Search

Immediate portal reperfusion is mandatory following hepatectomy combined with portal vein (PV) resection. This retrospective study analyzes the feasibility and the outcomes of the Rex shunt (RS) for reconstruction of the left portal vein (LPV) and reperfusion of the remnant left liver or lobe following hepatectomy for cancer combined with resection of the PV in adult patients.From 2018 to 2021, an RS was used in the above setting to achieve R0 resection or when the standard LPV reconstruction failed or was deemed technically impossible.There were 6 male and 5 female patients (median age, 58 years) with perihilar cancer (5 cases) or miscellaneous cancers invading the PV (6 cases). A major hepatectomy was performed in 10/11 patients. The RS was indicated to achieve R0 resection or for technical reasons in 8 and 3 cases, respectively, and was feasible in all consecutive attempts with (10 cases) or without an interposed synthetic graft (1 case). Two fatal complications (PV thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and three non-severe complications occurred in four patients within 90 days of surgery. Two patients died of tumor recurrence with a patent RS at 13 and 29 months, and 7 were recurrence free with a patent shunt with a follow-up of 1 to 37 months (median, 15 months).In case of remnant left liver or lobe following hepatectomy combined with resection of the PV, the RS may help to achieve R0 resection and is a valuable option to perform technically satisfying portal reperfusion of the remnant left liver or lobe.

Background During surgery, any mismatch between oxygen delivery (DO2) and consumption (VO2) can promote the development of postoperative complications. The respiratory exchange ratio (RER), defined as the ratio of carbon dioxide (CO2) production (VCO2) to VO2, may be a useful noninvasive tool for detecting inadequate DO2. The primary objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that RER measured during liver transplantation may predict postoperative morbidity. Secondary objectives were to assess the ability of other variables used to assess the DO2/VO2 relationship, including arterial lactate, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and veno-arterial difference in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (VAPCO2gap), to predict postoperative complications. Methods This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients who underwent liver transplantation for end stage liver disease from June 27th, 2020, to September 5th, 2021. Patients with acute liver failure were excluded. All patients were routinely equipped with a pulmonary artery catheter. The primary analysis was a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve constructed to investigate the discriminative ability of the mean RER measured during surgery to predict postoperative complications. RER was calculated at five standardized time points during the surgery, at the same time as measurement of blood lactate levels and arterial and mixed venous blood gases, which were compared as a secondary analysis. Results Of the 115 patients included, 57 developed at least one postoperative complication. The mean RER (median [25–75] percentiles) during surgery was significantly higher in patients with complications than in those without (1.04[0.96–1.12] vs 0.88[0.84–0.94]; p p 2/VO2 relationship (arterial lactate, SvO2, and VAPCO2gap) in predicting postoperative complications. Conclusion During liver transplantation, the RER can reliably predict postoperative complications. Implementing this measure intraoperatively may provide a warning for physicians of impending complications and justify more aggressive optimization of oxygen delivery. Further studies are required to determine whether correcting the RER is feasible and could reduce the incidence of complications.

The role of positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PET/CT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management is not clearly defined. Our objective was to analyze the utility of dual-PET/CT (18F-FDG + 18F-Choline) imaging findings on the BCLC staging and treatment decision for HCC patients.Between January 2011 and April 2019, 168 consecutive HCC patients with available baseline dual-PET/CT imaging data were retrospectively analyzed. To identify potential refinement criteria for surgically-treated patients, survival Kaplan-Meier curves of various standard-of-care and dual-PET/CT baseline parameters were estimated. Finally, multivariate cox proportional hazard ratios of the most relevant clinico-biological and/or PET parameters were estimated.Dual-PET/CT findings increased the score of BCLC staging in 21 (12.5%) cases. In 24.4% (n=41) of patients, the treatment strategy was modified by the PET findings. Combining AFP levels at a threshold of 10 ng/ml with 18F-FDG or 18F-Choline N status significantly impacted DFS (p0.05). In particular, the combined criteria of the N+ status assessed by 18F-Choline with AFP threshold of 10 ng/ml provided a highly predictive composite parameter for estimation of DFS according to multivariate analysis (HR=10.6, p0.05).The 18F-Choline / AFP composite parameter appears promising, and further prospective studies are mandatory to validate its oncological impact.

Introduction: The incidence of primary non-function (PNF) after liver transplantation (LT) remains a major concern with the increasing use of marginal grafts. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence is an imaging technique used in hepatobiliary surgery and LT. Because few early predictors are available, we aimed to quantify in real time the fluorescence of grafts during LT to predict their 3 months survival. Patients and methods: After graft revascularization, ICG was intravenously injected, then the fluorescence of the graft was captured with a near infrared camera and postoperatively quantified. A multi-parametric modelling of the parenchymal fluorescence intensity curve was proposed, and a predictive model of graft survival was tested. Results: Between July 2017 and May 2019, 76 LT were included, among which 6 recipients were re-transplanted (re-LT+ ). No side effects of ICG injection were observed. The parameter a150 (temporal course of fluorescence intensity) was significantly higher in the group re-LT+ group (0.022s-1 [0.016-0.035] versus 0.012s-1 [0.009-0.015], p=0.01). This parameter was the only independent predictive factor of graft survival at 3 months (OR=2.4 CI95% [1.05-5.5] p=0.03). The best cut-off for the parameter a150 (0.0155s-1 ) predicted the graft survival at 3 months with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 79% (AUC=0.82 [0.67-0.98], p=0.01). Conclusion: Quantitative assessment of intraoperative ICG fluorescence on the graft was feasible to predict graft survival at 3 months with a good sensitivity and specificity. Further prospective studies should validate these results over larger cohorts and evaluate the clinical impact of this tool.

