Search

The recently published WHO Classification of Tumours, Central Nervous System Tumours, Fifth Edition (WHO CNS-5) introduces substantial clinically relevant changes based on improved understanding of the molecular underpinnings of brain tumor types as biological entities. This review highlights pertinent changes for practicing neurologists.Diffuse gliomas are now divided into adult and pediatric types. Adult types are greatly simplified, being classified into three groups based on IDH and 1p/19q status, with molecular grading criteria now included. Pediatric types are divided into low-grade or high-grade and further classified based on molecular features corresponding to clinical behavior. While still recognizing previous morphological subtypes, meningioma is now a single tumor type, with greatly advanced correlations between molecular alterations, locations, morphologic subtypes, and grades. For the first time, ependymomas are classified based on integration of anatomical location, histopathology, and molecular alterations. Importantly, WHO CNS-5 includes a number of new tumor types that have similar clinicopathologic features and are grouped together by their distinctive molecular characteristics.The classification of CNS tumors according to objective, reproducible molecular genetic alterations, provides greater opportunity for neurologists to offer individualized treatment options, enroll homogenous patient populations into clinical trials, and ultimately discover novel therapeutics.

The objective of this study was to determine by a conjoint analysis the preferences for a range of disease-modifying treatment attributes in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and treating neurologists.This was a cross-sectional study throughout Argentina between August 2020 and February 2021. Participating patients were adults with relapsing-remitting MS, who had received a long-term specific disease-modifying treatment for at least the past 3 months and their treating neurologist. Patients and neurologist were sampled from the Argentinean MS patient registry (RelevarEM). We applied the methodology of conjoint analysis. Patient preferences for hypothetical treatment were collected from the overall sample and from stratified subgroups according to the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score. An ordinary least squares regression model was used to estimate parameters.A total of 275 patients from 25 centers (31 principal investigators) were included, mean age was 43.2 ± 10.9 years, 59.6% were female, and mean EDSS was 3.1 ± 2. For the entire sample, we observed that patients had higher preferences for treatments with lower side effect risks (28.7 relative preference [RP]), lower frequency of administration (21.4 RP), and higher impact on relapses (19.6 RP). Patients with a higher EDSS give significantly greater importance to a less frequent administration regime and the oral route than patients with a lower EDSS (23.5 RP vs 20.1 [P =.02] and 17.1 vs 15.3 [P =.03], respectively). For neurologists, the most important attribute was to prevent disease progression (RP 29.3).Our study contributes to the understanding of treatment selection preferences from the perspectives of both patient and neurologists.

Background Hospital on-call neurology shifts are frequently on-site, but some on-call services may be off-site or mixed. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is one of the main reperfusion treatments for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). This study assesses door-to-needle times (DNT) when the neurologist is on-site or off-site. Methods We performed a prospective, observational study from 2012 to 2017, including patients with AIS and treated with tPA. Data were collected on sex, age, door-to-scan time, scan-to-needle time, and DNT. The on-duty neurologist was on-site from 08:00 to 20:00, and on call but off-site from 20:00 to 8:00. Three groups were formed: on-site, off-site, and off-site with resident present. Results Our sample included 138 patients. The mean age was 69.7 years, and 45.7% of patients were women. Ninety-six patients were admitted during the on-site shift, 25 during the off-site shift, and 17 during the off-site–resident present shift. Patients admitted during the on-site and off-site shifts presented DNTs of 59 and 72 minutes, respectively (P = .003). DNTs were 59, 74, and 68 minutes (P = .001), respectively, for the on-site, off-site, and off-site–resident present shifts; the difference between DNTs for on-site and off-site shifts was statistically significant. No differences were observed between DNTs according to time of day (morning, afternoon, or night), or between weekdays and weekends. Conclusion DNT is influenced by whether the on-duty neurologist is on- or off-site at the time of code stroke activation. The presence of a neurology resident can reduce DNT.

Because resources are limited in modern health care systems, the decision on the allocation of expensive drugs can be supported by a public consent. This study examines how various factors influence subjectively perceived "fair" pricing of antiseizure medication (ASM) among four groups including physicians, persons with epilepsy (PWEs), their relatives, and a control group.We conducted a factorial survey. Vignettes featured a fictional PWE receiving a fictional ASM. The characteristics of the fictional PWE, ASM, and epilepsy varied. Participants were asked to assess the subjectively appropriate annual cost of ASM treatment per year for each scenario.Fifty-seven PWEs (mean age (SD) 37.7 ± 12.3, 45.6% female), 44 relatives (age 48.4 ± 15.7, 51.1% female), 46 neurologists (age 37.1 ± 9.6, 65.2% female), and 47 persons in the control group (age 31.2 ± 11.2, 68.1% female) completed the questionnaire. The amount of money that respondents were willing to spend for ASM treatment was higher than currently needed in Germany and increased with disease severity among all groups. All groups except for PWEs accepted higher costs of a drug with better seizure control. Physicians and the control group, but not PWEs and their relatives, tended to do so also for minor or no side effects. Physicians reduced the costs for unemployed patients and the control group spent less money for older patients.ASM effectiveness appears to justify higher costs. However, the control group attributed less money to older PWEs and physicians allocated fewer drug costs to unemployed PWEs.

This study aimed to describe the characteristics of pediatric neurologists (PNs) in Latin America (LA) who attend to children and adolescents with epilepsy and convey to them the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).Personal data and details of discussion of SUDEP with families, including relevance of SUDEP disclosure, frequency of such communication, perceived benefits and risks of disclosure, extent of training received on such disclosure, and professional experience with SUDEP, were collected through an online survey of PNs from LA. Their personal experience in carrying out this conversation was obtained through responses to an open question, further used to identify the main barriers.Of the 442 surveys received, 367 (83%) were analyzed. Most participants (73.8%) responded that the communication of SUDEP risk was relevant or very relevant; however, only 17.9% reported communicating it always or very frequently. Factors that increased the frequency of SUDEP communication included patients with higher levels of complexity (OR = 2.18, P = .003) and the physician's personal experience with SUDEP (OR = 2.305, P .001). Direct questions from the family and avoiding scaring them about a rare outcome were the main motivations behind discussing and not discussing SUDEP, respectively. In the open question, respondents identified worries about the patient's ability to understand the information and cultural gaps as barriers. "Informing with the intention of improving adherence to treatment" and "establishing an empathic relationship" were significantly related. Further, the concept of "do not scare" was significantly related to "personal difficulties in discussing SUDEP."Although most PNs agree that communication about SUDEP is relevant, only a minority actually engages in it. Participants identified a lack of appropriate training in such communication as a barrier. A better understanding of communication expectations, education of health professionals, and communication techniques have a strong relevance in diminishing the gap between guidelines and practice.

