Search

Objective Preoperative planning of the starting point and safe trajectory for iliosacral screw (SI screw) fixation using CT scans for safe and accurate fluoroscopically controlled percutaneous SI screw placement. Indications Transalar and transforaminal sacral fractures. SI joint disruptions and fracture-dislocations. Non- or minimally displaced spinopelvic dissociation injuries. Contraindications Transiliac instabilities. Sacral fractures with neurological impairment requiring decompression. Relevant residual displacement after closed reduction attempts. Insufficient fluoroscopic visualization of the anatomical landmarks of the upper sacrum. Surgical technique Preoperative planning of the starting point and the safe screw trajectory using CT scans and two-dimensional multiplanar reformation tools. Fluoroscopically guided identification of the starting point using the lateral view according to preoperative planning. Advancing the guidewire under fluoroscopic control using inlet and outlet views according to the planned trajectory. Predrilling and placement of 6.5 mm cannulated screws. Postoperative management Weightbearing as tolerated using crutches. Immediate CT scan in case of postoperative neurological impairment. Generally no screw removal. Results Fifty-nine screws were placed in 34 patients using the described technique. There were 2 cases of screw malpositioning (anatomical landmarks inadequately identified and fluoroscopically controlled SI screw fixation should thus not have been performed at all; in a case with sacral dysmorphism, preoperative planning suggested a posterior and/or caudal S1 starting point, respectively, but intraoperatively, selection of a different starting point and screw trajectory resulted in screw malpositioning with iatrogenic L5 nerve palsy).

Background Iliosacral screw fixation is safe and effective but can be complicated by loss of fixation, particularly in patients with osteopenic bone. Sacral morphology dictates where iliosacral screws may be placed when stabilizing pelvic ring injuries. In dysmorphic sacra, the safe osseous corridor of the upper sacral segment (S1) is smaller and lacks a transsacral corridor, increasing the need for fixation in the second sacral segment (S2). Previous evidence suggests that S2 is less dense than S1. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to further evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) of the S1 and S2 iliosacral osseous pathways through morphology stratification into normal and dysmorphic sacra. Materials and methods Pelvic computed tomography scans of 50 consecutive trauma patients, aged 18 to 50 years, from a level 1 trauma center were analyzed prospectively. Five radiographic features (upper sacral segment not recessed in the pelvis, mammillary bodies, acute alar slope, residual S1 disk, and misshapen sacral foramen) were used to identify dysmorphic characteristics, and sacra with four or five features were classified as dysmorphic. Hounsfield unit values were used to estimate the regional BMD of S1 and S2. Student’s t-test was utilized to compare the mean values at each segment, with statistical significance being set at p Results A statistical difference in BMD was appreciated between S1 and S2 in both normal and dysmorphic sacra (p p = 0.047). No difference in density was appreciated at S2 based on morphology. Conclusions Our results would indicate that, based on BMD alone, fixation should be maximized in S1 prior to fixation in S2. In cases where S2 fixation is required, we recommend that transsacral fixation should be strongly considered if possible to bypass the S2 body and achieve fixation in the cortical bone of the ilium and sacrum. Level of evidence Level III.

Objectives: To investigate the characteristics of iliosacral (IS) screw corridors of Japanese pelves. Methods: Computer tomography images of 42 adult Japanese subjects without any pelvic injury were analyzed at a workstation. Using the manual reconstruction function, the width of a simulated horizontal corridor for an IS screw on the true coronal and true axial planes in the upper (S1), second (S2), and the third (S3) sacral segments was measured. For pelves without an adequate S1 corridor, a cranially tilted corridor was sought. A corridor was defined as “adequate” if its width on both planes was 10 mm or more. Results: An adequate horizontal corridor was found in S1 in 17 (40.5%) subjects, in S2 in 29 (69.0%) subjects, and in S3 in no subject. An independent factor affecting the adequacy of the S1 corridor was the adequacy of the S2 corridor (OR: 0.09). Similarly, an independent factor affecting S2 adequacy was S1 adequacy (OR: 0.10). A tilted, 10 mm diameter corridor was found in all 25 subjects who did not have an adequate horizontal corridor in the S1 segment. The angle required to obtain a 10 mm diameter corridor inversely correlated with the diameter of a horizontal corridor on the true coronal plane (R = −0.713, P = .000). Conclusions: The characteristics of IS screw corridors in the 42 Japanese subjects were similar to those reported in previous studies conducted in the West. The importance of preoperative planning using reliable techniques, such as three-dimensional reconstruction, should be emphasized. Level of evidence: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.