Search

e16668 Background: The multikinase inhibitor cabozantinib has been approved by the European Medicines Agency in November 2018 for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prior treated with sorafenib. We report, to our knowledge, for the first time safety and efficacy data of an international, multicenter, real-world cohort of patients with advanced HCC treated with cabozantinib. Methods: Patients with HCC who were treated with cabozantinib were retrospectively identified across 10 centers in Austria and Germany. Patients´ characteristics, side effects, duration of treatment and survival data were analyzed until January 17, 2020. Results: 74 patients were identified of whom 65 patients were male (88%) and 9 were female (12%). The median age at the start of cabozantinib treatment was 66 years. The most common underlying liver diseases included hepatitis C in 15 (20%), hepatitis B in 6 (8%), alcohol in 17 (23%) and NAFLD/NASH in 20 (27%) patients, respectively. 64 patients (86%) had BCLC stage C and 43 patients (58%) were Child Pugh A. Cabozantinib was used as systemic second- and third-line treatment in 37 (50%), and 25 (34%) patients, respectively. In the remaining patients cabozantinib was used in further lines. The median starting dose was 40 mg (20-60 mg). In 26 patients (35%) a dose reduction due to side effects was performed. Following best responses under cabozantinib were documented: partial response in 4 (5%), stable disease in 22 (30%), and progressive disease in 24 (32%) patients, respectively. 24 patients (32%) had not yet been evaluable. The median duration of cabozantinib treatment was 4.4 months. 35 patients (47%) had died at day of data analysis. The median overall survival from start of cabozantinib treatment was 7.7 months. Most common adverse events were fatigue and diarrhea. Conclusions: Cabozantinib treatment was effective, safe and feasible in patients with advanced HCC. Patients in the real life setting had more advanced liver disease – only 58% of patients were Child A. Duration of treatment was similar to the phase 3 trial (CELESTIAL). However, overall survival was shorter, probably due to more advanced liver disease.

Cox Regression analysis subgroup T1 or T2. Table S2. Sequences of target miRNAs used in qPCR analysis. Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier curve subgroup analysis T1 and T2 tumors. Recurrence free survival (RFS) of patients with T1 and T2 tumor status stratified by high vs. low expression of miR-135a in HCC tissue. Cox regression p=0.146, n=16. Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. (DOCX 237 kb)

Cox Regression analysis subgroup T1 or T2. Table S2. Sequences of target miRNAs used in qPCR analysis. Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier curve subgroup analysis T1 and T2 tumors. Recurrence free survival (RFS) of patients with T1 and T2 tumor status stratified by high vs. low expression of miR-135a in HCC tissue. Cox regression p=0.146, n=16. Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. (DOCX 237 kb)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can have viral or non-viral causes1-5. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an important driver of HCC. Immunotherapy has been approved for treating HCC, but biomarker-based stratification of patients for optimal response to therapy is an unmet need6,7. Here we report the progressive accumulation of exhausted, unconventionally activated CD8+PD1+ T cells in NASH-affected livers. In preclinical models of NASH-induced HCC, therapeutic immunotherapy targeted at programmed death-1 (PD1) expanded activated CD8+PD1+ T cells within tumours but did not lead to tumour regression, which indicates that tumour immune surveillance was impaired. When given prophylactically, anti-PD1 treatment led to an increase in the incidence of NASH-HCC and in the number and size of tumour nodules, which correlated with increased hepatic CD8+PD1+CXCR6+, TOX+, and TNF+ T cells. The increase in HCC triggered by anti-PD1 treatment was prevented by depletion of CD8+ T cells or TNF neutralization, suggesting that CD8+ T cells help to induce NASH-HCC, rather than invigorating or executing immune surveillance. We found similar phenotypic and functional profiles in hepatic CD8+PD1+ T cells from humans with NAFLD or NASH. A meta-analysis of three randomized phase III clinical trials that tested inhibitors of PDL1 (programmed death-ligand 1) or PD1 in more than 1,600 patients with advanced HCC revealed that immune therapy did not improve survival in patients with non-viral HCC. In two additional cohorts, patients with NASH-driven HCC who received anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 treatment showed reduced overall survival compared to patients with other aetiologies. Collectively, these data show that non-viral HCC, and particularly NASH-HCC, might be less responsive to immunotherapy, probably owing to NASH-related aberrant T cell activation causing tissue damage that leads to impaired immune surveillance. Our data provide a rationale for stratification of patients with HCC according to underlying aetiology in studies of immunotherapy as a primary or adjuvant treatment.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can have viral or non-viral causes1-5. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an important driver of HCC. Immunotherapy has been approved for treating HCC, but biomarker-based stratification of patients for optimal response to therapy is an unmet need6,7. Here we report the progressive accumulation of exhausted, unconventionally activated CD8+PD1+ T cells in NASH-affected livers. In preclinical models of NASH-induced HCC, therapeutic immunotherapy targeted at programmed death-1 (PD1) expanded activated CD8+PD1+ T cells within tumours but did not lead to tumour regression, which indicates that tumour immune surveillance was impaired. When given prophylactically, anti-PD1 treatment led to an increase in the incidence of NASH-HCC and in the number and size of tumour nodules, which correlated with increased hepatic CD8+PD1+CXCR6+, TOX+, and TNF+ T cells. The increase in HCC triggered by anti-PD1 treatment was prevented by depletion of CD8+ T cells or TNF neutralization, suggesting that CD8+ T cells help to induce NASH-HCC, rather than invigorating or executing immune surveillance. We found similar phenotypic and functional profiles in hepatic CD8+PD1+ T cells from humans with NAFLD or NASH. A meta-analysis of three randomized phase III clinical trials that tested inhibitors of PDL1 (programmed death-ligand 1) or PD1 in more than 1,600 patients with advanced HCC revealed that immune therapy did not improve survival in patients with non-viral HCC. In two additional cohorts, patients with NASH-driven HCC who received anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 treatment showed reduced overall survival compared to patients with other aetiologies. Collectively, these data show that non-viral HCC, and particularly NASH-HCC, might be less responsive to immunotherapy, probably owing to NASH-related aberrant T cell activation causing tissue damage that leads to impaired immune surveillance. Our data provide a rationale for stratification of patients with HCC according to underlying aetiology in studies of immunotherapy as a primary or adjuvant treatment.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can have viral or non-viral causes1–5. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an important driver of HCC. Immunotherapy has been approved for treating HCC, but biomarker-based stratification of patients for optimal response to therapy is an unmet need6, 7. Here we report the progressive accumulation of exhausted, unconventionally activated CD8+PD1+ T cells in NASH-affected livers. In preclinical models of NASH-induced HCC, therapeutic immunotherapy targeted at programmed death-1 (PD1) expanded activated CD8+PD1+ T cells within tumours but did not lead to tumour regression, which indicates that tumour immune surveillance was impaired. When given prophylactically, anti-PD1 treatment led to an increase in the incidence of NASH–HCC and in the number and size of tumour nodules, which correlated with increased hepatic CD8+PD1+CXCR6+, TOX+, and TNF+ T cells. The increase in HCC triggered by anti-PD1 treatment was prevented by depletion of CD8+ T cells or TNF neutralization, suggesting that CD8+ T cells help to induce NASH–HCC, rather than invigorating or executing immune surveillance. We found similar phenotypic and functional profiles in hepatic CD8+PD1+ T cells from humans with NAFLD or NASH. A meta-analysis of three randomized phase III clinical trials that tested inhibitors of PDL1 (programmed death-ligand 1) or PD1 in more than 1,600 patients with advanced HCC revealed that immune therapy did not improve survival in patients with non-viral HCC. In two additional cohorts, patients with NASH-driven HCC who received anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 treatment showed reduced overall survival compared to patients with other aetiologies. Collectively, these data show that non-viral HCC, and particularly NASH–HCC, might be less responsive to immunotherapy, probably owing to NASH-related aberrant T cell activation causing tissue damage that leads to impaired immune surveillance. Our data provide a rationale for stratification of patients with HCC according to underlying aetiology in studies of immunotherapy as a primary or adjuvant treatment.