with a good prognosis. Advanced dMMR/MSI digestive non-colorectal tumors have a poor prognosis with standard chemotherapy.

Although the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is known to be linked to prognosis in various cancers, the prognostic impact and immunologic significance of the spatial heterogeneity of TILs have been rarely investigated. In this study, CD3+ and CD8+ TILs were quantified in independent cohorts (discovery, n = 73; and external validation, n = 93) of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) utilizing whole-slide image analysis of CD3/CD8 immunohistochemistry. The Shannon and Simpson indices, which measure intratumoral patch-to-patch evenness of TIL densities, were used to quantitatively assess the spatial heterogeneity of TILs in each case. To uncover immune-related gene expression signatures of spatial heterogeneity-based TIL subgroups of MSI-H CRCs, representative cases were subjected to GeoMx digital spatial profiler (DSP) analysis. As expected, a low density of TILs was significantly associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) in MSI-H CRCs. The TIL-low tumors were further classified into two subgroups based on the spatial heterogeneity of TILs: TIL-low/heterogeneity-high and TIL-low/heterogeneity-low subgroups. In both discovery and validation cohorts, the TIL-low/heterogeneity-high, TIL-low/heterogeneity-low, and TIL-high subgroups were significantly associated with poor, intermediate, and good DFS, respectively. In the DSP analysis, the TIL-low/heterogeneity-high subgroup showed higher spatial diversity in the expression of immune-related genes than that of the TIL-low/heterogeneity-low subgroup and exhibited upregulation of genes related to immune checkpoints, chemokine/cytokine receptors, and myeloid cells. TIL-low/heterogeneity-high tumors were also enriched with gene sets related to good response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In conclusion, TIL-low MSI-H CRCs are prognostically heterogeneous and can be divided into prognostically and immunologically distinct subgroups by considering the spatial heterogeneity of TILs. Our data suggest that intratumoral spatial heterogeneity of TILs can be used as a key element for clinically relevant immunologic subtyping of tumors.

The Regulator of Chromosome Condensation 2 (RCC2) is an important gene that regulates mitosis and cytoplasmic division in the cell cycle. Although there have been reported in several individual tumors, an integrative analysis of

In managing patients with solid tumors, the value of detecting the status of tumor DNA mismatch repair function is widely recognized. Mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry and molecular microsatellite instability testing constitute the two major test modalities currently in use, yet each is associated with caveats and limitations that can be consequential. Most notably, the traditional approach of defining mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry abnormality by complete loss of staining in all tumor cells is evolving. Partial or clonal loss is becoming recognized as a manifestation of gene abnormality; in some cases, such clonal loss is associated with germline pathogenic variants. The current criteria and cutoff values for defining microsatellite instability-high are developed primarily according to colorectal tumors. Non-colorectal cases, and occasionally even colorectal tumors, that are mismatch repair-deficient by immunohistochemistry but not microsatellite instability-high by current standards are being recognized. Emerging data suggest that these immunohistochemistry abnormal / non-microsatellite instability-high cases warrant further genetic workup for Lynch syndrome detection. Whether these tumors respond to immunotherapy is a question still to be addressed. It is imperative that pathologists as well as clinicians and investigators be aware of such intricacies regarding routine immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing and the results they generate. This review summarizes our current understanding of the advantages and limitations of these tests and offer our view on what constitutes the most optimal strategy in test selection and how best to utilize case context to enhance the interpretation of the test results.

Microsatellite unstable (MSI) colorectal cancers (CRCs) are due to DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and occurs in15% of non-metastatic diseases and 5% in the metastatic setting. Nearly 30% of MSI CRCs occur in a context of constitutional mutation of the MMR system (Lynch syndrome). Others are sporadic cancers linked to a hypermethylation of the MLH-1 promoter. The pathogenic alterations of MMR genes lead to the accumulation of frequent somatic mutational events and these tumours arbour a high antigen burden and are highly infiltrated with cytotoxic T-cell lymphocytes. Microsatellite instability/DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MSI/dMMR) status has prognostic and predictive implications in non-metastatic and metastatic CRCs. The prognostic value of MSI status in non-metastatic CRCs has been studied extensively, yet the data are more limited for its predictive value in terms of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy. In both cases (metastatic and non-metastatic settings) treatment with immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a remarkable effectiveness in the context of MSI/dMMR status. Indeed, recent data from prospective cohorts and randomised trials have shown a dramatical improvement of survival with immunotherapy (programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 [CTLA-4] blockage) in metastatic or non-metastatic MSI/dMMR CRC. In this review we report and discuss how and for whom to test for the MSI/dMMR phenotype, as well as the prognostic value of this phenotype and the new treatment recommendations options for this unique CRC population. Despite their efficacy, primary and secondary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are observed in more than 50% MSI-H/dMMR CRC patients and in the future how to identify these patients and to overcome resistance will be an important challenge.

Mitosis and spindle assembly require the microtubule-associated protein Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 (TPX2). Although TPX2 is highly expressed in several malignant tumor forms, little is known about its role in cancer. In this study, we performed the gene set enrichment analysis of TPX2 in 33 types of cancers and an extensive pan-cancer bioinformatic analysis using prognosis, tumor mutational burdens, microsatellite instability, tumor microenvironment, and immune cell infiltration data. According to the differential expression study, TPX2 was found to be overexpressed across all studied cancer types. Based on the survival analysis, increased TPX2 expression was associated with a poor prognosis for most cancers. The TPX2 expression level was confirmed to correlate with the clinical stage, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden across all cancer types. Furthermore, TPX2 expression has been linked to tumor microenvironments and immune cell infiltration, particularly in bladder urothelial carcinoma, liver hepatocellular carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, stomach adenocarcinoma, and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma. Finally, the gene set enrichment analysis implicated TPX2 in the regulation of aminoacyl tRNA biosynthesis, which is the most important tumor cell cycle signaling pathway. This comprehensive pan-cancer analysis shows that TPX2 is a prognostic molecular biomarker for most cancers and suggests its potential as an effective therapeutic target for the treatment of these diseases.

PurposeThis study was to investigate the frequency of mismatch repair deficiency/high microsatellite instability (MMRd/MSI-H) in gynecologic malignancies and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with recurrent gynecologic cancers according to MMR/MSI status.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a multi-center retrospective review on the patients who were diagnosed with gynecologic cancers between 2015 and 2020. Their clinicopathologic information, results of immunohistochemistry staining for MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2 and MSI analysis, tumor response to treatment with ICIs were investigated.ResultsAmong 1,093 patients included in the analysis, MMRd/MSI-H was most frequent in endometrial/uterine cancers (34.8%, 164/471), followed by ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers (12.8%, 54/422) and cervical cancer (11.3%, 21/186). When assessed by histology without regard for cancer types, the frequency of MMRd/MSI-H was 11.0% (38/345) in high-grade serous adenocarcinoma, 38.6% (117/303) in endometrioid adenocarcinoma, and 30.2% (16/53) in carcinosarcoma. A total of 114 patients were treated with ICIs at least once. The objective response rate (ORR) was 21.6% (8/37) in cervical cancer, 4.7% (2/43) in ovarian cancer, and 25.8% (8/31) in endometrial/uterine cancers. Univariate regression analysis identified MMRd/MSI-H as the only significant factor associated with the ORR (28.9% [11/38] vs. 11.8% [9/76]; odds ratio, 3.033; 95% confidence interval, 1.129–8.144; p=0.028).ConclusionThe frequency of MMRd/MSI-H is moderate to high in gynecologic cancers in the Korean population. MMRd/MSI-H could be effective predictive biomarkers in gynecologic cancers of any type.