Summary Extrahepatic biliary duplication is a rare congenital biliary malformation, even more so when associated with heterotopic gastric mucosa. This case report highlights the difficulty of diagnosing such biliary abnormalities, in particular when the duplicated extrahepatic bile duct is the only structure visible by imaging as it is masking the common bile duct. This report shows that extrahepatic bile duct duplication may be a cause of chronic biliary obstruction and secondary sclerosing cholangitis. It has to be considered as a differential diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis in children and adolescents. Furthermore, a potential link between the 46,XX karyotype and biliary duplication is discussed.

Resume But de l’etude Le but de l’etude etait d’evaluer le role pronostique de 4 solutions de conservation en transplantation hepatique (TH). Patients et methodes Il s’agit d’une etude retrospective a partir de toutes les TH de tous les centres francais (n = 22) enregistrees dans la base de donnees prospective de l’Agence de la Biomedecine (Cristal) entre 2008 et 2013. Les solutions de preservation utilisees etaient : Celsior, IGL-1, SCOT 15 ou UW. Les criteres d’exclusion etaient : solution inconnue ou inhomogene ou solution HTK (3 % seulement des TH). Le critere principal de jugement etait la survie des patients. Les criteres secondaires etaient la survie des greffons et la duree de reanimation. Resultats Parmi 6347 TH realisees, 4928 ont ete incluses pour lesquelles la solution de preservation utilisee etaient Celsior (30 %), IGL-1 (44 %), SCOT 15 (10 %) et UW (16 %). La survie des patients etait de 86 %, 80 % et 74 % a 1, 3 et 5 ans, respectivement, sans difference entre les 4 solutions (p = 0,78). La survie des greffons etait respectivement de 82 %, 75 % et 69 % a 1, 3 et 5 ans, sans difference entre les 4 solutions (p = 0,80). Le sejour en reanimation etait different selon la solution utilisee en analyse univariee (p Conclusion Le type de solution de conservation utilisee (Celsior, IGL-1, SCOT 15 ou UW) n’a pas d’influence sur la survie des patients ou des greffons apres TH.

Although many prognostic factors of primary graft dysfunction after liver transplantation (LT) are available, it remains difficult to predict failure in a given recipient.We aimed to determine whether the intraoperative assay of arterial lactate concentration at the end of LT (LCEOT) might constitute a reliable biological test to predict early outcomes [primary nonfunction (PNF), early graft dysfunction (EAD)].We reviewed data from a prospective database in a single center concerning patients transplanted between January 2015 and December 2016 (n = 296).There was no statistical imbalance between the training (year 2015) and validation groups (year 2016) for epidemiological and perioperative feature. Ten patients (3.4%) presented with PNF, and EAD occurred in 62 patients (20.9%); 9 patients died before postoperative day (POD) 90. LCEOT ≥5 mmol/L was the best cut-off point to predict PNF (Se=83.3%, SP=74.3%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+)=3.65, negative likelihood ratio (LR-)=0.25, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)=14.44) and was predictive of PNF (P = 0.02), EAD (P = 0.05), and death ≤ POD90 (P = 0.06). Added to the validated BAR-score, LCEOT improved its predictive value regarding POD 90 survival with a better AUC (0.87) than BAR score (0.74). The predictive value of LCEOT was confirmed in the validation cohort.As a reflection of both hypoperfusion and tissue damage, the assay of arterial LCEOT ≥5 mmol/L appears to be a strong predictor of early graft outcomes and may be used as an endpoint in studies assessing the impact of perioperative management. Its accessibility and low cost could impose it as a reliable parameter to anticipate postoperative management and help clinicians for decision-making in the first PODs.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. In patients where surgical resection is possible, outcome is influenced by perioperative morbidity and lymph node status. Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with improved clinical and oncological outcomes in primary and metastatic liver cancer compared with open liver resection, but evidence on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still insufficient. The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival for a large series of patients treated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by open or laparoscopic approach. Secondary objectives were to compare disease-free survival, predictors of death, and recurrence.Patients treated with laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2018 from 3 large international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient in the laparoscopic resection group (case) was matched with 1 open resection control (1:1 ratio), through a propensity score calculated on clinically relevant preoperative covariates. Overall and disease-free survival were compared between the matched groups. Predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression, and the Textbook Outcomes were described.During the study period, 855 patients met the inclusion criteria (open liver resection = 709, 82.9%; laparoscopic liver resection = 146, 17.1%). Two groups of 89 patients each were analyzed after propensity score matching, with no significant difference regarding pre- and postoperative variables. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92%, 75%, and 63% in the laparoscopic liver resection group versus 92%, 58%, and 49% in the open liver resection group (P = .0043). Adjusted Cox regression revealed severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 10.5, 95% confidence interval [1.01-109] P = .049) and steatosis (hazard ratio: 13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.23-154] P = .033) as predictors of death, and transfusion (hazard ratio: 19.2, 95% confidence interval [4.04-91.4] P.001) and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [1.15-14.4] P = .030) as predictors of recurrence.The survival advantage of laparoscopic liver resection over open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is equivocal, given historical bias and missing data.