Background and purpose: Brain health is essential for health, well-being, productivity and creativity across the entire life. Its definition goes beyond the absence of disease embracing all cognitive, emotional, behavioural and social functions which are necessary to cope with life situations. Methods: The European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Brain Health Strategy responds to the high and increasing burden of neurological disorders. It aims to develop a non-disease-, non-age-centred holistic and positive approach (‘one brain, one life, one approach’) to prevent neurological disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, stroke, epilepsy, headache/migraine, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, sleep disorders, brain cancer) but also to preserve brain health and promote recovery after brain damage. Results: The pillars of the EAN Brain Health Strategy are (1) to contribute to a global and international brain health approach (together with national and subspecialty societies, other medical societies, the World Health Organization, the World Federation of Neurology, patients' organizations, industry and other stakeholders); (2) to support the 47 European national neurological societies, healthcare and policymakers in the implementation of integrated and people-centred campaigns; (3) to foster research (e.g., on prevention of neurological disorders, determinants and assessments of brain health); (4) to promote education of students, neurologists, general practitioners, other medical specialists and health professionals, patients, caregivers and the general public; (5) to raise public awareness of neurological disorders and brain health. Conclusions: By adopting this ‘one brain, one life, one approach’ strategy in cooperation with partner societies, international organizations and policymakers, a significant number of neurological disorders may be prevented whilst the overall well-being of individuals is enhanced by maintaining brain health through the life course.

>Objective: To ascertain the prevalence of culturally native Spanish-speaking child neurologists in the United States. Methods: Prevalence statistics regarding demographic and work profile were applied to data obtained from a cross-sectional electronic survey of Child Neurology Society (CNS) members. Results: Demographics of the 135 respondents were comparable to a similar CNS survey except for ethnicity as shown in Table 1 . Fifty- three percent were male and 24% were over age 60. Approximately a quarter were represented each from East, South, Midwest, and Western US. 42% self-identified as Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino. 62% spoke English as their primary language and 39% spoke Spanish as their primary language. Two-thirds graduated from a US medical school, 51% practice general neurology, and epilepsy was the most common subspecialty (18%). Two-thirds of respondents practice at a major teaching hospital, and 93% hold university academic appointments. 79% are AAN members. 76% did not have medical student debt at the time of the survey. 29% report signs consistent with burnout. 87% would choose Child Neurology again and 96% would recommend Child Neurology to a medical student. Conclusion: 40% of survey respondents self-identified as Hispanic, Latino or Spanish and spoke Spanish as the primary language and the majority practice in Academic Medicine. Nearly a third of those in the current survey identify burnout symptoms. Consideration of distinctive language and cultural characteristics across the US may lead to provision of a more patient-centered and equitable care.

Background We performed a secondary exploratory cluster analysis on the data collected from the validation phase of the study leading to the development of the model care pathway (CP) for Myasthenia Gravis (MG), in which a panel of 85 international experts were asked some characteristics about themselves and their opinion about the model CP. Our aim was to identify which characteristics of the experts play a role in the genesis of their opinion. Methods We extracted the questions probing an opinion and those describing a characteristic of the expert from the original questionnaire. We performed a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and a subsequent hierarchical clustering on principal component (HCPC) on the opinion variables, integrating the characteristic variables as supplementary (predicted). Results After reducing the dimensionality of the questionnaire to three dimensions we noticed that the not-appropriateness judgement of the clinical activities may overlap with the completeness one. From the HCPC it seems that the working setting of the expert may play a crucial role in determining the opinion about the setting of the sub-processes of MG: shifting from a cluster where the experts do not work in sub-specialist settings to one where the experts are working in them, the opinion changes accordingly from a mono-disciplinary setting to a multi-disciplinary one. Another interesting result is that the experience in neuromuscular diseases (NMD) measured in years and the expert typology (whether general neurologist or NMD expert) seem not to contribute significantly to the opinions. Conclusions These findings might indicate a poor ability of the expert to discriminate what is not appropriate from what is not complete. Also, the opinion of the expert might be influenced by the working setting, but not by the experience in NMD (as measured in years).

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogenous group of treatable myopathies. Patients present mainly to the rheumatologist and neurologists, complaining of acute or subacute onset of proximal weakness. Extramuscular manifestations may occur, including involvement of the lungs, skin, and joints. Classically, the diagnosis used to be made based on the creatine kinase level increase, abnormalities in electroneuromyography and presence of inflammatory infiltrates in the muscle biopsy. Recently, the importance of autoantibodies has increased, and now they may be identified in more than half of IIM patients. The continuous clinicoseropathological improvement in IIM knowledge has changed the way we see these patients and how we classify them. In the past, only polymyositis, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myopathy were described. Currently, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, overlap myositis and antisynthetase syndrome have been considered the most common forms of IIM in clinical practice, increasing the spectrum of classification. Patients previously considered to have polymyositis, in fact have these other forms of seropositive IIM. In this article, we reviewed the new concepts of classification, a practical way to make the diagnosis and how to plan the treatment of patients suffering from IIM. RESUMO As miopatias inflamatórias idiopáticas (MII) são um grupo heterogêneo de miopatias tratáveis. Os pacientes procuram principalmente o reumatologista e o neurologista, queixando-se de início agudo ou subagudo de fraqueza proximal. Manifestações extramusculares podem ocorrer, incluindo envolvimento dos pulmões, pele e articulações. Classicamente, o diagnóstico era feito com base na elevação dos níveis de creatina quinase, anormalidades na eletroneuromiografia e presença de infiltrados inflamatórios na biópsia muscular. Recentemente, a importância dos autoanticorpos aumentou, e agora eles podem ser identificados em mais da metade dos pacientes com MII. A contínua melhora clínico-soropatológica no conhecimento do MII mudou a forma como vemos esses pacientes e como os classificamos. No passado, apenas polimiosite, dermatomiosite e miopatia por corpos de inclusão eram descritas. Atualmente, a miopatia necrosante imunomediada, a miosite de sobreposição e a síndrome antissintetase têm sido consideradas as formas mais comuns de MII na prática clínica, aumentando o espectro de classificação. Pacientes previamente considerados como portadores de polimiosite, na verdade, têm uma dessas outras formas de MII soropositivas. Neste artigo, revisamos os novos conceitos de classificação, uma forma prática de fazer o diagnóstico e como planejar o tratamento de pacientes que sofrem de MII.

