Search

Differentiated models of HIV care (DMOC) aim to improve health care efficiency. We describe outcomes of five DMOC in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: facility adherence clubs (facility AC) and community adherence clubs (community AC), community antiretroviral treatment (ART) groups (CAG), spaced fast lane appointments (SFLA), and community pick up points (PuP). This retrospective cohort study included 8241 eligible patients enrolled into DMOC between 1/1/2012 and 31/12/2018. We assessed retention in DMOC and on ART, and viral load suppression (200–399 copies/mL) was associated with higher hazards of VL rebound and attrition from ART. Concurrent implementation of several DMOC in a large ART program is feasible and can achieve sustained retention on ART and VL suppression. more...

Background Innovative models to distribute oral HIV self-tests (HIVST) provide an opportunity to increase access to HIV testing, especially for hard-to-reach populations. This study aimed to describe the acceptability of unsupervised peer-distribution of HIVST as a method to scale-up HIV testing. Methods In this study, lay counsellors or community health workers provided HIVST kits to primary recipients (PRs) for distribution to their sexual partners, anyone in their social network (termed secondary recipients) or for self-testing, from September 2018 to March 2020. The study was conducted in Eshowe and Mbongolwane areas in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. A structured questionnaire was administered during the recruitment and passive follow-up, when people came for confirmatory HIV testing. Electronic records were retrospectively examined to determine initiation of antiretroviral treatment (ART) for all HIVST users and non-users. Results Among 36,708 people approached to be primary recipients, 9,891 (26.9%) accepted; 31,341 HIVST kits were distributed with a median of three (IQR: 2–4) per peer. PRs were predominately recruited at primary health clinics (PHCs). However, acceptability of HIVST was thrice as high at community-based testing sites compared to PHCs (64.5% vs. 21.0%; p Conclusion Unsupervised peer-distribution of HIVST was feasible and acceptable, with more than 25% accepting to be peer-distributors. Acceptability of HIVST was thrice as high in community sites compared to clinics. more...