1099 Background: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a lethal disease and is generally only amenable to systemic treatment. Although increasingly recommended on selected patients, local treatments, and particularly surgery, are seldom used in the therapeutic armamentarium for MBC and their long-term survival benefit is unknown. We hypothesized that combining surgery to systemic treatment for selected patients with breast cancer liver metastases could lead to long-term survival or even an option of cure. Methods: A retrospective study of prospectively gathered data from a surgical series of liver resections for MBC was conducted. Patients with no or limited and stable extra-hepatic disease were offered surgery after multidisciplinary discussion, if the liver metastases were responding to systemic treatment and were amenable to complete macroscopic resection. Five- and ten-year actual survivors were identified and their characteristics were explored. Results: From 1984 to 2020, 207 female patients underwent liver resections for MBC in our institution. There was no postoperative mortality. Postoperative complication rate was 23.3% and liver-specific complication rate was 19.0%. There was a total of 48 repeat hepatectomies. Median disease-free interval between initial breast cancer and liver metastasis was 36 ± 90.1 months. There was a median of 2 ± 1.8 liver metastases at diagnosis with a median size of 33.0 ± 18.3 mm and 73.1% of patients had radiological response before resection. Five- and ten-year overall survivals (OS) as well as 5- and 10-year disease-free survivals (DFS) were 39.6% and 12.7% as well as 14.2% and 6.4%, respectively. Median OS was 44.0 ± 47.2 months in the whole series. Focusing on the 5- and 10-year survivors, median OS were 89.5 ± 44.7 months and 144.0 ±42.6 months, respectively. In the 10-year survivors’ group, median DFS was 98 ±62.3 months. Observed survivals in this study underestimate true actual survivals owing to censoring of patients lost to follow-up. Conclusions: Long-term survival (≥ 5 years) as well as a curative perspective (≥ 10 years survival) are achievable for selected patients with breast cancer liver metastases by combining surgery to systemic treatment. Considering the recent improvements in the results of systemic treatments, introducing surgical resection in the treatment sequences of MBC could play an even more beneficial role.

Postoperative early recurrence after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a challenge to surgeons, and the effect of a surgical margin is still controversial. This study aimed to identify an ideal margin to prevent early recurrence.A total of 226 consecutive patients who underwent primary curative hepatic resection for solitary and primary HCC were enrolled. The definition of early recurrence was determined using the minimum P value approach. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors of early recurrence. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the optimal cut-off of the surgical margin and early recurrence.Recurrence within 8 months induced the poorest overall survival (P = 2×10A7-mm margin is important to prevent early recurrence. Patients with HCC and alpha-fetoprotein levels100 ng/ml, non-capsule formation, or microvascular invasion may have a survival benefit from a ≥ 7-mm margin.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is currently the first indication of liver transplantation (LT) in Europe and Asia-Pacific region and the third in the United States. HCC recurrence is the main complication affecting short- and medium-term outcomes after LT.A total of 433 consecutive adult recipients transplanted for HCC between 2000 and 2017 (mean age: 57.8 ± 8.5 y; 83.8% were males) with a mean follow-up of 74.6 ± 58.6 months were included. Patients had to meet Milan criteria and, since 2014, alpha-fetoprotein score to be listed. Patients with HCC recurrence were classified into early (≤2 y) and late recurrence (2 y) and were retrospectively reviewed.Patients who developed recurrence (75 patients, 17%) had more tumors outside Milan and University of California San Francisco criteria, high alpha-fetoprotein score, and microvascular invasion at pathology. Early recurrence developed in 46 patients (61.3%); the overall 5- and 10-year survival rates of these patients from time of LT were 6.7% and 0%, which were significantly lower than those with late recurrence 64.0% and 27.1%, respectively (P0.001). The median survival times from the diagnosis of HCC recurrence were 15 and 17 months, respectively, in the 2 groups (P0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified alcoholic cirrhosis as etiology of the underlying liver disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.074; P = 0.007), bilobar tumor at time of LT (HR = 2.001; P = 0.037), and a tumor size (50 mm) in the explant (HR = 1.277; P = 0.045) as independent predictors of early recurrence.Improving the prediction of early HCC recurrence could optimize patient selection for LT, potential adjuvant therapy with new targeted drugs and hence, improve long-term survival.

Highlight Laparoscopic hepatectomy has become commonly used worldwide and laparoscopic right hepatic mobilization is an important step for right sided liver resection. While the technique has been refined, it remains technically challenging. Ielpo and colleagues present a standardized and reproducible technique for safe mobilization including technical steps and video.

