Search

The wide discrepancies in the frequency of ‘positive’ samples for multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype within the same type of tumor observed in the literature justified the need for the definition of consensus recommendations. To define standard techniques of MDR phenotype measurement, we ran a large multicentric evaluation of the different methods available. Thirty-six French centers participated in the study, and 742 samples of 2–10 × 106 viable cells were sent by overnight express mail between December 1993 and February 1996. The same batches of MRK16, 4E3 and UIC2 were used. Nineteen samples of leukemia (12 AML, 1 ALL, 6 lymphoproliferative syndromes) and six leukemic cell lines with different levels of MDR expression were tested. Five meetings reached agreement concerning the guidelines for each technique, except immunocytochemistry. The 19 fresh samples were tested by each center using one to four techniques among cytofluorometry, immunocytochemistry, functional tests and RT-PCR. Five samples were diagnosed as ‘negative’ according to local criteria, with few discordant results (0 to 16% of ‘positive’ results). For all the 14 remaining samples, large discrepancies were observed from center to center, and from one technique to another. No correlations could be found between techniques. Flow cytometric analysis of cells already exposed to MRK16 or control IgG2A, fixed in paraformaldehyde and sent to centers did not reduce the discrepancies between centers in two of the four samples with moderate expression, emphasizing the role of histogram interpretation. The use of alternative monoclonal antibodies (4E3 and UIC2) did not reduce the discrepancies observed. In a second step, the K562 parental cell line, a low resistant subline (K562/HHT100, ×7 resistance index to DNR) and a high resistant subline (K562/HHT300, ×125 resistance index to DNR) were sent blindly three times, with an increasing level of recommendations for flow cytometry. Dramatic improvements were observed in cytometric results when the result was expressed as the ratio of arithmetic mean of fluorescence of antibody (10 μg of MRK16)/arithmetic mean of fluorescence of control (10 μ g IgG2A): the proportion of expected results increased from 61 to 100% for K562, and from 37 to 85% for K562/HHT100. For uptake and drug efflux measurements, the use of 1 h uptake of 0.1μ M of rhodamine, followed by 1 h efflux ±10 μ M of verapamil, permitted an increased reproducibility of the technique from 71 to 100% for K562 and K562/HHT100. Whatever the technique used, concordant results were obtained for K562/HHT300. The immunocytochemistry, using several antibodies (MRK16, JSB1 and C219) gave many non-interpretable results (44%), due to a frequent high background and discordant results between antibodies in the same centers, and discordant conclusions between centers. The group does not recommend this technique for circulating tumoral cells.

The wide discrepancies in the frequency of 'positive' samples for multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype within the same type of tumor observed in the literature justified the need for the definition of consensus recommendations. To define standard techniques of MDR phenotype measurement, we ran a large multicentric evaluation of the different methods available. Thirty-six French centers participated in the study, and 742 samples of 2-10 x 10(6) viable cells were sent by overnight express mail between December 1993 and February 1996. The same batches of MRK16, 4E3 and UIC2 were used. Nineteen samples of leukemia (12 AML, 1 ALL, 6 lymphoproliferative syndromes) and six leukemic cell lines with different levels of MDR expression were tested. Five meetings reached agreement concerning the guidelines for each technique, except immunocytochemistry. The 19 fresh samples were tested by each center using one to four techniques among cytofluorometry, immunocytochemistry, functional tests and RT-PCR. Five samples were diagnosed as 'negative' according to local criteria, with few discordant results (0 to 16% of 'positive' results). For all the 14 remaining samples, large discrepancies were observed from center to center, and from one technique to another. No correlations could be found between techniques. Flow cytometric analysis of cells already exposed to MRK16 or control IgG2A, fixed in paraformaldehyde and sent to centers did not reduce the discrepancies between centers in two of the four samples with moderate expression, emphasizing the role of histogram interpretation. The use of alternative monoclonal antibodies (4E3 and UIC2) did not reduce the discrepancies observed. In a second step, the K562 parental cell line, a low resistant subline (K562/HHT100, x7 resistance index to DNR) and a high resistant subline (K562/HHT300, x125 resistance index to DNR) were sent blindly three times, with an increasing level of recommendations for flow cytometry. Dramatic improvements were observed in cytometric results when the result was expressed as the ratio of arithmetic mean of fluorescence of antibody (10 microg of MRK16)/arithmetic mean of fluorescence of control (10 microg IgG2A): the proportion of expected results increased from 61 to 100% for K562, and from 37 to 85% for K562/HHT100. For uptake and drug efflux measurements, the use of 1 h uptake of 0.1 microM of rhodamine, followed by 1 h efflux +/-10 microM of verapamil, permitted an increased reproducibility of the technique from 71 to 100% for K562 and K562/HHT100. Whatever the technique used, concordant results were obtained for K562/HHT300. The immunocytochemistry, using several antibodies (MRK16, JSB1 and C219) gave many non-interpretable results (44%), due to a frequent high background and discordant results between antibodies in the same centers, and discordant conclusions between centers. The group does not recommend this technique for circulating tumoral cells.