The concept of "autoimmune epilepsy" (AE) has been emphasized more frequently through the recent increase in recognition of various autoantibodies specific to neuronal proteins.To evaluate the attitudes of neurologists in regard to AE, to review the differential diagnosis, treatment options, and to reveal the effect of COVID-19 on this matter.A detailed questionnaire prepared for AE was sent to neurologists via social media and WhatsApp after the approval of the Ethics Committee. The responses of 245 respondents working in different settings were analyzed, and the group with 15 years or less experience in neurology was statistically compared to the group with more than 15 years of experience.Awareness and knowledge levels on AE seemed high in all groups, while 11% had never thought about AE during the differential diagnosis in real life. Before starting treatment, 20% thought that the autoantibody result should definitely support it, and 77.6% reported that they did not recognize AE well. Participants stated that satisfactory guidelines for diagnosis and treatment (88.2%) and widespread laboratory support (83.7%) were lacking. Neurologists with less experience and those working outside of training hospitals get more often consultation from an experienced clinician while diagnosing and conduct more detailed investigations at the diagnosis stage (p = 0.0025, p = 0.0001).This first survey study conducted in a large group of neurologists on the attitudes for the concept of AE suggested that postgraduate education, and diagnostic and treatment guidelines should be organized and antibody screening tests need to be better disseminated.

Guillain-Barre Syndrome, (GBS), is a popular eponym that comes from a paper written in 1916 by Doctors. Guillain, Barre, and Strohl. Its spectrum has been enlarged considerably since the first description of it. Jean Alexandre Barre was a French neurologist, whose name is still widely associated with that of Georges Guillain, (1876-1961). He is also known for the leg manoeuvre. As Joseph Babinski's brilliant student, (1857-1932), we wanted to briefly retrace his biography in order to highlight some of the salient points within it and subjects that are topical for young neurologists today.

The accelerating integration of telehealth technologies in neurology practice has transformed traditional interactions between neurologists and patients, allied clinicians and society. Despite the immense promise of these technologies to improve systems of neurological care, the infusion of telehealth technologies into neurology practice introduces a host of unique ethical challenges. Proactive consideration of the ethical dimensions of teleneurology and of the impact of these innovations on the field of neurology more generally can help to ensure responsible development and deployment across stages of implementation. Toward these ends, this article explores key ethical dimensions of teleneurology practice and policy, presents a normative framework for their consideration, and calls attention to underexplored questions ripe for further study at this evolving nexus of teleneurology and neuroethics. To promote successful and ethically resilient development of teleneurology across diverse contexts, clinicians, organizational leaders, and information technology specialists should work closely with neuroethicists with the common goal of identifying and rigorously assessing the trajectories and potential limits of teleneurology systems.

Internet-connected devices, including personal computers, smartphones, smartwatches, and voice assistants, have evolved into powerful multisensor technologies that billions of people interact with daily to connect with friends and colleagues, access and share information, purchase goods, play games, and navigate their environment. Digital phenotyping taps into the data streams captured by these devices to characterize and understand health and disease. The purpose of this article is to summarize opportunities for digital phenotyping in neurology, review studies using everyday technologies to obtain motor and cognitive information, and provide a perspective on how neurologists can embrace and accelerate progress in this emerging field.

This report describes a neurologist who, at age 55, developed an irrepressible urge to rhyme after a series of strokes and seizures. His strokes included a right posterior cerebellar infarction and a right thalamic lacune. His subsequent seizures were focal-onset with and without impaired awareness or secondary generalization, which emanated from the left frontotemporal region. On recovery and control of his seizures, he described the emergence of an irresistible urge to rhyme, even in thought and daily speech. His focus on rhyming first manifest as a new affinity for poetry and grew and mutated to a focus on rap music. By age 63 his interest in rap had led him to participate in freestyle rap at an inner-city center for rap improvisation and performance. The potential source for his acquired rhyming and rapping are discussed in terms of his unique insights as a neurologist and the current literature on the brain and rhyme. This patient’s rhyming and rapping may have been initially facilitated by epileptiform activation of word sound associations in the left frontotemporal language areas and possibly perpetuated interictally as a compensation for impaired cerebellar effects on timed anticipation.

Background- Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is an important concern in patients with epilepsy who are otherwise healthy. Current knowledge of SUDEP and attitudes of neurologists in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) towards discussing SUDEP with their patients remain unknown. Objective- We aimed at assessing knowledge, attitudes and factors affecting SUDEP discussion practices of neurologists practicing in the EMR. Methodology- An electronic and paper-based survey was sent to 350 neurologists practicing in the EMR. They were questioned about the frequency, timing, and factors affecting their willingness to initiate SUDEP discussion. We also included questions about perceived patient reactions towards SUDEP discussions and neurologists' preferred way to provide SUDEP information to their patients. Results- We received 132 responses from the 350 surveys sent out (response rate 37.7%). Our results showed that only 1.5% of the neurologists discussed SUDEP with “most” of their patients and their caregivers while 55.3% “rarely” or “never” discussed it. Factors such as additional epilepsy training and more years of clinical experience did not significantly affect the frequency of SUDEP discussion (p= 0.329, p= 0.728). A significant negative association between the number of patients seen per year and the frequency of SUDEP discussion was seen (P = 0.046). Based on their selection of known risk factors, 81% of neurologists were considered as having insufficient knowledge of SUDEP. The top three perceived reactions by the neurologists on SUDEP discussion were distress (74.2%), anxiety (70.5%) and depression (65.9%). Most neurologists initiated SUDEP discussion by themselves and preferred brochures/pamphlets, websites and training sessions to provide SUDEP information. Conclusion- Neurologists in the EMR rarely discuss SUDEP, and have limited knowledge about its risk factors. Upon discussing SUDEP, they overwhelmingly receive negative reactions but not always. Based on our findings, we believe an unintended knowledge gap exists on part of the neurologists. This, coupled with a lack of trained epilepsy nurses and patient education material in regional languages can also be attributed to poor SUDEP discussion practices in the EMR.

