Search

Objectives The aim of the study was to assess the regression of liver stiffness after successful direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) monoinfection and HCV/-HIV coinfection. In addition, we aimed to identify factors associated with liver stiffness regression. Methods We studied patients treated with interferon-free DAA regimens with a sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12) or 24 (SVR24) post-treatment. Liver stiffness was assessed by transient elastography (TE) before the initiation and after the end of treatment (median 12 weeks). Results Of 214 enrolled patients, 85 (40%) were HCV monoinfected and 129 (60%) HCV/HIV coinfected. Baseline median TE values were 7.8 kPa [interquartile range (IQR) 5.9-12.0 kPa] in mono-infected patients and 10.7 kPa (IQR 7.8-17.0 kPa) in coinfected patients. Overall, the median TE value decreased from 10.1 to 6.8 kPa (n = 214; P < 0.0001). There was no difference between mono- and coinfected patients (-2.2 versus -3.3 kPa, respectively; P = 0.88), which was verified by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusting for baseline TE values. Significant (>= 30%) regression of liver stiffness was achieved by 45% of patients (54% with baseline TE >= 7.1 kPa). In multivariate analysis, a prior HCV treatment was a negative predictor of liver stiffness regression [odds ratio (OR) 0.31; P = 0.001]. A higher baseline TE value was positively associated with achieving a significant regression (OR 1.06; P = 0.02). HIV coinfection status, HCV genotype, age, sex, treatment duration, controlled attenuation parameter value, bilirubin concentration, platelet count and aspartate aminotransferase concentration were not associated with liver stiffness regression. Conclusions Regression of liver stiffness after successful DAA treatment did not differ in patients with HCV monoinfection and those with HCV/HIV coinfection. Half of all patients achieved a significant (>= 30%) regression. Prior treatment for HCV was a negative predictor for this endpoint, while a higher baseline TE value was positively associated with regression.

A therapeutic dilemma arises once HIV-infected patients develop a break-through of HIV-replication under potent antiretroviral therapy. Therefore, we studied whether patients (n = 12) who failed double nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTI) plus indinavir or ritonavir triple therapy can be rescued when therapy is switched to double protease inhibitor (PI) treatment (nelfinavir and hard gel saquinavir) and stavudine. With the rescue regimen HIV-RNA levels initially dropped from 148,571 +/- 45,258 copies/ml to 9,310 +/- 6, 965 copies/ml at week 4 (p = 0.0117). However, virus load subsequently increased to almost baseline levels (131,230 +/- 37,743 copies/ml) at week 12. Likewise, CD4-cell counts could only be stabilized initially (baseline 267 +/- 51; week 4 296 +/- 65 cells/microl), but gradually declined thereafter (216 +/- 34 cells/microl week 12). Before therapy was switched, the viral protease gene from 5 analyzed patients showed 3-5 amino acid substitutions. Moreover, 4 of these patients had one amino acid substitution associated with resistance to nelfinavir. Our data suggest that HIV-infected patients resistant to indinavir or ritonavir and double NRTI combination therapy respond to double PI nelfinavir/saquinavir and D4T rescue therapy only initially but have no sustained benefit.

Infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) commonly causes persistent disease, which may lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The pathogenesis of HCV infection is not well understood. It is most likely that both viral and host factors contribute to HCV persistence. This review focuses on the host's immune response to HCV in an attempt to present the current knowledge and concepts of the interactions between the virus and the host during HCV infection. Expansion of B lymphocytes and antibody production to virtually any HCV protein can be detected in most infected patients. However, observations in HCV-infected humans as well as experimental infections in chimpanzees suggest that natural HCV infection does not induce protective immunity, and reinfection can readily be demonstrated after inoculation with homologous or independent strains in HCV-seroconverted animals. Nevertheless, the immune system may gain partial control over HCV even in patients with chronic infection, as HCV infection in severely immunocompromised patients runs a particular cholestatic course which may rapidly lead to death from liver failure. Cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocyte responses to HCV proteins have been characterized in peripheral blood and liver tissue and were found to be remarkably polyclonal and multispecific. Epitopes were identified on all of the putative HCV proteins, although only few major histocompatibility complex molecules were considered restriction elements. Immunoregulation may be particularly important in HCV infection. The HCV core and NS4 proteins appear to be most immunogenic for peripheral blood lymphocytes, and NS4 specific CD4+ lymphocytes are preferentially compartmentalized to the liver. However, there is an inverse relationship between CD4+ lymphocyte responses and antibody levels in infected patients. Furthermore, a strong cellular response to the HCV core protein apparently favors a benign course of infection. This unusual T-B cell relationship may be the consequence of an altered cytokine release during HCV infection. Alternatively, this virus may have found devices that can disturb immunoregulation in infected patients. A better understanding of these immunological mechanisms induced by HCV infection should make it possible to develop more effective strategies for the prevention and treatment of this insidious disease.