Pucotenlimab (Puyouheng™) is a humanised immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) being developed by Lepu Biopharma for the treatment of solid tumours, including gastrointestinal cancer, metastatic melanoma, liver cancer, bladder cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer. Pucotenlimab binds to PD-1 and blocks its interaction with its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby restoring the ability of immune cells to target cancer cells. In July 2022, pucotenlimab received conditional first approval in China for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) solid tumours, including patients with advanced colorectal cancer who have experienced disease progression after previous therapy with fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, as well as patients with other advanced solid tumours who have experienced disease progression after previous first-line therapy and have no satisfactory treatment alternatives. In September 2022, pucotenlimab was approved in China for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanomas after the failure of previous systemic therapy. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of pucotenlimab leading to the first approval for the treatment of MSI-H/dMMR advanced solid tumours.

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) comprise a heterogeneous group of aggressive malignancies with unfavorable prognoses. The benefit of chemotherapy seems to have reached a bottleneck and, therefore, new effective therapeutic strategies for advanced BTCs are needed. Molecularly targeted therapies in selected patients are rapidly changing the situation. However, the low frequency of specific driver alterations in BTCs limits their wide application. Recently, immunotherapeutic approaches are also under active investigation in BTCs, but the role of immunotherapy in BTCs remains controversial.PubMed, Web of Science, and meeting resources were searched for relevant articles published from January 2017 to May 2022. The search aimed to identify current and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches for BTCs. Information on clinical trials was obtained from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ and http://www.chictr.org.cn/.Immunotherapy in BTC patients is currently under investigation, and most of the investigations focused on the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, only a subgroup of BTCs with microsatellite-instability high (MSI-H)/DNA mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) benefit from monotherapy of ICIs, and limited activity was observed in the second or subsequent settings. Nevertheless, promising results come from studies of ICIs in combination with other therapeutic approaches, including chemotherapy, in advanced BTCs, with a moderate toxicity profile. Recent studies demonstrated that compared to GEMCIS alone, durvalumab plus GEMCIS significantly improved patient survival (TOPAZ-1 trial) and that ICIs-combined chemoimmunotherapy is poised to become a new frontline therapy option, regardless of TMB and MMR/MSI status. Adoptive cell therapy and peptide- or dendritic-based cancer vaccines are other immunotherapeutic options that are being studied in BTCs. Numerous biomarkers have been investigated to define their predictive role in response to ICIs, but no predictive biomarker has been validated, except MSI-H/dMMR.The role of immunotherapy in BTCs is currently under investigation and the results of ongoing studies are eagerly anticipated. Several studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ICIs in combination with chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients, such as the phase III TOPAZ-1 trial, which will change the standard care of first-line chemotherapy for advanced BTCs. However, further research is needed to understand the best combination with immunotherapy and to discover more predictive biomarkers to guide clinical practice.

Cancer treatment is increasingly focused on targeting molecular alterations identified across different tumor histologies. While some oncogenic drivers such as microsatellite instability (MSI) and NTRK fusions are actionable with the very same approach regardless of tumor type ("histology-agnostic"), others require histology-specific therapeutic adjustment ("histology-tuned") by means of adopting specific inhibitors and ad hoc combinations. Among histology-agnostic therapies, pembrolizumab or dostarlimab demonstrated comparable activity in MSI metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as in other tumors with MSI status (ORR 38% vs 40% and 36% vs 39%, respectively), while entrectinib or larotrectinib proved effective in NTRK rearranged mCRC even though less dramatically than in the overall population (ORR 20% vs 57%, and 50% vs 78%, respectively). Histology-tuned approaches in mCRC are those targeting BRAF

BACKGROUND: In the phase II multicohort CheckMate 142 study, nivolumab plus low-dose (1 mg/kg) ipilimumab provided robust and durable clinical benefit with a manageable safety profile in previously treated patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) at 13.4- and 25.4-month median follow-up (Overman MJ, Lonardi S, Wong KYM et al. Durable clinical benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in DNA mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:773-779. Overman MJ, Lonardi S, Wong KYM, et al. Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab in previously treated patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: long-term follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:635). Here, we present results from the 4-year follow-up of these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received nivolumab (3 mg/kg) plus low-dose (1 mg/kg) ipilimumab every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks until disease progression. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR; as per RECIST version 1.1). RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were treated; 76% had ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Median follow-up was 50.9 months (range 46.9-62.7 months). Median duration of therapy was 24.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.8-33.2 months]. Investigator-assessed ORR increased from 55% (95% CI 45% to 64%) at 13.4 months to 65% (95% CI 55% to 73%) at 50.9 months with a disease control rate of 81% (95% CI 72% to 87%). The complete response rate increased from 3% at 13.4 months to 13% at 50.9 months. Partial responses were observed in 52% of patients; 21% had stable disease, and 12% had progressive disease. Median time to response was 2.8 months (range 1.1-37.1 months), and median duration of response was not reached (range 1.4+ to 58.0+ months). At data cut-off, 37 (48%) patients had ongoing responses. Median progression-free survival was not reached [95% CI 38.4 months-not estimable (NE)], and median overall survival was not reached (95% CI NE). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 32% of patients; 13% of patients had any-grade TRAEs leading to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm long-term benefit of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab for previously treated patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. The safety profile was manageable with no new safety signals. ispartof: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY vol:33 issue:10 pages:1052-1060 ispartof: location:England status: published

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) with the Kirsten ras sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in colon cancer.This retrospective study included 195 patients with colon cancer who underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) before surgery between January 2014 and December 2017. All patients underwent KRAS mutation and MSI analyses using surgical specimens of the primary tumor. The associations of SUVmax with KRAS mutation and MSI were analyzed.The SUVmax differed significantly between the microsatellite stable (MSS) and MSI groups (14.5 ± 7.0 vs. 19.1 ± 10.9; P = 0.0249), and between the KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutation groups (14.1 ± 7.6 vs. 17.5 ± 7.9; P = 0.0017).SUVmax obtained using 18F-FDG PET/CT showed significant differences in relation to KRAS mutation and MSI status. 18F-FDG PET/CT could be used as a supplemental modality for assessing KRAS mutations and MSI status in colon cancer.