COVID-19 has made providing in-person care difficult. In most countries, including Hungary, telemedicine has partly served as a resolution for this issue. Our purpose was to explore the effects of COVID-19 on neurological care, the knowledge of neurology specialists on telemedicine, and the present state of telecare in Hungary, with a special focus on Parkinson's disease (PD).Between July and October 2021, a nationwide online survey was conducted among actively practicing Hungarian neurology specialists who were managing patients with PD.A total of 104 neurologists were surveyed. All levels of care were evaluated in both publicly funded and private healthcare. Both time weekly spent on outpatient specialty consultation and the number of patients with PD seen weekly significantly decreased in public healthcare, while remained almost unchanged in private care (p0.001); higher portion of patients were able to receive in-person care in private care (78.8% vs. 90.8%, p0.001). In telecare, prescribing medicines has already been performed by the most (n=103, 99%). Electronic messages were the most widely known telemedicine tools (n=98, 94.2%), while phone call has already been used by most neurologists (n=95, 91.3%). Video-based consultation has been more widely used in private than public care (30.1% vs. 15.5%, p=0.001). Teleprocedures were considered most suitable for monitoring progression and symptoms of Parkinson's disease and evaluating the need for adjustments to antiparkinsonian pharmacotherapy.COVID-19 has had a major impact on the care of patients with PD in Hungary. Telemedicine has mitigated these detrimental effects; however, further developments could make it an even more reliable component of care.A Covid-19-világjárvány jelentősen nehezíti a személyes betegellátást. A legtöbb országban, köztük Magyarországon is, a telemedicina részben meg­oldást jelent ezen problémára. A Covid-19 neurológiai betegellátásra gyakorolt hatásainak, a neurológus szak­orvosok telemedicinával kapcsolatos ismereteinek és a távellátás hazai helyzetének feltárását tűztük ki célul, elsősorban a Parkinson-kóros betegek ellátására fókuszálva.2021 júliusa és októbere között orszá­gos online felmérést végeztünk olyan aktívan praktizáló magyar neurológus szakorvosok körében, akik részt vesznek a Parkinson-kóros betegek ellátásában.Összesen 104 neurológus töltötte ki kérdő­ívünket. Az ellátás minden szintjét elemezhettük mind a közfinanszírozott, mind a magánellátásban. A járóbeteg-szakrendelésre fordított heti idő és a hetente látott Parkinson-kóros betegek száma egyaránt jelentősen csökkent a közfinanszírozott ellátásban, míg a magán­ellátásban szinte változatlan maradt (p0,001). A magánellátásban a betegek nagyobb arányban vehettek igénybe személyes ellátást (78,8% vs. 90,8%, p0,001). A legtöbb neurológus által már végzett távkonzultációs tevékenység a gyógyszerfelírás volt (n = 103, 99%). Az elektronikus üzenet volt a legtöbbek által ismert telemedicinális eszköz (n = 98, 94,2%), és a telefonhívást alkalmazta már a legtöbb neurológus (n = 95, 91,3%). A videóalapú konzultációt a magánellátásban szélesebb körben használták (30,1% vs. 15,5%, p = 0,001). A megkérdezettek a telemedicinális ellátás eszközeit a Parkinson-kór progressziójának és tüneteinek követé­sére, illetve az antiparkinson gyógyszerelésben módosítás szükségességének megítélésére tartották a legalkal­ma­sabbnak.A Covid-19 jelentős hatással volt a Par­kin­son-kóros betegek ellátására hazánkban. A telemedicina enyhítette ezen káros hatásokat, ugyanakkor további fejlesztések a betegellátás még megbízhatóbb elemévé tehetnék a telemedicinát.

The importance and value of providing palliative care for patients with neurologic disease is increasingly recognized. While palliative and neuropalliative specialists may be well-positioned to provide this care, there is a shortage of specialists to address these needs. As a result, much of the upfront palliative care will naturally be provided by the treating neurologist. It is imperative that all neurologists receive quality training in primary palliative care skills. As the subspecialty of neuropalliative care grows, the need for specialty neuropalliative education has arisen. This chapter reviews existing educational initiatives and common neuropalliative-oriented career tracks and identifies opportunities for growth along the continuum of medical education and beyond.

Sodium and water perturbations, manifesting as hyponatraemia and hypernatraemia, are common in patients who had an acute stroke, and are associated with worse outcomes and increased mortality. Other non-stroke-related causes of sodium and water perturbations in these patients include underlying comorbidities and concomitant medications. Additionally, hospitalised patients who had an acute stroke may receive excessive intravenous hypotonic solutions, have poor fluid intake due to impaired neurocognition and consciousness, may develop sepsis or are administered drugs (eg, mannitol); factors that can further alter serum sodium levels. Sodium and water perturbations can also be exacerbated by the development of endocrine consequences after an acute stroke, including secondary adrenal insufficiency, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion and diabetes insipidus. Recently, COVID-19 infection has been reported to increase the risk of development of sodium and water perturbations that may further worsen the outcomes of patients who had an acute stroke. Because there are currently no accepted consensus guidelines on the management of sodium and water perturbations in patients who had an acute stroke, we conducted a systematic review of the literature published in English and in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and December 2020, according to PRISMA guidelines, to assess on the current knowledge and clinical practices of this condition. In this review, we discuss the signs and symptoms of hyponatraemia and hypernatraemia, the pathogenesis of hyponatraemia and hypernatraemia, their clinical relevance, and we provide our recommendations for effective treatment strategies for the neurologist in the management of sodium and water perturbations in commonly encountered aetiologies of patients who had an acute stroke.

Patients with neurological disorders often have lower urinary tract dysfunction, manifesting as urinary retention or urinary incontinence, and so commonly use catheters. Neurologists should therefore be aware of the different types of catheters and appliances and their risks, benefits and complications. Clean intermittent self-catheterisation is preferable to an indwelling catheter; however, if this is not possible, then a suprapubic indwelling catheter is preferable to a urethral catheter for long-term management. We review the decision-making process when selecting catheters for neurological patients, the evidence base regarding the different options and how neurologists can recognise and address complications. We also discuss alternatives to catheterisation, such as non-invasive containment products and surgical treatments, and the indications for urological referral.

Background The initial COVID-19 pandemic shutdown led to the canceling of elective surgeries throughout most of the USA and Canada. Objective This survey was carried out on behalf of the Parkinson Study Group (PSG) to understand the impact of the shutdown on deep brain stimulation (DBS) practices in North America. Methods A survey was distributed through RedCap® to the members of the PSG Functional Neurosurgical Working Group. Only one member from each site was asked to respond to the survey. Responses were collected from May 15 to June 6, 2020. Results Twenty-three sites participated; 19 (83%) sites were from the USA and 4 (17%) from Canada. Twenty-one sites were academic medical centers. COVID-19 associated DBS restrictions were in place from 4 to 16 weeks. One-third of sites halted preoperative evaluations, while two-thirds of the sites offered limited preoperative evaluations. Institutional policy was the main contributor for the reported practice changes, with 87% of the sites additionally reporting patient-driven surgical delays secondary to pandemic concerns. Pre-post DBS associated management changes affected preoperative assessments 96%; electrode placement 87%; new implantable pulse generator (IPG) placement 83%; IPG replacement 65%; immediate postoperative DBS programming 74%; and routine DBS programming 91%. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic related shutdown resulted in DBS practice changes in almost all North American sites who responded to this large survey. Information learned could inform development of future contingency plans to reduce patient delays in care under similar circumstances.

