Search

Background and Objectives: The definitive treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) requires a radical surgical removal of the tumor, which often leads to large soft tissue defects. When they are located in the limbs, significant damage to the lymphatic pathways is not uncommon. In the present article, we present different techniques aimed at both reconstructing the defect and restoring sufficient lymph drainage, thus preventing short- and long-term lymphatic complications. Materials and Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, 10 patients presenting a soft tissue defect with lymphatic impairment received a locoregional reconstruction by means of either pedicled or free SCIP flap. Seven patients required a second flap to reach a good dead space obliteration. In six cases, we performed an interpositional flap, namely a soft tissue transfer with lymphatic tissue preservation, and in four cases a lymphatic flow-through flap. In all cases, the cause of the defect was STS surgical excision. The average age was 60.5 years old (ranging 39–84), seven patients were females and six were males. Results: All the patients were successfully treated. In two cases, minor post-operative complications were encountered (infected seroma), which were conservatively managed. No secondary procedures were required. The average follow-up was 8.9 months (ranging 7–12 months). No signs of lymphedema were reported during this time. In all cases, complete range of motion (ROM) and a good cosmetic result were achieved. Conclusions: A reconstructive procedure that aims not only to restore the missing volume, but also the lymphatic drainage might successfully reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Both lymphatic interpositional flaps and lymphatic flow-through flaps could be effective, and the right choice must be done according to each patient’s needs.

International audience; Introduction: Abdominopelvic defect is frequently a challenge. Several local flaps exist for this anatomical region, but sequelae of the donor site, particularly with regard to morbidity on the anterior abdominal wall, are frequent. Although the utility of the superficial circumflex iliac artery flap is well established in its free form as well as its pedicled form described by McGregor, the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) propeller flap is rarely reported. The purpose of this study is to highlight the possible range of locoregional coverage using the SCIP propeller flap. Methods: Between 2012 and 2018, 72 SCIP flaps were made in the propeller version to cover locoregional defects of various etiologies in our units. Results: The dimensions of SCIP flaps were on average 20.2 cm long (9-39) by 8.2 cm wide (5-18). The average rotation angle was 163.3° (range 130-180). In sixteen patients, SCIP flaps were bilateral. In five cases, the reconstruction was combined with a contralateral Tensor Fascia Lata (TFL) flap to cover a very large defect. Two SCIP flaps necrotized following global venous congestion and a TFL flap was performed in rescue. No complications appeared on the donor site and the patients did not have any functional complications related to the reconstruction. Particular care was taken to respect the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh. Conclusion: The SCIP propeller flap provides a reliable and versatile method for reconstructing abdominoperineal defect, including the thigh root region to the trochanters with low donor site morbidity.