1. Do communicators take over? Mediatization and conflicts in civil society
- Author
-
Joanna Mellquist
- Subjects
Sweden ,policy professionals ,Sociology and Political Science ,experts ,organizational logics ,Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology) ,strategic political communication ,public administration ,CSOs ,policy advocacy ,Latvia ,Europe ,symbolic capital ,policy networks ,Political Science and International Relations ,civil society organizations ,Sociologi (exklusive socialt arbete, socialpsykologi och socialantropologi) ,communicators ,civil society ,mediatization ,Netherlands - Abstract
The article investigates internal strategies and struggles in civil society organizations' (CSOs') policy advocacy work from the vantage point of policy professionals by using the concepts of field, symbolic capital, and logics. A main claim is that mediatization acts as a strategic-tension mechanism within a CSO, putting communicators at the center of policy units, which in turn is consequential for the strategies chosen for the organization's policy work. In this way, mediatization as a process celebrates certain professionals and strategies as particularly relevant, creating frustration among employees not specializing in communication. The study identifies a trend for organizations to put more resources and influence into communication and less into actual policy analysis. This article combines research on organizational logics, policy professionals, and mediatization by drawing on 38 interviews with, and ethnographic work among, policy professionals in Sweden, Latvia, and the Netherlands. As manuscript in dissertation with title: Do communicators take over? Mediatization and conflicts in civil society organizations
- Published
- 2023