The article outlines aspects of the current state of the problem of the priority choice of an oral anticoagulant for indefinite prevention of stroke and systemic thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. The advantages of direct oral angicoagulants over warfarin are presented, as well as a comparative analysis of the individual characteristics of the main direct oral angicoagulants from the point of view of personification of preventive therapy in accordance with modern treatment standards. The efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulant therapy has been reviewed in terms of the net clinical benefit. Particular attention is paid to the age-related aspects of choosing an anticoagulant for indefinite prophylaxis; an assessment of anticoagulants is presented in accordance with the FORTA concept, which regulates the use of drugs in elderly patients. In conclusion, recommendations are formulated for the choice of an anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation in the most common clinical situations. As a general rule, the choice of a particular drug should be individualized based on risk factors, tolerability, net clinical benefit, patient preference, potential adverse interactions, and other clinical characteristics.В статье представлены аспекты современного состояния проблемы приоритетного выбора перорального антикоагулянта для бессрочной профилактики инсульта и системных тромбоэмболий у пациентов с фибрилляцией предсердий. Изложены преимущества прямых пероральных антикоагулянтов перед варфарином, а также продемонстрирован сопоставительный анализ индивидуальных особенностей основных прямых пероральных антикоагулянтов с точки зрения персонификации превентивной терапии в соответствии с современными стандартами лечения. Вопросы эффективности и безопасности терапии пероральными антикоагулянтами рассмотрены с учетом чистой клинической выгоды. Особое внимание уделено возрастным аспектам выбора антикоагулянта для бессрочной профилактики, представлена оценка антикоагулянтов в соответствии с концепцией FORTA, регламентирующей применение лекарственных препаратов у пожилых пациентов. В заключение сформулированы рекомендации по выбору антикоагулянта у больных с фибрилляцией предсердий при наиболее часто встречающихся клинических ситуациях. Важное правило выбор конкретного препарата должен быть индивидуализирован на основании факторов риска, переносимости, чистой клинической выгоды, предпочтений пациента, потенциальных нежелательных взаимодействий и других клинических характеристик.

Many neurologic diseases are life limiting and markedly impair patients' quality of life. Growing recommendations in the field recommend that neurologists have primary skills in palliative medicine that will allow them to manage symptoms and discuss end-of-life decisions with patients and families. Previous work has shown that formal palliative care training in neurology residencies is very limited. In this article, we briefly describe a national survey of neurology residents where we assess both the quantity and quality of the teaching they receive in end-of-life care as compared to a common and an uncommon neurologic condition. Based on the gaps we identified, as well as previous studies and recommendations in neuropalliative care, we provide 9 recommendations to help neurology residency programs improve their teaching of primary neuropalliative care skills.

Since the late 19th century, when several inherited neurological disorders were described, the close relationship between Neurology and heredity were well documented by several authors in a pre-genetic era. The term Neurogenetics came to integrate two large sciences and clinical practices: Neurology and Genetics. Neurogenetics is the emerging field that studies the correlation between genetic code and the development and function of the nervous system, including behavioral traits, personality and neurological diseases. In this historical note, a timeline shows the main events and contributors since the first reports of neurogenetic diseases until the current days. In the recent years, neurologists are experiencing much broader use of new genetic diagnosis techniques in clinical practice. Thus, new challenges are arising in diagnostic approach, ethical considerations, and therapeutic options. This article aims to summarize the main historical hallmarks of Neurogenetics, from the pre-DNA era to the present, and the future directions of the field. RESUMO Desde o final do século XIX, quando diversas doenças neurológicas hereditárias foram descritas, a associação entre neurologia e hereditariedade foi bem documentada por vários autores na era pré-genética. O termo Neurogenética integra dois campos da ciência e da prática clínica: Neurologia e Genética. A Neurogenética é o campo que estuda a correlação entre o código genético e o desenvolvimento e a função do sistema nervoso, incluindo comportamento, personalidade e doenças neurológicas. Nesta nota histórica, a linha do tempo mostra os principais eventos e pesquisadores desde os primeiros relatos de doenças neurogenéticas até os dias atuais. Recentemente, neurologistas estão se deparando com maior uso de técnicas diagnósticas genéticas na prática clínica; portanto, novos desafios surgem na abordagem diagnóstica, nas considerações éticas e na terapêutica. Este artigo almeja resumir os principais marcos históricos da Neurogenética, desde a era pré-DNA até o presente, e os caminhos futuros desse campo de conhecimento.

The palliative care needs of inpatients with neurologic illness are varied, depending on diagnosis, acuity of illness, available treatment options, prognosis, and goals of care. Inpatient neurologists ought to be proficient at providing primary palliative care and effective at determining when palliative care consultants are needed. In the acute setting, palliative care should be integrated with lifesaving treatments using a framework of determining goals of care, thoughtfully prognosticating, and engaging in shared decision-making. This framework remains important when aggressive treatments are not desired or not available, or when patients are admitted to the hospital for conditions related to advanced stages of chronic neurologic disease. Because prognostic uncertainty characterizes much of neurology, inpatient neurologists must develop communication strategies that account for uncertainty while supporting shared decision-making and allowing patients and families to preserve hope. In this article, we illustrate the approach to palliative care in inpatient neurology.

The development of neurology as an independent discipline in the mid-19th century was considerably influenced by the almost simultaneous foundation of the Charcot School at the Salpetriere Hospital in Paris and the National Hospital for the Paralysed and Epileptic and it's School at Queen Square in London in the 1860's. We have reviewed the early interactions between Charcot's school and the leading neurologists at the National Hospital and also discussed their neurological antecedents and subsequent links up to the outbreak of World War 1 in 1914. Earlier interactions involved Trousseau and Duchenne in France and Graves, Todd, Laycock and Allbutt in Britain. The French Brown–Sequard was one of the first two physicians appointed to the National Hospital. Charcot was a frequent visitor to Britain culminating in his influential role in the 1881 International Medical Congress in London. He first suggested the terms “Parkinson's Disease” and “Jacksonian Epilepsy”. He attracted numerous British visitors to Paris and his studies of hysteria were influenced by Laycock, Todd and Russell Reynolds. Hughlings Jackson drew upon the anatomical studies of Gratiolet in his interactions with Broca and Charcot which influenced French views on aphasia , epilepsy and cortical localisation. Ball, an Englishman, was the first Professor of mental and brain diseases in Paris in 1877. Bruce in Edinburgh and Kinnier Wilson in London both maintained frequent contacts with Paris, where the latter first presented his studies of hepatolenticular degeneration in 1912. The Entente Cordiale of 1904 led to further interactions with the leading role of the French and British physicians Raymond and Duckworth. Two outstanding British women, Elizabeth Garrett and Blanche Edwards, qualified in Medicine in Paris with neurological interests. Our review emphasises the constructive influence of the French and British Schools on each other and thus on the development of neurology. The French influence was primarily the establishment of the anatomo-clinical method and the use of photographic illustrations in publications. The British School influence was its Clinical Assessment Skills and scientific studies of newly recognised diseases and concepts and its early development of neurosurgery .

