Search

Classical literature written in Turkish in social sciences, especially in the fields of theology, such as kalam, tafsir, and mysticism, has only recently begun to receive the attention it deserves. In these areas, which previously focused more on Arabic texts, works with Arabic letters that constitute Turkish literature recently began to be introduced and published. In this direction, the issue of critical publication came to the fore again, and ISAM organized an "Ottoman Turkish Critical Publication Course" for several summers. As a result of this work, Berat Açıl published a guide with the joint effort of Sadık Yazar, Kadir Turgut and Özgür Kavak., Sosyal bilimlerde özellikle kelam, tefsir, tasavvuf gibi ilahiyat fakültelerinin uhdesinde bulunan alanlarda Türkçe yazılmış klasik literatür ancak son zamanlarda hak ettiği ilgiyi görmeye başlamıştır. Bundan önce daha çok Arapça metinlere ağırlık veren bu alanlarda yakın zamanda Türkçe literatürü oluşturan Arap harfli eserler tanıtılmaya ve neşredilmeye başlandı. Bu doğrultuda tenkitli neşir konusu da yeniden gündeme geldi ve İSAM birkaç yaz boyunca “Osmanlı Türkçesi Tenkitli Neşir Kursu” düzenledi. Bu çalışmanın bir sonucu olarak da Berat Açıl, Sadık Yazar, Kadir Turgut ve Özgür Kavak’ın müşterek mesaisiyle bir kılavuz yayımladı.

Bu çalışmada öğrenci ve öğretmenlerin görüşlerine göre ortaöğretim Osmanlı Türkçesi dersi öğretim/öğrenim sürecinde yaşanılan sorunların ve bunlara yönelik çözüm önerilerinin tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden olgubilim (fenomonoloji) deseniyle desenlenmiştir. Veriler 2022-2023 eğitim öğretim yılı birinci yarıyılında yapılandırılmamış (açık uçlu) sorulardan oluşan anket formu ile edinilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler içerik analizi yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma İstanbul ilinin iki farklı ilçesinde bulunan iki Kız Anadolu İmam Hatip Lisesi’nde yürütülmüştür. Çalışma grubu 10. sınıfta Osmanlı Türkçesi dersi almış 166 on birinci sınıf öğrencisi ile bu liselerdeki Osmanlı Türkçesi dersi veren iki öğretmenden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmaya katılan öğrenci ve öğretmenlerin görüşlerine göre Osmanlı Türkçesi dersinde yaşanılan sorunlar ve bu sorunlara yönelik çözüm önerileri kategorilere ayırılarak açıklanmıştır. Öğrenci sorunları daha çok ders süresi, alfabe, ders kitabı ve ders öğretmenine yöneliktir. Öğretmen sorunları ise ders süresi, alfabe ve öğrencilerin ilk başta derse karşı olan olumsuz önyargıları ile ilgilidir. Çalışmanın sonunda ders süresinin artırılması, ders kitaplarının gözden geçirilmesi, öğrencilere yeteri kadar etkinlik yaptırılması gibi ders sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunların giderilmesine yönelik önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

