1. Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer
- Author
-
Yu Lan, Päivi J. Koskinen, Niklas Paulin, Sofia Khan, Pirkko Härkönen, Tiina E. Kähkönen, Peter J. Boström, Otto Ettala, Maija P. Valta, Pekka Taimen, Jani Ylä-Pelto, Laura L. Elo, and Johanna Tuomela
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,business.industry ,Urology ,Histology ,medicine.disease ,Androgen receptor ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,030104 developmental biology ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Reproductive Medicine ,Prostate ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Cancer research ,medicine ,Carcinoma ,Immunohistochemistry ,Original Article ,business ,Immunodeficiency ,Hormone - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are considered to better recapitulate the histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of human cancer than other preclinical models. Despite technological advances, PDX models from hormone naïve primary prostate cancer are scarce. We performed a detailed analysis of PDX methodology using a robust subcutaneous model and fresh tissues from patients with primary hormone naïve prostate cancer. METHODS: Clinical prostate tumor specimens (n=26, Gleason score 6–10) were collected from robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland), cut into pieces, and implanted subcutaneously into 84 immunodeficient mice. Engraftments and the adjacent material from prostatic surgical specimens were compared using histology, immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: The probability of a successful engraftment correlated with the presence of carcinoma in the implanted tissue. Tumor take rate was 41%. Surprisingly, mouse hormone supplementation inhibited tumor take rate, whereas the degree of mouse immunodeficiency did not have an effect. Histologically, the engrafted tumors closely mimicked their parental tumors, and the Gleason grades and copy number variants of the engraftments were similar to those of their primary tumors. Expression levels of androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen, and keratins were retained in engraftments, and a detailed genomic analysis revealed high fidelity of the engraftments with their corresponding primary tumors. However, in the second or third passage of tumors, the carcinoma areas were almost completely replaced by benign tissue with frequent degenerative or metaplastic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous primary prostate engraftments preserve the phenotypic and genotypic landscape. Thus, they serve a potential model for personalized medicine and preclinical research but their use may be limited to the first passage.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF