1. Feasibility and Safety of Adopting Next-Day Discharge as First-Line Option After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
- Author
-
Yasuhiro, Ichibori, Jun, Li, Angela, Davis, Toral M, Patel, Jerry, Lipinski, Muhammad, Panhwar, Petar, Saric, Ghazanfar, Qureshi, Sandeep M, Patel, Basar, Sareyyupoglu, Alan H, Markowitz, Hiram G, Bezerra, Marco A, Costa, David A, Zidar, Ankur, Kalra, and Guilherme F, Attizzani
- Subjects
Aged, 80 and over ,Male ,Academic Medical Centers ,Time Factors ,Aortic Valve Stenosis ,Length of Stay ,Patient Readmission ,Risk Assessment ,Severity of Illness Index ,Survival Analysis ,Patient Discharge ,United States ,Cohort Studies ,Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ,Feasibility Studies ,Humans ,Female ,Patient Safety ,Propensity Score ,Aged ,Follow-Up Studies ,Ohio ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Data on next-day discharge (NDD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are limited. This study investigated the feasibility and safety of NDD as a first-line option (the very-early discharge [VED] strategy) compared with the early-discharge (ED) strategy (2-3 days as a first-line option) after TAVR.We reviewed 611 consecutive patients who had minimalist TAVR (transfemoral approach under conscious sedation) and no in-hospital mortality; a total of 418 patients underwent ED strategy (since December 2013) and 193 patients underwent VED strategy (as part of a hospital initiative to reduce length of stay, since August 2016). NDD in the VED strategy was performed with heart team consensus in patients without significant complications. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality/rehospitalization.Sixty-five patients (33.7%) in the VED strategy and 10 patients (2.4%) in the ED strategy were discharged the next day (P.001). NDD patients had received balloon-expandable (n = 30) or self-expanding valves (n = 45) and showed a similar primary outcome rate compared with non-NDD patients. After adjustment using propensity score matching (172 pairs), post-TAVR length of stay was significantly shorter in the VED group (3.2 ± 3.1 days) than in the ED group (3.5 ± 2.7 days; P.01). The primary outcome did not differ between the two groups (7.0% vs 11.6%; P=.14), with comparable 30-day mortality rate (1.2% vs 2.3%; P=.68) and rehospitalization rate (5.8% vs 11.1%; P=.08).Utilization of NDD as a first-line option after minimalist TAVR is feasible and safe, and leads to further reduction in length of stay compared with an ED strategy.
- Published
- 2019