Search

RationaleClumped isotope geochemistry examines the pairing or clumping of heavy isotopes in molecules and provides information about the thermodynamic and kinetic controls on their formation. The first clumped isotope measurements of carbonate minerals were first published 15 years ago, and since then, interlaboratory offsets have been observed, and laboratory and community practices for measurement, data analysis, and instrumentation have evolved. Here we briefly review historical and recent developments for measurements, share Tripati Lab practices for four different instrument configurations, test a recently published proposal for carbonate-based standardization on multiple instruments using multi-year data sets, and report values for 21 different carbonate standards that allow for recalculations of previously published data sets.MethodsWe examine data from 4628 standard measurements on Thermo MAT 253 and Nu Perspective IS mass spectrometers, using a common acid bath (90°C) and small-sample (70°C) individual reaction vessels. Each configuration was investigated by treating some standards as anchors (working standards) and the remainder as unknowns (consistency standards).ResultsWe show that different acid digestion systems and mass spectrometer models yield indistinguishable results when instrument drift is well characterized. For linearity correction, mixed gas-and-carbonate standardization or carbonate-only standardization yields similar results. No difference is observed in the use of three or eight working standards for the construction of transfer functions.ConclusionsWe show that all configurations yield similar results if instrument drift is robustly characterized and validate a recent proposal for carbonate-based standardization using large multiyear data sets. Δ47 values are reported for 21 carbonate standards on both the absolute reference frame (ARF; also refered to as the Carbon Dioxide Equilibrated Scale or CDES) and the new InterCarb-Carbon Dioxide Equilibrium Scale (I-CDES) reference frame, facilitating intercomparison of data from a diversity of labs and instrument configurations and restandardization of a broad range of sample sets between 2006, when the first carbonate measurements were published, and the present.

During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM; ~23,000 to 19,000 years ago or ka) and through the last deglaciation, the Great Basin physiographic region in the western United States was marked by multiple extensive lake systems, as recorded by proxy evidence and lake sediments. However, temporal constraints on the growth, desiccation, and timing of lake highstands remain poorly constrained. Studies aimed at disentangling hydroclimate dynamics have offered multiple hypotheses to explain the growth of post-LGM lakes; however, a more robust understanding is currently impeded by a general paucity of spatially and temporally robust data. In this study, we present new data constraining the timing and extent of lake highstands at three post-LGM age pluvial lakes: Lake Newark, Lake Surprise, and Lake Franklin. This data is used in concert with previously published data for these basins and others from the Northern Great Basin including Lakes Bonneville, Chewaucan, and Lahontan to compare the timings of lake growth and decay over a large spatial scale and constrain how regional hydroclimate evolved through the deglaciation.