Since there is no consensus on the techniques for multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype evaluation, many discrepancies concerning the importance and frequency of mdr1 gene expression in leukemias and solid tumors are observed in the literature. In order to establish an inter-laboratory consensus in France, a multicenter study was carried out to propose further guidelines for MDR phenotype evaluation. The techniques used by the 38 laboratories participating in the trial were: immunodetection (immunohisto and/or cytochemistry, flow cytometry), functional tests, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or Northern blot. We present the results obtained by 19 laboratories concerning the measurement of mdr1 gene expression assessed by RT-PCR or Northern blot in: (1)19 samples of tumor cells obtained from leukemic patients; (2) six solid tumor samples obtained at surgery; (3) eight cell lines exhibiting variable levels of resistance, and; (4)10 preparations of RNA and of cDNA obtained from solid tumors. Standardization of the RT-PCR technique and preliminary results comparing RT-PCR with immunohistochemistry in solid tumors are also reported.

We demonstrated previously that sera from quinine-treated patients reversed the MDR phenotype in vitro. Then, the combination of quinine with mitoxantrone (MTX) and cytarabine (Ara-C) was shown to be well-tolerated in patients with acute leukemias. To answer the question whether the response rate could be improved by quinine, we designed a phase III multicentric study. During the first year, the trial involved 112 adult patients (age 18–65y) with either relapsed or refractory acute myeloblastic or lymphoblastic leukemia or secondary leukemia or blastic transformation of myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative syndrome. All patients were treated with a combination of MTX (12 mg/m2/day — 4 days) and Ara-C (1 g/m2/12h — 5 days — 3 hrs iv infusion). After randomisation, 55 patients also received quinine (30 mg/kg/d — 5 days — beginning 24 hrs before MTX infusion). A 20% dose decrease was necessary in 14 patients due to vertigo or tinnitus and quinine was discontinued in 1 patient, due to excessive QT extension The remaining 57 patients received the chemotherapy alone. Toxic death was observed in 2 patients (one in each group) and ten patients (7 in quinine-treated group) died in aplasia before day 30. Response was assessable in 106 patients. As compared with the patients treated with MTX-Ara-C only, the patients treated with MTX-Ara-C plus quinine had a higher overall rate of response [29 / 52 (56%) versus 26 / 54 (48%)]. However, this difference is not significant. Quinine increased the duration of neutropenia (28,3 vs 23,9 days; p < 0.05) and thrombopenia (35 vs 28,3; p = 0.02). The incidence of nausea, vomiting and mucositis was also significantly higher in the quinine-treated group. This partial analysis confirmed the feasibility of using quinine in combination with MTX and Ara-C and suggested a trends for quinine to improve the response rate although these results have to be confirmed by the extended study.