Background FOLFIRINOX is a pillar first-line regimen in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Historically, biliary tract cancer (BTC) and pancreatic cancer have been treated similarly with gemcitabine alone or combined with a platinum compound. With growing evidence supporting the role of fluoropyrimidines in the treatment of BTC, we aimed at assessing the outcomes of patients (pts) with BTC on frontline FOLFIRINOX. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of all our consecutive patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) BTC who were registered to receive FOLFIRINOX as a first-line therapy between 12/2013 and 11/2017 at Paul Brousse university hospital. The main endpoints were Overall Survival (OS), Time-to-Progression (TTP), best Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control rate (DCR), secondary macroscopically-complete resection (res) and incidence of severe (grade 3–4) toxicity (tox). Results There were 17 male (40%) and 25 female (60%) pts. aged 36 to 84 years (median: 67). They had PS of 0 (55%) or 1 (45%), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (21 pts., 50%), gallbladder carcinoma (8 pts., 19%), perihilar CCA (7 pts., 17%), distal CCA (4 pts., 10%) and ampulloma (2 pts., 5%). BTC was LA or M in 10 (24%) and 32 pts. (76%) respectively. Biliary stent was placed in 14 pts. (33%). A median of 10 courses was given with median treatment duration of 6 months. There were no untoward toxicity issues, with no febrile neutropenia, emergency admission for toxicity or toxic death. We observed 12 partial responses (29%) and 19 disease stabilisations (45%). Six patients (14%) underwent secondary R0-R1 resection. Median TTP was 8 months [95%CL, 6–10] and median OS was 15 months [13–17]. Patients undergoing secondary resection displayed a 3-y disease-free rate of 83%. Conclusions First-line FOLFIRINOX offers promising results in patients with LA and M-BTC. It deserves prospective evaluation to further improve outcomes for advanced BTC.

Background The relevance of laparoscopic resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains debated. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic (LLR) and open (OLR) liver resection for ICC, with specific focus on textbook outcome and lymph node dissection (LND). Methods Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for ICC were included from two French, nationwide hepatopancreatobiliary surveys undertaken between 2000 and 2017. Patients with negative margins, and without transfusion, severe complications, prolonged hospital stay, readmission or death were considered to have a textbook outcome. Patients who achieved both a textbook outcome and LND were deemed to have an adjusted textbook outcome. OLR and LLR were compared after propensity score matching. Results In total, 548 patients with ICC (127 LLR, 421 OLR) were included. Textbook-outcome and LND completion rates were 22.1 and 48.2 per cent respectively. LLR was independently associated with a decreased rate of LND (odds ratio 0.37, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.69). After matching, 109 patients remained in each group. LLR was associated with a decreased rate of transfusion (7.3 versus 21.1 per cent; P = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (median 7 versus 14 days; P = 0.001), but lower rate of LND (33.9 versus 73.4 per cent; P = 0.001). Patients who underwent LLR had lower rate of adjusted TO completion than patients who had OLR (6.5 versus 17.4 per cent; P = 0.012). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach did not substantially improve quality of care of patients with resectable ICC.

Background & Aims Herein, we aimed to establish benchmark values – based on a composite indicator of healthcare quality – for the performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) and laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) using data from expert centers. Methods Data from a nationwide multicenter survey including all patients undergoing LLLS and LRH between 2000 and 2017 were analyzed. Textbook outcome (TO) completion was considered in patients fulfilling all 6 of the following characteristics: negative margins, no transfusion, no complication, no prolonged hospital stay, no readmission and no mortality. For each procedure, a cut-off laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) volume by center was associated with TO on multivariable analysis. These cut-offs defined the expert centers. The benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median outcomes among these expert centers. Results Among 4,400 LLRs performed in 29 centers, 855 patients who underwent LLLS and 488 who underwent LRH were identified. The overall incidences of TO after LLLS and LRH were 43.7% and 23.8%, respectively. LLR volume cut-offs of 25 LLR/year (odds ratio [OR] 2.45; bootstrap 95% CI 1.65–3.69; p = 0.001) and 35 LLR/year (OR 2.55; bootstrap 95% CI 1.34–5.63; p = 0.003) were independently associated with completion of TO after LLLS and LRH, respectively. Eight centers for LLLS and 6 centers for LRH, including 516 and 346 patients undergoing LLLS/LRH respectively, reached these cut-offs and were identified as expert centers. After LLLS, benchmark values of severe complication, mortality and TO completion were defined as ≤5.3%, ≤1.2% and ≥46.6%, respectively. After LRH, benchmark values of severe complication, mortality and TO completion were ≤20.4%, ≤2.8% and ≥24.2%, respectively. Conclusions This study provides an up-to-date reference on the benchmark performance of LLLS and LRH in expert centers. Lay summary In a nationwide French survey of laparoscopic liver resection, expert centers were defined according to the completion of a textbook outcome, which is a composite indicator of healthcare quality. Benchmark values regarding intra-operative details and outcomes were established using data from 516 patients with laparoscopic left lateral sectionectiomy and 346 patients with laparoscopic right hepatectomy from expert centers. These values should be used as a reference point to improve the quality of laparoscopic resections.

