Search

Purpose To estimate the interobserver agreement of the Carimas software package (SP) on global, regional, and segmental levels for the most widely used myocardial perfusion PET tracer—Rb-82. Materials and methods Rest and stress Rb-82 PET scans of 48 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) were analyzed in four centers using the Carimas SP. We considered values to agree if they simultaneously had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.75 and a difference Results The median values on the segmental level were 1.08 mL/min/g for rest myocardial blood flow (MBF), 2.24 mL/min/g for stress MBF, and 2.17 for myocardial flow reserve (MFR). For the rest MBF and MFR, all the values at all the levels fulfilled were in excellent agreement. For stress MBF, at the global and regional levels, all the 24 comparisons showed excellent agreement. Only 1 out of 102 segmental comparisons (seg. 14) was over the adequate agreement limit—23.5% of the median value (ICC = 0.95). Conclusion Interobserver agreement for Rb-82 PET myocardial perfusion quantification analyzed with Carimas is good at any LV segmentation level—global, regional, and segmental. It is good for all the estimates—rest MBF, stress MBF, and MFR.

First-pass perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) allows the quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow (MBF). However, flow estimates are sensitive to the delay between the arterial and myocardial tissue tracer arrival time (tOnset) and the accurate estimation of MBF relies on the precise identification of tOnset. The aim of this study is to assess the sensitivity of the quantification process to tOnset at voxel level. Perfusion data were obtained from series of simulated data, a hardware perfusion phantom, and patients. Fermi deconvolution has been used for analysis. A novel algorithm, based on sequential deconvolution, which minimizes the error between myocardial curves and fitted curves obtained after deconvolution, has been used to identify the optimal tOnset for each region. Voxel-wise analysis showed to be more sensitive to tOnset compared to segmental analysis. The automated detection of the tOnset allowed a net improvement of the accuracy of MBF quantification and in patients the identification of perfusion abnormalities in territories that were missed when a constant user-selected tOnset was used. Our results indicate that high-resolution MBF quantification should be performed with optimized tOnset values at voxel level.

Purpose High-resolution myocardial perfusion analysis allows for preserving spatial information with excellent sensitivity for subendocardial ischemia detection. However, it suffers from low signal-to-noise ratio. Commonly, spatial averaging is used to increase signal-to-noise ratio. This bears the risk of losing information about the extent, localization and transmurality of ischemia. This study investigates spatial-averaging effects on perfusion-estimates accuracy. Methods Perfusion data were obtained from patients and healthy volunteers. Spatial averaging was performed on voxel-based data in transmural and angular direction to reduce resolution to 50, 20, and 10% of its original value. Fit quality assessment method is used to measure the fraction of modeled information and remaining unmodeled information in the residuals. Results Fraction of modeled information decreased in patients as resolution reduced. This decrease was more evident for Fermi and exponential in transmural direction. Fermi and exponential showed significant difference at 50% resolution (Fermi P < 0.001, exponential P =0.0014). No significant differences were observed for autoregressive-moving-average model (P = 0.081). At full resolution, autoregressive-moving-average model has the lowest fraction of residual information (0.3). Differences were observed comparing ischemic regions perfusion-estimates coefficient of variation at transmural and angular direction. Conclusion Angular averaging preserves more information compared to transmural averaging. Reducing resolution level below 50% at transmural and 20% at angular direction results in losing information about transmural perfusion differences. Maximum voxel size of 2 × 2 mm2 is necessary to avoid loss of physiological information due to spatial averaging. Magn Reson Med 73:1623–1631, 2015. © 2014 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society of Medicine in Resonance.