We have previously suggested that quinine and cinchonine could be good candidates for the clinical circumvention of multidrug resistance (MDR) in haematological malignancies because of their tolerance and their retained efficacy in serum. We have also shown that cinchonine was more efficient than quinine as an anti-MDR agent in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo after parenteral administration. Here, we report that cinchonine administered per os (po) is much more active than quinine po in circumventing MDR in rats bearing resistant colon tumours. The pharmacokinetics of cinchonine and quinine administered po in rat are shown to be very different. Cinchonine demonstrates a greater absolute bioavailability than quinine (44% versus 30%, respectively). Its serum concentration correlates with the anti-MDR activity measured ex vivo and in vivo. Cinchonine administered po does not significantly modify the pharmacokinetics of intravenous doxorubicin (DXR). However, cinchonine induces a significant increase of DXR uptake in organs which express the mdr1 gene (liver, kidney, lung). When associated with VAD (vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone) combined therapy in rats, cinchonine does not significantly increase the toxicity of the cytotoxic drugs. Based on these experimental data, a phase I clinical trial is currently in progress to test the tolerance of this potent MDR-reversing agent administered po.

Since liposomes are slowly resorbed from serous cavities, they may constitute a valuable tool for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. We prepared mitoxantrone (MXN)-liposomes with various lipid compositions and checked their antitumoral activity on a peritoneal carcinomatosis induced by a colon cancer cell injection (1 x 10(5) C51 cells) in BALB/c mice. MXN entrapment in liposomes was rapid and stable due to its high lipophilicity. MXN carried in phosphatidylcholine: cholesterol (2:1; G-liposomes) displayed a reduced toxicity in mice compared to the free drug. When tested at a non-toxic dose (2 mg/kg), MXN entrapped in G-liposomes proved to be as efficient as the free drug. At a higher MXN dose (3 mg/kg), both G-liposomes and phosphatidylcholine:cholesterol:dipalmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine (7:2:1) liposomes, loaded with MXN, significantly increased the life span of mice compared to the free drug and six other liposome formulations. Increase in the MXN therapeutic index, when used in the liposomal form, could then merit further clinical investigations in regard to patients with malignancies confined to serous cavities.

Two colon cancer cell lines, HT-29 (human) and DHD/K12/TRb (rat), were grown as monolayer cultures to various confluence degrees. The cytotoxic efficacies of doxorubicin and 4'-deoxydoxorubicin, evaluated by a survival assay, and the nuclear drug concentrations, measured by microspectrofluorometry, were shown to progressively decrease with the augmentation of confluence. This confluence dependent resistance (CDR) to anthracyclines was demonstrated independent of the multidrug resistance drug efflux mechanism. The cellular uptake of three compounds (sodium [51Cr]chromate, D-[14C]alanine, L-[14C]glucose) known to passively diffuse across the cell membrane as anthracyclines do was also reduced in confluent cells. After trypsin cell detachment, the kinetics of reversion of the sodium [51Cr]chromate uptake decrease and that of CDR were similar. Therefore, CDR may be attributed to a reduction of anthracycline cell intake due to a general alteration of passive diffusion across the cell membrane. However, CDR is only partly explained by this phenomenon since a reduced sensitivity of confluent cells was observed compared with nonconfluent cells for a similar amount of drug in their nuclei. CDR could explain the high resistance to anthracyclines of some solid tumors, such as colon tumors, in which cancer cells are tightly aggregated.

International audience; Multidrug-resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1) is a human ATP-binding cassette transporter that confers cell resistance to antitumour drugs. Its NBDs (nucleotide-binding domains) bind/hydrolyse ATP, a key step in the activation of MRP1 function. To relate its intrinsic functional features to the mechanism of action of the full-size transporter, we expressed the N-terminal NBD1 domain (Asn(642) to Ser(871)) in Escherichia coli. NBD1 was highly purified under native conditions and was characterized as a soluble monomer. (15)N-labelling allowed recording of the first two-dimensional NMR spectra of this domain. The NMR study showed that NBD1 was folded, and that Trp(653) was a key residue in the NBD1-ATP interaction. Thus, interaction of NBD1 with ATP/ADP was studied by intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence. The affinity for ATP and ADP were in the same range (K (d(ATP))=118 microM and K (d(ADP))=139 microM). Binding of nucleotides did not influence the monomeric state of NBD1. The ATPase activity of NBD1 was magnesium-dependent and very low [V (max) and K (m) values of 5x10(-5) pmol of ATP x (pmol NBD1)(-1) x s(-1) and 833 microM ATP respectively]. The present study suggests that NBD1 has a low contribution to the ATPase activity of full-length MRP1 and/or that this activity requires NBD1-NBD2 heterodimer formation.