Background Portal vein embolization (PVE) use is nowadays debated due to the risk of technical or biological unresectability after the period of time needed to achieve future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of PVE in a single high-volume hepatobiliary center, with emphasis in the feasibility to achieve tumor resection. Methods Patients undergoing PVE before major hepatectomy at our institution between 1993 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Results A total of 431 patients formed the study population. Morbidity and mortality rates of PVE were 16.7% and 0.2% respectively. Morbidity was similar between percutaneous and ileocolic approaches or between histoacryl and ethanol as embolization materials (P > 0.05). On the contrary, the percutaneous ipsilateral approach was associated with significantly less complications than the contralateral approach (10.3% vs 19.4%; P = 0.024). Almost all patients (96%) achieved sufficient FLR volume after embolization, but only 66% finally underwent planned liver resection. Disease progression was the most common cause of unresectability (67%). Patients with extrahepatic biliary tumors experienced significantly higher unresectability rates compared to other entities (45.1% vs 31.4%; P = 0.019). Conclusion PVE was not followed by hepatectomy in 34% of our patients. Biliary tumors displayed the higher dropout rates after PVE and the higher chances of tumor progression preventing curative resection. Although PVE may be performed with acceptable morbidity, PVE-related complications prevented curative resection in 5% of patients. Careful multidisciplinary selection is crucial to avoid PVE overuse in technically resectable patients who will experience a not negligible risk of futile use and non-therapeutic laparotomy.

Surgical resection is an established therapeutic strategy for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis. However, controversies exist when CRC liver and lung metastases (CLLMs) are found concomitantly or when recurrence develops after either liver or lung resection. No predictive score model is available to risk stratify these patients in preparation for surgery, and cure has not yet been reported.All consecutive patients who had undergone surgery for CLLMs at our institution during a 20-year period were reviewed. Our policy was to propose sequential surgery of both sites with perioperative chemotherapy, if the strategy was potentially curative. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and cure were evaluated.Sequential resection was performed in 150 patients with CLLMs. The median number of liver and lung metastases resected was 3 and 1, respectively. The median follow-up period was 59 months (range, 7-274 months). The median, 5-year, and 10-year overall survival was 76 months, 60%, and 35% respectively. CRC that was metastatic at the initial diagnosis (P = .012), a prelung resection carcinoembryonic antigen level100 ng/mL (P = .014), a prelung resection cancer antigen 19-9 level37 U/mL (P = .034), and an interval between liver and lung resection of 24 months (P = .024) were independent poor prognostic factors for survival. The 5-year survival was significantly different for patients with ≤ 2 and ≥ 3 risk factors (77.3% vs. 26.5%). Of 75 patients with ≥ 5 years of follow-up data available from the first metastasis resection, 15 (20%) with disease-free survival ≥ 5 years were considered cured. The use of targeted therapy was the only independent predictor of cure.Curative-intent surgery provides good long-term survival and offers a chance of cure in select patients. Patients with ≤ 2 risk factors are good candidates for sequential resection.

Vascular complications following liver transplantation (LT) may result from technical deficiencies. Intraoperative diagnosis remains challenging but can prevent serious delayed complications. Intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography (IOUS) represents the gold standard for imaging, although it requires radiological skills. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has been reported during postoperative assessments, but never intraoperatively (CE-IOUS). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of routine CE-IOUS, to evaluate its impact on surgical strategy and its usefulness. All 553 whole LTs performed in our tertiary centre between 01/2010 and 12/2014 were reviewed. We compared perioperative outcomes and long-term survival in IOUS (n = 370) versus CE-IOUS (n = 103) groups. Secondarily, the seven cases where the two imaging findings conflicted (CE+ Group) were matched 1:2 and compared with an exclusively IOUS procedure (CE− Group, n = 14) to assess the consequences of a specific CE-guided strategy. CE-IOUS assessments were successful in 100% of cases, without any adverse effects. Vascular complications and patient/graft survival rates were identical in the IOUS and CE-IOUS groups (p = 0.65, 0.95 and 0.86, respectively). CE-IOUS confirmed IOUS findings in 93% of cases (n = 96) and led to the realization of an additional procedure (median arcuate ligament lysis) and six conservative strategies despite poor arterial (n = 5) or venous flow (n = 1) under Doppler analysis. The CE+ and CE− groups presented statistically identical perioperative and long-term outcomes. This study demonstrated the feasibility of CE-IOUS during whole LT. However, we failed to demonstrate any advantages of CE-IOUS over IOUS. Therefore, IOUS currently remains the gold-standard imaging technique for the intraoperative assessment of vascular patency.

Although sarcopenia is a common complication of cirrhosis, its diagnosis remains nonconsensual: computed tomography (CT) scan determinations vary and no cutoff values have been established in cirrhotic populations undergoing liver transplantation (LT). Our aim was to compare the accuracy of the most widely used measurement techniques and to establish useful cutoffs in the setting of LT. From the 440 patients transplanted between January 2008 and May 2011 in our tertiary center, we selected 256 patients with cirrhosis for whom a recent CT scan was available during the 4 months prior to LT. We measured different muscle indexes: psoas muscle area (PMA), PMA normalized by height or body surface area (BSA), and the third lumbar vertebra skeletal muscle index (L3SMI). Receiver operating characteristic curves were evaluated and prognostic factors for post-LT 1-year survival were then analyzed. PMA offered better accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.753) than L3SMI (AUC = 0.707) and PMA/BSA (AUC = 0.732), and the same accuracy as PMA/squared height. So, for its accuracy and simplicity of use, the PMA index was used for the remainder of the analysis and to define sarcopenia. In men, the better cutoff value for PMA was 1561 mm2 (Se = 94%, Sp = 57%), whereas in women, it was 1464 mm2 (Se = 52%, Sp = 91%). A PMA lower than these values defined sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis awaiting LT. One- and 5-year overall survival rates were significantly poorer in the sarcopenic group (n = 57) than in the nonsarcopenic group (n = 199), at 59% versus 94% and 54% versus 80%, respectively (P