The impact of intrahepatic messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) on the outcome of antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C was evaluated.Semiquantitative mRNA determination was performed on 36 pretreatment liver biopsies by reverse transcription/competitive polymerase chain reaction.Sustained response (normal aminotransferase levels and negative hepatitis C virus [HCV] RNA for more than 6 months) was achieved in 13 patients, whereas 23 of 36 patients did not achieve sustained response (12 partial responders, 11 complete nonresponders). In sustained responders, pretreatment intrahepatic mRNA levels of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha were lower than in nonsustained responders (IFN-gamma, 0.23 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.35 +/- 0.07, respectively; p = 0.024 and TNF-alpha, 1.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.3 +/- 1.4, respectively; p= 0.009); similarly, HCV viral load was lower in sustained responders than in nonresponders (663,424 +/- 756,389 copies/mL vs. 1,656,713 +/- 1,517,683 copies/mL, respectively; p = 0.037). In addition, TNF-alpha mRNA levels were correlated to HCV viral load and liver fibrosis scores.Higher intrahepatic mRNA levels of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha may reflect interferon resistance of HCV strains and may contribute to tissue damage in patients refractory to antiviral treatment.

The aim of this study was to examine the interaction between HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hemophiliacs coinfected with the viruses and to investigate the possible relationship between immunosuppression and liver failure.To identify risk factors for impending liver failure in hemophiliacs coinfected with HIV and HCV, we analyzed clinical and laboratory parameters, including CD4 count, aminotransferases (ALT, AST), cholinesterase, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and gamma-glutamyltransferase, during 3 yr of follow-up (1990-1993) in four groups of patients: hemophiliacs with progressive immunodeficiency who were coinfected with HCV and HIV (group A, n = 49); hemophiliacs with stable immune function who were seropositive for HIV and HCV (group B, n = 95); hemophiliacs who were infected with HCV but not HIV (group C, n = 72); and homosexuals with progressive immunodeficiency who were infected with HIV but not HCV (group D, n = 24).Univariate analysis of data for group A showed a significant rise in gamma-glutamyltransferase and alkaline phosphatase (p0.01) that was not seen in groups B, C, and D. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, age (odds ratio, 1.054 per yr; 95% confidence interval, 1.014-1.096 per yr), decline in CD4 count (odds ratio, 1.063 per cell/microl; 95% confidence interval, 1.037-1.091 per cell/microl), and alkaline phosphatase level (odds ratio, 1.012 per U/L; 95% confidence interval, 1.002-1.021 per U/L) emerged as independent determinants of death.Our data suggest that progressive immune dysfunction in hemophiliacs coinfected with HIV and HCV may influence progression of liver failure. In these patients cholestasis is an additional prognostic marker for survival that may reflect both exhausted immunity and impaired liver function.

The admission to intensive care is controversially discussed in patients with HIV infection, since life expectancy is limited. Therefore, we analyzed indications, outcomes and follow up of all patients with confirmed HIV-infection and Aids defining symptoms who had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of our department between 1985-1996.49 patients were admitted to the ICU, 42 of them with CDC stage C of HIV infection before admission. The leading indications were pneumonia (n = 15; PCP: 10, bacterial: 5), acute bleedings (n = 14), acute neurological diseases (n = 6), and gastrointestinal perforation (n = 5). Overall mortality was 39% (19/49) with a higher mortality seen in patients with respiratory disorders (53%) compared to non-respiratory disorders (22%, n.s.). The only significant predictor of mortality was the serum creatinine (p = 0.001), while differences in the APACHE II score between survivors and non-survivors did not reach statistical significance (22 +/- 7, 16 +/- 5; p = 0.14). During follow up no difference was seen in the life expectancy of HIV-infected survivors of intensive care as compared to those patients with AIDS who had never been admitted to ICU (8.4 months versus 9 months).The need for intensive care in HIV infected patients does not accelerate the progression of HIV infection to death, if the complications requiring ICU intervention can be managed successfully. Respiratory infections and impaired renal function are risk factors for a fatal outcome. Thus, HIV infected patients benefit from intensive care therapy.

The immunological and clinical benefits of structured treatment interruptions (STIs) during primary HIV-1 infection remain largely unclear.Eight patients identified during primary HIV-1 infection were immediately treated with HAART and underwent subsequent STIs after reaching complete viral suppression of HIV-RNA in peripheral plasma. HAART was re-initiated if either HIV-1 RNA5000 copies/ml, CD4-cells200 cells/microl or symptomatic HIV-1 disease was observed.After treatment discontinuation, four of eight patients were able to persistently control HIV-1 viremia below 5000 copies/ml until the last time point of follow-up (median 3 years). CD4-cell counts were within the interquartile range of untreated individuals compared to historical reference data from the MACS cohort. In the remaining study subjects persistent virological control was not reached despite repeated STIs. Moreover, compared to the MACS cohort repetitive virological failures during STIs appeared to induce an accelerated decline of CD4-cells.Spontaneous HIV-1 control after treated primary HIV-1 infection was possible in four out of eight individuals, however, if STIs after treated primary infection ameliorate the overall HIV-1 disease progression remains unknown. In the absence of viral control, repetitive viral exposure during STIs might be associated with accelerated decline of CD4-cell counts.