The identification of mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite unstable (MSI) endometrial cancers (ECs) is important in screening, diagnosis, and therapeutic stratification of patients. We compared the diagnostic performance of 4 MSI molecular tests based on fragment length assay in capillary electrophoresis (OncoMate™ MSI assay, Promega) and in microcapillary electrophoresis (TapeStation 4200, Agilent); with high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis approaches (Idylla™ MSI Test, Biocartis; EasyPGX® ready MSI, Diatech Pharmacogenetics) on a series of 56 ECs, which was well characterized for MMR status with immunohistochemical approach (IHC, nonmolecular reference test). The concordance of fluorescence capillary electrophoresis with IHC (AUC 0.98) was higher respect to the other molecular methodologies. Otherwise, HRM approaches and microcapillary electrophoresis platform failed to detect MSI-ECs showing minimal microsatellite shifts. In conclusion, in colorectal site, several technologies are eligible for MSI test, whereas in ECs, MSI test should be based on fluorescent capillary electrophoresis as it identifies a higher proportion of cases that could be misdiagnosed with other strategies.

In a portion of patients with DNA mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) rectal cancer, clinical complete response (cCR) could be achieved after anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) immunotherapy. However, no data are available concerning the safety of omitting surgery and adopting immunotherapy as a curative-intent treatment for these patients.We retrospectively collected a series of patients with dMMR/MSI-H rectal adenocarcinoma who had cCR after receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and adopted immunotherapy as curative-intent treatment from six institutions. Survival outcomes were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Nineteen patients were included with a median age of 48 (range 19-63). One patient was diagnosed with stage I disease, four with stage II disease and fourteen with stage III disease. Sixteen patients received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy as the first line of therapy, and eleven patients were treated with single-agent anti-PD-1 antibodies. The median time from the start of treatment to cCR was 3.8 (range 0.7-6.5) months. During a median follow-up of 17.1 (range 3.1-33.5) months since achieving cCR, no local or distant relapse was observed. Two-year local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease free-survival and overall survival for the whole cohort were 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively.For patients with dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced rectal cancer who achieved cCR during anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, adopting immunotherapy as curative-intent treatment might be an alternative option. Longer follow-up and larger cohorts are warranted to verify this innovative treatment approach.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) is characterized by hypermutation leading to abundant neoantigens that activate an antitumor immune response in the tumor microenvironment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of this subset of CRC and other solid tumors with dMMR, by producing frequent and durable responses that extend patient survival. Recently, the anti–programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab was shown to produce significantly longer progression-free survival with fewer adverse events compared with chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) with dMMR. Accordingly, single-agent pembrolizumab represents a new standard of care for dMMR mCRCs including patients with Lynch syndrome and the more common sporadic cases. Furthermore, data indicate that the combination of PD-1 and cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 inhibitors was more effective than single-agent PD-1 inhibition in patients with dMMR mCRCs, suggesting nonredundant mechanisms of action. Although the benefit of ICIs is currently limited to metastatic disease, studies evaluating ICIs as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in earlier-stage dMMR CRC are ongoing. Despite success of ICIs in the treatment of metastatic dMMR cancers, an appreciable proportion of these tumors demonstrate intrinsic or acquired resistance, and biomarkers to identify these patients are needed. Advances in the understanding of immunotherapy resistance mechanisms hold promise for both biomarker identification and development of novel strategies to circumvent treatment resistance. In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of the evidence for the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of dMMR CRC, discuss resistance mechanisms, and outline potential strategies to circumvent primary and secondary resistance with the goal of broadening the benefit of ICIs.

Endometrial cancer can be characterized by high instability of microsatellites (MSI-H), a biomarker indicative of sensibility to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The results of the KEYNOTE-158 trial led to the approval of pembrolizumab - a monoclonal, humanized IgG4 kappa anti-PD-1 antibody able to prevent T-cell PD-1/tumor cell PD-L1/2 interaction, thus restoring T-cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity - in MSI-H endometrial cancer relapsing after at least one line of chemotherapy (CT).Ongoing trials, such as KEYNOTE-B21/ENGOT-en11, KEYNOTE-C93/ENGOT-en15/GOG-3064, and NRG/GY018, aim to move this option earlier in the algorithm, whether adjuvant or first-line, even CT-free. Combinatorial approaches associating ICIs with other target therapies blocking immunosuppressive pathways are also being studied.The ICI overall response rates in MSI-H patients are encouraging, but over 50% do not respond to treatment. A more thorough definition of the MSI status regarding specific missing proteins could allow better use of this biomarker and explain why specific populations may not respond to immunotherapy regardless of widely accepted predictive biomarkers. Future developments should focus on identifying who can benefit from a CT-free treatment and translational research on primary resistant MSI-H EC.

Programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors mobilize and activate the anti-tumor activity of the immune system by blocking the inhibitory effects of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway in T cells. Several anti-PD-1 or -PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies have been approved for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. However, most of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are administered via intravenous infusion, which is inconvenient and leads to unsatisfactory patient compliance in the treatment process. Therefore, subcutaneous envafolimab is a potential treatment modality for advanced solid tumors.A phase I clinical trial showed that the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of envafolimab were similar to those of other traditional antibodies. Additionally, clinical findings from a phase II trial revealed that envafolimab monotherapy exhibited satisfactory clinical therapeutic effects and no significant adverse events in patients with microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch Repair (MSI-H/dMMR) solid tumors who failed at least one line of prior systemic therapy.Subcutaneous envafolimab may serve as a more convenient and acceptable treatment modality than those approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for patients with an advanced solid tumor, which may revolutionize the modes of immunotherapy in the future.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors yielded unprecedented outcomes in patients with mismatch repair deficient/ microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but clinical decision-making in this rapidly evolving treatment landscape is challenging. Since performance status (PS) represents a well-established prognostic factor in clinical practice, we investigated whether worse PS, overall or related to either patients' frailty or high tumour burden, could affect the outcomes in this whole patients' population and according to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment type.We conducted a global study at Tertiary Cancer Centres and collected data of patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with anti- programmed-death (ligand)-1 (PD(L)-1) monotherapy or anti-PD-1/anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 combination.The cohort included 502 patients. At a median follow-up of 31.2 months, worse PFS and OS were reported in patients with patient-related PS ≥ 1 (adjusted-HRs: 1.73, 95%CI: 1.06-2.83, p = 0.004 and 2.06, 95%CI: 1.13-3.74, p = 0.001, respectively) and cancer-related PS ≥ 1 (adjusted-HRs: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.19-2.17, p = 0.004 and 1.87, 95%CI: 1.32-2.66, p = 0.001, respectively). Anti-PD-1/anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 combination did not provide significantly better survival compared to anti-PD(L)-1 monotherapy in PS 0 subgroup (PFS HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.37-1.02, p = 0.059; OS HR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.32-1.11, p = 0.100) and in patient-related PS ≥ 1 (PFS HR 0.93, 95%CI: 0.31-2.83, p = 0.899; OS HR 1.22, 95%CI: 0.34-4.37, p = 0.760), but the difference was significant and clinically meaningful in the subgroup with cancer-related PS ≥ 1 (PFS HR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.19-0.53, p lt; 0.001; OS HR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.14-0.48, p lt; 0.001).In patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, an extensive evaluation of clinical variables including PS may be implemented in the therapy decision-making.