Although efficient chemotherapy regimens have improved outcomes after R1 resection (positive margins) for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs), the long-term survival benefit and potential for cure after R1 resection have not been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome after R1 resection for CLM, and to identify factors predictive of cure. All resected CLM patients at our institution from 2000 to 2009 were prospectively evaluated. Cure was defined as a disease-free interval ≥5 years from the last hepatic or extrahepatic resection to last follow-up. Of 628 patients consecutively resected for CLM, 428 were eligible for the study, of whom 219 (51 %) underwent R0 resection (negative margins) and 209 (49 %) underwent R1 resection. Overall, 130 patients with R0 resection and 141 patients with R1 resection had more than 5 years of follow-up. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates were 56 and 34 % for R0 patients, and 48 and 36 % for R1 patients, respectively (p = 0.37). Of the 141 patients who underwent R1 resection, 26 patients (18 %) were considered ‘cured’, and 106 patients (75 %) were considered ‘noncured’. Independent predictive factors of cure after R1 resection included ≤10 total cycles of preoperative chemotherapy and objective response to preoperative chemotherapy. Overall, potential cure can be achieved in 18 % of patients after R1 resection for CLM. The best conditions to achieve long-term survival after R1 resection rely on a good response to efficient and short first-line chemotherapy.

Background Management of portal inflow to the graft in patients with spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SRS) is a matter of concern especially in case of large varices (more than 1 cm). In case of portal vein (PV) thrombosis (PVT), renoportal anastomosis (RPA) directly diverts the splanchnic and renal venous blood assuring a good portal inflow to the graft. Disconnection of the portacaval shunt by left renal vein ligation (LRVL) is another option but requires a patent PV. The indication of primary RPA rather than LRVL in patients with small native PV, especially in case of large graft, should be questioned in these complex cases of liver transplantation. Methods From 1998 to 2012, 17 patients with RPA and 15 patients with LRVL were transplanted in our center. We compared these 2 techniques for short- and long-term results. Results The rate of preliver transplantation PVT (76% vs 27%) and graft weight (1538 ± 383 g vs 1293 ± 216 g) was significantly higher in the RPA group. Renoportal anastomosis was performed in 4 cases of small but patent PV. Three-month mortality, morbidity, and massive ascitis were similar. No patient was retransplanted. One year after transplantation, PV diameter was still larger in RPA group. Three-year survival was similar (RPA: 79% vs LRVL: 53%, P = 0.1). Conclusions In cirrhotic patients transplanted with large splenorenal shunts, RPA and LRVL reach similar survivals. In case of complete PVT and failure of thrombectomy, the RPA offers satisfactory long-term results.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the best curative treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. However, the current shortage of organs causes prolonged waiting times and poorer intention-to-treat (ITT) survival (i.e., after listing) owing to tumor progression and dropout. Portal hypertension (PH) is a recognized risk factor of HCC development in patients with cirrhosis and its recurrence after resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of PHT on the results of LT on an ITT basis. Patients with cirrhosis listed for LT for HCC were included and their outcomes after listing were compared according to the presence or absence of PH defined as presence of esophageal varices or ascites or low platelet count and splenomegaly. Among 243 consecutively listed patients, 70% were affected by PH, which was associated with a significantly higher risk of tumor progression (38% vs. 22%; P = 0.017) and a higher risk of dropout (22% vs. 8%; P = 0.01). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was similarly applied to the two groups (60% vs. 67%; P = 0.325). An absence of TACE was the only other independent risk factor of dropout owing to tumor progression. Under an ITT analysis, PH reduced overall survival (OS), but there was no difference in OS and time to recurrence post-LT. The only pathological feature that could potentially explain this observation was the lower complete response to TACE in the PHT group (12% vs. 36%; P = 0.001). Conclusion: PH should be regarded as a major risk factor of dropout owing to tumor progression and should be taken into consideration when managing patients with HCC who are waiting for LT. (Hepatology 2015;62:179-187)