HIV has evolved several strategies to evade recognition by the host immune system including down-regulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. However, reduced expression of MHC class I molecules may stimulate natural killer (NK) cell lysis in cells of haematopoietic lineage. Here, we describe how HIV counteracts stimulation of NK cells by stabilizing surface expression of the non-classical MHC class I molecule, HLA-E. We demonstrate enhanced expression of HLA-E on lymphocytes from HIV-infected patients and show that in vitro infection of lymphocytes with HIV results in up-regulation of HLA-E expression and reduced susceptibility to NK cell cytotoxicity. Using HLA-E transfected K-562 cells, we identified the well-known HIV T-cell epitope p24 aa14-22a as a ligand for HLA-E that stabilizes surface expression of HLA-E, favouring inhibition of NK cell cytotoxicity.These results propose HIV-mediated up-regulation of HLA-E expression as an additional evasion strategy targeting the antiviral activities of NK cells, which may contribute to the capability of the virus in establishing chronic infection.

IL28B polymorphisms strongly predict spontaneous and treatment-induced clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. A recent study proposed a 32-base pair deletion in the CC-chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) gene (CCR5-D32) interacting with the IL28B polymorphisms to influence spontaneous HCV clearance. The aim of this study was to clarify the role of CCR5-D32 in treatmentinduced clearance of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). A cross-sectional cohort of 813 Caucasian patients with CHC genotype 1 (365 responders and 448 non-responders) who had received standard of care dual therapy with interferon (IFN)-a and ribavirin (RBV) was genotyped for the CCR5-D32 and IL28B polymorphisms to examine their interaction with respect to treatment response. CCR5-D32 did not influence treatment-induced recovery to IFN-a/RBV in CHC, and did not improve prediction of sustained virological response in the context of the IL28B polymorphisms in a multivariate model. CCR5-D32 homozygotes were significantly more frequent in those with CHC than healthy controls in the European cohorts (2.9% vs 0.4%, Po0.0001), but not in Australians of European ancestry. In conclusion, CCR5-D32 does not influence treatment response in the context of IL28B polymorphisms. Although CCR5-D32 may affect viral clearance within closely controlled geographical and genetic environments, we found no effect in larger cohorts treated with dual therapy. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

International audience; BACKGROUND & AIMS: Elafibranor is an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ. Elafibranor improves insulin sensitivity, glucose homeostasis, and lipid metabolism and reduces inflammation. We assessed the safety and efficacy of elafibranor in an international, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).METHODS: Patients with NASH without cirrhosis were randomly assigned to groups given elafibranor 80 mg (n= 93), elafibranor 120 mg (n= 91), or placebo (n= 92) each day for 52 weeks at sites in Europe and the United States. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed every 2 months during this 1-year period. Liver biopsies were then collected and patients were assessed 3 months later. The primary outcome was resolution of NASH without fibrosis worsening, using protocol-defined and modified definitions. Data from the groups given the different doses of elafibranor were compared with those from the placebo group using step-down logistic regression, adjusting for baseline nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score.RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference between the elafibranor and placebo groups in the protocol-defined primary outcome. However, NASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in a higher proportion of patients in the 120-mg elafibranor group vs the placebo group (19% vs 12%; odds ratio= 2.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-5.24; P= .045), based on a post-hoc analysis for the modified definition. In post-hoc analyses of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥4 (n= 234), elafibranor 120 mg resolved NASH in larger proportions of patients than placebo based on the protocol definition (20% vs 11%; odds ratio= 3.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.22-8.13; P= .018) and the modified definitions (19% vs 9%; odds ratio= 3.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.32-9.40; P= .013). Patients with NASH resolution after receiving elafibranor 120 mg had reduced liver fibrosis stages compared with those without NASH resolution (mean reduction of 0.65 ± 0.61 in responders for the primary outcome vs an increase of 0.10 ± 0.98 in nonresponders; P < .001). Liver enzymes, lipids, glucose profiles, and markers of systemic inflammation were significantly reduced in the elafibranor 120-mg group vs the placebo group. Elafibranor was welltolerated and did not cause weight gain or cardiac events, but did produce a mild, reversible increase in serum creatinine (effect size vs placebo: increase of 4.31 ± 1.19 μmol/L; P < .001).CONCLUSIONS: A post-hoc analysis of data from trial of patients with NASH showed that elafibranor (120 mg/d for 1 year) resolved NASH without fibrosis worsening, based on a modified definition, in the intention-to-treat analysis and in patients with moderate or severe NASH. However, the predefined end point was not met in the intention to treat population. Elafibranor was well tolerated and improved patients' cardiometabolic risk profile. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01694849.