Abstract: Immunotherapy can be considered a therapeutic revolution in oncology, with great impact on many tumor types, such as melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. However, in metastatic colorectal cancer, the benefits in terms of prolonged tumor control and high response rate are limited to the rare subgroup of tumors with high mutation burden - mostly tumors that harbor microsatellite instability (MSI) or a deficient mismatch repair system (dMMR), or tumor microsatellite stability and damaging mutations in the exonuclease domains of POLE or POLD. The KEYNOTE-028 uncontrolled phase II trial demonstrated an impressive antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in patients with treatmentrefractory Lynch-associated tumors, including colorectal cancer. Nivolumab with or without ipilimumab confirmed the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with previously treated dMMR / MSI metastatic colorectal cancer. The recent KEYNOTE-177 phase III trial demonstrated that pembrolizumab significantly reduced the relative risk of disease progression or death and improved progression-free survival in patients with treatment-naive dMMR / MSI metastatic colorectal cancer in comparison with first-line chemotherapy with or without biologics. Unfortunately, current pharmacological strategies with immunotherapy have not been successful for most patients with microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer. In this review, we critically appraise the applicability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR/MSI metastatic colorectal cancer. We also discuss the recent negative trials of immunotherapy combinations in microsatellite stable tumors and more mature immunotherapy ongoing studies in the field of advanced colorectal cancer.

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of molecular classification using only comprehensive next-generation sequencing-based techniques and its relationship with survival outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer. Paired tumor-normal sequencing data of 1021 cancer-related genes using tumor tissues or peripheral blood samples and clinical data were retrospectively collected from a cohort of endometrial cancers. The microsatellite instability status was inferred using the MSIsensor (v0.5) with a cut-off of 8%. Sixty patients were classified into four groups: POLEsupMUT/supgroup (13.3%), MSI-H group (20%), TP53supWT/supgroup (45%) and TP53supMUT/supgroup (21.7%). Patients within TP53supMUT/supgroup were more common in serous carcinoma compared to endometrioid carcinoma (P = .0098). TP53WT was significantly correlated with early stage and low grade. TP53supMUT/supgroup was associated with significantly worse DFS compared to MSI-H group and TP53supWT/supgroup (P = .014 and .004, respectively). Comprehensive next-generation sequencing is a reliable and simple method to stratify the prognosis of endometrial carcinoma. It can be potentially used to guide treatment of patients with endometrial cancer in routine practice.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) status is an important prognostic marker for various cancers. Furthermore, because immune checkpoint inhibitors are much more effective in tumors with high level of MSI (MSI-H), MSI status is routinely tested in multiple cancer types. Therefore, many studies have tested the feasibility of deep learning (DL)-based prediction of MSI status from hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained tissue slides. In the present study, we attempted a fully automated classification of MSI status in gastric cancer (GC) tissue slides. For frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) GC tissues from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the areas under the curves (AUCs) for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.893 and 0.902, respectively. The classifier trained with the TCGA FFPE tissues performed well on an external validation Asian FFPE cohort, with an AUC of 0.874. However, the DL-based classifier seems incompatible with cancers from different organs because morphologic features of MSI-H tissues are different. Analysis of histomorphologic features of MSI-H GC tissues suggested that MSI-H GC could largely be divided into two groups: intestinal type tumors with moderate to poor differentiation and diffuse type mucinous tumors. However, the recognizable morphologic features cannot completely explain the good performance of the DL-based classifier. These results indicate that DL could automatically learn the optimal features for discrimination of MSI status in GC tissue slides. This study demonstrated the potential of a DL-based MSI classifier as a screening tool for definitive cases.

RNA-binding Motif Protein39 (RBM39) is identified as a splicing factor and transcription coactivator. Despite mounting evidence that RBM39 plays a critical role in the development of specific malignancies, no systematic pan-cancer investigation of RBM39 has been conducted. As a result, we set out to investigate RBM39's prognostic significance and putative immunological activities in 33 different cancers. Based on TCGA and CCLE, GTEx, cBioportal and HPA, we used a series of bioinformatics approaches to explore the potential oncogenic role of RBM39, including analysis of the expression of the pan-cancer species RBM39, the prognostic relationship between RBM39 expression and overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free interval (PFI), the relationship between RBM39 expression and clinical phenotype, analysis of the relationship between RBM39 expression and tumour mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), DNA methylation and immune cell infiltration. Our results showed that RBM39 is overexpressed in most cancers. RBM39 was positively or negatively correlated with the prognosis of different tumours. RBM39 expression was associated with TMB and MSI in 9 and 12 cancer types. In addition, RBM39 expression was associated with DNA methylation in almost all tumours. There are eight tumours were screened for further study, including BRCA, COAD, HNSC, LIHC, LUSC, SKCM, STAD, UCEC. In the screed tumours, RBM39 was found to be negatively correlated with the infiltration of most immune cells. In addition, the correlation with RBM39 expression varied by immune cell subtype. Based on RBM39's role in tumorigenesis and tumour immunity, we suggest it can serve as a surrogate prognostic marker.

Immunotherapy (IO) agents have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes across many tumor types. There have been great efforts to introduce immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment paradigm of esophagogastric cancers as well. A number of randomized phase III trials, which will be reviewed here, established the role of these agents in both early-stage and advanced-stage disease. Adjuvant nivolumab is US Food and Drug Administration–approved after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and resection of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers on the basis of the phase III CheckMate 577 trial. In the advanced setting, patients with programmed death receptor ligand-1–positive tumors should be recommended IO in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting on the basis of the results from KEYNOTE 590, CheckMate 649, and CheckMate 648. Across trials, chemotherapy continues to play a critical role in the first-line setting and should be offered to all patients who are eligible for systemic therapy, including those with biomarker select tumors. In the later lines of treatment, IO has modest activity, and prior studies have grown largely irrelevant because of the enrollment of IO-naive patients. Similar to other disease types, patients with microsatellite unstable (microsatellite instability high) tumors represent a unique cohort that is more sensitive to IO. However, there are no randomized studies evaluating how best to apply IO in early or advanced stages specifically for the treatment of patients with microsatellite instability high upper GI tumors. Questions remain how to best select patients who benefit from IO treatments, how to augment IO activity in programmed death receptor ligand-1–negative tumors, and how to incorporate IO in late-line settings or for recurrent disease that has been treated with IO-containing regimens during early stages.