Background Postoperative hepatic decompensation is a serious complication of liver resection in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver fibrosis and clinical significant portal hypertension are well-known risk factors for hepatic decompensation. Liver stiffness measurement is a noninvasive method of evaluating hepatic venous pressure gradient and functional hepatic reserve by estimating hepatic fibrosis. Effectiveness of liver stiffness measurement in predicting persistent postoperative hepatic decompensation has not been investigated. Methods Consecutive patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma were recruited prospectively and liver stiffness measurement of nontumoral liver was measured using FibroScan. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was measured intraoperatively by direct puncture of portal vein and inferior vena cava. Hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mm Hg was defined as clinically significant portal hypertension. Primary outcome was persistent hepatic decompensation defined as the presence of at least one of the following: unresolved ascites, jaundice, and/or encephalopathy >3 months after hepatectomy. Results One hundred and six hepatectomies, including 22 right hepatectomy (20.8%), 3 central hepatectomy (2.8%), 12 left hepatectomy (11.3%), 11 bisegmentectomy (10.4%), 30 unisegmentectomy (28.3%), and 28 partial hepatectomy (26.4%) were performed in patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (84 men and 22 women with median age of 67.5 years; median model for end-stage liver disease score of 8). Ninety-day mortality was 4.7%. Nine patients (8.5%) developed postoperative hepatic decompensation. Multivariate logistic regression bootstrapped at 1,000 identified liver stiffness measurement (P = .001) as the only preoperative predictor of postoperative hepatic decompensation. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve for liver stiffness measurement and hepatic venous pressure gradient was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.506–0.907) and 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.646–0.917), respectively. Liver stiffness measurement ≥22 kPa had 42.9% sensitivity and 92.6% specificity and hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mm Hg had 28.6% sensitivity and 96.3% specificity. Conclusion In selected patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, transient elastography is an easy and effective test to predict persistent hepatic decompensation preoperatively.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to identify factors that predict the failure of a ‘no drain’ policy in laparoscopic hepatectomy.MethodsSurgical outcomes in 342 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy were reviewed. Drains were placed only for the following predefined criteria: (i) intraoperative bile leak; (ii) bilioenteric anastomosis, and (iii) increased risk for postoperative bleeding (‘no drain’ policy). Factors leading to need for postoperative drainage or reoperation were evaluated.ResultsDrains were placed in 44 patients (drainage group). Postoperatively, additional procedures were required in five (11.4%) patients in the drainage group and in 18 (6.0%) patients in the no-drainage group. Multivariate analysis suggested that blood loss of >400ml [odds ratio (OR) 4.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41–14.2; P = 0.010] and preoperative chemotherapy (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 0.82–6.48; P = 0.120) may increase the risk for need for postoperative procedures when intraoperative prophylactic drainage is not used.ConclusionsProphylactic drainage during liver resection should be considered not only in the presence of uncontrollable bile leak or concern for postoperative bleeding risk, but also in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those in whom intraoperative blood loss is >400ml. Otherwise, a ‘no drain’ policy is safe and would enhance the advantages of minimally invasive liver surgery.

Size matching between recipient and donor livers is an important factor in organ allocation in the context of liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to determine whether a large graft for recipient size influenced the post-transplant course. One hundred and sixty-two successive LT recipients were included and retrospectively divided into two groups: 25 (15%) had a graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GWRW) ≥ 2.5% and 137 (85%) had a GWRW2.5%. Postoperative complications and outcomes were recorded. In the GWRW2.5% group, more end-to-end caval replacement (72% vs. 38%, p = 0.003) and veno-venous bypass (48% vs. 23%, p = 0.01) were used. Peak AST/ALT values were higher in the GWRW2.5% group (AST: 596 [70-5876] vs. 453 [29-5132] IU/l, p = 0.03; ALT: 773 [101-5025] vs. 383 [36-4921] IU/l, p = 0.02). Among postoperative complications, the rate of respiratory failure was higher in the GWRW2.5% group (32% vs. 14%, p = 0.04). The rates of other complications did not differ between the two groups. Both groups had similar graft and patient survival rates at one yr. Using large grafts for recipient size did not impair liver function and did not modify graft and patient outcomes at one yr. However, a GWRW2.5% appeared to be a determining factor for respiratory morbidity following LT.

International audience; OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a parenchymal-sparing strategy provides similar results in terms of morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcome of non-PSH hepatectomies in a propensity score matched population (PSMP) in case of multiple (>3) bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM).BACKGROUND:The surgical treatment of bilobar liver metastasis is challenging due to the necessity to achieve complete resection margins and a sufficient future remnant liver. Two approaches are adaptable as follows: parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies (PSH) and extended hepatectomies (NON-PSH).METHODS:A total of 3036 hepatectomies were analyzed from a multicentric retrospective cohort of hepatectomies. Patients were matched in a 1:1 propensity score analysis in order to compare PSH versus NON-PSH resections.RESULTS:PSH was associated with a lower number of complications (≥1) (25% vs. 34%, p = 0.04) and a lower grade of Dindo-Clavien III and IV (10 vs. 16%, p = 0.03). Liver failure was less present in PSH (2 vs. 7%, p = 0.006), with a shorter ICU stay (0 day vs. 1 day, p = 0.004). No differences were demonstrated in overall and disease-free survival.CONCLUSION:In conclusion, PSH resection for bilobar multiple CLMs represents a valid alternative to NON-PSH resection in selected patients with a reduced morbidity and comparable oncological results.

Background Regenerative nodular hyperplasia (RNH) represents the end-stage of vascular lesions of the liver induced by chemotherapy. The goal was to evaluate its incidence and impact on the outcome of patients resected for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Methods Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CLM after six cycles or more of first-line chemotherapy, between January 1990 and November 2006, were included. Detailed histopathologic analysis of the nontumoral liver was performed according to a standard format. Results From a cohort of 856 resected patients at our institution, 771 (90%) received preoperative chemotherapy. Of these, 146 fulfilled the selection criteria and were included: 24 (16%) received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) alone, 92 (63%) had 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin, 18 (12%) had 5-FU/LV and irinotecan, and 12 (8%) were treated by 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. RNH occurred in 22 of 146 patients (15%). Twenty of these patients (91%) received oxaliplatin, of whom six (30%) had chronomodulated therapy. Patients treated by oxaliplatin more often had RNH compared with oxaliplatin-naïve patients (22 vs. 4%). Although operative mortality was nil, the presence of RNH was associated with increased postoperative hepatic morbidity (50 vs. 29%). Elevated preoperative gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) (>80 U/L; >1N) and total bilirubin levels (>15 μmol/L; >1N) were independent predictors of RNH. Conclusions Patients with CLM who receive preoperative oxaliplatin have an increased risk of RNH and associated postoperative morbidity. Increased serum GGT and bilirubin are useful markers to predict the presence of RNH.

