1. Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology Manual Skills Construct Validation Trial
- Author
-
Munro, Malcolm G, Advincula, Arnold P, Banks, Erika H, Auguste, Tamika C, Chahine, E Britton, Grace Chen, Chi Chiung, Curlin, Howard L, Jorgensen, Elisa M, Kim, Jin Hee, King, Cara R, Lucas, Joelle, Milad, Magdy P, Mourad, Jamal, Siedhoff, Matthew T, Solnik, M Jonathon, Destephano, Christopher C, Thayn, Kim, and Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology (EMIG) Steering Committee
- Subjects
Canada ,Internship and Residency ,Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology (EMIG) Steering Committee ,United States ,Cohort Studies ,Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine ,Genital Diseases ,Gynecology ,Clinical Research ,Humans ,Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ,Female ,Laparoscopy ,Prospective Studies ,Clinical Competence ,Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine ,Simulation Training - Abstract
ObjectiveTo establish validity evidence for the Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology laparoscopic and hysteroscopic simulation systems.MethodsA prospective cohort study was IRB approved and conducted at 15 sites in the United States and Canada. The four participant cohorts based on training status were: 1) novice (postgraduate year [PGY]-1) residents, 2) mid-level (PGY-3) residents, 3) proficient (American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ABOG]-certified specialists without subspecialty training); and 4) expert (ABOG-certified obstetrician-gynecologists who had completed a 2-year fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery). Qualified participants were oriented to both systems, followed by testing with five laparoscopic exercises (L-1, sleeve-peg transfer; L-2, pattern cut; L-3, extracorporeal tie; L-4, intracorporeal tie; L-5, running suture) and two hysteroscopic exercises (H-1, targeting; H-2, polyp removal). Measured outcomes included accuracy and exercise times, including incompletion rates.ResultsOf 227 participants, 77 were novice, 70 were mid-level, 33 were proficient, and 47 were experts. Exercise times, in seconds (±SD), for novice compared with mid-level participants for the seven exercises were as follows, and all were significant (P
- Published
- 2020