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for conversion disorder have replaced the criterion of evidence of a "psychogenic" etiology with a criterion that patients must be "positively" diagnosed on the basis of their neurological assessment. We retrospectively studied referrals to a specialist functional neurology clinic to see how commonly the new criteria were met since DSM-5's introduction. Positive signs were reported in a quarter of referrals (26.5%), which was associated with diagnosticians' confidence (p = 0.001) and with the clinic confirming the diagnosis (p = 0.01). Our clinic found positive signs in 28.6% of the referrals. In 13 (13.3%) patients, the new criterion was not met. In conclusion, positive signs are diagnostically helpful but are only reported in a minority of assessments. A significant group of those currently believed to have conversion disorder would not meet the revised diagnostic criteria based on this.

Controversies surrounding the determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC), also known as brain death, have become increasingly common over the last decade, occasionally leading to parental refusal of all or part of a brain death evaluation or declaration. We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study of pediatric neurologists and intensivists who participate in professional listservs to ascertain perspectives and practices concerning the evaluation of DNC, specifically on obtaining permission for evaluations and managing refusals. Of the 334 respondents who had performed an evaluation for DNC, 35 percent reported they had experienced at least one parental refusal, and 64.4 percent reported that they did not seek permission to perform an evaluation. Pediatric neurologists, careproviders who had less experience doing evaluations, and careproviders who had experienced parental refusal of an evaluation were more likely to obtain permission from parents. Most (80.8 percent) of respondents reported that their institution had a DNC policy. We found variability in many aspects of DNC evaluations and declarations, as well as the handling of refusals. Lack of consistency may make it more difficult for careproviders and families. Greater understanding of parental refusal of DNC evaluation is essential to inform efforts to increase consistency.

In the beginning of modern Neurology, between the 19th and the 20th centuries, neurologists often assumed simultaneous positions of intellectual prominence and gained significant cultural credentials. Not only observers and admirers of music, literature, and the fine arts, many neurologists and neuroscientists worldwide developed significant cultural careers. When studying the careers and lives of the founders of Brazilian Neurology, one finds only sparse information on their cultural activities, which are often relegated to side notes. Therefore, the author aims to focus on the literary output of some of the most important early Brazilian neurologists, who excelled in poetry or longer written forms and were eventually immortalized by the Academia Brasileira de Letras: Antônio Austregésilo, Aloysio de Castro, Deolindo Couto, and Miguel Couto, contextualizing their artistic production in their respective academic lives.

In the 1920s, neurology was a fledgling discipline. Various attempts were made to establish programs relating to neurological care and research. One such initiative was the Neurological Study Unit (NSU) at the Yale School of Medicine. My aim is to chronicle the early years of the NSU (1924–40): the motivations for establishing the unit, its structure, its challenges, and its evolution. I have studied all documents related to the NSU at Manuscripts & Archives, Yale University Library. The NSU was heralded as a “combined attack on a single problem from many angles.” It was slow to develop, however, and had a number of missing elements. While some of this may have been due to a lack of funds and the absence of a dedicated neurologist, it was also the result of a failure to conceptualize a neurological unit, the slow evolution-into-existence of a nascent and fledgling medical discipline, growing pains and frictions within the leadership, a university-based rather than a hospital-based model of operation, and turf wars between neurology and allied disciplines.

Background Sexual dysfunction (SD) is a common comorbidity in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). It affects the quality of life and remains an overlooked condition. The objective of this study was to describe how Colombian neurologists assess and treat SD and explore the barriers during sexual function evaluation. Methods In this observational cross-sectional study we developed a questionnaire for neurologists with 4 sections (demographic data, evaluation and treatment of SD, and possible reasons for not discussing sexual dysfunction.) It was sent via email to 326 Colombian neurologists. We grouped the answers according to the type of consultation (neurologists from a MS program or no MS program). We described through absolute frequencies and proportions. Results Fifty neurologists answered the survey. 64% stated that they usually study sexual dysfunction in neurological disorders. The main methods employed were private reading (86%) and attending conferences (14%). 5/50 participants have never attend pwMS; the Sect. 2–4 was not answered by them. 29% work in a MS program, all of them asked their patients about sexual function, but 18.75% of physicians working outside an MS program have never asked about it. Main reasons for not talking about sexual dysfunction were lack of knowledge (65.1%), presence of a companion (65.1%) and lack of time (55.8%). 91% of the neurologists reported that their patients usually and frequently ask about sexual function. Neurologists use informal questions to assess sexual function (80%), although 64.4% said that they are aware of SD questionnaires. When sexual dysfunction is detected, 91% of neurologists refer patients to another specialist and 87% do not start any treatment. Conclusions Colombian neurologists are concerned with sexual function in pwMS, however it remains an underdiagnosed an undertreated condition. It is necessary to strengthen knowledge about the diagnosis and treatment of sexual dysfunction in pwMS, for neurologists and patients. It is also imperative to eliminate barriers around the topic and include sexual function evaluation and treatment as the routine care of pwMS.

Palliative care is increasingly becoming an established part of medical care, providing the holistic assessment and management of the person at the center of care-physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. This had originally been primarily provided for people with terminal cancers but in the last 50 years, this care has extended to caring for people with issues throughout disease progression and for all diagnoses, including neurologic diseases. Palliative care in fact is now included within guidelines and standards for many neurologic diseases. Palliative care may be delivered as an approach provided by all health and social care professionals; by focused care provided within neurology; and through the involvement of specialist palliative care and neuropalliative care for more complex issues. The education of neurologists and palliative care specialists is essential to enable all to be aware of the issues faced by patients and their families and provide adequate support for patients, families, and healthcare professionals. In this way, the quality of life can be maintained as much as possible and patients are able to die with as little distress as possible, with their families and carers supported.