Microsatellite instability (MSI), high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are hot biomarkers related to the improvement of immunotherapy response. Two cohorts of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were collected and sequenced via targeted next-generation sequencing. Drug analysis was then performed on the shared genes using three different databases: Drugbank, DEPO and DRUGSURV. A total of 27 common genes were mutated in at least two groups of TMB-H-, MSI- and PD-L1-positive groups. AKT1, SMAD4, SCRIB and AXIN2 were severally involved in PI3K-activated, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β)-activated, Hippo-repressed and Wnt-repressed pathways. This study provides an understanding of the mutated genes related to the immunotherapy biomarkers of NSCLC.

Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) are rare ovarian malignant neoplasms; their etiopathogenetic mechanisms remain largely unelucidated. Lately, defects in mismatch repair (MMR) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of AGCTs. Demonstration of MMR deficiency in these tumors can help identify patients potentially eligible for immune checkpoint inhibition therapy. The present study was done to explore the role of MMR deficiency in the etiopathogenesis of AGCTs.This was a retrospective study conducted on histopathologically confirmed AGCT cases. MMR protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays using an antibody panel of MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2.Of a total of 40 ovarian AGCTs evaluated for MMR deficiency, none demonstrated loss of expression of any of the 4 MMR proteins.The results of our preliminary study show that there is no association between MMR deficiency with AGCT. Nevertheless, larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm or refute this observation.

Background Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved outcomes for patients with microsatellite instability high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors. However, not all MSI-H/dMMR patients will exhibit the same ICB efficacy. Previous studies suggest that concomitant antibiotic use while receiving ICB may result in poorer outcomes. We aimed to evaluate this association in patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Materials and Methods A single-site, retrospective review of 57 patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC that received ICB was completed. Data collected included patient demographics, ICB information, and antibiotic use. Antibiotic exposure was considered from 90 days prior to ICB through 6 weeks after initiation. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Results The majority of patients received pembrolizumab (27 [47%]) or nivolumab (17 [30%]) monotherapy as their ICB agent. Of the 57 patients, 19 (33.3%) had antibiotic exposure from 90 days prior to ICB initiation through 6 weeks after initiation with most (13 [68%]) having antibiotic use in the 30 days preceding ICB initiation. Similar ORRs were seen in both groups (P-value > .99). No difference was observed in OS (P-value .29) or PFS (P-value .36) between groups. Conclusion Our data show no association of lower response rates or survival in those MSI-H/dMMR patients with mCRC who receive antibiotics around the initiation of ICB. This information needs to be confirmed in a larger prospective cohort.

In luminal gastrointestinal tumors, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 have been investigated in multiple settings. The indications for these drugs are primarily dependent on specific biomarkers that imply immunogenicity: overexpression of PD-L1, tumor mutational burden, loss of mismatch repair proteins (dMMR) and/or high microsatellite instability status. Although these markers can be both predictive and prognostic, there is variability in how they are measured and used to guide therapies. Moreover, the use of ICIs can be further refined with a better understanding of the tumor microenvironment and interactions with other available therapies. The purpose of this review is to characterize luminal gastrointestinal tumors' responses to ICIs considering known predictive biomarkers and discuss emerging therapeutic approaches using ICIs.Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are medications that help the natural immune system fight cancer cells, preventing their growth. In tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, mounting research has shown that ICIs are useful in treatment regimens. However, this depends on certain characteristics of individual cancers, such as how many mutations they have, if they are missing certain enzymes and other considerations. ICIs can also be paired with standard – and nonstandard – treatments like chemotherapy, radiation and other targeted therapy to increase their effectiveness against cancer. This article discusses how ICIs are used in gastrointestinal tract cancers according to the available evidence in the medical literature, and it explores the directions of the research on the forefront of immunotherapy.

Objective. To evaluate the significance of PD-1 customization and autoimmune T-cell therapy for advanced colorectal cancer with high MSI expression. Methods. One hundred and eight patients with advanced colorectal cancer with high MSI expression admitted to our hospital between August 2019 and January 2022 were divided into control and study groups, and PD-1 customization and autoimmune T-cell therapy were administered to the two groups, respectively. Trends in immune indexes, PD-1 exposure, and survival rates were studied in both groups. Results. The treatment efficiency of the study group was 90.74%, which was higher than that of the control group (61.11%) P < 0. 05 ; after treatment, the presence of CDl07a, perforin, and GranB cells was significantly higher in both groups compared with that before treatment, but the expression of PD-1 was more pronounced in the study group P < 0. 05 ; that is, the expression of PD-1 in peripheral T lymphocytes in the study group compared with that of the control group was higher in patients with grade III-IV, and peripheral T lymphocytes were also higher in patients with grade III-IV compared with patients with grade I-II P < 0. 05 . Conclusion. PD-1 customization combined with autoimmune T-cell therapy is a novel therapeutic modality that can substantially improve.

Introduction. Immunotherapy is currently the most promising antitumor treatment approach. However, the colon cancer immunotherapy indication dMMR/MSI-H do not cover all colon cancer patients suitable for immunotherapy. We performed transcriptome-wide expression profile analyses of pMMR/MSS colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) specimens from TCGA database to identify a genetype signature associated with tumor immune microenvironment types (TIMTs). Methods. TCGA database was used to identify tumor genotypes suitable for antitumor immunotherapy. We analyzed RNA-sequencing profiles of 338 COAD targeted to the pMMR/MSS group from TCGA public dataset. The ESTIMATE and the CIBERSORT were used to analyze the pMMR/MSS COAD immune microenvironment between APC wild and APC mutation. Furthermore, we further verified the relationship between APC genotype and TIMTs and the efficacy of immunotherapy in 42 colon cancer specimens. Results. We identified that in APC-wt/MSS colon cancer, the expressions of PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4, and CYT (GZMA and PRF1) were increased. The TMB, Immunoscore, and the proportion of CT8+ T cell infiltration also were identified increasing in these patients. And pathway enrichment analysis for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between APC-wt and APC-mt MSS COAD was done to further explore their biological function. Similarly, the significant pathways for DEGs were mainly enriched in the immune response, extracellular matrix, and cell adhesion which involved in immune response. Specimens from 42 colon cancer patients, including 22 APC-mt/MSS and 20 APC-wt/MSS, were immunohistochemically evaluated for expression of CD8 and PD-L1. And APC-wt/MSS tumors showed significantly higher expression of CD8 and PD-L1 than APC-mt/MSS tumor. Moreover, APC-wt was compared with APC-mt MSS/pMMR colon cancer (DOR, 45% and 26.7%, respectively; P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Based on the results, we found that more colon cancers of APC-wt/MSS are classified by TMIT I. And APC-wt/MSS colon cancer patients are more likely to benefit from antitumor immunotherapy.

