Search

Background Bevacizumab is an approved treatment after primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer. However, there is limited information on bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy before interval debulking surgery. Objective To evaluate neoadjuvant bevacizumab in a randomized phase II trial. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV high-grade serous/endometrioid ovarian cancer were randomized to receive four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without >= 3 cycles of bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. After interval debulking surgery, all patients received post-operative chemotherapy (three cycles) and bevacizumab for 15 months. The primary end point was complete macroscopic response rate at interval debulking surgery. Results Of 68 patients randomized, 64 completed four neoadjuvant cycles; 22 of 33 (67%) in the chemotherapy-alone arm and 31 of 35 (89%) in the bevacizumab arm (p=0.029) underwent surgery. The complete macroscopic response rate did not differ between treatment arms in either the intention-to-treat population of 68 patients (6.1% vs 5.7%, respectively; p=0.25) or the 55 patients who underwent surgery (8.3% vs 6.5%; p=1.00). There was no difference in complete cytoreduction rate or progression-free survival between the treatment arms. During neoadjuvant therapy, grade >= 3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy alone than with bevacizumab (61% vs 29%, respectively; p=0.008). Intestinal (sub)occlusion, fatigue/asthenia, abdominal infection, and thrombocytopenia were less frequent with bevacizumab. The incidence of grade >= 3 adverse events was 9% in the control arm versus 16% in the experimental arm in the month after surgery. Conclusions Adding three to four pre-operative cycles of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable disease did not improve the complete macroscopic response rate or surgical outcome, but improved surgical operability without increasing toxicity. These results support the early integration of bevacizumab in carefully selected high-risk patients requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy for initially unresectable ovarian cancer.

To determine the ability of simple, rapid tests to identify HIV-1 antibody-positive specimens in field settings using the World Health Organization's (WHO) alternative testing strategies.Three-phase evaluation of simple, rapid assays using banked specimens and prospectively collected serum specimens at regional hospitals and rural clinics.Seven test (Retrocell, Genie, HIVCHEK, SUDS HIV-1, Testpack, Serodia HIV-1, and HIV-1/2 RTD) were evaluated and results compared with standard enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Western blot results (phase 1). Further evaluation consisted of prospective testing of routine specimens at regional (phase 2; n = 900) and rural, peripheral laboratories (phase 3; n = 1266) throughout Honduras with selected assays.Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each assay and combination of assays for each phase to evaluate the effectiveness of the WHO alternative testing strategies. All tests in all phases were99% sensitive after correcting for technical errors, with two exceptions (SUDS, phase 1; HIVCHEK, phase 3). In phase 3, where the testing algorithm was diagnostic, several combinations of assays were 100% sensitive and specific using WHO strategy II or III. For the Honduras Ministry of Health, the combination of Retrocell and Genie was found to be equally sensitive, more specific (no indeterminate results), and less expensive than EIA/Western blot.Combinations of rapid, simple HIV antibody assays provide sensitivity and specificity performance comparable to EIA/Western blot. Application of these combinations in the WHO alternative testing strategies provides an inexpensive and effective method of determining HIV status. Assay combinations using these strategies can be easily performed in small, rural laboratories and have been implemented in routine HIV screening in Honduras.In 1992, the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced 3 HIV testing algorithms designed to provide rapid, accurate results equivalent to those obtained by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Western blot but at reduced costs. The capability of the WHO strategy to identify HIV-1 antibodies in field settings was evaluated at regional hospitals and rural clinics in Honduras. In the study's first phase, the results of 7 tests (Retrocell, Genie, HIVCHEK, SUDS HIV-1, Testpack, Serodia HIV-1, and HIV-1/2 RTD) were compared with results for 600 sera previously tested by EIA and Western blot. Phase 2 entailed prospective testing of 900 routine specimens at regional laboratories, while phase 3 screened 1266 specimens at rural, peripheral laboratories. In the first phase of the analysis, 5 assays had a sensitivity of 100%; the remaining 2 were 99.7% and 99.3% sensitive and specificities ranged from 92.8 to 100%. In field settings, sensitivities ranged from 96.4 to 99.3%. Moreover, in the third phase, several combinations of tests were 100% sensitive or specific when the WHO strategy of basing the choice of assay on the purpose of the screening (seroprevalence studies, screening of blood, or patient diagnosis) was employed. The combination of Retrocell and Genie was found to be equally sensitive, more specific, and less expensive than EIA or Western blot.

While Honduras is home to only 15% of Central America's population, it has 60% of the region's AIDS cases. There have been 4973 reported cases of full-blown AIDS in the country and the Health Ministry reports that more than 8000 Hondurans have been infected with HIV since the first Honduran case was diagnosed in 1985. 995 people with AIDS have since died. The authors conducted an investigation to determine which HIV-1 subtype is present in Honduras and the degree of genetic variation among HIV-1 strains by analyzing viral nucleotide sequences from the envelope region of HIV-1 isolates obtained from the two most affected regions of the country. They determined the predominant HIV-1 subtype among 27 HIV-1-infected patients attending sexually transmitted disease clinics in San Pedro Sula and Tegucigalpa by sequencing and analyzing the C2V3 regions of the envelope glycoprotein gp 120. Genomic DNA was isolated from patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Phylogenetic analysis determined that all 27 Honduran sequences clustered with known subtype B sequences.