The dictionary of Ahmet Vefik Pasha named Lehçe-i Osmânî (LO) is known in the Ottoman Empire as the first dictionary that compiles the head words from Turkish words and describes their definitions in Turkish. Vefik Pasha succeeded in impressing his contemporary and follower dictionary writers in many ways with his dictionary, which includes many innovations for his period (Toparlı, 2000: VII; Akün, 2003: 128). One of these features is the word muvelled, which is used regularly when defining head words. As in many dictionaries, Vefik Pasha also gives some explanatory information before the definition of the word per item in his dictionary. One of them is that he uses the specifiers he calls ‘muvelled, kelime-i müvellede, lugat-i müvellede’ when deemed necessary. This study shows how Vefik Pasha contributed to the emergence of the muvelledât complex based on the structure in the original text and why he chose this naming; Especially by using LO's contemporary dictionaries, it has been tried to be analyzed. When interpreting the words that are pointed to be considered in the dictionary, we often refer to Kamus-ı Türki (1901); Other dictionaries of the same period were used in some places. In order to determine the existence and status of the words in Arabic, it was consulted to Kamusu'l-Muhit Translation (2013) and the Arabic-Turkish Dictionary (Mutçalı, 1995). Some of the evidence in the dictionary is medicine, physics, etc. are terms belonging to fields. The work named Lugat-ı Tıbbiye (1873) prepared by Cemiyet-i Tıbbiye-i Osmaniye and Dictionnaire Turc-Français (1883) written by Şemseddin Sami for the foreign-language equivalents of medical terms, especially French, became our main sources. Especially the last one is used for terms belonging to other fields. For this purpose, first of all, the referenced muvelled words in LO were compiled from the original text by making use of Paketli (2007) and the volume and page number and orthographies were recorded together. It can be seen more clearly that some words are written in different volumes with the same / different meanings, same / different ways: see. berkan / berḳan / birkan, Beşāret, entāri / ʿanterī etc. Later, these data were processed in the table in the Analysis section. In the review section, the transliteration alphabet was used only in the writing of headwords words. While definitions and explanations are written in the standard alphabet, ain and hamzas in some words are shown to avoid ambiguity. Vefik Pasha sometimes did not write the Shadda sign while he was writing; In the writing of these words, the spelling of Vefik Pasha is adhered to. Under the comment title, the Latin letter head word, root, derivatives and their equivalents in the foreign language are written in italics. It has been observed that the words examined in this way can be classified under four main headings: 1. Muvelled in terms of sound: The interpretation under this heading consists of words that enter OT from other languages but adapt to the phonetic structure of Turkish even a little or differ at the end of the phonological processes within the language. 2. Muvelled in terms of form: The statement under this heading consists of words that result from the operation of that language or other languages with the morphological possibilities without questioning whether any word taken from the source language complies with the rules of the source language. 3. Muvelled in terms of meaning: The interpretation under this heading consists of words that are completely independent of their meaning in the source language or have different meaning content or have undergone intra-linguistic meaning change. 4. Muvelled in terms of orthography: Consists of words with spelling styles that go beyond the general acceptance of the writing of statements under this heading. We can express the results we obtained as a result of the examination as follows: The Arabic infinitive suffix / iyye (t) /, with its function corresponding to the Turkish + lIk suffix, has been widely used in the derivation of new words, regardless of their Arabic origin. However, we can say that the suffix / iyye (t) / is perceived as a Turkish suffix by the Turks and is also used in the derivation of many new Turkish words with figure sampling. Similarly, tef tîl, tefeʿʿul, mufaʿʿal, istifʿâl etc. It is seen that the meter is used like Turkish in deriving a new term. In this respect, the ability to use the possibilities of Arabic language in accordance with Turkish grammar when the need to mark a new concept, produced or imported from abroad, stands out. This situation has consequences that will also affect our view on the galleries, who are often in an affirmation. Because if evaluated as we tried to express above, it can be seen that a word that can be named as Galata according to the Arabic rule does not have a defect as the product of Turkish thought. When looking at pure LO, it is not understood why many item headings are qualified as muvelled. Vefik Pasha must have thought that these were already known. This situation stands out as one of the flaws in the internal order of the dictionary. As a matter of fact, it has been observed that Şemseddin Sami, who is considered the most important follower of Vefik Pasha, filled such gaps by making the necessary explanations in his dictionary: see. ictisār, muṣaʿad, reftiyye, tamamiyet, temhir, tetahhul, zıddiyyet, etc. Since lexicography is also a job of evolving the previous one, it is necessary to draw attention to the contribution of Şemseddin Sami in this direction. The mentioned words that are rarely referred to as müvelled from the source language or intermediary language; Although it was also used in OT, it mostly gained the ability to manage the possibilities of Arabic and Persian, and found a use area as a product of the language / thought activity of the Ottoman Turkish. The recognition and reception of the concept world that emerged with the advances in different disciplines especially in the 19th century by the Ottoman intellectual brought along a process of word derivation peculiar to OT. The citations of branches of science such as medicine, physics, botany, and anatomy are among the most prominent evidences of this.