As the incidence of neurologic (particularly neurodegenerative) diseases continues to rise, so too will the palliative needs in this patient population. To appropriately care for these patients and families, neurologists and palliative care providers will need to strengthen collaboration. Palliative care providers not formally trained in neurology may feel ill-equipped to manage some of the distinct neuropalliative care needs of these patients. Here, we provide insights into the unique characteristics of patients with neurologic disease and emphasize the relevance of the palliative care skillset in this population to aid the collaboration between palliative care providers and neurologists.

This chapter describes several features of palliative care that we believe can assist neurologists in caring for patients with serious illness. These features include the importance of recognizing suffering, the central of total pain (including physical, emotional, spiritual, and existential aspects), structural features of palliative care such as the distinction been palliative care and hospice, and the concept of primary and specialty palliative care. Structural features of palliative care such as interdisciplinary teamwork, approaches to self-care, and a perspective on prognostic uncertainty are also considered. Throughout this chapter, the focus is on ways in which neurologists can integrate these approaches in caring for patients and their families.

Immigrant neurologists on a visa make up one-fourth of our neurology resident workforce. In this article, we describe the challenges faced by them in pursuit of a career as physician-scientists. We highlight the key role that immigration status plays in various aspects of research advancement early along the neurology pipeline, pertaining to clinical career decisions and the associated delay in achieving these milestones. We conclude with a call to action to address these key roadblocks, which would have the additional potential benefit of improving inclusion and diversity in clinical and translational science. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:542-545.

Neurological disorders are the leading cause of disability and the second leading cause of death globally. To challenge this enormous disease burden, scientists are pursuing innovative solutions to maintain and improve the quality of neurological care. Despite the availability of many effective evidence-based practices, many patients with neurological disorders cannot access these (or receive them inefficiently after a long delay) and may be exposed to unnecessary, expensive, and potentially harmful treatments. To promote the systematic uptake of evidence-based practices into the real world, a new scientific study of methods has been developed: implementation science. In implementation science research, transdisciplinary research teams systematically (using theory, model, and framework) assess local barriers to facilitate the adoption of evidence-based practices and examine potential solutions using implementation strategies (interventions that help adoption of intended practices) targeting multiple levels in the health care system, including patient, provider, clinic, facility, organization, or broader community and policy environment. The success of these strategies (implementation outcomes) is measured by the extent and quality of the implementation. Implementation studies can be either observational or interventional but are distinct from traditional efficacy or effectiveness studies. Traditional neuroscience research and clinical trials, conducted in controlled settings, focus on discovering new insights with little consideration of translating those insights into the everyday practice of a resource-constrained and dynamic health care system. Thus, neurologists should become familiar with implementation science to reduce the knowledge-practice gap, maximize health care value, and improve management of brain disorders affecting public health.

Objective A shorter door-to-puncture time is an independent predictor of good clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who undergo mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We recently initiated a protocol for direct care from neurointerventionalists (NIs) in the emergency department (ED) rather than from non-NI neurologists for patients with AIS. Our aim was to investigate whether NIs, as the first point-of-care physicians for stroke in the ED, could shorten door-to-puncture time compared to non-NI neurologists. Methods From January 2020 to December 2020, 50 patients with AIS underwent MT at our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of physician who provided initial care for stroke in the ED: (a) NI group (n = 20) and (b) non-NI group (n = 30). The door-to-puncture time was retrospectively analyzed. Results The NI group had a significantly shorter door-to-puncture time than the non-NI group (135.2 ± 50.0 minutes vs. 167.2 ± 54.3 minutes, P = 0.040). A door-to-puncture time of ≤120 minutes was more frequently achieved in the NI group than in the non-NI group (55.0% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.022). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that a door-to-puncture time of ≤120 minutes was independently associated with the NI group (adjusted odds ratio 4.098, 95% confidence interval 1.085–15.479, P = 0.037). Conclusions Our study showed that NIs, as the first point-of-care stroke physicians in the ED, were associated with shorter door-to-puncture times. We suggest that NIs should be at the forefront of care for patients with AIS in the acute setting by performing triage and deciding on and performing MT.

Child neurology programs can be net margin generators for children's hospitals. The relative value unit (RVU) expectations for child neurologists are heavily influenced by proceduralists (neurophysiologists, Botox injectors, and so forth) and means in most RVU data sets are not realistic expectations for Evaluation and Management coding, outpatient neurologists. Yet each neurologist has a net revenue/expense ratio of 1.97 for a hospital neurology enterprise, so each of the neurologists generates nearly twice their salary for the hospital. Downstream revenue is even more impressive. Each neurologist generates about $2,000,000.00 in downstream revenue per year.

The presence of endolymphatic hydrops has been studied in many neurological disorders. The pathophysiological mechanisms may involve CSF pressure variations, transmitted to the innear ear. This hydrops could play a role in vestibular or cochlear symptoms. For the ENT specialist, the etiological diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops is a challenge, and neurological etiologies must be known. The treatment of these neurological causes could be effective on cochleo-vestibular symptoms. The knowledge of endolymphatic hydrops could also be a target for noninvasive tests, able to estimate CSF pressure variations. For the neurologist, this could represent a useful tool for the diagnosis and follow-up, in some of these neurological disorders, related to a CSF pressure imbalance. The purpose of this paper is to summarize literature data on endolymphatic hydrops in neurological disorders. We define some neurological conditions, for which there is a particular interest in noninvasive investigations of endolymphatic hydrops.

Background Neurology is a field of increasing subspecialization. There is no published data regarding the proportion of neurology subspecialists in the Baltic States. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify factors associated with neurology subspecialty choice, to examine possible differences between neurology residents' and junior neurologists' view of subspecialty, and to assess perceived subspecialty acquisition opportunities and subspecialty attractiveness. Methods The research was conducted as an anonymous online survey between December 28, 2020, and January 24, 2021 of neurology residents and neurologists who completed their residency during the last 5 years in the Baltic States. Results In total, 72 residents and 65 neurologists participated. "Cerebrovascular diseases" and "multiple sclerosis and autoimmune diseases of the nervous system" were rated as the two most attractive subspecialties by residents, whereas "headache" and "clinical neurophysiology" were the most attractive among junior neurologists. "Vertigo and dizziness" and "dementia" were ranked the least attractive among both groups. "Cerebrovascular diseases" were perceived as having the most acquisition opportunities. The two most common determinants of subspecialty choice were "medical content of the subspecialty" and "influence of mentor during undergraduate studies or residency ". Conclusions Two-thirds of junior neurologists subspecialize in at least one subspecialty, and one-third of residents are already determined to pursue subspecialty training. Junior neurologists rated most outpatient-related subspecialties as more attractive than neurology residents. Between the Baltic States' universities, there was a significant difference in the number of residents who were determined to pursue subspecialty training.