Background. Alternative splicing (AS) plays a crucial role in regulating the progression of colorectal cancer (CRC), but its distribution remains to be explored. Here, we aim to investigate the genes edited by AS which show differential expression in patients with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI). Materials and Methods. We applied long-read nanopore sequencing to determine the mRNA profiles and screen AS genes using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) method in ten paired CRC tissues. CRC tissue and plasma samples were used to validate the differential genes with AS using real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR, immunohistochemistry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results. ONT sequencing identified 404 genes were downregulated, and 348 genes were upregulated in MSI cancer tissues compared with microsatellite stability (MSS) cancer tissues. In total, 6,200 AS events were identified in 2,728 mRNA transcripts. WGCNA revealed dMMR/MSI-correlated gene modules, including INHBA and RPL22L1, which were upregulated; conversely, HMGCS2 was downregulated in MSI cancer. Overexpression of RPL22L1, INHBA, and CAPZA1 was further confirmed in CRC tissues. INHBA was found to be associated with tumor lymphatic metastasis. Importantly, the levels of INHBA in CRC plasma were significantly increased compared with those in noncancer plasma. INHBA showed a higher level in dMMR/MSI CRC than in MSS CRC, indicating that INHBA is a useful biomarker. Conclusion. Our results showed that ONT-identified genes provide a pool to explore AS-associated markers for dMMR/MSI CRC. We demonstrated INHBA as a promising signature for clinical application in predicting tumor lymphatic metastasis and screening dMMR/MSI candidates.

With the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy researchers have facilitated substantial progress for patients with mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer, which has led to practice changes at a head-spinning pace. However, this benefit has not been translated into microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, which carries the hallmarks of chromosomal instability. So far, clinical trials have not shown any substantial clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, which has been disappointing. Recently, combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and targeted therapies have been investigated for potential synergistic effects that may increase antitumor activity in the tumor microenvironment and achieve more substantial clinical and radiologic responses. In this article, we discuss the current state of the science for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in microsatellite stable colorectal cancers, and we review the molecular underpinnings of inherited physiologic barriers for the delivery of effective immunotherapy. We also elaborate on existing therapeutic opportunities to convert microsatellite stable colorectal cancer into an “immune hot” cancer, which may define the future treatment paradigm of colorectal cancer for which there is a great unmet need.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are shown to be effective among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), with U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for all lines of therapy. In Europe, only pembrolizumab in the first line and the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab beyond the first line are approved. Many questions remain about the clinical management of MSI-H/dMMR CRC. Biomarkers predictive of immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance among MSI-H/dMMR tumors are needed (1) to select the best treatment for patients with CRC (anti–PD-[L]1 monotherapy alone or combined with anti–CTLA-4 or chemotherapy) and (2) to develop new treatment strategies for patients whose disease progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings is also of great interest for patients harboring MSI-H/dMMR, especially as a substantial proportion have Lynch syndrome or are at high risk of developing cancers in their lifetime and sporadic MSI-H/dMMR cancers occur most frequently in elderly and frail patients. Thus, CRC is not one, but two different diseases: (1) MSI-H/dMMR CRC (seen in 5% of mCRC and 15% of non-mCRC), which is genetically unstable with a high mutational load and many neoantigens, and for which immune checkpoint inhibitors radically changed clinical management, and (2) microsatellite stable CRC with chromosomal instability, for which immune checkpoint inhibitors are not proven efficient.

Disparate outcomes exist between Black and White patients with endometrial cancer (EC). One contributing factor is the disproportionately low representation of Black patients in clinical trials and in tumor molecular profiling studies. Our objective was to investigate molecular profiles of ECs in a cohort with a high proportion of tumors from Black patients.A total of 248 EC samples and self-reported race data were collected from 6 institutions. Comprehensive tumor profiling and analyses were performed by Caris Life Sciences.Tumors from 105 (42%) Black and 143 (58%) White patients were included. Serous histology (58% vs 36%) and carcinosarcoma (25% vs 16%), was more common among Black patients, and endometrioid was less common (17% vs 48%) (p0.01). Differences in gene mutations between cohorts corresponded to observed histologic differences between races. Specifically, TP53 mutations were predominant in serous tumors. In endometrioid tumors, mutations in ARID1A were the most common, and high rates of MSI-H, MMRd, and TMB-H were observed. In carcinosarcoma tumors, hormone receptor expression was high in tumors of Black patients (PR 23.4%, ER 30.8%). When stratified by histology, there were no significant differences between tumors from Black and White women.This cohort had a high proportion of tumors from Black women. Distinct molecular profiles were driven primarily by more aggressive histologic subtypes among Black women. Continued effort is needed to include Black women and other populations under-represented in EC molecular profiling studies as targeted therapies and personalized medicine become mainstream.

Gene fusions provide access to new therapeutic opportunities for patients treated for a colorectal cancer (CRC). However, they do not excess 1% of patients. A better identification of patients in whom gene fusions are highly prevalent is a major issue in a therapeutic and medico-economics perspective. This study assesses the rates of gene fusions in CRC patients with MSI/RAS-BRAF

In the KEYNOTE-158 study (NCT02628067), pembrolizumab showed a high objective response rate and durable clinical benefit for patients with previously treated, unresectable/metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair‒deficient (dMMR) non-colorectal solid tumours. We present health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results from the MSI-H/dMMR population (cohort K).Eligible patients had previously treated MSI-H/dMMR advanced non-colorectal solid tumours, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and ECOG performance status ≤1. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for 35 cycles (2 years). The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and EQ-5D-3L were administered at baseline, at regular intervals throughout treatment, and 30 days after treatment discontinuation. Prespecified analyses (exploratory endpoints) included the magnitude of change from baseline to post-baseline timepoints in all patients and by the best overall response for QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL, QLQ-C30 functional/symptom scales/items, and EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (VAS) score.At data cutoff (October 5, 2020), 351 patients were enrolled, of whom 311 and 315 completed baseline QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires, respectively. QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scores improved from baseline to week 9 (mean [95% CI] change, 3.07 [0.19-5.94]), then remained stable or improved by week 111, with greater improvements observed in patients with a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (10.85 [6.36-15.35]). Patients with CR/PR showed improvements in physical (5.58 [1.91-9.25]), role (9.88 [3.80-15.97]), emotional (5.62 [1.56-9.68]), and social (8.33 [2.70-13.97]) functioning, and stable cognitive functioning (1.74 [-1.45 to 4.94]).Pembrolizumab generally improved or preserved HRQoL in patients with previously treated MSI-H/dMMR advanced non-colorectal solid tumours.

