Search

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-ann-10.1177_00027162211055409 for Immigration and the Future of the Welfare State in Europe by Alberto Alesina, Johann Harnoss and Hillel Rapoport in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-ann-10.1177_00027162211061259 for Forecasting under Uncertainty: How Network Composition Shapes Future-Oriented Cognition by Ilka Vari-Lavoisier in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-ann-10.1177_00027162211055409 for Immigration and the Future of the Welfare State in Europe by Alberto Alesina, Johann Harnoss and Hillel Rapoport in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-ann-10.1177_00027162211055409 for Immigration and the Future of the Welfare State in Europe by Alberto Alesina, Johann Harnoss and Hillel Rapoport in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-ann-10.1177_00027162211058389 for The Anxiety of Political Uncertainty: Insights from the Brexit Vote by Isabel Ruiz and Carlos Vargas-Silva in The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

This article was presented at a conference organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in April 2005, "Urban Dynamics in New York City." The goal of the conference was threefold: to examine the historical transformations of the engine-of-growth industries in New York and distill the main determinants of the city's historical dominance as well as the challenges to its continued success; to study the nature and evolution of immigration flows into New York; and to analyze recent trends in a range of socioeconomic outcomes, both for the general population and recent immigrants more specifically.

International audience; The preceding article by Lamont, Beljean and Clair (LBC) entitled ‘What is Missing? Cultural Processes and Causal Pathways to Inequality’ invites us to extend our socio-economic imagination regarding inequality. While much economic and social inequality is structural in nature, LBC discuss how the human experience of inequalities is strongly grounded in cultural process. Cultural processes here include both identification and rationalization, which LBC discuss in relation to four processes: racialization and stigmatization (for identification) and standardization and evaluation (for rationalization). While cultural processes are the contested terrain within which inequalities are shaped and played out, LBC argue why scholars should pay stronger attention to them than in previous research. Socio-Economic Review invited a group of leading scholars in the fields of inequality and cultural process to discuss the paper of LBC, and relate this both to their past work and the future of inequality research. Douglas Massey opens with a reflection on why US sociology in particular has neglected the role of culture in the study of inequality. The next two contributions by Leslie McCall and co-authors Donald Tomaskovic-Devey and Dustin Avent-Holt raise important questions about how the cultural processes described by LBC relate to the analysis of social structures, such as political discourses or the meso-level dynamics of organizations. Finally, Monin, Forgues and Wang look at how cultural processes operate in organizational settings, and use these insights to analyse the boundary conditions thereof.