The "toe phenomenon" refers to the extension (dorsiflexion) of the great toe, which occurs instead of the normal flexion following stimulation of the foot sole. Its clinical significance was not fully appreciated until Joseph Jules François Félix Babiński (1857-1932) described it in 1896. In 1881, Ernst Strümpell (1853-1925) had described a continuous (tonic) extension of the big toe, a finding that years later the French neurologist Jean-Athanase Sicard (1872-1929) recognized as an equivalent of the "toe phenomenon", also indicating pyramidal tract dysfunction. Previously, this phenomenon had been mentioned in patients only passingly and without providing a picture of it. In 1887, the German neurologist Adolph Seeligmüller (1837-1912) mentioned the tonic extension of the big toe among the characteristic clinical features of spastic infantile hemiplegia-a condition first described by the Austrian physician Moritz Benedikt (1835-1920) in 1868. Seeligmüller incorrectly attributed the tonic extension of the big toe to spastic contracture of the extensor hallucis longus muscle. However, he put great emphasis on this sign and considered it worth being illustrated. Adolph Seeligmüller therefore provided the very first graphic illustration of the (tonic) "toe phenomenon" in the medical literature. Of note, the first photographic illustration of this sign made by Babiński appeared only in 1900, when it had already been adopted by neurologists all over the world.

ObjectiveHealth care delivery systems transformed rapidly at the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to slow the spread of the virus while identifying novel methods for providing care. In many ways, the pandemic affected both persons with neurologic illness and neurologists. This study describes the perspectives and experiences of community neurologists providing care for patients with neurodegenerative illnesses during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study with 20 community neurologists from a multisite comparative-effectiveness trial of outpatient palliative care from July 23, 2020, to November 11, 2020. Participants were interviewed individually about the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on their professional and personal lives. Interviews were analyzed with matrix analysis to identify key themes.ResultsFour main themes illustrated the impact of the pandemic on community neurologists: (1) challenges of the current political climate, (2) lack of support for new models of care, (3) being on the frontline of suffering, and (4) clinician self-care. Taken together, the themes capture the unusual environment in which community neurologists practice, the lack of clinician trust among some patients, patient and professional isolation, and opportunities to support quality care delivery.ConclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic and pandemic politics created an environment that made care provision challenging for community neurologists. Efforts to improve care delivery should proactively work to reduce clinician burnout while incorporating support for new models of care adopted due to the pandemic.Trial Registration InformationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03076671.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: Strong relationships and effective communication between clinicians support care coordination and contribute to care quality. As a new mechanism of clinician communication, electronic consultations (e-consults) may have downstream effects on care provision and coordination. Objective: The objective of this study was to understand primary care providers’ and specialists’ perspectives on how e-consults affect communication and relationships between clinicians. Research Design: Qualitative study using thematic analysis of semistructured interviews. Subjects: Six of 8 sites in the VISN 1 (Veterans Integrated Service Network) in New England were chosen, based on variation in organization and received e-consult volume. Seventy-three respondents, including 60 clinicians in primary care and 3 high-volume specialties (cardiology, pulmonology, and neurology) and 13 clinical leaders at the site and VISN level, were recruited. Measures: Participants’ perspectives on the role and impact of e-consults on communication and relationships between clinicians. Results: Clinicians identified 3 types of e-consults’ social affordances: (1) e-consults were praised for allowing specialist advice to be more grounded in patient data and well-documented, but concerns about potential legal liability and increased transparency of communication to patients and others were also noted; (2) e-consults were perceived as an imperfect modality for iterative communication, especially for complex conversations requiring shared deliberation; (3) e-consults were understood as a factor influencing clinician relationships, but clinicians disagreed on whether e-consults promote or undermine relationship building. Conclusions: Clinicians have diverse concerns about the implications of e-consults for communication and relationships. Our findings may inform efforts to expand and improve the use of e-consults in diverse health care settings.

The US Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General identifies the five most important federal fraud and abuse laws that are most applicable to physicians: the False Claims Act, the Anti-Kickback Statute, the Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark Law), the Exclusion Authorities, and the Civil Monetary Penalties LawThe False Claims Act is the US government's primary tool for combating fraud perpetrated through the filing of false claims for federal government reimbursement. Neurologists and companies serving the needs of neurologic patients have not been immune from False Claims Act-related legal action. This article provides an overview of the False Claims Act, uses real-life neurologic cases to illustrate the range of False Claims Act violations and recoveries, and offers some practical compliance suggestions.

Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890) is one of the most important painters of our history. Celebrating 130 years since the death of this genius, this article unveils the surprising relationship between van Gogh and neurology. Besides all his eternal artistic output, Vincent also suffered all his life from a neurological disease. Many articles have already investigated his illness and epilepsy appears to be one of the most reasonable diagnosis. There is much evidence that van Gogh's work was influenced by his neurological condition in several ways. Besides, the analysis of Vincent's life can provide several valuable teachings to neurologists.

Objective. The aim of the current study was to investigate the opinions of neurologists and psychiatrists in Iran on the necessity of COVID‐19 vaccination in patients with epilepsy (PWE). These data can help policy makers understand the concerns of these healthcare professionals. Methods. This was a survey study. On September 1st, 2020 we sent a questionnaire (using Google‐forms) to all neurologists and psychiatrists in Iran via WhatsApp. The survey included three general questions (age, sex, and discipline) and six COVID‐specific questions. Results. In total, 202 physicians participated in this study (116 neurologists and 86 psychiatrists). Of the participants, 27% believed that PWE are at increased risk of contracting COVID‐19. The majority (74%) of the participants would confidently recommend COVID‐19 vaccine to their patients. However, only 49% of the physicians would recommend such a vaccine to all patients; others would consider it in special populations only. The overwhelming majority (91%) of the participants would recommend COVID‐19 vaccine only when a reliable vaccine becomes available. Many physicians would trust a vaccine that is approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) (46%) or a vaccine that is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA‐USA) (34%). Significance. Physicians have concerns on the issue of the necessity of (a future) COVID‐19 vaccine in PWE. The most important concern is the reliability of a vaccine and in this regard, two health agencies, the WHO and the FDA, are the most trusted organizations to approve a vaccine against COVID‐19.