Background: In 2017, DNA mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) testing was nationally recommended for advanced colorectal cancers based on favorable immune checkpoint inhibitor responses among patients with MMR-deficient/MSI-high tumors. Methods: Patients ages ≥20-years-old presenting with stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma from 2010 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database. 2017 was the latest year with available testing utilization data. Patient, tumor, socioeconomic, and care setting characteristics were evaluated for association with upfront MMR/MSI testing in 2017 using multivariable logistic regression and average adjusted predicted probabilities (%AAP). Results: Among 72,830 stage IV colorectal cancers, upfront MMR/MSI testing levels increased from 16.4% in 2010 to 56.4% in 2017. For patients diagnosed in 2017 (i.e., following national recommendations, n = 10,022), testing levels were lower for older patients (Padj < 0.001), and were independent of patients' race/ethnicity and insurance status. Patients from the poorest quartile of households received less testing [49.6%AAP, 99.9% confidence interval (CI) 45.5–53.7] than patients from the 3rd (56.9%AAP, 99.9% CI, 53.3–60.6; Padj < 0.001) or 4th quartiles (57.6%AAP, 99.9% CI, 54.3–60.9; Padj < 0.001). Although testing levels improved most at community programs, they remained lower in 2017 (46.6%AAP, 99.9% CI, 41.0–52.1) compared with academic/NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers (62.8%AAP, 99.9% CI, 59.7–65.8; Padj < 0.001). Conclusions: Upfront MMR/MSI testing utilization for patients with advanced colorectal cancer has increased but there is still substantial need for optimization. Testing utilization disproportionately lagged for patients who were older, from the poorest quartile of households, or managed at community cancer programs. Impact: Our findings indicate opportunities for improving rates of MMR/MSI testing and reporting, possibly through incorporation into quality control and accreditation metrics.

It remains unclear whether immunotherapy, which is not generally considered for microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC), can be used to effectively treat select CRC patients. We investigated the feasibility of obesity-associated MSS CRC patients for immunotherapy based on genomic alterations.We evaluated differences in genomic alteration types and immune signatures between obese and non-obese patients with MSS CRC. We performed genomic analyses using 434 CRC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Patients with MSS CRC were stratified into subgroups based on their BMI and numbers of nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants (nsSNVs) and frameshift insertions and deletions (fs INDELs) using machine learning.The obese subgroup showed higher incidences of single nucleotide variants (SNV) and insertions and deletions (INDELs) in comparison with healthy weight patients with MSS CRC. The subgroup, who had higher numbers of nsSNVs and fs INDLEs, exhibited increased immune signatures, increased number of SNV-derived neoantigens, and had up-regulated two immune checkpoint genes in comparison with healthy weight patients with MSS CRC, reflecting interactions between the cancer genome and immune system.This study suggests that immunotherapy may be suitable for some obesity-associated CRC patients.

Purpose. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), and expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have emerged as predictive biomarkers for responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in several cancer types. However, for patients with negative PD-L1 expression, or microsatellite stability (MSS), some cases may experience favorable response to immunotherapy, and there is currently a lack of good relevant predictors. We tried to introduce several peripheral blood markers for predicting treatment outcome and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in PD-L1 negative and MSS patients. Methods. A retrospective study of 142 PD-L1 negative and MSS patients was carried out. The association of peripheral blood markers including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), and other factors with clinicopathological characters and prognosis were assessed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results. Lower level of PNI and poor performance status (ECOG score of 2) was correlated with significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and worse outcome of ICIs. The multivariate analysis revealed that PNI (for OS HR = 0.465 , 95% CI: 0.236–0.916, p = 0.027 ; for PFS HR = 0.493 , 95% CI: 0.251–0.936, p = 0.031 ) and ECOG score (for OS HR = 4.601 , 95% CI: 2.676–7.910, p < 0.001 ; for PFS HR = 2.830 , 95% CI: 1.707–4.691, p < 0.001 ) were independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. NLR was related to the onset of irAEs. Conclusions. Pretreatment level of PNI and NLR, beyond PD-L1 expression and MSS, can improve the predictive accuracy for immunotherapy outcomes and has the potential to expand the candidate pool of patients for treatment with ICIs.

Aim: To compare pembrolizumab with competing interventions for previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer. Method: Trials were identified via a systematic literature review and synthesized using a Bayesian network meta-analysis with time-varying hazard ratios (HRs). Results: Using intention-to-treat data, HRs for overall survival were generally in favor of pembrolizumab but not statistically significant; however, statistical significance was reached versus all comparators by month 16 when accounting for crossover. Estimated HRs for progression-free survival significantly favored pembrolizumab versus all comparators by month 12. Pembrolizumab was also superior to all comparators in terms of grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusion: These analyses suggest that pembrolizumab is a highly efficacious and safe treatment in this population.

Clinicians involved in cancer treatment often utilize somatic tumor sequencing to help tailor chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, somatic tumor sequencing can also identify patients at risk for germline pathogenic variants causing cancer predisposition syndromes like Lynch syndrome. The extent to which clinicians realize this implication of tumor sequencing is currently unclear. We performed a retrospective chart review of Stanford Health Care patients who had somatic variant(s) in the Lynch syndrome genes or microsatellite instability identified on tumor sequencing to determine the proportion of patients who were referred to genetics. Among 6,556 patients who had tumor testing, 90 (1.37%) had findings compatible with Lynch syndrome. Of the 62 patients who had not already seen genetics, 47/62 (75.8%) were not referred to genetics for germline testing. Additionally, 26/47 (55.3%) of these individuals had a tumor type within the Lynch syndrome spectrum. Of the 10 patients who did elect germline testing after tumor sequencing, 3/10 were positive for Lynch syndrome. Our study highlights the need for specific guidelines to inform clinician referral practices on germline follow-up of somatic tumor testing and demonstrates the importance of continued research on the relationship between somatic tumor variants and germline variants to inform such guidelines.

Gastric cancer possesses great histological and molecular diversity, which creates obstacles for rapid and efficient diagnoses. Classic diagnoses either depend on the pathologist's judgment, which relies heavily on subjective experience, or time-consuming molecular assays for subtype diagnosis. Here, we present a deep learning (DL) system to achieve interpretable tumor differentiation grade and microsatellite instability (MSI) recognition in gastric cancer directly using hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining whole-slide images (WSIs). WSIs from 467 patients were divided into three cohorts: the training cohort with 348 annotated WSIs, the testing cohort with 88 annotated WSIs, and the integration testing cohort with 31 original WSIs without tumor contour annotation. First, the DL models comprehensibly achieved tumor differentiation recognition with an F1 values of 0.8615 and 0.8977 for poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA) and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (WDA) classes. Its ability to extract pathological features about the glandular structure formation, which is the key to distinguishing between PDA and WDA, increased the interpretability of the DL models. Second, the DL models achieved MSI status recognition with a patient-level accuracy of 86.36% directly from HE-stained WSIs in the testing cohort. Finally, the integrated end-to-end system achieved patient-level MSI recognition from original HE staining WSIs with an accuracy of 83.87% in the integration testing cohort with no tumor contour annotation. The proposed system, therefore, demonstrated high accuracy and interpretability, which can potentially promote the implementation of artificial intelligence healthcare.