İstanbul adının Osmanlı Türkçesi döneminde nasıl telaffuz edilmiş olduğu Arapharfli metinlerden değil Latin harflerinin de kullanıldığı, kelimenin ünlü ve ünsüzlerininaçıkça kaydedildiği çeviri yazılı metinler aracılığı ile tespit edilebilir. İstanbul adı Grekçestambóli ~ stembóli(n) ~ stimbóli(n) şekillerinden Osmanlı Türkçesine Stambol şeklindegeçmiş ve Osmanlılar arasında 15 farklı şekilde telaffuz edilmiştir. Bu kadar farklı telaffuzunortaya çıkmasında ön seste ünlünün bulunup bulunmaması, ب harfinden öncekiن’nin durumu ve son hecedeki ünlünün geniş veya dar olarak telaffuz edilmesi belirleyiciolmuştur. Bu makalede 38 çeviri yazılı metinde İstanbul kelimesinin Osmanlı Türkçesiboyunca nasıl telaffuz edilmiş olduğu ve Türkçeleşme süreci incelenmiştir., The way how İstanbul noun was pronounced in Ottoman Turkish period can be detachedthrough transcription texts in which the vowels and consonants of the words wererecorded explicitly in Latin letters, not through the texts written in Arabic script. Thenoun İstanbul transferred form Greek stambóli ~ stembóli(n) ~ stimbóli(n) forms intoOttoman Turkish and was pronounced with 15 different forms by Ottomans. The decisivereason for these different pronunciations are whether there is a vowel in the beginningposition, the situation of ن and ب before pronunciation of the final vowel as roundedor unrounded. In the present article the way how İstanbul noun was pronounced duringOttoman Turkish period and their process of becoming Turkish elements are analyzed in38 transcription texts.

Makale, Osmanlı Türkçesi, 13. ve 20. yüzyıllar arasında Osmanlı coğrafyasında kullanılan Türkçe’ye verilen isimdir. Coğrafî, dinî, siyâsî ve kültürel etkileşim sebebiyle Osmanlı Türkçesi’nde Farsça ve Arapça’nın etkisi belirgin bir şekilde hissedilir. Öyle ki Osmanlı Türkçesi birçokları tarafından Türkçe, Farsça ve Arapça’dan müteşekkil bir dil olarak tanımlanmıştır. Özellikle Osmanlı Türkçesinin Klasik dönemi olarak isimlendirilen, 15. ve 19. yüzyıllar arasındaki dönem bu iddiaları haklı çıkaran dilsel hususiyetler barındırır. Bu durum Osmanlı Türkçesi’nin ne kadar özgün bir dil olduğu konusunu gündeme getirir. Bununla birlikte, Osmanlı Türkçesindeki yoğun Farsça ve Arapça varlığı, bu dilleri meydana getiren medeniyet ve kültür havzalarının bir dil içinde birlikte yaşama tecrübesi olarak karşımıza çıkar. Bu tarihsel tecrübeyi dillerin Osmanlı Türkçesi potası içinde birlikte yaşama tecrübesi olarak isimlendirmek mümkündür.Bu makalede Farsça ve Arapça varlığının Osmanlı Türkçesi potası içinde ne şekilde var olduğu, “Dilde Birlikte Yaşama Tecrübesi” olarak isimlendirdiğimiz tecrübenin hangi sosyal ve tarihsel süreçlerle meydana geldiği, dilde hangi kazanımları ya da müşkül durumları ortaya çıkardığı ele alınmıştır., Ottoman Turkish is the name given to Turkish in the Ottoman geography between the 13th and 20th centuries. Due to geographical, religious, political and cultural interaction, the influence of Persian and Arabic is seen in Ottoman Turkish. The Persian and Arabic presence in Ottoman Turkish is far beyond a simple influence. So much so that Ottoman Turkish is defined as a language consisting of Turkish, Persian and Arabic. The period between the 15th and 19th centuries,which is called the Classical period of Ottoman Turkish in particular, justifies these claims. This situation has led to a debate about how authentic Ottoman Turkish is. The intensive presence of Persian and Arabic in the Ottoman Turkish, however, comes as a reflection of the coexistence of civilizations and cultural havens in a language that brings these languages to life. This experience can be called as the experience of coexistence of these languages under the Ottoman Turkish pot. In this paper, it will be discussed how the experience of Persian and Arabic living under the Ottoman Turkish ladder, in which social processes did this experience emerge as "Experience of coexistence in language", what gains and troubles are revealed.