Search

Tumor and target volume manual delineation remains a challenging task in head and neck cancer radiation therapy. The purpose of this study was to conduct a multi-institutional evaluation of manual delineations of gross tumor volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target volume (CTV), parotids, and submandibular glands on treatment simulation magnetic resonance scans of patients with oropharyngeal cancer.We retrospectively collected pretreatment T1-weighted, T1-weighted with gadolinium contrast, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans for 4 patients with oropharyngeal cancer under an institution review board-approved protocol. We provided the scans to 26 radiation oncologists from 7 international cancer centers that participated in this delineation study. We also provide the patients' clinical history and physical examination findings, along with a medical photographic image and radiologic results. We used both the Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation algorithm and pair-wise comparisons of the contours, using overlap/distance metrics. Lastly, to assess experience and CTV delineation institutional practices, we had participants complete a brief questionnaire.Large variability was measured between observers' delineations for GTVs and CTVs. The mean Dice similarity coefficient values across all physicians' delineations for GTVp, GTVn, CTVp, and CTVn were 0.77, 0.67, 0.77, and 0.69, respectively, for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation algorithm comparison, and 0.67, 0.60, 0.67, and 0.58, respectively, for pair-wise analysis. Normal tissue contours were defined more consistently when considering overlap/distance metrics. The median radiation oncology clinical experience was 7 years. The median experience delineating on magnetic resonance imaging was 3.5 years. The GTV-to-CTV margin used was 10 mm for 6 of 7 participant institutions. One institution used 8 mm, and 3 participants (from 3 different institutions) used a margin of 5 mm.The data from this study suggests that appropriate guidelines, contouring quality assurance sessions, and training are still needed for the adoption of magnetic resonance-based treatment planning for head and neck cancers. Such efforts should play a critical role in reducing delineation variation and ensure standardization of target design across clinical practices.

Background: Validation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and development of guidelines for the delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) is of utmost importance to benefit from the visibility of anatomical details on MR images and to achieve an accurate GTV delineation. In the ideal situation, the GTV delineation corresponds to the histopathologically determined ‘true tumor volume’. Consequently, we developed guidelines for GTV delineation of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal tumors on MRI and determined the accuracy of the resulting delineation of the tumor outline on histopathology as gold standard. Material and methods: Twenty-seven patients with T3 or T4 laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer underwent a MRI scan before laryngectomy. Hematoxylin and eosin sections were obtained from surgical specimens and tumor was delineated by one pathologist. GTV was delineated on MR images by three independent observers in two sessions. The first session (del1) was performed according to clinical practice. In the second session (del2) guidelines were used. The reconstructed specimen was registered to the MR images for comparison of the delineated GTVs to the tumor on histopathology. Volumes and overlap parameters were analyzed. A target margin needed to assure tumor coverage was determined. Results: The median GTVs (del1: 19.4 cm3, del2: 15.8 cm3) were larger than the tumor volume on pathology (10.5 cm3). Comparable target margins were needed for both delineation sessions to assure tumor coverage. By adding these margins to the GTVs, the target volumes for del1 (median: 81.3 cm3) were significantly larger than for del2 (median: 64.2 cm3) (p ≤ 0.0001) with similar tumor coverage. Conclusions: In clinical radiotherapy practice, the delineated GTV on MRI is twice as large as the tumor volume. Validated delineation guidelines lead to a significant decrease in the overestimation of the tumor volume.