3529Background: Prognostic factors of survival have been extensively reported after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). However, a specific analysis of patients submitted to preoperativ...

e15504Background: Primary tumor location is an important prognostic factor for colorectal cancer, including colorectal liver metastases (CLM). We assessed the implications of primary tumor location...

Hepatic artery stenosis (HAS) is a rare complication of orthotopic liver transplantation (LT). HAS could evolve into complete thrombosis and lead to graft loss, incurring significant morbidity and mortality. Even though endovascular management by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty ± stenting (PTA) is the primary treatment of HAS, its longterm impact on hepatic artery (HA) patency and graft survival remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate longterm outcomes of PTA and to define the risk factors of treatment failure. From 2006 to 2012, 30 patients with critical HAS (>50% stenosis of HA) and treated by PTA were identified from 870 adult patients undergoing LT. Seventeen patients were diagnosed by post-LT screening, and 13 patients were symptomatic due to HAS. PTA was completed successfully in 27 (90%) patients with angioplasty plus stenting in 23 and angioplasty alone in 4. The immediate technical success rate was 90%. A major complication that was observed was arterial dissection (1 patient) which eventually necessitated retransplantation. Restenosis was observed in 10 (33%) patients. One-year, 3-year, and 5-year HA patency rates were 68%, 62.8%, and 62.8%, respectively. Overall patient survival was 93.3% at 3 years and 85.3% at 5 years. The 3-year and 5-year liver graft survival rates were 84.7% and 64.5%, respectively. No significant difference was observed in patient and graft survivals between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients after PTA. Similarly, no difference was observed between angioplasty alone and angioplasty plus stenting. In conclusion, endovascular therapy ensures a good 5-year graft survival (64.5%) and patient survival (85.3%) in patients with critical HAS by maintaining HA patency with a low risk of serious morbidity (3.3%). Liver Transplantation 22 923-933 2016 AASLD.

4079 Background: Microvascular invasion (MVI) is the strongest prognostic factor following surgery of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is usually not available on the preoperative setting. A predictive model of MVI in patients scheduled for hepatic resection (HR) or liver transplantation (LT) would thus help guiding treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for MVI of HCC before either HR or LT. Methods: HCC patients who consecutively performed HR or LT from January 1994 to June 2016 at a single institution were subdivided into a training and validation cohort. Risk factors for MVI in the training cohort were used to develop a predictive model for MVI, to be validated in the validation cohort. The outcomes of the HR and LT patients with high or low MVI probability based on the model, were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Cut-off values for continuous factors were determined based on ROC curve analysis. Results: A total of 910 patients (425 HR, 485 LT) were included in the training (n = 637) and validation (n = 273) cohorts. In the training cohort, multivariate analysis demonstrated that alpha-fetoprotein ≥100ng/ml ( p < 0.0001), largest tumor size ≥40mm ( p = 0.0002), non-boundary HCC type on contrast-enhanced CT ( p = 0.001), neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio ≥3.2 ( p = 0.002), aspartate aminotransferase ≥62U/l ( p = 0.02) were independently associated with MVI. Combinations of these 5 factors varied the MVI probability from 15.5% to 91.1%. This predictive model achieved a good c-index of 0.76 in the validation cohort. In PSM (109 HR, 109 LT), there was no difference in survival between HR and LT patients among the high MVI probability (≥50%) patients, (5y-OS; 46.3% vs 42.2%, p = 0.77, 5y-RFS; 54.0% vs 28.8%, p = 0.21). Among the low probability ( < 50%), survival was significantly decreased following HR compared with LT (5y-OS; 54.1% vs 78.8%, p = 0.007, 5y-RFS; 17.3% vs 86.1%, p< 0.0001). Conclusions: This model developed from preoperative data allows reliable prediction of MVI, and may thus help with preoperative decisions about the suitability of HR or LT in patients with HCC.

3579 Background: Increasingly efficient chemotherapy regimens have improved the outcomes after R1 resection (tumor-free margin < 1 mm) for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). However the long-term s...

3524 Background: Resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) liver or lung metastases is an established therapeutic strategy. However, controversies exist when metastases are found concomitantly in both t...

Today, giant hydatid cysts are fairly rare even in endemic areas. We describe a case of an extremely large hydatid cyst of the liver that was causing massive compression of the neighboring organs, giving rise to a subocclusive syndrome of the intestine. After considering the various approaches available for the treatment of this disease, it was decided that radical surgery was still the best therapeutic choice, especially when extremely large cysts are involved. In particular, in clinical situations where it is difficult to perform radical surgical procedures, less aggressive surgery followed by drug treatment should be the treatment of choice.