An increased risk of metachronous colorectal cancer is usually associated with microsatellite instability occurring in Lynch syndrome. However, not all patients with metachronous colorectal cancer have microsatellite instability. The density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is an independent predictor of outcome in patients with colorectal cancer, and a fascinating hypothesis is that they can be involved in the onset of metachronous colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to analyze the tumor microenvironment and tumor mutation frequency in sporadic and metachronous colorectal cancer.The clinical and pathological records of a series of consecutive colorectal cancer patients who were operated on from 2015 to 2019 were retrieved for this retrospective study. We defined metachronous colorectal cancer as a second colorectal cancer that appeared at least 1 year after the primary one, and sporadic colorectal cancer as those that did not have a metachronous colorectal cancer. Histology for the infiltration of intratumoral lymphomononuclear cells, immunohistochemistry for MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6, and mutational analysis of BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS were all performed. Sporadic colorectal cancer and metachronous colorectal cancer were compared. Nonparametric tests were used for small sample size comparison.In the study, 238 patients were operated on for colorectal cancer at the General Surgery Unit of the Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova from 2015 to 2019. We identified 26 patients with metachronous colorectal cancer, and only 3 of them had had adjuvant therapy after the primary colorectal cancer. No difference was observed in terms of cancer stage between metachronous and sporadic colorectal cancer. Mismatch repair gene deficiencies and microsatellite instability frequency was similar in metachronous colorectal cancer and in sporadic colorectal cancer (P = .77). Likewise, the mutation frequency of BRAF and KRAs was similar in the 2 groups (P = .75 and P = .21, respectively). To the contrary, the absence of infiltration of lymphomononuclear cells within the tumor (P = .004) in patients with metachronous colorectal cancer was more frequent and they tended to have a higher frequency of NRAS mutation (P = .06).Our study showed that, rather unexpectedly, microsatellite instability frequency was similar in metachronous and sporadic colorectal cancer. Moreover, our data suggest that an altered immune microenvironment may be a crucial factor, permitting the occurrence of metachronous colorectal cancer. In fact, the absence of lymphomononuclear cells can be the substrate for a weak immune response to cancer neoantigens, opening the way to a second primary colorectal cancer.

In recent years, studies on the molecular typing of colorectal cancer have matured, and the V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway has been shown to be an important effector molecule of this pathway and regulates the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer. Clinical observations indicate that colorectal cancer patients harboring the BRAF V600E mutation have a worse prognosis than BRAF wild type patients. Several resistance mechanisms have been identified that have led to the development of different treatment strategies, which have shown encouraging activity in early clinical trials. Therefore, a reasonable combination of targeted therapies is expected to further enhance the efficacy of selective BRAF inhibitors. Moreover, some CRC patients with high microsatellite instability or a mismatch repair deficiency seem to be susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors with objective and sustained clinical responses, providing new opportunities for patients with advanced disease. This article primarily explores 3 aspects of the treatment strategies for advanced BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer; chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy.

As the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating a variety of cancer types has increased in recent years, so too have the number of reports on patients acquiring resistance to these therapies. Overcoming acquired resistance to immunotherapy remains an important need in the field of immuno-oncology. Herein, we present a case that suggests sequential administration of combination immunotherapy may be beneficial to advanced cervical cancer patients exhibiting acquired resistance to mono-immunotherapy. The patient’s tumor is microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), which is an important biomarker in predicting ICI response. Results from recent interim prospective studies using combination immunotherapy (eg, nivolumab and ipilimumab) with anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor following progression on anti-PD-1 inhibitors (eg, nivolumab) have shown anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced melanoma and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We also introduce retrospective studies and case reports/case series of dual checkpoint inhibition with anti-PD-1 inhibitor plus anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor after progression on prior anti-PD/PD-L1 monotherapy. To date, there has been no prospective study on the use of combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy at the time of progression on anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with MSI-H tumors or advanced cervical cancer. In this report, we provide evidence that supports future investigations into such treatments.

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRs) are frequently altered in colorectal cancer (CRC) and can be used as prognostic factors. OBJECTIVE: To confirm in stage III CRC patients a reported miR signature that was associated to the presence of metastatic disease. To correlate miR expression with microsatellite instability (MSI) and mutations in RAS and BRAF. METHODS: miR-21, miR-135a, miR-206, miR-335 and miR-Let-7a expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR in 150 patients out of the 329 patients used to analyze MSI and RAS and BRAF mutations. Association with disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed. Data was confirmed by a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: MiR-21 high expression (p= 0.034) and miR-335 low expression (p= 0.0061) were significantly associated with MSI-H. A positive trend (p= 0.0624) between miR-135a high expression and RAS mutations was found. Lower miR-21 expression levels are associated with DFS (HR = 2.654, 95% CI: 1.066–6.605, p= 0.036) and a trend with OS (HR = 2.419, 95% CI: 0.749–7.815, p= 0.140). MiR-21 high expression significantly improves DFS of the poor prognosis group (T4 or N2) (p= 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Association of increased expression of miR-21 and better prognosis in the poor prognostic group may be of interest and could be explored in future prospective clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) and target mRNAs are associated with different frequencies of microsatellite instability. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to elucidate the profiles of miRNAs and target mRNAs expression and their associations with the phenotypic hallmarks of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancers (CRC) by integrating transcriptomic, immunophenotype, methylation, mutation, and survival data. METHODS: Differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRNAs) and mRNAs (DEmRNAs) were screened out and then the miRNA-mRNA regulatory pairs were identified through two databases. We verified that the expression levels were detected in 40 microsatellite instable (MSI) and 40 microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC samples and used the logistic regression and the Cox regression method to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of negative regulatory pairs respectively. RESULTS: The best diagnostic model that combines miR-31-5p, PLAGL2, miR-361-5p, and RAB27B, which were associated with immune microenvironment, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and overall DNA methylation, could significantly predict microsatellite instability in colon tissues. MiR-31-5p and RAB27B could also predict the overall survival of MSS CRCs. CONCLUSION: This study generated a predictive model of the combination of miRNAs and mRNAs to distinguish MSI versus MSS CRCs and elaborated their potential molecular mechanisms and biological functions.

Purpose In endometrial cancer, the incidence of mutations in mismatch repair genes (MMR) is estimated at 17–30%. Patients with alterations at this level (MSI) are known to have different clinical and anatomopathological characteristics than those without this genetic alteration (MSS). In this study, we aim to identify the MSI phenotype in patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. We assessed the correlation of this phenotype with anatomoclinical parameters such as obesity and histological subtype. Methods/patients Clinical and anatomopathological data were collected from 147 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and an immunohistochemical study of MMR system proteins was performed. PMS2 and MSH6 proteins were evaluated as primary screening and subsequent evaluation of MLH1 and MSH6, respectively, if the former were negative. Statistical association between the anatomopathological data and the immunohistochemical result was analyzed. Results and conclusions 22.4% of our patients were MSI phenotype. We obtained statistically significant differences by multivariate analysis between endometrioid subtype and higher FIGO classification grade with MSI phenotype and obesity with MSS phenotype. Given these statistical results, we propose a function for predicting the probability of being MSI phenotype taking into account the histological subtype (endometrioid/non-endometrioid carcinoma) and FIGO grade as well as obesity. This prediction may be useful prior to hysterectomy, for genetic study of the MLH1 promoter and subsequent genetic counseling.